Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dr. Kevin Stillwagon's avatar

It's so easy to believe the lie that there is protection in antibodies that are created by shots called vaccines. People want to believe that lie. The truth is, the protection is all cellular and that protection is fully developed by experiencing a natural exposure to the pathogen through its normal entry method that is usually through the epithelial barrier involving cellular receptors. When that happens, fully robust antibodies to ALL parts of the invader, and the memory to quickly remake them will be there as a backup if the cellular protection fails in the future. You can't get that kind of protection with shots. In fact, there are known mechanisms whereby the shots destroy the cellular protection. The problem is, if people are scared enough of natural exposures, they will still run out to get a shot. And big pharma knows that, and will continue to stoke the fear. https://rumble.com/v4wx7fi-the-power-of-antibodies-unveiling-the-truth-behind-artificial-immunization.html

Expand full comment
Allie's avatar

Dr. McCullough and others have reported on the failure of smallpox vaccination in preventing smallpox, citing fatal infections from such things as syphilis due to contamination. The contamination came from the crude way of obtaining the serum. However, I have not heard him speak of the benefit of the vaccine obtained using modern techniques. Granted, there were no smallpox outbreaks at the time I received my smallpox vaccine and one could say the risk of adverse effects outweighed any benefit at the time. But the question I have yet to hear Dr. McCullough answer is, did the smallpox vaccine eradicate smallpox in any part of the world? When was the last known case of smallpox?

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts