Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jill's avatar

It is such a relief listening to you and reading your essays. My husband and I attended the Censorship Industrial Complex Exposed launch in London last night with Russel Brand, Michael Shellenberger and Matthew Taibbi. It was wonderful to be around free thinkers from so many different walks of life. No matter what position you take it is more important than ever that we talk to each other and debate. John and Peter have been a light in a very dark tunnel over the past three years. Thank you!

Expand full comment
Dr.J at Common Sense Medicine's avatar

As a physician with a natural bent I prefer gaining immunity in as natural a way as possible. Just make sure your defenses are optimal before relying on them, and those of our airways are NOT optimal.

One of the things not discussed by the vaccers is their financial interest in their product, which is the most prominent sign of bias. Another is what happens when the shot is given. We are told the mRNA gets into our cells and builds the foreign protein that triggers immunity. WE ARE NOT told that our cells coat that protein in a glycan cover that identifies it as us, EVEN THOUGH THIS PROCESS IS UNIVERSAL. That means we have a wolf in our own clothing circulating in our bodies waiting to be discovered wherever the glycans take them.

I doubt very much that our immune systems are up to distinguishing the motives of the vaccers and can't help wondering if the rise of autoimmune problems–now seen to include autism–are not related.

Prior to releasing a drug, any drug, including vaccines, they should be given to fruit flies and their life expectancy measured. If it's shorter do the same for rats, and rabbits. Our current analytical methods are blind to all of the interconnections eliminated in the analysis. Measuring life expectancy is the easiest and best alternative.

Expand full comment
139 more comments...

No posts