35 Comments
User's avatar
Mell's avatar

These studies are great to hear about, but sadly this is something that only a small percentage of the population like us, believes is true, legacy media wouldn't touch this story, I think it will take 20 years for the rest of the population to catch up on and GOD bless the souls suffering from it!!!!

Expand full comment
sandy's avatar

New Rasmussen survey reports that 56% of Americans polled believe the covid shots have killed or seriously injured people.

Expand full comment
Mell's avatar

True but I live in northeast, liberals would never admit their vaccines ideology could be causing problems, even my own spouse believes people getting sick and dying is just normal and due to aging.

Expand full comment
Marilyn Hagerman's avatar

I know people that are so adamantly sure mRNA jabs do no harm they actually line up for boosters!! People dying all around them - they just think this is normal. Studies, investigations of WEF ideologies clearly tell us COVID jabs were mandated to reduce world populations….on advice of Soros, Gates, Schwab etc. irregardless, there are people that are mentally incapable of adjusting to TRUTH! Your spouse is one…must be very difficult for you to tolerate!!

Expand full comment
KarlM Alias's avatar

Aging in their 20's, 30's?

Expand full comment
Laurie's avatar

I suspect that much of that 56% is explained by those aware of the myocarditis risk, which received a fair amount of publicity early on. The vast majority are probably unaware of the increase in cancer, much less the connection to the shots. Even if they've heard about it, they'd be in denial because it is so painful to contemplate.

Expand full comment
Barbara Charis's avatar

The majority of people know that covid shots are deadly now..and people need to keep passing information along to others. Tell people to read...Vaccines; Mythology, Ideology and Reality. They really need to know the history of all vaccines, which started with the injection of cow pus...Doctors didn't know what caused diseases, but injections became a money making tool for them to use.

Expand full comment
KarenD's avatar

The huge elephant in the room is that no media companies aren’t, or reporting the died suddenlies the turbo cancers the blood clots and strokes

Expand full comment
PatriciaAnne's avatar

I'm shocked at how many people diagnosed with cancer are already at stage 4. This isn't normal.

Expand full comment
Susan P ...'s avatar

Thank you for this article. This is a worldwide democide (death by gov't) & genocide. My heart aches for all the vaccine injured. Dear Lord, deliver us from evil & help us continue to take right action & speak TRUTH to medical tyranny. In God we Trust ...

Expand full comment
sandy's avatar

One thing Karen Kingston reports in below interview about last week's CDC ACIP covid shot regulatory meeting is that it was found the Pfizer shot induces in some people genetic alteration causing myocarditis. Pfizer happens to have the only patented product for treating that type of myocarditis and it costs 250,000 per year.

https://rumble.com/v6ze10e-its-official-cv19-vax-not-safe-and-effective-karen-kingston.html

Expand full comment
Margaret H. Brazda's avatar

So frightening and despicable!

Expand full comment
Ionedery2's avatar

Plausible deniability is what covid and the injections are about. It's interesting how it's starting to unravel now years later. It all depended on media control and censorship hiding the science and data. It depended on mass formation, fear, entrenched vaccine ideology, ignorance.

What they didn't see coming was the rise of alternate sources of information like substack, and bit by bit the narrative became exposed for those who dared to see the truth. I don't think they thought about the backlash from all the injuries and deaths that led to the loss of trust and the strange turn of events that led to Kennedy and Trump rising up despite all the money against them.

Whoever these people are, in pharma, the military, governments, globalists, media and tech cabals, etc. they must know by now that the jig is up. They made mistakes that caused the narrative to unravel and the truth to emerge, but it wasn't a mistake what they did. It was done with deadly intent and it's now out in the open.

Expand full comment
Ted's avatar

"It was done with deadly intent and it's now out in the open."

With sincere respect; psychopaths seldom require deadly intent, they simply don't care who suffers and dies.

Expand full comment
KarlM Alias's avatar

Tens of millions dead, at least. Billions are injured and badly suffering. As far as psychos go, Hannibal Lecter is a Boy Scout compared to these effers.

Expand full comment
Ionedery2's avatar

Yeah it could be that. It's still bad and a threat to us all.

Expand full comment
Ted's avatar

I think your post was quite accurate and very much to the point.

I've been laboring to minimize the damage caused by narcissists, sociopaths and psychopaths in the workplace for many years, and finally came to the realization that no guardrails can contain them, no rehabilitation is possible. They leave a trail of broken lives in their wake.

I suppose that my point is that it just doesn't matter what their actual motives are; they must be isolated from ordinary neurotics (which really applies to most of us to one degree or another,) and prevented from pursing any of their aims whatsoever.

Expand full comment
Mell's avatar

So many men I work with have heart problems now , I am the only one with a normal blood pressure, it's crazy!

Expand full comment
Dee Cream's avatar

no one held responsible- cancer care should be free for everyone an the pharmaceutical companies pay

Expand full comment
KarlM Alias's avatar

Cancer 'care'?? Their slash/burn/poison 'treatments' do not work very well, especially against the mRNA-induced turbo cancers.

Far better chances with holistic type therapies.

Expand full comment
DaughteroftheKing's avatar

AMEN!

Expand full comment
Danny Huckabee's avatar

Only 6?

Expand full comment
Ted's avatar

But.... but... it's a cohort study and only an RCT is acceptable, and besides, the authors are bad people with unearned credentials. Everyone knows that foreigners can't do good science and experts say so! ..... and I believe in science!

I keep trying to abjure sarcasm and, have, obviously, failed.

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

Unfortunately there are probably almost no "purebloods" because almost all the uninjected have been shed upon. I wonder how much higher the cancer risk would be in jabbed compared to purebloods if such people still existed.

This study adds weight to the other couple of thousand studies indicating that the shots are or may be harmful.

Will any good come of it?

I can't envisage Secretary Kennedy or President Trump stopping mRNA vaccination just because millions of Americans and others may be at risk of dying from turbocancers.

Expand full comment
Dag Waddell's avatar

That’s one year, give it some time.

Expand full comment
John's avatar

Isn't it true that without prospective blinding and placebo controls these reports have too many confounding factors?

Expand full comment
Allie's avatar

Imagine the results if they looked past one year

Expand full comment
James Keith's avatar

"She cried, 'Snake, why did you do that to me? I put you up, I took you in, I took such care of you'"

"Shut up, you silly woman," said the snake

"I could have been your friend, but now I'm gonna be your end

How could you expect, so much from a snake like me

You knew damn well I was a snake before you took me in"

Expand full comment
BigT's avatar

Keep ‘em coming

Expand full comment