We found an alarming number of deaths among infants and toddlers shortly after MMR/MMRV vaccination in VAERS — often involving SIDS, seizures, and cardiac arrest.
This report is going to have a seismic impact on the CDC childhood vaccines. Millions of parents (including myself) cannot thank you, Dr. McCullough and the McCullough team enough for this critical analysis.
I disagree it will have a seismic impact. All jab shills have to do is say there would have been so many measles deaths without the jabs, they are a net benefit. That can be countered by extrapolating from pre-jab measles death rates, etc. But that's not hard numbers like here. Any time you get away from hard numbers, they win because they've owned the messengers, and can get away with as much nonsense as they need.
For now the measles jabs are safe as real scientific studies like this are buried and not seen by the masses. Sigh. Show the embalmers’ clots photos and people Will question the safety of the covid “vaccine” … and then the measles vaccine.
💯👍 Especially if they factor in the more accurate estimated Under Reporting Factor for VAERS between 34-41%. Even with that being a conservative estimate, I think recalculating the data would show a devastatingly effective infanticide program.
Those people responsible you refer to, same ones rubbing elbows with Epstein a decade or two ago and are now protecting each other from being ferried away to prison.
This study is a prime example of why vaccines and medical interventions should never be mandated or coerced and why the vaccine liability protection needs to be eliminated.Senator Rand Paul introduced Bill 3853 on February 11th, which would eliminate the vaccine liability shield. Ask your senators to cosponsor the bill. House Rep Massey sponsored Bill 4668 to end the vaccine liability shield carve out. democracy.io
Giving a child more than one vaccine at a time has always been insanity. If there is an adverse, even deadly, reaction how is the parent, doctor, or health system to know which vaccine caused the adverse event.
Are we supposed to be surprised that man-made chemicals forced upon children by a greedy corrupt pharmaceutical industry was more harmful than natural recovery, inferring natural immunity?
Those parties got children infected with natural measles which provides better immunity than vaccines do. Measles deaths are extremely rare in children.
"If" the vaccine prevents measles in youth, it might return in adulthood--where it is truly dangerous. Let nature run its course in infancy and allow for natural immunity.
FYI, The acrynom SIDS - Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and SUDS - Sudden Unexpected Death Syndrome should also be searched using the term SUID - Sudden Unexpected Infant Death or SUDI - Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy, as it's now commonly written in the medical, scientific, and forensic literature. Obfuscation?
And before that, it was called crib death...blaming Mom for not putting her baby in the correct sleeping position. How is that for adding insult to injury. It could also be called vaccine induced infant death.
Great work. And vaers would only capture a small fraction of likely vaccine-caused deaths, right? The 7 measles deaths is perhaps inflated or a dubious stat. Seven deaths from measles in 40 years? More children have died from lightening strikes or being beamed by a baseball.
I totally support this, but the devils advocate in me is wondering if this can be explained because far fewer children are getting measles because they’re vaccinated?
I wondered about this as well. However, I also know that we have been lied to about the lethality of measles when it is actually quite treatable if proper protocols are used and natural infection generally provides longer and more robust immunity. If parents were provided the a full disclosure then they would be able to make a more informed choice as to whether to vaccinate or not.
Makes sense to me. I was born in 1952. Most all of us (mu sister and i and our friends) had the measles, etc and as far as i know, none of us died from any childhood diseases.
Thanks for posting that from Dr. Humphries book! They did a tremendous labor of love getting that book published! I recommend it to as many as I can so they can see the PROOF rather than take my word for it! We have so many family and friends around us with autistic kids that still question how and why!! 😖
perhaps. it's hard to say how many kids would get measles if majority weren't vaccinated and what mortality rates would be. I assume most accurate numbers we have are numbers from before and right after the measles vaccine was introduced. And then you have questions about cofounding variables like malnutrition, poor sanitation etc.
Nicolas, I appreciate and follow your work, but I have a sincere request. Can you do a reanalysis using data from 1950s for deaths from measles since during the last decades we have had very few measles cases comparatively (a reduction in cases which is almost certainly due to the measles vaccines). Even that would not be quite fair (to use 1950s deaths to compare) either since medical care has certainly improved since the 1950’s. Could one use changes in RSV mortality as an adjuster from 1950s to now to account for advances in medical improvement. That data is available in National Vital Statistics reports.
I wish they had done proper placebo controlled testing so we could really know if the trade off was worth it. With under-recognition and under reporting of injuries, it is so incredibly difficult to know true harms so as to see if benefits are worth it (at least on average if not for all individuals). ~physician parent of vaccine injured child (twice injured before he got to MMR)
💯 agreed in essence. The problem is also that we have no "unvaccinated" vs "vaccinated" controlled studies going back that far. Or at least we have only one or two recent ones.
Definitions have also changed - "unvaccinated", "vaccinated", "placebo" etc, as well as no distinction between wild type vs vaccine induced.
The point is the data is of such poor quality, intentionally so as to allow manipulation, for so long that it is essentially useless except for sound bitescand fear mongering.🤔😐🤦♀️ even the well meaning studies have enough holes in them to poke an elephant through! However, they should have generated discussion and better scientific enquiry LONG before now.😐🙄
The only way to accurately understand by the current rules of the "gold standard" research, is to redo the research from scratch. But that doesnt sell tickets, win votes or placate the masses.🤫😐 on either side.
Personally, i think if the game is rigged, then the only way to win is to not play the game. Choose different. Create new rules/standards/definitions.....🤔😉
Vaxx industry has literally killed millions and caused some kind of harm to tens of millions. In dollars, the damages are probably too immense to be measured in any sensible way, but we are surely talking about trillions now, accumulated over the decades. I am willing to admit that some vaccines might have been slightly beneficial to public health at some point, but the pro/con ratio is probably around 1/100 by now, if not 1/1000.
As a math guy I have to point out what I see as a problem here. For a fair comparison we need to know how many would have died from measles without the jab (which is unknowable, as is the real, much higher number of jab deaths). For example, if there would have been 27 times as many measles deaths in the absence of the jabs, it's a wash (on fatalities, other jab injuries skew the assessment). These numbers are important, but must be considered within that context. Bravo to Nick for correctly stating there are 2,657 percent MORE deaths by jab. There are 2,757% AS MANY deaths by jab - most would incorrectly say 2,757 percent MORE. To be clear, we are purebloods, never get jabs of any variety, see pharma as the criminals they are, and are thrilled our grandkids are 100% unvaccinated. We absolutely love Nick and John Leake in this house, they are heroes. I'm a proud antivaxxer. But a math guy too so I think this should be mentioned.
That's a good point. You really can't do a good comparison unless you do an actual study with a control group and account for confounding variables. If the vaccines were very safe and effective you'd think the powers who be would be more than happy to conduct such studies. I hope this study helps at least in making people think about the ethical issues of forcing vaccines on people with clear dangers.
Thanks for watching out for us, Karen. Indeed this report is a heartbreaker. Time is past to declare war on Pharma and their minions, especially freaks like the eugenics crowd. Doctors still profiting from administering these noxious wastes into kids are on notice. Justice is coming.
To all those here who still believe measles was a deadly disease prior to the intro of the vax:
Please read the genius book by Suzanne Humprhries MD and Roman Bystrianyk, DISSOLVING ILLUSIONS. For now, check out the graph here, showing the near disappearance of measles BEFORE THE VAX EXISTED:
Wow. I am 60 years old and I have had FOUR (4) MMR vaccines. My mom was of the belief that vaccines were absolutely vital and I needed them to survive childhood. I still got the mumps and had the chicken pox more than once. I now feel that I somehow harmed my daughter (now 27 y/o) as she had all the vaccines I did and then some. I wonder if I have damaged her health.
First of all, when you count measles deaths, are you ignoring people who had measles and some other morbidity? In that case, what really counts is whether the person would have died if they never had measles.
Beyond that, I see no reason not to remove MMRV from the market (specifically Merck).
It was added for convenience in 2005 by Merck. Just last October it is no longer recommended for children under age 4. How about removing MMRV complete.
And how about bringing back the Measles vaccine, which was discontinued for the Western world by early 2010. Certainly the risk due to just a Measles vaccine should be much less than getting all 4 vaccines at the same time. Let parents have a choice not to get vaccines for mumps and rubella.
This report is going to have a seismic impact on the CDC childhood vaccines. Millions of parents (including myself) cannot thank you, Dr. McCullough and the McCullough team enough for this critical analysis.
I disagree it will have a seismic impact. All jab shills have to do is say there would have been so many measles deaths without the jabs, they are a net benefit. That can be countered by extrapolating from pre-jab measles death rates, etc. But that's not hard numbers like here. Any time you get away from hard numbers, they win because they've owned the messengers, and can get away with as much nonsense as they need.
For now the measles jabs are safe as real scientific studies like this are buried and not seen by the masses. Sigh. Show the embalmers’ clots photos and people Will question the safety of the covid “vaccine” … and then the measles vaccine.
💯👍 Especially if they factor in the more accurate estimated Under Reporting Factor for VAERS between 34-41%. Even with that being a conservative estimate, I think recalculating the data would show a devastatingly effective infanticide program.
And, Much Thanks to Dr Nick!
Karen, I wish that were true, but I have grave doubts (as per my comment a few minutes ago).
It is even more shocking to realize that the people responsible for this terrible mess are still not behind bars.
Those people responsible you refer to, same ones rubbing elbows with Epstein a decade or two ago and are now protecting each other from being ferried away to prison.
This study is a prime example of why vaccines and medical interventions should never be mandated or coerced and why the vaccine liability protection needs to be eliminated.Senator Rand Paul introduced Bill 3853 on February 11th, which would eliminate the vaccine liability shield. Ask your senators to cosponsor the bill. House Rep Massey sponsored Bill 4668 to end the vaccine liability shield carve out. democracy.io
Giving a child more than one vaccine at a time has always been insanity. If there is an adverse, even deadly, reaction how is the parent, doctor, or health system to know which vaccine caused the adverse event.
I won't even allow my dogs to get 2 vaccines at the same time.
Are we supposed to be surprised that man-made chemicals forced upon children by a greedy corrupt pharmaceutical industry was more harmful than natural recovery, inferring natural immunity?
Bring back the measles parties of my youth!
Those parties got children infected with natural measles which provides better immunity than vaccines do. Measles deaths are extremely rare in children.
"If" the vaccine prevents measles in youth, it might return in adulthood--where it is truly dangerous. Let nature run its course in infancy and allow for natural immunity.
Andrew...so true! Just try to imagine that ever happening again?!!! The WHO would surround the house, syringes blazing!!! 🤦♀️😄
They would have a fight on their hands at my house!
Andrew Devlin - AGREED!
FYI, The acrynom SIDS - Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and SUDS - Sudden Unexpected Death Syndrome should also be searched using the term SUID - Sudden Unexpected Infant Death or SUDI - Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy, as it's now commonly written in the medical, scientific, and forensic literature. Obfuscation?
And before that, it was called crib death...blaming Mom for not putting her baby in the correct sleeping position. How is that for adding insult to injury. It could also be called vaccine induced infant death.
Yep. “The observation that the increase in the rates of non-SIDS causes of sudden unexpected infant death could account for >90% of the drop in the SIDS rates suggests that a change in classification may be occurring.”https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article-abstract/115/5/1247/67529/Changes-in-the-Classification-of-Sudden-Unexpected?
Great work. And vaers would only capture a small fraction of likely vaccine-caused deaths, right? The 7 measles deaths is perhaps inflated or a dubious stat. Seven deaths from measles in 40 years? More children have died from lightening strikes or being beamed by a baseball.
I totally support this, but the devils advocate in me is wondering if this can be explained because far fewer children are getting measles because they’re vaccinated?
I wondered about this as well. However, I also know that we have been lied to about the lethality of measles when it is actually quite treatable if proper protocols are used and natural infection generally provides longer and more robust immunity. If parents were provided the a full disclosure then they would be able to make a more informed choice as to whether to vaccinate or not.
PLEASE SEE THE GRAPH OF MEASLES INCIDENCE PRIOR TO INTRO OF THE VAX:
https://le.utah.gov/interim/2018/pdf/00004211.pdf
Makes sense to me. I was born in 1952. Most all of us (mu sister and i and our friends) had the measles, etc and as far as i know, none of us died from any childhood diseases.
Thanks for posting that from Dr. Humphries book! They did a tremendous labor of love getting that book published! I recommend it to as many as I can so they can see the PROOF rather than take my word for it! We have so many family and friends around us with autistic kids that still question how and why!! 😖
I'm sure that will be part of their standard, parrot-like response.
They also won't trust anything connected to the VAERS, as per my own comment.
perhaps. it's hard to say how many kids would get measles if majority weren't vaccinated and what mortality rates would be. I assume most accurate numbers we have are numbers from before and right after the measles vaccine was introduced. And then you have questions about cofounding variables like malnutrition, poor sanitation etc.
Yes, I believe that’s true.
Are they though?🤔😉
Of course that affects how these numbers must be interpreted. Good catch.
Nicolas, I appreciate and follow your work, but I have a sincere request. Can you do a reanalysis using data from 1950s for deaths from measles since during the last decades we have had very few measles cases comparatively (a reduction in cases which is almost certainly due to the measles vaccines). Even that would not be quite fair (to use 1950s deaths to compare) either since medical care has certainly improved since the 1950’s. Could one use changes in RSV mortality as an adjuster from 1950s to now to account for advances in medical improvement. That data is available in National Vital Statistics reports.
I wish they had done proper placebo controlled testing so we could really know if the trade off was worth it. With under-recognition and under reporting of injuries, it is so incredibly difficult to know true harms so as to see if benefits are worth it (at least on average if not for all individuals). ~physician parent of vaccine injured child (twice injured before he got to MMR)
💯 agreed in essence. The problem is also that we have no "unvaccinated" vs "vaccinated" controlled studies going back that far. Or at least we have only one or two recent ones.
Definitions have also changed - "unvaccinated", "vaccinated", "placebo" etc, as well as no distinction between wild type vs vaccine induced.
The point is the data is of such poor quality, intentionally so as to allow manipulation, for so long that it is essentially useless except for sound bitescand fear mongering.🤔😐🤦♀️ even the well meaning studies have enough holes in them to poke an elephant through! However, they should have generated discussion and better scientific enquiry LONG before now.😐🙄
The only way to accurately understand by the current rules of the "gold standard" research, is to redo the research from scratch. But that doesnt sell tickets, win votes or placate the masses.🤫😐 on either side.
Personally, i think if the game is rigged, then the only way to win is to not play the game. Choose different. Create new rules/standards/definitions.....🤔😉
Vaxx industry has literally killed millions and caused some kind of harm to tens of millions. In dollars, the damages are probably too immense to be measured in any sensible way, but we are surely talking about trillions now, accumulated over the decades. I am willing to admit that some vaccines might have been slightly beneficial to public health at some point, but the pro/con ratio is probably around 1/100 by now, if not 1/1000.
As a math guy I have to point out what I see as a problem here. For a fair comparison we need to know how many would have died from measles without the jab (which is unknowable, as is the real, much higher number of jab deaths). For example, if there would have been 27 times as many measles deaths in the absence of the jabs, it's a wash (on fatalities, other jab injuries skew the assessment). These numbers are important, but must be considered within that context. Bravo to Nick for correctly stating there are 2,657 percent MORE deaths by jab. There are 2,757% AS MANY deaths by jab - most would incorrectly say 2,757 percent MORE. To be clear, we are purebloods, never get jabs of any variety, see pharma as the criminals they are, and are thrilled our grandkids are 100% unvaccinated. We absolutely love Nick and John Leake in this house, they are heroes. I'm a proud antivaxxer. But a math guy too so I think this should be mentioned.
Correct. That is why I proposed bringing back just the solo Measles vaccines, which was phased out after 2009, for convenience.
The deaths from just Measles vaccine would certainly be less than that from M+M+R+V.
That's a good point. You really can't do a good comparison unless you do an actual study with a control group and account for confounding variables. If the vaccines were very safe and effective you'd think the powers who be would be more than happy to conduct such studies. I hope this study helps at least in making people think about the ethical issues of forcing vaccines on people with clear dangers.
Thanks for watching out for us, Karen. Indeed this report is a heartbreaker. Time is past to declare war on Pharma and their minions, especially freaks like the eugenics crowd. Doctors still profiting from administering these noxious wastes into kids are on notice. Justice is coming.
To all those here who still believe measles was a deadly disease prior to the intro of the vax:
Please read the genius book by Suzanne Humprhries MD and Roman Bystrianyk, DISSOLVING ILLUSIONS. For now, check out the graph here, showing the near disappearance of measles BEFORE THE VAX EXISTED:
https://le.utah.gov/interim/2018/pdf/00004211.pdf
Wow. I am 60 years old and I have had FOUR (4) MMR vaccines. My mom was of the belief that vaccines were absolutely vital and I needed them to survive childhood. I still got the mumps and had the chicken pox more than once. I now feel that I somehow harmed my daughter (now 27 y/o) as she had all the vaccines I did and then some. I wonder if I have damaged her health.
First of all, when you count measles deaths, are you ignoring people who had measles and some other morbidity? In that case, what really counts is whether the person would have died if they never had measles.
Beyond that, I see no reason not to remove MMRV from the market (specifically Merck).
It was added for convenience in 2005 by Merck. Just last October it is no longer recommended for children under age 4. How about removing MMRV complete.
And how about bringing back the Measles vaccine, which was discontinued for the Western world by early 2010. Certainly the risk due to just a Measles vaccine should be much less than getting all 4 vaccines at the same time. Let parents have a choice not to get vaccines for mumps and rubella.