A bit like saying that since it takes about 10 minutes for snake venom to kill you that you were not actually bitten by the snake until after you died. Nice drug pusher trick that one. Probably the only thing that I am sure of in all the lying around this covid vaccine disaster is that I- and our family - took no vaccine. Thank you Dr Andrew Wakefield. We believed you in 98 - and still do - and not the demons that tired to tear you down - and never did.
We followed the data being published by the UK at the early part of the vaccinations, and noticed this right away. The UK info published responses, mortality, hospitalization, etc., starting with the first vax, and then went on to include the second vax, but ALL information started after that 14 day period. When this was noticed by others reporting on the data, strangely, the UK stopped publishing the data, as it was advised that the data was ‘not understandable’ by the general public.
Yes, I’m aware that the early shots were given primarily to the elderly. The lower infection rate was only because it was still early, before waning of antibody levels.
I didn’t have to read beyond the first line: Current vaccines, which induce a B-cell-mediated antibody response against the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, have markedly reduced infection rates.
In hindsight, we know that this was not true. The manipulation of diagnoses, changing PCR cycles to accommodate wanted results, the use of relative vs absolute risk, etc., made much of the early medical analysis a bit of, well, mumbo jumbo.
As someone who has studied health for 64 years, this "immune response" baloney shows how ignorant the medical field is about the human body.; or did the Vax Industry use this to promote their products...and hide the truth. When a foreign protein is injected into the human body or any substance, except the right food...there will be an "immune response." If it is harmful there will be a very strong "immune response," because the lymphatic system will produce billions of white corpuscles, in order to get rid of the toxic matter, which has been injected into the bloodstream. Injecting poison into the human body used to be classified s a major crime!
In Canada, if you had one shot, you are considered unvaccinated. Imagine the second one on top, and you die within 2 weeks. You're still in the unvaccinated category... :-(
I think this is the most obvious lie of the CDC and WHO, and yet people struggle to see through it. All one needs is a degree in common sense to appreciate this enormous bias leading to completely skewed results favoring vaccine mythology. I think it deserves several frowny faces for fooling so much of humanity.
“This bias arises when individuals are classified as ‘unvaccinated’ for a period (typically 14 days) after receiving a vaccine dose, under the assumption that the immune response has not yet developed.” They’re focused on the humoral immune response, the serum antibody production that takes a couple of weeks to ramp up. The humoral immune response reacts to infections. The innate immune response that protects against infections is on and in the epithelial barrier, and they are ignoring it. That protection can be verified by measuring antigen specific mucosal IgA and antigen specific t-cell response, but we’re not doing that. They want you to believe there is no protection unless you have serum antibodies, a very clever deception. To get those serum antibodies, they are injecting antigens or the message to make them. During the two weeks it takes to ramp up the humoral immune response, those injected biologically active antigens will attach to cellular receptors, causing the inflammatory immune responses that result in the vascular and neurological adverse reactions listed in the vaccine package inserts. Injecting the mRNA message to make those antigens is even worse because cytotoxic t-cells will destroy cells that are making the antigens before they get released.
This fact of case counting bias is addressed in more detail in my book Mechanisms of Harm: Medicine in the Time of Covid-19, published by Brownstone Institute in May 2024 and available on Amazon. (See the section titled "Propaganda of Blaming the Unvaccinated for the Continued Pandemic," p. 322 Kindle version)
Here is a link to the CDC which specifically states that for purposes of counting "Cases or Deaths by Age Group," "unvaccinated" includes those who are "partially vaccinated" (only one shot in a series) and those who received the shot less than 14 days prior.
Yes indeed. Why didn't this strikingly obvious bias (aka CCWB) not jump sooner out of the huge pile of literature and hit every single human with an IQ > 89 right between the eyes?
(1) Let's see now a series of **followup articles** that boost the understanding of CCWB as applied to other COVID-19 data sets from various countries. (2) Let's see somebody we trust, like Peter McCullough, confront face-to-face this very bizarre guy Hotez to hear how he explains away the effect of CCWB -- but of course only if Professor Hotez first agrees to get a professional haircut, take a long hot shower with some kind of potent antiseptic soap, and purchase decent eyeglass frames that cannot frighten bona fide epidemiology experts, pet dogs, and children.
A bit like saying that since it takes about 10 minutes for snake venom to kill you that you were not actually bitten by the snake until after you died. Nice drug pusher trick that one. Probably the only thing that I am sure of in all the lying around this covid vaccine disaster is that I- and our family - took no vaccine. Thank you Dr Andrew Wakefield. We believed you in 98 - and still do - and not the demons that tired to tear you down - and never did.
This situation has been known pretty much since it started. Too bad we had to wait four+ years to have it officially reported.
Amazing how they can twist things to suit their purposes...
We followed the data being published by the UK at the early part of the vaccinations, and noticed this right away. The UK info published responses, mortality, hospitalization, etc., starting with the first vax, and then went on to include the second vax, but ALL information started after that 14 day period. When this was noticed by others reporting on the data, strangely, the UK stopped publishing the data, as it was advised that the data was ‘not understandable’ by the general public.
NHS data from early 2021 showed a lower infection rate but 8x higher death rate in the shot group. Scroll down to Figure 1:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8459929/
Yes, I’m aware that the early shots were given primarily to the elderly. The lower infection rate was only because it was still early, before waning of antibody levels.
I didn’t have to read beyond the first line: Current vaccines, which induce a B-cell-mediated antibody response against the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, have markedly reduced infection rates.
In hindsight, we know that this was not true. The manipulation of diagnoses, changing PCR cycles to accommodate wanted results, the use of relative vs absolute risk, etc., made much of the early medical analysis a bit of, well, mumbo jumbo.
As someone who has studied health for 64 years, this "immune response" baloney shows how ignorant the medical field is about the human body.; or did the Vax Industry use this to promote their products...and hide the truth. When a foreign protein is injected into the human body or any substance, except the right food...there will be an "immune response." If it is harmful there will be a very strong "immune response," because the lymphatic system will produce billions of white corpuscles, in order to get rid of the toxic matter, which has been injected into the bloodstream. Injecting poison into the human body used to be classified s a major crime!
In Canada, if you had one shot, you are considered unvaccinated. Imagine the second one on top, and you die within 2 weeks. You're still in the unvaccinated category... :-(
I think this is the most obvious lie of the CDC and WHO, and yet people struggle to see through it. All one needs is a degree in common sense to appreciate this enormous bias leading to completely skewed results favoring vaccine mythology. I think it deserves several frowny faces for fooling so much of humanity.
“This bias arises when individuals are classified as ‘unvaccinated’ for a period (typically 14 days) after receiving a vaccine dose, under the assumption that the immune response has not yet developed.” They’re focused on the humoral immune response, the serum antibody production that takes a couple of weeks to ramp up. The humoral immune response reacts to infections. The innate immune response that protects against infections is on and in the epithelial barrier, and they are ignoring it. That protection can be verified by measuring antigen specific mucosal IgA and antigen specific t-cell response, but we’re not doing that. They want you to believe there is no protection unless you have serum antibodies, a very clever deception. To get those serum antibodies, they are injecting antigens or the message to make them. During the two weeks it takes to ramp up the humoral immune response, those injected biologically active antigens will attach to cellular receptors, causing the inflammatory immune responses that result in the vascular and neurological adverse reactions listed in the vaccine package inserts. Injecting the mRNA message to make those antigens is even worse because cytotoxic t-cells will destroy cells that are making the antigens before they get released.
This fact of case counting bias is addressed in more detail in my book Mechanisms of Harm: Medicine in the Time of Covid-19, published by Brownstone Institute in May 2024 and available on Amazon. (See the section titled "Propaganda of Blaming the Unvaccinated for the Continued Pandemic," p. 322 Kindle version)
Here is a link to the CDC which specifically states that for purposes of counting "Cases or Deaths by Age Group," "unvaccinated" includes those who are "partially vaccinated" (only one shot in a series) and those who received the shot less than 14 days prior.
https://data.cdc.gov/Public-Health-Surveillance/Rates-of-COVID-19-Cases-or-Deaths-by-Age-Group-and/54ys-qyzm/about_data
I am so tired of the numbers manipulation.
Yes indeed. Why didn't this strikingly obvious bias (aka CCWB) not jump sooner out of the huge pile of literature and hit every single human with an IQ > 89 right between the eyes?
(1) Let's see now a series of **followup articles** that boost the understanding of CCWB as applied to other COVID-19 data sets from various countries. (2) Let's see somebody we trust, like Peter McCullough, confront face-to-face this very bizarre guy Hotez to hear how he explains away the effect of CCWB -- but of course only if Professor Hotez first agrees to get a professional haircut, take a long hot shower with some kind of potent antiseptic soap, and purchase decent eyeglass frames that cannot frighten bona fide epidemiology experts, pet dogs, and children.
They thought they could out smart us, but quickly I realized to trust real life, not their absurd statistics.
Also, any seriously ill patient who was unable to provide “proof” of “vaccination” was defaulted by EMR to unvaccinated.
They are liars like thei9r Father!