143 Comments
User's avatar
Dr. Kevin Stillwagon's avatar

How long will it take them to figure out that the vaccine eligible "high-risk" infants and elders and others with comorbidities are the people that are the most "high-risk" for experiencing severe adverse reactions?

Expand full comment
Liberty Liz's avatar

They know, which is why they're continuing the psy0p. It's premeditated murd€r to thin the herd of the "expensive", less productive useless eaters.

Expand full comment
Liberty's avatar

Exactly, Intentional Cleaning out Hospitals, Hospice & Nursing Homes.

Expand full comment
suannee's avatar

like. my like button doesn't work.

Expand full comment
Allie's avatar

Exactly!

Expand full comment
Renee Morris's avatar

Thank you, Nicolas! I just finished listening to the Prasad/Makary “Town Hall” on the COVID19 injections. WOW. That was a doozy.

On the one hand, heard them call most of us Americans “confused” as to their efficacy (Uh, that’s a big hell No, not confused here!) so “they need more data.” On the other hand, they’re asking for a 6 month placebo controlled trial to figure it out so that they can provide the confused public the next FDA approved booster. Okay, so, when that 6 month trial is over, whatever strain they tested for efficacy, will almost 100% assuredly be extinct. So, will the FDA then ensure that potential recipients be fully informed, that whatever injection they’re receiving is for a COVID strain that no longer exists??

The feedback loop that Doctors Makary & Prasad just jumped through to provide us that ridiculous Town Hall was astounding.

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

this is my reply to that NEJM paper and I praised Nicholas etc.

https://palexander.substack.com/p/pure-utter-drivel-and-tripe-garbage

Pure utter DRIVEL & TRIPE garbage from Makary (FDA) & Prasad (FDA)! Exactly what we were afraid of! Placed to obfuscate & bullshit the nation into continuance of the fraud deadly Bourla Malone mRNA

gene platform, the Pfizer Moderna BioNTech death shots that these 2 men, Makary & Prasad know full well are INEFFECTIVE, do NOT work, waning protection near immediate, negative efficacy etc., & deadly

Expand full comment
Christine Foster's avatar

They all seem to change jobs then carry on with the same things.

Expand full comment
CTheo's avatar

Best comment.

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

they are frauds...they cannot run no study with a baseline risk of zero...they know that...

Expand full comment
lima baker's avatar

....for the love of money is the root of all evil (and corruption)!! No doubt, these doctors, having 6figure salaries, are part of the Fauci fan/ investment club for stealing, killing and destroying humanity.

Expand full comment
albert venezio's avatar

Insane Psychopaths!

Expand full comment
nonwo's avatar

Inbred lunatics!!

Expand full comment
Steve. S's avatar

At risk people would be crazy to get this jab!

Steve Kirsch already analyzed data from nursing homes.

At risk people, such a nursing home, memory care, etc, were slaughtered, by my reading of Steve Kirsch’s investigation.

Not hard to understand: weakened, feeble people are sitting ducks, having little physical reserves left to survive such an insult to their aged bodies.

Expand full comment
Wild Flower 🐝's avatar

It’s time to dismantle the FDA, sue and incarcerate the decision makers for mass murder and for worshiping big pharma’s kickbacks. How arrogant to assume this phony appeasement is going to fly. We were tricked once now we are flabbergasted if not intolerant.

Expand full comment
Dee Dee's avatar

thank-you

Expand full comment
Clare Goldsberry's avatar

Well, I suppose it's a start, but a poor one. They're still after the "useless eaters" (those of us who are retired and suck off the government teat), just like they did when this toxic shot was rolled out in December 2020. If you're an old, retired person you get to be first in line for this experiment!! Lucky devils!

If you're at "high risk" -- for what? Illness? Oh, right, I recall that people who have heart problems, diabetes, other diseases should also line up first because you don't want to get Covid! Oh, yeah. It's doesn't prevent Covid -- so you're likely screwed anyway. That likely saved Medicare billions of dollars!

At least they quit recommending it for children and pregnant women -- doctors don't have to lie anymore, which is a good thing. Pregnant women should have known better all along that when you're pregnant you DO NOT put anything into your body but good food and vitamins!! That's always been the rule!! It's never changed until the global depopulationists came along.

Expand full comment
Dee Dee's avatar

maybe "just the hesitation" will make people stop and think is my prayer...

Expand full comment
Allie's avatar

Didn’t the new policy include “at risk” pregnant women to get the shot, just not healthy pregnant women?

Expand full comment
Clare Goldsberry's avatar

I think the statement, Allie was, I believe, no Covid shots for healthy children and pregnant women (so I'm assuming all pregnant women should not get the shot as it can be harmful to the woman and the baby). I have my doubts about the "healthy children part -- who in their right mind would give an unhealthy child -- presumably one who's already received a dozen or more various vaccinations -- an injection of the mRNA-based platform with the probability that they will get myocarditis or one of the hundreds of other adverse events and become even more unhealthy or even die?

Obviously the answer is a doctor or other healthcare worker who doesn't care one whit about the child.

Expand full comment
Todd's avatar

Needs to be pulled ASAP. Class 1 recall.

Expand full comment
Crystal Allegra's avatar

Jesus, please help us ALL!

Expand full comment
Jayne Doe's avatar

Mass Murderers.

Expand full comment
Randall Stoehr's avatar

At some future moment in the analogs of time....the jury verdict will show exactly that fact.

Expand full comment
James Wobschall's avatar

I am very disappointed the all of the Agency heads for doing this. RFK, JR, HS, Marty McKary, FDA and Trump nominee, Susan Monarez, CDC

They have to know that mRNA is dangerous for use in humans, animals and in all food production activity.

It isn't even a close call to make the decision to ban the mRNA injections, of any kind.

Disappointed!

Expand full comment
Liberty Liz's avatar

Of course they know. That's why it's continuing. Once you give criminally-insane psychopaths domain over your body (or anything else), they're not going to give it up. This is more the fault of the 70%+ of sheeple who lined up for this jab than it is the fault of the psychopathic demons who initiated it. Ask anyone in this country if they like or trust govt or the media, and only a mere, negligible % will say, "yes"; but, somehow, the same exceedingly vast majority who do NOT trust or like the g0vt, or the media, did exactly as they were told by the people they neither like nor trust. In what alternative universe does THAT make sense. And given THAT, why would the g0vt now suddenly change how they operate their demonic agendas when they deal with matrix-dwelling reeeeeetards who are going to go along with... everything? Cognitive dissonance is beyond rampant.

Expand full comment
Rita Skeeter's avatar

Kings and Queens don't volunteer to give up their thrones.

Expand full comment
Liberty Liz's avatar

Exactly

Expand full comment
RAY FALCIOLA's avatar

When I read stuff like introductory near the beginning

"“...High-Risk” Populations (65+ and individuals with comorbidities, including infants 6 months and older):

Vaccines will continue to be authorized based solely on immunogenicity — the ability to generate antibody titers — without requiring demonstration of clinical benefit through randomized controlled trials (RCTs)...."

You can immediately see the subversive genius in all this. Putting the 65+ on the mRNA chopping block is pure synergistic genius. Hard to even compute the SSI savings from the anticipated early exits of the mRNA jabbed 65+ cohort. Just few years off of a few percent of the bombers alone is a government bonanza. Freeing up that otherwise wasted money spent on those in their not so Golden years to do even more diabolical things. And for the stubborn slow death cohort you can strip even more wealth from them on their way to their inevitable reward. And seriously what's the harm? Not like anyone is going to have grand children in the future. If they have kids their kids will swear off kids or be mRNA sterilized so why hang around? You got to admit. These guys don't have Harvard and other Ivy league degrees because they are stupid and don't don't know how to make money

And that little cut out "...including infants 6 months and older.." is absolutely genius. Seems like they're being sensible and cautious and even better, protecting the kiddies. When in reality almost ALL kiddies will be at high risk or have "comorbidities" because they take dangerous potentially health destroying vaccines, not just mRNA, and consume toxic food while being subjected to EMF from before birth. The miracle is when so many are healthy. But they're working on that. The regular vaccines can feed them in to the high risk category making them eligible for mRNA. Pure genius. Give the weak ones mRNA to weed them out early. These sorts of policy master strokes should be studied in elite universities across the world to train psychopath wannabes of the future.

It could be an undergraduate Public Policy 101 course like

How to make it look like you're doing something while honoring Same As It Ever Was

Take that course and you'll be snapped up by the DC crowd soon as you graduate

Expand full comment
The Nigthingale's avatar

👏👏👏 Outstanding explanation!!

These new so called FDA experts are either paid, gutless or power/fame seeking people!

They can’t be ignorant of the harm and deaths from these deadly shots?? Not after 5 years?!

Expand full comment
RAY FALCIOLA's avatar

Yeah. Pretty much impossible to be ignorant of mRNA harm unless you're paid to pretend ignorance or are afraid for your survival both career-wise and perhaps more existentially than that.

That last threat, the physical threat is about the only slack I am willing to give the wobblers. No one wants the JFK treatment for them or their family. When it is all said and done as the saying goes, business is war by other means. The stakes are VERY high on both sides. One side can die and the other can lose BIG money. IE it qualifies for extraordinary measures

The level of "we're going with this" accorded the mRNA assault is frightening, sobering and also completely telling as to their intent. Appears no amount of bad news is going to deter them. The decision has already been made. "we're going with mRNA come hell or high water". This even though they know it is gene-therapy, they KNOW it is dangerous as hell, and they never could make it safe (as Dr Malone one of the inventers said). They also know that it is gene therapy that technically makes us all GMO and if that ever got in to general consciousness there might be hell to pay. Gene modification is potentially Island of Doctor Moreau stuff and doubt people really realize what is being injected. But they're running with it anyway even if they have to fake a pandemic to get an EUA to get it out there. Which they did.

Personally I suspect when you are talking about the staggering dollars already committed to mRNA, $500 Billion as part of the Stargate project for example, I suspect the mRNA has risen to Arkanicide level. You don't want to be too prominent or threatening/effective in blocking the mRNA assault project lest you may find bad things happening to you.

Expand full comment
Liberty Liz's avatar

Well said. Kudos. 👏

Expand full comment
Dee Dee's avatar

right, everyone generates an "immune" response to poison!

Expand full comment
Bernadette Leahey's avatar

I am so tired of these games, their playing with peoples lives

Enough of this !

demolish, the FDA, the CDC, the WHO, and NIH all of them !!!

Expand full comment
sandy's avatar

Karen provides a link to the FDA link for submitting comments for this week's FDA meeting concerning the c19 shots. You may also provide links to articles about the harms of these shots with your comments. Here is the link.

https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/sacrificing-safety-in-the-name-of?amp%3Butm_medium=email&amp%3Baction=share

Expand full comment
JanC1955's avatar

I'm not surprised by this, based on my misgivings about Prasad, and sadly, Makary as well. Seems to me this new approach targets vulnerable groups: senior citizens like me, and those (including babies, I guess) who are already dealing with other diseases and disorders. It actually makes a good argument for those who believe depopulation is part of the plan for these injections. I think few, if any in HHS grasp the growing fury out here in the real world about their very obvious reluctance to pull these products from the market.

Expand full comment
KarlM Alias's avatar

They will have nowhere to hide when the SHTF.

Expand full comment
nonwo's avatar

When will that be? I don’t see it happening. All our politicians are tightly controlled.

Expand full comment
Liberty Liz's avatar

And WeThePeople, who are constitutionally responsible for making the SHTF, will, as usual, do nothing... which is why this (and many other) ongoing sh!t shows continue, ad nauseum.

Expand full comment
nonwo's avatar

🎯

Expand full comment
KarlM Alias's avatar

It won't be politicians going after them, they will be too busy running away as well.

Expand full comment
nonwo's avatar

lol! Actually I meant the criminal politicians are controlled by the deep state.

Expand full comment
AJR's avatar

Of course they would! Why would anyone believe differently? 31 million deaths worldwide and too many people permanently disabled too mention equals a “Grandslam” in any ballpark! And it’s much worse than this. But what the hey, those who choose to believe everything is fine & dandy, have at it. Honestly, there’s not much any of us can do about this.

AJR

Expand full comment
Rita Skeeter's avatar

Jeffrey Sachs doesn't know this.

Expand full comment
nonwo's avatar

🎯

Expand full comment
Paul Ashley's avatar

This smacks of a political need to protect people involved in promoting this deadly concoction. It may also be designed to keep alive the idea of the mRNA platform (and it's inherent rapid rollout "feature") being mankind's savior - when it's really only big Pharma's savior.

As a 71 year-old who takes an immunosuppressant for an autoimmune condition, and thus in the cohort recommended to take the jab, there is no way I would allow this stuff into my body. I have a tough time fighting off infections and I can't imagine how my low-intensity immune system would handle millions of SARS-CoV-2 spike floating around telling that system to attack and kill invaded cells - possibly in perpetuity. Perhaps I'm just a silly layman, but it makes ZERO sense to me, especially considering the safer options available to combat something that's not even much or threat anymore.

This punt by the FDA is very disappointing and I only pray that by now enough people have the sense to reject efforts by anyone to inject this poison into them.

Expand full comment