53 Comments
User's avatar
albert venezio's avatar

Thank you for this Excellent Exposure Nick! Horrifying, Disgusting, Psychotic!!!

Rosa's avatar

Were you surprised? I’m just surprised that there was a retraction.

albert venezio's avatar

No I'm not as I have been following this for years but I have moved to calling out the Monsters!

Their doing the retraction demonstrates a kink in their armor!

Michelle Boivin's avatar

I suspect most of the "gluten intolerance" that people have been diagnosed with over the past decade is really glyphosate intolerance.

Paul's avatar

No shit

Peanut allergy too

James O'Reilly's avatar

I am convinced of this.

Michele Linehan's avatar

I wonder the same thing, Michelle. I've been diagnosed with Celiac Disease. I have friends who have Celia and yet they could eat wheat grown in Europe. They have been allowed to poison our food.

LadyTrilo's avatar

CONgress is getting ready to give these evil liars immunity like they gave their equally evil cohort Big Pharma immunity on childhood vaccines. Of which we just recently learned that children DIED from the ConVid vaccines. And they have zero responsibility.

sandy's avatar

Write congress and tell them not to pass immunity for pesticide...manufacturers.

Paul's avatar

Congress is the enemy

letterwriter's avatar

Start calling them and insist they don't.

Of course they may end up primaried anyway if they are an AIPAC capture, but they must be TOLD by constituents how to vote or they won't have any reason in their official record not to go along with corporate interests.

NorthernNancy's avatar

It has been determined that approx. 18 million people died after being coerced to receive a bio weapon produced to reduce the population. Hundreds of thousands were children. These evil beings are interested in child sacrifice.

Mark Hopkins's avatar

It boggles the mind that a civilized society can't muster the willpower to put all involved in deadly deceptions like this in prison permanently. Is this not a form of homicide?

PamelaDrew's avatar

It's great to see this retracted but it is a trivial step in resolving decades of toxic policy and known influence. In fact policy for ALL chemicals in commercial use ignores potential harms and allows absence of evidence to be conflated with safety. Scorecard the global authority for chemical safety stopped collection of toxic release data after 9-11 with "safe air" at Ground Zero and taken offline by UC Davis a complicit actor with Rockefeller-Gates Biotech Mafia that is rooted in Land Grant University system.

"Basic Testing to Identify Chemical Hazards

If an industrial chemical is allowed by law to be released into the environment, most people assume that it must have been tested and evaluated for its potential risks. Unfortunately, this is simply not true. Keeping chemical hazards under control requires information about what kinds of hazards each chemical poses. If the basic tests to check on a chemical's toxicity haven't been conducted, or if the results aren't publicly available, current laws tend to treat that chemical as if it were perfectly safe. For the chemicals being used in large quantities, Scorecard tells you whether or not eight basic types of tests for health and ecological effects have actually been conducted, based on the public record."

https://web.archive.org/web/20120917041002/http://scorecard.goodguide.com/chemical-profiles/chems-profile-descriptions.tcl#safety_assessment

Taking RFK Jr off the court cases helped toxic power too. For decades consumers and activists made progress against GMO crops the primary driver of glyphosate as Monsanto Roundup Ready crops & worldwide marches of Millions Against Monsanto but the movement was derailed by fake "Health Freedom" who talk of seed oil totally ignoring the patent protected mutants and harms of novel proteins like they ignore known harms of mRNA Transfection... the mantra of "Race for Cures" hides known causes.

Last update 2001.. things can't be better now with decades of darkness...

"Over 4 billion pounds of toxic chemicals are released by industry into the nation's environment each year, including 72 million pounds of recognized carcinogens. Scorecard can give you a detailed report on chemicals being released from any of 20,000 industrial facilities, or a summary report for any area in the country. Scorecard spotlights the top polluters in the U.S., and ranks states and counties by pollutant releases. " https://web.archive.org/web/20120213000438/http://scorecard.goodguide.com/env-releases/us-map.tcl

The Great Santini's avatar

What really bugs me is the financial conflict-of-interest and unethical behavior of the regulators. The applicant ghostwrites your approval? Really? Complete dereliction of duty. Not that the behavior of the chemical companies isn’t despicable too.

mejbcart's avatar

There are MANY reasons for introducing glyphosate by Monsanto in 70-ies, BUT one reason is always omitted, namely that it was NOT Monsanto but actually SWISS PHARMACEUTICAL company Cilag, which came up with it 20 years earlier. Even this side does not say the whole truth:

https://truthinscience.org/glyphosate-issue-primer/

because after 20 years of 'black hole' in pharmaceutical research on it, it gets suddenly into chemicals industry. Why? By GENETICALLY MODIFYING major crops in order to make them 'resistant' to N1-phopshonomethylGLYCINE, with glycine being one of the HUMAN inhibiting neurotransmitters. Do we need to wonder why pieces of the NEW genetic code for the genetically resistant plants (via T-DNA from Agrotumefaciens, bacterium causing CANCER in plants!) are even in the SAR-CoV-2 Spike sequence??? One essential reading about it is a 2015 book by Steven Drucker:

"Altered Genes, Twisted Truth: How the Venture to Genetically Engineer Our Food Has Subverted Science, Corrupted Government, and Systematically Deceived the Public "

One needs to realize how important Bill Clinton was even in GLYPHOSATE affair, not only in Epstein files..

The same year, 10 years ago, I wrote a big glyphosate summary for Zen Honeycutt from 'Moms Across America', with further 'consequences' of it not being revealed to me. All what I know, few years later, Monsanto became 'Beyer'.

Sheila's avatar

Go figure. All these corporate conglomerates have been poisoning us for decades. Ugh

Rosa's avatar

Who would have thunk it. 😡

AMV's avatar

Until those responsible are prosecuted for allowing these poisons to enter our system whether it be the manufacturers, alphabet agencies, lobbyists, politician's, the media, advertisers etc., this ritual of the blame game with no results will continue. Thanks once again Nick for a terrifically informative article. Totally infuriating that this continues……

Crixcyon's avatar

MURDER in the first degree. 100% condoned by government agencies.

John MacHarg's avatar

And they are trying to get liability protection for these chemicals they are spraying on our food…they swear it’s safe but must have liability protection. Where have I heard that before?

sandy's avatar

What is the name/number of the bill.

John MacHarg's avatar

AI says, “There is a pesticide‑industry–backed effort to secure broad legal immunity, and a key piece of it is currently moving through Congress as a provision in a federal appropriations bill rather than as a standalone “pesticide immunity” bill.”

Ollie's avatar

We have a full generation now that have been raised eating this stuff on their post toasties.

Barbara Charis's avatar

Monsanto is a real Dirty Word. It has Poisoned the Earth with its Toxic Chemicals and wiped out the Organisms in the Soil...which Provide Nutrients to the Crops. It has helped in Lowering the Health of the Consumers Greatly.

micciot's avatar

When does it cross over into having been criminal?

Cycling Nut's avatar

How did I know about this fraud over 20 years ago? I think there was drama about this study back then.

BertPE's avatar

And now it's everywhere in our soils, foods, water.....everywhere....forever. Better living through chemistry!