Discussion about this post

User's avatar
freelearner's avatar

It occurs to me that one aspect of inherited power as in monarchical systems is that occasionally you get someone whose sole drive was not power, but something else; the reluctant ruler, if you will. The phrase "power corrupts" may have been applicable in older centuries but today, corruption is a prerequisite to power. Quite literally. To name one small example -- Eric Holder covered up the FBI murder of an innocent man mistaken for John Doe #2 from the Oklahoma City Bombing, which was a messy coverup including the murder of a whistleblower police officer, and as a result, Holder ascended. From Deputy Attorney General to Attorney General. Possibly, in the days when people simply ascended to roles by birthright, we occasionally, by accident, got good people in positions of power. An odd and uncomfortable thought.

evergreen's avatar

Has Trump thus far knowingly acted unjustly?

"The campaigns I undertook, some to begin wars, some to make peace,..."

So says Charles.

Trump can say the same.

Why idolize the former and detest the latter? Trump literally dodged a bullet, and his first response was to spring back fiercely. Says it all about the man, right there. You can rip him to shreds for all the political mud he wears on his suits, but he's in the gutter of government doing what he believes to be right and just.

Can that be acknowledged?

52 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?