Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mark Brody's avatar

In the debate about free speech, nearly all the attention is focussed on WHAT is said, when in fact HOW it is said is far more important. Civil discourse appears to be a disappearing art. Can we agree to disagree in a respectful way, or perhaps to pick up the discussion after giving the matter some further thought or deeper research? NO!!! I am RIGHT and you are WRONG!!! Such is the disrespect for each other that is all too prevalent, and the disrespect for the truth that occurs all too often.

Expand full comment
Grant's avatar

I take the view that us, the 'more or less awake', the 'redpilled', the 'resistance', only need agree on a few simple things:

There is a plan afoot to destroy our societies and their structures, family, agriculture, energy, politics, law, to hurt us and kill us, slowly or quickly, and to usher in a new era of digital hell for the survivors.

On these fora, and within this echo chamber, we ONLY need agree on these things. The rest can be set aside until or if we win.

When I argue on these forums, I am arguing things of little importance, details, with people who largely agree, who are my allies. It sometimes doesn't seem that way, here within the resistance movement we have created, as humans do, a hundred separate cells of mildly variant resistance. And then we make mountains out of molehills.

We need to wake up normies, or lose. Wasting energy and worse squabbling internally, ESPECIALLY our leaders, ie Gert vs Yeadon, Gert vs everyone, Malone vs Breggins, etc etc is all just so much wasted energy.

Sure we argue here on the forums. Personally, I argue points when I feel my fellow redpilled have bad strategies to wake normies, when they slam obvious resistance folk eg Kirsch, or Malone, who is alternately hated and loved, hey! Wake up, be sensible! How could Malone be helping the inner circle vampire squid cabal members bent on genocide? I dont feel I would enjoy Malone's company around a campfire and whiskey, but really? People actually think he is controlled opo? Your typical normie on the outside looking in probably couldn't distinguish the Breggins from Malone, thats ironic. And so on. We think there are 'critical' differences within the resistance, hah! From the outside, to a normie, we all look the same. We are making up differences.

And the vampire squid inner cabal members squirm with delight and rub their hands together "look they are eating their own, JUST LIKE THE SIMULATION SAID THEY WOULD".

Expand full comment
23 more comments...

No posts