84 Comments
User's avatar
Kim's avatar

Firing is good. Criminal charges is best.

Expand full comment
PaganLady's avatar

I'm thinking drawn & quartered, preferably.

Expand full comment
Reginald Thibodeau's avatar

Slowly. Perhaps over a three day period.

Expand full comment
Sue's avatar
Oct 17Edited

EXACTLY. Or something involving piano wire....

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

President Trump calls it "draining the swamp." I call it The Great Purge.

Of course, it would be better to just abolish all of our "public health agencies" and the CIA and the FBI, etc. I say, "nuke them, just to be sure."

Just give everybody time to get out of town before we drop the bombs.

Expand full comment
Grube jacques's avatar

5g is the covid. Vaccine is the amplifier, thats the conclusion if Quinta Columbia un Spain.

Expand full comment
csofand's avatar

Bill, I know you have done a great deal of research into the early spread of covid. Recently I scoured the CDC Wonder database for monthly mortality, and discovered that the April 2020 early spike of death only hit blue states. Then, the full Pfizer approval in August 2021 only saw a spike in deaths for red states. Please take a look:

https://open.substack.com/pub/csofand/p/reflection?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1ldnqe

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

Thank you. Note also how the huge "Covid" death spikes from November 2020 through February 2021" followed the roll-out of that year's flu shot.

If there was no noticeable spike in all-cause deaths before mid-March 2020 and if the virus was spreading widely by, say, November 2019, why weren't people dying in huge numbers?

I think the Iatrogenic death numbers in hospitals and nursing homes must be staggering.

Expand full comment
csofand's avatar

Absolutely! You should be commended for figuring that out Bill. Those April 2020 deaths were surely caused by medical practices. The perpetrators needed an excuse for the "cure".

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

Yep. It had to be a "deadly virus" to get the "vaccines." They had to have huge numbers of deaths, which they hadn't gotten with the virus they created in a lab. Per my hypothesis, It was contagious and made millions of people sick. It just didn't kill many people. A death rate the same or lower than the normal flu wasn't going to work for their purposes.

It makes you wonder if all those iatrogenic deaths might have been intentional. Also, all the "Covid death" statistics were massively rigged and inflated.

Then the PCR tests created tens of millions of bogus "cases."

Expand full comment
St. Alia the Knife's avatar

Birx said early on that any death that even appeared tangentially related to c-19 would be called a "covid death". What I want to know is who is responsible for the compensation scheme. Hospitals were incentivized to test, admit, drug, vent, and even kill patients who could then have covid listed on their death certificates. There was no extra compensation for treating and releasing a cured patient. It is no wonder hospital administrators went along with this and forced compliance from their minions. When you subsidize something you get more of it. This is why cities that have giant wads of taxpayer monies to "fight homelessness" end up with more homeless.

Expand full comment
California Girl's avatar

Bill, have you considered what 5G EMR might do, what illness it might cause?

Expand full comment
Jennifer Jones's avatar

🤣

Expand full comment
Lou Cassivi's avatar

Firing is good, criminal action is better, public hanging is best!

Expand full comment
Danno's avatar

What did they know and when did they know it?

Expand full comment
Anna Marie's avatar

Check out Naomi Wolf's work with 3500 volunteers, doctors, nurses, & others waded through the 450,000 pages of FDA documents over the last nearly 3yrs. The FDA knew, Fauci knew, etc. A lot of people have been injured + killed by the jabs. You'll find your answers there.

Expand full comment
Christine Foster's avatar

In 75 years time maybe.

Expand full comment
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

Nuremberg 2.0 entered into the record at the Senate Hearings on Corruption of Science & Vaccines https://youtu.be/VlRqBwNhBVI&t=117m Nuremberg 2.0 recognized by AI + Russell Crowe Movie "Nuremberg" https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/nuremberg-20-recognized-by-ai-russell-crowe-movie-nuremberg

Expand full comment
Sue's avatar

Yes, firing is such a mild punishment! Personally I'd favour something a little more medieval-flavoured myself :)

Expand full comment
Cathleen Manny's avatar

Well, it’s about damn time. Way too late for my dear departed brother, as well as millions more across the globe. Murderers.

Expand full comment
David Vella's avatar

https://www.thegms.co/podcasts/care-standard-failure/

This peer reviewed article describes a more expedient and inexpensive alternative for victims to advance accountability for COVID and “vaccine” malfeasance.

Expand full comment
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

As of December 2022, 89% have not taken the bi-valent booster; 81% have not taken a Flu shot; 80% say covid is not a major health concern; 72% of the U.S. believes the covid pandemic is over; 69% believe covid measures are the worst thing that has ever happened to their child; 66% are taking no coronavirus measures; 66% will not take any booster shot for any reason; 66% want Nuremberg 2.0 Trials; 66% agree with all the contentions of the Chief Justice;. 50% say there should be no mandate for vaccines for school children& 50% of the world now are convinced that Covid-19 was a staged plannedemic, a scamdemic, a fraud, not the top health concern and a massive criminal conspiracy that involved all the countries, leaders and peoples of the world. 44% believe the U.S government is run by The Cabal. 43% of the U.S. will not take any vaccine “for any reason”. 38% say vaccines are not very effective or not effective at all 56% for republicans. 35% of parents now believe they should be the ones to decide whether their children receive a slate of childhood vaccines. Only 20% of adults are “fully vaccinated”. Vaccinations for Florida schoolchildren are at a 10-year low. Despite constant propaganda, populations across the world are finally rejecting the Covid injection. John D Rockefeller of Rockefeller Oil & Rockefeller Medicine made his money selling "snake oil" laced with alcohol & opium and now vaccines. "William A Rockefeller, was a traveling snake-oil swindler posing as a deaf-mute peddler & hawked miracle drugs". https://nuremberg2.substack.com/p/big-pharma-concerned-of-vaccine-hesitancy

Expand full comment
Cathleen Manny's avatar

I can’t stand that label: ‘vaccine hesitancy’.

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

Yep. The fight to rid the world of the scourge of "vaccine hesitancy" is quite telling. Of course, the real goal of the Censorship Industrial Complex is to rid the world of the "threat" of smart dissident skeptics (who want to purge all these psychopaths and ignoramuses from positions of power and influence.)

Expand full comment
Crixcyon's avatar

The ultimate goal is depopulation.

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

I also think digital currency, banning cash and digital surveillance are high on the Deep State's priority list.

There was no need for any "vaccine" and no need for lockdowns.

The coordination among all nations is quite the tell.

Expand full comment
Debra Nolasco's avatar

I prefer "experimental genetic injection refusal" myself. As far as the other, more traditional vaccines, I mention the books, "Turtles All the Way Down" & "Dissolving Illusions" when applicable, & say, "No thank-you. I've done my due diligence".

Expand full comment
this little authoritarian's avatar

Good news. You can simplify it to "transfection" refusal . That's the technical term to describe using mRNA to hijack cells into making a desireduxdr protein (foreign or human). Lab scientists have used transfection for decade ZZs to study protcteein expression. But it was zenever given to healthy subjects (nor should it be). it elicits cvu few rgcytotoxic Tcell responses against any cell expre,,whhhhhhhuhhh7hhuhhhhhuuhhhhhuhhhuussing frf

Expand full comment
sandy's avatar

Warpspeed injection.

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar

We don't have vaccine hesitancy. We have vaccine refusal. Even if there are some vaccines with a positive risk/benefit profile (which I doubt) how in TF could you possibly know? Everything we're told about all of them is a pack of lies. The only reasonable choice is blanket refusal. What kind of moron brain thinks "well sure they lied to us about this, that and the other, but they're being truthful about a particular vaccine"?

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

Exactly. If they say it, it is a lie.

Expand full comment
John Day MD's avatar

It's like genocide-hesitancy, I think...

Expand full comment
St. Alia the Knife's avatar

I prefer "vaccine resistant."

Expand full comment
THOMAS LASH's avatar

You have to be blind and living under a rock to think it’s a safe effective technology

Expand full comment
Brandon is not your bro's avatar

Or be captured in a hospital system

Expand full comment
Renee Morris's avatar

The image of Dr. Scott of the Bay Area comes to mind as a current poster child ~ albeit man-child.

Expand full comment
Danno's avatar

Where you might not make it out alive.

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar

I like your comment. But really it's not true. I know plenty of jab-happy Democrats with decent vision who live in houses.

Expand full comment
Indrek Sarapuu's avatar

"Conspiracy theory".

Well, so far we're batting 1.000, so not bad...

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

"70 Covid Claims, 70 Lies" ... Nobody could be wrong 100 percent of the time even if they tried, right?

https://billricejr.substack.com/p/70-covid-claims-70-lies

Expand full comment
Brian King's avatar

Boy, 35% of dumb Assssss people still walk among the rest of us who can clearly see cause and effect for the MASS MURDER "vaccine" all around our planet. Perhaps some people find it impossible to understand simple observations. Don't let them near anything more complicated than making a jam sandwich.

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

I'd like to know what percentage of the population who got their first one or two jabs later got their third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh "booster."

People are voting - and showing what they really believe - by not rolling up their sleeves again.

Expand full comment
Brian King's avatar

I think there will be FAR fewer people rolling up their sleeve for the next pandemic. But I've also read whereby they're creating a mist inoculation to release in the air above a city and thereby having EVERYONE ingest the jab chemical by just breathing the now contaminated air.

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

This IS very significant. I've always thought Rasmussen was the pollster most likely to ask "taboo" poll questions. I wonder, if in the future, he'll do a poll asking how many Americans have ever heard of or seen photos of the "embalmers' clots."

The narrative might be changing. As I've written, the "risk" of leaders coming out against the non-safe, non-vaccines is much lower today than it's ever been. There might even be some political "benefit" to leading the fight to stop these shots.

Nicolas leads the "courageous discourse" on Substack. Now we need some courageous discourse with our political "leaders," ... who should quit being followers.

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

Have the political "risk-benefit" calculations started to change? I think once 10 to 15 percent of political leaders join our team, 60 percent will soon follow.

I appreciate The Brownstone Institute for recently running an essay on this possibility and the possible sea-change in conventional wisdom.

https://brownstone.org/articles/has-the-political-risk-benefit-analysis-on-vaccines-changed/

Expand full comment
Kalle Pihlajasaari's avatar

The problem seems to be that only a few percent are not on the take and not beholden to the party apparatus. We may reach a clear majority on all important issues among the public and absent tar and feathers the elected will keep ignoring the masses.

Gillen's Flat line is the result, the tools were many but money and skeletons are widespread.

Expand full comment
R123 NEWS's avatar

There is so much more… I keep trying to reach them

Expand full comment
Dave Campbell's avatar

Amazing how slow some people are to recognize the truth even when it stares them in face.

Expand full comment
Steve. S's avatar

So true. Anyone who reads the obituaries knows that too many people are dying suddenly and unexpectedly. I've seen too many high school friends suddenly smiling from pictures in the obituaries, and I'm sure millions are waking up. Actually the sudden deaths seemed a little worse in 2021 ( and I think the writers of the obituaries had not yet started cutting some slack for mainstream medicine, because the writers of the obituaries had not yet figured out what the implications were to the phrase " died suddenly," and how the public was going to interpret that phrase, at that time. These days coroners and obit writers are helping out ).

Expand full comment
Donna C's avatar

They must be fired! Maybe arrested too!

Half my family got the jabs and got Covid multiple times. One had a brain bleed and the other has heart issues. I wasn’t allowed to talk to most family members because I was told I was wrong. I did manage to convince one not to get more shots after his heart issue though.

Someone must be held accountable for the harm and death they caused to millions of people!

Expand full comment
Crixcyon's avatar

Who needs FULL accountability and liability? Trump, his 2019 DOD, byden, congress, big pharma and its executives, the entire HHS, fauci, Marks, Birx, gates, the WEF, WHO and the MSM...just for starters.

But hey, while you are praying that somebody do something (like who?) keep in mind that the prep act is still in force until the end of 2029 which means it can happen again just like before. The protectors of your health like gates and the CDC are chomping at the bit to get another mass murder agenda underway using another fake virus to scare people to death.

Expand full comment
Cathleen Manny's avatar

Crixcyon - exactly.

Expand full comment
Geri Bond's avatar

Thank you Nicolas. The people are waking up. Keep up what you're doing. We need you telling the facts

Expand full comment
David Vella's avatar

https://www.thegms.co/podcasts/care-standard-failure/

Accountability for the COVID malfeasance will not be achieved by a top down approach. This peer reviewed article describes disciplinary action for physicians who failed two core competencies for licensure and safe medical practice in the community.

Expand full comment
Abduraghmaan Charles's avatar

The headline is really encouraging, but when I see only 1,158 citizens / voters were questioned, it really makes me wonder. The sample size is really small to be making such extraordinary claims … or am I missing something?

Expand full comment
Chew's avatar

The poll size was 1,158, which is too small to represent the majority of the United States. I love you all, and yes, the drug killed millions, but this is false propaganda.

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

That is a big enough sample if you know how to do correct polling.

Expand full comment
InfoHog's avatar

"should be fired for their pandemic response"

Strange, I never encountered that spelling variant of public hanging.

Expand full comment