There are two RSV shots called vaccines currently approved by the FDA. One is AREXVY made by GSK and the other is ABRYSVO made by Pfizer. Both are traditional in the sense that they inject part of the RSV virus called the prefusion F glyocoprotein that is grown in chinese hamster ovaries. The idea is that by injecting a little bit of this antigen, the human immune system will build antibodies against the protein before the antigens start binding to human CX3CR1 receptors that exist on monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, some T-cell subsets, natural killer cells, and microglial cells before your immune system gets wrecked and your brain becomes inflamed.
But, Moderna has a better idea. They want to inject the message to have the cells of your body make tons of the RSV prefusion F glycoproteins. Not a little bit of them, TONS of them. What cells of your body will make them? Any cell that the lipid nanoparticle that contains the message will bind to, and just like the covid shot, this will be any and all cells. Your immune system will attack and destroy cells that are making these foreign proteins. This is a really bad idea. But, the FDA will approve it.
With respect, while I’m 100% with you on the Moderna product, I’d love to see more doctors back the car up even further and rethink why in heaven’s name anyone should agree to either of the other 2 jabs you mentioned. It’s just not worth the risk for a mild, treatable virus ... THAT is the guidance doctors should be offering, as Dr. McCullough is doing.
Agreed! It's like vaccinating against the common cold, absurd! Those most likely to be vulnerable are also most likely already using the most effective forms of therapy daily anyway, among the adult population, those with chronic respiratory issues.
I cringe bc, for one, my older sister gets every single shot recommended. With another sister I can’t even mention or ask whether she gets them or not? 🤦🏼♀️🤷🏼♀️
Had family over this weekend after the death of my father-in-law last week and my sister-in-law was telling me that two boys from their Geneva, IL high school died in the last week due to aneurisms, and she shouted out it had to be that blanking vaccine. She and her family never wanted to take them, but they were forced to keep their jobs and three of her four boys were forced to in order to continue on in sports. Now she's worried. I send her your spike detox. I hope she goes with it for her three boys who were jabbed. Of course I worry about them and their boys too as does my wife. It just makes us sick.
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0 published in June 2021 a blog post and fact-check on June 10th 2021 citing an article of December 30th 2020; on how they use false statistics to make claims of covid vaccines efficacy of 95%. The "Absolute Risk Reduction" of deaths was <1%. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has sued Pfizer, Inc., for unlawfully misrepresenting the effectiveness of the company’s COVID-19 vaccine and attempting to censor public discussion of the product. https://nuremberg2.substack.com/p/chief-justice-of-nuremberg-20-published-fdf
December 31st 2020 Claim of 95% Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine: Pfizer was responsible for the design and conduct of the trial, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, and the writing of the manuscript. The absolute death reduction was <1% https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577
The RSV vaccines were both developed, tested, using cell cultures of kidney cells obtained from the harvested kidney dissected out of a healthy baby during an abortion. The use of these cell cultures is a trend that manufacturers want to keep secret. They do not want their products labeled with this information. You have to research the development of products and that can be daunting. As long as this fact is kept hidden from the public, there will be no incentive to find other means to develop and test new products.
I have been in family practice for over 40 years and have never seen any adult hospitalized or die from RSV disease. Seems to me to be a vaccine looking for a disease to prevent. I do not recommend this vaccine for my patients.
Pharma/CDC/NIH: ignore all the massive amounts of chronic disease that is currently increasing and focus on obscure diseases that can be exploited by coming up with treatments that are ineffective/dangerous/expensive/novel. Okay, makes sense.
But honestly, it is the responsibility of individuals to focus on reducing chronic disease risk by addressing diet and lifestyle choices. As much as I would like to blame pharma and public health agencies for all the massive poor health caused by diet and lifestyle choices, it is up to us to take charge of our health habits and make necessary changes. Responsibility where responsibility is due.
There are two RSV shots called vaccines currently approved by the FDA. One is AREXVY made by GSK and the other is ABRYSVO made by Pfizer. Both are traditional in the sense that they inject part of the RSV virus called the prefusion F glyocoprotein that is grown in chinese hamster ovaries. The idea is that by injecting a little bit of this antigen, the human immune system will build antibodies against the protein before the antigens start binding to human CX3CR1 receptors that exist on monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, some T-cell subsets, natural killer cells, and microglial cells before your immune system gets wrecked and your brain becomes inflamed.
But, Moderna has a better idea. They want to inject the message to have the cells of your body make tons of the RSV prefusion F glycoproteins. Not a little bit of them, TONS of them. What cells of your body will make them? Any cell that the lipid nanoparticle that contains the message will bind to, and just like the covid shot, this will be any and all cells. Your immune system will attack and destroy cells that are making these foreign proteins. This is a really bad idea. But, the FDA will approve it.
With respect, while I’m 100% with you on the Moderna product, I’d love to see more doctors back the car up even further and rethink why in heaven’s name anyone should agree to either of the other 2 jabs you mentioned. It’s just not worth the risk for a mild, treatable virus ... THAT is the guidance doctors should be offering, as Dr. McCullough is doing.
Agreed! It's like vaccinating against the common cold, absurd! Those most likely to be vulnerable are also most likely already using the most effective forms of therapy daily anyway, among the adult population, those with chronic respiratory issues.
I cringe bc, for one, my older sister gets every single shot recommended. With another sister I can’t even mention or ask whether she gets them or not? 🤦🏼♀️🤷🏼♀️
Had family over this weekend after the death of my father-in-law last week and my sister-in-law was telling me that two boys from their Geneva, IL high school died in the last week due to aneurisms, and she shouted out it had to be that blanking vaccine. She and her family never wanted to take them, but they were forced to keep their jobs and three of her four boys were forced to in order to continue on in sports. Now she's worried. I send her your spike detox. I hope she goes with it for her three boys who were jabbed. Of course I worry about them and their boys too as does my wife. It just makes us sick.
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0 published in June 2021 a blog post and fact-check on June 10th 2021 citing an article of December 30th 2020; on how they use false statistics to make claims of covid vaccines efficacy of 95%. The "Absolute Risk Reduction" of deaths was <1%. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has sued Pfizer, Inc., for unlawfully misrepresenting the effectiveness of the company’s COVID-19 vaccine and attempting to censor public discussion of the product. https://nuremberg2.substack.com/p/chief-justice-of-nuremberg-20-published-fdf
June 10th 2021 Science on Trial - Evolution, Vaccinology w/ "Lies, Damned lies & Statistics" ft Vaccine Efficacy Fraud by Chris Edwards, Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0 on Zoom, July 4th 2021 https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-trials-2-0/f/science-on-trial--evolution-vaccinology-w-lies-damned-lies
February 1st 2021 13 phoney ways they will use to make the vaccine appear effective; without any testing; and fast tracked. https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/former-cbs-healthwatch-reporter-was-right-who-just-confirmed-how-they-will-make-the-vaccine-appear-effective/
December 31st 2020 Claim of 95% Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine: Pfizer was responsible for the design and conduct of the trial, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, and the writing of the manuscript. The absolute death reduction was <1% https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577
Irishman Confronts a Bunch of Colluding High Ranking Murderers: Are You Worried About Nuremberg 2?: https://bitchute.com/video/9lnLD8vBFAc0 [1min]
mRNA: Reward free risk.
The only immunity it grants is to the manufacturer of the poison.
Got that right!
The RSV vaccines were both developed, tested, using cell cultures of kidney cells obtained from the harvested kidney dissected out of a healthy baby during an abortion. The use of these cell cultures is a trend that manufacturers want to keep secret. They do not want their products labeled with this information. You have to research the development of products and that can be daunting. As long as this fact is kept hidden from the public, there will be no incentive to find other means to develop and test new products.
Sadly, I’m afraid having that knowledge will not sway many in the “it’s just a clump of cells” crowd. We have fallen so far. It’s tragic.
I have been in family practice for over 40 years and have never seen any adult hospitalized or die from RSV disease. Seems to me to be a vaccine looking for a disease to prevent. I do not recommend this vaccine for my patients.
KUDOS, Dr. Sears!
Pharma/CDC/NIH: ignore all the massive amounts of chronic disease that is currently increasing and focus on obscure diseases that can be exploited by coming up with treatments that are ineffective/dangerous/expensive/novel. Okay, makes sense.
But honestly, it is the responsibility of individuals to focus on reducing chronic disease risk by addressing diet and lifestyle choices. As much as I would like to blame pharma and public health agencies for all the massive poor health caused by diet and lifestyle choices, it is up to us to take charge of our health habits and make necessary changes. Responsibility where responsibility is due.
Peter,
Thank you for all your work!
This IS important for you and all…
This piece highlights why the UNITING of The People needs to happen more quickly…
https://newswithviews.com/american-democide-2024/
What about the RSV shot recently approved (?) for pregnant women at 31-32weeks, to protect the baby?!?
This sounds insane to me.
My daughter is currently 16weeks with our first grandchild...ugh, I know they’ll be pushing this.
Maybe showing her this info from Dr. McCullough will help?
Is this another case of absolute risk reduction (<1%) vs relative risk reduction? Using incorrect statistics to tell a lie.
.
I Still Wish Covid Was My Idea.
It Is The Only Way
That I Could Be Getting
More Satisfaction
In This World Of Morons
Than I Already Am.
.
My thought exactly, Spinny. Sorry I did not read your comment before I posted mine.