127 Comments
User's avatar
Hufdaddy1776's avatar

Yeah, US Today excepted the article because Dr Kory and Mary Beth did not give the obvious culprit to the died suddenly wave...the Covid bio weapon(vaccines). US Today even put in a sidebar that “climate change” might be a cause...rediculous!

Roger Kimber, MD's avatar

Pierre is being cagy, & perhaps USA Today knows this & allowed publication because someone who understands, but would like to keep their job needed plausible deniability and realizes that the truth will soon out in spite of the efforts to suppress & hope to get some credit for being on the vanguard in the MSM.

Or at least that is a hopeful interpretation of things.

Phooey Generis's avatar

I agree. (Coming from a book-editorial POV, wherein the same wokeism isoperant.)

Steve's avatar

I agree. It's pathetic and weak. It's the shots. Peace.

Anon38901932047's avatar

Just you wait: Pfizer will soon announce a vaccine against climate change. And unless absolutely every person takes that jab, planet earth will incinerate.

Steveo's avatar

Wouldn't surprise me, but it also wouldn't surprise me to see people in line!

bio terry's avatar

The only vaccine against climate change they will introduce is already been introduced, i.e. died suddenly, stop breathing and farting... because we are the culprits of climate change.

Jessica Libolt's avatar

Climate change causes more excess deaths among white collar than blue collar people? If they believe that, they seriously aren’t thinking critically but then again, we already knew that.

Kathleen Taylor's avatar

"Climate change" does NOT "cause deaths." That's a ridiculous pretense designed to conceal true causes of death.

Steveo's avatar

How can it, when it doesn't exist?

Karen's avatar

Summarized in two sentences!

Mystic William's avatar

Are you sure? Let’s face it the temp pops up half a degree and people around me start dropping like flies. Dying on the streets! 21C and we are okay. 21.5C? Not so good now, is it?

Kathleen Taylor's avatar

I appreciate the sarcasm, William.

Mystic William's avatar

The most difficult part is in my town recently it has been going from about 25C during the day to 13-14C at night. Every day a bunch of people die from heat during the day, and then a bunch more die from the cold at night. This climate change stuff is hard.

aldous huxtable's avatar

That sidebar is just a link to other articles. They do that several times. It is confusing because it looks like it is part of the article but it isn't. However, that climate change article was well placed, wasn't it?

Steve. S's avatar

But getting the article into widespread circulation creates a chink in the armor.

Mark's avatar

Yes, it does create a chink in the armor......but it’s a very small one.

Peter Webster's avatar

Surprised that evil extraterrestrials are not implicated after all the recent reports about non-human hardware etc.

Lawyerlisa's avatar

Saw that too. But that would be exceptional that working class people have different climates.. shouldn't people grasp that?

Josephus Phallis's avatar

Working class people are sometimes more gifted when it comes to common sense… Basically this Phoney Pandemic was an IQ test. If you figured it out and avoided the clot shot you passed!

Lawrence Butts's avatar

But it is climate change! The climate inside the bodies of vaccinated people has been dramatically altered by the MRNA poison. Now it will be months or a few years of “stormy” weather that will end when the vaccinated finally assume room temperature.

Josephus Phallis's avatar

They will arrive at room temperature in the mortuary…

Lawrence Butts's avatar

Notice: Could the last vaccinated person turn the lights off in the mortuary. Thanks for your cooperation!

Steve's avatar

Thanks John. Death by transfection with gene-therapy garbage. The article does not go far enough. It's murder. Peace.

Duchess's avatar

And right under Kory's article is the Global Warming is killiing people article.

They think you are stupid.

Chris Gorman's avatar

Exactly what I thought. USAT is a joke paper, but I'm surprised they actually printed this highly sanitized op ed. I certainly appreciate Dr K's and Peiffer's effort though.

Kathleen Taylor's avatar

I fear it was naive and will have the opposite effect.

Donna in MO's avatar

yes. It's long covid....

JKasper's avatar

“Something in the fall of 2021” 🤔🤔What could it be? What could it be? It’s on the tip of my tongue, but I just can’t quite figure it out.🤔🤔 It just seems like there would be an OBVIOUS cause, but it just keeps eluding all of us. Wonder if we’ll ever know what this mysterious “thing” was?🙄

Myra's avatar

“Life insurance data suggests something happened in the fall of 2021 in workplaces, especially among white-collar workers. “

Now what could that possibly be.....

Roger Kimber, MD's avatar

The editors @ USA TODAY either don’t read the biographies or CVs of their guest columnists, or they accepted it knowing his history and are letting their readers figure it out, thereby protecting (they hope) their Big Pharma ad revenue.

A hopeful interpretation would be that the dam is beginning to break.

At first, a trickle, then a rivulet, and eventually. . . .

LeadCPA's avatar

That was my thought exactly. We need to get this info out there in the main stream media without pointing fingers. If we are lucky, some folks will start figuring it out for themselves.

Roger Kimber, MD's avatar

Pierre is getting crafty in his old age!

Cynthia Ford's avatar

He's a spring chicken, though, you are right, we've all aged centuries in three years.

Roger Kimber, MD's avatar

I think he is old beyond his years considering the abuse he & Paul Marik & the rest of the FLCCC & like minded conscientious physicians have endured from the corrupt Pharma/Federal/lapdog organized medicine RICO collusion.

BTW I was intentional in the wording, even though I am probably 20 years his senior; how old are you?

Steve Kubel's avatar

They accepted the article because you didn’t mention the real “elephant in the room” cause.

John's avatar

"Why aren't we searching for answers?"???

We have been and we know the answer!!

St. Alia the Knife's avatar

I suspect it may have been accepted because they did not state outright that it is the shots and that the editor has had an experience that made him/her more amenable. Perhaps someone at the paper suddenly died or a friend or family member. It is widespread enough that there are few who haven't lost someone within their circle.

KCwoofie's avatar

Thank you. It is a start. But “...it’s not vaccines. What a conspiratorial thing to think that is what it is.” Many sheeple don’t want to get it!

If you had even hinted at that conclusion, many, I am sure, would have stopped reading.

LaJoy T's avatar

Planting a small seed - this will be an opening for more to questions why? It really does not take a lot of effort to figure it out, however, many people can't allow themselves to go there due to fear, guilt, shame, denial... It is, however, a start.

DaughteroftheKing's avatar

Read Ed Dowd's book and share with others!

"Cause Unknown": The Epidemic of Deaths in 2021 and 2022.

PJ's avatar

My health rights group in MA gave a copy to our state legislature

jane's avatar

Doctors are baffled....but I’m not!

Deborah T. Hewitt's avatar

"Sudden Adult Death Syndrome." I thought that marketing campaign went out last year? They need to to add "Sudden Child or Teen Death Syndrome" into the evil plan. This article is the beginning of watching the massive squirm.

Lawrence Butts's avatar

Yup… we have our esteemed medical “professionals” scratching bald spots in their heads trying to figure out why everyone is dying. Dr Moe, Dr Larry and Dr Curly are just completely mortified and think all of these dying people are just being “wise guys” that are doing this on porpoise just to make them look bad.

BAwls's avatar

It is a foot in the door at least. Knowledgeable people will draw their own conclusions

Kathleen Taylor's avatar

Knowledgeable people have already drawn the logical, obvious conclusions. It appears the ignorant will continue to roll up their sleeves. The op-ed does nothing to reach those sheep who comprise the readership of USA Today. Subtlety is not effective with them.

(I hope I'm wrong...)

BAwls's avatar

After I posted I also had the same thought. So probably useless really.

James's avatar

Why aren't we searching for answers? Because the answer is known, but no-one will speak it publicly who doesn't want to get hammered. It can only be spoken on alternative media, which over half the country isn't aware of or believes is a collection of conspiracy theories.