On Hubris & Pride
The recklessness of our overlords is an expression of a deep spiritual sickness.
Hubris & Pride are often used interchangeably, and though they are related concepts, they aren’t precisely the same.
Hubris derives from the ancient Greek word "hybris" (ὕβρις). In ancient Greek, "hybris" is indeed a form of pride. However, as Aristotle defined it, “hybris” is a transgression—such as a sexual crime— performed by the arrogant that causes a feeling of shame.
For example, in the Iliad, proud Agamemnon takes Chryseis, the daughter of the Trojan priest Chryses, as a prize after the sack of Lyrnessus. In his hubris, he gives no consideration to the girl’s feelings or to those of her father. Chryses, a priest of Apollo, tries to ransom the girl, but Agamemnon refuses, which results in Apollo sending a plague upon the Greek army. Agamemnon is thus forced to return Chryseis to end the plague.
The English word pride originates from the Old English word "prȳde," meaning "bravery" or "pomp.” It’s an interesting association of ideas that brave warriors may ultimately become pompous warlords like Agamemnon who become guilty of hubris.
When the Greek monk (from Asia Minor) Evagrius Ponticus formulated the Seven Deadly Sins, he chose the Greek word ὑπερηφανία (hyperēphania), deriving from the Greek words "hyper" (above or beyond) and "phainomai"(appearance), which translates roughly as “gross overestimation of one’s value and abilities.”
When the Seven Deadly Sins were translated into Latin, the word “superbia” was chosen. Latin scholars considered this the sin of sins—the first and most demonic, and the sin that compelled the angel Lucifer to rebel against God and his creation.
In Christian theology, Lucifer, whose name means “Light Bringer,” was the most beautiful and powerful angel until his pride prompted him to revolt. In Milton’s Paradise Lost, he makes the flippant statement, “Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.”
In much of our ruling class—from the great IT companies of Silicon Valley to the labs of Cambridge, Massachusetts to the foreign policy “Think Tanks” of Washington, we see innumerable examples of talented and intelligent men and women who have—partly as a result of their undeniable success—gotten into the pernicious habit of grossly overestimating their value and abilities.
In our new book, Vaccines: Mythology, Ideology, and Reality, we examine the history of the development of synthetic, mRNA and its reckless and hasty misapplication to producing gene therapy shots to immunize against a respiratory viral infection. This took us into a thorough examination of the related concepts of hubris and pride. As we note:
An apt example of the “Scientist Playing God” is the already mentioned Eldon Tyrrell in the 1982 science fiction film, Blade Runner. Risa Peoples, the daughter of screenwriter David Webb Peoples, was studying microbiology and taught her father about DNA replication. Tyrrell, whom the lead android playfully calls “Maker” and “Father,” references this in his explanation of how the lead android, Roy Batty, was created. The code of life consists of the trinity of replication, transcription, and translation. Replication creates identical DNA strands; transcription converts DNA into messenger RNA (mRNA); translation decodes mRNA into amino acids, forming proteins essential for life functions. While this is an endlessly fascinating field, the practical applications of it are still in their infancy. Anyone who claims that all potential outcomes of this experiment were understood is either delusional or lying or both.
What about the recklessness of pushing Gardasil, or requiring 73 shots to attend school since vaccines are unavoidably unsafe? The travesty isn't limited to the marketing of mRNA shots; the biggest travesty is not manufacture but coercion and blackmail of any shot or any medical intervention.
Mankind has the ability to think, to learn and then comes up with answers. ...The only one who has all the answers and knows everything is the ONE who designed the human body.. If the seekers don't ask for guidance from the Designer...the conclusions they draw will fail most of the time.