Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jed Bennett's avatar

In Australia we had a terrible event back on the 28th of April 1996, A lone gunman killed 35 people and injured 23 with a Military grade weapon at a local tourist site called Port Arthur in Tasmania where I live.

This event was the catalyst for sweeping gun control law changed across the country - banning automatic and semi automatic weapons, more stringent background checks and training, restrictions on firearm ownership.

This also caused a large degree of firearm hesitancy in the community and rightly so given the needless loss of human life that could of been avoided.

Are these people who are hesitant now suffering a disease? No of course they’re not. Is someone who was mauled by a savage dog and now scared of all dogs suffering a disease? No they aren’t.

Yet people like myself who have had their lives ruined and put a risk by a product that was marketed as “Safe and Effective” had the side effects hidden, refused medical care once the side effects presented & the find out these Vaccines were in fact “Gene Therapy” never used before in humans (in-fact outlawed), There are over 770 known adverse events & I have to live with life long scarring on my heart & adverse effects after being the fittest and healthiest I had ever been at 37 years old who followed the Govt advice and did the right thing to ensure others were protected (but now we know the vaccine doesn’t stop transmission) are considered to be suffering some kind of medical disease? The thousands of vaccine deaths and injuries in Australia go unnoticed & we’re silenced and shamed when 35 can change the whole country? Something is very wrong

Expand full comment
Greg Pilcher's avatar

Dr McCullough -- you have heroically stood up against government tyranny to advocate early treatment, expose the dangers of the Covid shots, and generally educate people around the world about the Covid fiasco, probably saving millions of lives in the process. Here you helpfully expose how the usual suspects abuse the idea of "vaccine hesitancy" to manipulate people into taking the dangerous injections. The arguments you make here also could be made about the statin narrative. One of your recent articles talks about people being "hesitant" to take statins, erroneously arguing it is only hubris that keeps people from taking the drugs. As with the Covid injections, however, it isn't hubris at all -- it's knowledge about statin dangers and a long list of severe adverse effects coupled with little to no offsetting benefit that have caused many to refuse them. Substitute "statins" for "vaccines" in one sentence of this article and you would have a good explanation for why many refuse statins: "In summary, there is an entire vein in the medical literature that treats statin hesitancy like a disease but does not get to the root cause of the issue, which is appropriate concern over statin safety."

Expand full comment
31 more comments...

No posts