132 Comments
User's avatar
Danny Llamas's avatar

You don’t give pardon to people that are innocent

Expand full comment
Nancy's avatar

Which they are not!

Expand full comment
CC's avatar

*preemptive pardons

Expand full comment
SaHiB's avatar

That's rather presumptuous. While only distantly related to this farce, lots of people have been falsely "convicted".

Expand full comment
HBDuncan's avatar

Despicable! Pardons are meant for the innocent not the guilty !

In this case they violated the Nuremberg Code & caused the death of millions for their inhumane depopulation agenda ! These criminals do not deserve pardons from a criminal in charge pretending innocence. They will fall on their own swords & God will be their Judge !

🙌🏽❤️‍🩹🙏🏼🇺🇸🕊

Expand full comment
Richard Axley's avatar

Don't forget about state courts and civil courts, which Dementia Joe (who shouldn't be blamed 100% because Dementia Joe is non compos mentis, and has been since at least since he "ran" in 2020. Bidens mental state was well known then, but the State coordinated efforts to claim that Dementia Joe was the ONLY CHOICE.

They'll be books written, and I hope soon enough that hopefully some legal action can be taken.

Further investigation, along with (hopefully bragging their virtuosity) revelations by the criminals involved is practically assured

Expand full comment
Peter Jannitto's avatar

The good thing is both Demented Joe and Hunter are now massive liabilities to the deep state. Expect The Big Guy to have a MI, or fall out of a canoe and Hunter, in the throes of grief, "accidentally" overdose.

Expand full comment
Nancy's avatar

And the Biden crime family certainly aren’t innocent! The big guy sold us out to China and he and his family profited greatly! Where’s Hunter?! Pardoned and certainly not innocent of many crimes!

Expand full comment
DaughteroftheKing's avatar

AMEN!

Expand full comment
Mary's avatar

HBDunkin, thank you. I agree with your sentiments

Expand full comment
denise ward's avatar

Is it just me or does anyone else see that we are a totally ridiculous people when one person can decide everything for others? What a stupid convention, and usually they are the biggest scumbags imaginable. This convention of abiding by a leader, puts everyone under threat. There can be no peace in the world under this practice.

Expand full comment
Cathleen Manny's avatar

That’s why I don’t believe in presidential pardons, or Executive Orders. They are always abused no end. I think they bypass the separation of powers.

Expand full comment
AG Fairfield's avatar

Does anyone have the final tally on Biden’s pardons? Weeks ago it was already north of 8000(!) pardons and commuted sentences. This. This is corruption beyond all imagining.

Expand full comment
Thomas Guitarman's avatar

So now watch all the avalanche of EXECUTIVE ORDERS TRUMP WILL NOW DO . BUT WILL HE NULLIFY ALL BIDEN'S, OR SHOW WHERE ALL THE UKRAINE MONEY WENT TO ALL THE POLITICIANS WHO SUPPORTED THIS INSANE UNWINNABLE WAR ?

Expand full comment
Eye-of-Agamotto's avatar

True. However its not so much that having a primary leader is bad, its as the old and very wise saying goes "Power should not be given to those who crave it. For they will always abuse it, and always crave more."

Its also true that those who choose to be followers often choose their leaders with the most absurd and shallow standards. And when their leaders stand revealed as corrupt and abusive, prefer to remain silent or worse, blame everyone else for the the results rather than develop actual principles to guide them.

Expand full comment
denise ward's avatar

Yes you are correct. There will always be people who rise to the top due to their extraordinary attributes but leadership should never be something that is assured like having terms because it means those who surpass the leader have to wait till their time is up. It's all because of conventions that we rarely if ever, question. Leadership is fluid not fixed, and if they are good leaders, they will train others and some of their students will surpass them. We need to take this as natural but everything is forced because of the belief in hierarchy. It's all wrong and keeps humanity going backward instead of forward. It should be the people who raise leaders but not fixate about it. Too much hero-worship which is backward also.

Expand full comment
Thomas Guitarman's avatar

Yes indeed a ridiculous overreach of power considering current realities.

Expand full comment
Ian Hawey's avatar

What, pray tell, could the j6 committee and Fauci have done deserve a preemptive pardon

Expand full comment
Richard Axley's avatar

If I didn't know that your post eas sarcastic, I might have spent the next couple of hours telling you all the reasons, ramifications, and other conspiracy theories that are so suppressed and ignored by State media

Expand full comment
Alio McDavis's avatar

Presidential pardoning of the innocent who have been erroneously prosecuted and imprisoned makes perfect sense. The current abuse of the process is perverting the whole concept and seems to be a dangerously sociopath-ic tool rather than the hand of grace that the procedure was intended to be.

It would be better that such pardoning be completely removed from our system at the loss of a few good people's freedom than using it to encourage swarms of mass murdering psychopaths running amok.

It's time to put the devil in chains for a thousand years.

Expand full comment
Dan McGuire's avatar

If there's any good news here is that these pardons remove their 5th amendment rights against self-incrimination, and also do not apply to future charges of perjury before Congress. They can be brought to Congress, put under oath, and asked to detail their crimes and who participated with them.

Expand full comment
Sam's avatar

The linked article addressed this too.

Does the 5th amendment still apply? Read it and find out.

Expand full comment
Anita Sullivan's avatar

So pathetic! Biden is sinister!

Expand full comment
Allan Postgate's avatar

Clueless, more like.

Expand full comment
Rita Skeeter's avatar

I imagine if Fauci is prosecuted, many others would also fall.

Expand full comment
AG Fairfield's avatar

…along with the sky.

Expand full comment
joseph j ward's avatar

Outrageous! Treason central! Put Biden on trial!

Expand full comment
Mr Stephen A Smith's avatar

Pardons are given to people that have been found guilty. Not before they have been found guilty. The whole Biden presidency has been littered with corruption, lies and various shady dealings. The idea that Fauci can be pardoned just stinks, as is the acts of the DOJ and FBI over the last 4 years. Power corrupts, total power corrupts totally!

Expand full comment
Brien's avatar

This needs to be addressed by SCOTUS, although in this world I am not optimistic about the outcome should they agree to review it. It is absurd and can only be viewed as undermining the very concept of the Rule of Law. Surely this is something that the US judiciary should stand up and take notice of. But alas..

Expand full comment
Schyler's avatar

Agreed. The precedent (Ford's pardon of Nixon) is extremely thin/limited and could easily be distinguished. However, SCOTUS would be very reluctant to take up the question due to separation of power/political question issues. But on the law, the "blanket pre emptive pardon" should not survive a serious inquiry.

Expand full comment
Sam's avatar

The linked article addressed this.

Expand full comment
SaHiB's avatar

The Founders made an egregious mistake, even for Freemasons, with the Reprieves and Pardons clause in Article II, Section 2. If retained at all, it should be moved to Article I, Section 9.

Expand full comment
albert venezio's avatar

We have been a Banana Republic since they murdered JFK! Left/Right BS Theatre for 64 years. Many on both sides, especially Trump and Biden, are guilty of Treason for doing the bidding, for AIPAC - Adelson - Musk and others Treasonous bribery and likely because of Epstein/Mossad Blackmail!

Expand full comment
AG Fairfield's avatar

“We have been a Banana Republic since they murdered JFK!”

Yup. And just maybe, maybe if those other documents are released the Overton Window will shift. I am only cautiously hopeful. But DJT has made such a big deal out of this promise, it’s hard to imagine that “something” won’t come of it.

Expand full comment
BE's avatar

If they haven’t been charged yet, there is nothing to pardon them from. This pardon automatically assumes their guilt!

Also, if they haven’t been charged with anything can charges be brought against them later?

Expand full comment
Alicia's avatar

It totally assumes guilt. Plus, I think if one accepts a pardon, guilt is admitted ipso facto.

Expand full comment
dmickg's avatar

NOTE:

In early December, the 'Justice' Dept. sent a message to J6 defendants.....

Accepting a pardon from Donald Trump is "a confession of guilt" for your crimes.

Expand full comment
Curious and Concerned's avatar

Is pre-emptive pardon merely an assertion of legality? Has it been fully tested in the courts? Will this spread into pre-emptive arrest and jail a la Minority Report? It sure seems like a step further down the slippery slope of tyranny. How much will a pardon go for on the black market?

Expand full comment
KD's avatar

You are spot on! I feel like we are in the middle of the movie Minority Report.

Tom Cruise, where are you? Rescue us! 😉

Expand full comment
David Dresden's avatar

Ha, this proves this criminal is guilty as charged. Maybe we the people should arrest and hang him ourselves!

Expand full comment
Curious and Concerned's avatar

Or create a popular Hall of Shame, both an online one and a physical Museum with two or three wings, for all those who have received pre-emptive pardons, with a condensed catalogue of who pardoned them, and their past mis-deeds, and could be updated as they commit new, un-prosecutable offenses? Another Wing for Regular Presidential Pardons which lists the offenses they were convicted of, and brief explanations of why they were supposedly pardoned. You would need lots of room for all of the Clinton pardons.

Expand full comment