Reviewing Marine Corps Fitness Standards
Secretary of Defense announces policy to raise couch potato entrance requirement.
Yesterday, the New York Times ran a story under the following headline:
Pentagon Eliminates Lower Fitness Standards for Women in Combat Roles
Pete Hegseth, the defense secretary, mandated that physical fitness requirements for combat jobs be “sex-neutral,” a move that is likely to significantly reduce the number of women who qualify.
Reading the article prompted me to review the U.S. Marine Corp’s fitness requirements as posted on its website, and I was completely shocked.
I am an out-of-shape 55-year-old desk jockey who often drinks too much at dinner. On an average day I can do 7 pull-ups and at least 35 push-ups in 2:00 minutes.
This is the Marine Corps’s fitness requirement for boys in their early twenties?
As for girls seeking to be combat Marines — “1 pull-up or 15-push-ups (2:00 time limit).” Really?
What do youngsters aspiring to be Marines think of when they think about amphibious combat? Here are the Leathernecks landing at Iwo Jima, where they sustained 20,053 casualties including 6,140 deaths.
Combat is not a social engineering project. It’s a terrible fight to the death.
Young people who wish to serve in an elite combat unit such as the US Marine Corps had better be able to move fast while packing a rife, ammunition, and other equipment. If it gets really hot in close quarters, he’d better be able to fight with his hands and a combat knife.
Is this really a suitable endeavor for young women?
This brings up an interesting bit of military history. When the purely political/social engineering policy of letting women serve in combat roles was first contemplated, a notable objection was raised—namely, that women on a long march would be placed in an awkward and vulnerable position when nature called them to urinate, as this would require them to set down their rifles and to squat down.
It is fantastically ridiculous to think of the enemy shooting a girl while squatting to urinate. On the other hand, if the enemy’s army contains real men, they would probably be reluctant to shoot girls under any circumstances, never mind while the girls are squatting to go pee.
Thank you for your article. I am the mother of a Marine who entered the Corp in 1999. I remember then, and Alex was in shape, how the physical was tough. I wouldn’t wanna do it. And then the whole thing went to hell. I’m so thrilled that they’re going to bring back some standards in, not just military fitness, but in many other areas in American culture and life. By the way, I am now a 67 year-old grandmother and I won the plank contest at my Pilates studio with an eight minute plank. My final competitor, who finally dropped out, came up afterwards and told me (in the interest of full disclosure) that she was a fitness instructor. She was also about 30 years younger than I was. It only made my win that much sweeter. Nice to hear that you’re still keeping physical fit, too. Pretty impressive.
Yes, well aren't men and women made differently? Okay, so what could he do? Lower the men's requirements and raise the women's? Or vice versa? Realistically, women do not have the upper body strength of men. WWII had WAACs, WAVEs and other female enlisted who were in support positions. Women who want to fight seem to be a smaller majority. If they want to go into combat, let them meet the same strength requirements needed to do same. Can they carry a fellow soldier out of a combat area? That's the question. There are too many things women can't do as far as strength. We are not equal, sorry women's libbers, but we're not and I don't want to be.