No one should EVER be mandated to take ANY vaccine PERIOD.... why in America is this even possible!? We should not have to resort to religion in the first place especially if one takes the time to read vaccine inserts. No one should EVER have to take a vaccine with a side effect of death or serious complications to one’s health.
After the covid fiasco I don’t want anyone anywhere ever imposing any kind of restraint on my freedoms for any reason, especially a medical/health reason. Government is completely untrustworthy.
It's my guess they may, in fact, take this up. The only reason to do so though would be to reinforce the recent Roe v Wade overturn to put the law back into the states' hands.
It will be interesting to see what they do. Doing THAT would be consistent policy for them.
This is the issue of our times. A religious exemption is also a philosophical exemption.
- I refuse to go against my conscience.
- I believe in bodily autonomy.
- My body is sacred / my body is important to me, and I believe that the risks of harm from this vaccine outweighs the benefits.
- I think and act long term, and therefore I refuse to take any vaccine that does not have at least 10 years of safety data.
All four of these examples are great reasons to receive a religious exemption for atheists or a Catholics or Native Americans or anyone else.
A properly understood conscience / religious exemption protects every American from every vaccine mandate. We need this NOW.
Especially because vaccine companies lie, manipulate trials, and conspire with governments & non-government organizations to suppress the truth about vaccine harms under the ruse of fighting vaccine hesitancy (because common sense and good information hurt their profits and lessen their control). Especially because we are right, and these dangerous injections licensed as military countermeasures have been linked to thousands of excess deaths and adverse events.
Probably the one thing that prevents judges, in general, from following all this perfect logic, is their long held lazy tradition for "trusting the experts." Such psychological rationalization lets them off the hook to make a potentially "wrong" decision while denying culpability for being too lazy and reticent to learn enough science to build the confidence to do so.
The Supreme Court should say that all religious exemptions must be granted, and the failure to grant a religious exemption grants the denied the person to the right to sue in both civil and criminal proceedings both the organization and the individuals in the organization who had a role in making, recommending, enforcing and/or promulgating the decision.
Because of the possible harms of being denied involve death and lifelong disability, I hope the court would add something like:
Under typical circumstances of denial (your request has been denied because you took a vaccine previously or we do not think you request is sincere or your religious denomination promotes thus new injection). these people denied a religious exemption are due a multiple of ten times damages and the people who denied the exemption are liable to up to ten years in prison for each person denied an exemption.
Unfortunately, the Supreme Court appears to be more than a year away from opening its eyes to its roll in this massive collusion to inflict harm and infertility on most of the human race, the unvaxxed having suffered discrimination and economic injustice, while those who taken these countermeasures called “vaccines” likely have to some degree changed the way their immune systems respond to threats and likely have increased the overall inflammation at a minimum.
Bill, if the court rules that all religious exemptions must be granted what they are really saying is that the state has the authority over such personal decisions in the first place. They do not. Personal autonomy or bodily sovereignty was explicitly laid out in the Nuremberg Code of Ethics to address the precise question you and others want SCOTUS to get involved in. It doesn't matter if the send it back to the States.. The question doesn't belong there either. Bill, I go to the doctor, he says my cholesterol is high and I need to take a statin. I say no thanks I'm not comfortable with the side effects. He doesn't then have the right to force me to take it using the argument that if I don't take it I place an undue burden on the medical system which then detracts from someone else's ability to receive healthcare. The State also doesn't get to force me to change my diet or dictate what foods I can purchase using the same collective good arguments that were used to cooerce people to take the BIOWEAPON poison disguised as a vaccine. You may think my examples are absurd but are they really? People were being forced to wear masks and mask their kids to enter restaurants and take the jab or lose your job or worse people were refused life saving transplants because they refused to take a jab that carried with it the risk of death. No Bill. No employer no State no court no government no hospital has the right to dictate wether or not an individual accepts or rejected any medical procedures.
You win. Saying no should be enough. Nuremberg should be enough. Mandates should be illegal. Philosophically your position is much better than what I proposed.
Autonomy and the freedom to reject all medical interventions is essential. Statins was a great example.
I do worry about our food supply. Meat will not become illegal, but the globalists are determined to make it very expensive.
You got it. Medical care is not a proper function of government. Medicare and Medicaid are un-Constitutional. Yet people were willing to suck off the money earned by working taxpayers, which is just government-sponsored theft. Education, retirement planning, agriculture-none of those things is a proper function of government. The proper function of government is to protect citizens from force and fraud, whether originating from foreign or domestic sources.
Is everyone aware that Biden has signed a treaty with the WHO to give all our medical rights to that body in 2024? I need to research this more but it has to do with the United Nations and the global plan for one world government - the World Economic Forum etc. So yes, our government is completely untrustworthy and it goes way beyond the concerns related to this court case.
He intends to sign it. It is not a done deal yet. Pretty sure the signing is delayed because many Countries are now refusing to sign because their citizens are pushing back hard. In Canada and the USA you will note how our MSM does not report on this globalist move to control our countries’ Public Health.
The most ironic part in this whole situation is that it requires religious beliefs in vaccines in order to think that they are “safe and effective”. There are no studies proving their safety, since they are classified as “biologics” and therefore not subject to normal medical product testing. They can use fake (aka dangerous) placebos and they can test them for an extremely short amount of time and they don’t even need to look for real result endpoints, they use proxy endpoints that are virtually meaningless in real life application. Most importantly, they never test overall outcomes in completely vaccinated individuals to partially or completely unvaccinated individuals. And public health agencies won’t release the data to analyze public records.
Therefore, the people who believe in the current vaccination schedule are using religious-like beliefs as their standard and they are forcing them on everyone else. People who oppose vaccination are the ones using logic, data and unadulterated science.
We live in backwards world and the root of it is money and power with wanting disregard for human health.
And what about the Nuremberg Code?? What about the refusal of taking an experimental ‘vaccine’ that uses gene therapy and has never been used before? And only being tested for six months or so? What about my undeniable right to choose what goes into my body? Religious exemptions are ok, but what if I decide that based on my information from trusted sources, I do not want these poisons injected into my body? What about ‘Just Say No’?
SCOTUS will leave the issue with state courts. And they already showed their hand by indicating that a mandate can be valid if not having one would harm the general population. We're pretty screwed regardless unless a majority start reading studies outside the ones cited by CDC.
Dr.McCullough, I appreciate your speaking up about what I'd call "the whole vaccine mess"! But as the parent of a vaccine-injured child who is now a disabled young adult despite all my efforts to "recover" her -- I have to say that allowing exemptions to vaccinations for school attendance isn't good enough. There shouldn't be any mandates of vaccines (or CDC "recommendations" of vaccines because people treat them as mandates) in the first place. Mandating any vaccine is mandating brain injury and chronic illness and sometimes even death.
Dear Dr McCullough, Thank you for your reference to the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons Resolution adopted at our Annual Meeting in 2000. The Nuremberg Code, signed by the USA after World War Two, when Nazis did "experiments" on people imprisoned simply because they were Jewish, Catholic, Romany, dissident Protestants, etcetc, forbids coercing anyone into any medical procedure, shots, etcetc. It's critically important for people to know that, and most do not know it. TR MD
The Supreme Court MUST take this up and MUST take this law down considering the Covid injection product is causing death and diseases. No-one should ever comply. A strategy might be to pretend to go along with it, then just start screaming in fear once it’s your turn, refuse to roll up your very tight sleeve, then writhe on the ground with your hands around your neck for a short moment. Pretty sure this might ensure the injector-person will be too shocked to give you the injection. Imagine if thousands upon thousands followed this strategy. 🧐🤔😂🤣😂
Yes, it should be enough to win the case. That is also the reason why early treatment was trashed. Harder to coerce people if there is effective early treatment. Actually, something like 80% who died of Covid were Vitamin D deficient. Vitamin D3 with zinc gluconate and a zinc ionophore, like green tea or HCQ etcetc could protect people.
There should be no mandates for any medical treatment period, whether experimental or not, whether a vaccine or not, regardless of age, from day of birth through old age. These public school vaccine mandates need to be repealed, period. School boards are practicing medicine without a license. All US Citizens must be guaranteed medical freedom of choice to accept or reject any treatment period.
Vaccines are fraudulent science that are neither proven safe nor effective, of limited immunity duration if any, with many severe adverse events and lifelong injury to our children. Read: Dissolving Illusions, Turtles all the way down, 400 Critical Vaccine Studies, the Pfizer Documents Analysis Book, plus Vax/Unvax.
Then let us deal with idiocy of our contaminated environment, starting with fluoridated water and the chemical glyphosate in weed killers....ban both of these dangerous toxic practices.
Those that intend to destroy the Constitutional Republic by way of compulsory multi faceted assaults on it like the Marxist rooted Socialist/Communist attempt to expunge body sovereignty have proven themselves to be wild elephants in the room. They have not only killed and maimed in the most broadly yet insidiously ways but intend to destroy the only thing standing in the way of total totalitarianism. They used what all devils use, fear of being crushed (loosing a job), and money to erase any fears of selling one’s soul. I truly hope this case is successful on its own religious pronouncements, however I fear the public have been so propagandized against religion, that religion has become a source of shrinking disparity of factions within itself, diluting itself as belief is attacked by Marxist collectivism that deny’s words like belief in the name of alternate nihilistic belief. The old method of appealing to the logic of the SCOTUS pre 1960 America, when America understood the value of belief in higher religious authority that tethers human embellishments from destroying itself, same as the Constitution was intended to do, does not sit well with anxiety filled liberal progressiveness or their overloads of the competing with One State theory that has become an enormous elephant in the room and this court fight may be like going after a wild elephant with a fly swatter.
Religious pacifists generally like telling themselves they are peaceful in God’s name, taking a step back in times of armed conflict. Many believe it hypocritical to believe in God and kill one’s enemy regardless of circumstances as in war or arming oneself in the event of an attack. Their atheist secular opponent will tell you abortion is good and necessary on behalf of the mother and doctors’ advice about circumstances, but it is to them war, with cheating, deceit, corruption, and no holds bared. Roe V Wade was about a late 1960’s pregnant child propagandized to believe she would be a hero to women by aborting her baby and SCOTUS corrupted itself and the Constitution in all its Amendments under the political guise of woman’s rights. This is war, when those who deny identifying the enemy for what it is they propagandize naïveté by using naïveté’s better graces. It is wise to understand exactly who and what the enemy is to prevent one’s own demise and to understand the word enemy is not just a difference of opinion. American doctors treat enemy along side of American soldiers off the battlefield because they believe themselves saviors, not killers. American infantry units in Vietnam had to have permission to enter regions and drop leaflets on the populous, physically paying them for losses while relocating them, taking American casualties in the process, forgoing the element of surprise against the enemy and at great loss to American servicemen, but those facts were slandered by Marxist propaganda of the 1960’s who hijacked the war effort turning it into an “anti war movement” hating on America to this day to demoralize it thoroughly. What the enemy has done here is divide two of the pillars of justice by painting itself as benevolent rather than the enemy. The two main pillars of the many tiered pillars of America’s unique Constitutional Republic are the 1st and 2nd Amendments of reciprocity. One must support the other in closest proximity, that is why they were inscribed as such, number one and number two, period. If you are a religious American citizen believing thou shalt not kill you may use the 1st Amendment to argue those “rights” but for six decades Marxism and other hate America factions have insidiously worked to dilute religious belief because it competes with Marxism’s One State theory of collectivism as a ruse by calling it “democracy’s” majority decision which it manages by having captured American institutions through controlled information and censorship. That’s the enemy’s elephant in the room, fear, money, and the taking away of the ability to defend by vilifying those who would defend religion from the chaos that was intentionally created. We have more recently seen SCOTUS give way by abusing their oath for fear of political retribution. Those who understand and promulgate the 2nd Amendment as necessary to defend religion and freedom were vilified six decades ago as war mongers and religion recoiled from defending those who defended it, dividing the two. Shortly thereafter in the late 1980’s the enemy came after and slandered religion calling it the deluded villain, child molesters. Marxism was very popular in elite strategic academia of the 1960’s like Berkeley. About 8% of my Boomer youth in those years of turmoil with the assassinations’s of the three “K’s”, followed Marxist’s like Gramsci’s “march through the institutions”. They hated America, religion, the military, soldiers, and the institutions they attended. Today they are seniors with their offspring in all things American institutions. Most Boomers who defended their soldiers and religion and their offspring have forgotten the significance of the 1960’s with no idea that what we see today is the culmination of the 8% of Boomer grandchildren grasping at peace as yet another international enemy want religious Israel to lay down its guns for peace after the slaughters as the IDF takes casualties trying to protect the Palestinian people. Yet, these Boomer grandchildren loathsomely defend the enemy. Again the defenders of religion are vilified because youth have been propagandized by Gramsci’s academia that believe America and religion is bad, especially Christianity, but the enemy is their friend.
We can only hope that SCOTUS is wiser, but it would not be a bad idea for American religious factions to get down off its high horses of morality thinking they are in fact the Gods that they were not granted to be if they want the support of the citizens who just want to live in peace with a gun just in case God’s tethered law as a brake on human nihilism is over ruled by the plants in SCOTUS who do not believe that American Constitutionally enhanced by religion is valid. This is way bigger than the jab and the coming sister Socialism of compulsory medicine brought to you by the 2008 Medicaid Trojan horse or the medical reset off 2030 when most Medicare Boomers like myself will be gone. The 8% of 1960’s Boomers are now lifetime plagiarizers and sociopathic liars installed in your face. Many of their loathsome offspring have no clue of what an enemy is so they will collaborate globally to become stake holders in the Great Reset to eliminate doctors, pharmacies, lawyers, and insurance. Then you can just text global health alliance with your ailment, Amazon global health alliance Pharma delivers meds, you die. Population control solved. Conspiracy theory # 100. Ninety nine have come true.
No one should EVER be mandated to take ANY vaccine PERIOD.... why in America is this even possible!? We should not have to resort to religion in the first place especially if one takes the time to read vaccine inserts. No one should EVER have to take a vaccine with a side effect of death or serious complications to one’s health.
After the covid fiasco I don’t want anyone anywhere ever imposing any kind of restraint on my freedoms for any reason, especially a medical/health reason. Government is completely untrustworthy.
Yet the Vaccine Inserts for the Covid 19 Vaccine are intentionally left blank. Thereby providing No Informed Consent.
Asking for a religious exemption is a trap.
Doing so implies the State has authority over the bodily sovereignty of individuals.
It doesn't!
The hill to die on to quote a famous chant of the Communist left, "My body My choice". Putting my spin on it, My life, My choice!
It's my guess they may, in fact, take this up. The only reason to do so though would be to reinforce the recent Roe v Wade overturn to put the law back into the states' hands.
It will be interesting to see what they do. Doing THAT would be consistent policy for them.
This is the issue of our times. A religious exemption is also a philosophical exemption.
- I refuse to go against my conscience.
- I believe in bodily autonomy.
- My body is sacred / my body is important to me, and I believe that the risks of harm from this vaccine outweighs the benefits.
- I think and act long term, and therefore I refuse to take any vaccine that does not have at least 10 years of safety data.
All four of these examples are great reasons to receive a religious exemption for atheists or a Catholics or Native Americans or anyone else.
A properly understood conscience / religious exemption protects every American from every vaccine mandate. We need this NOW.
Especially because vaccine companies lie, manipulate trials, and conspire with governments & non-government organizations to suppress the truth about vaccine harms under the ruse of fighting vaccine hesitancy (because common sense and good information hurt their profits and lessen their control). Especially because we are right, and these dangerous injections licensed as military countermeasures have been linked to thousands of excess deaths and adverse events.
Probably the one thing that prevents judges, in general, from following all this perfect logic, is their long held lazy tradition for "trusting the experts." Such psychological rationalization lets them off the hook to make a potentially "wrong" decision while denying culpability for being too lazy and reticent to learn enough science to build the confidence to do so.
Well said. I agree.
The Supreme Court should say that all religious exemptions must be granted, and the failure to grant a religious exemption grants the denied the person to the right to sue in both civil and criminal proceedings both the organization and the individuals in the organization who had a role in making, recommending, enforcing and/or promulgating the decision.
Because of the possible harms of being denied involve death and lifelong disability, I hope the court would add something like:
Under typical circumstances of denial (your request has been denied because you took a vaccine previously or we do not think you request is sincere or your religious denomination promotes thus new injection). these people denied a religious exemption are due a multiple of ten times damages and the people who denied the exemption are liable to up to ten years in prison for each person denied an exemption.
Unfortunately, the Supreme Court appears to be more than a year away from opening its eyes to its roll in this massive collusion to inflict harm and infertility on most of the human race, the unvaxxed having suffered discrimination and economic injustice, while those who taken these countermeasures called “vaccines” likely have to some degree changed the way their immune systems respond to threats and likely have increased the overall inflammation at a minimum.
Bill, if the court rules that all religious exemptions must be granted what they are really saying is that the state has the authority over such personal decisions in the first place. They do not. Personal autonomy or bodily sovereignty was explicitly laid out in the Nuremberg Code of Ethics to address the precise question you and others want SCOTUS to get involved in. It doesn't matter if the send it back to the States.. The question doesn't belong there either. Bill, I go to the doctor, he says my cholesterol is high and I need to take a statin. I say no thanks I'm not comfortable with the side effects. He doesn't then have the right to force me to take it using the argument that if I don't take it I place an undue burden on the medical system which then detracts from someone else's ability to receive healthcare. The State also doesn't get to force me to change my diet or dictate what foods I can purchase using the same collective good arguments that were used to cooerce people to take the BIOWEAPON poison disguised as a vaccine. You may think my examples are absurd but are they really? People were being forced to wear masks and mask their kids to enter restaurants and take the jab or lose your job or worse people were refused life saving transplants because they refused to take a jab that carried with it the risk of death. No Bill. No employer no State no court no government no hospital has the right to dictate wether or not an individual accepts or rejected any medical procedures.
I said No. You shouldn't need another reason.
You win. Saying no should be enough. Nuremberg should be enough. Mandates should be illegal. Philosophically your position is much better than what I proposed.
Autonomy and the freedom to reject all medical interventions is essential. Statins was a great example.
I do worry about our food supply. Meat will not become illegal, but the globalists are determined to make it very expensive.
It's DISGUSTING that we have to even have this discussion about a religious exemption. The STATE should have ZERO say on my personal health choices.
You got it. Medical care is not a proper function of government. Medicare and Medicaid are un-Constitutional. Yet people were willing to suck off the money earned by working taxpayers, which is just government-sponsored theft. Education, retirement planning, agriculture-none of those things is a proper function of government. The proper function of government is to protect citizens from force and fraud, whether originating from foreign or domestic sources.
period.
Is everyone aware that Biden has signed a treaty with the WHO to give all our medical rights to that body in 2024? I need to research this more but it has to do with the United Nations and the global plan for one world government - the World Economic Forum etc. So yes, our government is completely untrustworthy and it goes way beyond the concerns related to this court case.
He intends to sign it. It is not a done deal yet. Pretty sure the signing is delayed because many Countries are now refusing to sign because their citizens are pushing back hard. In Canada and the USA you will note how our MSM does not report on this globalist move to control our countries’ Public Health.
people I know are completely unaware of this and think I'm making it up
The most ironic part in this whole situation is that it requires religious beliefs in vaccines in order to think that they are “safe and effective”. There are no studies proving their safety, since they are classified as “biologics” and therefore not subject to normal medical product testing. They can use fake (aka dangerous) placebos and they can test them for an extremely short amount of time and they don’t even need to look for real result endpoints, they use proxy endpoints that are virtually meaningless in real life application. Most importantly, they never test overall outcomes in completely vaccinated individuals to partially or completely unvaccinated individuals. And public health agencies won’t release the data to analyze public records.
Therefore, the people who believe in the current vaccination schedule are using religious-like beliefs as their standard and they are forcing them on everyone else. People who oppose vaccination are the ones using logic, data and unadulterated science.
We live in backwards world and the root of it is money and power with wanting disregard for human health.
And what about the Nuremberg Code?? What about the refusal of taking an experimental ‘vaccine’ that uses gene therapy and has never been used before? And only being tested for six months or so? What about my undeniable right to choose what goes into my body? Religious exemptions are ok, but what if I decide that based on my information from trusted sources, I do not want these poisons injected into my body? What about ‘Just Say No’?
The “COVID” silver lining. Finally parents & injured children are being heard... 🙏
SCOTUS will leave the issue with state courts. And they already showed their hand by indicating that a mandate can be valid if not having one would harm the general population. We're pretty screwed regardless unless a majority start reading studies outside the ones cited by CDC.
Dr.McCullough, I appreciate your speaking up about what I'd call "the whole vaccine mess"! But as the parent of a vaccine-injured child who is now a disabled young adult despite all my efforts to "recover" her -- I have to say that allowing exemptions to vaccinations for school attendance isn't good enough. There shouldn't be any mandates of vaccines (or CDC "recommendations" of vaccines because people treat them as mandates) in the first place. Mandating any vaccine is mandating brain injury and chronic illness and sometimes even death.
We've heard it before from every state and county public health department in the United States. And most state legislators.
Dear Dr McCullough, Thank you for your reference to the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons Resolution adopted at our Annual Meeting in 2000. The Nuremberg Code, signed by the USA after World War Two, when Nazis did "experiments" on people imprisoned simply because they were Jewish, Catholic, Romany, dissident Protestants, etcetc, forbids coercing anyone into any medical procedure, shots, etcetc. It's critically important for people to know that, and most do not know it. TR MD
"forbids coercing anyone into any medical procedure, shots, etc "
I did not know that, in fact.
It seems THIS alone should be enough to win this case without using religion.
The Supreme Court MUST take this up and MUST take this law down considering the Covid injection product is causing death and diseases. No-one should ever comply. A strategy might be to pretend to go along with it, then just start screaming in fear once it’s your turn, refuse to roll up your very tight sleeve, then writhe on the ground with your hands around your neck for a short moment. Pretty sure this might ensure the injector-person will be too shocked to give you the injection. Imagine if thousands upon thousands followed this strategy. 🧐🤔😂🤣😂
Great idea, Sherry! You go first!
Yes, it should be enough to win the case. That is also the reason why early treatment was trashed. Harder to coerce people if there is effective early treatment. Actually, something like 80% who died of Covid were Vitamin D deficient. Vitamin D3 with zinc gluconate and a zinc ionophore, like green tea or HCQ etcetc could protect people.
There should be no mandates for any medical treatment period, whether experimental or not, whether a vaccine or not, regardless of age, from day of birth through old age. These public school vaccine mandates need to be repealed, period. School boards are practicing medicine without a license. All US Citizens must be guaranteed medical freedom of choice to accept or reject any treatment period.
Vaccines are fraudulent science that are neither proven safe nor effective, of limited immunity duration if any, with many severe adverse events and lifelong injury to our children. Read: Dissolving Illusions, Turtles all the way down, 400 Critical Vaccine Studies, the Pfizer Documents Analysis Book, plus Vax/Unvax.
Then let us deal with idiocy of our contaminated environment, starting with fluoridated water and the chemical glyphosate in weed killers....ban both of these dangerous toxic practices.
When does the SCOTUS have to respond? Sorry if I missed that part...What can we do to help???
Those that intend to destroy the Constitutional Republic by way of compulsory multi faceted assaults on it like the Marxist rooted Socialist/Communist attempt to expunge body sovereignty have proven themselves to be wild elephants in the room. They have not only killed and maimed in the most broadly yet insidiously ways but intend to destroy the only thing standing in the way of total totalitarianism. They used what all devils use, fear of being crushed (loosing a job), and money to erase any fears of selling one’s soul. I truly hope this case is successful on its own religious pronouncements, however I fear the public have been so propagandized against religion, that religion has become a source of shrinking disparity of factions within itself, diluting itself as belief is attacked by Marxist collectivism that deny’s words like belief in the name of alternate nihilistic belief. The old method of appealing to the logic of the SCOTUS pre 1960 America, when America understood the value of belief in higher religious authority that tethers human embellishments from destroying itself, same as the Constitution was intended to do, does not sit well with anxiety filled liberal progressiveness or their overloads of the competing with One State theory that has become an enormous elephant in the room and this court fight may be like going after a wild elephant with a fly swatter.
Religious pacifists generally like telling themselves they are peaceful in God’s name, taking a step back in times of armed conflict. Many believe it hypocritical to believe in God and kill one’s enemy regardless of circumstances as in war or arming oneself in the event of an attack. Their atheist secular opponent will tell you abortion is good and necessary on behalf of the mother and doctors’ advice about circumstances, but it is to them war, with cheating, deceit, corruption, and no holds bared. Roe V Wade was about a late 1960’s pregnant child propagandized to believe she would be a hero to women by aborting her baby and SCOTUS corrupted itself and the Constitution in all its Amendments under the political guise of woman’s rights. This is war, when those who deny identifying the enemy for what it is they propagandize naïveté by using naïveté’s better graces. It is wise to understand exactly who and what the enemy is to prevent one’s own demise and to understand the word enemy is not just a difference of opinion. American doctors treat enemy along side of American soldiers off the battlefield because they believe themselves saviors, not killers. American infantry units in Vietnam had to have permission to enter regions and drop leaflets on the populous, physically paying them for losses while relocating them, taking American casualties in the process, forgoing the element of surprise against the enemy and at great loss to American servicemen, but those facts were slandered by Marxist propaganda of the 1960’s who hijacked the war effort turning it into an “anti war movement” hating on America to this day to demoralize it thoroughly. What the enemy has done here is divide two of the pillars of justice by painting itself as benevolent rather than the enemy. The two main pillars of the many tiered pillars of America’s unique Constitutional Republic are the 1st and 2nd Amendments of reciprocity. One must support the other in closest proximity, that is why they were inscribed as such, number one and number two, period. If you are a religious American citizen believing thou shalt not kill you may use the 1st Amendment to argue those “rights” but for six decades Marxism and other hate America factions have insidiously worked to dilute religious belief because it competes with Marxism’s One State theory of collectivism as a ruse by calling it “democracy’s” majority decision which it manages by having captured American institutions through controlled information and censorship. That’s the enemy’s elephant in the room, fear, money, and the taking away of the ability to defend by vilifying those who would defend religion from the chaos that was intentionally created. We have more recently seen SCOTUS give way by abusing their oath for fear of political retribution. Those who understand and promulgate the 2nd Amendment as necessary to defend religion and freedom were vilified six decades ago as war mongers and religion recoiled from defending those who defended it, dividing the two. Shortly thereafter in the late 1980’s the enemy came after and slandered religion calling it the deluded villain, child molesters. Marxism was very popular in elite strategic academia of the 1960’s like Berkeley. About 8% of my Boomer youth in those years of turmoil with the assassinations’s of the three “K’s”, followed Marxist’s like Gramsci’s “march through the institutions”. They hated America, religion, the military, soldiers, and the institutions they attended. Today they are seniors with their offspring in all things American institutions. Most Boomers who defended their soldiers and religion and their offspring have forgotten the significance of the 1960’s with no idea that what we see today is the culmination of the 8% of Boomer grandchildren grasping at peace as yet another international enemy want religious Israel to lay down its guns for peace after the slaughters as the IDF takes casualties trying to protect the Palestinian people. Yet, these Boomer grandchildren loathsomely defend the enemy. Again the defenders of religion are vilified because youth have been propagandized by Gramsci’s academia that believe America and religion is bad, especially Christianity, but the enemy is their friend.
We can only hope that SCOTUS is wiser, but it would not be a bad idea for American religious factions to get down off its high horses of morality thinking they are in fact the Gods that they were not granted to be if they want the support of the citizens who just want to live in peace with a gun just in case God’s tethered law as a brake on human nihilism is over ruled by the plants in SCOTUS who do not believe that American Constitutionally enhanced by religion is valid. This is way bigger than the jab and the coming sister Socialism of compulsory medicine brought to you by the 2008 Medicaid Trojan horse or the medical reset off 2030 when most Medicare Boomers like myself will be gone. The 8% of 1960’s Boomers are now lifetime plagiarizers and sociopathic liars installed in your face. Many of their loathsome offspring have no clue of what an enemy is so they will collaborate globally to become stake holders in the Great Reset to eliminate doctors, pharmacies, lawyers, and insurance. Then you can just text global health alliance with your ailment, Amazon global health alliance Pharma delivers meds, you die. Population control solved. Conspiracy theory # 100. Ninety nine have come true.