Discussion about this post

User's avatar
akhfitgirl's avatar

yes. it is obvious that you should be able to protect yourself, your family and your property when the government can't.

Expand full comment
Barbara Kiley's avatar

No. Capture and charges are. STILL appropriate…until carrying gasoline, for example, is a capital offense, it’s not reasonable that we execute folks whose intentions may not always be known. What we NEED is for law enforcement to patrol fire prone areas… did you know that. los Angles TV weatherman predicted CATASTROPHIC fires due incoming weather conditions.

When was this predicted? Jan. 1. There was PLENTY of time to organize police, clear forest floor and brush, call on nearby states for help, and open the water from the North to briefly inconvenience the smelt fish, and basically make a GAME PLAN. The city got a clue on Jan. 2, but the Mayor went to Africa, anyway. No one did ANYTHING until fires were already out of control.

But shooting people who may appear suspicious looks a lot like citizen vigilantes tracking “thought crimes.” What if I just ran out of gas and am carrying a can to my car?

No. We don’t shoot people we don’t like the look of. Who thought up this response? I see people in the comments folks think this is a good idea. Who ARE you bloodthirsty people? What we NEED is proper staffing of law enforcement, and maybe special “deputies” in fire prone areas.

Expand full comment
148 more comments...

No posts