Discussion about this post

User's avatar
JanC1955's avatar

"But the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein — whether from natural infection or the lipid-nanoparticle-delivered products — fundamentally alters this threshold."

I pulled this quote from the article to add a reminder. While "natural infection" and by-injection are different ways our bodies become assaulted by spike protein, it's important to keep in mind there is nothing "natural" about the COVID-19 virus. It didn't occur in nature as most viruses do (or did, before gain-of-function ghouls got hold of them). It was cooked up in a lab.

Whenever we discuss the presumed difference between adverse reactions to the virus vs. the injections created to "treat" the virus, it's important to keep in mind that the virus itself is not from nature, and so neither is the infection it delivers.

May the gain-of-function ghouls rot in hell for eternity when their time comes.

May's avatar

I've said it before and I'll say again.. love what your company is doing however you really need to start using genetic testing on patients because so many have genetic SNPs that don't handle a lot of components in a blended supplement stack. Here again many people with MCAS have issues with slow COMT and can't handle any Quercetin.. and many struggle still with Luteolin as well.

(Vitamin C is an excellent stabilizer that's more broadly tolerated than Quercetin. )

The more we're using genetic testing and personalized targeted testing , the more we're finding stacks / blends are difficult to sell because of sensitivity to one or more ingredients.

11 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?