Even though what you are saying is technically correct, I cannot trust any company that has been involved with medical fraud to produce newer, safer mRNA vaccines. Even if they did make genuinely safe mRNA vaccines, why should they get any money? They have blood on their hands! So, while I enjoy your fair and balanced view on this, I'm more interested in justice at this time.
Anyone else noting the change/shift in the wind....it’s called, there will be no accountability.
They are now going to lead us down the path of bygones, mistakes were made....we can learn and do better next time around.
I call BS. BS to any doctor/scientist that floats that idea or path forward without first acknowledging that mistakes were NOT made. The global population was used as lab rats (costing innumerable lives and trauma) so they could learn more about the pros and cons of their precious mRNA, what they call the “software of life” that they have said will allow them to “engineer our evolution.”
Why can’t they leave us the f&$@ alone with their delusions of being God or so powerful they can outwit nature.? Will they ever learn? No, not until their numbers start dying in the cross hairs of what they wrought. Anyone else notice none of them and their loved ones are dropping dead or dying alone in hospitals starved, neglected, alone and anxious.
Before we can “move on” and heal....I want to know how many they killed.
Safe mRNA vaccines are an immunological impossibility.
When your body expresses the NON-SELF protein encoded by the mRNA, your immune system will attack & kill every cell that expresses it.
Ask Sucharit Bhakdhi. Ask any immunology textbook.
How wonderful is it that you can go to war with non-self antigens, yet be at peace with your own body?
We know the answer. When you’re formed, your immune system is capable of attacking more or less EVERYTHING.
But in a grace period, early In development, your immune systems is shown the repertoire of every one of the randomly formed T- and B-cells. Every clone which recognises you, or SELF, is removed. Told to commit suicide. It’s called “Clonal Deletion”. Now you tolerate self. Unless you develop some illness, which we call autoimmune diseases, like RA.
However, everything else your cells recognise is by definition NON-SELF.
Every mRNA will encode non-self, and you will attack it.
The huge push towards the mRNA platform with now minimal testing seems a huge risk. We still don't know what happens to the carrier lipids. That carrier issue was what stumped Malone who never got it to work in practice. Regardless the industry seems hell bent on using it everywhere. A vaccine production facility in a box headed to Africa where most were spared from vaccine assault?
I have seen him wilt for some time now and have decided to exclude him from my daily prayers and good wishes. Dr Yeadon, I hope that your brilliance will be allowed to flourish until the WHO dragon is slayed and its parts and the ‘pathogens’ disguised as scientists that once worked for it, cut up and distributed to the depths of the oceans for the fish. But then, what have I got against the fish! Burn them in Hell then!!
"Off to a bad start"? A flawed "product launch"? I beg to differ. It is not tarring a technology with a broad brush to say that mRNA is a uniformly bad idea that was malevolently forced on the broadest possible population of people as guinea pigs. It was a fraudulent, reckless and willfully harmful experiment. I feel I am describing the crime in the softest possible terms. "Safe mRNA products are possible". Well I suppose safer gas chambers and concentration camps are also possible but I will never have any use for them.
Here’s the broad brush. The opposite of your introductory statement has been the rule for too long. Trust your doctor. Trust the government. Ask no questions. This did not work out. Look at destruction of our society and tell me the whole mess is NOT intimately related to the practice of medicine in the US. Including the lies routinely and brazenly proliferated in mainstream news: look who funds those lies. No one has suffered more than you. But tell me Fauci is not YOUR monster as much as any one’s.
Modern medicine is good at some things. But the vast financial incentives have resulted in widespread fraud. You are no fraud. But you are the exception, not the rule. Look at the vast number still pushing the shots. It will take a lot more than “we’re working on it” to send the better informed among us running back to iatrogenic doctors for more of the same that has produced autism and chronic disease affecting half the population. And you know that is true.
Speak to us of the large studies showing vastly better health among children never vaccinated. Robust health. They don’t get sick. What happened to the doctors who defied the health authorities to do this work? But mRNA shots are fine?
Our daughter was never vaccinated. Her bout with chicken pox was one tiny scab at her hairline while our son had welts that were straight out of the Middle Ages. He had been DPT injected. His 104 fever and neurological symptoms learned us religion on this topic. Don’t forget that the smallpox vaccine was a total fraud: its fake reputation has dominated the practice of medicine ever since.
If children don’t get sick or show only mild symptoms to childhood infection in exchange for lifelong immunity, do they need mRNA? More pollution?
Speak to us of regenerative agriculture that can supply food without glyphosates and insecticides. Show me a doctor who knows what I’m talking about.
Speak to us about practitioners who emphasize health of the the microbiome and protection of the human brain from conception onward. Most doctors are clueless in the most important areas of health. Otherwise they would never have pushed the shots. And the inserts were BLANK. And they didn’t even know they were sourced by DOD contractors!
Change all this before boring me with more mRNA news.
Thanks Dr. McCoulough. There is ZERO chance that any person who is aware of the countermeasure kill shots would EVER use any of the gene-therapy trash. They intentionally lied and murdered, and continue to murder, millions of innocent people. These maggots must be held accountable for all the blood on their hands. IN NO WAY, SHAPE OR FORM, WILL I OR MY FAMILY EVER USE ANY "product" FROM BIG PHARMA. I would choose to die first. All due respect, this is one post that does not make sense to me, in light of the mass killings due to the DOD countermeasures. WE WILL NOT FORGET. Peace.
NO TRUST - that's the bottom line - sure I'd take something if I had no other choice but the medical community has lost the trust of millions - it's clear most physicians rely on what they are told - and they don't get that many of these studies are funded by big pharma - my endocrinologist asked me what quercetin was - let's face it - the medical community in all of these medical centers all talk and gossip so I'm sure they've heard about the side effects of this shot - and yet they are still pushing it -
Yes, but good products are now lost in a sea of bureaucracy and lost trust - NIH/CDC/FDA...
The best way to re-boot the system, is repeal the 1986 Vaccine Act, and let the lawyers at Big Pharma, and their "executives". If we sent 2-3 Pharma Executives to jail, and took their money... the system would re-set.
God knows, I hate giving this opening to the lawyers, but believe it or not, we need their dirty tricks, WHICH DO NOT GO INTO ANYONES BODY, to counter Big Pharma's BIGGER dirty tricks. When Regan signed the 1986 Vaccine Act, he kind of knew this day was coming, and oh yea, The NY Times did REAL journalism:
If Mr. Reagan really had serious reservations about the compensation program, then he was wrong to have signed it. He should have insisted protections be added to the bill, and they could have easily been included by a good lawyer. Yes, we do have good lawyers. Good lawyers who are also good men and women. I'll tell you what, after what our medical community has done, I will never put down "lawyers" again. They work long hours, and the ones who get settlements for people who have been injured deserve some of the money. They did the work. No one else pays them.
I understand the general concept here - that 'one day' this sort of technology could be beneficial.
Accepting the spike protein is an issue, I don't think it's all about that.
In Australia not one mRNA product had been released for use in even a very select group at the time of these vaccines, though inventors had been working on it for decades. I imagine the inventors already knew that multiple injections of an LNP were far from feasible.
We can go along with blue sky thinking on future mRNA products, but not allow the promise to obscure the reality. The public is trained to think well of GM pesticide crops on the promise of beneficial inventions. For example, "Golden Rice" is a classic, pulled out of the drawer every couple of years to promote goodwill. But the beta carotene rapidly degrades unless the rice is stored in very cold fridges, and beta carotene is easier to find in green leaves on the roadside.
Here's another GMO "beneficial invention" that has been used to halo the GM pesticide crops... a product marketed on ABC science and children's shows as a "high omega 3" soy. Monsanto GM transfected the plants to produce two 'natural' proteins (desaturases), one from a primula and one from a fungus. These proteins randomly knocked around the developing soybeans, creating omega 3's out of omega 6's. Only thing is, the predominant omega 3 was SDA (steriodonic acid), an omega 3 not typically in our food, and one that could be harvested directly from toxic weeds growing in Australian paddocks if we truly wanted it. And while theses desaturases were knocking around they also increased the trans fat levels in the soybeans. These imperfections didn't stop the ABC science/kids shows marketing it as beneficial, just like fish oil. So the science buffs/kids can think the GM pesticide crops (99.99%) aren't great but there are very beneficial inventions.
And I can't help thinking that the "beneficial" mRNA inventions will be used for Exactly The Same purpose - as a cover for the continued rollout of dangerous mRNA vaxes.
NB: I don't think this soybean is in commercial production, for obvious reasons.
These products were designed to injure, maim and kill.
I would give these new platform products a small chance of utility in bespoke interventions where treatments & surgery have failed or considered inappropriate and where there’s information about the patients tumour.
That’s about it.
In public health? NEVER.
Autoimmune responses are built into the way the technology works.
It’s in the first couple of chapters of any immunology primer.
I went to a friend’s funeral this past Saturday. He died very suddenly of a massive heart attack. He had developed A-fib since he had at least two Moderna shots in 2021. 66 yo. Although his father died from heart disease, I couldn’t help but wonder if he still died prematurely because nowadays there are more treatments for heart disease than 40 years ago when his own father had died. In fact he had an upcoming appt with a cardiologist but didn’t make it to.
Thank you Dr. Yeadon. I hope you are faring well through the madness! You know the Humanity thanks you and appreciates all your work & efforts towards bringing awareness and hopefully stopping the train.🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Big Pharma and a tyrannical US govt and their NGOs are the issue and the medical establishment as a whole needs to be totally rebuilt and the physician and the patient relationship restored and "informed consent" as a mandatory document, signed by the patient and entered into the medical record. I am pessimistic. Homeopathy and natural remedies are my preferred first line of treatment unless life threatening such as cancers, etc.
Even with cancers, do your research. For my cancer, I refused to do any chemo, radiation, or have certain areas cut out until we knew more. Hospitals around here considered cancer surgery ELECTIVE, so I researched surgeons and traveled to MD Anderson for my surgery. Even there, I had to prove my point with one of the surgeons, but I got what made sense, and it turns out I had been RIGHT. The other surgery did not need to be done. So, even when you are at an excellent medical center, sometimes you need to argue for what you know is correct. I had researched a long time. The GOOD thing was that my main cancer surgeon there ALLOWED me to argue with the other surgeon, and he sat by me as I did so.
Ralph Moss and his family have done excellent work highlighting the entire world of cancer since the 70s...when he refused to lie about a beloved researcher at Sloan-Kettering!
It’s interesting that cancer is mentioned as being an allopath go-to disease. That’s the one disease I wouldn’t trust the medical cartel with!! There are, and have been for decades cures for cancer by bright doctors who were censored and persecuted by the FDA. People suffering from diagnosed terminal ‘incurable’ pancreatic are still alive and are living another 20 years or more. To me, after experiencing the past four years, the allopath and their cohort in crime, the pharmacist is nothing but a legalised drug business model. Some do better than others. The last three years has demonstrated that conclusively.
Just the shear fact that .GOV and Mugo pHARMA have wholly imbedded and embraced the stealth capture of each other for profiting/ pop controlling/ viral experimenting globally/ have Universities and labs doing Bio-defense and DOD .GOV funded technology never before seen, is quite enough for me to tap out. Figured out to say enough is ENOUGH! Where there is risk, there must be choice!
Having read The Real Anthony Fauci, as well as the writings of many excellent yet crucified health care providers throughout this entire Covid debacle, and now realizing the depth of corruption and deliberate malice in our entire medical system, I think I'm done with it.
I'd say a better approach, long before discussing the "possibilities" of future "beneficial" mRNA products, is to do thorough, unbiased studies of EVERY SINGLE VACCINE on the market, as well as EVERY SINGLE DRUG that has entered the marketplace in, say, the last 50 or 60 years. Let's find out exactly where we are with all these pharmaceuticals before we contemplate future pharmaceuticals. We're a nation full of people on multiple prescriptions for predominantly lifestyle-related diseases and disorders. We need to get real honest, and real accountable, across the board, and continuing to line the pockets of Big Harma is not the answer. Enough.
A very good idea. It needs doing, not that it’ll happen. If it doesn’t, no way should any withdrawn or suspended mRNA based product be permitted to be administered to the population.
I accept Peter’s remark that it might be possible to make an mRNA product encoding a missing human protein or to augment the amount of a human protein.
I just don’t get why this piece has been written at all.
There’s nothing in it to warn the unwary that these are NOT ordinary products made by pharma in the usual ways.
That takes many years and cannot much be truncated, no matter how urgent the need.
Peter is aware of Katherine Watt’s work on Substack, presumably, tracking the painstaking evolution of Federal “public health emergency” legislation?
This placed decision making into the hands of the US military and the HHS secretary, in whose sole discretion lay the decisions to order medical “countermeasures”, using contracting law which completely bypasses normal pharmaceutical R&D practices, including taking out of the loop of FDA, CDC etc. The companies were not required to demonstrate effectiveness or safety, only to demonstrate a large scale manufacturing prototype (if I’ve remembered the language correctly).
This underlies the alleged defence Pfizer is said to have used in the Brooke Jackson clinical trials malfeasance case. This defence is along the lines that “the client, which is the USG, is well aware of everything we did and accepted what we delivered to them despite the alleged infringements. They weren’t infringements because we delivered the fraud that USG ordered”.
I’m fairly sure that’s not verbatim but the gist of it is accurate.
Safety and efficacy shortfalls to one side, Hedley Rees’ decades in pharmaceutical manufacturing, quality & regulatory is outstanding and he was inadvertent at the centre of some early submissions in the early to mid 20-teens where he advised UK smallcos to secure substantial U.K. government grant funding in this field (of novel vaccine technology manufacturing). His deep knowledge and experience communicated clearly to us tells us the owners of these agents never established proper techniques required to have & demonstrate control of drug substance & after formulation, of drug product.
The implications are profound and Peter knows all this (or ought to know; I’d be happy to chat with him to summarise if helpful). It’s this: that whatever your views are about the safety and efficacy of the material used in the pivotal clinical trials, with all their fraudulent characteristics correctly experienced and documented by Brooke Jackson, the material dispensed into billions of glass vials cannot be the same material. Literally impossible. It takes years to even characterise adequately a multi step manufacturing process just like building a jet engine. Every time there was a scale up step, the entire process & all of the definitions, testing, acceptance criteria and associated limits has to be repeated, because otherwise you’re likely to produce something different.
Given the foregoing, back to Sasha Latypova & her Substack articles, on variable adverse effects rates. Just look at the very low AE rates with some lots and the extraordinarily high rates, including acute deaths, associated with a limited number of lots. There’s no way the manufacturers do not know this data. It’s routine that the pharmacovigilance function they have collates & analyses all such AE/SAE reports.
I recall Peter correctly stating that, if you treated this like any other new product, in the case of the Pfizer injection, first commercial rollout was Dec 2020 & yet by end Jan 2021, we had sufficient evidence of poor safety to withdraw the products entirely from the market.
Peter correctly lists a bunch of built in safety risks. Does he not appreciate that people just like me had responsibility for the initially experimental “vaccines”? I was head of global research for treatments for respiratory and allergic diseases, a Vice President position. My peers hold analogous roles in biologicals of vaccines R&D. I personally know 3 of the 4 VPs (generally Senior or Executive VP roles, given the commercial importance of vaccines as a category for these companies).
Here’s the thing. They know what I know & vice versa. We shared a common training by virtue of being in the same university system around the same time and would have had common foundational training, very likely owning the same set texts in immunology, biochemistry, microbiology & the like. Then each had decades of commercial experience in research and exploratory development (including toxicology testing, First-In-Humans (FIH) and clinical proofs of concept.
Their experience of so-called “rational drug design” meant that, as the products were being designed, before anything was even made for the first time, they’d see the same, really obvious safety concerns. They’re none of them stupid people. Two refused to speak to me. One disregarded my email (or never read it). One of the two engaged in quite a back and forth, feigning ignorance of what I was talking about, before going in to resign without giving a reason. That person was Dr Mathai Mammen of Jansen within JNJ. No one walks from SVP roles without a very good reason, because they leave many millions of $ on the table in deferred compensation.
I expect Peter knows all of this and more. Though short & mostly critical about these products, he leaves open the door to “improved” versions. I’m sorry, but respectfully, this is a serious mistake. Why do I say that? We’ve been told that mRNA VACCINE manufacturing plants are being built on every continent. Governments in numerous countries have announced that they’ve agreed business terms to acquire sufficient of future “vaccines” on this mRNA technology to inject each citizen, woman, TEN MORE TIMES!!
I wonder how they plan to coerce or mandate these injurious compounds?
So, please be unequivocal. We’re living in an active crime scene. Not the time to start reviewing the government’s depleted uranium projectiles.
Thank you Dr. Yeadon. All this is confusing bc I thought Dr. McCullough was aware and against them. Wondering if they got to him somehow? Jabbing each human 10x is tantamount to sheer torture of humans beyond anything I ever could have imagined.
As a vaccine injured person, I would prefer all efforts going forward were to finding ways to mitigate the damage done to me and so many others. They have taken my healthy life away from me but I would prefer to have that back than have them in jail. I believe many injured, maimed and dead would agree.
Even though what you are saying is technically correct, I cannot trust any company that has been involved with medical fraud to produce newer, safer mRNA vaccines. Even if they did make genuinely safe mRNA vaccines, why should they get any money? They have blood on their hands! So, while I enjoy your fair and balanced view on this, I'm more interested in justice at this time.
Anyone else noting the change/shift in the wind....it’s called, there will be no accountability.
They are now going to lead us down the path of bygones, mistakes were made....we can learn and do better next time around.
I call BS. BS to any doctor/scientist that floats that idea or path forward without first acknowledging that mistakes were NOT made. The global population was used as lab rats (costing innumerable lives and trauma) so they could learn more about the pros and cons of their precious mRNA, what they call the “software of life” that they have said will allow them to “engineer our evolution.”
Why can’t they leave us the f&$@ alone with their delusions of being God or so powerful they can outwit nature.? Will they ever learn? No, not until their numbers start dying in the cross hairs of what they wrought. Anyone else notice none of them and their loved ones are dropping dead or dying alone in hospitals starved, neglected, alone and anxious.
Before we can “move on” and heal....I want to know how many they killed.
That’s why I agonised to Margaret Anna Alice and why she wrote her powerful poem, “Mistakes were not made”, narrated brilliantly by Dr Tess Lawrie.
Please folks, do not give house room to the “cock up, not conspiracy” arguments.
It’s definitely conspiracy.
Multiple decades leading so called rational drug design tells me this.
There’s no possibility that those who designed these thought they might be safe and effective. None whatsoever.
Best wishes
Mike
Even if we allow them to say it was “negligence”...,HOW MANY?!
Safe mRNA vaccines are an immunological impossibility.
When your body expresses the NON-SELF protein encoded by the mRNA, your immune system will attack & kill every cell that expresses it.
Ask Sucharit Bhakdhi. Ask any immunology textbook.
How wonderful is it that you can go to war with non-self antigens, yet be at peace with your own body?
We know the answer. When you’re formed, your immune system is capable of attacking more or less EVERYTHING.
But in a grace period, early In development, your immune systems is shown the repertoire of every one of the randomly formed T- and B-cells. Every clone which recognises you, or SELF, is removed. Told to commit suicide. It’s called “Clonal Deletion”. Now you tolerate self. Unless you develop some illness, which we call autoimmune diseases, like RA.
However, everything else your cells recognise is by definition NON-SELF.
Every mRNA will encode non-self, and you will attack it.
It guarantees tissue injury.
Please do not accept any such product.
Best wishes
Mike
Thanks Dr. Yeadon. I agree 100%. NEVER mRNA. It's a business model that has nothing to do with health. Peace. :-)
The huge push towards the mRNA platform with now minimal testing seems a huge risk. We still don't know what happens to the carrier lipids. That carrier issue was what stumped Malone who never got it to work in practice. Regardless the industry seems hell bent on using it everywhere. A vaccine production facility in a box headed to Africa where most were spared from vaccine assault?
It’s a lethal instrument. I think that’s why they wanted to inject everyone & why they’ll use it again.
I’m regarding it as a gun to the heads of the informed.
I’m stunned by Dr. McCullough’s stance???
I have seen him wilt for some time now and have decided to exclude him from my daily prayers and good wishes. Dr Yeadon, I hope that your brilliance will be allowed to flourish until the WHO dragon is slayed and its parts and the ‘pathogens’ disguised as scientists that once worked for it, cut up and distributed to the depths of the oceans for the fish. But then, what have I got against the fish! Burn them in Hell then!!
That’s pretty ugly sounding. I hope you dont mean it.
100%. They are murderers. Big pharma does not manufacture any "good" products. It is 100% rubbish. Lock them up and throw away the key. Peace.
"Off to a bad start"? A flawed "product launch"? I beg to differ. It is not tarring a technology with a broad brush to say that mRNA is a uniformly bad idea that was malevolently forced on the broadest possible population of people as guinea pigs. It was a fraudulent, reckless and willfully harmful experiment. I feel I am describing the crime in the softest possible terms. "Safe mRNA products are possible". Well I suppose safer gas chambers and concentration camps are also possible but I will never have any use for them.
Here’s the broad brush. The opposite of your introductory statement has been the rule for too long. Trust your doctor. Trust the government. Ask no questions. This did not work out. Look at destruction of our society and tell me the whole mess is NOT intimately related to the practice of medicine in the US. Including the lies routinely and brazenly proliferated in mainstream news: look who funds those lies. No one has suffered more than you. But tell me Fauci is not YOUR monster as much as any one’s.
Modern medicine is good at some things. But the vast financial incentives have resulted in widespread fraud. You are no fraud. But you are the exception, not the rule. Look at the vast number still pushing the shots. It will take a lot more than “we’re working on it” to send the better informed among us running back to iatrogenic doctors for more of the same that has produced autism and chronic disease affecting half the population. And you know that is true.
Speak to us of the large studies showing vastly better health among children never vaccinated. Robust health. They don’t get sick. What happened to the doctors who defied the health authorities to do this work? But mRNA shots are fine?
Our daughter was never vaccinated. Her bout with chicken pox was one tiny scab at her hairline while our son had welts that were straight out of the Middle Ages. He had been DPT injected. His 104 fever and neurological symptoms learned us religion on this topic. Don’t forget that the smallpox vaccine was a total fraud: its fake reputation has dominated the practice of medicine ever since.
If children don’t get sick or show only mild symptoms to childhood infection in exchange for lifelong immunity, do they need mRNA? More pollution?
Speak to us of regenerative agriculture that can supply food without glyphosates and insecticides. Show me a doctor who knows what I’m talking about.
Speak to us about practitioners who emphasize health of the the microbiome and protection of the human brain from conception onward. Most doctors are clueless in the most important areas of health. Otherwise they would never have pushed the shots. And the inserts were BLANK. And they didn’t even know they were sourced by DOD contractors!
Change all this before boring me with more mRNA news.
Thanks Dr. McCoulough. There is ZERO chance that any person who is aware of the countermeasure kill shots would EVER use any of the gene-therapy trash. They intentionally lied and murdered, and continue to murder, millions of innocent people. These maggots must be held accountable for all the blood on their hands. IN NO WAY, SHAPE OR FORM, WILL I OR MY FAMILY EVER USE ANY "product" FROM BIG PHARMA. I would choose to die first. All due respect, this is one post that does not make sense to me, in light of the mass killings due to the DOD countermeasures. WE WILL NOT FORGET. Peace.
I’ve lost my trust in government, healthcare, media and my fellow man.
At this point, something miraculous and earth-shattering would have to happen to restore my faith in any of those; I do not see that happening.
NO TRUST - that's the bottom line - sure I'd take something if I had no other choice but the medical community has lost the trust of millions - it's clear most physicians rely on what they are told - and they don't get that many of these studies are funded by big pharma - my endocrinologist asked me what quercetin was - let's face it - the medical community in all of these medical centers all talk and gossip so I'm sure they've heard about the side effects of this shot - and yet they are still pushing it -
Yes. We can see the next phase of "we didn't know" being unveiled.
Dr McCullough has agreed & been recruited to be the spokesperson to beg for leniency for the criminals for the sake of saving science.
As of this morning, I am canceling paying for his Substack propaganda.
Yes, but good products are now lost in a sea of bureaucracy and lost trust - NIH/CDC/FDA...
The best way to re-boot the system, is repeal the 1986 Vaccine Act, and let the lawyers at Big Pharma, and their "executives". If we sent 2-3 Pharma Executives to jail, and took their money... the system would re-set.
God knows, I hate giving this opening to the lawyers, but believe it or not, we need their dirty tricks, WHICH DO NOT GO INTO ANYONES BODY, to counter Big Pharma's BIGGER dirty tricks. When Regan signed the 1986 Vaccine Act, he kind of knew this day was coming, and oh yea, The NY Times did REAL journalism:
"Mr. Reagan said he had approved the bill ''with mixed feelings'' because he had ''serious reservations'' about the vaccine compensation program." https://www.nytimes.com/1986/11/15/us/reagan-signs-bill-on-drug-exports-and-payment-for-vaccine-injuries.html
My other suggestions are at the end of my long citizen journal piece - https://outsidein51.substack.com/p/pro-vaccine-safety-in-2023-where
If Mr. Reagan really had serious reservations about the compensation program, then he was wrong to have signed it. He should have insisted protections be added to the bill, and they could have easily been included by a good lawyer. Yes, we do have good lawyers. Good lawyers who are also good men and women. I'll tell you what, after what our medical community has done, I will never put down "lawyers" again. They work long hours, and the ones who get settlements for people who have been injured deserve some of the money. They did the work. No one else pays them.
Thanks. My tone above was too snarky about lawyers, and I appreciate the constructive tone adjustment. 👍
I understand the general concept here - that 'one day' this sort of technology could be beneficial.
Accepting the spike protein is an issue, I don't think it's all about that.
In Australia not one mRNA product had been released for use in even a very select group at the time of these vaccines, though inventors had been working on it for decades. I imagine the inventors already knew that multiple injections of an LNP were far from feasible.
We can go along with blue sky thinking on future mRNA products, but not allow the promise to obscure the reality. The public is trained to think well of GM pesticide crops on the promise of beneficial inventions. For example, "Golden Rice" is a classic, pulled out of the drawer every couple of years to promote goodwill. But the beta carotene rapidly degrades unless the rice is stored in very cold fridges, and beta carotene is easier to find in green leaves on the roadside.
Here's another GMO "beneficial invention" that has been used to halo the GM pesticide crops... a product marketed on ABC science and children's shows as a "high omega 3" soy. Monsanto GM transfected the plants to produce two 'natural' proteins (desaturases), one from a primula and one from a fungus. These proteins randomly knocked around the developing soybeans, creating omega 3's out of omega 6's. Only thing is, the predominant omega 3 was SDA (steriodonic acid), an omega 3 not typically in our food, and one that could be harvested directly from toxic weeds growing in Australian paddocks if we truly wanted it. And while theses desaturases were knocking around they also increased the trans fat levels in the soybeans. These imperfections didn't stop the ABC science/kids shows marketing it as beneficial, just like fish oil. So the science buffs/kids can think the GM pesticide crops (99.99%) aren't great but there are very beneficial inventions.
And I can't help thinking that the "beneficial" mRNA inventions will be used for Exactly The Same purpose - as a cover for the continued rollout of dangerous mRNA vaxes.
NB: I don't think this soybean is in commercial production, for obvious reasons.
These products were designed to injure, maim and kill.
I would give these new platform products a small chance of utility in bespoke interventions where treatments & surgery have failed or considered inappropriate and where there’s information about the patients tumour.
That’s about it.
In public health? NEVER.
Autoimmune responses are built into the way the technology works.
It’s in the first couple of chapters of any immunology primer.
Best wishes
Mike
"These products were designed to injure, maim and kill." 100% - and nothing else. It is a eugenics program, run globally. Peace. :-)
I went to a friend’s funeral this past Saturday. He died very suddenly of a massive heart attack. He had developed A-fib since he had at least two Moderna shots in 2021. 66 yo. Although his father died from heart disease, I couldn’t help but wonder if he still died prematurely because nowadays there are more treatments for heart disease than 40 years ago when his own father had died. In fact he had an upcoming appt with a cardiologist but didn’t make it to.
I’m sorry for your loss.
Thank you Dr. Yeadon. I hope you are faring well through the madness! You know the Humanity thanks you and appreciates all your work & efforts towards bringing awareness and hopefully stopping the train.🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Yes I know two people. Husband and wife . Both got the double shot and she also received the booster. They both have a-fib now .
Big Pharma and a tyrannical US govt and their NGOs are the issue and the medical establishment as a whole needs to be totally rebuilt and the physician and the patient relationship restored and "informed consent" as a mandatory document, signed by the patient and entered into the medical record. I am pessimistic. Homeopathy and natural remedies are my preferred first line of treatment unless life threatening such as cancers, etc.
Even with cancers, do your research. For my cancer, I refused to do any chemo, radiation, or have certain areas cut out until we knew more. Hospitals around here considered cancer surgery ELECTIVE, so I researched surgeons and traveled to MD Anderson for my surgery. Even there, I had to prove my point with one of the surgeons, but I got what made sense, and it turns out I had been RIGHT. The other surgery did not need to be done. So, even when you are at an excellent medical center, sometimes you need to argue for what you know is correct. I had researched a long time. The GOOD thing was that my main cancer surgeon there ALLOWED me to argue with the other surgeon, and he sat by me as I did so.
Ralph Moss and his family have done excellent work highlighting the entire world of cancer since the 70s...when he refused to lie about a beloved researcher at Sloan-Kettering!
He wrote a book about that experience...
It’s interesting that cancer is mentioned as being an allopath go-to disease. That’s the one disease I wouldn’t trust the medical cartel with!! There are, and have been for decades cures for cancer by bright doctors who were censored and persecuted by the FDA. People suffering from diagnosed terminal ‘incurable’ pancreatic are still alive and are living another 20 years or more. To me, after experiencing the past four years, the allopath and their cohort in crime, the pharmacist is nothing but a legalised drug business model. Some do better than others. The last three years has demonstrated that conclusively.
WOW - my radar went off the charts when reading this.
Maybe time to move to another source.
My radar went off reading this
Just the shear fact that .GOV and Mugo pHARMA have wholly imbedded and embraced the stealth capture of each other for profiting/ pop controlling/ viral experimenting globally/ have Universities and labs doing Bio-defense and DOD .GOV funded technology never before seen, is quite enough for me to tap out. Figured out to say enough is ENOUGH! Where there is risk, there must be choice!
Having read The Real Anthony Fauci, as well as the writings of many excellent yet crucified health care providers throughout this entire Covid debacle, and now realizing the depth of corruption and deliberate malice in our entire medical system, I think I'm done with it.
I'd say a better approach, long before discussing the "possibilities" of future "beneficial" mRNA products, is to do thorough, unbiased studies of EVERY SINGLE VACCINE on the market, as well as EVERY SINGLE DRUG that has entered the marketplace in, say, the last 50 or 60 years. Let's find out exactly where we are with all these pharmaceuticals before we contemplate future pharmaceuticals. We're a nation full of people on multiple prescriptions for predominantly lifestyle-related diseases and disorders. We need to get real honest, and real accountable, across the board, and continuing to line the pockets of Big Harma is not the answer. Enough.
A very good idea. It needs doing, not that it’ll happen. If it doesn’t, no way should any withdrawn or suspended mRNA based product be permitted to be administered to the population.
I accept Peter’s remark that it might be possible to make an mRNA product encoding a missing human protein or to augment the amount of a human protein.
I just don’t get why this piece has been written at all.
There’s nothing in it to warn the unwary that these are NOT ordinary products made by pharma in the usual ways.
That takes many years and cannot much be truncated, no matter how urgent the need.
Peter is aware of Katherine Watt’s work on Substack, presumably, tracking the painstaking evolution of Federal “public health emergency” legislation?
This placed decision making into the hands of the US military and the HHS secretary, in whose sole discretion lay the decisions to order medical “countermeasures”, using contracting law which completely bypasses normal pharmaceutical R&D practices, including taking out of the loop of FDA, CDC etc. The companies were not required to demonstrate effectiveness or safety, only to demonstrate a large scale manufacturing prototype (if I’ve remembered the language correctly).
This underlies the alleged defence Pfizer is said to have used in the Brooke Jackson clinical trials malfeasance case. This defence is along the lines that “the client, which is the USG, is well aware of everything we did and accepted what we delivered to them despite the alleged infringements. They weren’t infringements because we delivered the fraud that USG ordered”.
I’m fairly sure that’s not verbatim but the gist of it is accurate.
Safety and efficacy shortfalls to one side, Hedley Rees’ decades in pharmaceutical manufacturing, quality & regulatory is outstanding and he was inadvertent at the centre of some early submissions in the early to mid 20-teens where he advised UK smallcos to secure substantial U.K. government grant funding in this field (of novel vaccine technology manufacturing). His deep knowledge and experience communicated clearly to us tells us the owners of these agents never established proper techniques required to have & demonstrate control of drug substance & after formulation, of drug product.
The implications are profound and Peter knows all this (or ought to know; I’d be happy to chat with him to summarise if helpful). It’s this: that whatever your views are about the safety and efficacy of the material used in the pivotal clinical trials, with all their fraudulent characteristics correctly experienced and documented by Brooke Jackson, the material dispensed into billions of glass vials cannot be the same material. Literally impossible. It takes years to even characterise adequately a multi step manufacturing process just like building a jet engine. Every time there was a scale up step, the entire process & all of the definitions, testing, acceptance criteria and associated limits has to be repeated, because otherwise you’re likely to produce something different.
Given the foregoing, back to Sasha Latypova & her Substack articles, on variable adverse effects rates. Just look at the very low AE rates with some lots and the extraordinarily high rates, including acute deaths, associated with a limited number of lots. There’s no way the manufacturers do not know this data. It’s routine that the pharmacovigilance function they have collates & analyses all such AE/SAE reports.
I recall Peter correctly stating that, if you treated this like any other new product, in the case of the Pfizer injection, first commercial rollout was Dec 2020 & yet by end Jan 2021, we had sufficient evidence of poor safety to withdraw the products entirely from the market.
Peter correctly lists a bunch of built in safety risks. Does he not appreciate that people just like me had responsibility for the initially experimental “vaccines”? I was head of global research for treatments for respiratory and allergic diseases, a Vice President position. My peers hold analogous roles in biologicals of vaccines R&D. I personally know 3 of the 4 VPs (generally Senior or Executive VP roles, given the commercial importance of vaccines as a category for these companies).
Here’s the thing. They know what I know & vice versa. We shared a common training by virtue of being in the same university system around the same time and would have had common foundational training, very likely owning the same set texts in immunology, biochemistry, microbiology & the like. Then each had decades of commercial experience in research and exploratory development (including toxicology testing, First-In-Humans (FIH) and clinical proofs of concept.
Their experience of so-called “rational drug design” meant that, as the products were being designed, before anything was even made for the first time, they’d see the same, really obvious safety concerns. They’re none of them stupid people. Two refused to speak to me. One disregarded my email (or never read it). One of the two engaged in quite a back and forth, feigning ignorance of what I was talking about, before going in to resign without giving a reason. That person was Dr Mathai Mammen of Jansen within JNJ. No one walks from SVP roles without a very good reason, because they leave many millions of $ on the table in deferred compensation.
I expect Peter knows all of this and more. Though short & mostly critical about these products, he leaves open the door to “improved” versions. I’m sorry, but respectfully, this is a serious mistake. Why do I say that? We’ve been told that mRNA VACCINE manufacturing plants are being built on every continent. Governments in numerous countries have announced that they’ve agreed business terms to acquire sufficient of future “vaccines” on this mRNA technology to inject each citizen, woman, TEN MORE TIMES!!
I wonder how they plan to coerce or mandate these injurious compounds?
So, please be unequivocal. We’re living in an active crime scene. Not the time to start reviewing the government’s depleted uranium projectiles.
Thank you Dr. Yeadon. All this is confusing bc I thought Dr. McCullough was aware and against them. Wondering if they got to him somehow? Jabbing each human 10x is tantamount to sheer torture of humans beyond anything I ever could have imagined.
As a vaccine injured person, I would prefer all efforts going forward were to finding ways to mitigate the damage done to me and so many others. They have taken my healthy life away from me but I would prefer to have that back than have them in jail. I believe many injured, maimed and dead would agree.
You should have both: your health back AND the perpetrators in jail