Our government at the time of the Nuremberg Trials brought 1800 German scientists to the U.S., many who had been Nazis. I wondered, if they were responsible for the vaccines that started to be promoted with Well Baby visits in the 1950s. The Nazis were not happy to have suffered defeat...and I wonder, if they wanted to get even; and destroy America.
Politicians should be selected randomly (lottery)among the adult population with some sélection criteria to avoid manifest casting errors if we want a genuine democracy. Politics should not be a profession per se but a public service with mandates Renewed only once. This is a system Étienne Chouard has been working on in France for many years. It is the only system that prevents a concentration of people looking for power and self enrichment rather than for the common good.
I presume the US is a bit like Australia. We have two entwined power sharing factions similar to the red and blue. My concern is how these "parties" determine who will be nominated for a seat. I do not view the current system as democratic and many of them will represent the party or themselves but not the people. The millions of dollars raised for election campaigns also prevents the likelihood of the common folk from having a chance. Dem/Republican are two cheeks on the same arse. Donations to senators from corporations and influential individuals seeking favours may also be an area that needs to be closely examined to avoid negative influences. One example of this is senators Warren and Sanders who have received substantial sums of money from big pHarma.
Israeli commanders correctly view the people of Gaza as Nazis, who want to genocide the Jewish people. They are not innocent: they chose Hamas, loved, and supported it for twenty years.
The Nuremberg trials could not have tried every Nazi guilty of sickening crines in Germany. There were too many of them. They were symbolic of the revulsion that Civilization felt for Nazism. So, too, it would be impossible to judge and punish every Gazan (and Palestinian) guilty of crimes. But they must be relocated, just as ethnic Germans were relocated from their killing fields in eastern Eutope.
Netanyahu chose to elevate Hamas, in order to keep a division between the West Bank and Gaza and avoid the establishment of a Palestinian state. Smotrich, a Zionist said this in 2015. The Zionists overplayed their hand.
There can be no Palestinian state next to Israel. It would exist only to destroy Israel. If Palestinians had wanted a state, they could have accepted the excellent terms they were offered for a state on eight occasions.
It is a ridiculous gambit. Hala has been relocating large numbers of Gazans, and is paid $5,000 a head. So far relocating a reported hundreds of thousands to Canada : (, Indonesia, and Malaysia. Reportedly, Israel has offered Jordan contiguous coastal land if Jordan will let Palestinians live there (which would unfortinately be next to Israel). Libya, Turkey, Qatar, and several east African countries have at different times expressed willingness to take them. How about Ireland or the French Riviera?
Due to their vicious crimes and anti-Semitism for over a century, it is foolish or criminal to suggest that they remain in Gaza, Judea, or Samaria.
Amnesty International Report 2003 differs on that. Currently there are half a million illegal settlers living in the West bank, not subjected to the hundreds of movement restrictions imposed on Palestinians. The Oslo framework was not excellent, dig deeper.
The Jewish settlers have a right to be there, while the Arabs do not. Originally God, but later many international agreements, gave that land to the Jews, giving the much larger territory which became known as Jordan, to the Arabs. That being said, King Hussein had thousands shot and thousands more kicked out when they tried to kill him and take over his government in 1970. Kuwait did the same in the late ‘80s.
Palestinians are subject to movement restrictions because they are constantly murdering Jews, as Islam demands.
If everything came from the mind of humans, then there would be nothing to prevent anyone from doing whatever he felt like doing. As we are seeing now. The reason for which large numbers are returning to religion.
I see Gazans as brainwashed puppets of fundamentalist leaders such as Emirati of Qatar. He feeds them propaganda until they are in a frenzy to continue the war they lost in 1948. Except the fundamentalist are not concerned about a Palestinian state, their vision is extermination of Jews, all infidel, and a new caliphate.
What about people like Gauci and Gates who went to poor countries and basically massacred and sterilized populations throughout African and Asia, killing mostly children and sterilizing women with full knowledge of their actions under a pretense of “science” and “vaccines” which if they actually were effective would be too expensive for those people who served as their guinea pigs. And how about the mass graves in New York filled with orphans who couldn’t consent. How hasn’t either of those monsters faced charges of crimes against humanity? I’m really curious how they walk free with so many dead in their wake.
You argue, "In each case, politicians and military officers thought, “This time it’s different, because we really are civilized, and our dreadful opponents really are animals.”" I don't think so.
First, we have to acknowledge those calculations "in each case" never occurred as what we came to call the crimes at Nuremberg did not exist then. Samantha Powers describes the problem in her great work, The Problem from Hell.
The problem presented on Oct 7 is it was no different from old pogroms or the Shoah, and, instead, it was a repetition of Jew hatred by forces who have even less regard for human rights than your Roman generals or US Cavalry officers did.
So I ask again, how do you propose to eliminate the Jew hatred that has infected those who live in Gaza and perpetrated the Oct 7 massacre? Hatred Hamas is now turning on its own before they will again turn it on the Jews as surely as night follows day.
Thank you. It is not nearly so simple, and if it was me, I'd choose a much higher number in the effort to atone for the massacre of my people, which they are not BTW. Say 500 or 1000 to one for example. Judging from our bench Israel's response to Oct 7 in the context of 2,000 years of Jew hate is a fool's errand.
I respect and admire your scholarship, which is why I subscribe, and why I will renew again my question, which remains unanswered: how do you propose to eliminate the Jew hatred that has infected those who live in Gaza (including thousands of children who are taught to hate in UN sponsored schools) and perpetrated the Oct 7 massacre?
Greetings Mike, I have no proposal for eliminating hatred from the heart of any man, especially when I have no idea of what he is going through. I work very hard to keep it from entering my own heart and I strive to be fair and impartial in my investigation of all human affairs. Reprisal killings were found by the Nuremberg trial of US v. List et al. to be a war crime. I doubt that it would be prudent for people, least of all the Jewish people, to overturn this legal finding. Best regards, John
Hello again John, Sorry to drive the point home. When I graduated from Naval Justice School, the CO gave us advice on what he expected of his lawyers. He said, don’t tell me what I cannot do. Tell me how to legally do what I want to do.
So, what can be done to stop the Jew haters whose founding charter calls for the extermination of all Jews?
Declaring a cease fire and trading 20 living hostages for 2000 Hamas warriors held in prison and another 250 Hamas criminals convicted of murder is no sure path to peace. The opposite is true and is borne out every day. Rome rid the world of its Carthage problem in the Third Punic War by razing the city and killing or enslaving its inhabitants.
In my view, a law made in 1945 by the victors in that war does not appear suitable for the problem Israel faces in Gaza.
Haliva did not endorse the deliberate killing of chikdren. Gaza brought the war upon itself, meaning that Israel had to kill the enemy until it was defeated. Israel achieved the lowest ratio of militant to non-militant deaths of any army in all of history, constantly sending warnings of impending attacks by the IDF, with maps and camps for non-combatants. No army has ever gone to such lengths to protect enemy non-combatants. Who did not deserve it.
Hamas was embedded in the non-combatant population, hiding among them, placing its weapons and control centers in and under hospitals, clinics, schools. It put hostages in the homes and apartments of non-combatants, who were happy to starve and torture them. Therr eas not a single decent Gazan who tried to help them.
In every war, large numbers of civilians die (therr are no civilians in Gaza). It cannot be avoided, although Israel did so better than any other army. Halavi only stated the obvious. In every war, children will die. But when a war is necessary and just, as WWII and the Gaza War were (are), then you have to fight to win. Israel has never deliberately targeted and killed a child. But if the child is located at a valid military target, then if he is killed it is unavoidable collateral damage, and those who invoked the war by shooting, immolating, torturing, raping, and beheading, and kidnapping thousands of innocents, bear the moral responsibility for all the deaths on both sides. And this is obvious.
A historical example — the Roman suppression of the Jewish revolt was no different than the destruction the Romans visited on the Carthaginians, the Gauls, the Druids or any others. Nor did the Germanic invaders of the Western Empire or the Huns behave any differently when they destroyed the Western Empire.
Maybe, though I doubt that many rabbinic scholars would agree with your assessment. I think they tend to regard it as an especially painful event because it drove them away from their Holy Land. And to be sure, I wouldn't defend the way the Romans treated any of their conquered subjects in many of their campaigns.
As I noted, it was simply the way it was in those times.
Another example, the early Muslims under Mohammed first moved into an area (Yathrib, now Medina) that had many Jewish residents, then they made war on the Jews and drove them out of Yathrib and finally pursed them to their new home (Khaybar) an annihilated them by killing the men and taking the women as slaves.
Much or your sentiments rely on a particularly pacifistic and sanitized view of history.
The so-called ' Nuremberg Trials' were nothing more than THEATRE; aka Show Trials!
If AmeriKans knew Real History, instead of the BULLSHIT that they were INDOCTRINATED with, in government SKOOLS (spelled on purpose), then they would know this to be a FACT.
Largely true. The defenders of the Nuremberg Trials saw what was happening to the credibility of their trials, the accountability that evaporated once the cameras and ink devoted to them disappeared. They said they had to stop beyond the theater because the "new threat" of an expansionist Soviet Union needed to be stopped. And that the US needed Germans as allies, aggressive prosecution and punishment would alienate the Germans, drive them into the Soviet sphere of influence. Rightly or wrongly that was acknowledged as the rationale, and the theater was useful to deter, even if the punishments themselves weren't. This movie from 1961 even admitted that reality, which you correctly point out. Providing their justification for the theater towards the end of the movie, as the verdict was being debated and reached.
Judgement at Nuremberg (1961)
Spencer Tracey, Burt Lancaster, Judy Garland, William Shatner, Werner Klemperer
Canada participated in a show trial and execution of German soldiers accused of the massacre of Polish soldiers (Katyryn massacre). Soviet Union killed a second set for the same reason. Soviet Union Gorbachev apologized and admitted they did it. Canada has yet to apologize.
The Gazan’s who are raised to hate and destroy Jews, danced in the streets after October 7th. While they are not animals per se they are evil. Evil is Live spelled backwards - while they are suffering they brought it on themselves. Only a fool who doesn’t understand that all of us are one can brutally murder his brother and expert no consequence. There is a time for war and a time for peace. Hamas/Palestinians instigated a time for war. Israel waged the war while feeding its enemy. Only the blind or evil ones can not understand.
I worked at a hospital in Australia where nice young Muslim staff were observed dancing for joy when 911 occurred. These were charming men who would wish me 'Merry Christmas'. Their behavior as far as I know was always impeccable. But after this and some other incidents I was never to sure what might happen if they were in power. Incidentally, we all know that everywhere, even here in Australia, there are mosques and Islamic schools teaching hatred of Jews. I do not imagine there are any synagogues in which young Jewish boys and girls are taught to hate anyone.
As some have said we just keep repeating history and we will continue to do so as long as the present world exists. So many of us want righteousness done. We have a built in moral code, I would argue it is the 10 commandments out of Exodus 20 and Deuteronomy 5. However we all break those commandments ourselves.
Is it your premise, or am I mistaken , that Haliva actually killed 50 of his enemies for every loss Israel suffered, and killed children as well? Or was he just spouting off in rage, from a position of responsiblity and power in the Israeli intelligence service where he obviously didn't measure up, and should have been removed?
Because if he is guilty of foul and unseemly thought and speech, rather than an act of savagery, It seems a bit overwrought to be harking to Nuremberg trials and such. Those defendants had been guilty of well-documented mass killings. Halivi's 'action' is more like the idiot democrat candidate for AG of Virginia- inappropriate and wrong. Does the VA candidate for AG bring visions of Nuremberg to you as well?
Sometimes the premise that you begin with is so flawed that it makes the remainder of whatever proposition you are promoting unworthy. For example, a year or so ago you (and Peter McCullough as well)came up with the notion that there really was no illegal immigration problem in the entire USA because neither of you noticed alot of unfamiliar faces in your neighborhoods, or in airports , when you were traveling. To date, even with tens of thousands of criminal aliens having been arrested, numerous killings of innocents by them documented, and rather obvious riots and attacks on federal enforcement agents in your own city as well as Chicago, and elsewhere, you have yet to admit that perhaps you had a problem with your premises and logic then.
Thus, I submit that your whole thesis and 'metaphor' of the Nuremberg Trials in your last two posts is bullshit.
I was shocked to hear that a senior military commander in Israel advocated 50 to 1 reprisal killings, given that reprisal killings were found to be war crimes and crimes against humanity at the Nuremberg Trial of General List et al. I would be equally shocked, and I would express my shock, if a US military commander advocated reprisal killings in a US war zone. Many thanks for reading! Best regards, John
Im still waiting for you to defend the idea that mass immigration from mexico and central america is not an invasion, is not real. Do you also think Antifa is just an "idea"?
I never said illegal immigration wasn't real; I know illegal immigrants. My question was WHERE the millions of illegals are hanging out in the US? In Austria the recent immigrants from the Middle East are everywhere and impossible not to see -- literally on most street corners in Vienna. Where are the millions of recent illegals hanging out in a country such as ours that has little to no surplus housing? Just a question-- part of my habit of questioning ALL representations of reality that I am not seeing firsthand.
Then you don’t get out much. They are in every school, every construction site, in every Walmart and Costco, in thousands of big rigs driving down the freeways. I’m astonished you’re even able to live daily life without seeing a hundred illegal aliens a day. You must be very sheltered. My husband traveled this country in an RV for ten years and we could actually watch the invasion, that started in the 70s and 80s progress through the country from Texas, AZ and California into Colorado, OK, and north into Oregon and WA then throughout the south. Millions of low paying jobs taken over by an invading horde that has no allegiance to the United States and no desire to learn her language or adapt to her customs and traditions.
I’ve read your Focal Points with much interest and amusement but to say you can’t see your country being taken over by scavenging hordes makes me doubt your sanity.
We recently made our first trip to the U.K., and were appalled to see what London has become. One can scarcely find an Englishman there and it is becoming a little version of the worst of the Middle East. This has to stop before we lose our culture completely.
Our government at the time of the Nuremberg Trials brought 1800 German scientists to the U.S., many who had been Nazis. I wondered, if they were responsible for the vaccines that started to be promoted with Well Baby visits in the 1950s. The Nazis were not happy to have suffered defeat...and I wonder, if they wanted to get even; and destroy America.
Politicians should be selected randomly (lottery)among the adult population with some sélection criteria to avoid manifest casting errors if we want a genuine democracy. Politics should not be a profession per se but a public service with mandates Renewed only once. This is a system Étienne Chouard has been working on in France for many years. It is the only system that prevents a concentration of people looking for power and self enrichment rather than for the common good.
I presume the US is a bit like Australia. We have two entwined power sharing factions similar to the red and blue. My concern is how these "parties" determine who will be nominated for a seat. I do not view the current system as democratic and many of them will represent the party or themselves but not the people. The millions of dollars raised for election campaigns also prevents the likelihood of the common folk from having a chance. Dem/Republican are two cheeks on the same arse. Donations to senators from corporations and influential individuals seeking favours may also be an area that needs to be closely examined to avoid negative influences. One example of this is senators Warren and Sanders who have received substantial sums of money from big pHarma.
Yes, I’ve been advocating for political office being much like jury duty.
Now there's a good idea. We'd get some real loons. Still better than what we're getting now, by a lot.
Some of the rules from Nuremberg were abandoned 5 years ago. And it looks as though they will never be reintroduced.
So we should all look forward to being lab animals for government approved testing. 🙄
I'll deprive them of my sample if I have to!🤓
With the shit they're developing, you won't have that option.
Israeli commanders correctly view the people of Gaza as Nazis, who want to genocide the Jewish people. They are not innocent: they chose Hamas, loved, and supported it for twenty years.
The Nuremberg trials could not have tried every Nazi guilty of sickening crines in Germany. There were too many of them. They were symbolic of the revulsion that Civilization felt for Nazism. So, too, it would be impossible to judge and punish every Gazan (and Palestinian) guilty of crimes. But they must be relocated, just as ethnic Germans were relocated from their killing fields in eastern Eutope.
Netanyahu chose to elevate Hamas, in order to keep a division between the West Bank and Gaza and avoid the establishment of a Palestinian state. Smotrich, a Zionist said this in 2015. The Zionists overplayed their hand.
⬆️🚨WHORE🚨⬆️
There can be no Palestinian state next to Israel. It would exist only to destroy Israel. If Palestinians had wanted a state, they could have accepted the excellent terms they were offered for a state on eight occasions.
It is a ridiculous gambit. Hala has been relocating large numbers of Gazans, and is paid $5,000 a head. So far relocating a reported hundreds of thousands to Canada : (, Indonesia, and Malaysia. Reportedly, Israel has offered Jordan contiguous coastal land if Jordan will let Palestinians live there (which would unfortinately be next to Israel). Libya, Turkey, Qatar, and several east African countries have at different times expressed willingness to take them. How about Ireland or the French Riviera?
Due to their vicious crimes and anti-Semitism for over a century, it is foolish or criminal to suggest that they remain in Gaza, Judea, or Samaria.
Amnesty International Report 2003 differs on that. Currently there are half a million illegal settlers living in the West bank, not subjected to the hundreds of movement restrictions imposed on Palestinians. The Oslo framework was not excellent, dig deeper.
The Jewish settlers have a right to be there, while the Arabs do not. Originally God, but later many international agreements, gave that land to the Jews, giving the much larger territory which became known as Jordan, to the Arabs. That being said, King Hussein had thousands shot and thousands more kicked out when they tried to kill him and take over his government in 1970. Kuwait did the same in the late ‘80s.
Palestinians are subject to movement restrictions because they are constantly murdering Jews, as Islam demands.
You lost me at God giving the land to the Jews. This all comes from the mind of humans. Ideologies cause so much conflict.
God is real, and much comes from thr mind of God.
If everything came from the mind of humans, then there would be nothing to prevent anyone from doing whatever he felt like doing. As we are seeing now. The reason for which large numbers are returning to religion.
Yes, sometimes the defeated really ARE the bad guys. The Palestinians chose their bed and now they have to lay in it.
I see Gazans as brainwashed puppets of fundamentalist leaders such as Emirati of Qatar. He feeds them propaganda until they are in a frenzy to continue the war they lost in 1948. Except the fundamentalist are not concerned about a Palestinian state, their vision is extermination of Jews, all infidel, and a new caliphate.
What about people like Gauci and Gates who went to poor countries and basically massacred and sterilized populations throughout African and Asia, killing mostly children and sterilizing women with full knowledge of their actions under a pretense of “science” and “vaccines” which if they actually were effective would be too expensive for those people who served as their guinea pigs. And how about the mass graves in New York filled with orphans who couldn’t consent. How hasn’t either of those monsters faced charges of crimes against humanity? I’m really curious how they walk free with so many dead in their wake.
Anyone that holds my brother’s and sister’s hostage are worthy to be called animals. When they repent they can be forgiven.
Bullshit
We are all being held hostage...say no to Fear-anny!😎
You argue, "In each case, politicians and military officers thought, “This time it’s different, because we really are civilized, and our dreadful opponents really are animals.”" I don't think so.
First, we have to acknowledge those calculations "in each case" never occurred as what we came to call the crimes at Nuremberg did not exist then. Samantha Powers describes the problem in her great work, The Problem from Hell.
The problem presented on Oct 7 is it was no different from old pogroms or the Shoah, and, instead, it was a repetition of Jew hatred by forces who have even less regard for human rights than your Roman generals or US Cavalry officers did.
So I ask again, how do you propose to eliminate the Jew hatred that has infected those who live in Gaza and perpetrated the Oct 7 massacre? Hatred Hamas is now turning on its own before they will again turn it on the Jews as surely as night follows day.
Just to be clear: Does this mean that you agree with Haliva's endorsement of 50 to 1 reprisal killings, including children? Regards, John
Thank you. It is not nearly so simple, and if it was me, I'd choose a much higher number in the effort to atone for the massacre of my people, which they are not BTW. Say 500 or 1000 to one for example. Judging from our bench Israel's response to Oct 7 in the context of 2,000 years of Jew hate is a fool's errand.
I respect and admire your scholarship, which is why I subscribe, and why I will renew again my question, which remains unanswered: how do you propose to eliminate the Jew hatred that has infected those who live in Gaza (including thousands of children who are taught to hate in UN sponsored schools) and perpetrated the Oct 7 massacre?
Cheers, Mike
Greetings Mike, I have no proposal for eliminating hatred from the heart of any man, especially when I have no idea of what he is going through. I work very hard to keep it from entering my own heart and I strive to be fair and impartial in my investigation of all human affairs. Reprisal killings were found by the Nuremberg trial of US v. List et al. to be a war crime. I doubt that it would be prudent for people, least of all the Jewish people, to overturn this legal finding. Best regards, John
Hello again John, Sorry to drive the point home. When I graduated from Naval Justice School, the CO gave us advice on what he expected of his lawyers. He said, don’t tell me what I cannot do. Tell me how to legally do what I want to do.
So, what can be done to stop the Jew haters whose founding charter calls for the extermination of all Jews?
Declaring a cease fire and trading 20 living hostages for 2000 Hamas warriors held in prison and another 250 Hamas criminals convicted of murder is no sure path to peace. The opposite is true and is borne out every day. Rome rid the world of its Carthage problem in the Third Punic War by razing the city and killing or enslaving its inhabitants.
In my view, a law made in 1945 by the victors in that war does not appear suitable for the problem Israel faces in Gaza.
I don't think an 'eye for an eye' works to eliminate hate.
Haliva did not endorse the deliberate killing of chikdren. Gaza brought the war upon itself, meaning that Israel had to kill the enemy until it was defeated. Israel achieved the lowest ratio of militant to non-militant deaths of any army in all of history, constantly sending warnings of impending attacks by the IDF, with maps and camps for non-combatants. No army has ever gone to such lengths to protect enemy non-combatants. Who did not deserve it.
Hamas was embedded in the non-combatant population, hiding among them, placing its weapons and control centers in and under hospitals, clinics, schools. It put hostages in the homes and apartments of non-combatants, who were happy to starve and torture them. Therr eas not a single decent Gazan who tried to help them.
In every war, large numbers of civilians die (therr are no civilians in Gaza). It cannot be avoided, although Israel did so better than any other army. Halavi only stated the obvious. In every war, children will die. But when a war is necessary and just, as WWII and the Gaza War were (are), then you have to fight to win. Israel has never deliberately targeted and killed a child. But if the child is located at a valid military target, then if he is killed it is unavoidable collateral damage, and those who invoked the war by shooting, immolating, torturing, raping, and beheading, and kidnapping thousands of innocents, bear the moral responsibility for all the deaths on both sides. And this is obvious.
A historical example — the Roman suppression of the Jewish revolt was no different than the destruction the Romans visited on the Carthaginians, the Gauls, the Druids or any others. Nor did the Germanic invaders of the Western Empire or the Huns behave any differently when they destroyed the Western Empire.
Maybe, though I doubt that many rabbinic scholars would agree with your assessment. I think they tend to regard it as an especially painful event because it drove them away from their Holy Land. And to be sure, I wouldn't defend the way the Romans treated any of their conquered subjects in many of their campaigns.
As I noted, it was simply the way it was in those times.
Another example, the early Muslims under Mohammed first moved into an area (Yathrib, now Medina) that had many Jewish residents, then they made war on the Jews and drove them out of Yathrib and finally pursed them to their new home (Khaybar) an annihilated them by killing the men and taking the women as slaves.
Much or your sentiments rely on a particularly pacifistic and sanitized view of history.
I was just fired by my dentist for declining x-rays🙄
The dentists always tell me, the newer ones are safe, we get more radiation from the sun. I don't know.
OMG…that’s exactly what she said.
And your response should be , “ Thanks for letting me know the x rays are dangerous. While I can’t avoid sunlight, I can avoid your x rays.”
Yep!
REAL History.......
The so-called ' Nuremberg Trials' were nothing more than THEATRE; aka Show Trials!
If AmeriKans knew Real History, instead of the BULLSHIT that they were INDOCTRINATED with, in government SKOOLS (spelled on purpose), then they would know this to be a FACT.
Largely true. The defenders of the Nuremberg Trials saw what was happening to the credibility of their trials, the accountability that evaporated once the cameras and ink devoted to them disappeared. They said they had to stop beyond the theater because the "new threat" of an expansionist Soviet Union needed to be stopped. And that the US needed Germans as allies, aggressive prosecution and punishment would alienate the Germans, drive them into the Soviet sphere of influence. Rightly or wrongly that was acknowledged as the rationale, and the theater was useful to deter, even if the punishments themselves weren't. This movie from 1961 even admitted that reality, which you correctly point out. Providing their justification for the theater towards the end of the movie, as the verdict was being debated and reached.
Judgement at Nuremberg (1961)
Spencer Tracey, Burt Lancaster, Judy Garland, William Shatner, Werner Klemperer
https://archive.org/details/movie-judgment-at-nuremberg-1961
Based on the Judges Trial in the Subsequent Trials at Nuremberg.
Canada participated in a show trial and execution of German soldiers accused of the massacre of Polish soldiers (Katyryn massacre). Soviet Union killed a second set for the same reason. Soviet Union Gorbachev apologized and admitted they did it. Canada has yet to apologize.
The Gazan’s who are raised to hate and destroy Jews, danced in the streets after October 7th. While they are not animals per se they are evil. Evil is Live spelled backwards - while they are suffering they brought it on themselves. Only a fool who doesn’t understand that all of us are one can brutally murder his brother and expert no consequence. There is a time for war and a time for peace. Hamas/Palestinians instigated a time for war. Israel waged the war while feeding its enemy. Only the blind or evil ones can not understand.
I worked at a hospital in Australia where nice young Muslim staff were observed dancing for joy when 911 occurred. These were charming men who would wish me 'Merry Christmas'. Their behavior as far as I know was always impeccable. But after this and some other incidents I was never to sure what might happen if they were in power. Incidentally, we all know that everywhere, even here in Australia, there are mosques and Islamic schools teaching hatred of Jews. I do not imagine there are any synagogues in which young Jewish boys and girls are taught to hate anyone.
Meanwhile, in Canada. "The state invariably attracts hyper energetic and aggressive gangsters"
CFIA ostrich farm overreach accelerates as neighbour's property seized, threatened with arrest
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ss3VrNhTCI8
As some have said we just keep repeating history and we will continue to do so as long as the present world exists. So many of us want righteousness done. We have a built in moral code, I would argue it is the 10 commandments out of Exodus 20 and Deuteronomy 5. However we all break those commandments ourselves.
Hope we get Nuremberg 2.0 and sentence ALL to death who pushed the jab…that cleans up the pigs 🤬
Put that pig Oprah in jail
Hang em high
Mr Leake:
Is it your premise, or am I mistaken , that Haliva actually killed 50 of his enemies for every loss Israel suffered, and killed children as well? Or was he just spouting off in rage, from a position of responsiblity and power in the Israeli intelligence service where he obviously didn't measure up, and should have been removed?
Because if he is guilty of foul and unseemly thought and speech, rather than an act of savagery, It seems a bit overwrought to be harking to Nuremberg trials and such. Those defendants had been guilty of well-documented mass killings. Halivi's 'action' is more like the idiot democrat candidate for AG of Virginia- inappropriate and wrong. Does the VA candidate for AG bring visions of Nuremberg to you as well?
Sometimes the premise that you begin with is so flawed that it makes the remainder of whatever proposition you are promoting unworthy. For example, a year or so ago you (and Peter McCullough as well)came up with the notion that there really was no illegal immigration problem in the entire USA because neither of you noticed alot of unfamiliar faces in your neighborhoods, or in airports , when you were traveling. To date, even with tens of thousands of criminal aliens having been arrested, numerous killings of innocents by them documented, and rather obvious riots and attacks on federal enforcement agents in your own city as well as Chicago, and elsewhere, you have yet to admit that perhaps you had a problem with your premises and logic then.
Thus, I submit that your whole thesis and 'metaphor' of the Nuremberg Trials in your last two posts is bullshit.
I was shocked to hear that a senior military commander in Israel advocated 50 to 1 reprisal killings, given that reprisal killings were found to be war crimes and crimes against humanity at the Nuremberg Trial of General List et al. I would be equally shocked, and I would express my shock, if a US military commander advocated reprisal killings in a US war zone. Many thanks for reading! Best regards, John
Im still waiting for you to defend the idea that mass immigration from mexico and central america is not an invasion, is not real. Do you also think Antifa is just an "idea"?
You might find this instructive: https://tomklingenstein.com/inside-the-illegal-immigration-machine/
I never said illegal immigration wasn't real; I know illegal immigrants. My question was WHERE the millions of illegals are hanging out in the US? In Austria the recent immigrants from the Middle East are everywhere and impossible not to see -- literally on most street corners in Vienna. Where are the millions of recent illegals hanging out in a country such as ours that has little to no surplus housing? Just a question-- part of my habit of questioning ALL representations of reality that I am not seeing firsthand.
Then you don’t get out much. They are in every school, every construction site, in every Walmart and Costco, in thousands of big rigs driving down the freeways. I’m astonished you’re even able to live daily life without seeing a hundred illegal aliens a day. You must be very sheltered. My husband traveled this country in an RV for ten years and we could actually watch the invasion, that started in the 70s and 80s progress through the country from Texas, AZ and California into Colorado, OK, and north into Oregon and WA then throughout the south. Millions of low paying jobs taken over by an invading horde that has no allegiance to the United States and no desire to learn her language or adapt to her customs and traditions.
I’ve read your Focal Points with much interest and amusement but to say you can’t see your country being taken over by scavenging hordes makes me doubt your sanity.
We recently made our first trip to the U.K., and were appalled to see what London has become. One can scarcely find an Englishman there and it is becoming a little version of the worst of the Middle East. This has to stop before we lose our culture completely.