All the independent experts have analyzed the evidence and found the motive: stop Kirk from anti-Zionist speech, and the assassins: Netanyahu and his Mossad thugs.
Courageous voices like Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, Michael Yon, ThePeoplesvoice.tv, rense.com, and more have shown us the mainstream media and US Govt is complicit and/or blackmailed to lie to the public. This is Kennedy assassination 102 and Epstein cover-up 103.
Sure, but Jones was wanting to stick with the establishment, more "comfortable" transtifa theory, so it's good to see him giving it up.
P.S. I should have mentioned that one of the reasons Jones gave for giving up on Robinson as the shooter is the obvious coverup, with some reports, including Jones', suggesting the judge may try to gag as many as 3,000 witnesses, including event attendees and people who had interviewed Kirk.
I'm just more surprised that A.Jones would just now be relinquishing his position of support for the Tyler theory. As deeply as AJ goes into researching the establishment, you would think that his critical thinking skills warning bells would immediately clang as soon as he heard them exclaim: "We got 'im!" Unless you see the dude walk up to Charlie, point the gun in his face and pull the trigger, you don't "got 'im." in the space of 33 hours...interesting number. Careful investigation, collects ballistic evidence that may be left at the scene, collects surveillance footage, tapes off the crime scene, interviews many witnesses, including the university staff, performs an autopsy, et cetera! ...before making any DEFINITIVE statement. Maybe ask questions like, why were there no first responders and police there? Why no ambulance standibg by for precaution as was supposed to be, due to the number of attendees? That's just a few of the red flags that come to my mind, nobody, and A.Jones, with his MO and investigative mindset just accepted the official narrative as valid until now? Makes me question him and anyone who would be that willingly blind.
For those 3,000 witnesses, WE THE PEOPLE are behind You. Please don't let anyone stop You from being a Truth Teller. God loves the Truth Tellers, and WE THE PEOPLE are not getting the Truth.
Do “all the independent experts” have access to all the evidence? How did they get it? Did the FBI turn it over to them? Sorry, but Candace wasn’t even invited to the memorial service, but claims to have all this inside knowledge? Haven’t seen any of the “receipts” she keeps talking about. Sorry, but I’m very skeptical that your claims have been substantiated.
Invited? Anyone could have gone. That is a silly thing to say.
She and Charlie were still friends. They were in touch. You should see the texts.
She is asking absolutely important questions. She and others are investigating because the narrative does not add up.
If you are not questioning this investigation, my only suggestion is you might need to go get a booster. The government said they're safe and effective.
Being skeptical is fine, when evidence is inconsistent with other sources or does not make sense. What specific investigative journalists do you trust in the Kirk assassination?
A miracle?!?!?! Bullshit! A 30-06 bullet hitting Charlie Kirk in the neck would have literally blown his head off. It is not a "miracle" it is a fucking lie being told by Kash Patel and the Trump regime. These crooks are just as disingenuous as the Biden crime family. I am righteously pissed off because I voted for these motherfuckers.
I am totally fed up with Trump's ultra-Zionism and his promoting the genocide of the Palestinians in Gaza. I relinquish my support of these fucking ghouls.
Absofugginlutely I feel the same. Utter & complete bullshit the story they’re tryin 2 tell. A 30-06 round at that distance would’ve taken his head completely off & would’ve kept going until it struck a solid object. Not a single fuckin chance in hell his neck stopped that size of round at that close of a distance. They’re all bullshitting & gaslighting everyone except the internet is forever & there’s way 2 many people digging deep & their story is rapidly falling apart.
We notice that the unnamed surgeon didn't state the caliber of the bullet. But oddly, we know the names of the surgeons at Timpanogos Regional Hospital because IP addresses in DC and Israel were searching on the hospital, its surgeons, and even Tyler Robinson during a two-week period back in July (https://www.youtube.com/@realbaronpodcast). It's like someone could envision the future.
Former Green Beret and citizen journalist Nate Cornacchia breaks down three major anomalies that 100% throw the official Charlie Kirk assassination narrative into question.
Is Charlie Kirks shooting just theater?
Investigators ask, why is there no visible blood at the scene of Charlie Kirk's assassination?
1. There should have been blood everywhere, no one tried to stop the bleeding. Their hands had zero blood on them. No one tried to save his life?
Carotid arteries are blood vessels supplying blood to the brain, face, and neck, sending oxygen-rich blood to the brain and other parts of the head and neck.
The coronary arteries wrap around the entire heart. The two main branches are the left coronary artery and right coronary artery.
"Apply direct, firm pressure to the wound using a sterile bandage or clean cloth. Use the heel of your hand to press down as hard as you can. Do not lift the cloth to check the wound; if blood soaks through, add more gauze or cloth on top and continue pressing."
“Yes, a person can bleed when they have been shot and killed. The extent of bleeding depends on the severity of the injury, the type of bullet, and the location of the shot. In cases of severe arterial wounds, a person could bleed out in as little as three minutes if the bullet hits an artery. Prompt medical attention is crucial to manage bleeding and prevent further complications.”
Those are the questions that need answers. Where was all the blood that should’ve sprayed everywhere & everything. Zero blood on any of the people around Charlie & none of them actively trying to stop the bleeding nor where any chest compressions being attempted. They were just handing things off 2 other people. Where is all the footage as you indicated… where’s the footage from the tpu staff.
Charlie Kirk's assassination was on September 10th. A man named Tyler was arrested as the suspected shooter. The opening scene of the 1998 film Snake Eyes takes place on September 10th at a sports arena where a boxer named Tyler is fighting. Tyler's nickname is the executioner. During the fight, a man named Charles Kirkland is shot in the neck.
NYT & LA Times Reported Charlie Kirk Being Shot On Sept. 9th- The Day Before His Assassination! PLUS, Amazon Books Had “The Shooting Of Charlie Kirk” Posted 1 Day Before His Murder
If you watch the full video, shortly after the bullet pierces his neck skin blood comes pouring out. He was dead by then since blood pressure would drop precipitously.
“Yes, a person can bleed when they have been shot and killed. The extent of bleeding depends on the severity of the injury, the type of bullet, and the location of the shot. In cases of severe arterial wounds, a person could bleed out in as little as three minutes if the bullet hits an artery. Prompt medical attention is crucial to manage bleeding and prevent further complications.”
I have shot many animals in the head or neck over the more than fifty years I have been hunting. A high vel. round would have caused a catastrophic wound and a veritable fountain of blood. Brain death would have been virtually instantaneous but his heart would most likely keep beating for a time pumping blood everywhere. IMO the most likely scenario is a low velocity round fired from much closer.
it was all planned and set up. The kid is the fall guy, he wasn't even capable of shooting that well. Someone else, a trained assassin, shot Charlie. We all know that something is going on, facts point to people wanting him out of the way. He was "getting in the way". Too influential. I think about people that were evangelical preachers in the 60s, no one would have ever targeted them for spreading the will and word of god. We live in an insane time. I have lost all trust in anything that has to do with government, police, CIA, FBI, CDC WHO, you name it.. All, corrupt.
For comparison, I recently shot a 120 lb boar with a similar sized bullet from only about 50 yards away, and to my amazement the round lodged in its shoulder. It passed through a lot of soft material before hitting the shoulder/scapula region, which is not very dense bone. Boars also have super thick skin, almost plate-like around their shoulders, which helped stop the bullet, too. So no exit wound from 50 yards, and the hog just tipped over in place, it didn't go flying a dozen feet like John makes it sound like should have happened. All that to say, it's good to ask questions! I'm just saying if the "physics doesn't match up" with Charlie Kirk's tragic murder, it doesn't necessarily match up with the boar I shot, either, or the whole situation is a little more complex from a physics standpoint than we are realizing.
Agreed sir, definitely some differences in energy absorption. 10-15% more ft-lb at closer range was my point, I was surprised it didn't pass through. LH's comment above has me curious as to whether Kirk's assassin used a factory loaded round. Or maybe a heavier, subsonic factory round so it dropped more than expected and hit neck instead of head. Or hand loaded improperly so had slower muzzle velocity and greater drop than expected for that distance. The whole "neck shot" thing seems weird, it's a smaller target, so why purposely aim there?
The problem with an underloaded handload would be inconsistent ignition which would most likely negatively affect accuracy. It is also highly unlikely the bullet would "blow his head off." A properly loaded round would definitely create tremendous damage and it is unlikely that it wouldn't go clean through. From the video I saw it appeared to me that he was shot through the right side of his neck with the projectile stopping just under the skin on the left side of his neck. This is not consistent with where they claim the shooter was positioned.
According to the official story of the Martin Luther King assassination and the trial of James Earl Ray, MLK was shot with a 30:06 bullet. The bullet was recovered from his body and forensically linked to a rifle associated with Mr. Ray.
Totally. I saw several tests of the gun and bullet type used and as you said, doesn’t always happen the same each event! Or he could have loaded wrong with a less amount of ammo which could have lessened the hit. But it happened and all the speculation can’t change his assassination
I recently discovered that it's possible to load that size shell with less ammo to make it stop inside the body and not exit at all. I was told it's standard knowledge for hired assassins. It was a trick our own soldiers used in WWII to insure the enemy would fall down dead where they stood and not survive the shot any time at all.
Loading wrong kinda makes sense. Seems weird that he did a "neck shot" instead of head shot, but if round wasn't loaded correctly, it would drop more over that distance, thus a neck instead of head shot.
Very important and easy to determine. Since the bullet did not exit, all the lead could have been recovered and at minimum weighed to determine if it was a potential 30-06 lead bullet. No one has seen any results of such, from what I can tell.
IF caliber can be assured, it seems the next thing is determine if forensics prove it came from Robinson's rifle. If caliber is determined can the lead material itself be found to be the same as the other rounds found with the weapon?
These simple answers are required to determine most of the rest.
Of course, the world would love to see the X ray of Charlie's neck!
I completely agree with your analysis John!! I really do suspect foul play here and what has been reported so far in the main stream media makes no sense at all!
It seems perfectly simple to me. Authorities have lost the public trust because they're not trustworthy, period. No level of government in ANY country that I know of is populated with anything but self serving liars bought and paid for by the medical/industrial complex, which gives rise to the urgent question ... How do we replace them? Where do we find qualified people of integrity in our world? Like searching for the proverbial needle.
Quoting for emphasis what I consider the most important takeaway from this article:
"[...] (S)o many of us no longer trust our federal and state authorities to tell us the truth.
For example, we have strong grounds for suspecting that medical examiners are not diligently investigating (with the proper analytic methods) unexpected, fatal cardiac arrests in young people to determine if they were caused by vaccine-induced myocarditis."
Tucker Carlson revealed the original coroner report stated Floyd’s death was due to a drug overdose not asphyxiation. I believe that given Floyd’s preexisting heart condition and the list of drugs he ingested as well as his drug use and criminal record yet an innocent police officer remains in jail
John Leake! YOU are the perfect investigative crime reporter to get to the bottom of this assassination. The public and his family deserve to know the truth!
I am confused. Why would one need a surgeon for someone that was killed instantly? Please inform me about this. Now, I also have a few other questions. The Zapruder film of the JFK assassination is now viewable online. It plainly shows that his head snaps backward and to the left which means that the kill shot came from the front and right. My question is what happened to all the other film of the JFK assassination that the FBI confiscated? Next, why aren't any of the so-called conservative media stars not saying anything about the anomalous actions of the Kirk assassination? For my last question to Mark Levine, Bill O'Reilly, Clay and Buck, Sean Hannity, and Glenn Beck; Why aren't any of you talking about the greatest crime perpetrated upon the world? Namely, the infection of about 5,500,000,000 people worldwide with the covid shots.
Nothing about the official story makes sense.
The entire official story is a coordinated psyop.
All the independent experts have analyzed the evidence and found the motive: stop Kirk from anti-Zionist speech, and the assassins: Netanyahu and his Mossad thugs.
Courageous voices like Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, Michael Yon, ThePeoplesvoice.tv, rense.com, and more have shown us the mainstream media and US Govt is complicit and/or blackmailed to lie to the public. This is Kennedy assassination 102 and Epstein cover-up 103.
Alex Jones, though reluctant to blame Israel, said yesterday he no longer thinks Robinson was the shooter.
DUH. That was obvious from the outset.
Sure, but Jones was wanting to stick with the establishment, more "comfortable" transtifa theory, so it's good to see him giving it up.
P.S. I should have mentioned that one of the reasons Jones gave for giving up on Robinson as the shooter is the obvious coverup, with some reports, including Jones', suggesting the judge may try to gag as many as 3,000 witnesses, including event attendees and people who had interviewed Kirk.
I'm just more surprised that A.Jones would just now be relinquishing his position of support for the Tyler theory. As deeply as AJ goes into researching the establishment, you would think that his critical thinking skills warning bells would immediately clang as soon as he heard them exclaim: "We got 'im!" Unless you see the dude walk up to Charlie, point the gun in his face and pull the trigger, you don't "got 'im." in the space of 33 hours...interesting number. Careful investigation, collects ballistic evidence that may be left at the scene, collects surveillance footage, tapes off the crime scene, interviews many witnesses, including the university staff, performs an autopsy, et cetera! ...before making any DEFINITIVE statement. Maybe ask questions like, why were there no first responders and police there? Why no ambulance standibg by for precaution as was supposed to be, due to the number of attendees? That's just a few of the red flags that come to my mind, nobody, and A.Jones, with his MO and investigative mindset just accepted the official narrative as valid until now? Makes me question him and anyone who would be that willingly blind.
For those 3,000 witnesses, WE THE PEOPLE are behind You. Please don't let anyone stop You from being a Truth Teller. God loves the Truth Tellers, and WE THE PEOPLE are not getting the Truth.
And don't leave George Webb off that list.
Who is George Webb?
Thanks! I added him on my Substack list.
Do “all the independent experts” have access to all the evidence? How did they get it? Did the FBI turn it over to them? Sorry, but Candace wasn’t even invited to the memorial service, but claims to have all this inside knowledge? Haven’t seen any of the “receipts” she keeps talking about. Sorry, but I’m very skeptical that your claims have been substantiated.
Invited? Anyone could have gone. That is a silly thing to say.
She and Charlie were still friends. They were in touch. You should see the texts.
She is asking absolutely important questions. She and others are investigating because the narrative does not add up.
If you are not questioning this investigation, my only suggestion is you might need to go get a booster. The government said they're safe and effective.
Being skeptical is fine, when evidence is inconsistent with other sources or does not make sense. What specific investigative journalists do you trust in the Kirk assassination?
Who do you think did it and why?
A miracle?!?!?! Bullshit! A 30-06 bullet hitting Charlie Kirk in the neck would have literally blown his head off. It is not a "miracle" it is a fucking lie being told by Kash Patel and the Trump regime. These crooks are just as disingenuous as the Biden crime family. I am righteously pissed off because I voted for these motherfuckers.
I am totally fed up with Trump's ultra-Zionism and his promoting the genocide of the Palestinians in Gaza. I relinquish my support of these fucking ghouls.
\\][//
Absofugginlutely I feel the same. Utter & complete bullshit the story they’re tryin 2 tell. A 30-06 round at that distance would’ve taken his head completely off & would’ve kept going until it struck a solid object. Not a single fuckin chance in hell his neck stopped that size of round at that close of a distance. They’re all bullshitting & gaslighting everyone except the internet is forever & there’s way 2 many people digging deep & their story is rapidly falling apart.
With you 100%. Must ask, what does bibi have on trump?
"what does bibi have on trump?"~M. Dowrick
Nothing, they are both just flaming Zionist fanatics.
\\][//
Shifty eyes Patel has been compromised.
lol. 30.06??? Show us the bullet.
We notice that the unnamed surgeon didn't state the caliber of the bullet. But oddly, we know the names of the surgeons at Timpanogos Regional Hospital because IP addresses in DC and Israel were searching on the hospital, its surgeons, and even Tyler Robinson during a two-week period back in July (https://www.youtube.com/@realbaronpodcast). It's like someone could envision the future.
No one should believe this nonsense of a bullet not going thru his cervical spine and exiting.
Former Green Beret and citizen journalist Nate Cornacchia breaks down three major anomalies that 100% throw the official Charlie Kirk assassination narrative into question.
Is Charlie Kirks shooting just theater?
Investigators ask, why is there no visible blood at the scene of Charlie Kirk's assassination?
1. There should have been blood everywhere, no one tried to stop the bleeding. Their hands had zero blood on them. No one tried to save his life?
Carotid arteries are blood vessels supplying blood to the brain, face, and neck, sending oxygen-rich blood to the brain and other parts of the head and neck.
The coronary arteries wrap around the entire heart. The two main branches are the left coronary artery and right coronary artery.
"Apply direct, firm pressure to the wound using a sterile bandage or clean cloth. Use the heel of your hand to press down as hard as you can. Do not lift the cloth to check the wound; if blood soaks through, add more gauze or cloth on top and continue pressing."
https://banned.video/watch?id=68e0420ab357a70c7e7b7ebc
We still have seen any CCTV from the Hospital of Mr. Kirk being pushed or carried in the ER. Have you located any?
Shocking footage emerges: CHARLIE KIRK’S BODY rushed to hospital. No footage of Mr. Kirk at the hospital.
Why?
No blood on the ground or on the hands. There is no image of BleedStop being applied to Mr. Kirk’s neck. Not sure you could stop the bleeding.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HZEGplwWRw
“Yes, a person can bleed when they have been shot and killed. The extent of bleeding depends on the severity of the injury, the type of bullet, and the location of the shot. In cases of severe arterial wounds, a person could bleed out in as little as three minutes if the bullet hits an artery. Prompt medical attention is crucial to manage bleeding and prevent further complications.”
https://www.calendar-canada.ca/frequently-asked-questions/how-long-does-it-take-for-a-gunshot-wou
Those are the questions that need answers. Where was all the blood that should’ve sprayed everywhere & everything. Zero blood on any of the people around Charlie & none of them actively trying to stop the bleeding nor where any chest compressions being attempted. They were just handing things off 2 other people. Where is all the footage as you indicated… where’s the footage from the tpu staff.
Yes, I believe it is a psyop. And they are telling us.
The book that was published on Amazon before Kirk was "shot" was by "Anastasia J Casey" - One case of resurrection.
Anyone here do crosswords?
Anastasia means resurrection in Greek, J is used as a i in Latin, (number one) Case...(y)
https://web.archive.org/web/20250911163616/https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FQMF466K
While the book was briefly available on Amazon The original link has been erased so here is another.
https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2025/09/fact-check-the-shooting-of-charlie-kirk-book-was-not-published-by-anastasia-j-casey-before-kirk-shooting.html
Charlie Kirk's assassination was on September 10th. A man named Tyler was arrested as the suspected shooter. The opening scene of the 1998 film Snake Eyes takes place on September 10th at a sports arena where a boxer named Tyler is fighting. Tyler's nickname is the executioner. During the fight, a man named Charles Kirkland is shot in the neck.
My lucky number... What?
https://gregreese.substack.com/p/magikal-spells-for-the-masses?utm_source=podcast-email&publication_id=706779&post_id=174553045&utm_campaign=email-play-on-substack&utm_content=watch_now_button&r=smi2v&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
ISRAEL'S CHIEF RABBI wrote a condolence letter about CHARLIE KIRK'S DEATH on September 2nd, 8 days BEFORE THE ASSASSINATION.
The Hebrew calendar date 9 Elul, 5785 corresponds with September 2, 2025. The letter is still LIVE on the Israel Heritage Foundation (
@IHF_Heritage) X account.
https://x.com/jacksonhinklle/status/1968221132588257543
**************
NYT & LA Times Reported Charlie Kirk Being Shot On Sept. 9th- The Day Before His Assassination! PLUS, Amazon Books Had “The Shooting Of Charlie Kirk” Posted 1 Day Before His Murder
https://banned.video/watch?id=68c30d69bbd81cebcbdc766f
Anastasia J. Casey's The Shooting Of Charlie Kirk book gets published a day before Trump ally's killing. Full controversy explained
https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/world/anastasia-j-caseys-the-shooting-of-charlie-kirk-book-gets-published-a-day-before-trump-allys-killing-full-controversy-explained/ar-AA1MrGWR
Nothing @IHF_Heritage for Sept 2. Has it been [Re]moved????
A relative of mine who is a green beret also said the same thing.
Everyone is lying, will we ever know why..
If you watch the full video, shortly after the bullet pierces his neck skin blood comes pouring out. He was dead by then since blood pressure would drop precipitously.
“Yes, a person can bleed when they have been shot and killed. The extent of bleeding depends on the severity of the injury, the type of bullet, and the location of the shot. In cases of severe arterial wounds, a person could bleed out in as little as three minutes if the bullet hits an artery. Prompt medical attention is crucial to manage bleeding and prevent further complications.”
https://www.calendar-canada.ca/frequently-asked-questions/how-long-does-it-take-for-a-gunshot-wound-to-bleed
I have shot many animals in the head or neck over the more than fifty years I have been hunting. A high vel. round would have caused a catastrophic wound and a veritable fountain of blood. Brain death would have been virtually instantaneous but his heart would most likely keep beating for a time pumping blood everywhere. IMO the most likely scenario is a low velocity round fired from much closer.
Wouldn't it be nice if for once we weren't lied to?
Too much money and power on the line to be truthful with the lowly citizens.
it was all planned and set up. The kid is the fall guy, he wasn't even capable of shooting that well. Someone else, a trained assassin, shot Charlie. We all know that something is going on, facts point to people wanting him out of the way. He was "getting in the way". Too influential. I think about people that were evangelical preachers in the 60s, no one would have ever targeted them for spreading the will and word of god. We live in an insane time. I have lost all trust in anything that has to do with government, police, CIA, FBI, CDC WHO, you name it.. All, corrupt.
As far as corruption, please add the schools, hospitals, and most doctors. Oh and many of the churches.
For comparison, I recently shot a 120 lb boar with a similar sized bullet from only about 50 yards away, and to my amazement the round lodged in its shoulder. It passed through a lot of soft material before hitting the shoulder/scapula region, which is not very dense bone. Boars also have super thick skin, almost plate-like around their shoulders, which helped stop the bullet, too. So no exit wound from 50 yards, and the hog just tipped over in place, it didn't go flying a dozen feet like John makes it sound like should have happened. All that to say, it's good to ask questions! I'm just saying if the "physics doesn't match up" with Charlie Kirk's tragic murder, it doesn't necessarily match up with the boar I shot, either, or the whole situation is a little more complex from a physics standpoint than we are realizing.
The boar's body absorbed the energy of the bullet, certainly massive internal damage, thorax of large wild boar not comparable to human neck.
Agreed sir, definitely some differences in energy absorption. 10-15% more ft-lb at closer range was my point, I was surprised it didn't pass through. LH's comment above has me curious as to whether Kirk's assassin used a factory loaded round. Or maybe a heavier, subsonic factory round so it dropped more than expected and hit neck instead of head. Or hand loaded improperly so had slower muzzle velocity and greater drop than expected for that distance. The whole "neck shot" thing seems weird, it's a smaller target, so why purposely aim there?
The problem with an underloaded handload would be inconsistent ignition which would most likely negatively affect accuracy. It is also highly unlikely the bullet would "blow his head off." A properly loaded round would definitely create tremendous damage and it is unlikely that it wouldn't go clean through. From the video I saw it appeared to me that he was shot through the right side of his neck with the projectile stopping just under the skin on the left side of his neck. This is not consistent with where they claim the shooter was positioned.
According to the official story of the Martin Luther King assassination and the trial of James Earl Ray, MLK was shot with a 30:06 bullet. The bullet was recovered from his body and forensically linked to a rifle associated with Mr. Ray.
Totally. I saw several tests of the gun and bullet type used and as you said, doesn’t always happen the same each event! Or he could have loaded wrong with a less amount of ammo which could have lessened the hit. But it happened and all the speculation can’t change his assassination
I recently discovered that it's possible to load that size shell with less ammo to make it stop inside the body and not exit at all. I was told it's standard knowledge for hired assassins. It was a trick our own soldiers used in WWII to insure the enemy would fall down dead where they stood and not survive the shot any time at all.
On the theater of battle, the wounded are the greater newest liability.
Aid must be attempted. The dead are left till a more convenient time.
The wounded require more men that could have been used in active combat
It was not uncommon for instructions to wound rather than eliminate totally.
On both sides.
The bullet is just one aspect of this whole bogus story.
Loading wrong kinda makes sense. Seems weird that he did a "neck shot" instead of head shot, but if round wasn't loaded correctly, it would drop more over that distance, thus a neck instead of head shot.
Caliber? Bullet weight and type? Depth of penetration? The authorities haven't disclosed the bullet weight and type, but they should have.
Very important and easy to determine. Since the bullet did not exit, all the lead could have been recovered and at minimum weighed to determine if it was a potential 30-06 lead bullet. No one has seen any results of such, from what I can tell.
IF caliber can be assured, it seems the next thing is determine if forensics prove it came from Robinson's rifle. If caliber is determined can the lead material itself be found to be the same as the other rounds found with the weapon?
These simple answers are required to determine most of the rest.
Of course, the world would love to see the X ray of Charlie's neck!
Another inside job….
I completely agree with your analysis John!! I really do suspect foul play here and what has been reported so far in the main stream media makes no sense at all!
It seems perfectly simple to me. Authorities have lost the public trust because they're not trustworthy, period. No level of government in ANY country that I know of is populated with anything but self serving liars bought and paid for by the medical/industrial complex, which gives rise to the urgent question ... How do we replace them? Where do we find qualified people of integrity in our world? Like searching for the proverbial needle.
Quoting for emphasis what I consider the most important takeaway from this article:
"[...] (S)o many of us no longer trust our federal and state authorities to tell us the truth.
For example, we have strong grounds for suspecting that medical examiners are not diligently investigating (with the proper analytic methods) unexpected, fatal cardiac arrests in young people to determine if they were caused by vaccine-induced myocarditis."
Tucker Carlson revealed the original coroner report stated Floyd’s death was due to a drug overdose not asphyxiation. I believe that given Floyd’s preexisting heart condition and the list of drugs he ingested as well as his drug use and criminal record yet an innocent police officer remains in jail
John Leake! YOU are the perfect investigative crime reporter to get to the bottom of this assassination. The public and his family deserve to know the truth!
Just like JFK, another cover up with an implausible explanation. They're rubbing our noses in it. 'See what we can do with impunity?'
More distraction, more criminal behavior... these crooks gotta pay for their hubris.
I am confused. Why would one need a surgeon for someone that was killed instantly? Please inform me about this. Now, I also have a few other questions. The Zapruder film of the JFK assassination is now viewable online. It plainly shows that his head snaps backward and to the left which means that the kill shot came from the front and right. My question is what happened to all the other film of the JFK assassination that the FBI confiscated? Next, why aren't any of the so-called conservative media stars not saying anything about the anomalous actions of the Kirk assassination? For my last question to Mark Levine, Bill O'Reilly, Clay and Buck, Sean Hannity, and Glenn Beck; Why aren't any of you talking about the greatest crime perpetrated upon the world? Namely, the infection of about 5,500,000,000 people worldwide with the covid shots.