Understanding Bioweapons
Transmissibility and uncertainty do more damage than virulence.
It seems to me that the primary military value of bioweapons lies not in their immediate lethality, but in their ability to spread rapidly and make people sick, even if the sickness ultimately proves to have a low case fatality rate. This is because it takes time to ascertain the following:
1). How sick is this novel infection going to make people?
2). Even if people recover from the acute infection, will they suffer serious sequelae?
3). Are there high-risk groups within the overall population?
4). What is the best way to treat the illness among high risk groups?
The process of answering these questions will take time—especially given the inability of most medical doctors to think independently—and will also be retarded by propaganda, fear, and confusion.
By the time the reality of the situation is widely understood, the abominable state may have undertaken all manner of schemes that are inimical to civil society and constitutional protections while transferring billions of taxpayer money to military and bio-pharmaceutical interests.
Viewed in this light, it seems to me that SARS-CoV-2 (the causative agent of COVID-19) was by far the most effective bioweapon ever created.
As I wrote in my post earlier today about H5N1 Bird Flu—Will the Empire Strike Back with Bird Flu—I am concerned that this pathogen could serve as the basis for yet another laboratory manipulated bioweapon that could do enormous social, economic, and political damage, even if its case fatality rate ultimately proves to be low.
When I write about H5N1 bird flu, many readers respond with the assertion “We’re not doing this again.” While I appreciate and share their sentiment, we must consider the possibility that H5N1 could, in theory, be manipulated to make it highly transmissible to humans and to make them gravely ill, even if it proves to kill only a small percentage of the population.
Some of my fellow Substack authors have asserted that bio-technicians simply cannot manipulate viruses to make them transmissible and pathogenic to humans. While I wish I could share their sanguine view, I cannot overlook the mountain of evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was indeed created in bio-labs, was indeed highly transmissible, and did indeed cause many people to fall gravely ill, even if it only killed a minuscule percentage of the population.
Until people I trust can adequately explain what happened to all of the influenza cases that vanished during 2020-2021 and then demonstrate that "covid" was a distinct and identifiable unique pathogen with an actual ability to make people sick versus deliberate hospital and health care protocols that truly caused the problems, I am not convinced there was anything other than a great deception, not a great infection. If we simply had a bad flu season whereby 100,000 people died - typically about 60-80k people die...so do the math with an aggressive mortality rate of flu of .1% - then what was "covid" responsible for? Remember, the charts still say that during "covid-19" there were only 4,000 flu cases.
So many lies including current "vaccine" and "treatment" studies are built upon and amplified by this foundation of lies that no one seems to be getting to the bottom of.
I’m really bothered by all the ppl within the “medical freedom movement” insisting that viruses do not exist. Maybe I just don’t understand enough about it, but it seems to just further confuse ppl. As soon as ppl start understanding that SARS COV 2, for example, can be detected by PCR, but the detection alone doesn’t mean one is “sick with COVID”, some ppl jumped straight to “well you can’t be sick with COVID bc viruses don’t even exist”. As soon as we establish that there was no “pandemic driven by asymptomatic spread”, they jump straight to “there’s no asymptomatic spread bc there’s no virus”.
Ok, then, what was it?? Bc my family and I most certainly had SOMETHING that we had never experienced before. So did a lot of ppl. It was unusual in every way. Thankfully we got sick during Omicron, so our symptoms were upper respiratory in nature, and I firmly believe that our symptoms were fairly mild BECAUSE we were unvaccinated (and remain so). Getting back to my point, these ppl are now using the assertion that viruses don’t exist to discredit anyone operating under the established medical belief that viruses DO exist. I’ve even seen them go after Dr McCullough for “taking advantage” of ppl by selling kits to address a number of illnesses. As a layman, it’s incredibly frustrating, bc while I’ve educated myself as much as possible (and continue to), even learning how to read medical journals and studies to the extent that I’m able given my level of understanding, sorting through the mountains of data is nearly impossible. Thankfully, I’ve been really good at deciding who to listen to and who not to. Meaning that if someone has predicted correctly, and adjusted their model as more information came in, then I listen to what they have to say. Ppl who stay stuck on a particular narrative, despite having more information that should cause them to adjust course but doesn’t, I put them aside. This helps a great deal—just knowing who is likely telling the truth based on their actions—but it’s still just so much to try and understand. My conclusions so far are fairly simple: SARS COV 2 is likely a bioweapon meant to weaken a population, and it was used as a means of control, and whether it was intentionally released or whether it was an opportunistic power grab, the results are the same. I have to conclude that viruses, or at least what we call viruses, DO exist, and they do spread throughout a population, and once they hit the ground running there’s no stopping them until herd immunity is reached, and our herd immunity was disrupted by a transfection agent that makes the vaccinated incapable of mounting an effective defense against future variants. Furthermore, the “vaccine” has killed and injured millions of ppl, yet it’s still being pushed on our most vulnerable members, our very future, and if it’s not stopped, I worry that this could result in effective extinction. I know that last part sounds a little melodramatic, but there’s plenty of evidence supporting this as a possible outcome simply bc we CANNOT know how these shots will effect the complex systems they were literally injected into.
This substack has been, and continues to be, a wonderful source of information, and the two of you (Peter McCullough and John Leake) are two of the few I trust bc you’re two of only a few who constantly readjust your models to deal with the influx of new data, and I’m grateful.