Charlie Kirk built TPUSA to instruct young men with conservative instincts, and in twelve years it became a powerful institution. Did Kirk ultimately refuse to serve as a Pied Piper?
TPUSA wasted no time after his assassination appointing his wife as the new CEO. It seemed a bit odd to me at the time. On the one hand I could see why the organization would want to keep the Kirk name at the top, and immediately it became clear that her name was being used to monetize the tragedy. That is not unprecedented when tragedies of such a nature occur and I don’t want to be crass here. The odd part of the announcement was that it was not an interim appointment(such rapid changes in leadership usually are), where such issues as qualifications, early performance on the job and best candidate searches are normally assessed. What I noticed was that the many emails I received from Erika Kirk after she was appointed CEO were 100% focused on her experience of grief after her loss. This was understandable on a personal level but caused me to wonder what was actually going on in the background and who might be the real new boss of TPUSA. Even if this was just about opportunistic monetization the questions remain.
Sorry but no one that is with TPUSA right now, even comes close to what CK brought to the table. I would never watch TPUSA if MM, EK or that Kolvet guy takes his place. For now, not interested in TPUSA. I do love watching videos of CK, which I will keep doing. There is a special place in hell for all those involved or were complicet in his assassination. I truly believe that.
No he did create an organization, but there isn't anyone there now that I'm interested in listening to. Sorry, he was that good in bringing things too light. I have very high standards and CK was just that good. If he created a cult, then I would be still listening to whatever TPUSA had to say.
Cults are secretive by definition. They seclude themselves from the outside world. TPUSA was neither secretive nor seclusive 😂…
Charlie Kirk’s talent, personality, and spirit are irreplaceable. He had a respectfully honest, openly approachable, innately curious way about him that connected with gen z… It’s the rare combination of these unique characteristics that makes him irreplaceable… not his CEO title.
not really if it is centered around the leader. Charlie wasn't planning on leaving yet, and would have trained someone up I am sure. NOw we find out that in 2024, TP USA bought millions of dollars in life insurance, paid by the TP including taxes. Who was the beneficiary? We also found out that millions in revenue is missing just according to an accountant auditing the books.
“…according to an accountant auditing the books” ? Who/which outlet reported this information? Does this accountant have a name?
It is par for the course for an organization to insure its key executives… The policy can help offset lost revenue and stabilize the business during a period of uncertainty following the CEO's death. it’s referred to as corporate-owned life insurance (COLI), often called "key person insurance," designed to protect the company financially if a crucial employee dies unexpectedly. It protects the family and the business. The corporation pays for the policy and associated taxes, and the insured is legally required to give consent.
Erica was put into the position because Charlie had previously told the board members to put her into the position as leader if anything had ever happened to him
I know that because I still listen to the Charlie Kirk show podcast and Andrew Kolvet and Mikey (Don't remember his last name but he is Charlie's Chief of staff ) outright reported that Charlie told them to do that if something ever happened to him. Not everything is a conspiracy theory
Monterey - AGREED, I also watched the TPUSA podcast too where they stated that Charlie Kirk had told them that he wanted Erika to lead TPUSA if anything happened to him.
Sorry, MM behavior is so suspect. He was supposed to be a best friend but the shot came and he didn't even do on Charlie, literally turned around and left. What could he tell anyone? He didn't stick around to find out? It's like he knew and reported in.
I believe you are very correct. The world is a stage, don't think even for a moment that the Greatest script ever written isn't playing out before the whole world's lying eyes. Know that those Golden rings that she showed US so clearly aren't at play. The Golden G. The golden g. Now think, whose playing who . whoville, SAM, I AM, green eggs and ham slam Sam I AM. Fall cabal fall. Your Awesome for knowing who Erika really is. Y'all come back now ya hear. LOVE Y All
Yep, . common cents. Only works when you slow down and count Rach little seent. Quick swipes are rotting the depths of not just the brain , perception is being brought for the ride. Reality is far from truth at this point. The devil is in the details.
I have zero doubt there was a plan in place in the event of Charlie’s death… be it by illness, accidental, or assination. I don’t see Erika Kirk’s appointment as a tell-tale sign of opportunistic monetization. As his partner in everything… including TPUSA… she was the obvious choice. I would have preferred to see someone else step-up temporarily to give her time to breath, but they did what felt right and honorable at the time… so be it.
Erika tries hard…sometimes awkwardly hard… to appear strong in public. However, I have no doubt, when she’s home alone… stuck in her own thoughts, the suffering she endures is very real, very painful, and often paralyzing. Unfortunately, there is never a shortage of apathy, criticism, and claws in the general public.
I have learned one sure thing throughout my personal and professional life… Prayer is powerful. As the shock continues to subside, a solid, planned, longterm strategy will unfold. Most likely after the holidays, early into next year. My current understanding is that Erika’s focus will be leading primarily the women of TPUSA… which is, more or less, in line with the “born again” evangelistic view of Christianity. With that said, it is possible that a handful of select young men will slowly emerge as obvious role models for the organization as a whole… thus, avoiding the constant 1:1 comparison to Charlie.
No, there will never be another quite like Charlie Kirk.
Doesn't matter who they get, CK was it. I don't follow TPUSA or his channel because I have a very unsettling gut feeling about TPUSA now that CK is gone.
That's right, Proberta. I have been surprised by the number of commentators on "the freedom side" who have accepted Charlie's "assassination" as real. It was a classic Freemasonic/Jesuit/Zionist ritual sacrifice mass trauma event by the numbers psy-op. Bit of a mouthful, but that describes it. Yes, the character "Charlie Kirk", after a decade playing his role, has been removed from their "world stage", but the actor who played him remains alive. As with the fake "Trump assassination attempt", no-one was killed. Who knows, the "CK actor" may reappear some time in the future, albeit in a different guise...after all he did a good job for his masters. As I say repeatedly, "We live in a world of deception".
Its so disheartening to see how many comentators fell for the Kirk shooting. Especially so soon after the fake AF Trump shooting.
But they're commentators, not Conspiracy Theorists.
So either they're Newbies who haven't been exposed to False F1ags and Crysis Actors (or haven't watched 'Wag The Dog'! ;), and they probably still believe Al Queda took down the World Trade Center.
💯true.So refreshing seeing some one else here got it.CK is a CIA psyop , mos def not dead.It's all circus for our gullible eyes.NO ONE gets into that high a position w/o being one of them.Thank you !
How about this instead? Charlie was a lifetime actor installed as the head of project TPUSA as a Zionist/NeoCon organization that was to keep ConInc at the forefront of young people. He has no backstory whatsoever, he's a college dropout who instantly gets millions of startup money from big Jewish donors, to start a debating club, basically. I'd argue that he wasn't actually all that influential from an organic perspective. Later his script changes to that of a "family" man. They assign another lifetime actor, Erika, who has VERY dubious ties, to play his wife. They give him some kids, which... can ANYONE provide a photo of their faces? These kids don't exist. I challenge anyone to give an explanation why there are zero facial pictures of these kids. Don't tell me they were THAT private. This is the modern age, someone, somewhere, would have uploaded a pic or two of this family. But no, they don't exist. Then the script calls for the big show!!!! Time to exit stage left (like literally he exited stage left) Now we have a 3 ring circus that rivals that of a president or king. Lifetime actor, Candace, is playing the Anti-Zionist fool. She's purposely stirring up the drama and at some point it's going to make her and her followers look like idiots. A lot like the "Flat Earth" project did. No matter how right you are on any subject, if you bought into flat earth you're tarred forever. Tucker is another one. He's basically a toned down and reasonable Alex Jones gatekeeping to keep people pacified and on the reservation. Meanwhile, ConInc is putting more surveillance, more rules, more laws, and more obstacles to real freedom than ever before all with the blessing of the masses who have been duped. That's my theory.
So, that's interesting. Here's a doozy to add to it. JFK wasn't assassinated. That was all theater and super fake. Just view the "autopsy" photos. Totally not JFK, not even close. There's a lot more to it of course. What's funny is how Lincoln and JFK had so many eerie coincidences in their life and death. Well, it turns out that Lincoln also faked his death. So yet again, we have the scriptwriters either intentionally mocking us or just lazy. AND JFK & Lincoln were both almost certainly gay. Lincoln had Joshua Speed and despite the "womanizing" of JFK, he had his best friend Lem Billings (openly gay) live at the white house. I think the womanizing was all a beard, as homosexuality wasn't exactly mainstream in the 60's.
For the record: I have no research background in Lincoln's death but I am confident that Kennedy died that day.
Lately it is discouraging to try to investigate 'reality,' since anyone can publish fictitious facts, and beautifully doctored photos, but that does not negate serious (and laborious) research.
You're so right. It is almost impossible at this point. The problem with research is source material. Take JFK's murder. How much of it is real? Eye witnesses are unreliable at best. "Official" government docs can be faked for sure. Did you know that there isn't a single photo of a civil war battle? Why is that? Because most of it was fake. Look at almost any photo pre-1900 and they're almost all doctored (photoshopped as it were) Just look at the skies. They've been erased. Not theory, actually been cut out and brushed over. Officially they say it was to erase the power lines and give the photos a cleaner look. That's fine, but it proves they had the ability to doctor photo's from the very start. Most WW2 photo's are all doctored. Once you see the pattern, you can't unsee it. Which goes back to investigation. How do we prove anything? Well I can tell you, that in a murder, you have to prove there was a person killed. For Charlie Kirk, that totally hasn't been done. We have zero evidence of his murder, because we don't have any proof. Not even a basic autopsy. We have some government statements that are vague. At least with JFK we had an autopsy. Autopsies used to be public domain, and they released his. I encourage you to view the autopsy photos of JFK. There's a resemblance, but key critical ear, face, and bone structures just don't change like that. It can not be the same person. There is absolutely so much more to the story that begins with his father. As an example, take his older brother, Joe Jr. That's the most ridiculous story ever. It doesn't even begin to make sense. These people are life time American nobility. There's not a chance his first born son would take on a stupid mission like that. As for the "real" son... who knows? i wouldn't doubt it. There are so many levels of fakery that are actually really easy to perpetrate on the masses. It doesn't take many people in fact to pull these off. Even something so stupid as the moon landing, wouldn't have required more than 30 people in the know. The Charlie Kirk event would have required probably about the same given that we are so much more media saturated now. But JFK could easily wanted out of the spotlight, to retire to Kenebunkport and live out the few years he had left in peace and quiet. Remember, he wasn't well at all. Same with Lincoln. They had little time left, so exit stage left, cause a political firestorm and get the masses all stirred up. Lot's of psychological warfare reasons not to mention the political. In the end, it's a lot easier to fake a murder than pull one off.
💯 true.Came here to comment pretty much the same but got discouraged by all those comments crying about poor Charlie and "wife" Erika .They're all controlled opposition :Charlie, Erika, Candace, Tucker, Alex Jones, Joe Rogan, etc.Just CIA/Mossad psyops.The real opposition gets suicided fast.People still dont get it that's why all those ops work so well on us , dividing us left & right,keeping us busy fighting each other.So so sad !
I value other’s opinions and consider myself quite open-minded but… “100% true theory?”That’s an oxymoron. It’s not really even a theory based on the definition “well-substantiated explanations that connect and explain a collection of facts, laws, and tested hypotheses”.
It’s a conspiracy theory by definition. And I don’t mean this negatively… many conspiracy theories have been proven over time, no doubt.
I'm sorry if i offended you, Michelle.My reply was to Ranch comment, not yours.I try to avoid engaging w/ people affected by cognitive dissonance as i find it useless.And the "theory" was just a typo , rushing to formulate an articulate response.🤷🏻♀️
Sure they do but they always FAIL in the ubiquitous smartphone age. So you have seen their faces? Do you know what show or event it was at? Because it will have a record of it somewhere and most probably can be retrieved. Google's AI said there are none on the internet. That's weird.
Can’t canswer that. However, I respectfully disagree with the premise that “they (famous people) ALWAYS fail.” Charlie and his daughter were on Fox and Friends.with that said, their family lives 6.2 miles from my home in Phoenix and I have seen them in public together.
First off, you write really well. Second, i'm a Miles Mathis student, so none of this is original to me per se. These things just seem to follow the same scripts over and over. It's as if the creative talent at Langley or Mossad isn't quite up to the task anymore so they keep recycling the same old stories. Third, I like to spread the "Fake and Gay" message as much as possible, not to black pill people as much as to let us realize it's all just theater. Sure there are definitely real world consequences, but there are regardless of whether we know it or not. Also, it detracts from getting worked up over any news of the day and also keeps you grounded knowing that there's really not much to be done about it. Personally, I don't think we plebs get much say in life other than a small circle of influence. Seems you're part of the ruling class or you're not. I've come to the conclusion that almost no one in the US breaks out of their class. Not in the last 100 years at least. Probably much much longer. So as a proud member of the slave class, I just enjoy the show and let others know as well. Sadly, the masses have almost zero influence on our rulers. I think they stage these plays as part of a strange alchemical ritual in order to cause chaos and misery. Maybe it's a type of spiritual food for these devils. My only question right now is why are THE Jews (as opposed to all Jews) allowing such a radical change in the script. I don't believe people like Tucker or Candace and many more are organic. The biggest narrative from the CK debacle is that he was "Noticing" how the Jews are behaving. So if it's all theater, then that's part of it which is kinda counter intuitive if you're THE Jews. I'm leaning that they are trying to separate and divide the "antisemites" from the rest. Maybe to later corral them into a dead end, or even possibly to a worse end. It's not like THE Jews really care about public opinion to be honest. They've been shitlords for the last 80 years and it hasn't stopped them one bit. They have power. They have money. Not much you can't do with those two. But it is a fascinating twist. We'll see how it plays out I guess.
I have no idea. I suck at predicting anything, lol. I thought I could read the tea leaves for a while, but after Covid, everything has gone down the Wonderland rabbit hole. Nothing makes any sense by comparing it to past events. Logic and reason seem useless. I mean, why is fuel so cheap yet cooking oil is 5x's the price?
Charlie Kirk, after being shot, held onto his microphone for a couple of seconds until just before the camera panned away…
AI response to my question, "Could a person who'd been shot through the neck continue to grip an object?"
A person shot in the neck would likely lose the ability to hold any object in their hand immediately. The injury typically causes rapid loss of consciousness due to massive blood loss, damage to the spinal cord, or disruption of blood flow to the brain, leading to the body going limp. The severe trauma, including potential damage to the spinal cord which controls signals from the brain to the body, would result in an immediate loss of muscle control and posture.
The neck contains vital structures like the carotid arteries and the spinal cord. A gunshot wound can cause catastrophic blood loss from major vessels, leading to hypovolemic shock and rapid unconsciousness.
Damage to the spinal cord in the neck can sever the connection between the brain and the body, causing paralysis and an immediate loss of the ability to maintain posture or grip objects.
The intense pain and shock from the injury, combined with the sudden drop in blood pressure and oxygen to the brain, would prevent any conscious effort to hold onto an object.
Even if the person remained conscious for a brief moment, the physical trauma and neurological damage would make it impossible to maintain a grip.
If he held onto the microphone, he was playing a role - and very badly - before being carted off, never to be seen again, allowing for the crime scene to be conveniently contaminated and paved over.
Classic decorticate posture—that is, an abnormal body posture characterized by flexion of the upper limbs—caused by severe trauma to the central nervous system.
Charlie Kirk (RIP) was building a base for his presidential campaign, and this was how he was doing it.
Lebo Von Lo~Debar
Former/Always 82nd Airborne Infantryman, Disabled Veteran for Life, & Author of the book, "The Separation of Corporation and State" subtitled "Common Sense and the Two-Party Crisis" Available on Amazon.
"As Jordan Peterson pointed out in an interview with Charlie Kirk a few months before Kirk’s death, about 4% of every society is composed of “predatory parasites.”
THAT'S rich, coming from Peterson!
Because he IS one of those 'PREDATORY PARASITES'!
BOUGHT and PAID FOR, by........Iz-ra-HELL!!
LITMUS TEST: If one is NOT, and JUSTIFIABLY so, trashing Iz-ra-HELL and Zionism/Zionists......they ARE 'ONE OF THEM'. (a SATANIST!)
John, please explain what you are aiming at: who what where when and why. The why is partially understood, but what makes you make this claim of suspicion?
For now at least, a lot remains to be discovered. Perhaps John is encouraging readers to look into it themselves. Maybe he isn't ready to make any accusations, and rightfully so. There are many who have devoted a lot of effort to trying to figure this out who publish online.
TPUSA wasted no time after his assassination appointing his wife as the new CEO. It seemed a bit odd to me at the time. On the one hand I could see why the organization would want to keep the Kirk name at the top, and immediately it became clear that her name was being used to monetize the tragedy. That is not unprecedented when tragedies of such a nature occur and I don’t want to be crass here. The odd part of the announcement was that it was not an interim appointment(such rapid changes in leadership usually are), where such issues as qualifications, early performance on the job and best candidate searches are normally assessed. What I noticed was that the many emails I received from Erika Kirk after she was appointed CEO were 100% focused on her experience of grief after her loss. This was understandable on a personal level but caused me to wonder what was actually going on in the background and who might be the real new boss of TPUSA. Even if this was just about opportunistic monetization the questions remain.
Sorry but no one that is with TPUSA right now, even comes close to what CK brought to the table. I would never watch TPUSA if MM, EK or that Kolvet guy takes his place. For now, not interested in TPUSA. I do love watching videos of CK, which I will keep doing. There is a special place in hell for all those involved or were complicet in his assassination. I truly believe that.
If that is true then he didn’t create an organization, he created a cult. No one in a successful organization is irreplaceable, by definition.
No he did create an organization, but there isn't anyone there now that I'm interested in listening to. Sorry, he was that good in bringing things too light. I have very high standards and CK was just that good. If he created a cult, then I would be still listening to whatever TPUSA had to say.
😂good point.
Cults are secretive by definition. They seclude themselves from the outside world. TPUSA was neither secretive nor seclusive 😂…
Charlie Kirk’s talent, personality, and spirit are irreplaceable. He had a respectfully honest, openly approachable, innately curious way about him that connected with gen z… It’s the rare combination of these unique characteristics that makes him irreplaceable… not his CEO title.
not really if it is centered around the leader. Charlie wasn't planning on leaving yet, and would have trained someone up I am sure. NOw we find out that in 2024, TP USA bought millions of dollars in life insurance, paid by the TP including taxes. Who was the beneficiary? We also found out that millions in revenue is missing just according to an accountant auditing the books.
“…according to an accountant auditing the books” ? Who/which outlet reported this information? Does this accountant have a name?
It is par for the course for an organization to insure its key executives… The policy can help offset lost revenue and stabilize the business during a period of uncertainty following the CEO's death. it’s referred to as corporate-owned life insurance (COLI), often called "key person insurance," designed to protect the company financially if a crucial employee dies unexpectedly. It protects the family and the business. The corporation pays for the policy and associated taxes, and the insured is legally required to give consent.
The primary beneficiary was/is most likely TPUSA.
Erica was put into the position because Charlie had previously told the board members to put her into the position as leader if anything had ever happened to him
Interesting. How do you know that? I can’t fathom being a mother of two toddlers and carrying on. I would be scared out of my mind.
After seeing the very public execution of my husband and the abject failure of his security, I would have gone into total seclusion.
I know that because I still listen to the Charlie Kirk show podcast and Andrew Kolvet and Mikey (Don't remember his last name but he is Charlie's Chief of staff ) outright reported that Charlie told them to do that if something ever happened to him. Not everything is a conspiracy theory
Monterey - AGREED, I also watched the TPUSA podcast too where they stated that Charlie Kirk had told them that he wanted Erika to lead TPUSA if anything happened to him.
Sorry, MM behavior is so suspect. He was supposed to be a best friend but the shot came and he didn't even do on Charlie, literally turned around and left. What could he tell anyone? He didn't stick around to find out? It's like he knew and reported in.
Obviously, Erica is a very courageous woman
I believe you are very correct. The world is a stage, don't think even for a moment that the Greatest script ever written isn't playing out before the whole world's lying eyes. Know that those Golden rings that she showed US so clearly aren't at play. The Golden G. The golden g. Now think, whose playing who . whoville, SAM, I AM, green eggs and ham slam Sam I AM. Fall cabal fall. Your Awesome for knowing who Erika really is. Y'all come back now ya hear. LOVE Y All
The storylines aren't very great anymore. The common person is so gullible they don't even put effort into them.
Yep, . common cents. Only works when you slow down and count Rach little seent. Quick swipes are rotting the depths of not just the brain , perception is being brought for the ride. Reality is far from truth at this point. The devil is in the details.
I have zero doubt there was a plan in place in the event of Charlie’s death… be it by illness, accidental, or assination. I don’t see Erika Kirk’s appointment as a tell-tale sign of opportunistic monetization. As his partner in everything… including TPUSA… she was the obvious choice. I would have preferred to see someone else step-up temporarily to give her time to breath, but they did what felt right and honorable at the time… so be it.
Erika tries hard…sometimes awkwardly hard… to appear strong in public. However, I have no doubt, when she’s home alone… stuck in her own thoughts, the suffering she endures is very real, very painful, and often paralyzing. Unfortunately, there is never a shortage of apathy, criticism, and claws in the general public.
I have learned one sure thing throughout my personal and professional life… Prayer is powerful. As the shock continues to subside, a solid, planned, longterm strategy will unfold. Most likely after the holidays, early into next year. My current understanding is that Erika’s focus will be leading primarily the women of TPUSA… which is, more or less, in line with the “born again” evangelistic view of Christianity. With that said, it is possible that a handful of select young men will slowly emerge as obvious role models for the organization as a whole… thus, avoiding the constant 1:1 comparison to Charlie.
No, there will never be another quite like Charlie Kirk.
…and yet, it’s not over. God has a plan…
Doesn't matter who they get, CK was it. I don't follow TPUSA or his channel because I have a very unsettling gut feeling about TPUSA now that CK is gone.
Hey John, the really good videos exposing the fake Kirk shooting are coming out now. Here's of the the best yet:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYg6hC4gYlM
And more will come out, just like they did with the fake AF Trump shooting.
https://old.bitchute.com/video/XyQfYhZO9mLT/
Charlie Kirk psyop in 3 minutes:
https://www.winterwatch.net/2025/10/the-charlie-kirk-psyop-in-3-minutes
And it turns out that Charlie is not who he's portrayed to be. Have you read Miles Mathis's deep dive into Charlie Kirk's fabricated bio?
https://mileswmathis.com/kirk.pdf
That's right, Proberta. I have been surprised by the number of commentators on "the freedom side" who have accepted Charlie's "assassination" as real. It was a classic Freemasonic/Jesuit/Zionist ritual sacrifice mass trauma event by the numbers psy-op. Bit of a mouthful, but that describes it. Yes, the character "Charlie Kirk", after a decade playing his role, has been removed from their "world stage", but the actor who played him remains alive. As with the fake "Trump assassination attempt", no-one was killed. Who knows, the "CK actor" may reappear some time in the future, albeit in a different guise...after all he did a good job for his masters. As I say repeatedly, "We live in a world of deception".
"the number of commentators on "the freedom side" who have accepted Charlie's "assassination" as real"
Yep. Newbies..
But some have been around for a while, and should know better, e.g. CJ Bjerknes.
Its so disheartening to see how many comentators fell for the Kirk shooting. Especially so soon after the fake AF Trump shooting.
But they're commentators, not Conspiracy Theorists.
So either they're Newbies who haven't been exposed to False F1ags and Crysis Actors (or haven't watched 'Wag The Dog'! ;), and they probably still believe Al Queda took down the World Trade Center.
Or they're a Cabal plant.
💯true.So refreshing seeing some one else here got it.CK is a CIA psyop , mos def not dead.It's all circus for our gullible eyes.NO ONE gets into that high a position w/o being one of them.Thank you !
How about this instead? Charlie was a lifetime actor installed as the head of project TPUSA as a Zionist/NeoCon organization that was to keep ConInc at the forefront of young people. He has no backstory whatsoever, he's a college dropout who instantly gets millions of startup money from big Jewish donors, to start a debating club, basically. I'd argue that he wasn't actually all that influential from an organic perspective. Later his script changes to that of a "family" man. They assign another lifetime actor, Erika, who has VERY dubious ties, to play his wife. They give him some kids, which... can ANYONE provide a photo of their faces? These kids don't exist. I challenge anyone to give an explanation why there are zero facial pictures of these kids. Don't tell me they were THAT private. This is the modern age, someone, somewhere, would have uploaded a pic or two of this family. But no, they don't exist. Then the script calls for the big show!!!! Time to exit stage left (like literally he exited stage left) Now we have a 3 ring circus that rivals that of a president or king. Lifetime actor, Candace, is playing the Anti-Zionist fool. She's purposely stirring up the drama and at some point it's going to make her and her followers look like idiots. A lot like the "Flat Earth" project did. No matter how right you are on any subject, if you bought into flat earth you're tarred forever. Tucker is another one. He's basically a toned down and reasonable Alex Jones gatekeeping to keep people pacified and on the reservation. Meanwhile, ConInc is putting more surveillance, more rules, more laws, and more obstacles to real freedom than ever before all with the blessing of the masses who have been duped. That's my theory.
quite possibly, Ranch.
Please see this:
https://maxwellm.substack.com/p/jfk-a-doozie-on-62nd-anniversary
So, that's interesting. Here's a doozy to add to it. JFK wasn't assassinated. That was all theater and super fake. Just view the "autopsy" photos. Totally not JFK, not even close. There's a lot more to it of course. What's funny is how Lincoln and JFK had so many eerie coincidences in their life and death. Well, it turns out that Lincoln also faked his death. So yet again, we have the scriptwriters either intentionally mocking us or just lazy. AND JFK & Lincoln were both almost certainly gay. Lincoln had Joshua Speed and despite the "womanizing" of JFK, he had his best friend Lem Billings (openly gay) live at the white house. I think the womanizing was all a beard, as homosexuality wasn't exactly mainstream in the 60's.
For the record: I have no research background in Lincoln's death but I am confident that Kennedy died that day.
Lately it is discouraging to try to investigate 'reality,' since anyone can publish fictitious facts, and beautifully doctored photos, but that does not negate serious (and laborious) research.
You're so right. It is almost impossible at this point. The problem with research is source material. Take JFK's murder. How much of it is real? Eye witnesses are unreliable at best. "Official" government docs can be faked for sure. Did you know that there isn't a single photo of a civil war battle? Why is that? Because most of it was fake. Look at almost any photo pre-1900 and they're almost all doctored (photoshopped as it were) Just look at the skies. They've been erased. Not theory, actually been cut out and brushed over. Officially they say it was to erase the power lines and give the photos a cleaner look. That's fine, but it proves they had the ability to doctor photo's from the very start. Most WW2 photo's are all doctored. Once you see the pattern, you can't unsee it. Which goes back to investigation. How do we prove anything? Well I can tell you, that in a murder, you have to prove there was a person killed. For Charlie Kirk, that totally hasn't been done. We have zero evidence of his murder, because we don't have any proof. Not even a basic autopsy. We have some government statements that are vague. At least with JFK we had an autopsy. Autopsies used to be public domain, and they released his. I encourage you to view the autopsy photos of JFK. There's a resemblance, but key critical ear, face, and bone structures just don't change like that. It can not be the same person. There is absolutely so much more to the story that begins with his father. As an example, take his older brother, Joe Jr. That's the most ridiculous story ever. It doesn't even begin to make sense. These people are life time American nobility. There's not a chance his first born son would take on a stupid mission like that. As for the "real" son... who knows? i wouldn't doubt it. There are so many levels of fakery that are actually really easy to perpetrate on the masses. It doesn't take many people in fact to pull these off. Even something so stupid as the moon landing, wouldn't have required more than 30 people in the know. The Charlie Kirk event would have required probably about the same given that we are so much more media saturated now. But JFK could easily wanted out of the spotlight, to retire to Kenebunkport and live out the few years he had left in peace and quiet. Remember, he wasn't well at all. Same with Lincoln. They had little time left, so exit stage left, cause a political firestorm and get the masses all stirred up. Lot's of psychological warfare reasons not to mention the political. In the end, it's a lot easier to fake a murder than pull one off.
Everything is fake and gay.
💯 true.Came here to comment pretty much the same but got discouraged by all those comments crying about poor Charlie and "wife" Erika .They're all controlled opposition :Charlie, Erika, Candace, Tucker, Alex Jones, Joe Rogan, etc.Just CIA/Mossad psyops.The real opposition gets suicided fast.People still dont get it that's why all those ops work so well on us , dividing us left & right,keeping us busy fighting each other.So so sad !
I value other’s opinions and consider myself quite open-minded but… “100% true theory?”That’s an oxymoron. It’s not really even a theory based on the definition “well-substantiated explanations that connect and explain a collection of facts, laws, and tested hypotheses”.
It’s a conspiracy theory by definition. And I don’t mean this negatively… many conspiracy theories have been proven over time, no doubt.
I'm sorry if i offended you, Michelle.My reply was to Ranch comment, not yours.I try to avoid engaging w/ people affected by cognitive dissonance as i find it useless.And the "theory" was just a typo , rushing to formulate an articulate response.🤷🏻♀️
"I try to avoid engaging w/people affected by cognitive dissonance"
;)
He’s been on live TV with his kids…
Regardless, many well-known people work very hard to keep their children out of the spotlight.
Sure they do but they always FAIL in the ubiquitous smartphone age. So you have seen their faces? Do you know what show or event it was at? Because it will have a record of it somewhere and most probably can be retrieved. Google's AI said there are none on the internet. That's weird.
Can’t canswer that. However, I respectfully disagree with the premise that “they (famous people) ALWAYS fail.” Charlie and his daughter were on Fox and Friends.with that said, their family lives 6.2 miles from my home in Phoenix and I have seen them in public together.
First off, you write really well. Second, i'm a Miles Mathis student, so none of this is original to me per se. These things just seem to follow the same scripts over and over. It's as if the creative talent at Langley or Mossad isn't quite up to the task anymore so they keep recycling the same old stories. Third, I like to spread the "Fake and Gay" message as much as possible, not to black pill people as much as to let us realize it's all just theater. Sure there are definitely real world consequences, but there are regardless of whether we know it or not. Also, it detracts from getting worked up over any news of the day and also keeps you grounded knowing that there's really not much to be done about it. Personally, I don't think we plebs get much say in life other than a small circle of influence. Seems you're part of the ruling class or you're not. I've come to the conclusion that almost no one in the US breaks out of their class. Not in the last 100 years at least. Probably much much longer. So as a proud member of the slave class, I just enjoy the show and let others know as well. Sadly, the masses have almost zero influence on our rulers. I think they stage these plays as part of a strange alchemical ritual in order to cause chaos and misery. Maybe it's a type of spiritual food for these devils. My only question right now is why are THE Jews (as opposed to all Jews) allowing such a radical change in the script. I don't believe people like Tucker or Candace and many more are organic. The biggest narrative from the CK debacle is that he was "Noticing" how the Jews are behaving. So if it's all theater, then that's part of it which is kinda counter intuitive if you're THE Jews. I'm leaning that they are trying to separate and divide the "antisemites" from the rest. Maybe to later corral them into a dead end, or even possibly to a worse end. It's not like THE Jews really care about public opinion to be honest. They've been shitlords for the last 80 years and it hasn't stopped them one bit. They have power. They have money. Not much you can't do with those two. But it is a fascinating twist. We'll see how it plays out I guess.
I have no idea. I suck at predicting anything, lol. I thought I could read the tea leaves for a while, but after Covid, everything has gone down the Wonderland rabbit hole. Nothing makes any sense by comparing it to past events. Logic and reason seem useless. I mean, why is fuel so cheap yet cooking oil is 5x's the price?
Charlie Kirk, after being shot, held onto his microphone for a couple of seconds until just before the camera panned away…
AI response to my question, "Could a person who'd been shot through the neck continue to grip an object?"
A person shot in the neck would likely lose the ability to hold any object in their hand immediately. The injury typically causes rapid loss of consciousness due to massive blood loss, damage to the spinal cord, or disruption of blood flow to the brain, leading to the body going limp. The severe trauma, including potential damage to the spinal cord which controls signals from the brain to the body, would result in an immediate loss of muscle control and posture.
The neck contains vital structures like the carotid arteries and the spinal cord. A gunshot wound can cause catastrophic blood loss from major vessels, leading to hypovolemic shock and rapid unconsciousness.
Damage to the spinal cord in the neck can sever the connection between the brain and the body, causing paralysis and an immediate loss of the ability to maintain posture or grip objects.
The intense pain and shock from the injury, combined with the sudden drop in blood pressure and oxygen to the brain, would prevent any conscious effort to hold onto an object.
Even if the person remained conscious for a brief moment, the physical trauma and neurological damage would make it impossible to maintain a grip.
AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.
If he held onto the microphone, he was playing a role - and very badly - before being carted off, never to be seen again, allowing for the crime scene to be conveniently contaminated and paved over.
Classic decorticate posture—that is, an abnormal body posture characterized by flexion of the upper limbs—caused by severe trauma to the central nervous system.
But the 'dead or dying' man didn't drop the mic, was my point.
Not to mention that if Charlie had been shot with a 30.6 gun it would have blown half his neck away!
And oh look, its an exit wound.
IN THE FRONT?!??
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYg6hC4gYlM
Spin! It was a political assassination! No lone gunman!
My answers to your questions are all yes, and the Piper's main tune was Christian Zionism, until it wasn't.
The answers to your 4 questions are: yes, yes, yes, and Erika Kirk.
The answers to your questions are yes, yes, yes, and Mikey McCoy
Arrest Zuckerberg
Arrest Jeff Besos
Arrest Elon Musk
Arrest Fauchi..
Charlie Kirk (RIP) was building a base for his presidential campaign, and this was how he was doing it.
Lebo Von Lo~Debar
Former/Always 82nd Airborne Infantryman, Disabled Veteran for Life, & Author of the book, "The Separation of Corporation and State" subtitled "Common Sense and the Two-Party Crisis" Available on Amazon.
https://a.co/d/fy5rSdW
"As Jordan Peterson pointed out in an interview with Charlie Kirk a few months before Kirk’s death, about 4% of every society is composed of “predatory parasites.”
THAT'S rich, coming from Peterson!
Because he IS one of those 'PREDATORY PARASITES'!
BOUGHT and PAID FOR, by........Iz-ra-HELL!!
LITMUS TEST: If one is NOT, and JUSTIFIABLY so, trashing Iz-ra-HELL and Zionism/Zionists......they ARE 'ONE OF THEM'. (a SATANIST!)
Do you think JP might have had a moral compass and the inner conflict was a source of recent illness? Just a speculation.
Those who sell their Soul to Satan, have NO Moral Compass!
Yes, I think Peterson was reined in a few years ago the same way they were trying to rein in Kirk.
hi, txs for comment, my point is only What exactly makes him suspicious, I dont need accused, just what
txs
John, please explain what you are aiming at: who what where when and why. The why is partially understood, but what makes you make this claim of suspicion?
For now at least, a lot remains to be discovered. Perhaps John is encouraging readers to look into it themselves. Maybe he isn't ready to make any accusations, and rightfully so. There are many who have devoted a lot of effort to trying to figure this out who publish online.
To your questions, yes, yes, yes and yes!