46 Comments
User's avatar
Mr Ducky Two Feet's avatar

Vaccinating newborns is either profoundly evil or stupid. Newborns are protected for several weeks after birth by their mother's immune system through colostrum in the first breast feeding. This is important as newborns do not have a functioning adaptive immune system until two to three weeks after birth. Immunizing a newborn only inflicts a dose of toxins euphemistically called antigens, adjuvants, preservatives, and manufacturing residuals.

Barbara Charis's avatar

Vaccines are all toxic. Our body was created to use nutrients in natural food to nourish our organs, glands and cells in order to provide energy and health. Lab-Created substances do not nourish the internal workings of the human body...They damage the organs, glands and cells. Lab-created products are designed to enrich the provider of these products. There has never been any real safety checks of these products. Check out the Flexner Report produced by the Carnegie Foundation in 1910, which eliminated any health modality, except the patented Petroleum-based drugs John D Rockefeller of Standard Oil had to sell. He had patented drugs to sell and got the curriculum of med schools changed to promote drugs. He worked along with the Carnegie Foundation in promoting drugs as the basis of Medicine. 2400 years ago, Hippocrates, the Father of Medicine prescribed natural food and following a healthy lifestyle in order to achieve cures. He said, "Let Food be Your Medicine; and Medicine be Your Food." Drugs and vaccines do not belong in the human body. They break down the organs, glands and the cells.

Cathleen Manny's avatar

Yep. Ruins a newborn’s immune system. Guess how much ‘they’ care.

albert venezio's avatar

Great rationale John! The less the government thinks for us (usually actually trying to damage or murder us) the better!

Mark Leone's avatar

Vaccinating newborns with no risk factor because there are people out there engaging in risky behavior is the same impulse that says take away guns from responsibly, law-abiding people because there are criminals out there.

Danny Huckabee's avatar

Anything to make money.

Nick Kottenstette's avatar

I think we are living in two worlds: 1. The fantasy world is that all studies show/ claim “safe and effective”.

2. The real world when doctors and researchers publish results contrary to the dogma lands one removed of research funding or stripped of their medical license.

Cathleen Manny's avatar

Never mind any studies- they’re all crap. It’s about $.

Nick Kottenstette's avatar

Yeah, I’m coming to that conclusion. Preordained marketing pieces.

Roisin Dubh's avatar

Yeah, their rationale is highly irrational in terms of risk: benefit ratio for the newborn, but highly rational to increase pharma profits.

mejbcart's avatar

what others think about the CDC panel HepB 'revolution'? Found this one this morning, by Latypova, worth sharing:

"Lies do not become the truth because you reduced lying by 2%. Thousands of children died from the poison you claim you invented, hundreds of thousands are permanently injured and millions of adults are dead and injured because of the shit you did for decades and continue doing, “Dr” Malone. You present this as a “revolution”? Yeah, this is positively Red October and storming of Reichstag simultaneously! A whole 10 victims were found. Wow. I am speechless. Talk about adding insult to injury followed by slap in the face of all victims. After you lied, lied, lied, lied for 5 years, you slowed down the stream of bullshit just a tiny bit, just enough to award yourself a medal…"

Birdingmom's avatar

The last sentence was the best. The rationale for injecting this into a newborn is criminal.

MrBlaat's avatar

So quite literally "give them to the babies who cannot resist because adults with a mind of their own won't have themselves injected with poison".

Cathleen Manny's avatar

The parents can refuse it.

MrBlaat's avatar

I only read this morning the direct story from a parent who was only told her daughter got the HepB vaccine AFTER the shot was already given, so your statement is patently untrue.

Cathleen Manny's avatar

I have also heard stories of that occurring (which is intentional and evil, IMO), and I don’t doubt it does happen. Unfortunately, parents must do advance planning, including getting their wishes on record, endlessly repeating their refusal at every doctor appointment, and arrival at hospital, including having another advocate (in addition to the busy birth mother), and never letting baby out of their sight.

DaughteroftheKing's avatar

Force the POWERLESS, VULNERABLE Newborns to bear the burden and risks = MALFEASANCE!

earl's avatar

Wow. Yes. In 1991 it was: let children bear the risk so adults can be promiscuous. In 2020/1 it was: let's ruin the lives of children with lockdowns and shots to protect grandpa/ma.

Cathleen Manny's avatar

The parents need to say no. I know many who have done so. This is the ONE AND ONLY way to stop it. Remove the customer base.

DaughteroftheKing's avatar

Cathleen Manny - MOST parents are ignorant of the TRUTHS regarding the risks:benefits of the CDC'S Childhood Vaccine Schedule and TRUST their Child's pediatrician to guide them. I was one of those IGNORANT parents.

I believe the best way to stop this EVIL is to "rescind The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 (42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 300aa-34) and restore product liability to the vaccine manufacturers"..while we continue to work to educate parents.

Cathleen Manny's avatar

I completely agree with all you say. Yes, the PREP Act absolutely must be abolished, as it is indeed one of the major roots of this problem. Also, direct marketing of pharmaceuticals must be banned…this way, the mass media, which sadly is the source of information for most folks, would become less corrupt and more information would get out. There is absolutely no excuse for these things not being done, amd there is only one reason they haven’t been done.

DaughteroftheKing's avatar

Cathleen Manny - EXCELLENT points!

Cathleen Manny's avatar

Thanks. If only more folks would understand this. I feel as if, here on Substack, we keep preaching to the choir.

DaughteroftheKing's avatar

Cathleen Manny - I believe by sharing on Substack, we are helping more people be aware and understand about the COVID-19 shot injuries/deaths AND the CDC'S Childhood Vaccine Schedule injuries/deaths.

I learn from Substack posts DAILY and was just sharing information/data with a Friend today. Substack posts helped me provide evidence for her to consider. I have shared little bits of evidence with her over the past few years and she now listens intently and thoughtfully.

PKK's avatar

So according to the prevalence stated in the article: in 1991 there were about .004960 people living with hep B (estimated number of infected divided by the estimated population). Now there are about .005797 people with hep B (using the upper 2,000,000 estimate of infected people divided by the estimated population).

That doesn't seem like improvement.

David Kukkee's avatar

IF ALL FEDERAL EMPLOYEES TOOK "THE JAB" , (big if), then none of them are actually capable of being trusted with critical decision making. Their brains are infected with spike protein, and they cannot be trusted to think clearly. It is apparent to me that no federal employee, or anyone who is "jabbed" should be telling parents to have their child injected with foreign protein and leftover aborted fetus cells, rotted monkey kidney, feces, and an odd assortment of toxic metals. What kind of monster does that to a baby?

Peter Daniel Miller's avatar

The rationale for vaccinating babies against sexually transmitted diseases is the same as for universal screening at airports. Security officials don’t want to offend sexually promiscuous moms by asking them to take a test. Officials would probably be branded as ‘racist’ for doing so. Same for airport screening — officials fear being branded ‘islamophobic’. So everybody gets delayed by universal screening, and all babies get stuck with needles unnecessarily. It is all part of the same philosophy of universal criminalization, for the convenience and virtue-signaling of officials supposedly serving the public.

Mark Manno's avatar

There is no rational or scientific justification for the original schedule. However, the total liability shield put in place in 1986 basically gave pharma cart blanche to do whatever would give them the most profit, and babies are in no position to fight back.

Chris Gorman's avatar

What a profoundly evil medical care complex rules this country. Predatory, dismissive, arrogant, stupid, logically incapable, loud, crude, preening, hubristic, corrupted, fallacy laden.

Tom-from-Canada's avatar

In Canada, it's optional for over 16y

Cathleen Manny's avatar

Virtually any injection is optional, everywhere. Most people just don’t realize they can refuse.