You'd think we'd hear. BUT, this may be different, since he really wasn't shooting at the kids and teachers at a school he'd attended. This may have been more something tied in with "political" groups, so SSRIs may not matter. This could be very interesting to know--whether kids on SSRI's tend to stick to school/past events/past places that they relate to experiencing as youth.
I’m reading it as an assumption, at best, regarding: “You'd think we'd hear.” .
My reply: In a perfect world, yes; in the imperfect world, ‘not so fast!’
This whole incident has more holes than the Swiss cheese in my fridge.
SSRIs? Nasty stuff. Consider (you might already be at this point), the person on an SSRI loses contact with reality, instead living in an altered reality.
During the journey, the person (patient) loses the ability to either distinguish or differentiate the actions of the drug vs the world where they live. Reality testing goes out the window.
Side effects include thoughts of homicide/suicide. Thoughts progress to action…the patient(s) loses the ability to perceive what is occurring in their thought process. This opens more doorways to aberrant behaviour.
Is all this harboring potential violent behaviour? IMO yes, and the person (patient) in the altered mental status induced by the SSRI cannot take the appropriate measures to reverse the process.
“This could be very interesting to know--whether kids on SSRI's tend to stick to school/past events/past places that they relate to experiencing as youth.”
The main side affects of anti depressants are not homicide and suicide. Some medications will strengthen homicidal and suicidal urges, but it's case by case. The medicine that helps one person can hurt another.
Those Big Pharma commercials *always* include “possible thoughts of suicide” in the side effect warnings. They should be required by law to include “thoughts of homicide.” It’s becoming obvious.
Please look up the difference between correlation and causation. Also homicide is absolutely not one of the “main side effects” of any anti-depressant.
Except that if the shooter is familiar with the weapon, he can adjust his position--for example, by placing a folded towel between the stock and his shoulder.
It was mentioned and that the scope was not mounted incorrectly for its type either. I quote: “Short Mag” scope. The slightly unusual back mounting—necessitated on this rifle because of the scope’s short length—would NOT necessarily affect the shooting performance, depending on shooter’s style."
1. The Brown Shirt Man Is Just Casually Standing Behind The Barrier In Front Of Charlie...With His Left Arm Straight Out And Laying On The Top Horizontal Bar Of The People Barrier. He Is Watching Charlie And Not The Crowd Behind. A Security Team Member Would never Turn His Back To The People Behind Him Which He Is Supposed To Be Surveilling. He Is Partially Turned To His Right And Is Not Facing Charlie Straight On. This Is To Better Cover What Is About To Happen.
2. The Brown Shirt Killer Then Brings His Right Hand Forward With The Palm Pistol In Position. He Moves His Hand To Below And In Front Of His Left Shoulder And Just Behind His Bicep.
3. The Tiny Barrel Is Just Barely Visible In A Shadow Between His Two Middle Fingers. You Can See The Opening.
4. He Quickly Aims And Fires The Deadly Round Without Any Hesitation. He Is Actually SMILING While He Kills Charlie.
5. Immediately After The Shot, He Pulls His Right Hand Down And Back From His Firing Position...And Just Puts The Little Gun Back In His Right Side Pocket.
6. In One Fluid Move, He Brings His Now Empty Right Hand Forward And Places It On The Top Of The Barrier. Then, With Both Hands, He Vaults Right Over The Barrier To ‘Help' Carry Charlie To The SUV Out Back. This Assures The Brown Shirt Man’s Escape In The SUV...Which Also Permits Him To Search For The Bullet.
7. Remember, There Is No Paramedic EMT Ambulance On Site. That Alone Is One Of Many Outrageous Parts Of The Sophisticated, Brutal Plot To Kill Charlie Kirk.
my impression is the guy is pulling up his right hand and adjusting his shirt.
What you believe is a barrel sticking out is simply his middle finger / knuckle bent away from those surrounding it.
I see no evidence he had a strap around that hand to secure the "palm gun".
Have you ever shot a hand gun? Very hard to hit the side of a barn door with one that has enough fire power to blowup someone's neck-- 357 or 40.
Finally, if you look at the angle of his arm it points way off to the right side of Charlie Kirk. Any ability to hold the gun close to the palm would result in a bullet aiming in that direction, no where near CK.
I saw zero reaction to a possible handgun recoil in the guys hand and forearm.
I find it very hard to believe a palm-sized hand gun would have the power to blow apart someone's neck and kill.
I saw zero reaction to bystanders being surprised by the palm handgun firing noise. (Even a 22 long rifle makes a lot of noise and anyone standing near him would have jumped.)
I saw zero exhaust gases coming from his right hand fingers.
He moved his hand fluidly up to adjust his shirt and back down in one continuous motion without stopping to aim and fire.
Last but not least: I heard only an odd squish sound upon apparent impact but no high powered rifle sound. A 30-06 is VERY loud. I don't want to watch that horrible video one more time to hear it if it IS there.
So, we just ignore his confession, his texts with his boyfriend and other comments to people in his weirdo chat group? I think I’ll wait for the autopsy and the medical examiner’s report, as well as all the rest of the forensic evidence to be analyzed before concluding anything. He’d have taken an enormous risk of being convicted. This theory just doesn’t hold water, IMHO.
That is the pasty furry psy-ops smokescreen. Remember his neighbors reported out of state cars at Tyler's house. My theory is one of the intelligent agents handed him rifle cartridges and told him they were advanced bullets and to use them. The bullets were actually a high tech blanks.
So Tyler actually fired his rifle and actually believes he is the one who shot Mr. Kirk when it was really the professional a few feet away from Mr. Kirk. Tyler has been tricked into thinking he killed Mr. Kirk and will confess. Case closed. The plan was put together by the intelligence agency and AI. The only thing they could not control were the cell phones and the internet.
Jeff Reese came up with the answer. I always thought the big guy in front did not match your normal student population when I saw early videos on the first day.
FBI says the gun retrieved was a "Mauser 98 30-06 bolt action rifle" found in woods wrapped in a blanket. Image released to the media is of a Remington 700 with a synthetic stock—NOT a Mauser.
What location was Glen Beck in? Up close or in the back? The MSM made a big deal about how Tyler our furry shooter did not attract notice at the school since he blended in with the crowd.
I have no idea. My point is that there were a lot of people there who didn’t look like college students. I don’t know why the MSM said that; not particularly relevant.
No, not all .30-06 rifles have Monte Carlo stocks. The .30-06 Springfield is a type of ammunition, and it can be chambered in a wide variety of rifles, which come with many different stock configurations. The Monte Carlo is just one specific type of stock design.
FBI is in deep Sh*t now. What will they Do ? Release Robinson with an apology and start looking for the real assassin, who's probably thousands of miles away now in a foreign country w/o extradition agreements with the USA... enjoying Life with a hefty bank account. ? Maybe he has plastic surgery and a new identity, so he's once again free to go anywhere... including the USA !?1?!?
This was a textbook inside job done by highly trained intelligence operators. The kid in custody is just another patsy in a long string of patsies. The real question is.... which country ordered the hit?
Private Jet That Took Off From Utah After Charlie Kirk Assassination Disappears Mid-Flight Sparking Suspicion
"Initially, X (Twitter) users expressed concern about the continued function of Provo Airport, which is a 15-minute drive away from the UVU campus, as the shooter could potentially use it to escape.
One of them, @stellarman22 wrote "A private jet under the tail number N888KG left Provo Airport an hour after the shooting... Suspiciously 30 mins into the flight it drops off of ADS-B illegally and reappears headed back to Provo approx. an hour later... Why did this plane turn off its radar? Where is the shooter?"
In Utah, the arrest of George Zinn, identified as an Ashkenazi Jew, ignites discussion due to the state's minuscule Jewish population.
Arrest Overview;
Authorities arrested Zinn following an incident where he allegedly screamed at police, urging them to arrest him for his involvement in a shooting that occurred during a Charlie Kirk event. His behavior raised eyebrows across the community.
Comments from forums highlight a mix of disbelief and suspicion surrounding Zinn's actions. One person noted, "His craziness helped the shooter get away," questioning Zinn's intentions. Another mentioned his history of political agitation, further complicating the narrative.
The pasty furry psy-ops is the smokescreen. Remember his neighbors reported out of state cars at Tyler's house. My theory is one of the intelligent agents handed him rifle cartridges and told him they were advanced bullets and to use them. The bullets were actually a high tech blanks.
So Tyler actually fired his rifle and actually believes he is the one who shot Mr. Kirk when it was really the professional a few feet away from Mr. Kirk. Tyler has been tricked into thinking he killed Mr. Kirk and will confess. Case closed.
The plan was put together by the intelligence agency and AI. The only thing they could not control were the cell phones and the internet.
Thank you. The report sounds louder than a .32 like a rifle shot. Also there are 2 or 3 pops close together. Possible bullet snap or multiple shooters? Listen carefully. Also, a .32 would not exit especially if hitting bone. Thoughts???
Tyler the pasty, may have fire blank shot thinking he was the sniper, he was just a pasty.
NYT & LA Times Reported Charlie Kirk Being Shot On Sept. 9th- The Day Before His Assassination! PLUS, Amazon Books Had “The Shooting Of Charlie Kirk” Posted 1 Day Before His Murder
The same long video you posted above is analyzed by John Cullen and a guest expert. It is long and drawn out the way Cullen’s stuff tends to be, so the upshot is that this footage if analyzed with special equipment reveals that there were four drones in the area and that just before the shooting the Internet glitches
Re the drones: We don’t see the drone locations before, but we do see them rapidly leaving within seconds of the shooting, one close by the roof location. The speed is remarkable in the last two, and both could have been prepositioned on ledges or the like with payloads.
Kirk employed his own security i’m led to believe, he wasn’t at government level security detail right?
If BSman was employed by the campus, he still got a name and number. Bsman jumping the fence to assist means he’s identifiable. I mean, if he had just skulked-off then yes, he looks somewhat guilty in the vid.
I real time it was fast...In One Fluid Move, He brings his now empty right hand forward and places it on the top of the Barrier. Then, with both hands, He vaults right over the Barrier to ‘Help' carry Charlie to the SUV out Back...Remember, There was no Paramedic EMT Ambulance on Site.
For any reader unfamiliar with crime scenes and crime scene management, the crime scene is a deteriorating piece of evidence. As such, preserving it for as long as both possible and necessary is one of the goals/objectives. Not contaminating it is another goal/objective.
The palm gun is a .32. A .32 is not going to cause that much trauma. It just won't. Brown shirt guy looks to be scratching his arm and looks startled and surprised after the shot.
Webb is convincing here--entry wound below right ear, exit would in left front throat. He wasn't so good the other day with a piece about what seems to have been an unrelated Robinson (i.e., not Tyler's father) as a Spec Op in Ukraine. And with countless videos out there, can't expect John to have seen them all.
ENOUGH! The holocaust of the 21st century is being livestreamed with hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians, tens of thousands of INFANTS & CHILDREN being literally shredded to pieces in Israel's genocide of the Palestinian people - wiping an entire people off the face of the earth while you and others are obsessed with the murder of one controversial individual. Jesus christ, wake up! Where is your conscience?!
Sadly, lost in the chaos of fake news psy-ops....chaos, confusion, & cognitive dissonance desired goals....all distractions from advancing forces of technocracy & transhumanism....
Exactly. What's happening to the Palestinians is the harbinger of what's ahead for all of us. It's now just naked barbarism & savagery. International law, the US Constitution, the Geneva Conventions, and any sense whatsoever of morality & ethics have been obliterated. The Covid scamdemic just completely ripped off "the mask" of the ruling class. A military operation of democide via the bioweapon of mRNA injection - the ultimate WMD.
Thank you Bill. I was familiar with Event 201 but not with Crimson Contagion. I see that it was another simulation, gearing up for the "Big Kahuna" of the Covid scamdemic. An invaluable source of information is James Corbett of corbettreport.com.
It's unfortunate that the former battlefield surgeon did not comment on the blood volume, color, and lack of pulsatile action, and the lack of blood behind him and on the way to carrying him to the vehicle. Perhaps you could follow up with these questions?
The one video I saw did appear to have pulsatile action, along with significant volume.
Color: what I saw in the video was too dark for an oxygenated arterial bleed.
It could be the lighting, or not.
I've looked at a number of stills photographed after the event, no evidence of exit wound pattern on the apparently white tent.
The video I saw of the carry to the vehicle was too short to form an opinion, except this was the likely the best choice though futile as the time from such an open wound to surgery is 3 minutes maximum per a study (approximately 150 cases included) from Ben Taub Hospital in ?? late 1980's early 1990's)
The decorticate posturing noted is evident in the video I saw.
However, a lingering question I have is, in the fraction of a second immediately as the projectile impacts, was there cognition and the initial movement was spontaneous reaction? Without a citation handy, the period of cognition following guillotine (as during the French Revolution) was estimated to be as long as 7 seconds.
There are more questions than answers.
I extend a 'thank you' to John Leake for initiating this avenue of inquiry.
• Assassin runs across roof in full view, but where is their video footage of his arrival on said roof and assembling his weapon on a roof in full view?
• Runs and leaves roof carrying a WW 2 type Mauser bolt action rifle in a bag barely big enough for an assault rifle?
• Drops down 12 feet off roof onto grass, picks up bag and runs away towards open space.
• At some early stage, sticks the 36+ inch 5 kg rifle down his pants, causing a marked limp as he walks towards the compound?
• Later on he leaves the rifle he seemed keen to keep, and leaves it in a wooded area, fully assembled and empty case in breach?
• He is picked up up on CCTV cameras that can identify his shoes, T shirt and cap but not his face?
• All this with a none collapsing WW 2 weapon weighing near to 5 kg, that would take several minutes to assemble?
• After days police find a screwdriver used in the assembly of rifle in full view of the video camera?
• The disassembly and assembly of the rifle and scope would have significantly affected accuracy, NO DOUBT?
• They have video and photos of the firing position and indents in gravel, but none of the actual shot?
• Many expert commentators point out the Minutes Of Angle in the official reports do not match other ballistic evidence or what appears to be an EXIT wound on the left side of his neck?
• One camera catches what could be a muzzle flash from a window behind and to Charlie's right side?
• At least two clothing changes on route?
• I don't think this young man will see the inside of a court room, much like Lee Harvey Oswald, Jack Ruby and Epstein??
!I DON'T THINK SO! to many questions remain unanswered
Sergeant Instructor Army Physical Training Corps, Royal Army Medical Corps 1970 to 1990
he jumped off the roof holding his backpack only and with left hand holding on to roof to control his fall. I saw no 10# gun, nor did he have one as he walked away. . . How did the rifle arrive in the woods in a blankie?!
Without the REAL medical examiners analysis and expert ballistic testimony we will never know. Gotta' know the route through and where it entered. Need to see blood splatter images. How about GSR on the roof gravel? GSR on lots of stuff? Is the barrel even dirty? Where did he test fire this and learn to assemble and disassemble quickly enough? TIme line for the whole scene?
muzzle flash? who knows. . . it could be anything on a digital image.
Who was panning the CCTV cameras as he continued his escape up the road? If it was automatic then why did it focus on him alone, if it was manual why wasn't a warning given when someone first appeared on the roof. I agree not enough information and that is my point, the answers remain contrived or ambiguous?
1. you can see stock silhouette briefly when he climbs off roof.
2. he picks up his pack first then bends to pick up rifle after he hits the ground.
3. you would not use screwdriver to set up scope. You would use kentucky windage.
4. if you take receiver off stock, trigger group parts will stay put w/ tape or no tape if fit is tight
5. he practiced (fbi report targets found). may have checked zero pulling off scope and then reassembly. Also with bolt action, easy to boresight to get on target by removing bolt and looking through barrel. Use crap in bag to steady. That method would give u ~ 5 inches low at that range.
6. wanted to get rifle since it was his grandpa's, his dad gave it to him. Dad recognized rifle then realized it was his kid (per FBI)
7. Scope is way too rearward for 'pro' setup. But it can be done. Use right hand for fire control, left hand on rear of stock to control recoil and also effect elevation. Front end of rifle on backpack.
One of the things that I find really odd…I hunt with a 30-06 and if I shoot, people from half mile away will ask what did I shoot. My point is..in several eye witness videos, people keep saying they heard what sounds like a single firecracker. There is no mistake of a gunshot when a 30-06 is fired.
At least you spoke to an expert. The internet was deluged with people who claimed this shot required a “trained sniper”. People who have never even seen a rifle let alone fired one. A shot from that range from a prone position is one my 12 year old daughter makes with ease. Anyone can learn to hit a 4” target from 200 yards with a scoped rifle that’s correctly zeroed. A few hours of YouTube videos and a few hours at a range is plenty.
Good information John. And the shooter is usually on anti-depressants which main side-effects are homicide and suicide.
I wonder if Tyler was taking SSRIs.
Most likely. And probably his transgender partner also. I think they have a chip on their shoulder and feel picked on perhaps so they lash out....
You have identified and asked the 'elephant in the room' question appropriate to any of these events.
You'd think we'd hear. BUT, this may be different, since he really wasn't shooting at the kids and teachers at a school he'd attended. This may have been more something tied in with "political" groups, so SSRIs may not matter. This could be very interesting to know--whether kids on SSRI's tend to stick to school/past events/past places that they relate to experiencing as youth.
“You'd think we'd hear.”
I’m reading it as an assumption, at best, regarding: “You'd think we'd hear.” .
My reply: In a perfect world, yes; in the imperfect world, ‘not so fast!’
This whole incident has more holes than the Swiss cheese in my fridge.
SSRIs? Nasty stuff. Consider (you might already be at this point), the person on an SSRI loses contact with reality, instead living in an altered reality.
During the journey, the person (patient) loses the ability to either distinguish or differentiate the actions of the drug vs the world where they live. Reality testing goes out the window.
Side effects include thoughts of homicide/suicide. Thoughts progress to action…the patient(s) loses the ability to perceive what is occurring in their thought process. This opens more doorways to aberrant behaviour.
Is all this harboring potential violent behaviour? IMO yes, and the person (patient) in the altered mental status induced by the SSRI cannot take the appropriate measures to reverse the process.
“This could be very interesting to know--whether kids on SSRI's tend to stick to school/past events/past places that they relate to experiencing as youth.”
Why are kids on SSRIs?
This is a basic question.
Soma, ‘Brave New World’ Huxley, A (1932)
It is the opiate of the masses.
What makes SSRI ‘therapy’ any different?
They sure shouldn't be on them. We need a better solution to help these kids.
Most likely
Jennifer, ‘for the benefit of the uneducated’ would you translate? What are SSRIs? Thx!
The main side affects of anti depressants are not homicide and suicide. Some medications will strengthen homicidal and suicidal urges, but it's case by case. The medicine that helps one person can hurt another.
A woman in CO told my friend that the Columbine shooter was on SRI's Her son knew his mother.
Those Big Pharma commercials *always* include “possible thoughts of suicide” in the side effect warnings. They should be required by law to include “thoughts of homicide.” It’s becoming obvious.
Especially Prozac! Dr. Peter Breggin has done extensive research on this. Those drugs make you worse, not better.
Surely!
Please look up the difference between correlation and causation. Also homicide is absolutely not one of the “main side effects” of any anti-depressant.
Wrong!
Ouch! That sounds helpful… certainly applicable, sadly…
I’m a pharmacist and I’ve been screaming this for 20 years. Nobody listening yet…
Did you mention scope is mounted at the wrong location on the rifle to use? That's a biggie.
The scope is mounted too far back. Anyone firing this weapon would have a severe cut above the eye.
Scope location looks fine to me, scope ends right about where lower hand grip is, same location as my deer rifle.
'Scope eye'
There are currently more questions than answers .
It appears there are too many of you not reading the answers given. The scope position is explained in the article beneath which you are commenting .
No, it is not.
Well, I’m betting that Patel or Dan Bongino reassembled the rifle
Except that if the shooter is familiar with the weapon, he can adjust his position--for example, by placing a folded towel between the stock and his shoulder.
Irregular scope mounting was mentioned, but explained differently. please re-read carefully....
It was mentioned and that the scope was not mounted incorrectly for its type either. I quote: “Short Mag” scope. The slightly unusual back mounting—necessitated on this rifle because of the scope’s short length—would NOT necessarily affect the shooting performance, depending on shooter’s style."
Isolated Video Loop Of Brown Shirt Man Firing
Palm Pistol At Charlie Kirk - Any Doubts Now?
https://rense.com/general98/video-loop.php
-- Charlie Kirk Murder Weapon Revealed And How The Brown Shirt Man (Professional Assassin) Killed Him...
Here is the video for you to examine: Now you know why they took the camera from Mr. Kirk's tent within 5 minutes...it was pointing at the shooter.
*******************
https://rense.com/general98/31fcdec5-8f27-4688-a665-446ec6e3f5b5.mp4
********************
The crime scene was tampered with within five minutes of the shooting.
Two men caught TAMPERING with evidence after Charlie Kirk's shooting
Footage is here at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvtTIW_MDyY
How could the crime scene not be secured by the police immediately?
Full un-cut recording from today
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y10B2GUMiD0
Part 2:
Sequence Of Events...
1. The Brown Shirt Man Is Just Casually Standing Behind The Barrier In Front Of Charlie...With His Left Arm Straight Out And Laying On The Top Horizontal Bar Of The People Barrier. He Is Watching Charlie And Not The Crowd Behind. A Security Team Member Would never Turn His Back To The People Behind Him Which He Is Supposed To Be Surveilling. He Is Partially Turned To His Right And Is Not Facing Charlie Straight On. This Is To Better Cover What Is About To Happen.
2. The Brown Shirt Killer Then Brings His Right Hand Forward With The Palm Pistol In Position. He Moves His Hand To Below And In Front Of His Left Shoulder And Just Behind His Bicep.
3. The Tiny Barrel Is Just Barely Visible In A Shadow Between His Two Middle Fingers. You Can See The Opening.
4. He Quickly Aims And Fires The Deadly Round Without Any Hesitation. He Is Actually SMILING While He Kills Charlie.
5. Immediately After The Shot, He Pulls His Right Hand Down And Back From His Firing Position...And Just Puts The Little Gun Back In His Right Side Pocket.
6. In One Fluid Move, He Brings His Now Empty Right Hand Forward And Places It On The Top Of The Barrier. Then, With Both Hands, He Vaults Right Over The Barrier To ‘Help' Carry Charlie To The SUV Out Back. This Assures The Brown Shirt Man’s Escape In The SUV...Which Also Permits Him To Search For The Bullet.
7. Remember, There Is No Paramedic EMT Ambulance On Site. That Alone Is One Of Many Outrageous Parts Of The Sophisticated, Brutal Plot To Kill Charlie Kirk.
my impression is the guy is pulling up his right hand and adjusting his shirt.
What you believe is a barrel sticking out is simply his middle finger / knuckle bent away from those surrounding it.
I see no evidence he had a strap around that hand to secure the "palm gun".
Have you ever shot a hand gun? Very hard to hit the side of a barn door with one that has enough fire power to blowup someone's neck-- 357 or 40.
Finally, if you look at the angle of his arm it points way off to the right side of Charlie Kirk. Any ability to hold the gun close to the palm would result in a bullet aiming in that direction, no where near CK.
I saw zero reaction to a possible handgun recoil in the guys hand and forearm.
I find it very hard to believe a palm-sized hand gun would have the power to blow apart someone's neck and kill.
I saw zero reaction to bystanders being surprised by the palm handgun firing noise. (Even a 22 long rifle makes a lot of noise and anyone standing near him would have jumped.)
I saw zero exhaust gases coming from his right hand fingers.
He moved his hand fluidly up to adjust his shirt and back down in one continuous motion without stopping to aim and fire.
Last but not least: I heard only an odd squish sound upon apparent impact but no high powered rifle sound. A 30-06 is VERY loud. I don't want to watch that horrible video one more time to hear it if it IS there.
What’s with the blowing or puffed t-shirt?
Don't know but I did NOT see any blood exiting from the white shirt.
Also, it appears his head bows forward indicating the force came from the FRONT. No shot from the side explains this.
To me: All the evidence STILL points to Robinson being the agent, solely.
Amazing John... you've clearly nailed it ! Tyler is a decoy. Your footage makes it clear. A pro-hit no doubt. Sad. RIP Charlie...
So, Tyler confessed why, exactly?
He hasn't confessed yet!!
He did to his “roommate” and the other guys in their weird chat group.
He was paid handsomely ? Since there's no way he will ever be convicted, as the shooting data doesn't support his claim ?
So, we just ignore his confession, his texts with his boyfriend and other comments to people in his weirdo chat group? I think I’ll wait for the autopsy and the medical examiner’s report, as well as all the rest of the forensic evidence to be analyzed before concluding anything. He’d have taken an enormous risk of being convicted. This theory just doesn’t hold water, IMHO.
That is the pasty furry psy-ops smokescreen. Remember his neighbors reported out of state cars at Tyler's house. My theory is one of the intelligent agents handed him rifle cartridges and told him they were advanced bullets and to use them. The bullets were actually a high tech blanks.
So Tyler actually fired his rifle and actually believes he is the one who shot Mr. Kirk when it was really the professional a few feet away from Mr. Kirk. Tyler has been tricked into thinking he killed Mr. Kirk and will confess. Case closed. The plan was put together by the intelligence agency and AI. The only thing they could not control were the cell phones and the internet.
good idea...
Perhaps a red herring event.
Perhaps indeed ! What an F'ed up world we live in...
Jeff Reese came up with the answer. I always thought the big guy in front did not match your normal student population when I saw early videos on the first day.
FBI says the gun retrieved was a "Mauser 98 30-06 bolt action rifle" found in woods wrapped in a blanket. Image released to the media is of a Remington 700 with a synthetic stock—NOT a Mauser.
https://thumbs.worthpoint.com/zoom/images1/373/1014/21/gun-mauser-98-30-06-bolt-action-rifle_373_0e29ec42e3fd22ae46929b60117db49d.jpg
https://www.valiantshootingsports.com/assets/images/sku3110%20remington%20700%20adl/remington%20700%20adl%201.jpg
There were many people there who weren’t in “your normal student population”. Glenn Beck and his wife, for two.
What location was Glen Beck in? Up close or in the back? The MSM made a big deal about how Tyler our furry shooter did not attract notice at the school since he blended in with the crowd.
I have no idea. My point is that there were a lot of people there who didn’t look like college students. I don’t know why the MSM said that; not particularly relevant.
Do all 30.06's have Monte Carlo stocks?
No, not all .30-06 rifles have Monte Carlo stocks. The .30-06 Springfield is a type of ammunition, and it can be chambered in a wide variety of rifles, which come with many different stock configurations. The Monte Carlo is just one specific type of stock design.
FBI is in deep Sh*t now. What will they Do ? Release Robinson with an apology and start looking for the real assassin, who's probably thousands of miles away now in a foreign country w/o extradition agreements with the USA... enjoying Life with a hefty bank account. ? Maybe he has plastic surgery and a new identity, so he's once again free to go anywhere... including the USA !?1?!?
He confessed! And he is not cooperating…wouldn’t you be screaming to the heavens if you were unjustly accused of murder? This isn’t a movie...
This was a textbook inside job done by highly trained intelligence operators. The kid in custody is just another patsy in a long string of patsies. The real question is.... which country ordered the hit?
Private Jet That Took Off From Utah After Charlie Kirk Assassination Disappears Mid-Flight Sparking Suspicion
"Initially, X (Twitter) users expressed concern about the continued function of Provo Airport, which is a 15-minute drive away from the UVU campus, as the shooter could potentially use it to escape.
One of them, @stellarman22 wrote "A private jet under the tail number N888KG left Provo Airport an hour after the shooting... Suspiciously 30 mins into the flight it drops off of ADS-B illegally and reappears headed back to Provo approx. an hour later... Why did this plane turn off its radar? Where is the shooter?"
https://www.latintimes.com/private-jet-that-took-off-utah-after-charlie-kirk-assassination-disappears-mid-flight-sparking-589463
***************
In Utah, the arrest of George Zinn, identified as an Ashkenazi Jew, ignites discussion due to the state's minuscule Jewish population.
Arrest Overview;
Authorities arrested Zinn following an incident where he allegedly screamed at police, urging them to arrest him for his involvement in a shooting that occurred during a Charlie Kirk event. His behavior raised eyebrows across the community.
Comments from forums highlight a mix of disbelief and suspicion surrounding Zinn's actions. One person noted, "His craziness helped the shooter get away," questioning Zinn's intentions. Another mentioned his history of political agitation, further complicating the narrative.
https://mysterylores.com/news/mystery-surrounds-george-zinns-arrest-in-utah/
The Jet info is interesting. Is it an hour from Utah to Canada ?
I agree Tyler is not the shooter…the bullet came from Charlie’s left, not in front of him.
Potentially true!
The pasty furry psy-ops is the smokescreen. Remember his neighbors reported out of state cars at Tyler's house. My theory is one of the intelligent agents handed him rifle cartridges and told him they were advanced bullets and to use them. The bullets were actually a high tech blanks.
So Tyler actually fired his rifle and actually believes he is the one who shot Mr. Kirk when it was really the professional a few feet away from Mr. Kirk. Tyler has been tricked into thinking he killed Mr. Kirk and will confess. Case closed.
The plan was put together by the intelligence agency and AI. The only thing they could not control were the cell phones and the internet.
Thank you. The report sounds louder than a .32 like a rifle shot. Also there are 2 or 3 pops close together. Possible bullet snap or multiple shooters? Listen carefully. Also, a .32 would not exit especially if hitting bone. Thoughts???
Tyler the pasty, may have fire blank shot thinking he was the sniper, he was just a pasty.
NYT & LA Times Reported Charlie Kirk Being Shot On Sept. 9th- The Day Before His Assassination! PLUS, Amazon Books Had “The Shooting Of Charlie Kirk” Posted 1 Day Before His Murder
https://banned.video/watch?id=68c30d69bbd81cebcbdc766f
Anastasia J. Casey's The Shooting Of Charlie Kirk book gets published a day before Trump ally's killing. Full controversy explained
https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/world/anastasia-j-caseys-the-shooting-of-charlie-kirk-book-gets-published-a-day-before-trump-allys-killing-full-controversy-explained/ar-AA1MrGWR
Pasty too, but I think you meant patsy.
The same long video you posted above is analyzed by John Cullen and a guest expert. It is long and drawn out the way Cullen’s stuff tends to be, so the upshot is that this footage if analyzed with special equipment reveals that there were four drones in the area and that just before the shooting the Internet glitches
https://www.youtube.com/live/cRlx04HXYIM?si=fWYBRyv6zAm_PWwN
Re the drones: We don’t see the drone locations before, but we do see them rapidly leaving within seconds of the shooting, one close by the roof location. The speed is remarkable in the last two, and both could have been prepositioned on ledges or the like with payloads.
The shot sounded like a rifle though.
So what’s Brown Shirt guy’s name?
Kirk employed his own security i’m led to believe, he wasn’t at government level security detail right?
If BSman was employed by the campus, he still got a name and number. Bsman jumping the fence to assist means he’s identifiable. I mean, if he had just skulked-off then yes, he looks somewhat guilty in the vid.
Smoke n mirrors perhaps.
That doesn’t look too suspicious!
I real time it was fast...In One Fluid Move, He brings his now empty right hand forward and places it on the top of the Barrier. Then, with both hands, He vaults right over the Barrier to ‘Help' carry Charlie to the SUV out Back...Remember, There was no Paramedic EMT Ambulance on Site.
#Mossad
the way the CRIME SCENE was taken apart, really reminds 9/11, all the evidence, send out to China, in Charlies case, who knows who got the films...:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvtTIW_MDyY
You make a valid point with a valid analogy.
For any reader unfamiliar with crime scenes and crime scene management, the crime scene is a deteriorating piece of evidence. As such, preserving it for as long as both possible and necessary is one of the goals/objectives. Not contaminating it is another goal/objective.
Many questions, few answers.....
Hey John:Why haven't you taken a look at: https://georgewebb.substack.com/p/earshot-the-charlie-kirk-murder?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=674856&post_id=173756740&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=13rnq&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
The palm gun is a .32. A .32 is not going to cause that much trauma. It just won't. Brown shirt guy looks to be scratching his arm and looks startled and surprised after the shot.
This camera footage and crime site analysis supports George Webb's analysis in his article.
https://banned.video/watch?id=68c9dcc1a194caf87f82dc90
These are cell phone videos. The question to ask is can a bullet even been caught mid air by cell phone video.
Butler was different. CNN for some reason (I'm sure it was just a coincidence) had a high speed camera there that day.
Webb is convincing here--entry wound below right ear, exit would in left front throat. He wasn't so good the other day with a piece about what seems to have been an unrelated Robinson (i.e., not Tyler's father) as a Spec Op in Ukraine. And with countless videos out there, can't expect John to have seen them all.
ENOUGH! The holocaust of the 21st century is being livestreamed with hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians, tens of thousands of INFANTS & CHILDREN being literally shredded to pieces in Israel's genocide of the Palestinian people - wiping an entire people off the face of the earth while you and others are obsessed with the murder of one controversial individual. Jesus christ, wake up! Where is your conscience?!
Sadly, lost in the chaos of fake news psy-ops....chaos, confusion, & cognitive dissonance desired goals....all distractions from advancing forces of technocracy & transhumanism....
Exactly. What's happening to the Palestinians is the harbinger of what's ahead for all of us. It's now just naked barbarism & savagery. International law, the US Constitution, the Geneva Conventions, and any sense whatsoever of morality & ethics have been obliterated. The Covid scamdemic just completely ripped off "the mask" of the ruling class. A military operation of democide via the bioweapon of mRNA injection - the ultimate WMD.
Please get the #'s correct: "Covid1984"....*grin*
Bill, if you're not familiar with the definitive expose of the military op, do read Sasha Latypova & Debbie Lerman's "Covid Dossier." I'm still waiting for John to interview Sasha - what's he afraid of? https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/the-covid-dossier-updated-a-record?utm_source=publication-search
Also, "Operation Crimson Contagion", & "Event 201"....
Thank you Bill. I was familiar with Event 201 but not with Crimson Contagion. I see that it was another simulation, gearing up for the "Big Kahuna" of the Covid scamdemic. An invaluable source of information is James Corbett of corbettreport.com.
It's unfortunate that the former battlefield surgeon did not comment on the blood volume, color, and lack of pulsatile action, and the lack of blood behind him and on the way to carrying him to the vehicle. Perhaps you could follow up with these questions?
The one video I saw did appear to have pulsatile action, along with significant volume.
Color: what I saw in the video was too dark for an oxygenated arterial bleed.
It could be the lighting, or not.
I've looked at a number of stills photographed after the event, no evidence of exit wound pattern on the apparently white tent.
The video I saw of the carry to the vehicle was too short to form an opinion, except this was the likely the best choice though futile as the time from such an open wound to surgery is 3 minutes maximum per a study (approximately 150 cases included) from Ben Taub Hospital in ?? late 1980's early 1990's)
The decorticate posturing noted is evident in the video I saw.
However, a lingering question I have is, in the fraction of a second immediately as the projectile impacts, was there cognition and the initial movement was spontaneous reaction? Without a citation handy, the period of cognition following guillotine (as during the French Revolution) was estimated to be as long as 7 seconds.
There are more questions than answers.
I extend a 'thank you' to John Leake for initiating this avenue of inquiry.
Timeline of an assassin?
• Assassin runs across roof in full view, but where is their video footage of his arrival on said roof and assembling his weapon on a roof in full view?
• Runs and leaves roof carrying a WW 2 type Mauser bolt action rifle in a bag barely big enough for an assault rifle?
• Drops down 12 feet off roof onto grass, picks up bag and runs away towards open space.
• At some early stage, sticks the 36+ inch 5 kg rifle down his pants, causing a marked limp as he walks towards the compound?
• Later on he leaves the rifle he seemed keen to keep, and leaves it in a wooded area, fully assembled and empty case in breach?
• He is picked up up on CCTV cameras that can identify his shoes, T shirt and cap but not his face?
• All this with a none collapsing WW 2 weapon weighing near to 5 kg, that would take several minutes to assemble?
• After days police find a screwdriver used in the assembly of rifle in full view of the video camera?
• The disassembly and assembly of the rifle and scope would have significantly affected accuracy, NO DOUBT?
• They have video and photos of the firing position and indents in gravel, but none of the actual shot?
• Many expert commentators point out the Minutes Of Angle in the official reports do not match other ballistic evidence or what appears to be an EXIT wound on the left side of his neck?
• One camera catches what could be a muzzle flash from a window behind and to Charlie's right side?
• At least two clothing changes on route?
• I don't think this young man will see the inside of a court room, much like Lee Harvey Oswald, Jack Ruby and Epstein??
!I DON'T THINK SO! to many questions remain unanswered
Sergeant Instructor Army Physical Training Corps, Royal Army Medical Corps 1970 to 1990
he jumped off the roof holding his backpack only and with left hand holding on to roof to control his fall. I saw no 10# gun, nor did he have one as he walked away. . . How did the rifle arrive in the woods in a blankie?!
Without the REAL medical examiners analysis and expert ballistic testimony we will never know. Gotta' know the route through and where it entered. Need to see blood splatter images. How about GSR on the roof gravel? GSR on lots of stuff? Is the barrel even dirty? Where did he test fire this and learn to assemble and disassemble quickly enough? TIme line for the whole scene?
muzzle flash? who knows. . . it could be anything on a digital image.
Simply not enough info for rational analysis.
Who was panning the CCTV cameras as he continued his escape up the road? If it was automatic then why did it focus on him alone, if it was manual why wasn't a warning given when someone first appeared on the roof. I agree not enough information and that is my point, the answers remain contrived or ambiguous?
excellent points!
this thing is absolutely not cut and dry, regardless of what one "expert" claims
May he be safe. End of story. https://moniquelukens.substack.com/p/i-believed-til-i-didnt-the-disinformation
don't waste your time on this one.
1. you can see stock silhouette briefly when he climbs off roof.
2. he picks up his pack first then bends to pick up rifle after he hits the ground.
3. you would not use screwdriver to set up scope. You would use kentucky windage.
4. if you take receiver off stock, trigger group parts will stay put w/ tape or no tape if fit is tight
5. he practiced (fbi report targets found). may have checked zero pulling off scope and then reassembly. Also with bolt action, easy to boresight to get on target by removing bolt and looking through barrel. Use crap in bag to steady. That method would give u ~ 5 inches low at that range.
6. wanted to get rifle since it was his grandpa's, his dad gave it to him. Dad recognized rifle then realized it was his kid (per FBI)
7. Scope is way too rearward for 'pro' setup. But it can be done. Use right hand for fire control, left hand on rear of stock to control recoil and also effect elevation. Front end of rifle on backpack.
Please ask the military trauma surgeon what would normally be SEEN when a carotid artery is severed, and what is his analysis of that?
#CharlieKirk
https://x.com/harrisonhsmith/status/1967389264066564290?s=46&t=zqWNYNLiZiB92R8DfH7aGg
https://x.com/thegrayzonenews/status/1966556093879890052?s=46&t=zqWNYNLiZiB92R8DfH7aGg
https://youtu.be/ZC8RuK4lPBk?si=9R7y5GaJZNCNxqS1
https://x.com/partisangirl/status/1965904134676389970?s=46&t=zqWNYNLiZiB92R8DfH7aGg
https://youtube.com/shorts/HLIwVzzZ3X4?si=D88hK5D3YqCI8aLE
https://x.com/heirofascania/status/1968481877452284152?s=46&t=zqWNYNLiZiB92R8DfH7aGg
One of the things that I find really odd…I hunt with a 30-06 and if I shoot, people from half mile away will ask what did I shoot. My point is..in several eye witness videos, people keep saying they heard what sounds like a single firecracker. There is no mistake of a gunshot when a 30-06 is fired.
At least you spoke to an expert. The internet was deluged with people who claimed this shot required a “trained sniper”. People who have never even seen a rifle let alone fired one. A shot from that range from a prone position is one my 12 year old daughter makes with ease. Anyone can learn to hit a 4” target from 200 yards with a scoped rifle that’s correctly zeroed. A few hours of YouTube videos and a few hours at a range is plenty.