Then I wonder why the makers of Tylenol issued a precaution about taking Tylenol during pregnancy, well before any of the current warnings came out….????
Mum is told to use paracetamol if there is an inflammatory reaction to childhood vaccines.
The body's major antioxidant is glutathione that mops up inflammation. After childhood vaccines there is acute immune activation which depletes glutathione; similarly, the paracetamol depletes glutathione. Without enough glutathione the body gets extremely inflamed and cannot handle cellular stress.
The inflamed state of the brain is associated with neurological disorders; encephalitis is listed as a side-effect of most injections, and this will rage on if there is depleted glutathione. Brain inflammation can lead to SIDS nor ASD. They have not studied effects of giving several childhood injections in one go.
If one of the reasons women might need Tylenol during pregnancy is due to receiving a vaccination, WHY ARE WE VACCINATING THEM??? Could this also account for an upsurge in miscarriages?
Indeed....one would ask "why?"....but we all know the answer -- those who read this substack, anyway...
Dr. Mike Yeadon did opine on this point. "Your government wants you dead" and that includes your unborn "useless eaters"....So get over it.
Don't take their toxic "vaccines" don't support the complicit drug companies, don't believe their lies. Simple. Taking any unnecessary drug during pregnancy is manifestly insane.
But many of us are these days......the "vaccine" has added considerably to the burden of the very ill and that includes "insanity." The future does NOT look bright. It did look very bright a few years ago....but the criminal "elites" have since launched a full out attack on the rest of humanity. Remember what it said on the "guidestones"? 5OO,OOO is the optimum number for humans....And so "they" are working hard on this....Hold on to your hats...it is bound to get a lot worse...with rampant weather manipulation and all out war.
Much gratitude and thanks to Nicholas and Dr. McCullough for their courage and honesty in the face of universal deceit. I am 75. I have taken no drugs for decades. I am fine. I use food as my medicine and drink a variety of herbal teas. I suffered from rheumatoid arthritis a while back and was told it was "incurable"....that was a lie. Now I am quite limber and pain free. Most things that are "incurable" can be at the very least "mitigated."
As I understand the controversy, the childhood vaccinations CAUSE FEVERS. Mothers then, advised by their doctors, take TYLENOL, in hand, give it to the child, and harm the child by fighting a fever caused by the vaccines. I understand also that the depletion of glutathion is a mechanism of acetaminophen that causes further problems, such as reducing the ability of the immune system to fight the inflammation caused by the "vaccines". This is a prime example of PHARMA creating a problem (a market) and selling billions of dollars worth of drugs to "treat" the "problem" they intentionally caused. Dr. McCullough... please confirm the FACTS of this issue, specifically, that Tylenol is a greatly overused medication, often prescribed, with understated risks, ESPECIALLY regarding the genesis of AUTISM. THE TRUTH HAS NOT BEEN CLEARLY STATED YET. (While I an not a doctor, I see plainly that the truth cuts as cleanly as a surgeons scalpel). Depleting glutathion IS NOT a good idea. Treating simple, low grade fever with Tylenol is quite likely MOSTLY unnecessary... BUT, however, inducing fever by injecting babies with multiple doses of fecal/chemical/metallic/foreign protein poisons, and then concurrently depleting their glutathion with Tylenol is astoundingly perverse.
Good question, Allie. A full dissertation on the proper treatment of fever is in order. Generally, fever should not be treated... it is the bodies natural treatment for an infection, and should not be interfered with by pharma.
You’re correct about the body’s use of fever as a defense against infection. But too high fever can precipitate seizures and fetal loss. The question should be, when is fever too high when those risks cannot be managed by physical means.
Of course, Allie, that is the issue... doctors often do not tell mothers the necessary facts, and simple fevers are getting treated by mothers who care, but are without the necessary knowledge. I understand that a fever of 105 F is a medical emergency, whereas a fever of 104 F can be tolerated safely for a short time. 103 F and under should be left alone, and monitored. The real question, in my view is... why are babies being given useless, fever inducing vaccines. Babies do not need vaccines, and are currently being forced to take them, often against the will of the parents, and most often without the consent of parents. Pharma is killing babies. Stop the "vaccinations", and the problem disappears.
Yes...indeed...they "hate us for our freedoms"....and for being born. So we are harmed at every opportunity. Why do we need Tylenol anyway....when aspirin works great, was originally plant derived and does little harm? We are told it causes "ulcers"...does it really? I don't know. What do others think?
Hi Kathleen, I thought I would chime in, it's been a while. Aspirin reduces clotting, and thereby increases bleeding, if bleeding occurs for one of many reasons, while taking Aspirin. Surgeons need to know if a patient has been taking Aspirin for that reason. It is the same reason doctors (used to) recommend one 'baby aspirin a day for adults. (I don't think babies should be given Aspirin, personally). The cause of 'ulcers' is usually Helicobacter Pylori, sometimes found in raw milk. It is treated with a three combo of antibiotic. There may be other causes of ulcers, lesions related to cancers, for example, but Aspirin (Salicylic Acid) if abused, used in large amounts, or daily could likely cause 'ulcers' in people with weakened blood vessels. The use of Aspirin has diminished over time, as doctors realized they were mistaken... about safe and effective. Nothing new. NSAIDS are not safe and effective, having harmed many.
Thanks for taking the trouble to inform me. I rarely used aspirin for my children--but then I was very lucky in that they were vigorous and healthy. I never trusted Tylenol...just a gut feeling I had and still have. I think I read a study about Tylenol and liver damage...not sure on that. Well...there certainly are many drugs out there that are used extensively and some people need them desperately. My husband takes drugs that help for his neurological condition--valproac acid is one...been around a long time and helps him. Drugs have saved numerous lives ....including my own on occasion. My Dad suffered from ulcers and believe me, it never crossed his mind to have "raw milk"....What people choose to put into their mouths is a source of endless fascination and debate and may be less influential than the thoughts we habitually entertain. . I see your posts a lot here and you seem quite well informed. I have learned a lot from Dr. McCullough and author Nicolas Hulscher and am so grateful for their courage and devotion to the healing arts and to truthful information. Best KN
I think even the Romans knew it. Pregnant mothers should ingest nothing foreign into their bodies. No medicines if at all possible, And certainly no vaccines. Why are we not giving Aspirin another look? Reyes syndrome Came out of nowhere about the time all the other painkillers came on the market. We need to look hard at those studies again. Willow bark's been used forever.
I agree, but bleeding risk may still be a concern since aspirin and other NSAIDs impair platelet aggregation. That’s why aspirin is often given to someone having a heart attack caused by a clot blocking a coronary artery.
While I understand not wanting to take the focus off of “vaccines” during pregnancy as the cause for autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders, the cause of autism is multifactorial and complex, and, I think, that people may interpret the headline of this article to be “assured” that acetaminophen use during pregnancy is safe and no cause for concern. As I have written elsewhere on this Substack, there are nonpharmacologic methods for reducing fever and pain which should be employed, and acetaminophen should be used only when the risk to the fetus or child is high if those methods fail.
There is no doubt at all, in my mind, that Dr. McCullough is an outstanding, competent, honest, independent and courageous health practitioner, who has done so much to help mitigate a lot of the predicament we´ve found ourselves in for decades. And, from his posture in medicine, I have noticed that he is also a very open-minded person, willing to go the extra mile to accomodate new meaninful knowledge. This is why I would like to give my humble contribution in a bid to enrich this long overdue debate on the spiralling chronic diseases, not only in USA, but worldwide, with devastating consequences.
To start with, I would like to state, document and share the fact of common sense that if A can lead to B and B can lead to C, then A could inevitably lead to C. So, it seems totally reasonable and responsible to say: «if you don´t want to end up in C, do not take the route A, just because you may end up in C, which you definitely don´t want. If Tylenol can cause Glutathione deficiency (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15878691/) and Glutathione deficiency can cause neurodevelopmental disorders (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8229148/pdf/ijms-22-06171.pdf), then it should be a common sense to realize that Tylenol can cause brain damages, whatever you want to call it (ADHD, ADD, ASD, Encephalitis, etc., etc.).
It seems that the reason why conventional medical doctors prescribe Tylenol or other pain-killers so promptly, may have to do with the fact that they seem to have been trained not to undeerstand the root causes of pain (a language the body uses to tell us that something is not right), but yes, they seem to have been trained to just identify the symptoms and shut them off with anaesthetics or pain-killers, instead of trying to figure out what are the underlining factors contributing to the symptoms. It is just embarrassing. I feel sorry for those doctors, who have just been turned into little more than sales reps for Big Pharma. It looks obvious to me that if the Big Pharma wants to sell its drugs, it will not fund conventional medical schools to teach medical students how to cure diseases, unless it wants to go bankrupt.
The same thing goes for vaccines. If the vaccines are made safe and effective to prevent diseases or disease factors (viral, parasitic, bacterial or fungal infections), how is the Big Pharma going to sell its lucrative products and avoid bankrupcy? I have the impression that the majority of the conventional medical doctors have not yet understood this equasion, which is, in itself, pretty problematic. When conventional medical schools and doctors become independent again, they will teach and learn how to reduce and/or eliminate physical pain, in minutes or few hours, with adequate personalised mechanotransduction (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41392-023-01501-9), adequate personalised natural chelation (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3654245/) and, given that we´re the results of what we consume, personalised nutrition (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8224682/).
The fact that western medical instituitions approaches do not want and have not yet identified the definitive link and the exact mechanism of action of its procuct-induced diseases and neurodevelopmental disorders, is not prove that Tylenol, other drugs and vaccines are safe. Far from it. It is clear and understandable that the disease industrial complex has a desire to not find links between its products and diseases. It is clear that ill-intended procedures have been put in place to make it difficult to find links between pharmaceutical products and diseases. By the time competent, honest and independent doctors, scientists and experts manage to overcome the hurdles and establish definitive factors and links to real chronic diseases, billions of people will have been injured, and perished from the same chronic diseases. Pretty sad, indeed!
I forwarded further personal info to Dr. McCullough, so he will become aware of where I am coming from.
We, humans, are playing with fire, big time. President Trump and Secretary Kennedy are damn right. It seems that they still have and use common sense. And more, they did not come up with this stuff themselves. There is enough evidence that those analgesics are harming people, especially children and teenagers. Tylenol harms people directly and indirectly, alone or in combination, especially through pregnancy, causing brain damages and endocrine disruptions (gender dysphoria?). Call it whatever you like, but let´s stop this madness. We should be able to stop the psychopaths, infiltrated in medicine, from further injuring our kids. Why is it not happening yet?
It looks as if it will have to come from us, parents. We have to stop this, now. The so called health specialists seem to be too busy creating problems for their own survival and are unwilling to use common sense to understand the real world, where foreign substances entering human body are causing havoc.
We already have enough evidence to figure out that besides causing neurologic impairment in kids, acetaminophen, some other analgesics and agrotoxics are also causing endocrine disruptions, likely leading to gender dysphoria in children and teenagers and young adults. There is an explosion of kids and teens with gender confusion. It may be all part of the big agenda of depopulation, but enough is enough. Those responsible for all this mess are not only disregarding robust evidence, but are also doing nothing to prevent and solve chronic diseases and gender dysphoria plaguing our kids. They don´t only want to kill those alive, but also to prevent more from getting born.
We already have enough robust evidence to figure out that those pain-killers, glyphosate, atrazine and some other agrotoxics (and also chemtrails-a cocktail of dangerous chemicals and nanoparticles) are causing brain damages and endocrine disruptions and the resulting gender dysphoria, and the related forceful push for social inclusion of the victims. It looks as though it is all part of the depopulation agenda games.
When Big Pharma wants to protect their bottom line it pays for bogus studies and medical consensus. When the medical consensus is genuine and evidence-based, but is seen as a threat to Big Pharma´s profit, it pays to have the genuine consensus discredited. Who is going to stop this charade before it is too late?
Developed and strong countries should be doing much more to stop this madness. With our national leaders, military, authorities and health agencies behaving like we´ve seen, we will not need foreign enemies to come and destroy us. Our own leaders are doing that for them. They are handing us over on a tray to be slaughtered and exterminated by the enemies (including Big Pharma) within:
didn't read the whole thing...but liked this part "We should be able to stop the psychopaths, infiltrated in medicine, from further injuring our kids. Why is it not happening yet? It looks as if it will have to come from us, parents. We have to stop this, now. The so called health specialists seem to be too busy creating problems for their own survival and are unwilling to use common sense to understand the real world, where foreign substances entering human body are causing havoc."
Yeah...well THE BUCK ALWAYS DID STOP HERE. We are responsible and that means totally...for whatever goes into our mouths and those of our minor children. As long as we have at least that much controlled it should be rigorously exercised. If we neglect this obvious fact then it is our own fault. The more damage done to our bodies and immune systems...the more we "need" the so-called health professionals. If we are healthy then they make no money...so what does that tell us?
Here is the answer: their drug products are designed to harm us so we need "medical care".
This is what ACOG says, as quoted by Dr. McCullough: “In more than two decades of research on the use of acetaminophen in pregnancy, not a single reputable study has successfully concluded that the use of acetaminophen in any trimester of pregnancy causes neurodevelopmental disorders in children. In fact, the two highest-quality studies on this subject—one of which was published in JAMA last year—found no significant associations between use of acetaminophen during pregnancy and children’s risk of autism, ADHD, or intellectual disability."
The JAMA study that ACOG is referring to here is by Ahlqvist et al., 2024 (the "Swedish" study). Here is the problem with that study that found no harm from Tylenol.
A section on the "limitations" of the study says: "[E]xposure assessment was not perfect [meaning - knowing and documenting which mothers and babies took Tylenol, how much and for how long, was incomplete]. Antenatal [prenatal] data in the Medical Birth Register only recorded whether a birthing parent used acetaminophen, without regard to dose, duration, or timing. Prescription dispensation records might not reflect OTC [over-the-counter, nonprescription] use of acetaminophen. Thus, more specific aspects of exposure could not be assessed, and one cannot definitively exclude the possibility that use of acetaminophen beyond a certain dose at a critical point might pose some risk. This study’s finding that 7.49% of birthing parents used acetaminophen during pregnancy is lower than in some studies, but is concordant with other studies. Self-reported medication use is subject to underreporting of actual use. This study did not have data on conditions that did not require inpatient or outpatient medical care. Many indications for acetaminophen use, such as headache, infection, fever, and other pain, may not rise to a level that warrants seeking medical attention. Thus, capture of potential indications is incomplete."
If the woman was hospitalized and the doctor ordered Tylenol there would be pharmacy dispensing records to go by; if she had a doctor visit and was prescribed Tylenol, if she got a product containing Tylenol at the pharmacy, presumably there would be dispensing records. In the "methods" section, it says researchers took the number of tablets dispensed, divided it out over the time period and categorized women as having "no" use of Tylenol, or low, medium, or high use of Tylenol. But - going by dispensing records doesn't tell the whole story. Since Tylenol is non-prescription, if the women thought it was not enough, she could have bought more; or it may have been prescribed but she thought she didn't need it, and didn't take all of it.
Also - as they noted, many conditions don't require a doctor visit or hospitalization, and if a woman is at home taking Tylenol, they don't have an accurate way to account for that. They know that asking women later is not highly accurate - they said so in the limitations. Doctors or midwives were supposed to ask about Tylenol use at home but patients are not necessarily going to remember later how many tablets they took during some previous time period.
So - Ahlqvist is especially a good study if you own stock in Tylenol, because they do conclude "no problem." But I have a problem with it because I'd like to know - how many mothers took Tylenol for as long as four weeks? Ahlqvist doesn't know, and can't tell us. But in the Prada study, 2025, they did see that women who took Tylenol for 4 weeks or longer had an increased risk of having a child develop autism. And that overall the association between Tylenol use during pregnancy and autism was strong, but stronger in those who took for 4+ weeks.
The Ahlqvist study (2024) is here if you want to look at it yourself:
The study that came out in August, 2025, showing a strong association between Tylenol and autism especially after 4 weeks of Tylenol, indicating a "dose effect" is: Diddier Prada, Beate Ritz, Ann Z. Bauer, Andrea A. Baccarelli. Evaluation of the evidence on acetaminophen use and neurodevelopmental disorders using the Navigation Guide methodology. Environmental Health, 2025; 24 (1) DOI: 10.1186/s12940-025-01208-0
Of note, Dr. Andrea A. Baccarelli is the Dean of Harvard's T. H. Chan School of Public Health, who is also a professor of Epidemiology at Harvard, and an article about this published research study is posted at the website of the H. T. Chan School of Public Health at Harvard.
"The researchers analyzed results from 46 previous studies worldwide that investigated the potential link between prenatal acetaminophen use and subsequent NDDs in children. The researchers used the Navigation Guide Systematic Review methodology—a gold-standard framework for synthesizing and evaluating environmental health data—which enabled them to conduct a rigorous, comprehensive analysis that supported evidence of an association between acetaminophen exposure during pregnancy and increased incidence of NDDs." [NDDs are "neurological developmental disorders."]
"The researchers noted that while steps should be taken to limit acetaminophen use, the drug is important for treating pain and fever during pregnancy, which can also harm the developing fetus. High fever can raise the risk of neural tube defects and preterm birth. “We recommend judicious acetaminophen use—lowest effective dose, shortest duration—under medical guidance, tailored to individual risk-benefit assessments, rather than a broad limitation,” they wrote."
"In late September, the Food and Drug Administration announced it would issue a letter to clinicians urging them to be cautious about the use of acetaminophen in pregnancy. Baccarelli said he had discussed his study with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in the weeks leading up to that announcement and provided the White House team with an statement noting his research found “evidence of an association” between prenatal exposure to acetaminophen and neurodevelopmental disorders. “That association is strongest when acetaminophen is taken for four weeks or longer,” Baccarelli said."
"The statement continued: “Further research is needed to confirm the association and determine causality, but based on existing evidence, I believe that caution about acetaminophen use during pregnancy—especially heavy or prolonged use—is warranted.”"
Baccarelli noted in the “competing interests” section of the research paper that he has served as an expert witness for plaintiffs in a case involving potential links between acetaminophen use during pregnancy and neurodevelopmental disorders.
I don't think Tylenol is the biggest problem - Canadian researcher Jessica Rose in her substack from earlier this year, did one graph showing how the cumulative amount of aluminum that kids received in vaccines correlated extremely well with the number of autism cases, and also she made up a table showing how many doses of aluminum people receive starting in infancy and on into adult life. Taking aluminum out of the shots should make some difference and perhaps we'll start seeing the numbers of autism cases go down because of it - we'll still have the cases we have now, but maybe fewer new cases.
Also, apparently children today get 72 doses of vaccines between birth and age 18, and no one has ever studied the safety of taking so many vaccines, and often at the same time.
I think it is likely that we will see a big part of the problem will be found to be the aluminum, and the vaccine schedules, and I suspect some of the vaccines - and I understand Dr. McCullough has some new research that will be out soon.
But for pregnant moms who want to know - should they take Tylenol? Well, they should talk to their primary doctor, who if she/he is listening to ACOG will say "no problem" though if they read the actual research or the news item as above - they may say - you know, I think I'd rather pass on the Tylenol. "Paternalism" is when the MD's at ACOG know best, and they don't need to give you information that let's you make your own decision. FDA is right to let you know there could be a problem, and I know Baccarelli thinks it's real. But - it's also true that allowing a high fever to run its course and not taking Tylenol to bring the fever down could also be a problem, which is a reason to talk to your own doctor about it. But as the FDA message says, use caution - don't take it unless you really need it. (And those who use Tylenol might want to take it along with NAC, n-acetylcysteine which helps to replenish your glutathione.)
Thank you, Martha, for your relevant poignant insights. If I am insisting with my line of thoughts it is because I do believe it is extremely important to get to the bottom of this issue. I do think that Prada study authors, President Trump and the Secretary Kennedy are damn right to issue the call for caution re Tylenol. I have great respect and admiration for Dr. McCullough, but I think he is missing something important here in this debate. Well, I do not expect that, as a human being, he ought to know and master every aspect of medicine. I reached out to him to share with him my experience (I helped many patients reverse many conditions deemed incurable and fatal/terminal by conventional medicine), and I hope he got my email, knowing that he is a very busy man.
I repeat: To start with, I would like to state, document and share the fact of common sense that if A can lead to B and B can lead to C, then A could inevitably lead to C. So, it seems totally reasonable and responsible to say: «if you don´t want to end up in C, do not take the route A, just because you may end up in C, which you definitely don´t want. If Tylenol can cause Glutathione deficiency (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15878691/) and Glutathione deficiency can cause neurodevelopmental disorders (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8229148/pdf/ijms-22-06171.pdf), then it should be a common sense to realize that Tylenol can (even if indirectly) cause brain damages, whatever you want to call it (ADHD, ADD, ASD, Encephalitis, etc., etc.).
This is interesting: «Hooker said glutathione is the molecule that ´tags´ acetaminophen. He explained:
´Healthy adults have an intact beta-glucuronidation pathway to eliminate acetaminophen. Infants and children up to age 6 don’t have this. So they need to rely on sulfation and oxidation, which both suffer when glutathione stores are threatened or overtaxed by oxidative stresses and/or genetic components. This allows the buildup of NAPQI [N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine] — a toxic metabolite of acetaminophen — in the brain, causing neural damage».
«Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., senior research scientist for CHD, said the buildup of NAPQI occurs because ´acetaminophen also crosses the placental barrier.´ He added:
´The primary mechanism for metabolizing acetaminophen in adults does not exist for fetuses … the excess acetaminophen must go down one of the other pathways, inevitably leading to increased NAPQI production and glutathione depletion.´
It seems that the reason why conventional medical doctors prescribe Tylenol or other pain-killers so promptly, may have to do with the fact that they seem to have been trained not to undeerstand the root causes of pain (a language the body uses to tell us that something is not right), but yes, they seem to have been trained to just identify the symptoms and shut them off with anaesthetics or pain-killers, instead of trying to figure out what are the underlining factors contributing to the symptoms. It is just embarrassing. I feel sorry for those doctors, who have just been turned into little more than sales reps for Big Pharma. It looks obvious to me that if the Big Pharma wants to sell its drugs, it will not fund conventional medical schools to teach medical students how to cure diseases, unless it wants to go bankrupt.
If I can still remember, when I did my Anatomy, Physiology and Pathophysiology training coupled with a unique therapeutic bodywork training (done Downunder), I learnt that the fever rarely goes beyond 42 Celsius degree and that it could be counterproductive to use synthetic chemicals to bring it down. I found that the special technique to promote adequate mechanotransduction can and did modulate hypothalamus functions and promoted homeostasis (probably homeodynamic is a more realistic word, as in a living body all is dynamic).
«In summary, as an essential factor contributing to health and diseases in organisms, cellular mechanotransduction widely affects tissue homeostasis, fibrotic diseases, tumorigenesis, metabolism, and others. Therefore, a broader overview of mechanical cues is a great challenge for researchers. This current review presents the mechanisms of mechanical cues-associated pathophysiological processes in organisms and sheds light on the therapeutic targets of multiple diseases» (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41392-023-01501-9).
The same thing goes for vaccines. If the vaccines are made safe and effective to prevent diseases or disease factors (viral, parasitic, bacterial or fungal infections), how is the Big Pharma going to sell its lucrative products and avoid bankrupcy? I have the impression that the majority of the conventional medical doctors have not yet understood this equasion, which is, in itself, pretty problematic. When conventional medical schools and doctors become independent again, they will teach and learn how to reduce and/or eliminate physical pain, in minutes or few hours, with adequate personalised mechanotransduction (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41392-023-01501-9), adequate personalised natural chelation (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3654245/) and, given that we´re the results of what we consume, personalised nutrition (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8224682/).
The fact that western medical instituitions approaches do not want and have not yet identified the definitive link and the exact mechanism of action of its procuct-induced diseases and neurodevelopmental disorders, is not prove that Tylenol, other drugs and vaccines are safe. Far from it. It is clear and understandable that the disease industrial complex has a desire to not find links between its products and diseases. It is clear that ill-intended procedures have been put in place to make it difficult to find links between pharmaceutical products and diseases. By the time competent, honest and independent doctors, scientists and experts manage to overcome the hurdles and establish definitive factors and links to real chronic diseases, billions of people will have been injured, and perished from the same chronic diseases. Pretty sad, indeed!
Then I wonder why the makers of Tylenol issued a precaution about taking Tylenol during pregnancy, well before any of the current warnings came out….????
Mum is told to use paracetamol if there is an inflammatory reaction to childhood vaccines.
The body's major antioxidant is glutathione that mops up inflammation. After childhood vaccines there is acute immune activation which depletes glutathione; similarly, the paracetamol depletes glutathione. Without enough glutathione the body gets extremely inflamed and cannot handle cellular stress.
The inflamed state of the brain is associated with neurological disorders; encephalitis is listed as a side-effect of most injections, and this will rage on if there is depleted glutathione. Brain inflammation can lead to SIDS nor ASD. They have not studied effects of giving several childhood injections in one go.
If one of the reasons women might need Tylenol during pregnancy is due to receiving a vaccination, WHY ARE WE VACCINATING THEM??? Could this also account for an upsurge in miscarriages?
Absolutely. Data show increase in miscarriage rate in the “vaccinated.”
Especially the c shots.
Indeed....one would ask "why?"....but we all know the answer -- those who read this substack, anyway...
Dr. Mike Yeadon did opine on this point. "Your government wants you dead" and that includes your unborn "useless eaters"....So get over it.
Don't take their toxic "vaccines" don't support the complicit drug companies, don't believe their lies. Simple. Taking any unnecessary drug during pregnancy is manifestly insane.
But many of us are these days......the "vaccine" has added considerably to the burden of the very ill and that includes "insanity." The future does NOT look bright. It did look very bright a few years ago....but the criminal "elites" have since launched a full out attack on the rest of humanity. Remember what it said on the "guidestones"? 5OO,OOO is the optimum number for humans....And so "they" are working hard on this....Hold on to your hats...it is bound to get a lot worse...with rampant weather manipulation and all out war.
Much gratitude and thanks to Nicholas and Dr. McCullough for their courage and honesty in the face of universal deceit. I am 75. I have taken no drugs for decades. I am fine. I use food as my medicine and drink a variety of herbal teas. I suffered from rheumatoid arthritis a while back and was told it was "incurable"....that was a lie. Now I am quite limber and pain free. Most things that are "incurable" can be at the very least "mitigated."
As I understand the controversy, the childhood vaccinations CAUSE FEVERS. Mothers then, advised by their doctors, take TYLENOL, in hand, give it to the child, and harm the child by fighting a fever caused by the vaccines. I understand also that the depletion of glutathion is a mechanism of acetaminophen that causes further problems, such as reducing the ability of the immune system to fight the inflammation caused by the "vaccines". This is a prime example of PHARMA creating a problem (a market) and selling billions of dollars worth of drugs to "treat" the "problem" they intentionally caused. Dr. McCullough... please confirm the FACTS of this issue, specifically, that Tylenol is a greatly overused medication, often prescribed, with understated risks, ESPECIALLY regarding the genesis of AUTISM. THE TRUTH HAS NOT BEEN CLEARLY STATED YET. (While I an not a doctor, I see plainly that the truth cuts as cleanly as a surgeons scalpel). Depleting glutathion IS NOT a good idea. Treating simple, low grade fever with Tylenol is quite likely MOSTLY unnecessary... BUT, however, inducing fever by injecting babies with multiple doses of fecal/chemical/metallic/foreign protein poisons, and then concurrently depleting their glutathion with Tylenol is astoundingly perverse.
Yes. And why have we not heard Dr. McCullough and his group write about ninpharmacologic methods for reducing fever?
Good question, Allie. A full dissertation on the proper treatment of fever is in order. Generally, fever should not be treated... it is the bodies natural treatment for an infection, and should not be interfered with by pharma.
You’re correct about the body’s use of fever as a defense against infection. But too high fever can precipitate seizures and fetal loss. The question should be, when is fever too high when those risks cannot be managed by physical means.
Of course, Allie, that is the issue... doctors often do not tell mothers the necessary facts, and simple fevers are getting treated by mothers who care, but are without the necessary knowledge. I understand that a fever of 105 F is a medical emergency, whereas a fever of 104 F can be tolerated safely for a short time. 103 F and under should be left alone, and monitored. The real question, in my view is... why are babies being given useless, fever inducing vaccines. Babies do not need vaccines, and are currently being forced to take them, often against the will of the parents, and most often without the consent of parents. Pharma is killing babies. Stop the "vaccinations", and the problem disappears.
Yes...indeed...they "hate us for our freedoms"....and for being born. So we are harmed at every opportunity. Why do we need Tylenol anyway....when aspirin works great, was originally plant derived and does little harm? We are told it causes "ulcers"...does it really? I don't know. What do others think?
Hi Kathleen, I thought I would chime in, it's been a while. Aspirin reduces clotting, and thereby increases bleeding, if bleeding occurs for one of many reasons, while taking Aspirin. Surgeons need to know if a patient has been taking Aspirin for that reason. It is the same reason doctors (used to) recommend one 'baby aspirin a day for adults. (I don't think babies should be given Aspirin, personally). The cause of 'ulcers' is usually Helicobacter Pylori, sometimes found in raw milk. It is treated with a three combo of antibiotic. There may be other causes of ulcers, lesions related to cancers, for example, but Aspirin (Salicylic Acid) if abused, used in large amounts, or daily could likely cause 'ulcers' in people with weakened blood vessels. The use of Aspirin has diminished over time, as doctors realized they were mistaken... about safe and effective. Nothing new. NSAIDS are not safe and effective, having harmed many.
Thanks for taking the trouble to inform me. I rarely used aspirin for my children--but then I was very lucky in that they were vigorous and healthy. I never trusted Tylenol...just a gut feeling I had and still have. I think I read a study about Tylenol and liver damage...not sure on that. Well...there certainly are many drugs out there that are used extensively and some people need them desperately. My husband takes drugs that help for his neurological condition--valproac acid is one...been around a long time and helps him. Drugs have saved numerous lives ....including my own on occasion. My Dad suffered from ulcers and believe me, it never crossed his mind to have "raw milk"....What people choose to put into their mouths is a source of endless fascination and debate and may be less influential than the thoughts we habitually entertain. . I see your posts a lot here and you seem quite well informed. I have learned a lot from Dr. McCullough and author Nicolas Hulscher and am so grateful for their courage and devotion to the healing arts and to truthful information. Best KN
Thanks Kathleen, all the best, and God bless you.
I think even the Romans knew it. Pregnant mothers should ingest nothing foreign into their bodies. No medicines if at all possible, And certainly no vaccines. Why are we not giving Aspirin another look? Reyes syndrome Came out of nowhere about the time all the other painkillers came on the market. We need to look hard at those studies again. Willow bark's been used forever.
I agree, but bleeding risk may still be a concern since aspirin and other NSAIDs impair platelet aggregation. That’s why aspirin is often given to someone having a heart attack caused by a clot blocking a coronary artery.
While I understand not wanting to take the focus off of “vaccines” during pregnancy as the cause for autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders, the cause of autism is multifactorial and complex, and, I think, that people may interpret the headline of this article to be “assured” that acetaminophen use during pregnancy is safe and no cause for concern. As I have written elsewhere on this Substack, there are nonpharmacologic methods for reducing fever and pain which should be employed, and acetaminophen should be used only when the risk to the fetus or child is high if those methods fail.
Appears to be a distraction by pharma to protect vaxx cash.
There is no doubt at all, in my mind, that Dr. McCullough is an outstanding, competent, honest, independent and courageous health practitioner, who has done so much to help mitigate a lot of the predicament we´ve found ourselves in for decades. And, from his posture in medicine, I have noticed that he is also a very open-minded person, willing to go the extra mile to accomodate new meaninful knowledge. This is why I would like to give my humble contribution in a bid to enrich this long overdue debate on the spiralling chronic diseases, not only in USA, but worldwide, with devastating consequences.
To start with, I would like to state, document and share the fact of common sense that if A can lead to B and B can lead to C, then A could inevitably lead to C. So, it seems totally reasonable and responsible to say: «if you don´t want to end up in C, do not take the route A, just because you may end up in C, which you definitely don´t want. If Tylenol can cause Glutathione deficiency (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15878691/) and Glutathione deficiency can cause neurodevelopmental disorders (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8229148/pdf/ijms-22-06171.pdf), then it should be a common sense to realize that Tylenol can cause brain damages, whatever you want to call it (ADHD, ADD, ASD, Encephalitis, etc., etc.).
It seems that the reason why conventional medical doctors prescribe Tylenol or other pain-killers so promptly, may have to do with the fact that they seem to have been trained not to undeerstand the root causes of pain (a language the body uses to tell us that something is not right), but yes, they seem to have been trained to just identify the symptoms and shut them off with anaesthetics or pain-killers, instead of trying to figure out what are the underlining factors contributing to the symptoms. It is just embarrassing. I feel sorry for those doctors, who have just been turned into little more than sales reps for Big Pharma. It looks obvious to me that if the Big Pharma wants to sell its drugs, it will not fund conventional medical schools to teach medical students how to cure diseases, unless it wants to go bankrupt.
The same thing goes for vaccines. If the vaccines are made safe and effective to prevent diseases or disease factors (viral, parasitic, bacterial or fungal infections), how is the Big Pharma going to sell its lucrative products and avoid bankrupcy? I have the impression that the majority of the conventional medical doctors have not yet understood this equasion, which is, in itself, pretty problematic. When conventional medical schools and doctors become independent again, they will teach and learn how to reduce and/or eliminate physical pain, in minutes or few hours, with adequate personalised mechanotransduction (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41392-023-01501-9), adequate personalised natural chelation (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3654245/) and, given that we´re the results of what we consume, personalised nutrition (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8224682/).
The fact that western medical instituitions approaches do not want and have not yet identified the definitive link and the exact mechanism of action of its procuct-induced diseases and neurodevelopmental disorders, is not prove that Tylenol, other drugs and vaccines are safe. Far from it. It is clear and understandable that the disease industrial complex has a desire to not find links between its products and diseases. It is clear that ill-intended procedures have been put in place to make it difficult to find links between pharmaceutical products and diseases. By the time competent, honest and independent doctors, scientists and experts manage to overcome the hurdles and establish definitive factors and links to real chronic diseases, billions of people will have been injured, and perished from the same chronic diseases. Pretty sad, indeed!
I forwarded further personal info to Dr. McCullough, so he will become aware of where I am coming from.
We must win! The Truth should prevail!
Kind regards
We, humans, are playing with fire, big time. President Trump and Secretary Kennedy are damn right. It seems that they still have and use common sense. And more, they did not come up with this stuff themselves. There is enough evidence that those analgesics are harming people, especially children and teenagers. Tylenol harms people directly and indirectly, alone or in combination, especially through pregnancy, causing brain damages and endocrine disruptions (gender dysphoria?). Call it whatever you like, but let´s stop this madness. We should be able to stop the psychopaths, infiltrated in medicine, from further injuring our kids. Why is it not happening yet?
It looks as if it will have to come from us, parents. We have to stop this, now. The so called health specialists seem to be too busy creating problems for their own survival and are unwilling to use common sense to understand the real world, where foreign substances entering human body are causing havoc.
We already have enough evidence to figure out that besides causing neurologic impairment in kids, acetaminophen, some other analgesics and agrotoxics are also causing endocrine disruptions, likely leading to gender dysphoria in children and teenagers and young adults. There is an explosion of kids and teens with gender confusion. It may be all part of the big agenda of depopulation, but enough is enough. Those responsible for all this mess are not only disregarding robust evidence, but are also doing nothing to prevent and solve chronic diseases and gender dysphoria plaguing our kids. They don´t only want to kill those alive, but also to prevent more from getting born.
We already have enough robust evidence to figure out that those pain-killers, glyphosate, atrazine and some other agrotoxics (and also chemtrails-a cocktail of dangerous chemicals and nanoparticles) are causing brain damages and endocrine disruptions and the resulting gender dysphoria, and the related forceful push for social inclusion of the victims. It looks as though it is all part of the depopulation agenda games.
When Big Pharma wants to protect their bottom line it pays for bogus studies and medical consensus. When the medical consensus is genuine and evidence-based, but is seen as a threat to Big Pharma´s profit, it pays to have the genuine consensus discredited. Who is going to stop this charade before it is too late?
Developed and strong countries should be doing much more to stop this madness. With our national leaders, military, authorities and health agencies behaving like we´ve seen, we will not need foreign enemies to come and destroy us. Our own leaders are doing that for them. They are handing us over on a tray to be slaughtered and exterminated by the enemies (including Big Pharma) within:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8580820/pdf/41574_2021_Article_553.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2012.01282.x?msockid=16e6fc4d5c676e340326e9285d0b6f53
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0300483X09003047?via%3Dihub
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4181665/pdf/nihms630661.pdf
https://wltreport.com/2025/02/21/president-trump-now-exposing-chemtrails/
https://chemtrailsmuststop.com/2014/07/planetary-weapons-and-military-weather-modification-chemtrails-atmospheric-geoengineering-and-environmental-warfare/
didn't read the whole thing...but liked this part "We should be able to stop the psychopaths, infiltrated in medicine, from further injuring our kids. Why is it not happening yet? It looks as if it will have to come from us, parents. We have to stop this, now. The so called health specialists seem to be too busy creating problems for their own survival and are unwilling to use common sense to understand the real world, where foreign substances entering human body are causing havoc."
Yeah...well THE BUCK ALWAYS DID STOP HERE. We are responsible and that means totally...for whatever goes into our mouths and those of our minor children. As long as we have at least that much controlled it should be rigorously exercised. If we neglect this obvious fact then it is our own fault. The more damage done to our bodies and immune systems...the more we "need" the so-called health professionals. If we are healthy then they make no money...so what does that tell us?
Here is the answer: their drug products are designed to harm us so we need "medical care".
End of story
This is what ACOG says, as quoted by Dr. McCullough: “In more than two decades of research on the use of acetaminophen in pregnancy, not a single reputable study has successfully concluded that the use of acetaminophen in any trimester of pregnancy causes neurodevelopmental disorders in children. In fact, the two highest-quality studies on this subject—one of which was published in JAMA last year—found no significant associations between use of acetaminophen during pregnancy and children’s risk of autism, ADHD, or intellectual disability."
The JAMA study that ACOG is referring to here is by Ahlqvist et al., 2024 (the "Swedish" study). Here is the problem with that study that found no harm from Tylenol.
A section on the "limitations" of the study says: "[E]xposure assessment was not perfect [meaning - knowing and documenting which mothers and babies took Tylenol, how much and for how long, was incomplete]. Antenatal [prenatal] data in the Medical Birth Register only recorded whether a birthing parent used acetaminophen, without regard to dose, duration, or timing. Prescription dispensation records might not reflect OTC [over-the-counter, nonprescription] use of acetaminophen. Thus, more specific aspects of exposure could not be assessed, and one cannot definitively exclude the possibility that use of acetaminophen beyond a certain dose at a critical point might pose some risk. This study’s finding that 7.49% of birthing parents used acetaminophen during pregnancy is lower than in some studies, but is concordant with other studies. Self-reported medication use is subject to underreporting of actual use. This study did not have data on conditions that did not require inpatient or outpatient medical care. Many indications for acetaminophen use, such as headache, infection, fever, and other pain, may not rise to a level that warrants seeking medical attention. Thus, capture of potential indications is incomplete."
If the woman was hospitalized and the doctor ordered Tylenol there would be pharmacy dispensing records to go by; if she had a doctor visit and was prescribed Tylenol, if she got a product containing Tylenol at the pharmacy, presumably there would be dispensing records. In the "methods" section, it says researchers took the number of tablets dispensed, divided it out over the time period and categorized women as having "no" use of Tylenol, or low, medium, or high use of Tylenol. But - going by dispensing records doesn't tell the whole story. Since Tylenol is non-prescription, if the women thought it was not enough, she could have bought more; or it may have been prescribed but she thought she didn't need it, and didn't take all of it.
Also - as they noted, many conditions don't require a doctor visit or hospitalization, and if a woman is at home taking Tylenol, they don't have an accurate way to account for that. They know that asking women later is not highly accurate - they said so in the limitations. Doctors or midwives were supposed to ask about Tylenol use at home but patients are not necessarily going to remember later how many tablets they took during some previous time period.
So - Ahlqvist is especially a good study if you own stock in Tylenol, because they do conclude "no problem." But I have a problem with it because I'd like to know - how many mothers took Tylenol for as long as four weeks? Ahlqvist doesn't know, and can't tell us. But in the Prada study, 2025, they did see that women who took Tylenol for 4 weeks or longer had an increased risk of having a child develop autism. And that overall the association between Tylenol use during pregnancy and autism was strong, but stronger in those who took for 4+ weeks.
The Ahlqvist study (2024) is here if you want to look at it yourself:
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2817406
The "good news" from ACOG (American College of OB/GYN) that says "no harm" from Tylenol is here:
https://www.acog.org/news/news-releases/2025/09/acog-affirms-safety-benefits-acetaminophen-pregnancy?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
The study that came out in August, 2025, showing a strong association between Tylenol and autism especially after 4 weeks of Tylenol, indicating a "dose effect" is: Diddier Prada, Beate Ritz, Ann Z. Bauer, Andrea A. Baccarelli. Evaluation of the evidence on acetaminophen use and neurodevelopmental disorders using the Navigation Guide methodology. Environmental Health, 2025; 24 (1) DOI: 10.1186/s12940-025-01208-0
Link to this peer-reviewed study is here: https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-025-01208-0
Of note, Dr. Andrea A. Baccarelli is the Dean of Harvard's T. H. Chan School of Public Health, who is also a professor of Epidemiology at Harvard, and an article about this published research study is posted at the website of the H. T. Chan School of Public Health at Harvard.
A news article about this study “Using acetaminophen during pregnancy may increase children’s autism and ADHD risk,” by Jay Lau was posted on August 20, 2025, here at the website of Harvard's T. H. Chan School of Public Health: https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/using-acetaminophen-during-pregnancy-may-increase-childrens-autism-and-adhd-risk/
"The researchers analyzed results from 46 previous studies worldwide that investigated the potential link between prenatal acetaminophen use and subsequent NDDs in children. The researchers used the Navigation Guide Systematic Review methodology—a gold-standard framework for synthesizing and evaluating environmental health data—which enabled them to conduct a rigorous, comprehensive analysis that supported evidence of an association between acetaminophen exposure during pregnancy and increased incidence of NDDs." [NDDs are "neurological developmental disorders."]
"The researchers noted that while steps should be taken to limit acetaminophen use, the drug is important for treating pain and fever during pregnancy, which can also harm the developing fetus. High fever can raise the risk of neural tube defects and preterm birth. “We recommend judicious acetaminophen use—lowest effective dose, shortest duration—under medical guidance, tailored to individual risk-benefit assessments, rather than a broad limitation,” they wrote."
"In late September, the Food and Drug Administration announced it would issue a letter to clinicians urging them to be cautious about the use of acetaminophen in pregnancy. Baccarelli said he had discussed his study with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in the weeks leading up to that announcement and provided the White House team with an statement noting his research found “evidence of an association” between prenatal exposure to acetaminophen and neurodevelopmental disorders. “That association is strongest when acetaminophen is taken for four weeks or longer,” Baccarelli said."
"The statement continued: “Further research is needed to confirm the association and determine causality, but based on existing evidence, I believe that caution about acetaminophen use during pregnancy—especially heavy or prolonged use—is warranted.”"
Baccarelli noted in the “competing interests” section of the research paper that he has served as an expert witness for plaintiffs in a case involving potential links between acetaminophen use during pregnancy and neurodevelopmental disorders.
The FDA guidance is reported on here, and I don't think they are wrong: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-responds-evidence-possible-association-between-autism-and-acetaminophen-use-during-pregnancy
I don't think Tylenol is the biggest problem - Canadian researcher Jessica Rose in her substack from earlier this year, did one graph showing how the cumulative amount of aluminum that kids received in vaccines correlated extremely well with the number of autism cases, and also she made up a table showing how many doses of aluminum people receive starting in infancy and on into adult life. Taking aluminum out of the shots should make some difference and perhaps we'll start seeing the numbers of autism cases go down because of it - we'll still have the cases we have now, but maybe fewer new cases.
Also, apparently children today get 72 doses of vaccines between birth and age 18, and no one has ever studied the safety of taking so many vaccines, and often at the same time.
I think it is likely that we will see a big part of the problem will be found to be the aluminum, and the vaccine schedules, and I suspect some of the vaccines - and I understand Dr. McCullough has some new research that will be out soon.
But for pregnant moms who want to know - should they take Tylenol? Well, they should talk to their primary doctor, who if she/he is listening to ACOG will say "no problem" though if they read the actual research or the news item as above - they may say - you know, I think I'd rather pass on the Tylenol. "Paternalism" is when the MD's at ACOG know best, and they don't need to give you information that let's you make your own decision. FDA is right to let you know there could be a problem, and I know Baccarelli thinks it's real. But - it's also true that allowing a high fever to run its course and not taking Tylenol to bring the fever down could also be a problem, which is a reason to talk to your own doctor about it. But as the FDA message says, use caution - don't take it unless you really need it. (And those who use Tylenol might want to take it along with NAC, n-acetylcysteine which helps to replenish your glutathione.)
Thank you, Martha, for your relevant poignant insights. If I am insisting with my line of thoughts it is because I do believe it is extremely important to get to the bottom of this issue. I do think that Prada study authors, President Trump and the Secretary Kennedy are damn right to issue the call for caution re Tylenol. I have great respect and admiration for Dr. McCullough, but I think he is missing something important here in this debate. Well, I do not expect that, as a human being, he ought to know and master every aspect of medicine. I reached out to him to share with him my experience (I helped many patients reverse many conditions deemed incurable and fatal/terminal by conventional medicine), and I hope he got my email, knowing that he is a very busy man.
I repeat: To start with, I would like to state, document and share the fact of common sense that if A can lead to B and B can lead to C, then A could inevitably lead to C. So, it seems totally reasonable and responsible to say: «if you don´t want to end up in C, do not take the route A, just because you may end up in C, which you definitely don´t want. If Tylenol can cause Glutathione deficiency (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15878691/) and Glutathione deficiency can cause neurodevelopmental disorders (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8229148/pdf/ijms-22-06171.pdf), then it should be a common sense to realize that Tylenol can (even if indirectly) cause brain damages, whatever you want to call it (ADHD, ADD, ASD, Encephalitis, etc., etc.).
This is interesting: «Hooker said glutathione is the molecule that ´tags´ acetaminophen. He explained:
´Healthy adults have an intact beta-glucuronidation pathway to eliminate acetaminophen. Infants and children up to age 6 don’t have this. So they need to rely on sulfation and oxidation, which both suffer when glutathione stores are threatened or overtaxed by oxidative stresses and/or genetic components. This allows the buildup of NAPQI [N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine] — a toxic metabolite of acetaminophen — in the brain, causing neural damage».
«Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., senior research scientist for CHD, said the buildup of NAPQI occurs because ´acetaminophen also crosses the placental barrier.´ He added:
´The primary mechanism for metabolizing acetaminophen in adults does not exist for fetuses … the excess acetaminophen must go down one of the other pathways, inevitably leading to increased NAPQI production and glutathione depletion.´
«Parker said that NAPQI can be neutralized by glutathione, which he said acts as a ´master antioxidant in all plants and all animals, including humans.´ However, ´many variables can affect the level of glutathione, leaving some individuals at risk for acetaminophen-mediated injury.´ (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/rfk-jr-tylenol-chugging-tiktok-acetaminophen-pregnancy-autism-risk-drinking-alcohol/?utm_source=cc&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=defender&utm_id=20251010).
It seems that the reason why conventional medical doctors prescribe Tylenol or other pain-killers so promptly, may have to do with the fact that they seem to have been trained not to undeerstand the root causes of pain (a language the body uses to tell us that something is not right), but yes, they seem to have been trained to just identify the symptoms and shut them off with anaesthetics or pain-killers, instead of trying to figure out what are the underlining factors contributing to the symptoms. It is just embarrassing. I feel sorry for those doctors, who have just been turned into little more than sales reps for Big Pharma. It looks obvious to me that if the Big Pharma wants to sell its drugs, it will not fund conventional medical schools to teach medical students how to cure diseases, unless it wants to go bankrupt.
If I can still remember, when I did my Anatomy, Physiology and Pathophysiology training coupled with a unique therapeutic bodywork training (done Downunder), I learnt that the fever rarely goes beyond 42 Celsius degree and that it could be counterproductive to use synthetic chemicals to bring it down. I found that the special technique to promote adequate mechanotransduction can and did modulate hypothalamus functions and promoted homeostasis (probably homeodynamic is a more realistic word, as in a living body all is dynamic).
«In summary, as an essential factor contributing to health and diseases in organisms, cellular mechanotransduction widely affects tissue homeostasis, fibrotic diseases, tumorigenesis, metabolism, and others. Therefore, a broader overview of mechanical cues is a great challenge for researchers. This current review presents the mechanisms of mechanical cues-associated pathophysiological processes in organisms and sheds light on the therapeutic targets of multiple diseases» (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41392-023-01501-9).
The same thing goes for vaccines. If the vaccines are made safe and effective to prevent diseases or disease factors (viral, parasitic, bacterial or fungal infections), how is the Big Pharma going to sell its lucrative products and avoid bankrupcy? I have the impression that the majority of the conventional medical doctors have not yet understood this equasion, which is, in itself, pretty problematic. When conventional medical schools and doctors become independent again, they will teach and learn how to reduce and/or eliminate physical pain, in minutes or few hours, with adequate personalised mechanotransduction (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41392-023-01501-9), adequate personalised natural chelation (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3654245/) and, given that we´re the results of what we consume, personalised nutrition (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8224682/).
The fact that western medical instituitions approaches do not want and have not yet identified the definitive link and the exact mechanism of action of its procuct-induced diseases and neurodevelopmental disorders, is not prove that Tylenol, other drugs and vaccines are safe. Far from it. It is clear and understandable that the disease industrial complex has a desire to not find links between its products and diseases. It is clear that ill-intended procedures have been put in place to make it difficult to find links between pharmaceutical products and diseases. By the time competent, honest and independent doctors, scientists and experts manage to overcome the hurdles and establish definitive factors and links to real chronic diseases, billions of people will have been injured, and perished from the same chronic diseases. Pretty sad, indeed!