So why did he confess to his parents and minister? Why was he on the roof with a rifle? Why did he brag about doing it to his online friends. Sorry, but he did it and oddities about the bullet won’t change that.
WHY do you BELIEVE that what 'THEY' (the LYING 'govt') says is anywhere near the truth???
There was NO ONE on that roof; it was, CLEARLY, an 'AI' created video!
See the 'people' walking on the sidewalk, in the far right of the vid?.....they VANISH, while walking. And that 'jump from the roof'?......funny how that 'person' landed, on the ground, with NO problem.....not a fall, or a misstep.....nothing!.....a PERFECT 'landing'! (for a skinny/whimpy kid!)
Yes, this is how I counter speculation that can barely be labeled as such. You’re completely incoherent, you’re saying things like “a skinny/whimpy kid shouldn’t have been able to jump off a roof”, and that the video is AI. All before any evidence is presented at trial. And then you went on and on about trumps ear after he was shot, which is also bizarre. There’s a scar. It’s visible. Legacy news media, who hate trumps guts, also got a pic of the bullet as it clipped him. It’s absurd to say it didn’t happen.
When I say you’re crazy this is what I mean—your certainty that you’re right, before anywhere near the amount of data one would need to make that claim has able to be ascertained or understood, is pure insanity. You have completely lost the plot, and your “evidence” to the contrary is nonsensical AT BEST. Get a grip, it’s not that hard.
Legacy news media got a pic of the bullet you say? Oh well then - the whole thing can't possibly have been staged, can it?
I mean there are three possible scenarios:
1. The event was not staged and a cameraman just happened to be in the perfect position to capture the speeding bullet and was taking a picture at the precise time necessary.
2. The event was staged and a cameraman (the same one who captured a previous presidential assassination too as far as I remember) just happened to be in the perfect position to capture the speeding bullet and was taking a picture at the precise time necessary.
3. The event was staged and a photo was subsequently faked.
It's obvious to the meanest intellect that (1) is by far the most likely explanation here. Isn't it?
Oh - and by the way - the length of the streak in that pic doesn't match the reported rifle muzzle velocity and shutter speed of the camera. Perhaps those details were just misreported...
Dawnie, there are so many idiots walking around who believe everything the TV tells them, please don't waste your energy, maybe one day they'll wake up. Please try to be positive and happy, I do firmly believe there are demons amongst us, feeding off the chaos in the world and our negative energy.
It’s the same for us all ….there is our individual perceptions and there is the truth ….and I prefer to not go with what the government are saying as it is almost always a lie 🥴
Understand all that, but their normal interest is in damning guns, not protecting furries. And as others have pointed out, they didn't say the 30-06 rifle was ruled out, just that it was not confirmed. Now apparently the FBI is doing its own testing, but their lab has a pretty bad record too.
Rabbi Isser Zalman Weisberg says President Trump is the non-Jewish Messiah, chosen to establish the Jewish Kingdom over all of mankind.
Weisberg draws a direct line from the bullet that grazed Trump’s ear to the Torah portion in Exodus 21:6, where a servant who wishes to remain with his master forever has his ear pierced against a doorpost with an awl. .
According to Weisberg, the failed assassination was a divine ritual. The bullet that nicked Trump’s ear was God’s awl, marking him as the Eved Hashem—the eternal servant of the Jewish people. “President Trump’s right ear was grazed in a symbolic gesture,” Weisberg argues, “where the Torah states that a servant who wants to remain with his master needs to have his right ear pierced”
And you are super smart, well above US mean IQ of rank #33, below communist and third world countries, and you are entertaining. Here's some funny stuff you believe: The regime in Iran has changed, even though it's with more hardliners now in charge. The underground missile cities are completely destroyed. The US "won" even though it triggered a global fuel crisis for the rest of the world and Iran can still build a dirty bomb.
Looks like this is where I part ways with the non-sense being shared here. P.S. - I do not recommend watching this... but if you still are believing any of the Conspiracy theories distracting you... This information was known and reported upon by this and other sources on 09/11/2025.... Stop lying - that is what you are doing when you do not know what you are talking about (I bet Charlie would not appreciate it and I Do Not appreciate it:
where is the replay of this incident ….The walk to the building dressed in pants, to coming off the roof in shorts after the shooting?
I read he changed clothes, but did he throw the weapon off the roof or have time to disassemble it then hide it and his other clothes in his shorts?
I didn’t see the weapon when he came off the building, but it was reported he left it on the ground in the grass under some trees on his way out of the area. What did I miss?
In which case the truth is unknowable, when facts are deniable. That is a position of chaos and injustice. NO ONE is trustworthy? We must re-establish truthfulness in ourselves, our media, our government officials, and eliminate liars, cheaters and corruption. Transparency might be the key but in addition a greater dedication to telling the truth without reference to our own personal biases.
1. A Trans kid wouldn't take a fall for Trumps's government
2. The story they told about locations completely indicts Charlie's security team because they would have seen him clearly from the stage.
3. He assembled, disassembled, ran from the scene through the woods, re-assembled the weapon and left it in plain site for someone to find. Some experts have said that the particular weapon wasn't even made for rapid disassembly.
4. There has been total silence of the investigation and where it was leading the investigators, now many months later we are hearing that the bullet isn't consistent with the gun?
5. It WOULD make sense that the Trans movement would put him up to this, but very much like the Trump attempted assassination, the planning, timing, positioning and escape plan were very clunky.
6. Erika decided before he was even convicted that Tyler had done it because she felt the need to publicly forgive him. She is a smart woman, what could she have been told, and by whom, that would convince her of his guilt, or was it really Tyler she was forgiving?
7. What could Charlie have unleashed by refusing to meet with Bibi that would have been worth killing him for? What has caused Candace to go so off the rails?
8. I guess the big question is...Who had something to gain, or was this simply a hate crime by the radical left?
A shame to see people hollering "dumb" at each other. The government has released very little info, and some of it, maybe a lot, is either wrong or makes no sense. But to respond to just one of your points, #7. Why kill Kirk?
Have you seen the hatred being directed at Tucker Carlson and Joe Kent by Israel firsters like Dershowitz, who used terms like "neo-Nazi fascist movement" and "an ideological coup attempt"? If Kirk were alive, he'd be getting the same treatment, as he spent two days at the White House last summer begging officials, including his friend Trump, not to destroy the administration by attacking Iran. Kirk is also on video stating that Israel likely stood down to allow Hamas' 10/7/2023 attack. And his texts in the two days before his murder said he was forced by donor bullying to break with Israel and that he feared he might be killed for doing so. Have you seen Netanyahu go on TV three separate times to declare Israel didn't do it, Charlie was their greatest friend (maybe true at one time, but not in the months before he was assassinated)? So motive? How about stopping someone from influencing Trump not to start a war Israel believed was existential?
With regard to Candace, she's been right about most everything due to having worked at TP/USA and having contacts there. Without her, we might not know about Kirk's texts or that there was no exit wound (TP/USA let her see the video from behind Charlie, and she recorded it). If you haven't seen it, go back and watch her first video after the murder, about a week later. It was a very moving, humanizing tribute to Charlie with lots of video of the two of them and other TP/USA people on road trips similar to the one to UVA (before the Gulfstream 5!), singing in the car, dancing, setting up displays. At the time I saw that video, I'd heard Kirk's name, but knew nothing about him.
Looks like this is where I part ways with the non-sense being shared here. P.S. - I do not recommend watching this... but if you still are believing any of the Conspiracy theories distracting you... This information was known and reported upon by this and other sources on 09/11/2025.... Stop lying - that is what you are doing when you do not know what you are talking about (I bet Charlie would not appreciate it and I Do Not appreciate it:
The report says, "unable to identify." The report doesn't say anything about whether it matched the gun or not, does it? "Not matching" and "unable to identify" are two different things, or am I missing something?
I thought the same thing about "unable to identify", especially since I earlier considered the lack of exit wound AND the immediate kill might have been the result of a "hollow point" bullet. Perhaps the way that type of bullet splits/flares on impact is why the FBI is "unable' to match it. (?)
Exactly. Well said. Unable to identify does not mean it doesn’t match. It probably means the bullet was so fragmented there weren’t large enough pieces for a positive id. Pretty simple actually.
Looks like this is where I part ways with the non-sense being shared here. P.S. - I do not recommend watching this... but if you still are believing any of the Conspiracy theories distracting you... This information was known and reported upon by this and other sources on 09/11/2025.... Stop lying - that is what you are doing when you do not know what you are talking about (I bet Charlie would not appreciate it and I Do Not appreciate it:
The defense quoted the ATF as stating they were “unable to identify” the bullet fragment to the rifle. “unable to identify” does not mean “ruled out.” Experts emphasize that inconclusive results are common when bullets fragment or pass through bone.
Me too, F O'K. A classic Jesuit/Zionist/Freemasonic/and in this case Mormon mass trauma/ritual sacrifice/psyop/by the numbers event, designed to mislead the despised human cattle. It astonished me how many "alternative media" folk appeared to fall for it, including even the Ickes, 21 Wire and CJ Bjerknes! Discernment needed, folks! FFS, yes, the character "Charlie Kirk" was removed from the world stage, but the actor who played him for a decade remains alive. I am still debating in my mind which was the more poorly-executed recent event of this type: the DJ Trump "attempted assassination" or the Charlie Kirk "assassination"?
Spot on! I wrote about trump too and pasted it in an earlier comment, but totally agree here — so many taught it was real which shows they don’t see reality as we do. Glad to meet others who do!
I never believe CNN but other news outlets reported the same thing, that he confessed to his father. along with a host of other evidence that points to the suspect.
Looks like this is where I part ways with the non-sense being shared here. P.S. - I do not recommend watching this... but if you still are believing any of the Conspiracy theories distracting you... This information was known and reported upon by this and other sources on 09/11/2025.... Stop lying - that is what you are doing when you do not know what you are talking about (I bet Charlie would not appreciate it and I Do Not appreciate it:
Looks like this is where I part ways with the non-sense being shared here. P.S. - I do not recommend watching this... but if you still are believing any of the Conspiracy theories distracting you... This information was known and reported upon by this and other sources on 09/11/2025.... Stop lying - that is what you are doing when you do not know what you are talking about (I bet Charlie would not appreciate it and I Do Not appreciate it:
Looks like this is where I part ways with the non-sense being shared here. P.S. - I do not recommend watching this... but if you still are believing any of the Conspiracy theories distracting you... This information was known and reported upon by this and other sources on 09/11/2025.... Stop lying - that is what you are doing when you do not know what you are talking about (I bet Charlie would not appreciate it and I Do Not appreciate it:
This is untrue. It's fragmented which happens to this round when it hits thick bone and so it's not that it's not the round, it just can't be proven by looking at it. You can bet your butt they already have that figured out which is why the defense filed this hail mary and all you folks who love to spill disinformation, spread it as gospel.
Thank you for your comment…. Posted the following for some of the ill informed positing here. If you have not already seen it; you may find it interesting:
Looks like this is where I part ways with the non-sense being shared here.
P.S. - I do not recommend watching this... but if you still are believing any of the Conspiracy theories distracting you... This information was known and reported upon by this and other sources on 09/11/2025.... Stop lying - that is what you are doing when you do not know what you are talking about (I bet Charlie would not appreciate it and I Do Not appreciate it:
Unless I misunderstood the expert opinion, it did not claim the bullet and rifle don't match, only that he couldn't confirm they did and I'm sure that's a big legal difference.
I'm sure we'll see more coming on this issue in the near future.
And just for the record; I too have trouble with the current legal allegations.
For instance; I have used 30-06 rifles for sixty years and can't imagine how the bullet, regardless of type would be recovered from the body.
Imo, the average human neck is not capable of resisting the full passage of a 30 calibre bullet launched from a 30-06 at 200 yds.
If the bullet was a '150 grain full metal jacket' type, I believe it would have punched a nice round hole straight through and ended up embedded in whatever was located behind and dense enough to stop it.
And if it was any one of the heavier hunting bullets with expanding tips, I am certain the impact of same would have resulted in 'considerably' greater tissue destruction.
You obviously don't know much about ballistics. Please stop spreading misinformation without understanding what you are doing. Several of your readers above noted the report said "inconclusive" only not what the tabloid is stating.
That was not what the ATF said ! What they said was the fragment could not be positively determined to have come from Robinson’s weapon but that it needs further testing !
Has anyone seen this so called ATF report. You’re relying on British tabloid as a reliable source. Given the past history of all MSM in being truthful I suggest you wait for the real report not some MSM with well known history of lying to sell papers and now clicks.
ALL I KNOW IS THAT A BI PARTISAN PRO COVID BIO WEAPON INJECTION DEPOPULATION PROGRAM WAS INSTITUTED , AND SINCE THEN I TRUST NOBODY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Looks like this is where I part ways with the non-sense being shared here. P.S. - I do not recommend watching this... but if you still are believing any of the Conspiracy theories distracting you... This information was known and reported upon by this and other sources on 09/11/2025.... Stop lying - that is what you are doing when you do not know what you are talking about (I bet Charlie would not appreciate it and I Do Not appreciate it:
"Doesn't Match" Tyler Robinson's .30-06 which? 1) bullet was too deformed to be tested for a match and barrel rifleing was suffiently intact so as it could be matched so the rifle could have fired the bullet or 2) barrel rifling was too worn or rusted to be matched to and bullet was suficently intact so as it could be matched to the barrel it was fired from so? or 3) bullet too deformed to be testable and barrel too damaged to be testable so no match was possible but rifle could have fired the bullet. or 4) both bullet was sufficiently intact so as to be linkable to the rifle it fired and barrel had sufficiently intact rifling so as to be matched to but the bullet did not match and thus was, in actuality, not fired from the rifle or?
Looks like this is where I part ways with the non-sense being shared here. P.S. - I do not recommend watching this... but if you still are believing any of the Conspiracy theories distracting you... This information was known and reported upon by this and other sources on 09/11/2025.... Stop lying - that is what you are doing when you do not know what you are talking about (I bet Charlie would not appreciate it and I Do Not appreciate it:
In a NON-word word......DUH!!!!
Because that kid did NOT SHOOT ANYONE!!
So why did he confess to his parents and minister? Why was he on the roof with a rifle? Why did he brag about doing it to his online friends. Sorry, but he did it and oddities about the bullet won’t change that.
WHY do you BELIEVE that what 'THEY' (the LYING 'govt') says is anywhere near the truth???
There was NO ONE on that roof; it was, CLEARLY, an 'AI' created video!
See the 'people' walking on the sidewalk, in the far right of the vid?.....they VANISH, while walking. And that 'jump from the roof'?......funny how that 'person' landed, on the ground, with NO problem.....not a fall, or a misstep.....nothing!.....a PERFECT 'landing'! (for a skinny/whimpy kid!)
The fake AF Kirk shooting:
https://rumble.com/v6zadbw-charlie-kirk-the-hologram.html?e9s=src_v1_s%2Csrc_v1_s_o&sci=cce4ec45-f213-4aab-b01d-96cddb502a7b
....was as fake as the fake AF Trump shooting.
https://old.bitchute.com/video/XyQfYhZO9mLT/
Kirk was killed. Just 100% NOT as 'THEY' say it happened.
Oh.....and lil Miss Erika was IN ON IT!
That demon-whore is a CIA/Iz-ra-HELLi asset.
"Kirk was killed"
Possibly.
Or Charlie is sitting on an unregistered Izraeli yacht drinking Margaritas with Epstein.
time for you to die
You are a nice chap
more dumb comments
Yes, yours are dumb, how prescient of you to notice
Wow…you’re crazy.
So, this is how you counter......with absolutely NOTHING??
Great argument (NOT!)!
Yes, this is how I counter speculation that can barely be labeled as such. You’re completely incoherent, you’re saying things like “a skinny/whimpy kid shouldn’t have been able to jump off a roof”, and that the video is AI. All before any evidence is presented at trial. And then you went on and on about trumps ear after he was shot, which is also bizarre. There’s a scar. It’s visible. Legacy news media, who hate trumps guts, also got a pic of the bullet as it clipped him. It’s absurd to say it didn’t happen.
When I say you’re crazy this is what I mean—your certainty that you’re right, before anywhere near the amount of data one would need to make that claim has able to be ascertained or understood, is pure insanity. You have completely lost the plot, and your “evidence” to the contrary is nonsensical AT BEST. Get a grip, it’s not that hard.
Hope that helps.
Legacy news media got a pic of the bullet you say? Oh well then - the whole thing can't possibly have been staged, can it?
I mean there are three possible scenarios:
1. The event was not staged and a cameraman just happened to be in the perfect position to capture the speeding bullet and was taking a picture at the precise time necessary.
2. The event was staged and a cameraman (the same one who captured a previous presidential assassination too as far as I remember) just happened to be in the perfect position to capture the speeding bullet and was taking a picture at the precise time necessary.
3. The event was staged and a photo was subsequently faked.
It's obvious to the meanest intellect that (1) is by far the most likely explanation here. Isn't it?
Oh - and by the way - the length of the streak in that pic doesn't match the reported rifle muzzle velocity and shutter speed of the camera. Perhaps those details were just misreported...
Dawnie, there are so many idiots walking around who believe everything the TV tells them, please don't waste your energy, maybe one day they'll wake up. Please try to be positive and happy, I do firmly believe there are demons amongst us, feeding off the chaos in the world and our negative energy.
100%!!
shut up dingbat. Go make a sandwich.
OK
I believe it now appears that he did not confess to his parents or the minister. That seems to have been more BS fabricated by the '33' club.
I read somewhere that all the things you mentioned were made up stories. This person did not kill Charlie Kirk …..Israel has a lot to answer for 😤
You read somewhere that what was true was made up … and you believed it. That’s the problem.
It’s the same for us all ….there is our individual perceptions and there is the truth ….and I prefer to not go with what the government are saying as it is almost always a lie 🥴
ATF guy is TDS full of sh*t. Ignorance is pervasive among the Left. The Gov't is totally infected. Democrats ARE the virus.
I know a really good therapist who helps people with such anger and hatred issues that you exhibit.
So ATF is lying . . . trying to protect Robinson? Why?
ATF is a worthless organization. Loaded with DEI libtards with IQs < 90. Half of them are anti-2A.
Understand all that, but their normal interest is in damning guns, not protecting furries. And as others have pointed out, they didn't say the 30-06 rifle was ruled out, just that it was not confirmed. Now apparently the FBI is doing its own testing, but their lab has a pretty bad record too.
Incorrect news
Incorrect news.
Wait till people find out about the Trump “assassination” attempt: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-trump-assassination-attempt
It was 100% FAKE; a WWF (wrestling) Show.
I'm STILL waiting for someone to show me the SCAR, from a (supposed) BULLET, on his EAR!!
I have a few (normal) ear piercings (2 of 5) that have long since closed up....and you can STILL SEE the 'tiny' (where there was once) holes!
Yet they want us to believe that a BULLET whizzed by/hit his ear, DRAWING BLOOD.....and there is NO SCAR?!
The scar is very clearly visible on Trump’s ear. Open your eyes.
NO; it is NOT!
The same people who think the fake Kirk shooting and the fake AF Trump shooting were real, probably believe Al Queda took down the world Trade Center.
Trump performed a jewish ritual in Butler, and all thought he was shot…
"Trump performed a jewish ritual in Butler"
Rabbi Isser Zalman Weisberg says President Trump is the non-Jewish Messiah, chosen to establish the Jewish Kingdom over all of mankind.
Weisberg draws a direct line from the bullet that grazed Trump’s ear to the Torah portion in Exodus 21:6, where a servant who wishes to remain with his master forever has his ear pierced against a doorpost with an awl. .
According to Weisberg, the failed assassination was a divine ritual. The bullet that nicked Trump’s ear was God’s awl, marking him as the Eved Hashem—the eternal servant of the Jewish people. “President Trump’s right ear was grazed in a symbolic gesture,” Weisberg argues, “where the Torah states that a servant who wants to remain with his master needs to have his right ear pierced”
Please shut your ignorant mouth. You are beyond dumb.
And you are super smart, well above US mean IQ of rank #33, below communist and third world countries, and you are entertaining. Here's some funny stuff you believe: The regime in Iran has changed, even though it's with more hardliners now in charge. The underground missile cities are completely destroyed. The US "won" even though it triggered a global fuel crisis for the rest of the world and Iran can still build a dirty bomb.
Your Dumbocrat is showing. Go away dingbat.
You dumb commie.
Looks like this is where I part ways with the non-sense being shared here. P.S. - I do not recommend watching this... but if you still are believing any of the Conspiracy theories distracting you... This information was known and reported upon by this and other sources on 09/11/2025.... Stop lying - that is what you are doing when you do not know what you are talking about (I bet Charlie would not appreciate it and I Do Not appreciate it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6zPjo5Vogc
CNN reported that the man confessed to his father, who in turn notified the police.
Incorrect news.
where is the replay of this incident ….The walk to the building dressed in pants, to coming off the roof in shorts after the shooting?
I read he changed clothes, but did he throw the weapon off the roof or have time to disassemble it then hide it and his other clothes in his shorts?
I didn’t see the weapon when he came off the building, but it was reported he left it on the ground in the grass under some trees on his way out of the area. What did I miss?
In which case the truth is unknowable, when facts are deniable. That is a position of chaos and injustice. NO ONE is trustworthy? We must re-establish truthfulness in ourselves, our media, our government officials, and eliminate liars, cheaters and corruption. Transparency might be the key but in addition a greater dedication to telling the truth without reference to our own personal biases.
1. A Trans kid wouldn't take a fall for Trumps's government
2. The story they told about locations completely indicts Charlie's security team because they would have seen him clearly from the stage.
3. He assembled, disassembled, ran from the scene through the woods, re-assembled the weapon and left it in plain site for someone to find. Some experts have said that the particular weapon wasn't even made for rapid disassembly.
4. There has been total silence of the investigation and where it was leading the investigators, now many months later we are hearing that the bullet isn't consistent with the gun?
5. It WOULD make sense that the Trans movement would put him up to this, but very much like the Trump attempted assassination, the planning, timing, positioning and escape plan were very clunky.
6. Erika decided before he was even convicted that Tyler had done it because she felt the need to publicly forgive him. She is a smart woman, what could she have been told, and by whom, that would convince her of his guilt, or was it really Tyler she was forgiving?
7. What could Charlie have unleashed by refusing to meet with Bibi that would have been worth killing him for? What has caused Candace to go so off the rails?
8. I guess the big question is...Who had something to gain, or was this simply a hate crime by the radical left?
A shame to see people hollering "dumb" at each other. The government has released very little info, and some of it, maybe a lot, is either wrong or makes no sense. But to respond to just one of your points, #7. Why kill Kirk?
Have you seen the hatred being directed at Tucker Carlson and Joe Kent by Israel firsters like Dershowitz, who used terms like "neo-Nazi fascist movement" and "an ideological coup attempt"? If Kirk were alive, he'd be getting the same treatment, as he spent two days at the White House last summer begging officials, including his friend Trump, not to destroy the administration by attacking Iran. Kirk is also on video stating that Israel likely stood down to allow Hamas' 10/7/2023 attack. And his texts in the two days before his murder said he was forced by donor bullying to break with Israel and that he feared he might be killed for doing so. Have you seen Netanyahu go on TV three separate times to declare Israel didn't do it, Charlie was their greatest friend (maybe true at one time, but not in the months before he was assassinated)? So motive? How about stopping someone from influencing Trump not to start a war Israel believed was existential?
With regard to Candace, she's been right about most everything due to having worked at TP/USA and having contacts there. Without her, we might not know about Kirk's texts or that there was no exit wound (TP/USA let her see the video from behind Charlie, and she recorded it). If you haven't seen it, go back and watch her first video after the murder, about a week later. It was a very moving, humanizing tribute to Charlie with lots of video of the two of them and other TP/USA people on road trips similar to the one to UVA (before the Gulfstream 5!), singing in the car, dancing, setting up displays. At the time I saw that video, I'd heard Kirk's name, but knew nothing about him.
UB Dumb. TDS dumb.
Looks like this is where I part ways with the non-sense being shared here. P.S. - I do not recommend watching this... but if you still are believing any of the Conspiracy theories distracting you... This information was known and reported upon by this and other sources on 09/11/2025.... Stop lying - that is what you are doing when you do not know what you are talking about (I bet Charlie would not appreciate it and I Do Not appreciate it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6zPjo5Vogc
Easy to say, but hard to prove.
The report says, "unable to identify." The report doesn't say anything about whether it matched the gun or not, does it? "Not matching" and "unable to identify" are two different things, or am I missing something?
Exactly! No matter the source or indent, I hate misleading headlines.
I thought the same thing about "unable to identify", especially since I earlier considered the lack of exit wound AND the immediate kill might have been the result of a "hollow point" bullet. Perhaps the way that type of bullet splits/flares on impact is why the FBI is "unable' to match it. (?)
Exactly. Well said. Unable to identify does not mean it doesn’t match. It probably means the bullet was so fragmented there weren’t large enough pieces for a positive id. Pretty simple actually.
Exploding mic, and you know who did it
Looks like this is where I part ways with the non-sense being shared here. P.S. - I do not recommend watching this... but if you still are believing any of the Conspiracy theories distracting you... This information was known and reported upon by this and other sources on 09/11/2025.... Stop lying - that is what you are doing when you do not know what you are talking about (I bet Charlie would not appreciate it and I Do Not appreciate it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6zPjo5Vogc
The defense quoted the ATF as stating they were “unable to identify” the bullet fragment to the rifle. “unable to identify” does not mean “ruled out.” Experts emphasize that inconclusive results are common when bullets fragment or pass through bone.
I called out the Kirk incident as fake almost immediately and wrote a lot of articles on it. Seeing that the bullets don’t match is another case study to add to my argument: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-charlie-kirk-event-a-complete
Me too, F O'K. A classic Jesuit/Zionist/Freemasonic/and in this case Mormon mass trauma/ritual sacrifice/psyop/by the numbers event, designed to mislead the despised human cattle. It astonished me how many "alternative media" folk appeared to fall for it, including even the Ickes, 21 Wire and CJ Bjerknes! Discernment needed, folks! FFS, yes, the character "Charlie Kirk" was removed from the world stage, but the actor who played him for a decade remains alive. I am still debating in my mind which was the more poorly-executed recent event of this type: the DJ Trump "attempted assassination" or the Charlie Kirk "assassination"?
Spot on! I wrote about trump too and pasted it in an earlier comment, but totally agree here — so many taught it was real which shows they don’t see reality as we do. Glad to meet others who do!
Likewise Franklin. Keep up your good work!
CNN reported that the man confessed to his father, who in turn notified the police.
Gotta be true in that case!
I never believe CNN but other news outlets reported the same thing, that he confessed to his father. along with a host of other evidence that points to the suspect.
Looks like this is where I part ways with the non-sense being shared here. P.S. - I do not recommend watching this... but if you still are believing any of the Conspiracy theories distracting you... This information was known and reported upon by this and other sources on 09/11/2025.... Stop lying - that is what you are doing when you do not know what you are talking about (I bet Charlie would not appreciate it and I Do Not appreciate it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6zPjo5Vogc
Another gun,from the vantage point you identified earlier. 30.06 should have taken his head off from such a close distance
I concur
With out doubt
Looks like this is where I part ways with the non-sense being shared here. P.S. - I do not recommend watching this... but if you still are believing any of the Conspiracy theories distracting you... This information was known and reported upon by this and other sources on 09/11/2025.... Stop lying - that is what you are doing when you do not know what you are talking about (I bet Charlie would not appreciate it and I Do Not appreciate it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6zPjo5Vogc
Absolutely. Thank you for this common sense.
Looks like this is where I part ways with the non-sense being shared here. P.S. - I do not recommend watching this... but if you still are believing any of the Conspiracy theories distracting you... This information was known and reported upon by this and other sources on 09/11/2025.... Stop lying - that is what you are doing when you do not know what you are talking about (I bet Charlie would not appreciate it and I Do Not appreciate it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6zPjo5Vogc
This is untrue. It's fragmented which happens to this round when it hits thick bone and so it's not that it's not the round, it just can't be proven by looking at it. You can bet your butt they already have that figured out which is why the defense filed this hail mary and all you folks who love to spill disinformation, spread it as gospel.
Thank you for your comment…. Posted the following for some of the ill informed positing here. If you have not already seen it; you may find it interesting:
Looks like this is where I part ways with the non-sense being shared here.
P.S. - I do not recommend watching this... but if you still are believing any of the Conspiracy theories distracting you... This information was known and reported upon by this and other sources on 09/11/2025.... Stop lying - that is what you are doing when you do not know what you are talking about (I bet Charlie would not appreciate it and I Do Not appreciate it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6zPjo5Vogc
Unless I misunderstood the expert opinion, it did not claim the bullet and rifle don't match, only that he couldn't confirm they did and I'm sure that's a big legal difference.
I'm sure we'll see more coming on this issue in the near future.
And just for the record; I too have trouble with the current legal allegations.
For instance; I have used 30-06 rifles for sixty years and can't imagine how the bullet, regardless of type would be recovered from the body.
Imo, the average human neck is not capable of resisting the full passage of a 30 calibre bullet launched from a 30-06 at 200 yds.
If the bullet was a '150 grain full metal jacket' type, I believe it would have punched a nice round hole straight through and ended up embedded in whatever was located behind and dense enough to stop it.
And if it was any one of the heavier hunting bullets with expanding tips, I am certain the impact of same would have resulted in 'considerably' greater tissue destruction.
You obviously don't know much about ballistics. Please stop spreading misinformation without understanding what you are doing. Several of your readers above noted the report said "inconclusive" only not what the tabloid is stating.
That was not what the ATF said ! What they said was the fragment could not be positively determined to have come from Robinson’s weapon but that it needs further testing !
Has anyone seen this so called ATF report. You’re relying on British tabloid as a reliable source. Given the past history of all MSM in being truthful I suggest you wait for the real report not some MSM with well known history of lying to sell papers and now clicks.
ALL I KNOW IS THAT A BI PARTISAN PRO COVID BIO WEAPON INJECTION DEPOPULATION PROGRAM WAS INSTITUTED , AND SINCE THEN I TRUST NOBODY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I trust many, but not most in Goverment, certainly not the FBI, CIA, Lindsey Graham and Susie Wiles.
It’s an absolute joke.
I saw the flashback come from the back right.
I saw the bullet pass through his body after it came out the front left of his neck
It was a regular size bullet at 30-06 would have decapitated him essentially
This is one of the least believable lies of the government has ever told us.
Charlie also fell off the left side of his chair. Tyler is a paid Patsy.
The shooter was inside the building firing the shot
Karma will come, but we may not know the shooter for many years
Looks like this is where I part ways with the non-sense being shared here. P.S. - I do not recommend watching this... but if you still are believing any of the Conspiracy theories distracting you... This information was known and reported upon by this and other sources on 09/11/2025.... Stop lying - that is what you are doing when you do not know what you are talking about (I bet Charlie would not appreciate it and I Do Not appreciate it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6zPjo5Vogc
Toldya. You thought they had ID'd the rifle. They hadn't.
"Doesn't Match" Tyler Robinson's .30-06 which? 1) bullet was too deformed to be tested for a match and barrel rifleing was suffiently intact so as it could be matched so the rifle could have fired the bullet or 2) barrel rifling was too worn or rusted to be matched to and bullet was suficently intact so as it could be matched to the barrel it was fired from so? or 3) bullet too deformed to be testable and barrel too damaged to be testable so no match was possible but rifle could have fired the bullet. or 4) both bullet was sufficiently intact so as to be linkable to the rifle it fired and barrel had sufficiently intact rifling so as to be matched to but the bullet did not match and thus was, in actuality, not fired from the rifle or?
30-06 would have done much more damage and the holistic experts know this. A patsy aye, never seen that before.
Looks like this is where I part ways with the non-sense being shared here. P.S. - I do not recommend watching this... but if you still are believing any of the Conspiracy theories distracting you... This information was known and reported upon by this and other sources on 09/11/2025.... Stop lying - that is what you are doing when you do not know what you are talking about (I bet Charlie would not appreciate it and I Do Not appreciate it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6zPjo5Vogc
Untrue. This is exactly what happens with this round. Might want to read up on MLK JR and ballistics for that too.
https://youtu.be/dORI817YGzs?si=LwMnK3c8rBskOq0M
I did read the experts on the 30-06.