18 Comments
User's avatar
Inisfad's avatar

Even to this day, it is only alternative media that even broaches the subject of ‘turbo cancer’, regarding Biden’s issue. Instead the attention moves toward a PSA test not being done, or some other issue with Biden’s testing care. It’s time that the issue of turbo cancer becomes part of the discussion.

Expand full comment
Corrin Strong's avatar

The fact that Biden may have taken a real vaccine and not a placebo, proves his senility!

Expand full comment
Inisfad's avatar

Hopefully dr.McCullough’s interview with the Senate on 5/21 will be on the internet for us to view. And hopefully the discussion of turbo cancer will be part of that discussion.

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

Also, Laura Kasner tells me Dr. McCullough was going to mention the "embalmers' clots," which would be the first time this has happened before a hearing of elected representatives and at an event that could be viewed by large numbers of people.

Tom Haviland attended and was going to show vials of the actual clots from the audience, per Laura.

Expand full comment
Laura's avatar

Thank you both! Such a hideous lie we were all told🙏🙏🙏Blessings

Expand full comment
Decision Junction's avatar

At Neo7Bioscience, we are clearly observing rapid acceleration of cancer post-mRNA vaccination.

Expand full comment
Hillary Anderson's avatar

Hi John. The interview Dr.McCullough did with you is an absolute MUST watch. I am sending it to my oncologist I hope she will watch it. When I brought up the role of the shots with the increase in cancers she said. “I know that isn’t true because I have patients with cancer that didn’t get the shots”. The idiocy of that comment was flabbergasting! The work you are doing is amazing and very important!

Expand full comment
Decision Junction's avatar

Hilliary keep me posted!

Expand full comment
Woody's avatar

A recent discovery is that CT diagnostics have been linked to higher rates of cancer. Your oncologist might have missed or forgotten the statistics class which teaches students how not all cases are correlated to a specific cause.

From a high-level perspective in medicine, determining the **causation of a disease** involves understanding several key components. These are often framed within **epidemiological** and **biomedical** models. The major components include:

---

### 1. **Agent**

* The direct cause of the disease (e.g., bacteria, virus, toxin, gene mutation).

* In infectious diseases, this is often a **pathogen**.

* In non-infectious diseases, it could be a **chemical**, **radiation**, **genetic mutation**, etc.

### 2. **Host**

* The individual who develops the disease.

* Host factors include:

* **Genetics**

* **Immune status**

* **Age**

* **Sex**

* **Nutrition**

* **Comorbid conditions**

### 3. **Environment**

* External factors that influence the interaction between host and agent.

* Includes:

* **Physical environment** (climate, pollution)

* **Social environment** (living conditions, access to healthcare)

* **Behavioral factors** (smoking, diet, hygiene)

This triad (Agent-Host-Environment) is a foundational model in **epidemiology**.

---

### 4. **Time**

* Timing of exposure (e.g., early life vs adulthood)

* Duration and intensity of exposure

* Disease latency and incubation periods

---

### 5. **Causal Inference Criteria (Bradford Hill Criteria)**

When direct experimentation isn't possible, these criteria help evaluate causality in observational data:

* **Strength of association**

* **Consistency**

* **Specificity**

* **Temporality** (cause precedes effect)

* **Biological gradient** (dose-response relationship)

* **Plausibility**

* **Coherence**

* **Experiment**

* **Analogy**

---

### 6. **Genetic and Epigenetic Factors**

* Inherited mutations (e.g., BRCA1/2 for breast cancer)

* Epigenetic modifications from environmental exposures

---

### 7. **Multifactorial Causation**

* Many diseases (e.g., diabetes, heart disease, cancer) result from **interactions among multiple factors**, not a single cause.

Expand full comment
Mary's avatar

I’m not understanding why Dr. McCullough said there was not a PSA done in 2024 and all of a sudden he is a Gleason Stage 9 and he doesn’t think something was either hidden or overlooked.

Expand full comment
Sue Psomiadis's avatar

Dr McCullough, can people with Myocarditis benefit from your spike protein detox ? And also people who’ve taken many covid shots and boosters through 2023?

Expand full comment
David Brown's avatar

It has been known for some time that adipose tissue arachidonic acid correlates with cancer progression. An 'adipose tissue arachidonic acid' web search brings up a 2012 article entitled 'Arachidonic acid metabolism in human prostate cancer'. Excerpts from the abstract: "The arachidonic acid pathway is important in the development and progression of numerous malignant diseases, including prostate cancer...Our results suggest that LOX metabolites such as 12-HETE are critical in prostate cancer progression and that the LOX pathway may be a target for treating and preventing prostate cancer."

A 2021 article entitled 'Prostate Cancer Progression: as a Matter of Fats' says, "Advanced prostate cancer (PCa) represents the fifth cause of cancer death worldwide. Although survival has improved with second-generation androgen signaling and Parp inhibitors, the benefits are not long-lasting, and new therapeutic approaches are sorely needed...Despite the well-known association between obesity with PCa lethality, the underlying mechanistic role of diet/obesity-derived metabolites has only lately been unveiled. Furthermore, the role of lipids as energy source, building blocks, and signaling molecules in cancer cells has now been revisited and expanded in the context of the tumor microenvironment (TME), which is heavily influenced by the external environment and nutrient availability. Here, we describe how lipids, their enzymes, transporters, and modulators can promote PCa development and progression, and we emphasize the role of lipids in shaping TME. In a therapeutic perspective, we describe the ongoing efforts in targeting lipogenic hubs. Finally, we highlight studies supporting dietary modulation in the adjuvant setting with the purpose of achieving greater efficacy of the standard of care and of synthetic lethality. PCa progression is “a matter of fats”, and the more we understand about the role of lipids as key players in this process, the better we can develop approaches to counteract their tumor promoter activity while preserving their beneficial properties." At the end of the article the authors said, "In the imminent future we anticipate the integration of MALDI-MSI, spatial transcriptomics, and digital pathology will further advance our current understanding of the biology of lipids in PCa progression and will offer opportunities for the identification of new druggable targets."

Notice that the emphasis is on treatment, not prevention through dietary modification.

One notable dietary modification that consistently produces favorable results across a wide spectrum of disease conditions is the so-called Mediterranean diet. A 2025 article entitled 'The Impact of Diet and Nutrition on Prostate Cancer – Food for Thought?' said, "Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet, which is rich in fruits, vegetables, olive oil, fish and omega-3 fatty acids, was shown to be associated with a great reduction in prostate cancer risk." In a 2019 blog post entitled 'New red meat study controversy' Steve Blechman explains why the Mediterrenean approach improves health outcomes. "The Mediterranean diet is low in arachidonic acid and rich in healthy fats such as monounsaturated fats found in extra-virgin olive oil (EVOO), nuts and omega-3 fatty acids from fish, which has been shown to lower the risk of inflammation, heart disease, cancer, diabetes and obesity, and other degenerative diseases." (web search - Stave Blechman New red meat study)

So, here's the reason why scientists cannot figure out what nutrient is causing so much ill health. (1996) "Excessive signaling of arachidonic acid (AA) metabolites has been associated with various chronic degenerative or autoimmune diseases, and intervention with the metabolism of AA is widely employed therapeutically in these afflictions. In essence, AA is the most biologically active unsaturated fatty acid in higher animals. Its concentration in membranes and its magnitude of effects depend on its amount, or that of its precursors and analogues, in the diet. The tendency of the field of nutrition to ignore the role of dietary AA will optimistically be reversed in the future." The article also said, "The underlying rationale for this symposium is that dietary AA is perhaps the single most important nutritional determinant in regulating AA levels in Americans. This may ultimately account in part for the striking differences in chronic diseases between strict vegetarians and the bulk of the omnivorous population." (web search - Biological Effects of Arachidonic Acid: Introduction)

Well, the future has arrived and the field of nutrition continues to ignore arachidonic acid research findings.

Expand full comment
Sue Psomiadis's avatar

This may be valuable research but Biden is a thin man. Excess Adipose is not an issue for him. It’s going to be definitively determined and widely accepted soon enough that covid vaccines are the cause of turbo cancers and reoccurrences in long term remission patients.

Not until our next generation and those who did not take covid vaccines have lived out their lives will we rid our population of the scourge of disease and death caused by covid vaccines! Kudos to Dr McCullough for fighting for real science and exposing the coverup by our gov’t and fraud of big pharma.

Expand full comment
David Brown's avatar

Wikipedia says, "Turbo cancer is an anti-vaccination conspiracy theory alleging that people vaccinated against COVID-19, especially with mRNA vaccines, are suffering from a high incidence of fast-developing cancers. Although the idea has been spread by a number of vaccine opponents, including several health professionals, turbo cancer is not supported by cancer research, and there is no evidence that COVID-19 vaccination causes or worsens cancer."

While it may turn out that covid vaccines accelerate prostate cancer progression, cancers of various types are not caused by obesity. If that were true, only obese people would develop cancer. Cancers stem from excess intake of arachidonic acid which accumulates in adipose tissue over the course of a lifetime in lean and obese individuals. Healthy obese people do not have an excess of linoleic acid or arachidonic acid in their adipose tissue. (web search - Vijay P. Singh saturated fat)

So Sue, if you are a scientifically curious person, I suggest you do these web searches.

adipose tissue arachidonic acid prostate cancer

adipose tissue arachidonic acid breast cancer

adipose tissue arachidonic acid colorectal cancer

adipose tissue arachidonic acid heart disease

adipose tissue arachidonic acid metabolic syndrome

adipose tissue arachidonic acid fatty liver disease

adipose tissue arachidonic acid kidney disease

adipose tissue arachidonic acid autism

adipose tissue arachidonic acid depression

adipose tissue arachidonic acid anxiety

W. Edwards Deming said, “In God we trust. All others must bring data."

If a turbo cancer/vaccination relationship has been established, I would like to see the data. Meanwhile, everyone who aspires to be healthy would do well to learn how to avoid consuming an excess of linoleic acid and arachidonic acid. (web search - Hulbert The under-appreciated fats of life)

Expand full comment
Sue Psomiadis's avatar

Wikipedia… homestly?!

Expand full comment
David Brown's avatar

Did you do the web searches? Can you cite data that establishes a turbo cancer/vaccination relationship?

Expand full comment