23 Comments
User's avatar
Dr. Kevin Stillwagon's avatar

Thank you for publishing the full audio recording along with the time-stamped transcript. This level of transparency sets a high standard for accuracy and integrity in public discourse. Providing full context ensures your words can’t be misrepresented, and it’s an approach I hope more writers and journalists will adopt.

Expand full comment
Michael Waldmeier DMD, PhD's avatar

What an earthquake that a reporter from Bloomberg took the time and effort to get an real update!

Expand full comment
Michael Waldmeier DMD, PhD's avatar

What we don't know is why she did what she did, when the decision was made, and who made the decision with/for her.

Expand full comment
Mora Fields's avatar

Brilliant idea to publish the audio before the article comes out. Looking forward to the comparison.

Expand full comment
KFH's avatar

That Bloomberg reporter uses the guttural and hugely annoying/condescending vocal construct that puts my sense of skepticism/danger into overdrive. Dr M did a fine and careful job with his answers which could still be contorted for Bloomberg’s nefarious aims.

Expand full comment
Thomas Curry's avatar

Dr. McCullough, you never disappoint.... with your calm demeanor, frequent references to published studies to back up your observations and command of vaccine science. I'm personally optimistic that if we stay on task with some of these prospective studies that progress will be made during these 4 years to getting closer to solving the true causes of autism.

Expand full comment
Sinequa Nan's avatar

Thanks, Dr. McCullough, for modeling open-minded dialog despite how very unfairly you've been treated over the past several years. IF we are to move ahead as a country, this sort of approach is absolutely necessary. I appreciate your modeling *rational, informed, evidence-this. Keep up the excellent, inspirational work!

Expand full comment
Allie's avatar

Fever reducing plan for a pregnant woman: determine what degree of fever is associated with a significant risk of seizure, manage the fever with physical methods, such as cool compresses and hydrating with cool water. Use acetaminophen only if these physical methods are not effective in keeping the body temperature below a predetermined degree. Most importantly, don’t “vaccinate” a pregnant woman.

Expand full comment
DaughteroftheKing's avatar

FANTASTIC job, Dr. McCullough! GOD BLESS YOU for TIRELESSLY continuing to speak TRUTH gently, respectfully, accurately and at the same time...POWERFULLY!

Expand full comment
CB's avatar

Time will tell, but I'm skeptical Bloomberg will be fair. Bloomberg personally has given huge amounts of money to Johns Hopkins and other (especially DEI) med schools and his anti-gun organization was heavily involved in the fraudulent "auction" purchase of Infowars (later thrown out by the judge) by The Onion. Beyond the political, Wall Street loves drug stocks, many of which were up significantly last week after Trump announced his TrumpRx "deal" with Pfizer. Pfizer's stock is almost up to where it was before Pfizer's Covid money pump, though still down almost 50% from its 2021 peak.

Expand full comment
Elwood R. Bernat's avatar

Will she take your comments, plug them in to AI, and then give us her opinion based on AI’s conclusions, write Dr. Mac’s opine’s with all do respect, or write her opinion based on conflicting opinion from the medical hierarchy.

I see two problems for patients. One is that academia and sister medicine have since Aristotle’s academy worked diligently to maintain a sense of hierarchy for their own protection. An example is that the CDC has been championed as the premier go to for medical advice. Following CDC recommendations is the best free insurance against malpractice a professional can have (plausible deniability), “the CDC made me do it”.

Those who have insidiously and systematically gained control of the institutions, including academia and medicine now have weaponized the data sanctified by AI.

All that is left to do is weaponize MSM messaging, both of whom have voted and donated 92% Democrat. Where is the dissent, peer review, or science in that equation?

We will soon see a systemic media process that does not even bother with dissenting opinions from peers

The second is that with the advent of accepted AI as academia and medicine do not need to be concerned with responsibility, nor do the CDC, NIH, or the WHO, once it is accepted that AI is our new one size fits all Godly opinion, and considering the rise in acceptance of eugenics and euthanasia, (X) number of collateral damage is expanding as population grows as does the accepted insensitivity to collateral damage one sees in countries like China and India.

Simply put, collusion between academia/burgeoning bureaucracy, corporate medicine, and Wall Street investors want clean simple codifying of AI opinion that has already intentionally poo-pooed the opinion of America and the worlds greatest doctors that have been in practice for decades and are the most peer reviewed, and yet in light of AI’s opinion, the good doctors opinion is now secondary.

Aristotles hierarchal academies set up for their own protection from ruling deity have finally jumped the shark 2,300 years later by selling it’s science and souls to “higher artificial intelligence”, and a culture of statically satisfiable death and demise.

Expand full comment
James Kuhlenschmidt's avatar

Don’t forget the medical journals that are captured by Big Pharma and the crony peer review process. Great comment. Only heroes like Dr McCullough can out this corrupted industry with his knowledge, experience, and integrity.

Expand full comment
Richard Cabot's avatar

You should read Alex Beronson's and Dr. Malone's posts about being interviewed. They ask lots of questions and then selectively publish portions of the answers, always distorting what's been said.

Expand full comment
Allison Gilliland's avatar

Same thing happened to Alex Berenson recently, and his time and energy were for naught. Hope it’s different for Dr M.

Expand full comment
Coleen Rowley's avatar

If only the "Powers-That-Shouldn't-Be" would turn back from their health profiteering to actually "follow the science!" It's a frustratingly slow plod, if it even happens. Unfortunately their profiteering has even tarnished the word "science." But THANKS for all of your efforts, Doctor!

Expand full comment
Barbara Charis's avatar

Follow what Science? Who provides the Science? For what reasons is a Science promoted? Today, my substack is: Is there a Science of Nutrition? When 95% of illness is created by what goes in the mouth...and nutrition is not emphasized in med schools...I would like to know why? If doctors had followed the teachings of Hippocrates...people would rarely get ill. However, the money factor came into play back in 1910. It changed the course of history.

Expand full comment
Lawyerlisa's avatar

Great call. Your knowledgeon the topics was exceptionaland you appear balanced ..

My view?. Rermove the 1986 liability shield. Then the wheat and chaff would be sorted awfully fast.

By keeping it in place the successive administrations act as co-conspirator to any harm imposed on children and their families. If you were the enemy of the state you could conduct kinetic slow order warfare where children are the infantry sent to fight the globalist order, who intend on owning the formerly western value nations.

The cdc and fda are now so propatent holder it is hard to know where one starts and the other begins. But you can notice the funding is by globalist proponents.

It is an orgy that simultaneously creates a child sacrifice pipeline. Spiritually i see it as quite demonic.

The 70B Pfizer funding is ominous.

Expand full comment
Randall Stoehr's avatar

I don't like to offer such a negative view but she said "Um or Ah" a thousand times.

The sound audio quality was just as bad. Echo tin can modulation makes hearing it poor.

Expand full comment
Scott's avatar

Totally sad that you have to carry out such measures.

They could ask their favorite AI for a list of countries that used ivermectin and had a death rate lower than the USA but, fake news.

Expand full comment