152 Comments
User's avatar
MBP's avatar
Apr 8Edited

I don't think governments will EVER concede to the damage they inflicted because the liability would be insurmountable.

Expand full comment
DUANE HAYES's avatar

In a just world, the thousands of family members of the deceased and injured, along with like minded people who are for justice, should have a millions of people march on Washington, a serious protest and demand for the end of the clot shots and justice for all the victims.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Barnett's avatar

Trust me friend if I had a car I'd be there! I spent over a decade working with Developmentally Disabled adults, most loving non judgemental group ever. To take them to "Dr" appts and they would be put on any and every new pill available. Safety Studies on how this 1 pill will react with the other 5,6,8 pills or patches they were already on. I had no voice. Most of my "guys" spent most of their lives in the State Hospitals,their "guardians" were a rubber stamp. Sorry for going on, but thank you for allowing me to tell this part of my journeys story God Bless

Expand full comment
John K's avatar

Especially if the masses wake up to the fact governments and pharma knew all along how dangerous the shots were. Even with the mountains of evidence of harm, they still have the arrogance to push the shots. Unbelievable, unless you understand that they are really trying to kill us.

Expand full comment
Peter Zachos's avatar

But the virus actually killed a huge number of people. It was far more effective at ending lives than this study demonstrates the vaccines to be. So if the gov really wanted to kill us, why not just downplay the pandemic and allow more infections, which would result in far more deaths?

Expand full comment
John K's avatar

I have to differ with you on that. The virus, properly treated in early stages, was no worse than a typical flu. What killed people, was not the virus, it was going to the hospital. The COVID hospital protocols almost guaranteed death. Remdesivir causes kidney failure, the ventilators destroyed the lungs, and just in case anyone survived that torture, they withheld fluids and nutrition so you had no strength to fight the infection or the murderers in white coats. Of course they kept all family away so there was no one who cared about you in a position to help.

They are in fact trying to kill us but also transferring huge amounts of wealth from us to the so-called elites. CV was probably the greatest transfer of wealth in human history. They are also conditioning us to comply with ridiculous commands like masks, social distancing and isolation. They admit now that none of that worked, it was just to stoke up fear so people would make bad decisions like taking the jab. One other benefit was turning us against each other so we would not see the real enemy. Amazing how many people fell for it.

Expand full comment
FollowsTheWay's avatar

There was no pandemic.

Expand full comment
tRuth's avatar

Plandemic! Propaganda induced fear and compliance. The plan has been ongoing for decades, remove everyone from natural surroundings, earthing, desensitisation through frequencies, (TV, radio, phones, computers and engineered music, plus all the alleged required technology seen, as well as unseen, infrastructure); along with all food and pHarma toxic ingredients, altering the minds of would be good men, women and children. On top of which, we have weather manipulation to burden all bio-life.

Expand full comment
Peter Zachos's avatar

Great! Thanks for the report from your planet.

Expand full comment
anacara's avatar

Research, for example, the massive spike in deaths in British nursing homes in April 2020. They were literally murdering them with midazolam, in ordee to ramp up numbers and hence the fear.

Expand full comment
Peter Zachos's avatar

>> "Research, for example, the massive spike in deaths in British nursing homes in April 2020"

Okay. That tracks precisely with the epidemiological studies on the Covid-19 virus and the disease it caused. Fatality rate increases correlated directly with age, with the elderly dying at the highest rates, due to the same factors that cause the elderly to die at the highest rates from seasonal flu: compromised immune systems and greater incidence of comorbidity. Thank you for providing another data set that bolsters this.

>>"They were literally murdering them with midazolam, in ordee to ramp up numbers and hence the fear."

Wow, a claim of mass murder and genocide on a large, systemic scale. Have any concrete, testable, falsifiable evidence to support this enormous accusation?

The upper age ranges who contracted Covid died at a far higher rate than younger age ranges; this held true in all parts of the globe, in all territories, even in those where midazolam was unavailable or not administered. It was even higher in areas of close quarters, such as senior centers and nursing homes, where a virus with extremely high communicability can transfer much more easily. This also holds true for seasonal flu, norovirus, and many other infectious diseases (it held true to catastrophic levels with smallpox when that was still in play; it's since been eradicated.)

You have to control for other explanations before settling for one wacky conspiracy theory, but who are we kidding? You don't and won't. That takes work.

Expand full comment
anacara's avatar

Anyone familiar with the egregious Liverpool Care Pathway could have guessed what was going on at the time, as I did. Since then, plenty of evidence has emerged on midazolam usage in the UK in April 2020, as well as the excessive amounts bought by the UK in the previous year (I think from France). I don't remember where the documentation can be found and I am far too busy a person to look for you, but you should be able to glean details and sources from here: https://www.ukcolumn.org/event/the-midazolam-murders-exposing-state-sanctioned-involuntary-euthanasia

You strike me as someone who will not think based on observations, however, and will simply believe the narratives spun by authority, in one way or another.

Expand full comment
Peter Zachos's avatar

Ah, a video. Ok good. Before I spend two and a half hours of my life chasing your theories down the rabbit hole because you’re too lazy to provide the evidence I and so many others have asked of you, please tell me: does the bulk of the running time of this video involve the LCP protocol as used prior to its phase-out in 2014, or its specific use during the Covid pandemic in 2020? Also, does the video distinguish between the complete LCP protocol versus the simple and common administration of midazolam as part of an end-care regiment? Does this video chronicle the specific changes that were made to the application post-2014 and how those changes would nullify attempts to thwart patients or their family’s wishes? Does the video provide conclusive, verified, testable, and falsifiable evidence that nurses intended to use midazolam on Covid patients to kill them prematurely so that they could mark their death as a Covid death and thereby increase the fatality rates? (After all, that’s your overriding claim.) Does the video provide data from control studies outlining the unintended fatality rates from common usage of midazolam on non-Covid patients during end-of-life care, AND a separate control study on unintended fatality rates from usage of midazolam on Covid patients who are not receiving end-of-life care? How about one simply on Covid death rates in senior and elder care facilities in the UK in general? We need these control numbers to better arm ourselves against biased data. Does the video provide conclusive, traceable, documented evidence that the UK bought “excessive” amounts of midazolam from France? Does the video explain why that fact, if true, would be far more nefarious than the UK simply producing and stockpiling more of its own midazolam for whatever purpose? Does the video define what “excessive” means and how it arrived at the measurement given the circumstances?

If the answer to all these questions is “yes”, I’ll watch the video. Otherwise it’s simply a waste of time and an excuse to sidestep proper critical analysis. “Observation” is only the first step, anacara.

Expand full comment
Viking's avatar

So called Peter Zachos = government bot!

Expand full comment
tRuth's avatar

Amazing how these entities, even begin to post their own delusional requests.

Then afterall, what more do we anticipate these days from social media, am umbrella term that SubStack is under. Another de-platformed channel, courtesy of U.K. gov.

Stay real Viking; we need warriors like you on side. 🙏

Expand full comment
Nicole Kortis's avatar

They labeled a pancake suicide as a Covid death. How could they even have swabbed a corpse that’s a pancake? They labeled a cancer death with a trach complication as a Covid death. I was hospitalized for an emergency hysterectomy and they labeled me a Covid hospitalization. Do you not see the trend? I’m very sorry that you’re so misinformed but Covid was a scam and didn’t kill people like you think. The flu magically went away??!! 🤦🏼‍♀️🤦🏼‍♀️ cmon my friend. Use some critical thinking here please. And God bless you.

Expand full comment
Peter Zachos's avatar

Well, a slight correction there, Nicole: i am not "misinformed." I am UNinformed, because you and most other conspiracy theorists haven't provided any actual information. You only make claims and accusations. Reality requires a higher standard than that, irrespective of you or me or anyone else.

Expand full comment
Nicole Kortis's avatar

The cases I reported are factual. The pancake was my friend’s ambulance call as a paramedic. The trach case was another friend’s father. My health records are factual. My statement most specifically about myself is irrefutable. If you want to argue that then you are delusional. I just proved how they faked the numbers in my own personal case and 2 others. Your choice to be in disbelief.

Expand full comment
Peter Zachos's avatar

Thanks. Show your work. Personal anecdotes are not data.

Expand full comment
Mike Jones's avatar

Peter, I was tracking data in Oregon and in all of their stats on OHA, they stated that Covid death was defined as 1) Someone who has died of any cause with a positive covid test in the past 60 days.

2) Anyone to have reported covid like symptoms any time with in the past 60 days.

They inflated the numbers because of the monetary incentives from the feds.

5 times I found them tracking manipulated data.

After vaccination, remember it was the unvaccinated that were still getting covid, why? If you only require testing for the unvaccinated who is going to be testing positive? You can't test positive if you don't get tested because you have proof of vaccine.

Expand full comment
Peter Zachos's avatar

That's amazing! Please post the data and the sources and verify them so we can sue the state. I would really like to see this data. You were tracking it for five times, you say. That's astounding. I applaud your persistence. Post that data here. Right now. Also please post the original data, then post the "manipulated" data, and then post your evidence that the data was manipulated, and show your evidence that proves conclusively when it was manipulated (day, month, and year) and who manipulated it.

I will wait for the data. So will the rest of the world.

Your last paragraph lacked syntax and was unclear. I'm not even sure what your claim is there.

Expand full comment
Patti's avatar

"The virus" had a 99.98% survival rate. Mostly the elderly, with comorbidities.

Expand full comment
Peter Zachos's avatar

Correct. And?

Expand full comment
Patti's avatar

The elderly made up the .02% of deaths for the most part. Average age of death in Canada for 2020 was 82 where 81.5 is life expectancy. As many analysts have confirmed there was no pandemic. See Denis Rancourt and his group, or Nick Hudson at Pandata.

Expand full comment
Christine Darges's avatar

More people recovered from getting COVID than those who got the shot and then got covid multiple times. Vaxed people can’t purge the spike protein after months and months. This is long covid from the shots.

Expand full comment
Peter Zachos's avatar

Your comment lacks clarity. Do you mean that fewer people who were vaccinated and then developed covid infections recovered from covid than those who caught covid? What do you consider "recovering" from covid? Not recovering from a virus means that it killed you. Are you claiming that more people who received the vaccine died than those who did not?

Expand full comment
Mike Jones's avatar

Peter, this was never about health, it was all about generating fear and control.

When we were told to ignore years of research, and that we should isolate ourselves in our home, forcing kids who are not impacted by the virus as much to wear a mask while playing baseball 60ft from the closest player. This was nothing more than panic porn.

https://hub.jhu.edu/2019/11/06/event-201-health-security/

You rag on conspiracy theorist, but they are up something 17-0

Every response the government made related to covid was the wrong response.

There was treatment that worked, Xlear nasal spray was shown by multiple universities to have reduced covid to undetectable limits in 25 minutes. What does the government do? they sue the company because they dared to share the results of science that may contradict the government. Search "Potent inhibitor of SARS" , the NIH published in 2005 that HCQ was a potent inhibitor of SARS Covid. But it won't work on SARS Covid 19?

It was a 100% manufactured problem that our government funded, would you like the USAID/NIH grant numbers to Eco-Health Alliance, which in 2019 presented what they were working on listing the grant numbers.

Expand full comment
David 1260's avatar

That's why I'm curious how this study ever got published. Apparently, this Journal is outside the ring of Pharma-controlled publications.

Expand full comment
Metta Zetty's avatar

Or maybe it will still be retracted . . . .

Expand full comment
Elwood R. Bernat's avatar

It already is. That includes six decades of experimental vaccines.

Expand full comment
MBP's avatar

I was specifically meaning the covid shots but yes, you're correct, the harms from all vaccines are huge contributors to our toxic exposures and overload

Expand full comment
Paving the Way's avatar

personal and governmental liability. In the US Trump holds the key, and right now he is failing humanity.

Expand full comment
Christine Darges's avatar

Proper recall procedures are required. Follow Karen Kingston for updates

Expand full comment
Marie-Louise Murville's avatar

Thank you for your great, important work!

Expand full comment
DUANE HAYES's avatar

Reminder to all, be sure to post this on every social media platform, X, Facebook, Truth Social, the more the better. The more people get this information, the closer we all are to banning the clot shots for good.

Expand full comment
David 1260's avatar

This study is not as damning as Nicolas makes it appear. Check out this conclusion: "While acknowledging potential side effects, our findings support the overall safety of the COVID-19 vaccine concerning cardiovascular complications such as myocardial infarction, stroke, and arrhythmia."

I tried writing to the corresponding author, but the medical school address in Iran was rejected, so there may be a typo in the print.

Expand full comment
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH's avatar

The abstract and conclusion don't reflect the actual data AT ALL. That's why it's important to look at the results section.

Expand full comment
HSingh's avatar

That's right. And this is what authors (except the most courageous) voluntarily do when what they are publishing goes against the big pharma interests. They appease big pharma in the abstract and conclusions sections - its like one is reading 2 different papers joined together. This self-censorship is very common.

Expand full comment
FollowsTheWay's avatar

Bingo.

Expand full comment
Rochelle's avatar

Why didn't you mention this important point in your article?

Expand full comment
anacara's avatar

Thank you, because I read the abstract and conclusion and everything was completely different from what you are saying, however, what I've seen of the data is confusing too. I will have to look properly on my computer rather than the phone, as the discrepancies are doing my head in.

Expand full comment
Metta Zetty's avatar

This is SOP. What matters is the actual data, not how the authors spin it for publication.

Expand full comment
Rick Zammuto's avatar

This is probably how they got it published, by using contradictory double speak!

Expand full comment
Laurie Winogrand's avatar

As Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, stated, the study authors will make whatever statements it takes in the ‘conclusions’ necessary to get published. To get to the true meaning of the study read the results vs conclusions. That is where the true outcomes of the study will lie. The conclusions are often loose interpretations that may lean toward fiction in order to allay the needs of sponsors, publishers, etc.

Expand full comment
David 1260's avatar

It's fascinating to see the double-meaning in your use of "lie." I believe you meant it in the sense of "be found."

Expand full comment
Marlene Vejrich's avatar

I was trying to put it on Facebook as a lot of the mass still does but I couldn't do it.

Expand full comment
DUANE HAYES's avatar

I had no problem. Click on share, then click on Facebook, then click on share again

Expand full comment
Metta Zetty's avatar

What happened? Did it get taken down immediately? Or couldn't you get it posted in the first place?

Expand full comment
Marlene Vejrich's avatar

I just couldn't share it so I screen shot the title n wrote about it on my post. All good I doubt I will have much seeing it I am a bit of a rebel so down I go! Even if 1 see it will be good!

Expand full comment
Metta Zetty's avatar

Agree 100%! Good for you!

You never know who will benefit from your perseverance in sharing. 👍

Expand full comment
KP Stoller's avatar

It is like our government is a flaming narcissist that can never admit it was wrong and doubles down instead

Expand full comment
Geoff Wexler's avatar

They doubled down on their patented inventions 7776521b1 & 7279327B2. Either @google those inventions or read #5 on

https://whotostop.org

Expand full comment
Metta Zetty's avatar

This is incredible, Geoff! Thank you so much for sharing.

I look forward to reviewing in more detail . . . .

Expand full comment
Metta Zetty's avatar

100%, KP!

Expand full comment
H8SBAD's avatar

The uncovering of blatant Evil amongst us is the silver lining for me in this Covid debacle. The concept of Evil is no longer theoretical but now much more tangible. This revelation has reinvigorated my faith in an omnipotent, omnipresent,benevolent force that I call God. The world would be too dreary without my Belief.

Expand full comment
Eric Larsen's avatar

I concur on all points!

Expand full comment
Peter Zachos's avatar

I think Satan is way more powerful. He even overcooked my eggs this morning. Bastard.

Expand full comment
Keihatsu's avatar

We can add this study to the hundreds of other studies that show mRNA products cause far more serious harm and deaths than their targeted viruses. Thanks as always for valuable information.

Expand full comment
stock's avatar

They are tired of their annoying little slaves and would rather replace us with AI and Robots

Expand full comment
Metta Zetty's avatar

100% ~ Bill Gates-of-Hell actually believes AI will eliminate most jobs except for coders, energy experts and biologists.

> https://www.amazon.com/Gates-Hell-Bill-Dangerous-World-ebook/dp/B0CKG3B1TJ/ref=sr_1_1

> https://expose-news.com/2025/03/28/bill-gates-says-ai-will-eliminate/

Elon wants his robots in every home:

> https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=elon+robot+in+every+home

And Yuval Noah Harari says us "useless eaters" will need to be pacified by drugs and computer games:

> https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=yuval+noah+harari+drugs+computer+games

Expand full comment
Aquila's avatar

Contrary to this article, the authors state in their abstract "No increased risk of heart attack, arrhythmia, or stroke was observed post-COVID-19 vaccination." Do they just have to lie to get published? What's going on here?

Expand full comment
David Schexnaydre's avatar

These percentages are staggering!! People need to see this!

Expand full comment
Eli's avatar

Aside from CAD, they say there were no detrimental side effects.

Why don't you address the disconnect between their conclusions and the tabled results?

Expand full comment
Vince Ciroli's avatar

For governments and the likes of the Gates Foundation this is actually good news as the gene therapy went much better than planned.

Expand full comment
Red-Pilled ER Nurse's avatar

That IS a surprise!

Safe

And

Effective

Expand full comment
PamelaDrew's avatar

Vaccines are toxic soup delivered via puncture wound with not a hint of biology to explain how they can create T-cell immunity that every medical text says is immune system response to respiratory RNA if we buy conventional medicine virus model.

Other than syringe delivering a payload, like a Trojan Horse beyond all the immune system barriers, the mRNA TRANSFECTIONS have no resemblance to vaccines they are tools used to make flue vaccines and biologics except skipping the e3xpensive step of purifying.

Like another political Nobel Prize of lobotomy TRANSFECTING humans was always criminal insanity. Fundamental defense for ALL of Nature's creations is to identify SELF from NON-SELF proteins and destroy foreigners.. this isn't rocket science.. tricking bodies into producing foreign proteins on top of the LNP assault on its own was 100% certain to cause massive harm and death and calling this monstrous genocide to slide by as "vaccine" in 2025 is deadly.

Fatal in its most perfect customized form.. 1999 Biotech of Jesse Gelsinger and subsequent Congressional hearings about false promises and genetic precision.. lies then bigger lies now!!

https://web.archive.org/web/20121025034826/https://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/28/magazine/the-biotech-death-of-jesse-gelsinger.html

Expand full comment
Chad Wilson's avatar

Why does the study conclude that there was no increased risk? Can someone explain?

Expand full comment
Downunderjane's avatar

That doesn’t explain the contradictions between the comment headline and the actual published journal article itself.

Expand full comment
Caring American's avatar

Still waiting for RFK Jr to push, at the very least, removing these shots from the childhood vaccination schedule, as this protects the manufacturers from any liability. The inclusion just perpetuates the false perception of "safe and effective" and continues the brain washing.

Expand full comment
Peter Zachos's avatar

More childhood deaths will result.

Expand full comment
Carsten's avatar

The study states:

"No increased risk of heart attack, arrhythmia, or stroke was observed post-COVID-19 vaccination"

and

"a protective effect on stroke (OR, 0.19; 95% CrI: 0.10–0.39) and myocardial infarction (OR, 0.003; 95% CrI: 0.001–0.006) was observed after the third dose of the vaccine"

how should these statements be evaluated?

Expand full comment
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH's avatar

They neglect 80% of their entire results section -- probably to get the study published.

Expand full comment
Bill's avatar

Don’t worry about this one, it’s a paid government shill, I have been arguing with it on Facebook. They are genuinely everywhere now on media platforms gaslighting everyone into thinking everything is fine, when in reality as you have just displayed here, nothing about this is fine. Keep spreading the positivity! And be ready because they will come for you make preparations

Expand full comment
roie's avatar
Apr 9Edited

What do you mean by that "They neglect 80% of their entire results section "?

I read the article and didn't find any evidence about the risks of Myocardial Infarction, Stroke and Arrhythmia that you mention. On the other hand, it is written that "No increased risk of heart attack, arrhythmia, or stroke was observed post-COVID-19 vaccination. As the only noteworthy point, a protective effect on stroke (OR, 0.19; 95% CrI: 0.10–0.39) and myocardial infarction (OR, 0.003; 95% CrI: 0.001–0.006) was observed after the third dose of the vaccine.

So what do I miss?

Expand full comment