Another useful tool in stopping 'mandates' is to KNOW OUR RIGHTS.
In this, the 250th year since the signing of the Declaration of Independence, let's all re-READ the Declaration, and the Constitution which is founded on the principles expressed in the Declaration.
Let's read portions aloud at family gatherings, at the dinner table (if your family does not gather for the evening meat, electronics-free, now is the time to start), and discuss it with both family and friends.
WE THE PEOPLE did "ordain and establish" the document that constitutes the government of the federation of our United States of America. It HAS NO POWERS which we did not delegate to it in that document.
U.S. Constitution - Bill of Rights, Amendment X
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are RESERVED to the States respectively, or TO THE PEOPLE."
Note:
-To 'delegate' is to temporarily authorize another to accomplish a task.
-The Constitution is ink on paper; it is We the People who delegate powers.
-Powers cannot be delegated by the People to the United State government, or to our State governments, UNLESS those powers belonged to We the actual People in the first place.
-Accordingly, powers cannot be "reserved" unless they belong to those reserving them.
The Primary Clause/1st paragraph [the word "preamble" appears nowhere in the original] of the Constitution makes clear that - as the posterity of the Founding Generation, who, through agents in each of the original States - We are heirs to the contract known as the U.S.Constitution.
The 2nd paragraph/clause of the Declaration states:
"-That in order to secure these Rights*, governments are instituted among Men**..."
*The "UNalienable Rights" to "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness..." - which includes the Right to property, to defend life, limb, family, and property...and to basically live as we wish - so long as we are not trespassing upon another citizen's Rights. The U. S. Supreme Court made this clear in paragraph 52 of Hale v. Henkel (1906).
*In the U.S., government has NO OTHER LAWFUL PURPOSE but to protect the Rights of We the actual People.*
**The words 'men' and 'man', depending in context, refer not only to adult male humans, but to all people - as was common knowledge through the 1960s or so.
'Knowledge is Power.'
Let us reclaim and continue to "...secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity..."
In these United States, GOVERNMENT H NO OTHERR LAWFUL PURPOSE. See also the
It is a well-known and easily demonstrable fact that the members of the US Congress and the State Legislatures do not read, evaluate or debate any of the particulars of the Legislation they vote on. They cannot read or debate the issues because the Bills approach 500 pages each. And there are sixty to one hundred new bills for them to vote on every day they are in session.
By necessity the duly elected representative votes the way his staff tells him to vote. This is not democracy or a democratic republic.
During the 1992 Presidential campaign, Ross Perot called attention to this insanity with a diplomatic observation that "a general lack of accountability among elected officials and those in the bureaucracy was the one specific reason that the people in America suffered".
Mr. Perot then suggested that the best and perhaps only way to make government officials accountable was to include the citizens in the decision-making process - every hour, every day.
He went on to note that this can now easily be done. The concerned and competent segment of the population, exercising their governmental responsibilities as citizens can do it with their computers and a software program he called:
THE ELECTRONIC TOWNHALL.
With this computer program every interested citizen can indicate whether or not they agree or disagree with every line item of every law, policy and program on the books or that was being advanced. It can be used at every level of government and in every jurisdiction.
To prevent chaos, the basic law, our Constitution and Bill of Rights would be exempt from review.
Mr. Perot speculated that the Founding Fathers would probably have done the same had the technology been available. He referred to it as the Fourth Branch of government; The Citizens Branch / The Electronic Townhall.
If the government is truly of the people, by the people and for the people then what better way is there to perfect every section of the various laws and policies that do effect each and every one of us every single day?
It would not be difficult to expect at least 50 thousand qualified citizens, per congressional district, to read four pages of law or proposed law and get their Ratify or Annual input every day the congress is in session. The results could be aggregated, made known and we would all be better off.
The program would even allow a citizen to go back and change their vote as they matured. And when a super majority of 75% is reached the law/proposed law is either ratified or annulled by immediate recognition of the enforcement mechanisms.
With tens of millions of laws and tens of thousands of taxes there is plenty of work to be done.
According to Mr. Perot, this, the harnessed experience and the combined intelligence of hundreds of thousands or even millions of citizens focused like a laser light on the real issues, will, as surely as night follows the day, perfect every law in our country and eventually it will right every wrong.
There are some for admission to certain programs, but once the above is put into effect, they have to changed accordingly.
We need to do more testing before vaccination.
Authorities didn't want us to test for SARS-CoV2 immunity during the Plandemic, even though such testing was available (ironically Bill Gates was co-owner of the main company).
Can test for not being infected with Hepatitis B, for example, for admissions, instead of proving full vaccination.
California has no effective vaccine exemptions (medical is impossible). Vaccines are mandated for school attendance, clinicals and work in medical settings.
they are mandates and don't have the force of law. however, if your school won't allow your child to attend based on the CDC's recommended schedule, your child is blocked from school.
i lost my job of 40 years because i wouldn't take a covid vaccine, it wasn't a law but it might as well have been
Yes- and yet this is a massive change in the continual addition of "vaccines" to the CDC' "recommended childhood vaccine schedule" - since the passing of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act in 1986, and amendments which extended the UNconstitutional deprivation of the right of all citizens to sue anyone or any entity that has caused them harm, directly or through a product the manufacture, sell, and/or administer.
The elimination of the HepB shot the day of birth - which allegedly protects against a disease transmitted by promiscuous sex or sharing dirty needles with drug addicts -
and reduction of the "childhood schedule" - along with a new emphasis on "shared decision making", the recommendation that parents consult a physician regarding the need and when vaccines should be given - is a MASSIVE move in the right direction.
The foundational S.C. U.S. case, Marbury vs. Madison (1803)
"...a law repugnant to the Constitution is VOID, and..the courts, as well as other departments are BOUND by that [legal] instrument."
This had to be achieved against the interests of Big PHarma, that enjoys an unconstitutional legal immunity for harms caused b vaccines - products which public funds pay much of the development cost, and all the 'advertising' cost, by unconstitutionally "mandating" them. The +/- $20 million/yr vaccine manufacturers spend on lobbying OUR representatives in Congress is a drop in their cost-of-doing-business budget.
Let's celebrate the win!
And continue to educate each other on the fact that vaccine companies essentially blackmailed Congress into passing the unconstitutional '1986 Act' - corporations that admitted in court that "Vaccines are unavoidably unsafe".
'An Inconvenient Study' prove that children who received no vaccines are significantly healthier than those who were vaccinated:
A small step...my issue is they are trying to normalize "some" vaccines when there should be none or at least nothing mandated. Is this the plan now that we all see what is happening to our children's health with these awful injections?
Rain Man: A demonic entity that corrupts in exchange for money.
Regarding the PREP Act, social conditioning, predictive programming, normalization:
The Film Rain Man Was Likely Forged to Pre-Program the Populace For the Upcoming Explosion in Vaccine Induced Autism.
1986: Congress Grants Immunity Shield to Vaccine Makers for Venom Injection Damage | Film Rain Man Begins Production
1988: Rain Man Released to Educate, Condition, & Normalize Autism
1986—2025: Number of vaccines administered explodes to 78 - and rising - from birth to two years of age. Autism diagnoses explode right along with them.
"I’m a retired Speech-Language Pathologist and we were at the forefront of the information spreading because of the communication issues. Classroom teachers and even administrators were just flummoxed and caught totally off guard.
None of us understood the complexity and scale of what was coming.
I remember loaning my copy of Rain Man to a Kindergarten teacher I worked with to help her understand the concept. At that time, no one in education knew what autism was. Then it flat out exploded!" —Willing Spirit
This would never have been possible without President Trump. If he didn’t win that election in November, do you really think this would be happening today?
Or perhaps Pres. Warp Speed is throwing us a bone with this one to further deflect from his inaction on that which he warp sped? Get the guy off the perceived pedestal, he's a puppet. As mentioned in another comment above, this might get reversed in 3 years and because they're all puppets.
Obviously doesn't go far enough, but a devastating symbolic blow to the vaccine cult with a big fat spotlight on the schedule's (diabolical) overzealousness.
In the HHS announcement*: Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said. “After an exhaustive review of the evidence, we are aligning the U.S. childhood vaccine schedule with international consensus while strengthening transparency and informed consent."
There is much to be done to 'strengthen' informed consent for vaccination. In practice, ‘informed consent’ for vaccination has been violated for years, as ACIP vaccine ‘recommendations’ routinely morph into vaccine mandates – for example, through school entry requirements imposed by U.S. states.
What is persistently overlooked is the personal, non-delegable obligation of the vaccinating practitioner to obtain ethically valid voluntary informed consent at the point of care. Without this, the practitioner must not proceed.
I recently wrote to HHS Secretary Robert Kennedy on this matter. From that email:
QUOTE
Vaccination is a medical intervention. A medical intervention may only be ethically performed with voluntary informed consent obtained by the practitioner at the point of care. This duty of the practitioner is personal, non-delegable, and cannot be transferred to policy, regulation, or institutional authority.
At every vaccination encounter, the practitioner must either obtain voluntary consent, or respect the individual’s decision to decline without penalty. Where refusal requires justification, approval, or exemption, the decision is no longer voluntary. The very existence of an exemptions process is itself evidence that coercion already exists. Under such conditions, the ethical pre-condition for consent does not exist – and without voluntary informed consent, the practitioner cannot ethically proceed.
END OF QUOTE
This is the central ethical principle: without voluntary informed consent, the practitioner cannot ethically proceed.
Most members of the ACIP are medical doctors and should be fully aware that the duty to obtain voluntary informed consent rests with the practitioner administering the intervention – not with policy bodies, regulators, or legislatures.
What are current ACIP members doing to address the reality that ACIP ‘recommendations’ predictably become vaccine mandates in many jurisdictions?
And why have vaccinating practitioners collaborated with those mandates for years, despite knowing that coercion destroys voluntariness and therefore invalidates consent?
My full email to Secretary Kennedy is available here:
Voluntary Informed Consent Under Vaccine Mandates – The Ethical Duty of Practitioners Not to Proceed
It’s a start but it’s still not proven that any vaccine is safe or effective. Until then, full disclosure of complete informed consent including the lack of safety profiles and all known side effects should be told to all parents prior to any vaccinations. Until then none should be mandated, ever. It needs to be a choice with full and meaningful truth revealed! Drs cannot just recommend without this info presented in its entirety! Time to end the jab madness!
Doctors will still be recommending the full schedule as it will still be available. This rollback will be temporary as the new regime in 2029 will move back to the full schedule and some of those will be mRNA platformed vaccines. I bet that is what happens. At least the HHS and CDC could have had the balls to flat out cut these poisons right off the schedule as in fully eliminating them. In my mind, nothing has changed.
I had every vaccine available from 1965-1977, yet, I still contracted the childhood diseases. My child, born in 1999 had every vaccine that her pediatrician recommended and didn't get any disease, but has some other issues. I now wonder if I failed her by trusting medical advice about all these vaccines.
My youngest had non-stop ear infections; I had no idea unvaccinated kids almost never get ear infections. My youngest also ended up with asthma (mostly grown out of it seems). They are an adult now.
Thank God. Now mandates need to go
Here you go: Photo of a STOP sign with a MANDATES sticker on it.
https://nedb.substack.com/p/stop-mandates-stop-sign
Another useful tool in stopping 'mandates' is to KNOW OUR RIGHTS.
In this, the 250th year since the signing of the Declaration of Independence, let's all re-READ the Declaration, and the Constitution which is founded on the principles expressed in the Declaration.
Let's read portions aloud at family gatherings, at the dinner table (if your family does not gather for the evening meat, electronics-free, now is the time to start), and discuss it with both family and friends.
WE THE PEOPLE did "ordain and establish" the document that constitutes the government of the federation of our United States of America. It HAS NO POWERS which we did not delegate to it in that document.
U.S. Constitution - Bill of Rights, Amendment X
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are RESERVED to the States respectively, or TO THE PEOPLE."
Note:
-To 'delegate' is to temporarily authorize another to accomplish a task.
-The Constitution is ink on paper; it is We the People who delegate powers.
-Powers cannot be delegated by the People to the United State government, or to our State governments, UNLESS those powers belonged to We the actual People in the first place.
-Accordingly, powers cannot be "reserved" unless they belong to those reserving them.
The Primary Clause/1st paragraph [the word "preamble" appears nowhere in the original] of the Constitution makes clear that - as the posterity of the Founding Generation, who, through agents in each of the original States - We are heirs to the contract known as the U.S.Constitution.
The 2nd paragraph/clause of the Declaration states:
"-That in order to secure these Rights*, governments are instituted among Men**..."
*The "UNalienable Rights" to "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness..." - which includes the Right to property, to defend life, limb, family, and property...and to basically live as we wish - so long as we are not trespassing upon another citizen's Rights. The U. S. Supreme Court made this clear in paragraph 52 of Hale v. Henkel (1906).
*In the U.S., government has NO OTHER LAWFUL PURPOSE but to protect the Rights of We the actual People.*
**The words 'men' and 'man', depending in context, refer not only to adult male humans, but to all people - as was common knowledge through the 1960s or so.
'Knowledge is Power.'
Let us reclaim and continue to "...secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity..."
In these United States, GOVERNMENT H NO OTHERR LAWFUL PURPOSE. See also the
It is a well-known and easily demonstrable fact that the members of the US Congress and the State Legislatures do not read, evaluate or debate any of the particulars of the Legislation they vote on. They cannot read or debate the issues because the Bills approach 500 pages each. And there are sixty to one hundred new bills for them to vote on every day they are in session.
By necessity the duly elected representative votes the way his staff tells him to vote. This is not democracy or a democratic republic.
During the 1992 Presidential campaign, Ross Perot called attention to this insanity with a diplomatic observation that "a general lack of accountability among elected officials and those in the bureaucracy was the one specific reason that the people in America suffered".
Mr. Perot then suggested that the best and perhaps only way to make government officials accountable was to include the citizens in the decision-making process - every hour, every day.
He went on to note that this can now easily be done. The concerned and competent segment of the population, exercising their governmental responsibilities as citizens can do it with their computers and a software program he called:
THE ELECTRONIC TOWNHALL.
With this computer program every interested citizen can indicate whether or not they agree or disagree with every line item of every law, policy and program on the books or that was being advanced. It can be used at every level of government and in every jurisdiction.
To prevent chaos, the basic law, our Constitution and Bill of Rights would be exempt from review.
Mr. Perot speculated that the Founding Fathers would probably have done the same had the technology been available. He referred to it as the Fourth Branch of government; The Citizens Branch / The Electronic Townhall.
If the government is truly of the people, by the people and for the people then what better way is there to perfect every section of the various laws and policies that do effect each and every one of us every single day?
It would not be difficult to expect at least 50 thousand qualified citizens, per congressional district, to read four pages of law or proposed law and get their Ratify or Annual input every day the congress is in session. The results could be aggregated, made known and we would all be better off.
The program would even allow a citizen to go back and change their vote as they matured. And when a super majority of 75% is reached the law/proposed law is either ratified or annulled by immediate recognition of the enforcement mechanisms.
With tens of millions of laws and tens of thousands of taxes there is plenty of work to be done.
According to Mr. Perot, this, the harnessed experience and the combined intelligence of hundreds of thousands or even millions of citizens focused like a laser light on the real issues, will, as surely as night follows the day, perfect every law in our country and eventually it will right every wrong.
What mandates are you referring to?
There are some for admission to certain programs, but once the above is put into effect, they have to changed accordingly.
We need to do more testing before vaccination.
Authorities didn't want us to test for SARS-CoV2 immunity during the Plandemic, even though such testing was available (ironically Bill Gates was co-owner of the main company).
Can test for not being infected with Hepatitis B, for example, for admissions, instead of proving full vaccination.
California has no effective vaccine exemptions (medical is impossible). Vaccines are mandated for school attendance, clinicals and work in medical settings.
THAT is the mandate.
No need to test that BS. Read some history on so-called vaccines. It will blow your mind.
I can understand getting hep B jab if entering an occupation where exposure to blood and other body fluids is a potential.
Mandates are just written recommendations. No biggie.
except that they are enforced
Then they're edicts or such; not mere "mandates".
Why can this site, as allegedly listed in email notifications about comments, not be reached?
they are mandates and don't have the force of law. however, if your school won't allow your child to attend based on the CDC's recommended schedule, your child is blocked from school.
i lost my job of 40 years because i wouldn't take a covid vaccine, it wasn't a law but it might as well have been
This site still cannot be reached. Can the admins please fix it?
The mandates applied to the authoritarians who used them as an excuse for coercion.
55 too many....
Even one is too many
Yes- and yet this is a massive change in the continual addition of "vaccines" to the CDC' "recommended childhood vaccine schedule" - since the passing of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act in 1986, and amendments which extended the UNconstitutional deprivation of the right of all citizens to sue anyone or any entity that has caused them harm, directly or through a product the manufacture, sell, and/or administer.
The elimination of the HepB shot the day of birth - which allegedly protects against a disease transmitted by promiscuous sex or sharing dirty needles with drug addicts -
and reduction of the "childhood schedule" - along with a new emphasis on "shared decision making", the recommendation that parents consult a physician regarding the need and when vaccines should be given - is a MASSIVE move in the right direction.
The foundational S.C. U.S. case, Marbury vs. Madison (1803)
"...a law repugnant to the Constitution is VOID, and..the courts, as well as other departments are BOUND by that [legal] instrument."
This had to be achieved against the interests of Big PHarma, that enjoys an unconstitutional legal immunity for harms caused b vaccines - products which public funds pay much of the development cost, and all the 'advertising' cost, by unconstitutionally "mandating" them. The +/- $20 million/yr vaccine manufacturers spend on lobbying OUR representatives in Congress is a drop in their cost-of-doing-business budget.
Let's celebrate the win!
And continue to educate each other on the fact that vaccine companies essentially blackmailed Congress into passing the unconstitutional '1986 Act' - corporations that admitted in court that "Vaccines are unavoidably unsafe".
'An Inconvenient Study' prove that children who received no vaccines are significantly healthier than those who were vaccinated:
https://rumble.com/v708dfw-an-inconvenient-study-feature-film.html?e9s=src_v1_cbl%2Csrc_v1_ucp_a
'The Real History of Polio' explodes the myths around that disease, and foreshadows the COVID-19 debacle:
https://rumble.com/v73gk40-episode-456-the-real-history-of-polio.html?e9s=src_v1_cbl%2Csrc_v1_ucp_a
we should be dancing in the streets! Bill Cassidy's hair is on fire right now
Cutting 55
Right, none should be “routine.”
A small step...my issue is they are trying to normalize "some" vaccines when there should be none or at least nothing mandated. Is this the plan now that we all see what is happening to our children's health with these awful injections?
Now work on NO MANDATES EVER!!!!
Bobby's been put in place to keep the rotting corpse of vaccinology on life support.
It's only because of commercial marketing its' theories have been promulgated.
One of the most successful marketing campaigns throughout human history.
Mandates don't matter. Authoritarians running roughshod with them are the problem. The answer is, "I do not consent!".
Outstanding because:
Rain Man: A demonic entity that corrupts in exchange for money.
Regarding the PREP Act, social conditioning, predictive programming, normalization:
The Film Rain Man Was Likely Forged to Pre-Program the Populace For the Upcoming Explosion in Vaccine Induced Autism.
1986: Congress Grants Immunity Shield to Vaccine Makers for Venom Injection Damage | Film Rain Man Begins Production
1988: Rain Man Released to Educate, Condition, & Normalize Autism
1986—2025: Number of vaccines administered explodes to 78 - and rising - from birth to two years of age. Autism diagnoses explode right along with them.
Before the film few even knew what the term meant because it was so rare it was seldom reported: https://tritorch.substack.com/p/autism-pre-conditioning-and-normalization
"I’m a retired Speech-Language Pathologist and we were at the forefront of the information spreading because of the communication issues. Classroom teachers and even administrators were just flummoxed and caught totally off guard.
None of us understood the complexity and scale of what was coming.
I remember loaning my copy of Rain Man to a Kindergarten teacher I worked with to help her understand the concept. At that time, no one in education knew what autism was. Then it flat out exploded!" —Willing Spirit
Thank you for your very insightful comment! This sort of lends a new meaning to the phrase, "a Hollywood ending," doesn't it?
Yep, that and , “all the world is a stage”.
😂😥🙏
Right in our faces. 😡😡😡
I am hopeful for more changes to come! End the PREP act, revise the VAERS data collecting, end mandates, etc.
And the parents of children who died of SIDS and then arrested for having a blanket in the crib need to be compensated big time!!!
Those Dopes in CDC left the Toxic MMR in the Schedule. Autism SideEfffects.
They're far from dopes. They're Funded by Big pHARMA.
Historic, wow. Now we watch the Bio-Pharma Complex go into hyper-disinformation panic mode.
Are vaccinated children healthier?
According to this study by ID Dr. Markos Zervos, they are not. 18,000 children were studied.
https://www.aninconvenientstudy.com
You are correct…vaccinated children end up with way more chronic conditions…it is insane!!!
Someone is making a lot of $$$ making our kids sick!
This would never have been possible without President Trump. If he didn’t win that election in November, do you really think this would be happening today?
Or perhaps Pres. Warp Speed is throwing us a bone with this one to further deflect from his inaction on that which he warp sped? Get the guy off the perceived pedestal, he's a puppet. As mentioned in another comment above, this might get reversed in 3 years and because they're all puppets.
My comment stands. This would not be happening if Trump were not the president of the United States.
Fair enough good sir...no sense in arguing over what we can both agree is a step in the right direction.
Obviously doesn't go far enough, but a devastating symbolic blow to the vaccine cult with a big fat spotlight on the schedule's (diabolical) overzealousness.
In the HHS announcement*: Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said. “After an exhaustive review of the evidence, we are aligning the U.S. childhood vaccine schedule with international consensus while strengthening transparency and informed consent."
There is much to be done to 'strengthen' informed consent for vaccination. In practice, ‘informed consent’ for vaccination has been violated for years, as ACIP vaccine ‘recommendations’ routinely morph into vaccine mandates – for example, through school entry requirements imposed by U.S. states.
What is persistently overlooked is the personal, non-delegable obligation of the vaccinating practitioner to obtain ethically valid voluntary informed consent at the point of care. Without this, the practitioner must not proceed.
I recently wrote to HHS Secretary Robert Kennedy on this matter. From that email:
QUOTE
Vaccination is a medical intervention. A medical intervention may only be ethically performed with voluntary informed consent obtained by the practitioner at the point of care. This duty of the practitioner is personal, non-delegable, and cannot be transferred to policy, regulation, or institutional authority.
At every vaccination encounter, the practitioner must either obtain voluntary consent, or respect the individual’s decision to decline without penalty. Where refusal requires justification, approval, or exemption, the decision is no longer voluntary. The very existence of an exemptions process is itself evidence that coercion already exists. Under such conditions, the ethical pre-condition for consent does not exist – and without voluntary informed consent, the practitioner cannot ethically proceed.
END OF QUOTE
This is the central ethical principle: without voluntary informed consent, the practitioner cannot ethically proceed.
Most members of the ACIP are medical doctors and should be fully aware that the duty to obtain voluntary informed consent rests with the practitioner administering the intervention – not with policy bodies, regulators, or legislatures.
What are current ACIP members doing to address the reality that ACIP ‘recommendations’ predictably become vaccine mandates in many jurisdictions?
And why have vaccinating practitioners collaborated with those mandates for years, despite knowing that coercion destroys voluntariness and therefore invalidates consent?
My full email to Secretary Kennedy is available here:
Voluntary Informed Consent Under Vaccine Mandates – The Ethical Duty of Practitioners Not to Proceed
https://vaccinationispolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/voluntary-informed-consent-under-vaccine-mandates-the-ethical-duty-of-practitioners-not-to-proceed.pdf
* HHS Announcement: https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/cdc-acts-presidential-memorandum-update-childhood-immunization-schedule.html
Great point! Also, they still have the Prep Act and the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act in place…BOTH MUST GO! And NO MANDATES EVER!!!
HOLOCAUST ONGOING…END ALL VACCINE…FULL LIABILITY…
Removal of the liability shield is the only way this catastrophe ends
REMOVAL OF ALL VACCINE…ZERO VACCINE
It’s a start but it’s still not proven that any vaccine is safe or effective. Until then, full disclosure of complete informed consent including the lack of safety profiles and all known side effects should be told to all parents prior to any vaccinations. Until then none should be mandated, ever. It needs to be a choice with full and meaningful truth revealed! Drs cannot just recommend without this info presented in its entirety! Time to end the jab madness!
Doctors will still be recommending the full schedule as it will still be available. This rollback will be temporary as the new regime in 2029 will move back to the full schedule and some of those will be mRNA platformed vaccines. I bet that is what happens. At least the HHS and CDC could have had the balls to flat out cut these poisons right off the schedule as in fully eliminating them. In my mind, nothing has changed.
Agreed. They have payouts with minimum percentages of their practice fully vaccinated required.
Evidently the pay to play is gone. At least for now…
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/doctors-will-no-longer-receive-financial-rewards-vaccinating-kids-cms/?utm_source=cc&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=defender&utm_id=20260105
I had every vaccine available from 1965-1977, yet, I still contracted the childhood diseases. My child, born in 1999 had every vaccine that her pediatrician recommended and didn't get any disease, but has some other issues. I now wonder if I failed her by trusting medical advice about all these vaccines.
Kelly - give yourself grace. You didn’t know what you didn’t know.
Share Del Bigtree’s film with others:
https://www.aninconvenientstudy.com/
My youngest had non-stop ear infections; I had no idea unvaccinated kids almost never get ear infections. My youngest also ended up with asthma (mostly grown out of it seems). They are an adult now.