Revamping prenatal care protocols is a priority. Second, mother's milk should be dominate for the new born and will not happen if Mom is deficient in vitamin D! 50 ng's or better. Third, early and frequent vaccine injections create the increased risk for autism. Eliminating toxic mercury and aluminum is essential. Get to it NIH! DO YOUR JOB! Vote out the congressman that work for the vaccine industry and not their constituents!
Dear Nicolas Hulscher, Dr. Wakefield, Dr. McCullough and John Leake,
May ALMIGHTY GOD rain His RICHEST BLESSINGS upon each of you for your COURAGEOUS, SACRIFICIAL, COMPASSIONATE and BRILLIANT efforts to REVEAL the TABOO TRUTHS regarding the links between the CDC'S Childhood Vaccine Schedule and Autism.
I witnessed our Son REGRESS into Autism at about 18 months old after he had been "progressing beautifully," per his pediatrician, to that point. (He is now a teen.)
When he started losing his words, losing eye contact, toe-walking, became hyper-sensitive to loud noises and having MAJOR meltdowns (not typical 2-year-old tantrums), I asked his pediatrician if the vaccinations could cause the changes. She assured me that was not the cause so I continued to allow the POISONS to be pumped into him for four more YEARS.
Our Son is considered "high functioning" per the psychologist's diagnosis and yet, my husband and I have and continue to witness him SUFFERING and STRUGGLING DAILY just to SURVIVE typical experiences in this world.
Today, one of my Nephews (9 years old) is enduring a two hour eval with a psychologist to determine whether he is Autistic. (Our Son is adopted so no genetic connection between them.)
I was born in the early 60's. My siblings, our friends, everyone else we knew and I had measles, mumps, chicken pox. We all recovered with no long-term side effects but instead the BLESSING of lifetime immunity. We did not know anyone with Autism symptoms through our adult years until about the past 15 years.
Your VALIANT efforts can help SIGNIFICANTLY in ENDING the DIABOLICAL crimes committed against our nation’s INNOCENT, DEFENSELESS Children.
Nice. Particularly gratifying for those who have been fighting this battle for decades. I was writing letters to the editor of area newspapers in our very rural area of the Missouri Ozarks, years before anyone but Al Gore had heard of the WWW.
While this will help a great deal, what is really needed now is a study comparing vaccinated with unvaccinated children. And while the powers that be use the excuse that it would be “unethical”, there are already groups like the Amish who could easily provide retrospective data.
In 2016, journalist Del Bigtree issued a challenge to the head of infectious disease at one of the most prestigious medical institutions in the world: conduct the most thorough vaxxed vs. unvaxxed study that has ever been done. The expert took up the challenge and ran the study to prove Del wrong. That study never saw the light of day… until now.
This is my thinking also. Particularly in relation to recent Covid jabs. Some people suffered, others did not. It is imperative to find out the difference that made the difference.
Thank you Nicholas Hulscher, MPH for your courageous standing with us who have been jeered, censored and assaulted when we proclaim what we have seen happen to our own children who have regressed into autism with the deadly trio of vaccines, acetaminophen, and exposures to lawn and agricultural toxicants especially previous formulations of Roundup that had Glyphosate. We have 3 children. The first two were vaccinated and had seizures with every dose. We were told to give Tylenol before and after each subsequent vaccination to prevent the febrile seizures. Our first child had doses on a regular schedule with fewer exposures to Tylenol. She has high functioning autism. Our second child we decided to only do one vaccine at a time and he had lots of corresponding doses of Tylenol. He regressed into autism at 27 months of age directly after a lawn chemical exposure as we were walking. He started grand Mal seizures in my arms. He was advanced in knowledge before that incident. He was reading childrens' books, sounding out words, knew his numbers, shapes, colors and alphabet. The next day after that lawn chemical exposure he started stuttering and pulling away. Within three months he had lost all receptive and expressive language.
We decided no more vaccinations for either child and when our third came. she got no vaccines. She has never had a seizure and does not have the academic struggles of her two older siblings.
Thanks to the McCullough Foundation for doing this important work. We all know it will be delegitimized and censored by government, by the medical industrial complex, and by mainstream propaganda sources (um I mean mainstream "news" sources), but in spite of that, this work of yours will find its way into the heads of at least some individuals who have remained unaware of autism etiology. Those individuals will make others aware, and so on. My sincere hope is that at some point society in general will come to understand the horror of what is being done to people with aggressive vaccination schedules that have become normalized.
Same old pile of peer-reviewed Texas weirdos and cowboys sensei making up stuff. What is the purpose of touting nonsense? Is it born out of the dark cubbies in the roller skating rinks of yore?
I responded to this before. Perhaps you didn't see it? My reading suggested as many as one in seven children are diagnosed with autism. Your 3% to 5% is barely above a margin of error. That's such a divergence I don't think we have any common ground for discussion.
Help me understand. How did the authors decide which studies counted as evidence of a ‘possible link,’ and is there a transparent, reproducible method I can look at to understand those judgments?
Revamping prenatal care protocols is a priority. Second, mother's milk should be dominate for the new born and will not happen if Mom is deficient in vitamin D! 50 ng's or better. Third, early and frequent vaccine injections create the increased risk for autism. Eliminating toxic mercury and aluminum is essential. Get to it NIH! DO YOUR JOB! Vote out the congressman that work for the vaccine industry and not their constituents!
All vaccines are toxic poisons and a major risk factor for illness and disease and even death.
May God bless and protect Nicholas, Mccullough, Wakefield, and the work of the McCullough Foundation.
AMEN!
Dear Nicolas Hulscher, Dr. Wakefield, Dr. McCullough and John Leake,
May ALMIGHTY GOD rain His RICHEST BLESSINGS upon each of you for your COURAGEOUS, SACRIFICIAL, COMPASSIONATE and BRILLIANT efforts to REVEAL the TABOO TRUTHS regarding the links between the CDC'S Childhood Vaccine Schedule and Autism.
I witnessed our Son REGRESS into Autism at about 18 months old after he had been "progressing beautifully," per his pediatrician, to that point. (He is now a teen.)
When he started losing his words, losing eye contact, toe-walking, became hyper-sensitive to loud noises and having MAJOR meltdowns (not typical 2-year-old tantrums), I asked his pediatrician if the vaccinations could cause the changes. She assured me that was not the cause so I continued to allow the POISONS to be pumped into him for four more YEARS.
Our Son is considered "high functioning" per the psychologist's diagnosis and yet, my husband and I have and continue to witness him SUFFERING and STRUGGLING DAILY just to SURVIVE typical experiences in this world.
Today, one of my Nephews (9 years old) is enduring a two hour eval with a psychologist to determine whether he is Autistic. (Our Son is adopted so no genetic connection between them.)
I was born in the early 60's. My siblings, our friends, everyone else we knew and I had measles, mumps, chicken pox. We all recovered with no long-term side effects but instead the BLESSING of lifetime immunity. We did not know anyone with Autism symptoms through our adult years until about the past 15 years.
Your VALIANT efforts can help SIGNIFICANTLY in ENDING the DIABOLICAL crimes committed against our nation’s INNOCENT, DEFENSELESS Children.
Nice. Particularly gratifying for those who have been fighting this battle for decades. I was writing letters to the editor of area newspapers in our very rural area of the Missouri Ozarks, years before anyone but Al Gore had heard of the WWW.
You are doing great work. Thanks.
While this will help a great deal, what is really needed now is a study comparing vaccinated with unvaccinated children. And while the powers that be use the excuse that it would be “unethical”, there are already groups like the Amish who could easily provide retrospective data.
I assume you have seen the movie by the Highwire: "An Inconvenient Study"
https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/an-inconvenient-study-feature-film/
In 2016, journalist Del Bigtree issued a challenge to the head of infectious disease at one of the most prestigious medical institutions in the world: conduct the most thorough vaxxed vs. unvaxxed study that has ever been done. The expert took up the challenge and ran the study to prove Del wrong. That study never saw the light of day… until now.
This is my thinking also. Particularly in relation to recent Covid jabs. Some people suffered, others did not. It is imperative to find out the difference that made the difference.
One way to destroy a society is to make its military aged people unreliable
Congratulations!! Happy to see JIM publish the study, despite the length of the paper.
Thank you Nicholas Hulscher, MPH for your courageous standing with us who have been jeered, censored and assaulted when we proclaim what we have seen happen to our own children who have regressed into autism with the deadly trio of vaccines, acetaminophen, and exposures to lawn and agricultural toxicants especially previous formulations of Roundup that had Glyphosate. We have 3 children. The first two were vaccinated and had seizures with every dose. We were told to give Tylenol before and after each subsequent vaccination to prevent the febrile seizures. Our first child had doses on a regular schedule with fewer exposures to Tylenol. She has high functioning autism. Our second child we decided to only do one vaccine at a time and he had lots of corresponding doses of Tylenol. He regressed into autism at 27 months of age directly after a lawn chemical exposure as we were walking. He started grand Mal seizures in my arms. He was advanced in knowledge before that incident. He was reading childrens' books, sounding out words, knew his numbers, shapes, colors and alphabet. The next day after that lawn chemical exposure he started stuttering and pulling away. Within three months he had lost all receptive and expressive language.
We decided no more vaccinations for either child and when our third came. she got no vaccines. She has never had a seizure and does not have the academic struggles of her two older siblings.
Aluminum adjuvants probably at root.
Thanks to the McCullough Foundation for doing this important work. We all know it will be delegitimized and censored by government, by the medical industrial complex, and by mainstream propaganda sources (um I mean mainstream "news" sources), but in spite of that, this work of yours will find its way into the heads of at least some individuals who have remained unaware of autism etiology. Those individuals will make others aware, and so on. My sincere hope is that at some point society in general will come to understand the horror of what is being done to people with aggressive vaccination schedules that have become normalized.
It is about DAMN time this was finally admitted. Those who knew ….have known for DECADES! We who knew were the ones shamed and forced to shut up!
Same old pile of peer-reviewed Texas weirdos and cowboys sensei making up stuff. What is the purpose of touting nonsense? Is it born out of the dark cubbies in the roller skating rinks of yore?
I guess the one Pfizer and Moderna paid for and lied about are the only reliable ones!
Perhaps you would care to elaborate on what part of their study is "made up" and present evidence of that?
I responded to this before. Perhaps you didn't see it? My reading suggested as many as one in seven children are diagnosed with autism. Your 3% to 5% is barely above a margin of error. That's such a divergence I don't think we have any common ground for discussion.
Help me understand. How did the authors decide which studies counted as evidence of a ‘possible link,’ and is there a transparent, reproducible method I can look at to understand those judgments?