Study of an ENTIRE Spanish region (~400,000 people) found NO reduction in flu cases or hospitalizations after mass flu shot rollout to children 6 months to 5 years old.
Thank you for this welcome confirmation of reasoned expectations.
Unfortunately, there does not appear to have been a study of how many infants and children were HARMED by those same flu vaccines.
Will the flu vaccine no longer be foisted with pressure and fear upon trusting parents as a result of the revelations of this study? (Of course not. Income for pharmaceutical companies and pediatricians is prioritized over children's health.)
Negative efficacy and significant risk for “adverse events.” Two patients developed paralytic Guillain Barre syndrome, and I disabling RA after (forced) flu shots.
Re: Cleveland Clinic’s findings on HCWs -And yet hospital systems continue to demand that HCWs take the flu shot…. I haven’t taken one for 25 years…. Have to mask from April to October…rarely get even a sniffle. 🙄
What if the blanket "safe and effective" vaccine narrative is more accurately "effectively unsafe?"
What if the flu vaccine is and has been the culprit for flu seasons since they've been put into arms? What if claims that they save lives have been lies all the same as claims the mRNA gene therapies saved lives? What if the statistics used to bolster claims of their safety and efficacy are just as false as Obama's American Recovery Act's "Jobs Saved or Created" statistics?
Because how do you prove such a claim? By what metrics is one able to measure the prevention of "Severe Outcomes or Death?" How does one prove a negative didn't happen?
If flu vaccines were effective wouldn't there be measurable population-wide reduction in severe outcomes and deaths? I've reviewed the statistics going back to before flu vaccines were widely injected. Guess what? No measurable reduction in severe outcomes and deaths. None. Nothing. Just like the study from Spain.
What if flu vaccines, pre-Covid, resulted in outbreaks of the flu just like RFK Jr's book "The Real Anthony Fauci" showed outbreaks followed mass vaccination campaigns the world over by about 2-4 weeks after mass injections? Remember those charts? Outbreaks *followed* mass vaccinations, didn't precede them. Followed them through the hemispheres, across oceans, no correlation with borders, seasons. Outbreaks that were normal in fall and winter happened in springs and summers - after mass vaccination campaigns.
Nicolas, I know and you know that it would career suicide for you or any MD to even try to investigate this hypothesis, much less speak the truth of it. Just like Del BigTree's insider who backed out on revealing the results of his study of vaccines. But your career limitations aren't mine. So here goes to your readers. Who can take up this hypothesis with the research source material I provide. And come to their own conclusions about the merit of my claims.
Which are that not only are the fraudulent injections toxic, they are the cause of severe illness and death. And my theory of the case implicates the 2019-2020 flu "vaccine" as the initial source of severe death and illness - by design - that then was spun up and sold to the public through mass/social media as a massive threat to compel the experimental uptake of the even more toxic and dangerous bioweapon that the mRNA "covid" "vaccines" were.
Since most people have only been exposed to a binary choice about convid, wet market/lab leak, the only debate that's received ears and eyeballs I have another possibility for readers to consider. I'm always leery of false binaries, generally constructed to keep curious minds from exploring outside the box. Some minds don't stay inside boxes. And apply their curiosity to other possibilities.
My next comment will contain information from pharmaceutical and health policymaker's official industry publications may point us to the possibility that the 2019-2020 flu 'vaccine' itself helped generate the perception that Covid was an exceptionally dangerous and infectious pathogen. The 2019-2020 flu jabs themselves may very well be responsible for the severe outcomes that were being experienced, either via direct injection or shedding from vaccines - that we know happens with the LAIV model that was standardized for use in the 2019-2020 version.
An investigator leaving no stone unturned isn't limited to two possibilities. A skilled investigator on a relentless search for truth, no matter where it leads, would start digging around into what was actually in those 2019 flu jabs that could have precipitated the entire pandemic. Yes, we know that 'vaccines' themselves shed. Fauci and the CDC eventually admitted that even about the mRNA COVID design. But known among virologists the live-attenuated format sheds, the design that was used in the 2019-2020 flu season concoction. So one didn't need to receive the flu shot that year to have gotten very sick from it.
And the 2019 flu jab used a known severe H3N2 variant that was hotly debated about its inclusion in the quadrivalent because it was known to be very severe. Here's some interesting information that may help connect some dots when paired with the study found in the Substack link towards the end this comment. And don't miss the November, 2019 CNN Fauci section I include that is also very, very curious to consider with 20/20 hindsight. He said they were looking for more volunteers to take the experimental mRNA 'vaccine' format that could be easily uploaded with new operating instructions every time a new 'variant' came out, just email the instructions to it. Given all that has transpired since it takes on a very predictive appearance, similar to "priming" in psychological parlance. The evidence for reader consideration:
- This publication describes a brand-new style of flu 'vaccine' that came online for the 2019-2020 flu season. Mammalian cell-based instead of egg-based. Claims that it was studied for efficacy...but no mention of safety trials:
"A new cell-based seasonal influenza vaccine has been issued marketing approval by the European Commission and will be available for the 2019/2020 flu season.
Flucelvax® Tetra (Seqirus) is the first cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIVc) to be made available in Europe and is licensed for use in individuals aged nine years and older.
To date, there have been no randomised controlled trials comparing the efficacy of QIVc and standard egg-based quadrivalent vaccines (QIVe)"
“This real-world study, along with other emerging evidence, indicates that cell-based influenza vaccines may result in better influenza-related outcomes compared to standard egg-based vaccine options in some seasons"
"In the UK, the potential advantages of QIVc, which is cultured in mammalian cells rather than eggs"
“We are pleased to be bringing Flucelvax Tetra to the UK next season and have sufficient capacity at our cell-based manufacturing facility in the US to also ensure supply in September 2019"
- This article is interesting. It says that they added live-attenuated influenza 'vaccines' to the schedule. It goes on to say that flu 'vaccines' most definitely, positively, absolutely don't cause the flu, and by that definition won't shed...even after all of the science on 'vaccines' admit that live-attenuated 'vaccines' do shed. Curious:
"The 2019–2020 influenza vaccine recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) have remained mostly the same, with the exception of adding the LAIV to the immunization schedule."
- These articles tell us about what the WHO's process is and what they decided the 2019-2020 'vaccine' recommendations would be. I'll note that the first link speaks to concerns with preparing for H3N2 from the prior year, while the second link says they ended up not developing that specific strain of 'vaccines', after all, and the third link says they went ahead and included the H3N2 variant, after all. H3N2 was a "very severe" variant:
- Now, this is an interesting story from CNN that came out in November, 2019, an important time frame in the evolution of the covid story. Note the discussion about the need to develop a new type of all-purpose 'vaccine', a desire to test it widely, one that focused on a protein they link to a particular virus...like, say, a spike protein. Fauci is frequently quoted in it:
"But a universal flu shot would theoretically cover every strain of the flu using what’s known as an ice cream cone approach."
"Last spring, doctors at the NIH started testing universal flu shots on Sonn and other study participants to see how their bodies respond.
The research got an extra push in September when President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at developing a better flu vaccine.
Fauci said it could take less time – but still many years – to develop a semi-universal flu shot, which would protect against not all flu viruses, but rather a group of flu viruses."
"The faster and more precise method is not to grow the virus at all and instead just create the virus’ protein, he said.
“We clone the gene that codes for the specific protein we want,” Fauci said. “I don’t even want to see the virus. I just need the sequence of that virus, the genetic map of that virus. And you could send that to me by email.”
That’s the technology that’s being used to create the vaccines being trialed on participants like Sonn right now.
“We feel like we’re pioneers, and our volunteers are pioneers,” Ledgerwood said."
- And there is a strong correlation between the 2019-2020 flu vaccine and COVID-19 susceptibility:
About that 2019 severe variant high-shed flu 'vaccine?' Culprit? And how does that CNN piece from November, 2019 read in hindsight now? They were clearly looking for "volunteers" for their study. Willing or unwilling? Anyone with resources to investigate and see what kind of "there" is there? Who's not afraid of losing their medical license (or worse) by investigating it?
Again, I'm always leery of binary limited possibilities. What seems obvious at first is often a misdirection leading away from the true source. And with the entire industry of flu 'vaccines' that discovery of skulduggery in would jeopardize has a whole lot of rea$on$ to not want this type of information to be revealed. It would generate a whole lot of "vaccine hesitancy," you know. And a whole lot more.
Nicolas, how difficult would it have been given the design of the 2019-2020 flu 'vaccine' to "smuggle" a more severe, more transmissible pathogen (via shedding) into that delivery method that would initiate sufficient severity and death to spur the narrative of convid-19?
The 2019-2020 flu 'vaccine' ushered in severe illness, death even before most people ever heard of mRNA. Built on decades of flu 'vaccines' that also resulted in severe illness and death. Where is the evidence they've worked? Is it the same type of evidence that Obama's "stimulus" used to show it worked?
Observational studies arent worthless - they have their place in the toolset. This video on Vinay Prasad's channel (if you have a subscription) details what observational studies are good for. https://www.sensible-med.com/p/how-not-to-get-fooled-by-the-medical-cb8 Likely there are free resources as well since it is an academic topic.
Thank you for this welcome confirmation of reasoned expectations.
Unfortunately, there does not appear to have been a study of how many infants and children were HARMED by those same flu vaccines.
Will the flu vaccine no longer be foisted with pressure and fear upon trusting parents as a result of the revelations of this study? (Of course not. Income for pharmaceutical companies and pediatricians is prioritized over children's health.)
Negative efficacy and significant risk for “adverse events.” Two patients developed paralytic Guillain Barre syndrome, and I disabling RA after (forced) flu shots.
Re: Cleveland Clinic’s findings on HCWs -And yet hospital systems continue to demand that HCWs take the flu shot…. I haven’t taken one for 25 years…. Have to mask from April to October…rarely get even a sniffle. 🙄
"The blanket “safe and effective” vaccine narrative continues to collapse."!!!
What if the blanket "safe and effective" vaccine narrative is more accurately "effectively unsafe?"
What if the flu vaccine is and has been the culprit for flu seasons since they've been put into arms? What if claims that they save lives have been lies all the same as claims the mRNA gene therapies saved lives? What if the statistics used to bolster claims of their safety and efficacy are just as false as Obama's American Recovery Act's "Jobs Saved or Created" statistics?
https://web.archive.org/web/20100712225301/http://www.businessandmedia.org:80/articles/2009/20090512100953.aspx
https://web.archive.org/web/20100221014007/http://www.heritage.org:80/research/economy/bg2305.cfm
https://web.archive.org/web/20100115104550/http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100113/ap_on_bi_ge/us_stimulus_counting_jobs
Because how do you prove such a claim? By what metrics is one able to measure the prevention of "Severe Outcomes or Death?" How does one prove a negative didn't happen?
If flu vaccines were effective wouldn't there be measurable population-wide reduction in severe outcomes and deaths? I've reviewed the statistics going back to before flu vaccines were widely injected. Guess what? No measurable reduction in severe outcomes and deaths. None. Nothing. Just like the study from Spain.
What if flu vaccines, pre-Covid, resulted in outbreaks of the flu just like RFK Jr's book "The Real Anthony Fauci" showed outbreaks followed mass vaccination campaigns the world over by about 2-4 weeks after mass injections? Remember those charts? Outbreaks *followed* mass vaccinations, didn't precede them. Followed them through the hemispheres, across oceans, no correlation with borders, seasons. Outbreaks that were normal in fall and winter happened in springs and summers - after mass vaccination campaigns.
Nicolas, I know and you know that it would career suicide for you or any MD to even try to investigate this hypothesis, much less speak the truth of it. Just like Del BigTree's insider who backed out on revealing the results of his study of vaccines. But your career limitations aren't mine. So here goes to your readers. Who can take up this hypothesis with the research source material I provide. And come to their own conclusions about the merit of my claims.
Which are that not only are the fraudulent injections toxic, they are the cause of severe illness and death. And my theory of the case implicates the 2019-2020 flu "vaccine" as the initial source of severe death and illness - by design - that then was spun up and sold to the public through mass/social media as a massive threat to compel the experimental uptake of the even more toxic and dangerous bioweapon that the mRNA "covid" "vaccines" were.
Since most people have only been exposed to a binary choice about convid, wet market/lab leak, the only debate that's received ears and eyeballs I have another possibility for readers to consider. I'm always leery of false binaries, generally constructed to keep curious minds from exploring outside the box. Some minds don't stay inside boxes. And apply their curiosity to other possibilities.
My next comment will contain information from pharmaceutical and health policymaker's official industry publications may point us to the possibility that the 2019-2020 flu 'vaccine' itself helped generate the perception that Covid was an exceptionally dangerous and infectious pathogen. The 2019-2020 flu jabs themselves may very well be responsible for the severe outcomes that were being experienced, either via direct injection or shedding from vaccines - that we know happens with the LAIV model that was standardized for use in the 2019-2020 version.
(1 of 2)
(2 of 2)
An investigator leaving no stone unturned isn't limited to two possibilities. A skilled investigator on a relentless search for truth, no matter where it leads, would start digging around into what was actually in those 2019 flu jabs that could have precipitated the entire pandemic. Yes, we know that 'vaccines' themselves shed. Fauci and the CDC eventually admitted that even about the mRNA COVID design. But known among virologists the live-attenuated format sheds, the design that was used in the 2019-2020 flu season concoction. So one didn't need to receive the flu shot that year to have gotten very sick from it.
And the 2019 flu jab used a known severe H3N2 variant that was hotly debated about its inclusion in the quadrivalent because it was known to be very severe. Here's some interesting information that may help connect some dots when paired with the study found in the Substack link towards the end this comment. And don't miss the November, 2019 CNN Fauci section I include that is also very, very curious to consider with 20/20 hindsight. He said they were looking for more volunteers to take the experimental mRNA 'vaccine' format that could be easily uploaded with new operating instructions every time a new 'variant' came out, just email the instructions to it. Given all that has transpired since it takes on a very predictive appearance, similar to "priming" in psychological parlance. The evidence for reader consideration:
- This publication describes a brand-new style of flu 'vaccine' that came online for the 2019-2020 flu season. Mammalian cell-based instead of egg-based. Claims that it was studied for efficacy...but no mention of safety trials:
https://pharmaceutical-journal.com/article/news/first-cell-based-quadrivalent-vaccine-available-for-2019-2020-flu-season
"A new cell-based seasonal influenza vaccine has been issued marketing approval by the European Commission and will be available for the 2019/2020 flu season.
Flucelvax® Tetra (Seqirus) is the first cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIVc) to be made available in Europe and is licensed for use in individuals aged nine years and older.
To date, there have been no randomised controlled trials comparing the efficacy of QIVc and standard egg-based quadrivalent vaccines (QIVe)"
“This real-world study, along with other emerging evidence, indicates that cell-based influenza vaccines may result in better influenza-related outcomes compared to standard egg-based vaccine options in some seasons"
"In the UK, the potential advantages of QIVc, which is cultured in mammalian cells rather than eggs"
“We are pleased to be bringing Flucelvax Tetra to the UK next season and have sufficient capacity at our cell-based manufacturing facility in the US to also ensure supply in September 2019"
- This article is interesting. It says that they added live-attenuated influenza 'vaccines' to the schedule. It goes on to say that flu 'vaccines' most definitely, positively, absolutely don't cause the flu, and by that definition won't shed...even after all of the science on 'vaccines' admit that live-attenuated 'vaccines' do shed. Curious:
https://www.uspharmacist.com/article/20192020-influenza-vaccine-update
"The 2019–2020 influenza vaccine recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) have remained mostly the same, with the exception of adding the LAIV to the immunization schedule."
- These articles tell us about what the WHO's process is and what they decided the 2019-2020 'vaccine' recommendations would be. I'll note that the first link speaks to concerns with preparing for H3N2 from the prior year, while the second link says they ended up not developing that specific strain of 'vaccines', after all, and the third link says they went ahead and included the H3N2 variant, after all. H3N2 was a "very severe" variant:
https://elemental.medium.com/inside-the-making-of-the-flu-vaccine-c5d6f8cd174c
https://www.precisionvaccinations.com/who-vaccine-recommendations-are-used-pharmaceutical-companies-develop-produce-and-license-influenza
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/918053
***********************************************************************************************************
- Now, this is an interesting story from CNN that came out in November, 2019, an important time frame in the evolution of the covid story. Note the discussion about the need to develop a new type of all-purpose 'vaccine', a desire to test it widely, one that focused on a protein they link to a particular virus...like, say, a spike protein. Fauci is frequently quoted in it:
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/11/29/health/universal-flu-vaccine/index.html
"But a universal flu shot would theoretically cover every strain of the flu using what’s known as an ice cream cone approach."
"Last spring, doctors at the NIH started testing universal flu shots on Sonn and other study participants to see how their bodies respond.
The research got an extra push in September when President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at developing a better flu vaccine.
Fauci said it could take less time – but still many years – to develop a semi-universal flu shot, which would protect against not all flu viruses, but rather a group of flu viruses."
"The faster and more precise method is not to grow the virus at all and instead just create the virus’ protein, he said.
“We clone the gene that codes for the specific protein we want,” Fauci said. “I don’t even want to see the virus. I just need the sequence of that virus, the genetic map of that virus. And you could send that to me by email.”
That’s the technology that’s being used to create the vaccines being trialed on participants like Sonn right now.
“We feel like we’re pioneers, and our volunteers are pioneers,” Ledgerwood said."
- And there is a strong correlation between the 2019-2020 flu vaccine and COVID-19 susceptibility:
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/how-flu-vaccines-accidentally-reveal
About that 2019 severe variant high-shed flu 'vaccine?' Culprit? And how does that CNN piece from November, 2019 read in hindsight now? They were clearly looking for "volunteers" for their study. Willing or unwilling? Anyone with resources to investigate and see what kind of "there" is there? Who's not afraid of losing their medical license (or worse) by investigating it?
Again, I'm always leery of binary limited possibilities. What seems obvious at first is often a misdirection leading away from the true source. And with the entire industry of flu 'vaccines' that discovery of skulduggery in would jeopardize has a whole lot of rea$on$ to not want this type of information to be revealed. It would generate a whole lot of "vaccine hesitancy," you know. And a whole lot more.
Nicolas, how difficult would it have been given the design of the 2019-2020 flu 'vaccine' to "smuggle" a more severe, more transmissible pathogen (via shedding) into that delivery method that would initiate sufficient severity and death to spur the narrative of convid-19?
The 2019-2020 flu 'vaccine' ushered in severe illness, death even before most people ever heard of mRNA. Built on decades of flu 'vaccines' that also resulted in severe illness and death. Where is the evidence they've worked? Is it the same type of evidence that Obama's "stimulus" used to show it worked?
New Born children have the absolutely most robust God given immune system ever. Shouldn’t the AAP tell God that He missed a thing or sixty?
What about adverse effects?
Nic, does the fact the Cleveland Clinicstudy was observational and thus the study is null and void to some extent?
Observational studies arent worthless - they have their place in the toolset. This video on Vinay Prasad's channel (if you have a subscription) details what observational studies are good for. https://www.sensible-med.com/p/how-not-to-get-fooled-by-the-medical-cb8 Likely there are free resources as well since it is an academic topic.