COVID “vaccine” spike protein and lab-made SARS-CoV-2 spike protein are prion-like drivers of proteostatic collapse, pathological cross-seeding, transcriptional instability, and tissue dysfunction.
Nic, congrats on your new paper highlighting the amyloidogenic nature of the spike protein (from both the Covid virus and the Covid mRNA vaccines). This phenomenon really is wrecking havoc with the human body, especially the vascular system of those affected.
I will be attending the "CHD in DC" conference next month in Washington D.C. to speak with Senators Ron Johnson and Rand Paul. It's time for Senator Johnson to have a hearing on the WHITE FIBROUS CLOTS and MICRO-CLOTTING that we know is affecting a large portion of the population.
I hope to see you, Dr. McCullough, and John Leake at the conference next month so that we can have a nice discussion like we did at the last CHD conference in Austin.
Absolutely, Senator Johnson needs to hold a hearing covering the white fibrous clots. Time is of the essence because those clots can be and have been removed at a cath lab or in surgery. Since people can be saved from dying from the white frbrous clots, it's imperative Johnson hold that hearing in order to help get the word out to more people. I hope lots of us Will send this article to Senator Johnson And Senator Paul and request. such a hearing be held.
Thankyou Nicolas for your research and resulting paper digging into the problems with MRNA technology. I agree with your last statement that those responsible need to be held accountable. So was this a medical research mistake or was the deep state pursuing some other agenda? Is this a case of trying to depopulate, break the population so they will accept one world government or making more business for the medical business?
about the question whether covid was an agenda it might be enlightening to listen for some four minutes of the conversation between Dr. Philip McMillain and Dr. Shankara Chetty.
THEY ARE PLAYING RUSSIAN ROULETTE WITH LIFE ITSELF and NOBODY IS SAYING STOP!
So, you create a chimeric GOF and then you try to play God and create a antidote!
The core warning came from Ralph Baric at UNC, one of the pioneers of this exact technique. In his own 2015 paper he wrote:
"The potential to prepare for and mitigate future outbreaks must be weighed against the risk of creating more dangerous pathogens... Scientific review panels may deem similar studies building chimeric viruses based on circulating strains too risky to pursue."
That's a researcher admitting — in print — that the work he was doing carried a genuine risk of creating something more dangerous than what exists in nature.
The warning has several distinct parts:
1. You're building viruses nature never made
Chimeras don't exist in the wild. They're synthetic combinations whose properties are unknowable in advance. As MIT Technology Review put it, there was "no way of knowing whether the final chimeras would be stronger or weaker."
2. The safety level was inadequate
Baric explicitly said he "would never argue that WIV1 or SHC014 should be studied at BSL-2" because they could grow in primary human cells. Yet that's exactly the containment level some of this work was conducted under.
3. The "luck runs out" problem
Baric's bluntest warning:
"If you study a hundred different bat viruses, your luck may run out."
This is the statistical reality — the more dangerous pathogens you deliberately engineer, the higher the odds one of them escapes, or one of them turns out to be pandemic-capable in a way the lab didn't predict.
4. The dual-use dilemma
The same technology that prepares us for outbreaks is the same technology that could cause one. The line between "defensive research" and "accidental bioweapon" is essentially nonexistent when the work involves making viruses more transmissible.
🏛️ What Happened to the Warning
The warning was not heeded — it was funded past.
The NIH funded chimeric coronavirus work at the Wuhan Institute of Virology despite Baric's own caution
The WIV went on to make chimeras from eight different bat coronaviruses, some replicating well in human cells
Institutions repeatedly insisted this "wasn't gain-of-function" by narrowing the definition until the work fell outside it
When concerns arose, the establishment response was to deny, redefine, and defund critics — not to pause the work
The crucial point: this wasn't a fringe warning from outsiders. It was the lead researcher in the field publicly flagging that his own technique was dangerous, and the funding apparatus ignored him and scaled it up anyway. That's the textbook pattern — the people closest to the risk sound the alarm, and the institutions with the money and prestige bury it.
The lesson isn't that virology is evil. It's that gain-of-function and chimeric-virus research concentrates catastrophic risk in a handful of labs, with oversight provided by the same institutions that benefit from the funding — which is no oversight at all.
Why do you not mention the groundbreaking work of Kevin McCairn in Japan? Not only did he perform most of the experimental work but he is successfully treating patients at the Edogawa Hospital with Dual Filtration Plasma Apheresis.
Credit where it is due please.
DFPA (Dual Filtration Plasma Apheresis / immunoadsorption hybrid) combines filtration with affinity adsorption; ligand columns such as tryptophan bind autoantibodies and immune complexes; the mechanism is chemical binding, not size exclusion; this allows more of the normal plasma proteome to be preserved;
DFPA removes what specifically binds; If the pathology is driven by functional species such as autoantibodies or amyloidogenic complexes, size alone is a blunt tool; affinity capture gives you targeted removal.
Dr. Kevin McCairn and patient Ken Evans joined me to discuss a promising intervention for severe COVID-19 vaccine injuries. Conducted from Japan, where McCairn and colleagues treat patients, the conversation highlights the debilitating effects of vaccine-induced amyloid formation and a novel therapeutic approach offering dramatic recoveries.
McCairn, who has treated approximately 25 patients, describes vaccine injuries linked to abnormal amyloid and mis-folded proteins, often triggered by spike protein. These cause widespread microclots, autoimmune responses, brain fog, extreme fatigue, heart irregularities, neuropathy, and organ damage.
The Japan protocol involves jugular-vein dual filtration apheresis using specialized canisters to remove autoantibodies, amyloids, and misfolded proteins directly from cerebral outflow, combined with stem cell growth factors (SGF) derived from dental pulp to promote regeneration and inhibit further clotting. Unlike peripheral vein methods, this targets neurovascular injury.
This study gives even more weight to Stephanie Seneff and Greg Nigh’s May 2021 paper. Appreciate very much your inclusion of countermeasures. Difficult to find protocols to help the many, many people who took the shot.
What percentage of practicing doctors (MDs, GPs) are capable of or interested in understanding the science and chemistry of these processes? I have my serious doubts that very many general practitioners, arguably the lowest category of doctor the system produces (not counting chiropractors and dentists), have the accumen or desire to engage with this sort of critical analysis even if it is Hulcher and his camp who are wrong or exaggerating. In other words I don't think they care enough to dig in for either direction. Just pump out the billables, play golf and bang this week's receptionist.
A perfect example of when profiteering is the objective, and safety restraints are self regulated. No business likes burdensome regulations. Regan era unencumbered vaccine mfg. NCVIA unleashed all this upon us.
Nic, congrats on your new paper highlighting the amyloidogenic nature of the spike protein (from both the Covid virus and the Covid mRNA vaccines). This phenomenon really is wrecking havoc with the human body, especially the vascular system of those affected.
I will be attending the "CHD in DC" conference next month in Washington D.C. to speak with Senators Ron Johnson and Rand Paul. It's time for Senator Johnson to have a hearing on the WHITE FIBROUS CLOTS and MICRO-CLOTTING that we know is affecting a large portion of the population.
I hope to see you, Dr. McCullough, and John Leake at the conference next month so that we can have a nice discussion like we did at the last CHD conference in Austin.
Absolutely, Senator Johnson needs to hold a hearing covering the white fibrous clots. Time is of the essence because those clots can be and have been removed at a cath lab or in surgery. Since people can be saved from dying from the white frbrous clots, it's imperative Johnson hold that hearing in order to help get the word out to more people. I hope lots of us Will send this article to Senator Johnson And Senator Paul and request. such a hearing be held.
I mean, god damn it! There’s nothing that can make this right.
No doubt. The more I read about it, the more pissed I get that it is still not acknowledged by too many and nothing ever gets done about it anyways.
Thank u for keeping the narrative going . The side effects are not going away and way for the next round of mRNA jabs .😡
Thankyou Nicolas for your research and resulting paper digging into the problems with MRNA technology. I agree with your last statement that those responsible need to be held accountable. So was this a medical research mistake or was the deep state pursuing some other agenda? Is this a case of trying to depopulate, break the population so they will accept one world government or making more business for the medical business?
hello Fred,
about the question whether covid was an agenda it might be enlightening to listen for some four minutes of the conversation between Dr. Philip McMillain and Dr. Shankara Chetty.
This is the link to it: https://philipmcmillan.substack.com/p/if-this-was-gain-of-function-what
The time point to start is at 26:44 minutes. The connection for unknown reasons freezes twice when McMillian puts up a central question.
I do not give it away which is the direction of Chetty's answer to this question.
To me it is a joy to listen to this man because he is so clear in mind.
Yes.
In his final paper with Perez, Montagnier tried to warn us! https://vimeo.com/user192601857/review/1021313092/2e32d43335
THEY ARE PLAYING RUSSIAN ROULETTE WITH LIFE ITSELF and NOBODY IS SAYING STOP!
So, you create a chimeric GOF and then you try to play God and create a antidote!
The core warning came from Ralph Baric at UNC, one of the pioneers of this exact technique. In his own 2015 paper he wrote:
"The potential to prepare for and mitigate future outbreaks must be weighed against the risk of creating more dangerous pathogens... Scientific review panels may deem similar studies building chimeric viruses based on circulating strains too risky to pursue."
That's a researcher admitting — in print — that the work he was doing carried a genuine risk of creating something more dangerous than what exists in nature.
The warning has several distinct parts:
1. You're building viruses nature never made
Chimeras don't exist in the wild. They're synthetic combinations whose properties are unknowable in advance. As MIT Technology Review put it, there was "no way of knowing whether the final chimeras would be stronger or weaker."
2. The safety level was inadequate
Baric explicitly said he "would never argue that WIV1 or SHC014 should be studied at BSL-2" because they could grow in primary human cells. Yet that's exactly the containment level some of this work was conducted under.
3. The "luck runs out" problem
Baric's bluntest warning:
"If you study a hundred different bat viruses, your luck may run out."
This is the statistical reality — the more dangerous pathogens you deliberately engineer, the higher the odds one of them escapes, or one of them turns out to be pandemic-capable in a way the lab didn't predict.
4. The dual-use dilemma
The same technology that prepares us for outbreaks is the same technology that could cause one. The line between "defensive research" and "accidental bioweapon" is essentially nonexistent when the work involves making viruses more transmissible.
🏛️ What Happened to the Warning
The warning was not heeded — it was funded past.
The NIH funded chimeric coronavirus work at the Wuhan Institute of Virology despite Baric's own caution
The WIV went on to make chimeras from eight different bat coronaviruses, some replicating well in human cells
Institutions repeatedly insisted this "wasn't gain-of-function" by narrowing the definition until the work fell outside it
When concerns arose, the establishment response was to deny, redefine, and defund critics — not to pause the work
The crucial point: this wasn't a fringe warning from outsiders. It was the lead researcher in the field publicly flagging that his own technique was dangerous, and the funding apparatus ignored him and scaled it up anyway. That's the textbook pattern — the people closest to the risk sound the alarm, and the institutions with the money and prestige bury it.
The lesson isn't that virology is evil. It's that gain-of-function and chimeric-virus research concentrates catastrophic risk in a handful of labs, with oversight provided by the same institutions that benefit from the funding — which is no oversight at all.
Why do you not mention the groundbreaking work of Kevin McCairn in Japan? Not only did he perform most of the experimental work but he is successfully treating patients at the Edogawa Hospital with Dual Filtration Plasma Apheresis.
Credit where it is due please.
DFPA (Dual Filtration Plasma Apheresis / immunoadsorption hybrid) combines filtration with affinity adsorption; ligand columns such as tryptophan bind autoantibodies and immune complexes; the mechanism is chemical binding, not size exclusion; this allows more of the normal plasma proteome to be preserved;
DFPA removes what specifically binds; If the pathology is driven by functional species such as autoantibodies or amyloidogenic complexes, size alone is a blunt tool; affinity capture gives you targeted removal.
https://synapteklabs.com/
McCairn says nattokinase and bromelain are ineffective at dealing with these amyloids.
His treatment works. People arrive in wheelchairs and leave walking.
In a hearing about the white fibrous clots, Senator Paul should have McCairn go over his work and success in treating the clots.
RFK jr and the president have been informed of this treatment- crickets. You are on your own in the USA.
Mary Talley Bowden is trying to bring this treatment to the US.
https://x.com/MaryBowdenMD/status/2044236425026031655
A Patient’s Redemption: Breakthrough Treatment for COVID Vaccine Injuries
https://drbowden.substack.com/p/a-patients-redemption-breakthrough
Dr. Kevin McCairn and patient Ken Evans joined me to discuss a promising intervention for severe COVID-19 vaccine injuries. Conducted from Japan, where McCairn and colleagues treat patients, the conversation highlights the debilitating effects of vaccine-induced amyloid formation and a novel therapeutic approach offering dramatic recoveries.
McCairn, who has treated approximately 25 patients, describes vaccine injuries linked to abnormal amyloid and mis-folded proteins, often triggered by spike protein. These cause widespread microclots, autoimmune responses, brain fog, extreme fatigue, heart irregularities, neuropathy, and organ damage.
The Japan protocol involves jugular-vein dual filtration apheresis using specialized canisters to remove autoantibodies, amyloids, and misfolded proteins directly from cerebral outflow, combined with stem cell growth factors (SGF) derived from dental pulp to promote regeneration and inhibit further clotting. Unlike peripheral vein methods, this targets neurovascular injury.
This study gives even more weight to Stephanie Seneff and Greg Nigh’s May 2021 paper. Appreciate very much your inclusion of countermeasures. Difficult to find protocols to help the many, many people who took the shot.
What percentage of practicing doctors (MDs, GPs) are capable of or interested in understanding the science and chemistry of these processes? I have my serious doubts that very many general practitioners, arguably the lowest category of doctor the system produces (not counting chiropractors and dentists), have the accumen or desire to engage with this sort of critical analysis even if it is Hulcher and his camp who are wrong or exaggerating. In other words I don't think they care enough to dig in for either direction. Just pump out the billables, play golf and bang this week's receptionist.
A perfect example of when profiteering is the objective, and safety restraints are self regulated. No business likes burdensome regulations. Regan era unencumbered vaccine mfg. NCVIA unleashed all this upon us.