In a risky move, USAF Brigadier General (Ret.) Blaine D. Holt takes the hazardous step of publishing his podcast about heterodox thinkers on the YouTube platform.
Can't wait to listen. This almost makes me want to seek out a heterodox club, which makes no sense because it would be antithetical to heterodoxy. That said, I'm not much of a clubber.
People should be judged by their questions, not by their interpersonal associations. On this "more-correct" way of judging other people, Blaine Holt comes out above reproach. If you have the courage to question authority, the courage to ask where the fundamental principles fit into an action plan, etc., then you are probably a "good guy."
People who bring up the fundamental principles behind the chosen action plans -- rather than the personal relationships of particular personalities -- tend to be the good guys. People who spend their time talking about the gossip of who has been talking to who, or who can be thought to be associated with who, are the ones to worry about.
Blaine asks the right questions.
When the bad guys made politics into something that is "all about Trump" -- then they successfully pulled the public's attention away from the principles and onto the personalities. Evaluation then became about who associates with who (like the gossip of a teenage schoolgirl) rather than being about what truly matters in the world.
The way Blaine puts it, there are Sovereigntists and Globalists, and the Globalists are the Bad Guys.
But CFR has a history of enthusiasm for Globalism, presenting a paradox. One wonders that, if he really did sign on, and if he really is against them now, then was there a change of heart?
Associations matter. This is no minor matter. The CFR is a very powerful group and anyone associated with it ought to be held in contempt for what it has wrought on society. Those who do bad need to be separated from those who do good. Sociopaths must not be able to walk without identity and the reason is is that they will end up being unknown and they will have us proving our identity everywhere we go, like it is today and getting worse all the time. Once you know he is a member of the CFR, that ought to concern you. He needs to explain this before I would care to hear anything he has to say. And that is the way it ought to be for most people. Because giving them a pass means we will let sociopaths rule us because that's what sociopaths do.
https://www.xeriant.com/mission
The game never ends.
Can't wait to listen. This almost makes me want to seek out a heterodox club, which makes no sense because it would be antithetical to heterodoxy. That said, I'm not much of a clubber.
Blaine Holt is a member of the CFR - Council on Foreign Relations. Are you sure he is a patriot?
J Guti,
People should be judged by their questions, not by their interpersonal associations. On this "more-correct" way of judging other people, Blaine Holt comes out above reproach. If you have the courage to question authority, the courage to ask where the fundamental principles fit into an action plan, etc., then you are probably a "good guy."
People who bring up the fundamental principles behind the chosen action plans -- rather than the personal relationships of particular personalities -- tend to be the good guys. People who spend their time talking about the gossip of who has been talking to who, or who can be thought to be associated with who, are the ones to worry about.
Blaine asks the right questions.
When the bad guys made politics into something that is "all about Trump" -- then they successfully pulled the public's attention away from the principles and onto the personalities. Evaluation then became about who associates with who (like the gossip of a teenage schoolgirl) rather than being about what truly matters in the world.
Believe what you’d like but when Blaine decided to become a member of the CFR, he stopped being an American patriot. Why did he make that decision?
Good question.
The way Blaine puts it, there are Sovereigntists and Globalists, and the Globalists are the Bad Guys.
But CFR has a history of enthusiasm for Globalism, presenting a paradox. One wonders that, if he really did sign on, and if he really is against them now, then was there a change of heart?
The CFR is the American arm/ sister organization to the RIIA/Chatham House in London. They are literally the HQ of the globalists.
Associations matter. This is no minor matter. The CFR is a very powerful group and anyone associated with it ought to be held in contempt for what it has wrought on society. Those who do bad need to be separated from those who do good. Sociopaths must not be able to walk without identity and the reason is is that they will end up being unknown and they will have us proving our identity everywhere we go, like it is today and getting worse all the time. Once you know he is a member of the CFR, that ought to concern you. He needs to explain this before I would care to hear anything he has to say. And that is the way it ought to be for most people. Because giving them a pass means we will let sociopaths rule us because that's what sociopaths do.
I listened to this yesterday via podbean and it is excellent. Thank you Mr Leake.
I am a huge fan of Blaine Holt