The AAP is relentless - sold out, blind, evil and agenda driven. And they know how to really pressure young Moms - "we only treat vaccinated children in our office" or "have you ever seen a child with whooping cough???"
I would suggest to walkaway from pediatric offices completely and if you absolutely MUST see a doctor for your child, see a functional/integrative/holistic one.
That's a niche just begging to be filled. Imagine a doctor who would treat your child without requiring toxic injections. Imagine one who encouraged you NOT to inject poisons into your child. They would have lines out the door.
What if parents replied, "no I haven't seen a child with whooping cough but have you ever seen all the devastated families whose healthy babies died of "SIDS" in the week after getting six vaccines at their well child visit?? Have you ever seen the children who became autistic after getting the MMR shot or other vaccine?"
Evil. Same organization that pushes genitally mutilating children (sterilizing) who suffer from mental illness pushes sterilizing children with "vaccines" that harm them.
AAP is staying in character for what its been since it was founded over a century ago.
A New York Times story from 1913. With many familiar names and characters from history, whose subsequent work in many fields, primarily medicine, banking, propaganda, industry, clergy, politics and academia are bound together by their underlying core belief in and support of eugenics.
First get to know Abraham Jacobi. "The Father of American Pediatrics":
Why is he an important figure to know what AAP and always has been about? Eugenics is a foundational value of pediatrics. Controlling the gene pool. Human engineering - designing which genes a population will possess, future generations, especially.
This New York Times story about eugenics from 1913 lists Abraham Jacobi as one of the VIP's who were in attendance for a play about eugenics, how to mainstream the idea.
Choosing Audience for Brieux Play
J. D. Rockefeller Suggests Those Who Have Aided White Slave Investigation
Social Workers Approve
Think the Drama will Impress the Moral of Eugenics - Proceeds for Education
It's a story about a play that develops notions of eugenics, social control by elites needing to protect their gene pools. It introduces germ theory as it was first coming into vogue.
AAP promoting genital mutilation and sterilization of children is staying true to its founding. It is a wholly evil organization, that wraps itself in the virtue of the healing. Purely evil organizations don't only do evil. They must have some works that are regarded as good to bring otherwise good people along for the ride to hell they have charted for us. And our children.
Well baby checks are mostly an appointment to poison your sweet innocent child. Newborns need to be seen to check their hearts, hips and heads for the first few months to insure no congenital problems. The poison is extra. Just say no thanks.
How many times do I have to post this link since 2015. None of you have reported on it. You can't read? April 1st 2020 was Agenda 21 to vaccinate and kill you all. It has nothing to do with solar panels or EV's, which aren't even mentioned in Agenda 21 (they didn't even exist when the document was written) Immunization Agenda 2030 is the plan. This plan includes 500 new vaccines, 150 mandatory, with no exemptions. Immunization Agenda 2030: A Global Strategy to Leave No One Behind https://www.who.int/teams/immunization-vaccines-and-biologicals/strategies/ia2030
To which she should reply "Have you ever seen a child with autism? Have you ever seen a dead child?". Doctors who say things like that, which is most of them, are evil or morons.
Absolutely agree! BUT, young Moms, especially new Moms are so vulnerable, they don't always know they can say "no". So many believe what the doctor tells them because they don't have the foresight or wisdom of years or someone speaking alternative treatment ideas into their life. Most pediatricians spark fear into Moms' hearts. I would avoid them at all costs.
Problem is that they probably did, and are brain damaged from pretty early on; their empathy centers were either chemically burned out and/or replaced by more 'greed' matter; see here:
"The interthalamic adhesion (also known as the massa intermedia, intermediate mass or middle commissure) is a flattened band of tissue that connects both parts of the thalamus at their medial surfaces. The medial surfaces form the upper part of the lateral wall to the third ventricle.
"In humans, it is only about one centimeter long – though in females, it is about 50% larger on average. Sometimes, it is in two parts –>>And 20% of the time, it is absent.<<-- In other mammals, it is larger. <<--
"In 1889, a Portuguese anatomist by the name of Macedo examined 215 brains, showing that male humans are approximately twice as likely to lack an interthalamic adhesion as are female humans. He also reported its absence, still reported today in about 20% of humans. Its absence is seen to be of no consequence.- wikipedia
More so in Men, it is completely absent:
Maybe if we start cutting open the Brains of Doctors and examining them we might find some answers.
Sounds morbid i know, but considering what they've done. We'll start with Fauci and work our way down the ladder;-)
If someone is vaccinated and vaccines work, the unvaccinated are not dangerous to them, so the entire "everyone needs to be vaccinated in order to protect the group" argument has always been illogical. Basically, if your vaccine works, why do you care whether or not I am injected.
They use the excuse that some people because of medical exemptions cant be vaccinated (but want to be) and therefore those are the people we need to protect by everyone getting vaccinated. They also use ppl who are immunocompromised who might not make strong antibodies to the vaccines they get and are there for "unprotected" as well. Thing is most of those ppl w exemptions do not want anymore vaccines because they have already been injured and now see things for what they are. I have no parents w medical exemptions who are worried about their child contracting a disease from another unvaccinated person. None. I do however have parents w kids who are immunocompromised who hate on the unvaccinated believing they are putting their child at risk because of this nonsense the AAP and others put out
My grandson has no vaccines and his parents don’t want him to get any. At 1 yr old, he is so smart, funny and such a joy in our lives. We have to fight the jab promoters!
Pursuit of elimination of vaccine exemption is a conspiratorial denial of civil/human rights. It ought to be prosecuted in the courts by DOJ as RICO. A vaccine by definition provides sterilizing immunity--immunity means your neighbor cannot impart specific illness to you.
Forcing someone to "acquire immunity" in the spirit of joining the ranks of the immune to protect the existing immune is a non-sequitor. It is ENTIRELY corporate in its objective; thus, it is a business securing/expansion at the expense of human health.
23 years ago, as a young mother of a newly dx child with PDD; I asked my pediatrician about cleaner vaccines. Her response? She handed me a laminated paper that told me about the danger of unvaccinated children and verbally said, 'if you don't agree with this, you need to leave my office' then she walked out of the room. 23 years ago! I imagine it is so much worse now.
Ask them, "how much did they pay you to cull your practice?"
When they cock their heads and say, "what?", then explain: you culled a good patient from your practice SOLELY because the family chooses to be circumspect about vaccines. The decision harms no one. Yet, you turn away paying customers. What business cheerily does that? None. Thus, for how much did they purchase your compliance to join ranks with the nation's pediatrics and ostracize vaccine skeptics wholesale?
Then tell them about RICO statutes, and ask them if their professional liability insurance covers criminal acts.
Really. Have an attorney draft a letter and send it to them after they turn you away.
Congress should codify religious exemptions. And we need to encourage Congress to end liability protection granted by 1986 Vaccine Act and the Prep Act. RFK needs to end the COVID emergency, which would end the need for the covid "countermeasures" and thus end their liability protection.
Congress should codify ALL objections to the injections. I am an atheist (but support the Judeo-Christian moral code and support Judaism and Christianity), although raised as a Catholic (which I rejected at 14), but even before I researched and determined these injections were toxic and deadly back in 2021, I refused them because they were developed using fetal tissue. I have no doubts my choice would be denied since I am technically not religious, though my objection is philosophical. That objection should be as valid as a religious objection.
Agree. Both philosophical and religious exemptions should be codified. More specifically, mandates should be banned as violations of informed consent. Also, privacy of medical records is needed, to avoid other forms of discrimination.
How can a claim for violation of informed consent by raised / successful if an insert is provided? People are informed of the fact they could die from this injection but, "it is mandated!" . . . all take it.
Hey, the law is the law!
Not being a doctor, I am likely missing something.
Because far too many people are ignorant of the facts and subject to coercion through lies, as well as threats of harm to loved ones, or through being denied visits with a loved one unless injected - even knowing the danger.
Just as working people were forced to take the Covid mRNA jab or lose their job, now Doctors are faced with a similar situation...either promote these vaccines or lose the money flowing from Big Pharma as they kill children. Many Doctors have elected to take the money and jab your child...
Any medical personnel that support forcing a person to take, or allow to be given to their child, these toxic injections should lose their license or otherwise be removed from participating in medical practice. I say that as a retired RN from the VA medical system. When I refused these injections, the LPN assigned (not his choice) to my doctor refused to take my vitals or have any other contact with me. She worshipped Fauci, who I informed her was a liar. Thankfully, she was "let go" and returned to Chicago from here in Montana.
I agree, but disagree when "my body, my choice" is used for abortion. The developing baby has a unique DNA - different from that of either parent - and so the baby is NOT part of a woman's body. He or she is a guest, dependent upon the mother, but NOT a piece that can be discarded, killed at will.
I completely agree with you. I was using it as a sarcastic reference to their constant refrain. I’m so thoroughly sick of these creatures. Totally agree with you.
Right and at this point in the echo chambers, we all know the corruption, the lies, the games even though the general public does not. So, we have to move forward. I keep repeating myself, on the point that the public needs to be spoon fed the facts, via the media. There are billboards warning against smoking, we need HHS to pay for ads on the radio and TV stating the risks We need to reach a critical mass in understanding, and we are far from that. Once that is reached, the laws must change to prohibit medical recommendations from being disseminated by those with conflicts of interest. A lot of attorneys cannot advertise their services due to conflicts of interest. Most countries do not allow the advertising of pharmaceuticals on their media.
According to Dr. Paul Thomas many Pediatricians could not sustain running their practices without the lucrative revenue from 'shooting up' kids. So, OF COURSE they are going to plug the leakage from religious exemptions, they affect their bottom line.
The world is ruled by vanity and greed. Human nature has a very dark aspect. We all do, and without effort it will dominate. So, no surprise with these docs. We cannot boycott them completely because there is some value in what they provide. A kid may need surgery or have a severe infection that does need to be assessed. We don't need to do those stupid wellness visits which are really a way to coerce vaccinations. Does a doctor own the right to know if your child has been vaccinated or not? Parents have the right to keep the topic off the table, maybe ask permission to use the other parent to be used as a buffer and then use them as a buffer and tell the doc 'Oh, my partner does not want me to discuss the vaccine topic, I must honour the request' end of story. Another strategy is to try to find one of the rare holistic pediatricians that do not push the shots. That is what I have done, the doc takes insurance, but does require an extra yearly fee of $600, worth every penny to not be subjected to mind control.
The pediatricians will loose. Parents don’t take kindly to ultimatums. There are other doctors who prefer healing over Pharma slavery, and those practitioners are already being flooded with patients.
Unfortunately, though over 90% of kids in California have taken the shots, and if they don't, they cannot participate in the schools that are paid for by their parents' taxes.
How do those awful lawmakers keep getting elected? It’s a horrible thing to live under that kind of control. Can’t someone sue the state for lack of informed consent or for coercion??
Sen. Pan pushed for the bill to waive religious exemptions to attend school in California. Many parents fought the good fight, went to Sacramento, but the bill passed regardless. The parameters to receive medical exemptions were narrowed, so it is very rare that a child can get a medical exemption. The world does not work according to what is fair and ethical. We live in a predatory society. Those with the money to pay for propaganda, bribe regulators hold all the cards. Homeschooling is not an option for many in a society where two pay checks are needed to squeak by. The public needs to become more aware so they can make informed decisions on who they vote for, those willing to fight on the vaccine issue. RFK Jr. is fighting, but he is facing down great obstacles in the government. He can recommend, but he can't change laws.
Every person has the right to refuse medical intervention, but the AAP argues that states have a duty to protect the broader population. The AAP thinks that non-medical exemptions erode school safety and undermine herd immunity. Herd immunity can only be reached when a certain number of the population gains the ability to not become infected. This can only be achieved by natural exposures that build cellular immunity on epithelial barriers, preventing infections, and driving herd immunity. Ironically, vaccines undermine herd immunity as they bypass epithelial barriers, creating serum antibodies that can only react to infections, never prevent them, and destroy epithelial protection in the process. Vaccines erode safety by putting healthy kids at risk. The AAP says it is in favor of medical exemptions. Ok, here’s a medical exemption: Measure mucosal and t-cell immunity, and medically exempt all who have it.
They have rules and have to review your posts before allowing the comment to proceed. No dissenters will be allowed. So many of these organizations stop your comments because of their "community guidelines. " I've tried and my comments are never published.
Doesn't hurt to at least "send" a comment. The editors who review them at least will get the message and be forced to realize that not everyone agrees with their views.
Obviously don't call them fascists or such. But perhaps some carefully phrased comments might be allowed through. 🤷🏼♀️
The AAP is relentless - sold out, blind, evil and agenda driven. And they know how to really pressure young Moms - "we only treat vaccinated children in our office" or "have you ever seen a child with whooping cough???"
I would suggest to walkaway from pediatric offices completely and if you absolutely MUST see a doctor for your child, see a functional/integrative/holistic one.
That's a niche just begging to be filled. Imagine a doctor who would treat your child without requiring toxic injections. Imagine one who encouraged you NOT to inject poisons into your child. They would have lines out the door.
They do… they charge huge retainers… and the wealthiest parents all pay it…
What if parents replied, "no I haven't seen a child with whooping cough but have you ever seen all the devastated families whose healthy babies died of "SIDS" in the week after getting six vaccines at their well child visit?? Have you ever seen the children who became autistic after getting the MMR shot or other vaccine?"
Exactly. I made a similar reply before seeing your excellent post. Comes IMMEDIATELY to mind, doesn't it?
Criminals.
Two thumbs up !!;-)
Evil. Same organization that pushes genitally mutilating children (sterilizing) who suffer from mental illness pushes sterilizing children with "vaccines" that harm them.
AAP is staying in character for what its been since it was founded over a century ago.
A New York Times story from 1913. With many familiar names and characters from history, whose subsequent work in many fields, primarily medicine, banking, propaganda, industry, clergy, politics and academia are bound together by their underlying core belief in and support of eugenics.
First get to know Abraham Jacobi. "The Father of American Pediatrics":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Jacobi
https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article-abstract/24/2/282/40515/ABRAHAM-JACOBI-PEDIATRIC-PIONEER
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12913838/
Why is he an important figure to know what AAP and always has been about? Eugenics is a foundational value of pediatrics. Controlling the gene pool. Human engineering - designing which genes a population will possess, future generations, especially.
This New York Times story about eugenics from 1913 lists Abraham Jacobi as one of the VIP's who were in attendance for a play about eugenics, how to mainstream the idea.
Choosing Audience for Brieux Play
J. D. Rockefeller Suggests Those Who Have Aided White Slave Investigation
Social Workers Approve
Think the Drama will Impress the Moral of Eugenics - Proceeds for Education
The New York Times, page 13, February 23, 1913
https://www.newspapers.com/article/31090629/edward_l_bernays_medical_review_of/
It's a story about a play that develops notions of eugenics, social control by elites needing to protect their gene pools. It introduces germ theory as it was first coming into vogue.
AAP promoting genital mutilation and sterilization of children is staying true to its founding. It is a wholly evil organization, that wraps itself in the virtue of the healing. Purely evil organizations don't only do evil. They must have some works that are regarded as good to bring otherwise good people along for the ride to hell they have charted for us. And our children.
Crazy!
Well baby checks are mostly an appointment to poison your sweet innocent child. Newborns need to be seen to check their hearts, hips and heads for the first few months to insure no congenital problems. The poison is extra. Just say no thanks.
How many times do I have to post this link since 2015. None of you have reported on it. You can't read? April 1st 2020 was Agenda 21 to vaccinate and kill you all. It has nothing to do with solar panels or EV's, which aren't even mentioned in Agenda 21 (they didn't even exist when the document was written) Immunization Agenda 2030 is the plan. This plan includes 500 new vaccines, 150 mandatory, with no exemptions. Immunization Agenda 2030: A Global Strategy to Leave No One Behind https://www.who.int/teams/immunization-vaccines-and-biologicals/strategies/ia2030
To which she should reply "Have you ever seen a child with autism? Have you ever seen a dead child?". Doctors who say things like that, which is most of them, are evil or morons.
Absolutely agree! BUT, young Moms, especially new Moms are so vulnerable, they don't always know they can say "no". So many believe what the doctor tells them because they don't have the foresight or wisdom of years or someone speaking alternative treatment ideas into their life. Most pediatricians spark fear into Moms' hearts. I would avoid them at all costs.
Wise words, true every one.
The Butchers of medicine still want the blood of your children.
Headline: Homeschooling explosion follows AAP vaccination stance
They will be coming for the homeschoolers next.
The AAP is anti-children and anti-parent.
These pediatric frauds should be forced to take the poisons they peddle to parents.
Problem is that they probably did, and are brain damaged from pretty early on; their empathy centers were either chemically burned out and/or replaced by more 'greed' matter; see here:
"The interthalamic adhesion (also known as the massa intermedia, intermediate mass or middle commissure) is a flattened band of tissue that connects both parts of the thalamus at their medial surfaces. The medial surfaces form the upper part of the lateral wall to the third ventricle.
"In humans, it is only about one centimeter long – though in females, it is about 50% larger on average. Sometimes, it is in two parts –>>And 20% of the time, it is absent.<<-- In other mammals, it is larger. <<--
"In 1889, a Portuguese anatomist by the name of Macedo examined 215 brains, showing that male humans are approximately twice as likely to lack an interthalamic adhesion as are female humans. He also reported its absence, still reported today in about 20% of humans. Its absence is seen to be of no consequence.- wikipedia
More so in Men, it is completely absent:
Maybe if we start cutting open the Brains of Doctors and examining them we might find some answers.
Sounds morbid i know, but considering what they've done. We'll start with Fauci and work our way down the ladder;-)
💯👍
part of the below comes from Rappoports ideas:
ped(o)-I-at-rics...
In at least triplicate, body weight adjusted.
If someone is vaccinated and vaccines work, the unvaccinated are not dangerous to them, so the entire "everyone needs to be vaccinated in order to protect the group" argument has always been illogical. Basically, if your vaccine works, why do you care whether or not I am injected.
They use the excuse that some people because of medical exemptions cant be vaccinated (but want to be) and therefore those are the people we need to protect by everyone getting vaccinated. They also use ppl who are immunocompromised who might not make strong antibodies to the vaccines they get and are there for "unprotected" as well. Thing is most of those ppl w exemptions do not want anymore vaccines because they have already been injured and now see things for what they are. I have no parents w medical exemptions who are worried about their child contracting a disease from another unvaccinated person. None. I do however have parents w kids who are immunocompromised who hate on the unvaccinated believing they are putting their child at risk because of this nonsense the AAP and others put out
My grandson has no vaccines and his parents don’t want him to get any. At 1 yr old, he is so smart, funny and such a joy in our lives. We have to fight the jab promoters!
The child is blessed. Keep fighting. When everyone says no the evil will flee.
Pursuit of elimination of vaccine exemption is a conspiratorial denial of civil/human rights. It ought to be prosecuted in the courts by DOJ as RICO. A vaccine by definition provides sterilizing immunity--immunity means your neighbor cannot impart specific illness to you.
Forcing someone to "acquire immunity" in the spirit of joining the ranks of the immune to protect the existing immune is a non-sequitor. It is ENTIRELY corporate in its objective; thus, it is a business securing/expansion at the expense of human health.
DOJ should be ALL over this.
Ahhh, but you are still free to homeschool, they say. That is the price of your freedom to not inject your child.
Eh, where's the propery tax refund for school support payments?
They claim impaired immunity, such as my niece who got that from myriad spinal bifida operations.
23 years ago, as a young mother of a newly dx child with PDD; I asked my pediatrician about cleaner vaccines. Her response? She handed me a laminated paper that told me about the danger of unvaccinated children and verbally said, 'if you don't agree with this, you need to leave my office' then she walked out of the room. 23 years ago! I imagine it is so much worse now.
That happened recently to my daughter...she asked what was in vaccine and was asked to leave the practice "We aren't the right office for you" 🤣
Ask them, "how much did they pay you to cull your practice?"
When they cock their heads and say, "what?", then explain: you culled a good patient from your practice SOLELY because the family chooses to be circumspect about vaccines. The decision harms no one. Yet, you turn away paying customers. What business cheerily does that? None. Thus, for how much did they purchase your compliance to join ranks with the nation's pediatrics and ostracize vaccine skeptics wholesale?
Then tell them about RICO statutes, and ask them if their professional liability insurance covers criminal acts.
Really. Have an attorney draft a letter and send it to them after they turn you away.
I assume, whether you agreed or not, you walked away permanently from her practice?!
I hope you left a Molotov cocktail behind as a thank you gift.
Congress should codify religious exemptions. And we need to encourage Congress to end liability protection granted by 1986 Vaccine Act and the Prep Act. RFK needs to end the COVID emergency, which would end the need for the covid "countermeasures" and thus end their liability protection.
Congress should codify ALL objections to the injections. I am an atheist (but support the Judeo-Christian moral code and support Judaism and Christianity), although raised as a Catholic (which I rejected at 14), but even before I researched and determined these injections were toxic and deadly back in 2021, I refused them because they were developed using fetal tissue. I have no doubts my choice would be denied since I am technically not religious, though my objection is philosophical. That objection should be as valid as a religious objection.
Agree. Both philosophical and religious exemptions should be codified. More specifically, mandates should be banned as violations of informed consent. Also, privacy of medical records is needed, to avoid other forms of discrimination.
How can a claim for violation of informed consent by raised / successful if an insert is provided? People are informed of the fact they could die from this injection but, "it is mandated!" . . . all take it.
Hey, the law is the law!
Not being a doctor, I am likely missing something.
Coercion (aka mandates) violates the "consent" in "informed consent".
That too.
The mRNA injections come with a BLANK insert, not the usual insert that accompanies drugs/medications.
Why ban voluntary recommendations?
https://americasbestpics.com/picture/mandate-legal-definition-blacks-law-dictionary-11th-ed-mandate-4-vOWnF1KB9
From a retired professor at the University of Michigan 2023/8/24 Duration: 1:57
https://rumble.com/v3b5ib2-mandates-are-not-law-we-do-not-comply.html
Because far too many people are ignorant of the facts and subject to coercion through lies, as well as threats of harm to loved ones, or through being denied visits with a loved one unless injected - even knowing the danger.
Actually, I wasn't clear - my objection is MORAL, although it falls within the philosophical realm, I suppose.
Just as working people were forced to take the Covid mRNA jab or lose their job, now Doctors are faced with a similar situation...either promote these vaccines or lose the money flowing from Big Pharma as they kill children. Many Doctors have elected to take the money and jab your child...
Any medical personnel that support forcing a person to take, or allow to be given to their child, these toxic injections should lose their license or otherwise be removed from participating in medical practice. I say that as a retired RN from the VA medical system. When I refused these injections, the LPN assigned (not his choice) to my doctor refused to take my vitals or have any other contact with me. She worshipped Fauci, who I informed her was a liar. Thankfully, she was "let go" and returned to Chicago from here in Montana.
Whatever happened to my body my choice? The most intimate part of me, the govt does not get a pass to push poison into my veins. Where are we living?
I agree, but disagree when "my body, my choice" is used for abortion. The developing baby has a unique DNA - different from that of either parent - and so the baby is NOT part of a woman's body. He or she is a guest, dependent upon the mother, but NOT a piece that can be discarded, killed at will.
I completely agree with you. I was using it as a sarcastic reference to their constant refrain. I’m so thoroughly sick of these creatures. Totally agree with you.
I presumed that was the case, but I wanted others reading this to know where I stand on that ridiculous excuse that is so often used.
NO NO NO NOT NOPE
WERE NOT GOING TO TAKE IT
How do we stop them?
Great question since they have the means to purchase power/government....
Right and at this point in the echo chambers, we all know the corruption, the lies, the games even though the general public does not. So, we have to move forward. I keep repeating myself, on the point that the public needs to be spoon fed the facts, via the media. There are billboards warning against smoking, we need HHS to pay for ads on the radio and TV stating the risks We need to reach a critical mass in understanding, and we are far from that. Once that is reached, the laws must change to prohibit medical recommendations from being disseminated by those with conflicts of interest. A lot of attorneys cannot advertise their services due to conflicts of interest. Most countries do not allow the advertising of pharmaceuticals on their media.
According to Dr. Paul Thomas many Pediatricians could not sustain running their practices without the lucrative revenue from 'shooting up' kids. So, OF COURSE they are going to plug the leakage from religious exemptions, they affect their bottom line.
Then they are scum that place money over the lives of the children they treat and should be boycotted or otherwise driven out of business.
The world is ruled by vanity and greed. Human nature has a very dark aspect. We all do, and without effort it will dominate. So, no surprise with these docs. We cannot boycott them completely because there is some value in what they provide. A kid may need surgery or have a severe infection that does need to be assessed. We don't need to do those stupid wellness visits which are really a way to coerce vaccinations. Does a doctor own the right to know if your child has been vaccinated or not? Parents have the right to keep the topic off the table, maybe ask permission to use the other parent to be used as a buffer and then use them as a buffer and tell the doc 'Oh, my partner does not want me to discuss the vaccine topic, I must honour the request' end of story. Another strategy is to try to find one of the rare holistic pediatricians that do not push the shots. That is what I have done, the doc takes insurance, but does require an extra yearly fee of $600, worth every penny to not be subjected to mind control.
The pediatricians will loose. Parents don’t take kindly to ultimatums. There are other doctors who prefer healing over Pharma slavery, and those practitioners are already being flooded with patients.
Unfortunately, though over 90% of kids in California have taken the shots, and if they don't, they cannot participate in the schools that are paid for by their parents' taxes.
How do those awful lawmakers keep getting elected? It’s a horrible thing to live under that kind of control. Can’t someone sue the state for lack of informed consent or for coercion??
Sen. Pan pushed for the bill to waive religious exemptions to attend school in California. Many parents fought the good fight, went to Sacramento, but the bill passed regardless. The parameters to receive medical exemptions were narrowed, so it is very rare that a child can get a medical exemption. The world does not work according to what is fair and ethical. We live in a predatory society. Those with the money to pay for propaganda, bribe regulators hold all the cards. Homeschooling is not an option for many in a society where two pay checks are needed to squeak by. The public needs to become more aware so they can make informed decisions on who they vote for, those willing to fight on the vaccine issue. RFK Jr. is fighting, but he is facing down great obstacles in the government. He can recommend, but he can't change laws.
Pull your children out of Public school and watch how fast vaccines become optional!
Every person has the right to refuse medical intervention, but the AAP argues that states have a duty to protect the broader population. The AAP thinks that non-medical exemptions erode school safety and undermine herd immunity. Herd immunity can only be reached when a certain number of the population gains the ability to not become infected. This can only be achieved by natural exposures that build cellular immunity on epithelial barriers, preventing infections, and driving herd immunity. Ironically, vaccines undermine herd immunity as they bypass epithelial barriers, creating serum antibodies that can only react to infections, never prevent them, and destroy epithelial protection in the process. Vaccines erode safety by putting healthy kids at risk. The AAP says it is in favor of medical exemptions. Ok, here’s a medical exemption: Measure mucosal and t-cell immunity, and medically exempt all who have it.
🎯❤️🎯
Would you consider leaving a comment under the AAP article? It's free to access and anyone can comment.
They have rules and have to review your posts before allowing the comment to proceed. No dissenters will be allowed. So many of these organizations stop your comments because of their "community guidelines. " I've tried and my comments are never published.
Doesn't hurt to at least "send" a comment. The editors who review them at least will get the message and be forced to realize that not everyone agrees with their views.
Obviously don't call them fascists or such. But perhaps some carefully phrased comments might be allowed through. 🤷🏼♀️