When the very first video came out it looked like maybe it was a bad shoot & I told myself to wait for the body cam. I needed to see what he was seeing at the time. Before it was released I saw a podcaster break down the first video pausing at different increments. That is when I saw 2 facts I found important. The first being that it was easy to confuse the agent shooting with the other agent to his right & it was clearer how the shooting agent was moving. The 2nd was Goode’s left front tire. After she put her SUV in reverse & cocked her wheels, her tire lost traction, spun out when she punched it. That slowed down her initial exceleration when she punched the gas going forward. Her tire would not have lost traction if she was trying to leave at a safe speed. A day later the agent’s cell phone video was released. *NOTE: the agents do not have body cams because the previous administration severely cut I.C.E.’s budget right at the start of the Biden’s term & I believe at least 1 or 2 more times after that. The only agents who have body cams are the Quick Response Teams.* Carl Higbie on NewsMax, a former SEAL & very familiar with the training for approaching a vehicle & positioning the agents were using, ran through the video & froze it right before Goode punched the gas. She was looking dead straight at the agent, eye contact with a smirk when the agent again ordered her to stop & get out. then punches it. Her front tire loosing traction slowed down the force of which the SUV hit the agent. If not for that the agent would have been struck with even more force than he was. Instead of just injuries causing internal bleeding, he would have been far worse shape or dead. Of course I am not a forensics expert & I don’t claim to be. But when you look at all angles of the incident from above ground it would appear that agent was damn lucky & Goode was just plain foolish.
One more point that really pisses me off about Goode & her partner. Their dog was in the back seat. You’ll see that in the agent’s video. To bring loved ones that are precious, innocent & defenseless to situations with a high propensity for something bad to happen tells me both of them were pretty damn stupid. I hope that poor dog did not get hurt when she crashed or that it caught a bullet. I have seen it at so many “friendly protests” that are really just agitator rallies, babies in strollers, little kids that are only holding up signs mommy told them to hold up, dogs that could get hurt or even bite someone it perceives as dangerous. Leave the kids & pets at home!
Personally, I've had my fill of hysterical people causing endangerment to law enforcement with impunity. Witnessing the antics of "tolerated violence" by the likes of Antifa, Black Lives Matter, and their evil predecessors, Weather Underground, I have concluded that they represent an unreasonable, clear and present danger to civil society. I have personally sustained injuries, many times, because of people who did things which were illegal, malicious and I had to deal with the consequences OF THEIR ACTIONS. Notably, a disgruntled arsonist who set fire to a bakery, where I was injured fighting the fire, was able to act upon their flawed perceptions. This person was allowed to be free, receive public funds, paid expenses for counselling, free room and board, and to light fires. The woman who assaulted the officer with her vehicle has been held responsible for her actions, and will never harm another law enforcement officer.
This kind of behavior has been going on a long time...Remember when Patty Hearst was abducted by "radicals" and even was involved in a bank robbery? ...probably you don't as it was so long ago... few are still alive from that era... I think it was a group who called themselves THE WEATHERMEN...My memory is there was shooting involved in that also. I don't think that group got much punishment...
I respect your desire to try and reach an objective viewpoint, without placing politics above empiricism, but one of the problems with the public trying to second guess officers actions is that in most cases they have absolutely no experiential basis for making judgements.
Here is one of the common misconceptions. Once the decision to shoot has been reached, it can only very rarely be avoided. It's why courts and disciplinary proceedings only judge the events up to and including the 'moment of threat'. In many states, the law states that courts are only allowed to evaluate the 'moment of threat', although a very, very recent 9-0 Supreme Court decision changes this- the events which lead up to the 'moment of threat' are now to be considered by courts in all states, not just some. I will link an article at the bottom.
Here's another problem. The fact that Renee Good didn't appear threatening actually makes the case better for the officer. This may seem absurd at face value, but in a legal sense it's entirely true. Although some may not like the laws governing ICE what is true is that ICE officers are allowed to arrest and detain citizens if citizens attempt to interfere or obstruct them in the pursuit of their lawful duties. It's clear that Renee Good did this. The officers were allowed to arrest and detain her, and once one understand this, one can also understand that it's not all unusual for any type of law enforcement officer to step in front of vehicle in order to prevent a somewhat compliant but reluctant citizen from fleeing the scene at speed in a vehicle once they realise that they've crossed a line and are about to be arrested.
The final problem is hindsight bias. We know what happened. We've seen the video. But neither Good nor the ICE officer had the benefit of hindsight. It obvious in this tragic incident that either of them anticipated what unfurled. If Renee Good had been aggressive and threatening, it was clear that she was going to attempt to flee a lawful arrest, and the officer then decided to step in front of the vehicle, with the natural result that this might cause him to shoot if she attempted to ram him, then this could have weighed against the ICE officer in subsequent court or disciplinary proceedings, because in some circumstances this could be construed as 'officer induced jeopardy'. But because Renee Good didn't give any obvious signals that she was going to try to leave the scene, stepping in front of the car so that an arrest could be made was an entirely reasonable thing to do.
Reports on X are now suggesting that the ICE officer suffered internal bleeding from the bump. If this is verified as true it makes it even more likely he won't suffer disciplinary sanctions or legal repercussion. It should also be noted that past empirical observations of use-of-force incidents show for an officer with a firearm holstered it takes between 1.8 and 2.5 for a well-trained officer to perform the physical actions which result from the 'moment of threat' and the decision to shoot. When the experts and/or courts come to judge the ICE officers actions they will be legally bound to only consider what happened roughly two seconds before the shooting took place, as well as the events which immediately preceded it.
Good essay. For a non-expert it was a solid attempt at objectivity.
Regarding training there are 2 things: one these people are not trained worth a d..n. These are people being given about $50,000.00 to sign on. Further, these are people who have their own prejudices and hatred. They operate with the expectation of immunity for whatever they do. They do not believe in law and operate as Trump, no morality, no laws, only their own non-thinking bigotry. Wearing masks gives them a something to hide behind which further empowers them.
While I appreciate this writer's efforts to acknowledge his own biases/prejudices and try to observe independent of them (definitely a serious challenge for all of us), they still seep into his analysis of the situation. Audio of the woman and her wife clearly show they were not in any anger or hateful state. As many on the left, they strive to deal with spiritual kindness even when confronting hate. And it is a spiritual position. I wish those on the right would do the same. It would make mutual communication a much greater possibility that could help create a real popular front against the oligarchs that control both Parties and support the same imperialist goals. Tucker Carlson, with whom I have big disagreements. very correctly noted the rape of this country by these super wealthy moghuls with their goals of extraction of all resources of any country, especially our own. The industrial wastelands are a clear demonstration of this. This is Disaster Capitalism that Naomi Klein wrote about.
Thanks for your cogent observations. I have a question for you:
Is there any difference between "Disaster Capitalism" and "Venture Capitalism"?
Recently I have heard both these phrases used having never seen them before...of course the English language is a vast hodge podge of different times and places so no one person has "seen it all" ...but anyway--I am interested if you or anyone reading this has some comment about those two designations.
Kathleen, a decent definition of Disaster Capitalism comes from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace:
----------------------------------------
"The concept of “disaster capitalism,” coined by Naomi Klein in her book The Shock Doctrine in 2007, holds that conflicts, natural disasters, and other forms of crises create a propitious environment for political and economic elites to disempower and dispossess communities."
----------------------------------------
The key point is that it is utilized by politically-connected elites for the purpose of dispossession (i.e., confiscation/plundering of the private property of others). Like the term "crony capitalism" it is a contradiction-in-terms, because capitalism is a unique social system defined by Merriam-Webster as:
----------------------------------------
"an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market"
----------------------------------------
The point of disaster capitalism is that decision-making is centralized, like when the government used taxpayer dollars to bail out the big banks in the housing crisis of 2007-2009, letting regular people suffer in the process. Under actual capitalism, public officials never get to choose to pick winners and losers like that.
Venture capitalism is merely that part of capitalism involving being an early adopter in promising prospects, such as when the Wright brothers created flying machines ("airplanes"), even though people thought it impossible. Funding such entrepreneurial behavior before others have caught on to the inherent value is venture capitalism.
I think we have to wait for accident reconstruction experts and forensic pathologists to determine cause and manner of death. Of course, until that time, everyone is an expert. Even liberal arts majors who would not be allowed to apply to Medical School. W. Manion, MDPhDJDMBA Medical Examiner Forensic Pathologist, retired.
ICE is acting like an invading and occupying military force, masked and armed, loosed upon a hostile population. Very much like the way the US military acted after the invasion and destruction of Iraq. How many times did US soldiers shoot and kill families in cars at roadblocks, after shouting instructions the driver couldn't understand? Always "perceiving" they were in danger? It's not surprising to learn that the ICE agent who shot Renee Good served in Iraq, part of that criminal invasion. This is imperialist thuggery, come home to roost. However mistaken she may have been in her reaction, shooting her in the head was beyond absurd. The agent could have jumped out of the way. John is right: if ICE wanted to arrest her, that could have easily been done later. Renee Good no more deserved to die than did Ashley Babbitt.
You are either intentionally deceiving or criminally insane.. Babbitt was not threatening the killer with a 4000lb weapon, nor any other... Nor did the killer make any attempt to order her to change course. So stuff your lying claim. TTYNA
Stupidity all around. No one involved should have done what they did. And that didn’t start with this incident. She should have known that noncompliance with police often results in death. The officers should known that they didn’t have to detain her at that moment. They also should have the idea of protect and defend. Officer safety uber alles is pure bullshit. Killing someone just for noncompliance is murder. He didn’t have to step or stay in front of the vehicle. It’s not like they wouldn’t have been able to find her. Both sides are symptoms of a broken culture, in a dying civilization.
Amazingly, you persist in intentionally obscuring the woman's guilt... emphasizing YOUR determination to reverse the obvious guilt of intending harm by repeatedly calling it ''fleeing'' while focusing on what the officer with the gun drawn can see... hiding that SHE COULD SEE HIM AS WELL and intended to use the car to cause whatever harm was needed in order to make her escape... 'distracted' does not preclude awareness of what's in progress.. Operating a vehicle in these circumstances does not excuse proceeding with full knowledge of what's in her path.
No cigar for twisting the account in order to reverse your valid aversion. TTYL
In respectful disagreement to part of your synopsis, I think that it is not fully clear that there was an opportunity that the ICE agent "could have jumped completely clear." Watching the footing of the two officers who physically interacted with the car reveals very slippery conditions (their feet slide on the ice). There is a nonzero probability that any quick movement would lead to a fall.
And falling, while standing right in front of an accelerating vehicle, can get you run over.
Also, in the split-second reaction, the threat of deterrence may have been what ran through the ICE agent's mind -- i.e., a driver may cease-and-desist (may stop hitting the gas) upon seeing a gun pointed at them.
Your interpretation of the event and her intent is very problematical and speculative. If we did not have illegal aliens in our country this might never have happened.
John I appreciate your honesty, intelligent and insightful breakdown of the facts and your conclusion. And surely she was not acting sensibly but she had the courage of her convictions. How anyone should think she should be murdered for her mistakes and with another woman and dog in the car demonstrates how far America has fallen but after the Disgusting Gaza Genocide it is sure no surprise. I believe there is intense CIA programming in the Minneapolis area. It seems you are to good a man to really see what was/is happening. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Biden's uncontrolled migration and now Trump's Gestapo Bully Thug tactics against the migrants AND AMERICANS is a planned recipe for disaster and likely much worse. I believe the Right/Left Uniparty Big Bosses knew the above was the way to get Americans to accept Military Control on our streets, subjugate and disarm Americans and turn America into a Total Police State with the help of Palantir.
We had the Plandemic, Bioweapon Jab including lock-downs under Trump's first Reign of Terror and carried through by idiot Biden, active ongoing Genocide of Defenseless (No: Army, Navy, Air Force, Artillery and little or no food, water, medical care etc) mostly Women and Children in the hundreds of thousands in Palestine by Netanyahu and Trump, we support ongoing Israeli Gestapo Tactics in the West under Trump and Trump tries to make Netanyahu look like a hero when he is a genocidal Mass Murderer and few Americans spoke out and the few who did were attacked and often jailed. Trump is annexing, attacking and threatening countries in a cavalier style following Hitlers MO. Do Americans realize this is wrong and will end in Disaster?
Well now we have Israeli tactics used against the Americans on our streets and as a very smart man said: 'As goes Palestine will be the way of the world', meaning governments will now use unfettered power and weapons against their own people. You have it now America and it only gets much worse including Martial Law, Active WW III in many locations and even Concentration Camps and worse. Trump is pitting 40% of Americans against 40% of Americans (Left/Right Paradigm BS) as it happened under his Rule in 2020 with the George Floyd disaster. The leader of a company or country is responsible for what happens under his watch whether he is directly responsible or not. Trump is directly responsible for most everything noted.
Biden was a Blackmailed Bribed Traitor Coward Clown and likely a Pedo but Trump is on a much higher level doing the Monsters unfettered bidding because he is a Blackmailed Bribed Traitor Coward Clown self-admittedly owned by Zionists Pedo scum who does what ever he wants guided only by "his own morals" which he obviously has none.
I'm sure I'll hear plenty from the Trump Bootlickers but they just show their ignorance.
When the very first video came out it looked like maybe it was a bad shoot & I told myself to wait for the body cam. I needed to see what he was seeing at the time. Before it was released I saw a podcaster break down the first video pausing at different increments. That is when I saw 2 facts I found important. The first being that it was easy to confuse the agent shooting with the other agent to his right & it was clearer how the shooting agent was moving. The 2nd was Goode’s left front tire. After she put her SUV in reverse & cocked her wheels, her tire lost traction, spun out when she punched it. That slowed down her initial exceleration when she punched the gas going forward. Her tire would not have lost traction if she was trying to leave at a safe speed. A day later the agent’s cell phone video was released. *NOTE: the agents do not have body cams because the previous administration severely cut I.C.E.’s budget right at the start of the Biden’s term & I believe at least 1 or 2 more times after that. The only agents who have body cams are the Quick Response Teams.* Carl Higbie on NewsMax, a former SEAL & very familiar with the training for approaching a vehicle & positioning the agents were using, ran through the video & froze it right before Goode punched the gas. She was looking dead straight at the agent, eye contact with a smirk when the agent again ordered her to stop & get out. then punches it. Her front tire loosing traction slowed down the force of which the SUV hit the agent. If not for that the agent would have been struck with even more force than he was. Instead of just injuries causing internal bleeding, he would have been far worse shape or dead. Of course I am not a forensics expert & I don’t claim to be. But when you look at all angles of the incident from above ground it would appear that agent was damn lucky & Goode was just plain foolish.
One more point that really pisses me off about Goode & her partner. Their dog was in the back seat. You’ll see that in the agent’s video. To bring loved ones that are precious, innocent & defenseless to situations with a high propensity for something bad to happen tells me both of them were pretty damn stupid. I hope that poor dog did not get hurt when she crashed or that it caught a bullet. I have seen it at so many “friendly protests” that are really just agitator rallies, babies in strollers, little kids that are only holding up signs mommy told them to hold up, dogs that could get hurt or even bite someone it perceives as dangerous. Leave the kids & pets at home!
Personally, I've had my fill of hysterical people causing endangerment to law enforcement with impunity. Witnessing the antics of "tolerated violence" by the likes of Antifa, Black Lives Matter, and their evil predecessors, Weather Underground, I have concluded that they represent an unreasonable, clear and present danger to civil society. I have personally sustained injuries, many times, because of people who did things which were illegal, malicious and I had to deal with the consequences OF THEIR ACTIONS. Notably, a disgruntled arsonist who set fire to a bakery, where I was injured fighting the fire, was able to act upon their flawed perceptions. This person was allowed to be free, receive public funds, paid expenses for counselling, free room and board, and to light fires. The woman who assaulted the officer with her vehicle has been held responsible for her actions, and will never harm another law enforcement officer.
This kind of behavior has been going on a long time...Remember when Patty Hearst was abducted by "radicals" and even was involved in a bank robbery? ...probably you don't as it was so long ago... few are still alive from that era... I think it was a group who called themselves THE WEATHERMEN...My memory is there was shooting involved in that also. I don't think that group got much punishment...
Thank you for the detailed breakdown. It is helpful.
I respect your desire to try and reach an objective viewpoint, without placing politics above empiricism, but one of the problems with the public trying to second guess officers actions is that in most cases they have absolutely no experiential basis for making judgements.
Here is one of the common misconceptions. Once the decision to shoot has been reached, it can only very rarely be avoided. It's why courts and disciplinary proceedings only judge the events up to and including the 'moment of threat'. In many states, the law states that courts are only allowed to evaluate the 'moment of threat', although a very, very recent 9-0 Supreme Court decision changes this- the events which lead up to the 'moment of threat' are now to be considered by courts in all states, not just some. I will link an article at the bottom.
Here's another problem. The fact that Renee Good didn't appear threatening actually makes the case better for the officer. This may seem absurd at face value, but in a legal sense it's entirely true. Although some may not like the laws governing ICE what is true is that ICE officers are allowed to arrest and detain citizens if citizens attempt to interfere or obstruct them in the pursuit of their lawful duties. It's clear that Renee Good did this. The officers were allowed to arrest and detain her, and once one understand this, one can also understand that it's not all unusual for any type of law enforcement officer to step in front of vehicle in order to prevent a somewhat compliant but reluctant citizen from fleeing the scene at speed in a vehicle once they realise that they've crossed a line and are about to be arrested.
The final problem is hindsight bias. We know what happened. We've seen the video. But neither Good nor the ICE officer had the benefit of hindsight. It obvious in this tragic incident that either of them anticipated what unfurled. If Renee Good had been aggressive and threatening, it was clear that she was going to attempt to flee a lawful arrest, and the officer then decided to step in front of the vehicle, with the natural result that this might cause him to shoot if she attempted to ram him, then this could have weighed against the ICE officer in subsequent court or disciplinary proceedings, because in some circumstances this could be construed as 'officer induced jeopardy'. But because Renee Good didn't give any obvious signals that she was going to try to leave the scene, stepping in front of the car so that an arrest could be made was an entirely reasonable thing to do.
Reports on X are now suggesting that the ICE officer suffered internal bleeding from the bump. If this is verified as true it makes it even more likely he won't suffer disciplinary sanctions or legal repercussion. It should also be noted that past empirical observations of use-of-force incidents show for an officer with a firearm holstered it takes between 1.8 and 2.5 for a well-trained officer to perform the physical actions which result from the 'moment of threat' and the decision to shoot. When the experts and/or courts come to judge the ICE officers actions they will be legally bound to only consider what happened roughly two seconds before the shooting took place, as well as the events which immediately preceded it.
Good essay. For a non-expert it was a solid attempt at objectivity.
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5301842-supreme-court-rules-on-police-force/
Regarding training there are 2 things: one these people are not trained worth a d..n. These are people being given about $50,000.00 to sign on. Further, these are people who have their own prejudices and hatred. They operate with the expectation of immunity for whatever they do. They do not believe in law and operate as Trump, no morality, no laws, only their own non-thinking bigotry. Wearing masks gives them a something to hide behind which further empowers them.
While I appreciate this writer's efforts to acknowledge his own biases/prejudices and try to observe independent of them (definitely a serious challenge for all of us), they still seep into his analysis of the situation. Audio of the woman and her wife clearly show they were not in any anger or hateful state. As many on the left, they strive to deal with spiritual kindness even when confronting hate. And it is a spiritual position. I wish those on the right would do the same. It would make mutual communication a much greater possibility that could help create a real popular front against the oligarchs that control both Parties and support the same imperialist goals. Tucker Carlson, with whom I have big disagreements. very correctly noted the rape of this country by these super wealthy moghuls with their goals of extraction of all resources of any country, especially our own. The industrial wastelands are a clear demonstration of this. This is Disaster Capitalism that Naomi Klein wrote about.
Thanks for your cogent observations. I have a question for you:
Is there any difference between "Disaster Capitalism" and "Venture Capitalism"?
Recently I have heard both these phrases used having never seen them before...of course the English language is a vast hodge podge of different times and places so no one person has "seen it all" ...but anyway--I am interested if you or anyone reading this has some comment about those two designations.
Kathleen, a decent definition of Disaster Capitalism comes from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace:
----------------------------------------
"The concept of “disaster capitalism,” coined by Naomi Klein in her book The Shock Doctrine in 2007, holds that conflicts, natural disasters, and other forms of crises create a propitious environment for political and economic elites to disempower and dispossess communities."
----------------------------------------
The key point is that it is utilized by politically-connected elites for the purpose of dispossession (i.e., confiscation/plundering of the private property of others). Like the term "crony capitalism" it is a contradiction-in-terms, because capitalism is a unique social system defined by Merriam-Webster as:
----------------------------------------
"an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market"
----------------------------------------
The point of disaster capitalism is that decision-making is centralized, like when the government used taxpayer dollars to bail out the big banks in the housing crisis of 2007-2009, letting regular people suffer in the process. Under actual capitalism, public officials never get to choose to pick winners and losers like that.
Venture capitalism is merely that part of capitalism involving being an early adopter in promising prospects, such as when the Wright brothers created flying machines ("airplanes"), even though people thought it impossible. Funding such entrepreneurial behavior before others have caught on to the inherent value is venture capitalism.
I think we have to wait for accident reconstruction experts and forensic pathologists to determine cause and manner of death. Of course, until that time, everyone is an expert. Even liberal arts majors who would not be allowed to apply to Medical School. W. Manion, MDPhDJDMBA Medical Examiner Forensic Pathologist, retired.
There exists no rule of law anymore. The police follow orders that are often skewed, prejudicially biased, political and even criminal.
John I must agree. Lots of cops shoot too quickly. How easy is it to find the criminal later if circumstances become too reckless.
.
ICE is acting like an invading and occupying military force, masked and armed, loosed upon a hostile population. Very much like the way the US military acted after the invasion and destruction of Iraq. How many times did US soldiers shoot and kill families in cars at roadblocks, after shouting instructions the driver couldn't understand? Always "perceiving" they were in danger? It's not surprising to learn that the ICE agent who shot Renee Good served in Iraq, part of that criminal invasion. This is imperialist thuggery, come home to roost. However mistaken she may have been in her reaction, shooting her in the head was beyond absurd. The agent could have jumped out of the way. John is right: if ICE wanted to arrest her, that could have easily been done later. Renee Good no more deserved to die than did Ashley Babbitt.
You are either intentionally deceiving or criminally insane.. Babbitt was not threatening the killer with a 4000lb weapon, nor any other... Nor did the killer make any attempt to order her to change course. So stuff your lying claim. TTYNA
Stupidity all around. No one involved should have done what they did. And that didn’t start with this incident. She should have known that noncompliance with police often results in death. The officers should known that they didn’t have to detain her at that moment. They also should have the idea of protect and defend. Officer safety uber alles is pure bullshit. Killing someone just for noncompliance is murder. He didn’t have to step or stay in front of the vehicle. It’s not like they wouldn’t have been able to find her. Both sides are symptoms of a broken culture, in a dying civilization.
Good analysis and explanation of bias.
Amazingly, you persist in intentionally obscuring the woman's guilt... emphasizing YOUR determination to reverse the obvious guilt of intending harm by repeatedly calling it ''fleeing'' while focusing on what the officer with the gun drawn can see... hiding that SHE COULD SEE HIM AS WELL and intended to use the car to cause whatever harm was needed in order to make her escape... 'distracted' does not preclude awareness of what's in progress.. Operating a vehicle in these circumstances does not excuse proceeding with full knowledge of what's in her path.
No cigar for twisting the account in order to reverse your valid aversion. TTYL
John,
In respectful disagreement to part of your synopsis, I think that it is not fully clear that there was an opportunity that the ICE agent "could have jumped completely clear." Watching the footing of the two officers who physically interacted with the car reveals very slippery conditions (their feet slide on the ice). There is a nonzero probability that any quick movement would lead to a fall.
And falling, while standing right in front of an accelerating vehicle, can get you run over.
Also, in the split-second reaction, the threat of deterrence may have been what ran through the ICE agent's mind -- i.e., a driver may cease-and-desist (may stop hitting the gas) upon seeing a gun pointed at them.
Your interpretation of the event and her intent is very problematical and speculative. If we did not have illegal aliens in our country this might never have happened.
John I appreciate your honesty, intelligent and insightful breakdown of the facts and your conclusion. And surely she was not acting sensibly but she had the courage of her convictions. How anyone should think she should be murdered for her mistakes and with another woman and dog in the car demonstrates how far America has fallen but after the Disgusting Gaza Genocide it is sure no surprise. I believe there is intense CIA programming in the Minneapolis area. It seems you are to good a man to really see what was/is happening. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Biden's uncontrolled migration and now Trump's Gestapo Bully Thug tactics against the migrants AND AMERICANS is a planned recipe for disaster and likely much worse. I believe the Right/Left Uniparty Big Bosses knew the above was the way to get Americans to accept Military Control on our streets, subjugate and disarm Americans and turn America into a Total Police State with the help of Palantir.
We had the Plandemic, Bioweapon Jab including lock-downs under Trump's first Reign of Terror and carried through by idiot Biden, active ongoing Genocide of Defenseless (No: Army, Navy, Air Force, Artillery and little or no food, water, medical care etc) mostly Women and Children in the hundreds of thousands in Palestine by Netanyahu and Trump, we support ongoing Israeli Gestapo Tactics in the West under Trump and Trump tries to make Netanyahu look like a hero when he is a genocidal Mass Murderer and few Americans spoke out and the few who did were attacked and often jailed. Trump is annexing, attacking and threatening countries in a cavalier style following Hitlers MO. Do Americans realize this is wrong and will end in Disaster?
Well now we have Israeli tactics used against the Americans on our streets and as a very smart man said: 'As goes Palestine will be the way of the world', meaning governments will now use unfettered power and weapons against their own people. You have it now America and it only gets much worse including Martial Law, Active WW III in many locations and even Concentration Camps and worse. Trump is pitting 40% of Americans against 40% of Americans (Left/Right Paradigm BS) as it happened under his Rule in 2020 with the George Floyd disaster. The leader of a company or country is responsible for what happens under his watch whether he is directly responsible or not. Trump is directly responsible for most everything noted.
Biden was a Blackmailed Bribed Traitor Coward Clown and likely a Pedo but Trump is on a much higher level doing the Monsters unfettered bidding because he is a Blackmailed Bribed Traitor Coward Clown self-admittedly owned by Zionists Pedo scum who does what ever he wants guided only by "his own morals" which he obviously has none.
I'm sure I'll hear plenty from the Trump Bootlickers but they just show their ignorance.
Gotta say my "like" Is from jsleel's gal cause we share email. That was just excellent. Truly excellent. Thanks.