Tulsi's conversion from skeptic of the national security state to pliant servant reminds me of Tom Tuttle from Tacoma, Washington in the 1985 film volunteers
“Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.”
–Sen. Charles Schumer, January 2017
A better explanation than being reminded of a comedy movie.
"Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite." - also from Eisenhower.
I don’t know your expertise with or knowledge about the intelligence community. Schumer has been in DC for a long time and this statement didn’t sound like idle talk. Particularly after all the stories regarding the Trump Russia collusion started coming out.
Tulsi Gabbard was sent an email in 2015 saying she had been chosen as a Young Global Leader and she sent them a tweet saying she was honored. She never had anything to do with them before or since.
My heart felt so heavy and filled with sadness when I read your post as I knew I was reading the truth. I believe Tulsi was and is the real deal…I believe they must have threatened her with real harm to her family. If you were told by powerful and evil people they would injure or kill your Mother (just picking a possibility here) what would you do? I did not believe in evil a year ago…..and now I do.
General Flynn is another psychological warfare officer (he actually wrote a text book on it) with a beltway reputation for skulduggery. He has also publically uttered a Luciferian prayer, and he has admitted orchestrating the Q psyop.
He's a deep state snake and a liar surrounded by other snakes and liars
I happen to know Tulsi and her dad Mike Gabbard. You are totally misjudging Tulsi’s position on all of this. I suspect that’s similar to your interpretation of these recent events. You don’t really know what is going on with Iran, John. You’re just a judgmental Panican, jack of all trades.
Brad, really does seem at times that John has succumbed to a mind virus (ala Gad Saad) much like Tucker Carlson. Both are, or becoming frenetic “panicans” so much so it’s hard to believe they are the same person. Reminiscent of those suffering from some version of pathological paranoia.
I too have wondered what is the pinch point that has converted Tulsi. Hypnosis never occurred in my thoughts but I would not discard it as a possibility. I do not think blackmail or some Epsteinian event would force her compliance as I feel her integrity is deeply rooted and she would face public shame rather than help destroy her country. Her life and past has been examined to no end by such powerful people such as Hillary Clinton, hell bent on ruining her. Life and death scenarios for her loved ones is my best guess but mind manipulation of some type has warrant.
You never see the faces or names of the real controllers. The public faces are all the Kabuki theatre actors playing out their parts. Remember whenever Rachael Madcow gets sued for slander she always wins in court because her defense is that hers' and all News shows are just Entertainment! They have writers, producers, directors and on camera actors reading scripts for our entertainment. We see the Congressional members quarrel for the camera and then attend each other's weddings, Christmas parties, etc. behind the scenes.
Some years back some motorcycling friends and I switched voter registration here in Florida from GOP to Dem only so we could vote for Tulsi in the primary contest. Obviously it changed nothing.
Now I see pictures of Tulsi with Adelson and Schmuley, 2 detestable creatures. The honeymoon is over Tulsi. She is not the woman I had thought she was.
You conclude this because she was in photographs with people you dislike?Were they guests at her home? On vacation together? Or at a political function where everyone is photographed with various administration members. This overshadows all of her other accomplishments and qualifications? Wow.
Well, along with the picture of Tulsi with those 2 enemies of the US is the fact that she threw Joe Kent under the bus. That is, she did not defend him in any way. I would be thrilled if she changed her position tomorrow, but I don't see it happening. She has gone over to the dark side. I have been a huge fan of hers for years, but people change as they get older. I could easily forgive her, but it would take a brave act on her part.
I’m skeptical of both your claims but you could be right. She won me over when she visited Syria as a congresswoman and pointed out the false narratives promoted by the US against Assad regarding gassing his own people, and while her name was on some WEF list, I think the list was indiviuals WEF wanted to recruit. She is not a psychologist and thus not likely in Psyops as her MOS.
Combat medics are enlisted men. At least that was the way it worked when I was in Vietnam. I appreciate your input, as I was very skeptical of the claim that she was in Psyops. I was an officer in a Helicopter Ambulance unit in Vietnam and held great respect for the combat medics. That was in the days of the draft, and the draft board did grant Conscientious Objector status to draftees. The Army put most CO into Combat Medic operations. Brave young men all, standing on their objection to killing people. I have long admired Tulsi for her bravery, and very disappointed in her switching to the Zionist side.
The military intelligence portion of her career appears now to have been scrubbed, or at least my quick search didn't turn anything up. Several years ago this was easily confirmed by both mainstream and alternative sources.
She was also brought up in one of those theosophist/new age cults (the Science of Identity foundation) which is another huge red flag.
"She continued to serve as a major in the Hawaii Army National Guard until her transfer to the 351st Civil Affairs Command, a California-based United States Army Reserve unit assigned to the United States Army Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command"
Good Lord. She didn’t participate in the WEF. Tulsi Gabbard was sent an email in 2015 saying she had been chosen as a Young Global Leader and she sent them a tweet saying she was honored. She never had anything to do with them before or since.
See my link above. That's her side of the story - but it's not quite that simple. As you note she gratefully acknowledged the award at the time which did not match her subsequent version of events and she did not acknowledge this until challenged.
She was (is?) also a member of CFR - which was/is the American side of the Rothschild/Rhodes/Milner group's British Roundtable secret society as documented by Professor Carroll Quigley (published posthumously owing to death threats).
Also worth asking what her denial is worth? There seem to be three possibilities
(1) She is a good person who did not apply for the YGL award.
(2) She is a good person who did apply for the YGL award not realizing what the WEF was.
(3) She is a bad person who did apply for the YGL award.
(4) She is a bad person who did not apply for the YGL award.
In each of scenarios (1), (3) and (4) she would deny applying for the award. Scenario 2 is ruled out because a good person does not lie. Her denial itself is basically meaningless in that it provides no new information - she would utter the denial whether it were true or not.
So - absent her meaningless denial - we are left only with the indisputable fact that she was listed on the WEF's web-site as a young global leader. And when you add
- her membership of CFR
- her theosophist cult affiliation
- her stint in military intelligence
- her current behavior
- the complete lack of corroborating evidence (e.g. as far as I am aware no-one else has ever mentioned that he was given the award without applying for / knowledge of it / attending the program)
then probability theory would suggest that ceteris paribus, she is much much more likely to be a bad person than a good one, and her denial is likely not true.
Why should she defend Kent, who was leaking to mainstream news and had already lost his intelligence clearance. Perhaps you should investigate Kent a bit deeper?
Because she and Joe were honorable in their criticism of “forever wars”, and they were correct. This action against Iran is just as criminal in every way and just as harmful and against US interests. Tulsi has become a huge hypocrite and apparently doesn’t even realize it. Joe has dignity and courage, she does not.
As for Joe, I'd suggest his own rather recent change of position is by far the more questionable. Seems like he's been one of the leakers from the Dept of War -
propaganda; all the skanks will come out of the woodwork to attack him. they'll just make stuff up. after all, he dared put to blame where the blame belongs and that, as we know, is the unforgivable sin
My favorite "leaker" from DoD is Daniel Ellsberg and Bradley Manning. Every patriot has a duty to expose the crimes of government. Joe is such a patriot, whether he "leaked" material or not.
Iran is not a ‘forever war’. It’s been TWO weeks. The point of the operation is to remove Iran’s ability to create havoc in the Middle East and the ability to fund Islamic terrorists throughout the world. It is not a regime change operation. There is a reason why Iranians are celebrating the US intervention. They have lived under a radical oppressive regime, and when the US/Israel is finished destroying the regimes weapons, will take back their country and form a government that supports its civilians.
Save the Zionist propaganda for Ted Cruz and Donald Trumpanyahu. I am immune to it, they are not. You are most gullible to buy into all that psychobabble.
Barnes reported that JD and Tulsi met with Kent before his resignation. That this meeting was to plot their course as minority America First in a sea of neocons running this administration. Tulsi says what she has to say to acquire and keep power. So the question is whether we as a nation and people are better off with people like her and JD in place or not. Should they just resign and leave the field entirely to the neocons? That will increase the risk of ground war and nuclear exchanges. So although I agree with John 99.9% of the time, on this one I give Tulsi a pass.
That is valid criticism, and I hope time will prove you right. However in these last few years I have come to realize that the Zionist Israeli State, and its accomplices in Washington DC political structure, are the enemy of the United States. Those who give aid and comfort to the enemy of the US are guilty of treason. Can she make it right by betraying the Zionists? Time will tell.
she should have quit when Trump said he wouldn't listen to her; she would have gotten out with her dignity. it's too late now. she's trashed her honor.
Sensory overload. Suggestive sensory inputs overwhelm the cognition. That's why video is so powerful. Describe a scene...yawn. Technicolor...shrink sessions.
Tulsi herself acknowledged that she had received the award, but claimed she did not attend any program, nor apply for the award. However the following may also be relevant
- upon receipt of the award she tweeted how grateful and honored she was to receive it
- she was also a member of CFR (the US branch of the Rothschild/Rhodes/Milner secret society)
At least that's her side of the story. Still she would say that wouldn't she?
Odd that no-one else seems to have talked about this (receiving the award without any prior knowledge of it) happening to them. Maybe she was the only person this happened to?
Participants in the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Young Global Leaders (YGL) program are not required to attend mandatory “classes” like a traditional academic course.The YGL is a leadership community for accomplished individuals under 40, selected through nominations and vetting, not open applications. It spans about six years and focuses on networking, events, and optional development activities rather than compulsory coursework.
You need to understand ho it works. People are invited to join the young global leaders program. That does not mean that they join it. Do you remember when the internet said Putin was in the program? LOL
Where's your evidence for this? As far as I am aware (perhaps I am wrong?) no-one else has talked about receiving the award without applying for it and/or attending...?
Is it just Tulsi who received this mysterious treatement?
A few years ago, internet ‘information’ was that Putin had been a young global leader. Remember? These assertions on the internet, from rando sources, are put there for a reason…..to influence you. It’s really that simple.
Not quite following you here. Are you saying that Putin (or anyone else) was listed on the WEF web-site as a young global leader, did actually receive the award, and has since claimed that he received it without any application, course or knowledge? If so this would be relevant to the Tulsi case
Or are you just saying that some randos spread an entirely false claim that Putin had once been a young global leader? If this is what you are saying it's not material.
I’m saying that at the beginning of the Russia/Ukraine conflict, the internet was full of pro-Ukraine and anti-Russia talking points and one of them was that Putin was a young global leader. Which was BS of course. As is the issue of Gabbard being one. Gabbard is getting in the way of corrupt intelligence operatives and operations, hence the push to make us feel negatively about her. You get the most flak when you’re over the target.
Highly unlikely. I’m sorry. Is your name in there? Why would you or anyone be a likely candidate, and how would you demand removal or refute your name to be on that list, if unwanted? Did that happen with Tulsi?
Here’s a thought. Try and see what Gabbard was doing or talking about when suddenly the internet began saying that she was a young global leader. That information is being put out there to discredit her. Don’t fall for it. She’s doing exactly was Trump wants her to do.
It didn't. Nobody gets a seat at that level without being compromised, side of the aisle notwithstanding. We are being greatly deceived by a political illusion and but a portion of a writ-large narrative matrix.
Could it be she answered in a way that keeps her in the administration to be able to express a different opinion to the current narrative? If she comes out blasting away her views won't be present to be heard.
This is possible. But she is mistaken if this is her reasoning. This would just be a form of "the end justifies the means", and that philosophy leads only to evil.
Tulsi has always proven herself to be little more than an unprincipled servant of the National Security State. She was a Co-Chair of the DNC. She's been a member of the CFR, and WEF "Young Global(ist) Leader". She worked with a PSYOPS unit, in the Military. She is NOT to be trusted, or taken at face value.
She's a huge Zionist and an islamophobic hawk, going way back. She theoretically opposed the US/Zionist/NATO Empire Al Qaeda "dirty war" in Syria - while repeating anti-Assad talking points, and never calling out the Oded Yinon plan strategy (for "Greater 'Israel'") and Imperial hegemonic connections to it.
She follows orders, not any recognizable conscience.
Tulsi Gabbard was sent an email in 2015 saying she had been chosen as a Young Global Leader and she sent them a tweet saying she was honored. She never had anything to do with them before or since. Internet BS can be incorrect
Interesting that you would parrot her narrative, seemingly without any independent critical thought... So let me ask you - WHY did they 'select' HER, in particular?
How about her involvement with America's Monoparty political establishment - The CFR? Did THEY just 'select' her, seemingly at random, as well?
What was her role in selling the Plandemic Lockdowns, and roll-out of the Mandatory Lethal Injections, in her position as a politician in Hawai'i? Was she opposed to the agenda that was being pushed from Davos...or was she instrumental in selling it to Hawaiians? What has consistently been her role, in selling the FRAUDULENT and physically impossible NeoCon Narrative, of "9/11"?
What do you know about the Mind Control Cult, that she was raised-in, on O'ahu's East Side?
That is certainly her side of the story which she only started telling once the whole thing became a problem for her. I have seen no evidence to corroborate her side of the story - and she has all sorts of other problematic affiliations, so I am not inclined to believe her version of events here.
A Perplexity search indicated she worked in Civil affairs, NOT PSYOPS. Do you have some verifiable links? See: "Tulsi Gabbard was not involved in Psyops during her military service. She served primarily as a civil affairs officer (in a medical support role) in Iraq and the Horn of Africa supporting special operations missions, earning a Combat Medical Badge in Iraq with the 29th Infantry Brigade’s medical battalion. She later became a lieutenant colonel and commanded the 1st Battalion, 354th Regiment (a civil affairs unit focused on humanitarian aid, civil-military engagement, and foreign relations in areas like Southeast Asia).Civil affairs involves building relationships with local populations and governments, which differs from Psyops’ focus on propaganda, media manipulation, and battlefield messaging.She has spoken to Psyops students at the Army’s John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center as a guest lecturer on topics like disinformation, drawing from her civil affairs experience and policy perspectives. This was in her Reserve capacity but does not indicate personal Psyops assignment."
I sincerely value and appreciate your and Dr. McCullough’s opinions Mr. Leake. Please know that I am not currently well informed on matters of politics, however, I know that there are many resources available to find such information. When it comes to trustworthy medical information though I feel Focal Points is absolutely unique and extraordinary. I ask (most respectfully and merely as a point of humble consideration) that you please consider keeping this platform focused on the medical information that is so vitally important right now.
What is the difference between medical tyranny under the pretext that we are being threatened by a virus that our own biosecurity establishment created and this constant PSYOP that has been waged against us since 2001 under the pretext that we are being threatened by Islamic regimes 7,000 miles away? I was a vocal minority during the pandemic and will continue to be a vocal minority against US federal power overreach in all its forms.
The operatives of that radical Islamic regime, 7000 miles away, are in the US as well as having cells throughout the world. Surely you cannot be this naive.
The threat of an Islamic regime is real John, the virus was not. Wake up. Or maybe one day you won’t wake up when the radicals who have threatened to kill you for years actually do so.
I can’t even imagine why you would think Tulsi has been converted. You John should know why after what we went through with COVID. Man I am not understanding your logic as of late.
I really loved loved reading John’s post during COVID and I had the rare opportunity of meeting him in Los Angeles at a Child’s Defense fundraiser in Los Angeles. But honestly of late, I have had enough of what I call, and that is just my opinion, as he has his, of his anti- America rhetoric. Maybe someday when the radical Islamics blow up America, there will be no one to tell the story of how we tried to stop it and so many people like John like all of us will be dead and gone.
“Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.”
–Sen. Charles Schumer, January 2017
A better explanation than being reminded of a comedy movie.
"Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite." - also from Eisenhower.
no possibility of this happening.
I don’t know your expertise with or knowledge about the intelligence community. Schumer has been in DC for a long time and this statement didn’t sound like idle talk. Particularly after all the stories regarding the Trump Russia collusion started coming out.
You are right. I stand corrected. I misread your comment.
No problem. I've misread too.
Either she has always been a great actress or they gave her an offer she couldn't refuse
She was a psychological warfare officer and WEF young global leader. Everything else was just a show so she could play her assigned role now.
Tulsi Gabbard was sent an email in 2015 saying she had been chosen as a Young Global Leader and she sent them a tweet saying she was honored. She never had anything to do with them before or since.
she is not completely stupid.
Both!
$$$, shut up, or else. It depends on how much you want to be part of the national national Lie.
My heart felt so heavy and filled with sadness when I read your post as I knew I was reading the truth. I believe Tulsi was and is the real deal…I believe they must have threatened her with real harm to her family. If you were told by powerful and evil people they would injure or kill your Mother (just picking a possibility here) what would you do? I did not believe in evil a year ago…..and now I do.
You read my mind. Remember what they did to General Flynn. They couldn’t find anything on him, so they went after his son.
General Flynn is another psychological warfare officer (he actually wrote a text book on it) with a beltway reputation for skulduggery. He has also publically uttered a Luciferian prayer, and he has admitted orchestrating the Q psyop.
He's a deep state snake and a liar surrounded by other snakes and liars
Where's Kanye?
I happen to know Tulsi and her dad Mike Gabbard. You are totally misjudging Tulsi’s position on all of this. I suspect that’s similar to your interpretation of these recent events. You don’t really know what is going on with Iran, John. You’re just a judgmental Panican, jack of all trades.
Brad, really does seem at times that John has succumbed to a mind virus (ala Gad Saad) much like Tucker Carlson. Both are, or becoming frenetic “panicans” so much so it’s hard to believe they are the same person. Reminiscent of those suffering from some version of pathological paranoia.
Did anyone actually listen to what Tulsi said today or is everyone taking John's opinion as fact?
Spytalk did a good review of the recent hearings, of Tulsi and Ratcliffe:
https://www.spytalk.co/p/gabbard-ratcliffe-struggle-with-iran
I too have wondered what is the pinch point that has converted Tulsi. Hypnosis never occurred in my thoughts but I would not discard it as a possibility. I do not think blackmail or some Epsteinian event would force her compliance as I feel her integrity is deeply rooted and she would face public shame rather than help destroy her country. Her life and past has been examined to no end by such powerful people such as Hillary Clinton, hell bent on ruining her. Life and death scenarios for her loved ones is my best guess but mind manipulation of some type has warrant.
Whatever got her the position in the first place. These people all follow orders, Trump included; the government is long captured.
You never see the faces or names of the real controllers. The public faces are all the Kabuki theatre actors playing out their parts. Remember whenever Rachael Madcow gets sued for slander she always wins in court because her defense is that hers' and all News shows are just Entertainment! They have writers, producers, directors and on camera actors reading scripts for our entertainment. We see the Congressional members quarrel for the camera and then attend each other's weddings, Christmas parties, etc. behind the scenes.
You may be right, my naïveté is a weakness.
We've all been duped into trusting them too much. To your credit, you're willing to admit it, which is a massive step forward most refuse to take.
Some years back some motorcycling friends and I switched voter registration here in Florida from GOP to Dem only so we could vote for Tulsi in the primary contest. Obviously it changed nothing.
Now I see pictures of Tulsi with Adelson and Schmuley, 2 detestable creatures. The honeymoon is over Tulsi. She is not the woman I had thought she was.
You conclude this because she was in photographs with people you dislike?Were they guests at her home? On vacation together? Or at a political function where everyone is photographed with various administration members. This overshadows all of her other accomplishments and qualifications? Wow.
Well, along with the picture of Tulsi with those 2 enemies of the US is the fact that she threw Joe Kent under the bus. That is, she did not defend him in any way. I would be thrilled if she changed her position tomorrow, but I don't see it happening. She has gone over to the dark side. I have been a huge fan of hers for years, but people change as they get older. I could easily forgive her, but it would take a brave act on her part.
She was a psychological warfare officer and a WEF young global leader. What did you expect? How many times can they fool you before it stops working?
I’m skeptical of both your claims but you could be right. She won me over when she visited Syria as a congresswoman and pointed out the false narratives promoted by the US against Assad regarding gassing his own people, and while her name was on some WEF list, I think the list was indiviuals WEF wanted to recruit. She is not a psychologist and thus not likely in Psyops as her MOS.
She was a combat medic, not a psychologist, and advanced to the rank of Lt. Col, which is quite an achievement.
Combat medics are enlisted men. At least that was the way it worked when I was in Vietnam. I appreciate your input, as I was very skeptical of the claim that she was in Psyops. I was an officer in a Helicopter Ambulance unit in Vietnam and held great respect for the combat medics. That was in the days of the draft, and the draft board did grant Conscientious Objector status to draftees. The Army put most CO into Combat Medic operations. Brave young men all, standing on their objection to killing people. I have long admired Tulsi for her bravery, and very disappointed in her switching to the Zionist side.
As far as I am aware the claims are, or at least once were, not controversial.
Here's a piece on the WEF thing - starts with her denials but shows her grateful acknowledgement of the "honor" at the time:
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/has-tulsi-gabbard-adequately-addressed-the-wef-young-global-leader-question/
The military intelligence portion of her career appears now to have been scrubbed, or at least my quick search didn't turn anything up. Several years ago this was easily confirmed by both mainstream and alternative sources.
She was also brought up in one of those theosophist/new age cults (the Science of Identity foundation) which is another huge red flag.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/why-former-followers-her-guru-145242761.html
https://forum.culteducation.com/read.php?12,4453,page=1
OK - psyops role - found it on wikipedia:
"She continued to serve as a major in the Hawaii Army National Guard until her transfer to the 351st Civil Affairs Command, a California-based United States Army Reserve unit assigned to the United States Army Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsi_Gabbard?ysclid=mmwr6szsuh572420151
Good Lord. She didn’t participate in the WEF. Tulsi Gabbard was sent an email in 2015 saying she had been chosen as a Young Global Leader and she sent them a tweet saying she was honored. She never had anything to do with them before or since.
See my link above. That's her side of the story - but it's not quite that simple. As you note she gratefully acknowledged the award at the time which did not match her subsequent version of events and she did not acknowledge this until challenged.
She was (is?) also a member of CFR - which was/is the American side of the Rothschild/Rhodes/Milner group's British Roundtable secret society as documented by Professor Carroll Quigley (published posthumously owing to death threats).
Also worth asking what her denial is worth? There seem to be three possibilities
(1) She is a good person who did not apply for the YGL award.
(2) She is a good person who did apply for the YGL award not realizing what the WEF was.
(3) She is a bad person who did apply for the YGL award.
(4) She is a bad person who did not apply for the YGL award.
In each of scenarios (1), (3) and (4) she would deny applying for the award. Scenario 2 is ruled out because a good person does not lie. Her denial itself is basically meaningless in that it provides no new information - she would utter the denial whether it were true or not.
So - absent her meaningless denial - we are left only with the indisputable fact that she was listed on the WEF's web-site as a young global leader. And when you add
- her membership of CFR
- her theosophist cult affiliation
- her stint in military intelligence
- her current behavior
- the complete lack of corroborating evidence (e.g. as far as I am aware no-one else has ever mentioned that he was given the award without applying for / knowledge of it / attending the program)
then probability theory would suggest that ceteris paribus, she is much much more likely to be a bad person than a good one, and her denial is likely not true.
Why should she defend Kent, who was leaking to mainstream news and had already lost his intelligence clearance. Perhaps you should investigate Kent a bit deeper?
Because she and Joe were honorable in their criticism of “forever wars”, and they were correct. This action against Iran is just as criminal in every way and just as harmful and against US interests. Tulsi has become a huge hypocrite and apparently doesn’t even realize it. Joe has dignity and courage, she does not.
As for Joe, I'd suggest his own rather recent change of position is by far the more questionable. Seems like he's been one of the leakers from the Dept of War -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vllCZVQtfQA
propaganda; all the skanks will come out of the woodwork to attack him. they'll just make stuff up. after all, he dared put to blame where the blame belongs and that, as we know, is the unforgivable sin
My favorite "leaker" from DoD is Daniel Ellsberg and Bradley Manning. Every patriot has a duty to expose the crimes of government. Joe is such a patriot, whether he "leaked" material or not.
Iran is not a ‘forever war’. It’s been TWO weeks. The point of the operation is to remove Iran’s ability to create havoc in the Middle East and the ability to fund Islamic terrorists throughout the world. It is not a regime change operation. There is a reason why Iranians are celebrating the US intervention. They have lived under a radical oppressive regime, and when the US/Israel is finished destroying the regimes weapons, will take back their country and form a government that supports its civilians.
Save the Zionist propaganda for Ted Cruz and Donald Trumpanyahu. I am immune to it, they are not. You are most gullible to buy into all that psychobabble.
does your crystal ball tell you so?
you have the wrong country as the havoc creator.
Kent threw himself under the bus.
Barnes reported that JD and Tulsi met with Kent before his resignation. That this meeting was to plot their course as minority America First in a sea of neocons running this administration. Tulsi says what she has to say to acquire and keep power. So the question is whether we as a nation and people are better off with people like her and JD in place or not. Should they just resign and leave the field entirely to the neocons? That will increase the risk of ground war and nuclear exchanges. So although I agree with John 99.9% of the time, on this one I give Tulsi a pass.
That is valid criticism, and I hope time will prove you right. However in these last few years I have come to realize that the Zionist Israeli State, and its accomplices in Washington DC political structure, are the enemy of the United States. Those who give aid and comfort to the enemy of the US are guilty of treason. Can she make it right by betraying the Zionists? Time will tell.
she should have quit when Trump said he wouldn't listen to her; she would have gotten out with her dignity. it's too late now. she's trashed her honor.
Sensory overload. Suggestive sensory inputs overwhelm the cognition. That's why video is so powerful. Describe a scene...yawn. Technicolor...shrink sessions.
I remember her name being on the list of those who had attended WEF school. I had hoped she had escaped unscathed. Clearly not.
We have to give up hope of the answer coming from within the system.
Gabbard never attended ‘WEF school’.
I double checked. Tulsi was in the WEF “young global leaders program”.
LOL…Link your source
Google it.
LOL…so no source. Got it.
Tulsi herself acknowledged that she had received the award, but claimed she did not attend any program, nor apply for the award. However the following may also be relevant
- upon receipt of the award she tweeted how grateful and honored she was to receive it
- she was also a member of CFR (the US branch of the Rothschild/Rhodes/Milner secret society)
- she was brought up in a theosophist cult.
At least that's her side of the story. Still she would say that wouldn't she?
Odd that no-one else seems to have talked about this (receiving the award without any prior knowledge of it) happening to them. Maybe she was the only person this happened to?
Participants in the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Young Global Leaders (YGL) program are not required to attend mandatory “classes” like a traditional academic course.The YGL is a leadership community for accomplished individuals under 40, selected through nominations and vetting, not open applications. It spans about six years and focuses on networking, events, and optional development activities rather than compulsory coursework.
Have you seen the politicians who were “young leaders”? It’s a compilation of monsters.
You are chosen by the WEF, but being chosen doesn’t mean that you participate.
One would hope but Tulsi’s recent performances suggest otherwise.
Take a look at who went to the WEF young leader program. It’s a who’s who of global shit bags
You need to understand ho it works. People are invited to join the young global leaders program. That does not mean that they join it. Do you remember when the internet said Putin was in the program? LOL
Where's your evidence for this? As far as I am aware (perhaps I am wrong?) no-one else has talked about receiving the award without applying for it and/or attending...?
Is it just Tulsi who received this mysterious treatement?
A few years ago, internet ‘information’ was that Putin had been a young global leader. Remember? These assertions on the internet, from rando sources, are put there for a reason…..to influence you. It’s really that simple.
Not quite following you here. Are you saying that Putin (or anyone else) was listed on the WEF web-site as a young global leader, did actually receive the award, and has since claimed that he received it without any application, course or knowledge? If so this would be relevant to the Tulsi case
Or are you just saying that some randos spread an entirely false claim that Putin had once been a young global leader? If this is what you are saying it's not material.
I’m saying that at the beginning of the Russia/Ukraine conflict, the internet was full of pro-Ukraine and anti-Russia talking points and one of them was that Putin was a young global leader. Which was BS of course. As is the issue of Gabbard being one. Gabbard is getting in the way of corrupt intelligence operatives and operations, hence the push to make us feel negatively about her. You get the most flak when you’re over the target.
So her name appeared on the WEF roster without her consent or training time/affiliation?
People are invited to join. Your name may be indicated due to that invitation, but it doesn’t meant that you participate.
Highly unlikely. I’m sorry. Is your name in there? Why would you or anyone be a likely candidate, and how would you demand removal or refute your name to be on that list, if unwanted? Did that happen with Tulsi?
Here’s a thought. Try and see what Gabbard was doing or talking about when suddenly the internet began saying that she was a young global leader. That information is being put out there to discredit her. Don’t fall for it. She’s doing exactly was Trump wants her to do.
Indeed.
It didn't. Nobody gets a seat at that level without being compromised, side of the aisle notwithstanding. We are being greatly deceived by a political illusion and but a portion of a writ-large narrative matrix.
Could it be she answered in a way that keeps her in the administration to be able to express a different opinion to the current narrative? If she comes out blasting away her views won't be present to be heard.
This is possible. But she is mistaken if this is her reasoning. This would just be a form of "the end justifies the means", and that philosophy leads only to evil.
Yes, William, I think she's keeping her blasting powder dry and reserved for the right time.
Tulsi has always proven herself to be little more than an unprincipled servant of the National Security State. She was a Co-Chair of the DNC. She's been a member of the CFR, and WEF "Young Global(ist) Leader". She worked with a PSYOPS unit, in the Military. She is NOT to be trusted, or taken at face value.
She's a huge Zionist and an islamophobic hawk, going way back. She theoretically opposed the US/Zionist/NATO Empire Al Qaeda "dirty war" in Syria - while repeating anti-Assad talking points, and never calling out the Oded Yinon plan strategy (for "Greater 'Israel'") and Imperial hegemonic connections to it.
She follows orders, not any recognizable conscience.
Tulsi Gabbard was sent an email in 2015 saying she had been chosen as a Young Global Leader and she sent them a tweet saying she was honored. She never had anything to do with them before or since. Internet BS can be incorrect
Interesting that you would parrot her narrative, seemingly without any independent critical thought... So let me ask you - WHY did they 'select' HER, in particular?
How about her involvement with America's Monoparty political establishment - The CFR? Did THEY just 'select' her, seemingly at random, as well?
What was her role in selling the Plandemic Lockdowns, and roll-out of the Mandatory Lethal Injections, in her position as a politician in Hawai'i? Was she opposed to the agenda that was being pushed from Davos...or was she instrumental in selling it to Hawaiians? What has consistently been her role, in selling the FRAUDULENT and physically impossible NeoCon Narrative, of "9/11"?
What do you know about the Mind Control Cult, that she was raised-in, on O'ahu's East Side?
That is certainly her side of the story which she only started telling once the whole thing became a problem for her. I have seen no evidence to corroborate her side of the story - and she has all sorts of other problematic affiliations, so I am not inclined to believe her version of events here.
A Perplexity search indicated she worked in Civil affairs, NOT PSYOPS. Do you have some verifiable links? See: "Tulsi Gabbard was not involved in Psyops during her military service. She served primarily as a civil affairs officer (in a medical support role) in Iraq and the Horn of Africa supporting special operations missions, earning a Combat Medical Badge in Iraq with the 29th Infantry Brigade’s medical battalion. She later became a lieutenant colonel and commanded the 1st Battalion, 354th Regiment (a civil affairs unit focused on humanitarian aid, civil-military engagement, and foreign relations in areas like Southeast Asia).Civil affairs involves building relationships with local populations and governments, which differs from Psyops’ focus on propaganda, media manipulation, and battlefield messaging.She has spoken to Psyops students at the Army’s John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center as a guest lecturer on topics like disinformation, drawing from her civil affairs experience and policy perspectives. This was in her Reserve capacity but does not indicate personal Psyops assignment."
This is not correct. She was attached to the psychological operations division - even wikipedia reports this.
"Civil Affairs", in the Military, is a euphemism for "CIA". Unlike Military PSYOPS work - the CIA doesn't announce theirs.
I sincerely value and appreciate your and Dr. McCullough’s opinions Mr. Leake. Please know that I am not currently well informed on matters of politics, however, I know that there are many resources available to find such information. When it comes to trustworthy medical information though I feel Focal Points is absolutely unique and extraordinary. I ask (most respectfully and merely as a point of humble consideration) that you please consider keeping this platform focused on the medical information that is so vitally important right now.
What is the difference between medical tyranny under the pretext that we are being threatened by a virus that our own biosecurity establishment created and this constant PSYOP that has been waged against us since 2001 under the pretext that we are being threatened by Islamic regimes 7,000 miles away? I was a vocal minority during the pandemic and will continue to be a vocal minority against US federal power overreach in all its forms.
The operatives of that radical Islamic regime, 7000 miles away, are in the US as well as having cells throughout the world. Surely you cannot be this naive.
Jan, is one of these cells in the room with you right now, perhaps under your bed?
(Iraqi WMD v2.0)
The threat of an Islamic regime is real John, the virus was not. Wake up. Or maybe one day you won’t wake up when the radicals who have threatened to kill you for years actually do so.
Neither threat was/is real. The only threat comes from the evil men who rule the world and the shadowy groups through which they operate.
thank you for that. i find it interesting that people are now telling you to "stay in your lane" as if your "lane" is limited to vaccines
Is there a link to Tulsi's testimony today?
I found this: https://x.com/RealLindellTV/status/2034313545459060983?s=20
I imagine the threat of a personalized drone on a family member or other loved one would cause a significant loss of morale.
I can’t even imagine why you would think Tulsi has been converted. You John should know why after what we went through with COVID. Man I am not understanding your logic as of late.
I really loved loved reading John’s post during COVID and I had the rare opportunity of meeting him in Los Angeles at a Child’s Defense fundraiser in Los Angeles. But honestly of late, I have had enough of what I call, and that is just my opinion, as he has his, of his anti- America rhetoric. Maybe someday when the radical Islamics blow up America, there will be no one to tell the story of how we tried to stop it and so many people like John like all of us will be dead and gone.