mRNA has the potential to cure cancer, and even blindness. It was the rushed testing and introduction that was the problem. Now that it’s been widely tested on humans, pharma has no excuse - but they would have to admit culpability…
".. While some final-stage contracts (e.g., Arcturus and Amplitude) will be allowed to run their course to preserve prior taxpayer investment, no new mRNA-based projects will be initiated. .."
More evidence how bad this is I only got one shot of the two shots I needed and I didn’t think I was ever gonna work again for three days. I had all kinds of symptoms.
To obtain public health data, the public has to resort to FOI process, to obtain critical information pertaining to "vaccines", which the public paid for, which were mandated on the public, which "vaccines" caused many unnecessary deaths of citizens. In a "democracy". Disgraceful.
It was mandatory, and they did not have a choice to comply. Particularly in a high cost of living environment. No shelter, no food, which you euphemistically describe as "financially damaging".
If a robber puts a gun to your head and gives you a choice between handing over your purse or having your brains blown out, you're free to choose, right? You hand the robber your purse, and thank him for your freedom to choose. Good luck with that.
I don't see "financially damaging" as a euphemism. It is, in fact, exactly what happened to those who chose their health over their money.
Your analogy doesn't hold up. If you chose to give up the job, no one was going to blow your brains out. The opposite was true. You could choose to sacrifice your health for the opportunity to work for the coercive employer.
Not having your brains immediately blown out doesn't mean that you (and/or your family) will be able to survive the loss of income. It's just a long, drawn-out painful death for you and your loved ones that you get to "choose."
"Not mandatory" is an effectively meaningless phrase for many, many people.
I was severely injured, too (2021), and although I was told a year ago that I was “doing better,” one can’t help but wonder what this weapon is doing to their cells ..
Health stems from eating nutritious food, which feeds the organs and cells...Injecting matter, which does not belong in the human body will injure and destroy it. The Mindset of the Medical Industry is sell products...health be damned. All doctors really need to be re-educated and taught how the human body really works. Good health stems from feeding it as our Creator intended...not processed food. It stems from living a healthy lifestyle. Hippocrates, the Father of Medicine, 2400 years ago promoted nutrition and healthy living in order for people to get well and stay well. Ingesting toxic drugs or Injecting foreign matter into the human bloodstream causes disease. People have to become aware that these products destroy health. The Medical System has failed us and a true Health Care System needs to replace it.
Found 13,290 cases where Location is U.S. States and Vaccine is COVID19 or COVID19-2 and Patient Died
for in total 1,665,735 VAERS REGISTERED applicants who took all the covid jabs, including boosters.
It is best to run that script in expert mode.
ALso what was NOT ENOUGH stressed here, is that case of the politician with cancer, where Masako explicitly states HIS STEM CELLS HAD THE SPIKE CODE IN THEM, which means, he got PERMANENTLY GENETICALLY MODIFIED, i.e. he is no more the son of his parents!!!!! Dr. McKernan stated similar results but not mentioning the stem cells, this case is thus the DEFINITE ANSWER, as to what gene therapy does, OVERWRITES THE HUMAN GENOME!!!!!!!
But just recently the other KEvin, McCairn mentioned that stem cells are being able to affect the white clots forming in blood vessels of the jabbed. The richest source of human stem cells is human urine, according to Dr. Ed Group III. He is trying to apply the Urine therapy for his patients..., Stem cells must have a 'center' from which they stem and it seems the urine contains all the necesary parts which allows their growth and strong multiplication.
Hi--has anyone here read/listened to todays article from the Lies are Unbekoming substack. Tom Cowan is in the video attached. It featured a viewpoint from a now deceased (November 2024) Italian Nobel Nominee Dr. Stefano Scoglio that has a very different opinion around this health crisis post vaccination. Apparently there are 55 undeclared ingredients in the vaccine and one esp troublesome ingredient mimics antifreeze. It sounds like this thought process might be gaining some traction in the scientific realm. I am a simple layman --but I do wonder if its possible we are chasing the wrong lead--by design?
Why isn't anyone doing the fundamental comparison for every country on earth: what was the population before the mRNA bioweapon rollout & what is it today?! This is the only question that really matters.
Variables involved. Normal die off numbers, births, massive flow of immigrants masking population numbers. Plus getting accurate data in today’s world is a near impossibility.
I understand. There has already been documentation of the huge excess numbers of deaths. The mRNA platform also causes infertility - add that data on miscarriages and both male & female infertility.
Are illegal immigrants counted as part of the population? If so, in what countries? Not only have the US forever wars in the Middle East and Africa created massive numbers of refugees in Europe but it includes the Caucasus and Central Asia into Russia. Not to mention the massive numbers of refugees from US destruction in Central and South America.
All of these factors need to be compiled into comprehensible analyses of the whole. We know that this is all part of the globalist ruling class' depopulation agenda.
Thank you so very much for reporting on these findings. Horrifying, but an amazingly strong data set. The Citizens group had an inspired and inspiring strategy for gathering the data in one place. Brilliant!
I wonder how the situation is in Israel?? High vaccination rate there as well. But maybe all the batches used for these people were without the mRNA deathly toxin.
Synthetic "toxin". Why'd they withhold the sterilizing jabs from the Palestinians? Those Zionists seem to prefer occupation, demolition, starvation, and shooting!
In the plot that went viral, the reason why the deaths go up for about 120 days is that there's a low number of deaths in the first few months after vaccination because of the healthy vaccinee effect. The reason why the deaths start to drop after about 120 days is that people cycle back to day 0 after they get a new vaccine dose.
If you made a plot of deaths by days since the last haircut, there would probably be more deaths on day 100 than day 300, because by day 300 many people have gotten a new haircut so they have cycled back to day 0.
The first plot you posted shows all doses added together, and in the second plot the green rings show doses 1-5 added together, and the other points show doses 1-5 individually. The first plot says that it shows deaths "per capita annually" (and another translation of the plot says that the plot employs the "person-years method").
However I suspect the mortality rates in the first plot may have been calculated incorrectly, so that people with multiple doses were not counted multiple times in the denominator, because the plot looks very similar to the second plot, which shows raw deaths that are not adjusted for population size. Both plots have about 5 times higher mortality on day 120 than day 360.
I you look at the bottom of this page, there's a plot for deaths by days since vaccination that is not adjusted for population size, where there's about 4 times more deaths on day 120 than day 360: https://stop-mrna.sakura.ne.jp/db/lot_totalization.php. It has a similar shape to the first plot you posted, which I think shouldn't be the case if the first plot was properly adjusted for population size.
If the mortality rates were calculated correctly, the ratio between day 120 and day 360 shouldn't be nearly as high as 5, or at least it's not nearly as high in Barry Young's New Zealand dataset or the Czech record-level datasets. But a ratio of 4 to 5 is rather consistent with a plot of raw deaths not adjusted for population size.
Kenji Fujikawa published individual-level FOI data for the city of Koganei, which includes a total of 131,936 people and 4,349 deaths: https://medicalfacts.info/vdeath.rb (link at the bottom).
When I used the Koganei data to calculate a crude mortality rate by weeks since vaccination for doses 1-7 added together, my mortality rate remained around the same level from week 20 until week 60, so there was nowhere near a 5-fold drop between day 120 and day 360: https://sars2.net/statistic2.html#Deaths_by_days_since_vaccination_in_Japan. The mortality rate only started to drop after about 60 weeks, which was because there was a big drop in the average age of vaccinated people. When I plotted an age-standardized mortality rate instead of a crude mortality rate, the mortality rate remained around the same level even after 60 weeks.
I also used the Koganei data to calculate deaths by weeks since vaccination as a percentage of baseline deaths. I calculated the baseline by multiplying the number of person-days for each combination of age group and observation month with the mortality rate of all people included in the dataset for the same combination of age group and observation month. There was only about 21% of the expected number of deaths on the first week from vaccination, 46% the second week, 54% the third week, and so on, so that the percentage roughly followed an exponential function with the formula `93-62*exp(-10*x)`: https://sars2.net/rootclaim5.html#HVE_test_for_KCOR. It took about 40 weeks after vaccination for the curve to flatten out.
In the two plots you posted, the reason why the mortality peaks before week 40 is that many people got a new vaccine dose less than 40 weeks from their previous dose. The reason why the deaths peaked later for dose 2 than dose 3 is because the average time between doses 2 and 3 was longer than the average time between doses 3 and 4 (about 234 vs 171 days in the Koganei data). The deaths already peak around week 3 for dose 1, because most people got a second dose 3 to 6 weeks after the first dose, so then they cycled back to day 0 and their deaths were no longer counted under dose 1.
I am so very grateful to all these Japanese volunteers for their work. That the uptake of the next round has been overwhelming snubbed has got to be deeply gratifying. Think of the good they have put into this world, the lives they have saved.
And thank you Nicholas for sharing the good news of the true being told!!!!!
Bobbie Kennedy just cancelled all mRNA contracts with BARDA. So he says.
Thank God!
Why not just ban all mRNA shots?! He can cancel all the contracts he want but if research continues then what's the point??
mRNA has the potential to cure cancer, and even blindness. It was the rushed testing and introduction that was the problem. Now that it’s been widely tested on humans, pharma has no excuse - but they would have to admit culpability…
It's a medical procedure. Should not be done at pharmacies and street vans. How do these alleged "vaccines" cure cancer or blindness?
YES! Every single one must be banned out of existence.
Hopefully --this means Canada will soon follow-
There is an agreement called the Multiple Recognition Agreement.
For pharmaceutical companies, once they get approval in the country where it is easiest to get approval, they are invincible.
This means that if one country approves a drug or food product, all other signatory countries will approve the product.
This exempts each country's regulatory authority from liability if another country's judgment is incorrect, and there is no need for testing.
MRA signatory countries: United States, Australia, Canada, Israel, Japan, Germany, Italy, New Zealand, Switzerland, Sweden, Latvia, Litania,
Cyplos, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania
https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory-overview/research-development/compliance-research-development/good-manufacturing-practice/mutual-recognition-agreements-mra
Explanation by Sasha Latipova
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/mutual-recognition-agreements-remove?publication_id=870364
Holy Crapp.
I have wondered for years why Australia, for one, just follows whatever our damn FDA approves. . . Now, we finally know-- MRA.
Thank you Fujii-san. Excellent post.
Except the self- replicating one?
".. While some final-stage contracts (e.g., Arcturus and Amplitude) will be allowed to run their course to preserve prior taxpayer investment, no new mRNA-based projects will be initiated. .."
Many, but not all...
https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/hhs-terminates-22-mrna-vaccine-projects?publication_id=520511&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=o86e9&utm_medium=email
More evidence how bad this is I only got one shot of the two shots I needed and I didn’t think I was ever gonna work again for three days. I had all kinds of symptoms.
Mark, how are you doing now?
Thanks for revisiting this important finding from Japan, Nic. And thanks to Masako for explaining it all.
In the USA, there was also a peak in all-cause mortality at 50 - 140 days after the COVID shot injections, as I wrote about at: [ https://deepd1ve.substack.com/p/belated-excess-deaths ]
To obtain public health data, the public has to resort to FOI process, to obtain critical information pertaining to "vaccines", which the public paid for, which were mandated on the public, which "vaccines" caused many unnecessary deaths of citizens. In a "democracy". Disgraceful.
So what about the mandates? Mandates, shmandates!
https://americasbestpics.com/picture/mandate-legal-definition-blacks-law-dictionary-11th-ed-mandate-4-vOWnF1KB9
From a retired professor at the University of Michigan 2023/8/24 Duration: 1:57
https://rumble.com/v3b5ib2-mandates-are-not-law-we-do-not-comply.html
Tell that to the people whose livelihoods were axed because they did not comply with the experimental injection mandates.
Mandates are just recommendations. You have a choice whether to accept the recommendation, but not the HR edicts. Quit misusing the term "mandate"!
It wasn't mandatory if they had a choice not to comply. It was financially damaging.
Doch! (Au contraire, ma dame!) Don't act on recommendations or advice if you consider them damaging.
It was mandatory, and they did not have a choice to comply. Particularly in a high cost of living environment. No shelter, no food, which you euphemistically describe as "financially damaging".
If a robber puts a gun to your head and gives you a choice between handing over your purse or having your brains blown out, you're free to choose, right? You hand the robber your purse, and thank him for your freedom to choose. Good luck with that.
I don't see "financially damaging" as a euphemism. It is, in fact, exactly what happened to those who chose their health over their money.
Your analogy doesn't hold up. If you chose to give up the job, no one was going to blow your brains out. The opposite was true. You could choose to sacrifice your health for the opportunity to work for the coercive employer.
Not having your brains immediately blown out doesn't mean that you (and/or your family) will be able to survive the loss of income. It's just a long, drawn-out painful death for you and your loved ones that you get to "choose."
"Not mandatory" is an effectively meaningless phrase for many, many people.
Which is it, already? Mandatory, or no choice?
I was admitted to hospital 4 months after 2nd jab with heart failure.
I was severely injured, too (2021), and although I was told a year ago that I was “doing better,” one can’t help but wonder what this weapon is doing to their cells ..
Did eating pineapple or other protease sources help?
Health stems from eating nutritious food, which feeds the organs and cells...Injecting matter, which does not belong in the human body will injure and destroy it. The Mindset of the Medical Industry is sell products...health be damned. All doctors really need to be re-educated and taught how the human body really works. Good health stems from feeding it as our Creator intended...not processed food. It stems from living a healthy lifestyle. Hippocrates, the Father of Medicine, 2400 years ago promoted nutrition and healthy living in order for people to get well and stay well. Ingesting toxic drugs or Injecting foreign matter into the human bloodstream causes disease. People have to become aware that these products destroy health. The Medical System has failed us and a true Health Care System needs to replace it.
.
Truth.
For Nicolas, from VAERS (https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php):
Found 13,290 cases where Location is U.S. States and Vaccine is COVID19 or COVID19-2 and Patient Died
for in total 1,665,735 VAERS REGISTERED applicants who took all the covid jabs, including boosters.
It is best to run that script in expert mode.
ALso what was NOT ENOUGH stressed here, is that case of the politician with cancer, where Masako explicitly states HIS STEM CELLS HAD THE SPIKE CODE IN THEM, which means, he got PERMANENTLY GENETICALLY MODIFIED, i.e. he is no more the son of his parents!!!!! Dr. McKernan stated similar results but not mentioning the stem cells, this case is thus the DEFINITE ANSWER, as to what gene therapy does, OVERWRITES THE HUMAN GENOME!!!!!!!
But just recently the other KEvin, McCairn mentioned that stem cells are being able to affect the white clots forming in blood vessels of the jabbed. The richest source of human stem cells is human urine, according to Dr. Ed Group III. He is trying to apply the Urine therapy for his patients..., Stem cells must have a 'center' from which they stem and it seems the urine contains all the necesary parts which allows their growth and strong multiplication.
Hi--has anyone here read/listened to todays article from the Lies are Unbekoming substack. Tom Cowan is in the video attached. It featured a viewpoint from a now deceased (November 2024) Italian Nobel Nominee Dr. Stefano Scoglio that has a very different opinion around this health crisis post vaccination. Apparently there are 55 undeclared ingredients in the vaccine and one esp troublesome ingredient mimics antifreeze. It sounds like this thought process might be gaining some traction in the scientific realm. I am a simple layman --but I do wonder if its possible we are chasing the wrong lead--by design?
Why isn't anyone doing the fundamental comparison for every country on earth: what was the population before the mRNA bioweapon rollout & what is it today?! This is the only question that really matters.
Variables involved. Normal die off numbers, births, massive flow of immigrants masking population numbers. Plus getting accurate data in today’s world is a near impossibility.
I understand. There has already been documentation of the huge excess numbers of deaths. The mRNA platform also causes infertility - add that data on miscarriages and both male & female infertility.
Are illegal immigrants counted as part of the population? If so, in what countries? Not only have the US forever wars in the Middle East and Africa created massive numbers of refugees in Europe but it includes the Caucasus and Central Asia into Russia. Not to mention the massive numbers of refugees from US destruction in Central and South America.
All of these factors need to be compiled into comprehensible analyses of the whole. We know that this is all part of the globalist ruling class' depopulation agenda.
Thank you so very much for reporting on these findings. Horrifying, but an amazingly strong data set. The Citizens group had an inspired and inspiring strategy for gathering the data in one place. Brilliant!
Hellloooo USA !! Admit to the data
His japan's mass media publicizing these findings?
Call it what it is. Genocide by variable batches.
I wonder how the situation is in Israel?? High vaccination rate there as well. But maybe all the batches used for these people were without the mRNA deathly toxin.
Synthetic "toxin". Why'd they withhold the sterilizing jabs from the Palestinians? Those Zionists seem to prefer occupation, demolition, starvation, and shooting!
In the plot that went viral, the reason why the deaths go up for about 120 days is that there's a low number of deaths in the first few months after vaccination because of the healthy vaccinee effect. The reason why the deaths start to drop after about 120 days is that people cycle back to day 0 after they get a new vaccine dose.
If you made a plot of deaths by days since the last haircut, there would probably be more deaths on day 100 than day 300, because by day 300 many people have gotten a new haircut so they have cycled back to day 0.
The first plot you posted shows all doses added together, and in the second plot the green rings show doses 1-5 added together, and the other points show doses 1-5 individually. The first plot says that it shows deaths "per capita annually" (and another translation of the plot says that the plot employs the "person-years method").
However I suspect the mortality rates in the first plot may have been calculated incorrectly, so that people with multiple doses were not counted multiple times in the denominator, because the plot looks very similar to the second plot, which shows raw deaths that are not adjusted for population size. Both plots have about 5 times higher mortality on day 120 than day 360.
I you look at the bottom of this page, there's a plot for deaths by days since vaccination that is not adjusted for population size, where there's about 4 times more deaths on day 120 than day 360: https://stop-mrna.sakura.ne.jp/db/lot_totalization.php. It has a similar shape to the first plot you posted, which I think shouldn't be the case if the first plot was properly adjusted for population size.
If the mortality rates were calculated correctly, the ratio between day 120 and day 360 shouldn't be nearly as high as 5, or at least it's not nearly as high in Barry Young's New Zealand dataset or the Czech record-level datasets. But a ratio of 4 to 5 is rather consistent with a plot of raw deaths not adjusted for population size.
Kenji Fujikawa published individual-level FOI data for the city of Koganei, which includes a total of 131,936 people and 4,349 deaths: https://medicalfacts.info/vdeath.rb (link at the bottom).
When I used the Koganei data to calculate a crude mortality rate by weeks since vaccination for doses 1-7 added together, my mortality rate remained around the same level from week 20 until week 60, so there was nowhere near a 5-fold drop between day 120 and day 360: https://sars2.net/statistic2.html#Deaths_by_days_since_vaccination_in_Japan. The mortality rate only started to drop after about 60 weeks, which was because there was a big drop in the average age of vaccinated people. When I plotted an age-standardized mortality rate instead of a crude mortality rate, the mortality rate remained around the same level even after 60 weeks.
I also used the Koganei data to calculate deaths by weeks since vaccination as a percentage of baseline deaths. I calculated the baseline by multiplying the number of person-days for each combination of age group and observation month with the mortality rate of all people included in the dataset for the same combination of age group and observation month. There was only about 21% of the expected number of deaths on the first week from vaccination, 46% the second week, 54% the third week, and so on, so that the percentage roughly followed an exponential function with the formula `93-62*exp(-10*x)`: https://sars2.net/rootclaim5.html#HVE_test_for_KCOR. It took about 40 weeks after vaccination for the curve to flatten out.
In the two plots you posted, the reason why the mortality peaks before week 40 is that many people got a new vaccine dose less than 40 weeks from their previous dose. The reason why the deaths peaked later for dose 2 than dose 3 is because the average time between doses 2 and 3 was longer than the average time between doses 3 and 4 (about 234 vs 171 days in the Koganei data). The deaths already peak around week 3 for dose 1, because most people got a second dose 3 to 6 weeks after the first dose, so then they cycled back to day 0 and their deaths were no longer counted under dose 1.
Thanks for providing important context for data interpretation.
I am so very grateful to all these Japanese volunteers for their work. That the uptake of the next round has been overwhelming snubbed has got to be deeply gratifying. Think of the good they have put into this world, the lives they have saved.
And thank you Nicholas for sharing the good news of the true being told!!!!!
♥️