17 Comments
User's avatar
Kerri larson mandick's avatar

Gates should be banned from. Public health

MK Maynard's avatar

Gates should be banned from life.

Neil Pryke's avatar

The net is tightening round the perpetrators of the SARS-CoV-2 scam...Keep up the good work..!

SoloD's avatar

PREAMBLE

TODAY it is a well-known and easily demonstrable fact that the members of the US Congress

and the State Legislatures do not read, evaluate or debate any of the particulars of the Legislation

they vote on.

They cannot read or debate the issues because on average, NINE THOUSAND new bills are

introduced each year at a rate of fifty-five per day and each Bill can approach 500 pages of

content or more.

Since no one can evaluate THIRTY THOUSAND pages of Law Speak per day, the elected

representative is forced to vote “as per the suggestion of staff”.

Our Constitutions call for ‘representative government of the people, by the people and for the

people’. They do not call for ‘government by staff (permanent bureaucracy) recommendation’.

THEREFORE

In order to remedy the UNCONSTITUTIONAL WORKING OF THE GOVERNMENT, it is

time to use the available technology of computers for the distribution of the text, and artificial

intelligence (AI) for the aggregation of the decisions of up to FIFTY THOUSAND interested,

responsible and qualified Citizens per Congressional district, herein referred to as AMPLIFIED

VOTERS (AV) to give The People and all of Humanity the opportunity to solve their

Governmental problems.

PROPOSAL

A Constitutional Amendment to Accommodate at Up to 50 Thousand Citizen Representatives

per Congressional District Who Will Actually Read and Evaluate the Existing and Proposed

Laws for the Purpose of Ratification or Annulment of Each and Every Line of Law and the

Accompanying Enabling Legislation for the Purpose of Perfecting The Law for and in Behalf of

The Citizens of the Country.

Each AV will “read” at least approximately ten pages of the existing law or proposed bill, and

indicate “ratification, annulment or further clarification required” of each line/sentence of text.

Artificial Intelligence will aggregate the results in real time to ratify or annul the whole.

Enforcement cannot be effected without ratification.

PutativePathogen's avatar

I applaud the framework. I don't believe that, at this time in history, we have that many citizens who are educated in civics, aligned in their values, and motivated to forward the effort towards righting the ship.

I DO believe, however, that we can start the process in earnest to create such citizens.

Godspeed.

Rich Becker's avatar

Thanks for laying this out so clearly and succinctly

albert venezio's avatar

Courageous Exposure John - Thank you!

PutativePathogen's avatar

The WHO as an intelligence agency. John, that took my breath away. It's now so obvious.

Peter Krone's avatar

What happens next when Bill Gates will use AI supported political and WHO planning (while he owns the WHO), to his project to reduce the world population? Will the civilians of the world be smart enough to detect his intent, derail his plans and be able to counter his actions?

Hannah's avatar

And this at the same time the democrats boycotted a congressional hearing examining a CIA whistleblower who discussed Fauci’s interventions to conceal the origins of C19, and the University of Bath has announced human clinical trials in late 2026 of its vaccine for “not yet pandemic-level” human-to-human transmissible hantavirus cases. And the beat goes on.

Cheryl's avatar

Gates needs to be tried along with the rest- foundations and charities should all be treated as businesses- we don’t need money laundering schemes to take us down w/pharma and health. Great analogy w/manson🤣 the world is run by dirty clowns

Debra Nolasco's avatar

Dr. Tess Lawrie talks with Del Bigtree re: The WHO's Collaborative Centers around the world, of which 70 exist in the U.S.https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/p/dr-tess-lawrie-on-the-highwire-as?r=9er3b&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web

MK Maynard's avatar

Florence Nightingale was right when she said there is no such thing as a virus, there is only bacteria. Of course she was right, no virus has ever been isolated. Bryan Ardis is also correct when he translates the latin 'virus' to english, meaning poison, primarily snake venom. G of F is poison, and I have no doubt if the hantavirus can spread between humans, it has been enhanced in a lab, no doubt by Sheng Xi Lee in Wuhan and Ralph Baric at UNC Chappel Hill, and funded by the US DoD, just like Covid 19.

Om's avatar

Excellent! Thank you for sharing this testimony.

Geoff Wexler's avatar

Sending Daszak to Wuhan is like sending EcoHealth's #2 guy Andrew Huff to investigate the US Food Plant self sabotage explosions:

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20140288995A1/en #18 on

https://WHOtoSTOP.org

Or promoting the fake whistleblower as a budding author. Lord, please enact your vengeance on the lying lips authors and reward the true authors & truthtellers.

Gerry's avatar
7mEdited

The opening line is a perfect metaphor.

Alernatively, it's like asking Allen Dulles to investigate the JFK assassination.

Oh, wait! That's what actually happens.