Infant rats exposed to “safe” cell phone radiation levels suffered impaired neuronal development and disrupted brain chemistry, while parallel in-vitro tests showed DNA damage in neural stem cells.
FedGov has long known the biological harms of non-ionizing radiation, and intentionally hid them. If the records haven't long ago since been destroyed, one day they will come to light.
Correct. They don't mention all the other radiation that is naturally occurring. Cell phone is about one watt of radio frequency. Radio stations put out 100 W and people commonly stand right next to their microwave putting out 1 cm higher energy radiation of 1500 W. How about the power supply on your 15 W screw base LED? I'm not worried about my cell phone and I use it on speakerphone anyways. We should be more worried about all the other poisons we are voluntarily ingesting.
Here in Canada , we have safety code 6, which is a joke. Seriously outdated, which is in their favor, not protecting humanity. I believe it was put in effect before all the increase in emr: cell phone and towers, smart everything: meters for hydro, wifi in homes and businesses.
My philosophy: better safe than sorry. The industry should have to follow the guideline of DO NO HARM. Whether its chemicals in food and water, radiation or cars that don’t have proper breaks. We are consumers depending on the gov bodies to regulate.
The confounding of the psychometric instrument (endorsed by WHO/UNICEF) used to evaluate neonatal and childhood neuro-development is not controlled for the schedule of neonatal and childhood vaccinations. The neuro-developmental consequences are therefore concealed AND further, baked in going forward. They are quite blind to the neuro-developmental consequences of vaccination, as indeed they are to EMF. EMF appears an adverse influence on neurobiology, but its effects are also irretrievably confounded by vaccination and used as a cover for vaccines.
Almost no one is listening or paying attention.
Little wonder then 1:31 autistic and hardly a squeak.
In the past, I have seen advertising with parents letting their small children hold cell phones to their ears...and it disturbed me. I thought to myself this is so wrong. People need to be warned of the danger of unseen radiation, not promote it. I got along all my life without a cell phone...and don't want one. I do have a landline. Many people have developed brain tumors from cellphone radiation by holding the phone close to the ear. Children sitting close to a TV playing video games are getting their brains radiated, too. Electronics have deadly side effects that more people should know about, if they want to be healthy.
🤣 EMF going directly into your brain there. I’m no expert but lately I’ve read that we need to keep our headphones wired. Who the heck really knows?? Nonetheless, I laugh because I feel like it’s a lose-lose scenario.
After all, the concealment and baking in of neuro-developmental consequences of vaccination by the WHO/UNICEF is the de rigueur act of a constellation of interests that continue to promote, deflect and distract from the vaccine mammoth in the room?
I do not see where anyone has fingered the use of a standardised neuro-developmental psychometric instrument (uncontrolled against vaccines) of the (Ages and Stages Questionnaire® (ASQ®)-3) that is used internationally to conceal and bake in endemic adverse neuro-developmental consequences of the schedule of the neonatal and childhood schedule of vaccination?
Thae Amish kids are the control group, are they not?
Before 1986 a standard option for parents, consistent with human immunology, was to start vaccinations after 12 months of age.
Our kids were born in 1989 and later, but many docs I worked with still went by that, as did we with our 4 kids. They are fine.
The information is available for individuals to protect their children, even if a societal turning is only slowly beginning, and could still be thwarted.
Our grandchildren are being cared for thoughtfully, also.
I’m sure there are millions and millions of American babies who sleep next to a monitor- let’s do a human study to prove the harm. It’s well past time to do so!!!!
I either use AI glasses and keep the cell phone at a distance or if I'm not wearing AI glasses I put calls on speaker and keep the cell phone at a distance. I also don't take mRNA shots. Would that provide some protection?
The newest ones have in-lens display so you can check messages, preview photos, see translations, and get help from AI without needing to pull out your phone. They can convert speech to text on your phone. There are cameras at the edge of the lenses so you can take photos or videos without having to pull out your phone. (I haven't used this function yet). If the phone rings AI will talk to you and you can hear the caller through your glasses and carry on a conversation without having to pull out your phone.
They come "with a full-color, high-resolution display that’s there when you want it — and gone when you don’t. The display is placed off to the side, so it doesn’t obstruct your view. And it isn’t on all the time — it’s designed for short interactions that you’re always in control of. This isn’t about strapping a phone to your face. It’s about helping you quickly accomplish some of your everyday tasks without breaking your flow.
It’s the first product that takes microphones, speakers, cameras, and a full-color display backed with compute and AI — and puts it all together in a single device ..."
We humans have a preponderance of polluting our environment with all sorts of electromagnetic frequencies and radiation at higher levels that we’ve not been exposed to until recently. Radiation does make physiological changes to our bodies that can be damaging. The way we overcome this is by our cells making new proteins to change cellular functions to bring us into harmony with the environmental changes that we ourselves created. These new proteins cannot come from the DNA we were born with. The message to make these new proteins must come from somewhere else. It’s possible that virus particles from nature, not labs, contain these messages. If you’re convinced that virus particles do exist, watch this video from minute 29:35, otherwise watch the whole thing and keep an open mind. https://rumble.com/v3tafrv-do-viruses-exist.html
FedGov has long known the biological harms of non-ionizing radiation, and intentionally hid them. If the records haven't long ago since been destroyed, one day they will come to light.
Never. The impossible can never come to light. Like vaccine adjuvants being "safe and effective". That's impossible! Myth Busted: Tesla's Motors Have 100X less EMF than a wall socket https://teslaleaks.com/f/myth-busted-teslas-motors-have-100x-less-emf-than-a-wall-socket
So does intramuscular injection.....brain damage, as well.. autism, etc... the list is long....
Correct. They don't mention all the other radiation that is naturally occurring. Cell phone is about one watt of radio frequency. Radio stations put out 100 W and people commonly stand right next to their microwave putting out 1 cm higher energy radiation of 1500 W. How about the power supply on your 15 W screw base LED? I'm not worried about my cell phone and I use it on speakerphone anyways. We should be more worried about all the other poisons we are voluntarily ingesting.
Life is a minefield with all the dangers people face on a daily basis. Ignorance is not bliss!
You mean the radiation from the Sun? Why aren't you all dead yet? Myth Busted: Tesla's Motors Have 100X less EMF than a wall socket https://teslaleaks.com/f/myth-busted-teslas-motors-have-100x-less-emf-than-a-wall-socket
🎯💯
Remember the speed guns police used that caused cancer to lap area,because in between use,they would set device in their lap?
Here in Canada , we have safety code 6, which is a joke. Seriously outdated, which is in their favor, not protecting humanity. I believe it was put in effect before all the increase in emr: cell phone and towers, smart everything: meters for hydro, wifi in homes and businesses.
My philosophy: better safe than sorry. The industry should have to follow the guideline of DO NO HARM. Whether its chemicals in food and water, radiation or cars that don’t have proper breaks. We are consumers depending on the gov bodies to regulate.
Hulscher [?intentionally, deflecting or distracting] while ignoring the mammoth in the room....The Camouflaged Tools of War?
The Great BigPharma 'Bake-Off' ... https://drlatusdextro.substack.com/p/the-camouflaged-tools-of-war
The confounding of the psychometric instrument (endorsed by WHO/UNICEF) used to evaluate neonatal and childhood neuro-development is not controlled for the schedule of neonatal and childhood vaccinations. The neuro-developmental consequences are therefore concealed AND further, baked in going forward. They are quite blind to the neuro-developmental consequences of vaccination, as indeed they are to EMF. EMF appears an adverse influence on neurobiology, but its effects are also irretrievably confounded by vaccination and used as a cover for vaccines.
Almost no one is listening or paying attention.
Little wonder then 1:31 autistic and hardly a squeak.
I am very aware of and have frequently reported on the horrendous neurodevelopmental harms of childhood hyper-vaccination.
Well. They are baby rats? How do you quantify the comparable amount? Stating this before finishing your article. Give me grace if you addressed it.
In the past, I have seen advertising with parents letting their small children hold cell phones to their ears...and it disturbed me. I thought to myself this is so wrong. People need to be warned of the danger of unseen radiation, not promote it. I got along all my life without a cell phone...and don't want one. I do have a landline. Many people have developed brain tumors from cellphone radiation by holding the phone close to the ear. Children sitting close to a TV playing video games are getting their brains radiated, too. Electronics have deadly side effects that more people should know about, if they want to be healthy.
Horse to water, and all of that.
Some will be cautious, most will scoff. So be it.
This is why I use earbuds.
🤣 EMF going directly into your brain there. I’m no expert but lately I’ve read that we need to keep our headphones wired. Who the heck really knows?? Nonetheless, I laugh because I feel like it’s a lose-lose scenario.
This makes the cut for my next blog post.
Thank You, Nicolas.
If that's the case JD, then how about considering, The Great BigPharma 'Bake-Off' ... https://drlatusdextro.substack.com/p/the-camouflaged-tools-of-war. ?
After all, the concealment and baking in of neuro-developmental consequences of vaccination by the WHO/UNICEF is the de rigueur act of a constellation of interests that continue to promote, deflect and distract from the vaccine mammoth in the room?
We are already on the same page. See my most recent post here, and scroll to the last few excerpts and links, which is where I keep democidal bioweapon news. https://www.johndayblog.com/2025/09/will-it-be-official.html
Excellent.
I do not see where anyone has fingered the use of a standardised neuro-developmental psychometric instrument (uncontrolled against vaccines) of the (Ages and Stages Questionnaire® (ASQ®)-3) that is used internationally to conceal and bake in endemic adverse neuro-developmental consequences of the schedule of the neonatal and childhood schedule of vaccination?
Thae Amish kids are the control group, are they not?
Before 1986 a standard option for parents, consistent with human immunology, was to start vaccinations after 12 months of age.
Our kids were born in 1989 and later, but many docs I worked with still went by that, as did we with our 4 kids. They are fine.
The information is available for individuals to protect their children, even if a societal turning is only slowly beginning, and could still be thwarted.
Our grandchildren are being cared for thoughtfully, also.
I’m sure there are millions and millions of American babies who sleep next to a monitor- let’s do a human study to prove the harm. It’s well past time to do so!!!!
Myth Busted: Tesla's Motors Have 100X less EMF than a wall socket https://teslaleaks.com/f/myth-busted-teslas-motors-have-100x-less-emf-than-a-wall-socket
I either use AI glasses and keep the cell phone at a distance or if I'm not wearing AI glasses I put calls on speaker and keep the cell phone at a distance. I also don't take mRNA shots. Would that provide some protection?
They probably rely on Bluetooth? Anything Bluetooth is emitting EMF? So the glasses maybe aren’t great? Idk.
Thanks. I'll have to look into it. I haven’t had them long.
What are AI glasses? Sincerely asking. Have eye issues.
The newest ones have in-lens display so you can check messages, preview photos, see translations, and get help from AI without needing to pull out your phone. They can convert speech to text on your phone. There are cameras at the edge of the lenses so you can take photos or videos without having to pull out your phone. (I haven't used this function yet). If the phone rings AI will talk to you and you can hear the caller through your glasses and carry on a conversation without having to pull out your phone.
They come "with a full-color, high-resolution display that’s there when you want it — and gone when you don’t. The display is placed off to the side, so it doesn’t obstruct your view. And it isn’t on all the time — it’s designed for short interactions that you’re always in control of. This isn’t about strapping a phone to your face. It’s about helping you quickly accomplish some of your everyday tasks without breaking your flow.
It’s the first product that takes microphones, speakers, cameras, and a full-color display backed with compute and AI — and puts it all together in a single device ..."
Wow! Amazing! I did not know this at all. Thank you! Very helpful.
We humans have a preponderance of polluting our environment with all sorts of electromagnetic frequencies and radiation at higher levels that we’ve not been exposed to until recently. Radiation does make physiological changes to our bodies that can be damaging. The way we overcome this is by our cells making new proteins to change cellular functions to bring us into harmony with the environmental changes that we ourselves created. These new proteins cannot come from the DNA we were born with. The message to make these new proteins must come from somewhere else. It’s possible that virus particles from nature, not labs, contain these messages. If you’re convinced that virus particles do exist, watch this video from minute 29:35, otherwise watch the whole thing and keep an open mind. https://rumble.com/v3tafrv-do-viruses-exist.html
Anyone here not use a cell phone?