27 Comments
User's avatar
Mary Lou Tringali, PhD's avatar

This is important. I’d like to know about where the study took place, what the sample was, and if they had a control group. We all should be aware that everyone is being affected by radiation. We also know children are much more susceptible to harmful effects.

Expand full comment
Mary Lou Tringali, PhD's avatar

I have an electromagnetic radiation tester. You can go around your house or office and easily see even your phone and remote controls are all emitting various levels of radiation. ☢️

Expand full comment
HardeeHo's avatar

As you note we are surrounded by electromagnetic fields even from satellites passing by. Measuring those fields is nontrivial. Detecting requires an array of suitable antennas. Doubt “meters” are all that capable but sell well to consumers. Hard to filter out the 60hz stuff from our home wiring. And hard to shield that low frequency stuff. Higher frequencies can’t penetrate much but do scatter a lot. Reflective multi path remains the cell phone dilemma. Hard to get away from that.

There is a EMF quiet place in WV but few wish to live there.

Expand full comment
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

Wifi and Cell phones are not 'radiation".

Expand full comment
HardeeHo's avatar

Not radiation? Perhaps not radioactive but electromagnetic radiation as noted. Seems a possible issue that bears further study.

Expand full comment
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

It's not radiation of any sort. Just because something radiates, doesn't mean it's radiation. Besides, 5G is non-ionizing and 6/1,000,000 of 1 watt. How would you intend on proving that 6/1,000,000 of 1 watt can hurt you, when there's more of an electric field coming from your light bulbs and the Sun. Maybe the only safe place is 5 miles deep in one of Alex Jonesenstein's coal mines, with a bottle of his D3 "Rat Poison" because his viewers melt in the Sun. I think the massive EMF blasting off of the spark plugs in your gas car needs to be investigated.

Expand full comment
Mary Lou Tringali, PhD's avatar

Great sense of humor!

Expand full comment
Mary Lou Tringali, PhD's avatar

Get a device and check it out for yourself.

Expand full comment
Leynia's avatar

Glad to have these articles. About smart meters, what to DO is my question. I pay $20/month to have one meter read in person rather than being beeped. (I am far from being a high income person.) The other meter is just outside my much-used kitchen. There is no option tfor an in-person reading, not that I could afford it. Any suggestions?

Expand full comment
DaughteroftheKing's avatar

About a year ago, I watched a video with Dr. Tenpenny interviewing Cory Hills. At that time, one of the products his company provides is easily installed on the outside of your home and provides protection for your whole house.

(I have been meaning to check out his website and just haven't had a chance to do so.)

CORY HILLIS

PRESIDENT OF EMF SOLUTIONS INC

CERTIFIED EMF SPECIALIST & TRAINER

emfsol.com

Expand full comment
Leynia's avatar

Wow, Daughter of the King, thank you! I will look into this.

Expand full comment
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

Yes. Cover your entire house with Tin Foil.

Expand full comment
Rick McCarthy, LMFT's avatar

Very alarming. Thank you for relaying this information.

Expand full comment
Steve Glaiser's avatar

[using a "Scott Adams" style filter] -- What group(s) funded the study? We're sociological factors (dumping devices in kids laps as babysitters, etc) tracked? At what rates of exposure(s) over what frequency of contact were factored into the study? I'm not knocking the study at all (i've had my share of extra high EMF exposure(s) in the US Air Force so i get it) - just wanna ensure the study isn't targeting something for a specific outcome / influence...

Expand full comment
Michael's avatar

It’s hard to avoid. Look how long we were exposed before anything was ever said about it. I don’t know how good it does but I now sleep with my phone on airplane mode, the alarm still works but no constant searching for towers. And I unplug my wifi router every night and day when I remember.

Expand full comment
Angel Kinzie's avatar

It was a concern to me, that while I was

Watching this excellent, but long exposure on radiation dangers, Nicholas had two earbuds in use! These are supposed to be the equivalent of microwaving your brain! Please don't use them!

Expand full comment
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

What "radiation"? Your microwave is equivalent to microwaving your brain.

Expand full comment
Barbara Charis's avatar

My daughter bought a copper unit, which the company said could protect the whole home from radiation.. I did have someone use a device to check how much EMF exposure there was...and he said that there was very little. People should have no electronic devices in their bedrooms or children's rooms.

Expand full comment
Ernie's avatar

To your knowledge, are their studies being performed in various school environments around the country? Asking for a friend.

Expand full comment
HardeeHo's avatar

Unclear if higher frequencies cause as much potential harm. Their radiation typically remains less penetrating than current WiFi. OTOH will need more source devices for good coverage.

Hard to imagine living without our electronics but may become necessary. We are nearly always on our devices.

Expand full comment
Carol Porter's avatar

Baby monitors are also a huge source of the problem.

Expand full comment
Laurie Lang's avatar

Is this the reason that many of these towers are located next to schools?

Knowling...

Expand full comment
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

Really? I just read a story on how your microwave disrupts your Wifi and how the spark plugs in your car disrupt your cell phone. But, it's the cell phone that's the problem? Myth Busted: Tesla's Motors Have 100X less EMF than a wall socket https://teslaleaks.com/f/myth-busted-teslas-motors-have-100x-less-emf-than-a-wall-socket

Expand full comment
David 1260's avatar

Thank you for reporting on EMFs. I've long predicted that EMF lawsuits will be far bigger than the tobacco litigation. Studies like this one tend to not get funded because of pressure from telecoms. There's big money in wireless everything--with no cognizance whatsoever of the health effects. Personally, I use Ethernet and wired earbuds, but I live in a sea of WiFi...

Expand full comment
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

Really? I just read a story on how your microwave disrupts your Wifi and how the spark plugs in your car disrupt your cell phone. But, it's the cell phone that's the problem? Myth Busted: Tesla's Motors Have 100X less EMF than a wall socket https://teslaleaks.com/f/myth-busted-teslas-motors-have-100x-less-emf-than-a-wall-socket

Expand full comment
sandy's avatar

The Pentagon is ready use humans in self spreading vaccine trials.

https://slaynews.com/news/pentagon-secretly-advancing-self-spreading-vaccine-development-documents-reveal/

Expand full comment
DaughteroftheKing's avatar

About a year ago, I watched a video with Dr. Tenpenny interviewing Cory Hills. At that time, one of the products his company provided is easily installed on the outside of your home and provides protection for your whole house.

(I have been meaning to check out his website and just haven't had a chance to do so.)

CORY HILLIS

PRESIDENT OF EMF SOLUTIONS INC

CERTIFIED EMF SPECIALIST & TRAINER

emfsol.com

Expand full comment