64 Comments
User's avatar
Mary Lou Tringali, PhD's avatar

This is important. I’d like to know about where the study took place, what the sample was, and if they had a control group. We all should be aware that everyone is being affected by radiation. We also know children are much more susceptible to harmful effects.

Expand full comment
Mary Lou Tringali, PhD's avatar

I have an electromagnetic radiation tester. You can go around your house or office and easily see even your phone and remote controls are all emitting various levels of radiation. ☢️

Expand full comment
HardeeHo's avatar

As you note we are surrounded by electromagnetic fields even from satellites passing by. Measuring those fields is nontrivial. Detecting requires an array of suitable antennas. Doubt “meters” are all that capable but sell well to consumers. Hard to filter out the 60hz stuff from our home wiring. And hard to shield that low frequency stuff. Higher frequencies can’t penetrate much but do scatter a lot. Reflective multi path remains the cell phone dilemma. Hard to get away from that.

There is a EMF quiet place in WV but few wish to live there.

Expand full comment
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

Wifi and Cell phones are not 'radiation".

Expand full comment
HardeeHo's avatar

Not radiation? Perhaps not radioactive but electromagnetic radiation as noted. Seems a possible issue that bears further study.

Expand full comment
Mary Lou Tringali, PhD's avatar

Great sense of humor!

Expand full comment
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

It's not radiation of any sort. Just because something radiates, doesn't mean it's radiation. Besides, 5G is non-ionizing and 6/1,000,000 of 1 watt. How would you intend on proving that 6/1,000,000 of 1 watt can hurt you, when there's more of an electric field coming from your light bulbs and the Sun. Maybe the only safe place is 5 miles deep in one of Alex Jonesenstein's coal mines, with a bottle of his D3 "Rat Poison" because his viewers melt in the Sun. I think the massive EMF blasting off of the spark plugs in your gas car needs to be investigated.

Expand full comment
Doc C's avatar

Btw, you speak of "Alex Josenstein" and "tin foil hats" , and yet: do you believe in viruses?

Expand full comment
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

The words "believe" doesn't appear anywhere in 26,000 pages of publications.

Expand full comment
HardeeHo's avatar

Thankfully the spark plug wires are encased in a metal box. But it’s mighty noisy inside that box.

Not sure we can “prove” anything given our current tool sets. But the cited study ought to give us pause. Infants might be a decent subject for analyses given they aren’t biased yet.

Understand about potential public fears regarding “radiation” but electric and magnetic fields surround us with benefits/costs not fully understood. But we keep adding more to make our lives better, we think.

Expand full comment
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

It is well understood. Without electricity, all your cells would die. That's what all the aluminum, mercury in vaccines and lithium and fluoride pills for children do to your body, turns it into a battery, while causing all your neurons to fail, and your brain into a Zombie. Nikola Tesla on Electrified Schoolroom to Brighten Dull Pupils "I am convinced that the high-frequency current has no deleterious effect; that, on the contrary, it is positively beneficial, and that the experimental tests should be and in all probability will be carried out in the Fall.” https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/articles/nikola-tesla-electrified-schoolroom-brighten-dull-pupils

Expand full comment
Doc C's avatar

Visible light is electromagnetic radiation

Expand full comment
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

Where's the "Magnets"? Earth is not a magnet. Magnets are manufactured in machines, not dug out of mountains. Maybe you've been tought the wrong information. If it's "radiation", then why aren't you all dead yet? Skin cancer comes from many things, including putting nano aluminum on your skin, but surely, no human has ever proven that the "Sun" causes cancer. Otherwise, everyone in Africa and India would be dead already.

Expand full comment
Doc C's avatar

You've also convinced me to abandon my high school physics and stop believing that visible light is electromagnetic radiation. How silly of me

Expand full comment
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

Exactly. You can go shred that Diploma any time now. I'm the one that called all the University Presidents' asking to cancel all student loans; before Bernie Sanders; with a threat to sue them all for lying. I called the Cal Poly SLO Physics Director and asked him "How can you teach anyhing here without Nikola Tesla". He said: "We teach what we want here"! Then you find out, there is no "Guarantee" of quality of eduction in their terms and conditions. So, I started the war against their German Scientology program on that date. You know "Operation Paperclip" of bullshit-artists working in the CIA basement.

I got the highest grade in High School Physics at Westake H.S. highest grade on the Final and built a model Nuclear Power plant for my senior project. That was 1989. At Cal Poly SLO, in 1996, got the highest grade in history in Astrophysics 4.0, 102% on the Final, debunking the Einstein "Event Horizon" question, answering the theoretical question correctly. Then, you investigate Nikola Tesla, and throw all that in the trash. https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/who-is-chief-justice-of-nuremberg-20-apply-as-a-juror-or-expert

It's an electric field, measured in Tesla's. Someone made-up the word "electro-magnetic", unless the electric field is controlled by the poles of the magnetic material, with a magnet. How the magnet is manufactured is what they are fighting over on the China rare earth, magnet wars. They have the machines that make the magnets. Magnetite is a very small portion of the Earth crust, is well dispersed, and is not and cannot be what makes the Earth's electric field. The sole source of primary energy is the Sun. - NT Nor can the Earth's Core be made of "Molten Iron". Any metal that becomes Molten, ceases to have an electric field. See "Curie Temperature" cited in Nikola Tesla's patent for a Pyro-Electro Magneto Generator. Those issues are covered here. https://teslaleaks.com/f/debunking-einstein-part-7-by-chris-edwards-ft-god-vs-evolution

Expand full comment
Proberta's avatar

Wait til you get to the Earth is a hologram.

The Universe is a hologram!

Its ALL a hologram, and its PROGRAMMABLE!

Take the white pill ;)

Expand full comment
Doc C's avatar

I kn rite? How could the core be molten lava if the Earth is flat....

Expand full comment
Doc C's avatar

No magnets????? You're right. They should call it EF. You've convinced me. I'm an M-denier now

Expand full comment
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

Exactly. It's an electric field, measured in Tesla's. Someone made-up the word "electro-magnetic", unless the electric field is controlled by the poles of the magnetic material, with a magnet. How the magnet is manufactured is what they are fighting over on the China rare earth, magnet wars. They have the machines that make the magnets. Magnetite is a very small portion of the Earth crust, is well dispersed, and is not and cannot be what makes the Earth's electric field. The sole source of primary energy is the Sun. - NT Nor can the Earth's Core be made of "Molten Iron". Any metal that becomes Molten, ceases to have an electric field. See "Curie Temperature" cited in Nikola Tesla's patent for a Pyro-Electro Magneto Generator. Those issues are covered here. https://teslaleaks.com/f/debunking-einstein-part-7-by-chris-edwards-ft-god-vs-evolution

Expand full comment
Doc C's avatar

Anyways, you're not even good at trolling... but the length of your spam posts are quite annoying

Expand full comment
Mary Lou Tringali, PhD's avatar

Get a device and check it out for yourself.

Expand full comment
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

They've had the devices for 100 years. Couldn't Alex Jonesenstein just put a few people in a room with a 5G phone and prove that 5G causes "Covid-19"?

Expand full comment
Leynia's avatar

Glad to have these articles. About smart meters, what to DO is my question. I pay $20/month to have one meter read in person rather than being beeped. (I am far from being a high income person.) The other meter is just outside my much-used kitchen. There is no option tfor an in-person reading, not that I could afford it. Any suggestions?

Expand full comment
DaughteroftheKing's avatar

About a year ago, I watched a video with Dr. Tenpenny interviewing Cory Hills. At that time, one of the products his company provides is easily installed on the outside of your home and provides protection for your whole house.

(I have been meaning to check out his website and just haven't had a chance to do so.)

CORY HILLIS

PRESIDENT OF EMF SOLUTIONS INC

CERTIFIED EMF SPECIALIST & TRAINER

emfsol.com

Expand full comment
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

Yes. Cover your entire house with Tin Foil.

Expand full comment
Jayna Dinnyes's avatar

Gee Chief. . .I heard that aluminum poisons the brain. ??? With all the rumors about 5G and smart phones, I am just sticking with my old land line. Welcome BACK to the 20th Century! 😁 I post the truth publicly on MeWe.

Expand full comment
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

You could switch back to dial-up, while Chevron is fracking your water supply with TNT 500 feet from your house. They say the arsenic and fluoride is good for the teeth. It’s gotta be. It eats right through rock.

Expand full comment
Jayna Dinnyes's avatar

Yeah Chief. . .The word TARGET should be written in large letters on ALL of our backs! 🎯 🎯 🎯 🎯 🎯 🎯

Expand full comment
Leynia's avatar

Wow, Daughter of the King, thank you! I will look into this.

Expand full comment
Angel Kinzie's avatar

It was a concern to me, that while I was

Watching this excellent, but long exposure on radiation dangers, Nicholas had two earbuds in use! These are supposed to be the equivalent of microwaving your brain! Please don't use them!

Expand full comment
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH's avatar

I stopped using them.

Expand full comment
Angel Kinzie's avatar

Excellent! I was concerned for you! And

you had 2! I haven't ever used ear buds.

And even though I purchased a wireless

Router, I never used it, after reading

“Radiation Nation “

We live out on the Eastern Plains of

Colorado, @ 7000’. And are surrounded by hundreds of huge transmission

Whirlingigs. And suffer with tinnitus.

The frequencies vary. Sometimes we

Both hear different intensifies. OR pitches.

I am planning to use emergency foil

Blankets in a remodel of our west wall

& ceiling. Hopefully to cut down on the

Radiation.

Thanks Nicholas for all your good work !

Expand full comment
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

What "radiation"? Your microwave is equivalent to microwaving your brain.

Expand full comment
Michael's avatar

It’s hard to avoid. Look how long we were exposed before anything was ever said about it. I don’t know how good it does but I now sleep with my phone on airplane mode, the alarm still works but no constant searching for towers. And I unplug my wifi router every night and day when I remember.

Expand full comment
Formerly_Known_As_Someone's avatar

I have found that airplane mode on the iPhone does not turn off the Wi-Fi. It’s not just me.

Expand full comment
Michael's avatar

Hmm’ it does on mine. And that is just me.

iPhone 12.

Expand full comment
Barbara Charis's avatar

My daughter bought a copper unit, which the company said could protect the whole home from radiation.. I did have someone use a device to check how much EMF exposure there was...and he said that there was very little. People should have no electronic devices in their bedrooms or children's rooms.

Expand full comment
Admin's avatar

This is wonderful. We're trying to fight a planned cell phone tower right next to an elementary school, and this will help.

Expand full comment
Rick McCarthy, LMFT's avatar

Very alarming. Thank you for relaying this information.

Expand full comment
Steve Glaiser's avatar

[using a "Scott Adams" style filter] -- What group(s) funded the study? We're sociological factors (dumping devices in kids laps as babysitters, etc) tracked? At what rates of exposure(s) over what frequency of contact were factored into the study? I'm not knocking the study at all (i've had my share of extra high EMF exposure(s) in the US Air Force so i get it) - just wanna ensure the study isn't targeting something for a specific outcome / influence...

Expand full comment
Ernie's avatar

To your knowledge, are their studies being performed in various school environments around the country? Asking for a friend.

Expand full comment
MNI7's avatar

THANK YOU!!!!🙏🏼

Expand full comment
Ken Gartner's avatar

I would be interested to learn more specifically how the EMR measurements were made. It sounds like a single daytime appointment sample was taken of the EMR in the home. The most sensible place to sample would be inside the infant's crib, as even a few feet away could have a markedly lower exposure, especially if a broadcasting baby monitor was present. Was this measurement taken periodically (once per month?) or just that one time. A single sample is hardly enough to make conclusions about.

Second, I was disappointed that there was not a 'quartile' added for lowest exposure. The exposure of 620 microwatts/m^2 is considered still quite high (per Building Biology exposure thresholds), even if it may be rather typical. I would have liked to have seen the results from infants exposed to <= 10 microwatts/m^2 -- rather low EMF, possibly shielded/mitigated plus good home EMF-hygiene practices.

Expand full comment
Deep Dive's avatar

Thanks, Nic.

This is an important finding as it is prospective and reveals effects below the lowest public exposure limit for EMFs in sensitive public places such as playgrounds (4 V/m). I am a proponent of standardized measures of EMFs using the linear scale of electric field strength in Volts/meter (V/m) due to the expected positive effect on public messaging.

People cannot easily track with all of the different types of radiofrequency power densities (e.g., milliWatts per square-meter) and people also cannot easily comprehend the power law of distance for power density. For these two main reasons, it is expected that always reporting V/m will lead to better public awareness. The top exposure group here had a median exposure of about 3.5 V/m.

That level (below even the municipal exposure limit for sensitive places) already proved toxic.

Expand full comment
What's avatar

Lol. Lmao, even

Expand full comment
Peter Krone's avatar

Musk is clearly not on the science on this one. Driving a car with lots of electronics, blue tooth, etc. might not the best thing for your health and that of your children as well, considering this gives a considerable EMF load on its occupants. On July 8, 2025, Musk posted:

“Your phone is fine. It’s not going to cause DNA damage. You can sleep easy at night.”

This was in response to the question, “If someone says, is my cell phone going to cause brain cancer?”. He aimed to reassure users there’s no cause for alarm.

X (formerly Twitter)

Additionally, Musk made a similar dismissive remark during an appearance on The Joe Rogan Experience. He joked:

“If I had a helmet of cell phones strapped around my head and around my nuts, I would not worry.”

This was meant to mock the concerns over radiofrequency (RF) radiation risks"

Expand full comment
Doc C's avatar

Btw, remember the adage about causation and correlation...

(It is still important to do more research on those kinds of electromagnetic radiation [the Wifi and radiowave kind, beyond visible light part of the spectrum 😉]).

Expand full comment
Susan E Spreitzer's avatar

I’ve known about the negative effects of EMF energy for quite some time now, and am EMF sensitive as well. Thank you for bringing this serious issue to the forefront, because I’ve recently learned that many people are unaware of the dangers of advanced wireless technology.

Expand full comment