First-ever infant cohort study using direct home RF-EMF measurements finds major increases in motor, problem-solving, and social deficits — even at everyday Wi-Fi and cell tower levels.
This is important. I’d like to know about where the study took place, what the sample was, and if they had a control group. We all should be aware that everyone is being affected by radiation. We also know children are much more susceptible to harmful effects.
I have an electromagnetic radiation tester. You can go around your house or office and easily see even your phone and remote controls are all emitting various levels of radiation. ☢️
As you note we are surrounded by electromagnetic fields even from satellites passing by. Measuring those fields is nontrivial. Detecting requires an array of suitable antennas. Doubt “meters” are all that capable but sell well to consumers. Hard to filter out the 60hz stuff from our home wiring. And hard to shield that low frequency stuff. Higher frequencies can’t penetrate much but do scatter a lot. Reflective multi path remains the cell phone dilemma. Hard to get away from that.
There is a EMF quiet place in WV but few wish to live there.
It's not radiation of any sort. Just because something radiates, doesn't mean it's radiation. Besides, 5G is non-ionizing and 6/1,000,000 of 1 watt. How would you intend on proving that 6/1,000,000 of 1 watt can hurt you, when there's more of an electric field coming from your light bulbs and the Sun. Maybe the only safe place is 5 miles deep in one of Alex Jonesenstein's coal mines, with a bottle of his D3 "Rat Poison" because his viewers melt in the Sun. I think the massive EMF blasting off of the spark plugs in your gas car needs to be investigated.
Thankfully the spark plug wires are encased in a metal box. But it’s mighty noisy inside that box.
Not sure we can “prove” anything given our current tool sets. But the cited study ought to give us pause. Infants might be a decent subject for analyses given they aren’t biased yet.
Understand about potential public fears regarding “radiation” but electric and magnetic fields surround us with benefits/costs not fully understood. But we keep adding more to make our lives better, we think.
Where's the "Magnets"? Earth is not a magnet. Magnets are manufactured in machines, not dug out of mountains. Maybe you've been tought the wrong information. If it's "radiation", then why aren't you all dead yet? Skin cancer comes from many things, including putting nano aluminum on your skin, but surely, no human has ever proven that the "Sun" causes cancer. Otherwise, everyone in Africa and India would be dead already.
Glad to have these articles. About smart meters, what to DO is my question. I pay $20/month to have one meter read in person rather than being beeped. (I am far from being a high income person.) The other meter is just outside my much-used kitchen. There is no option tfor an in-person reading, not that I could afford it. Any suggestions?
About a year ago, I watched a video with Dr. Tenpenny interviewing Cory Hills. At that time, one of the products his company provides is easily installed on the outside of your home and provides protection for your whole house.
(I have been meaning to check out his website and just haven't had a chance to do so.)
Gee Chief. . .I heard that aluminum poisons the brain. ??? With all the rumors about 5G and smart phones, I am just sticking with my old land line. Welcome BACK to the 20th Century! 😁 I post the truth publicly on MeWe.
You could switch back to dial-up, while Chevron is fracking your water supply with TNT 500 feet from your house. They say the arsenic and fluoride is good for the teeth. It’s gotta be. It eats right through rock.
Watching this excellent, but long exposure on radiation dangers, Nicholas had two earbuds in use! These are supposed to be the equivalent of microwaving your brain! Please don't use them!
It’s hard to avoid. Look how long we were exposed before anything was ever said about it. I don’t know how good it does but I now sleep with my phone on airplane mode, the alarm still works but no constant searching for towers. And I unplug my wifi router every night and day when I remember.
My daughter bought a copper unit, which the company said could protect the whole home from radiation.. I did have someone use a device to check how much EMF exposure there was...and he said that there was very little. People should have no electronic devices in their bedrooms or children's rooms.
[using a "Scott Adams" style filter] -- What group(s) funded the study? We're sociological factors (dumping devices in kids laps as babysitters, etc) tracked? At what rates of exposure(s) over what frequency of contact were factored into the study? I'm not knocking the study at all (i've had my share of extra high EMF exposure(s) in the US Air Force so i get it) - just wanna ensure the study isn't targeting something for a specific outcome / influence...
“When wireless technology is perfectly applied the whole earth will be converted into a huge brain.”
“We shall be able to communicate with one another instantly, irrespective of distance. Not only this, but through television and telephony we shall see and hear one another as perfectly as though we were face to face, despite intervening distances of thousands of miles; and the instruments through which we shall be able to do this will be amazingly simple compared with our present telephone.”
“A man will be able to carry one in his vest pocket.”
I’d say he gets at least a silver or bronze medal.
I would be interested to learn more specifically how the EMR measurements were made. It sounds like a single daytime appointment sample was taken of the EMR in the home. The most sensible place to sample would be inside the infant's crib, as even a few feet away could have a markedly lower exposure, especially if a broadcasting baby monitor was present. Was this measurement taken periodically (once per month?) or just that one time. A single sample is hardly enough to make conclusions about.
Second, I was disappointed that there was not a 'quartile' added for lowest exposure. The exposure of 620 microwatts/m^2 is considered still quite high (per Building Biology exposure thresholds), even if it may be rather typical. I would have liked to have seen the results from infants exposed to <= 10 microwatts/m^2 -- rather low EMF, possibly shielded/mitigated plus good home EMF-hygiene practices.
This is an important finding as it is prospective and reveals effects below the lowest public exposure limit for EMFs in sensitive public places such as playgrounds (4 V/m). I am a proponent of standardized measures of EMFs using the linear scale of electric field strength in Volts/meter (V/m) due to the expected positive effect on public messaging.
People cannot easily track with all of the different types of radiofrequency power densities (e.g., milliWatts per square-meter) and people also cannot easily comprehend the power law of distance for power density. For these two main reasons, it is expected that always reporting V/m will lead to better public awareness. The top exposure group here had a median exposure of about 3.5 V/m.
That level (below even the municipal exposure limit for sensitive places) already proved toxic.
Musk is clearly not on the science on this one. Driving a car with lots of electronics, blue tooth, etc. might not the best thing for your health and that of your children as well, considering this gives a considerable EMF load on its occupants. On July 8, 2025, Musk posted:
“Your phone is fine. It’s not going to cause DNA damage. You can sleep easy at night.”
This was in response to the question, “If someone says, is my cell phone going to cause brain cancer?”. He aimed to reassure users there’s no cause for alarm.
X (formerly Twitter)
Additionally, Musk made a similar dismissive remark during an appearance on The Joe Rogan Experience. He joked:
“If I had a helmet of cell phones strapped around my head and around my nuts, I would not worry.”
This was meant to mock the concerns over radiofrequency (RF) radiation risks"
This is important. I’d like to know about where the study took place, what the sample was, and if they had a control group. We all should be aware that everyone is being affected by radiation. We also know children are much more susceptible to harmful effects.
I have an electromagnetic radiation tester. You can go around your house or office and easily see even your phone and remote controls are all emitting various levels of radiation. ☢️
As you note we are surrounded by electromagnetic fields even from satellites passing by. Measuring those fields is nontrivial. Detecting requires an array of suitable antennas. Doubt “meters” are all that capable but sell well to consumers. Hard to filter out the 60hz stuff from our home wiring. And hard to shield that low frequency stuff. Higher frequencies can’t penetrate much but do scatter a lot. Reflective multi path remains the cell phone dilemma. Hard to get away from that.
There is a EMF quiet place in WV but few wish to live there.
Wifi and Cell phones are not 'radiation".
Not radiation? Perhaps not radioactive but electromagnetic radiation as noted. Seems a possible issue that bears further study.
Great sense of humor!
It's not radiation of any sort. Just because something radiates, doesn't mean it's radiation. Besides, 5G is non-ionizing and 6/1,000,000 of 1 watt. How would you intend on proving that 6/1,000,000 of 1 watt can hurt you, when there's more of an electric field coming from your light bulbs and the Sun. Maybe the only safe place is 5 miles deep in one of Alex Jonesenstein's coal mines, with a bottle of his D3 "Rat Poison" because his viewers melt in the Sun. I think the massive EMF blasting off of the spark plugs in your gas car needs to be investigated.
Btw, you speak of "Alex Josenstein" and "tin foil hats" , and yet: do you believe in viruses?
Thankfully the spark plug wires are encased in a metal box. But it’s mighty noisy inside that box.
Not sure we can “prove” anything given our current tool sets. But the cited study ought to give us pause. Infants might be a decent subject for analyses given they aren’t biased yet.
Understand about potential public fears regarding “radiation” but electric and magnetic fields surround us with benefits/costs not fully understood. But we keep adding more to make our lives better, we think.
Visible light is electromagnetic radiation
Where's the "Magnets"? Earth is not a magnet. Magnets are manufactured in machines, not dug out of mountains. Maybe you've been tought the wrong information. If it's "radiation", then why aren't you all dead yet? Skin cancer comes from many things, including putting nano aluminum on your skin, but surely, no human has ever proven that the "Sun" causes cancer. Otherwise, everyone in Africa and India would be dead already.
You've also convinced me to abandon my high school physics and stop believing that visible light is electromagnetic radiation. How silly of me
No magnets????? You're right. They should call it EF. You've convinced me. I'm an M-denier now
Get a device and check it out for yourself.
They've had the devices for 100 years. Couldn't Alex Jonesenstein just put a few people in a room with a 5G phone and prove that 5G causes "Covid-19"?
Glad to have these articles. About smart meters, what to DO is my question. I pay $20/month to have one meter read in person rather than being beeped. (I am far from being a high income person.) The other meter is just outside my much-used kitchen. There is no option tfor an in-person reading, not that I could afford it. Any suggestions?
About a year ago, I watched a video with Dr. Tenpenny interviewing Cory Hills. At that time, one of the products his company provides is easily installed on the outside of your home and provides protection for your whole house.
(I have been meaning to check out his website and just haven't had a chance to do so.)
CORY HILLIS
PRESIDENT OF EMF SOLUTIONS INC
CERTIFIED EMF SPECIALIST & TRAINER
emfsol.com
Yes. Cover your entire house with Tin Foil.
Gee Chief. . .I heard that aluminum poisons the brain. ??? With all the rumors about 5G and smart phones, I am just sticking with my old land line. Welcome BACK to the 20th Century! 😁 I post the truth publicly on MeWe.
You could switch back to dial-up, while Chevron is fracking your water supply with TNT 500 feet from your house. They say the arsenic and fluoride is good for the teeth. It’s gotta be. It eats right through rock.
Wow, Daughter of the King, thank you! I will look into this.
It was a concern to me, that while I was
Watching this excellent, but long exposure on radiation dangers, Nicholas had two earbuds in use! These are supposed to be the equivalent of microwaving your brain! Please don't use them!
I stopped using them.
Excellent! I was concerned for you! And
you had 2! I haven't ever used ear buds.
And even though I purchased a wireless
Router, I never used it, after reading
“Radiation Nation “
We live out on the Eastern Plains of
Colorado, @ 7000’. And are surrounded by hundreds of huge transmission
Whirlingigs. And suffer with tinnitus.
The frequencies vary. Sometimes we
Both hear different intensifies. OR pitches.
I am planning to use emergency foil
Blankets in a remodel of our west wall
& ceiling. Hopefully to cut down on the
Radiation.
Thanks Nicholas for all your good work !
What "radiation"? Your microwave is equivalent to microwaving your brain.
This is wonderful. We're trying to fight a planned cell phone tower right next to an elementary school, and this will help.
It’s hard to avoid. Look how long we were exposed before anything was ever said about it. I don’t know how good it does but I now sleep with my phone on airplane mode, the alarm still works but no constant searching for towers. And I unplug my wifi router every night and day when I remember.
I have found that airplane mode on the iPhone does not turn off the Wi-Fi. It’s not just me.
Hmm’ it does on mine. And that is just me.
iPhone 12.
My daughter bought a copper unit, which the company said could protect the whole home from radiation.. I did have someone use a device to check how much EMF exposure there was...and he said that there was very little. People should have no electronic devices in their bedrooms or children's rooms.
Very alarming. Thank you for relaying this information.
[using a "Scott Adams" style filter] -- What group(s) funded the study? We're sociological factors (dumping devices in kids laps as babysitters, etc) tracked? At what rates of exposure(s) over what frequency of contact were factored into the study? I'm not knocking the study at all (i've had my share of extra high EMF exposure(s) in the US Air Force so i get it) - just wanna ensure the study isn't targeting something for a specific outcome / influence...
To your knowledge, are their studies being performed in various school environments around the country? Asking for a friend.
look into the data centers…https://outlawedbyjp.substack.com/p/emf-effects-of-data-centers
In 1926, Nikola Tesla, said this:
“When wireless technology is perfectly applied the whole earth will be converted into a huge brain.”
“We shall be able to communicate with one another instantly, irrespective of distance. Not only this, but through television and telephony we shall see and hear one another as perfectly as though we were face to face, despite intervening distances of thousands of miles; and the instruments through which we shall be able to do this will be amazingly simple compared with our present telephone.”
“A man will be able to carry one in his vest pocket.”
I’d say he gets at least a silver or bronze medal.
THANK YOU!!!!🙏🏼
I would be interested to learn more specifically how the EMR measurements were made. It sounds like a single daytime appointment sample was taken of the EMR in the home. The most sensible place to sample would be inside the infant's crib, as even a few feet away could have a markedly lower exposure, especially if a broadcasting baby monitor was present. Was this measurement taken periodically (once per month?) or just that one time. A single sample is hardly enough to make conclusions about.
Second, I was disappointed that there was not a 'quartile' added for lowest exposure. The exposure of 620 microwatts/m^2 is considered still quite high (per Building Biology exposure thresholds), even if it may be rather typical. I would have liked to have seen the results from infants exposed to <= 10 microwatts/m^2 -- rather low EMF, possibly shielded/mitigated plus good home EMF-hygiene practices.
Thanks, Nic.
This is an important finding as it is prospective and reveals effects below the lowest public exposure limit for EMFs in sensitive public places such as playgrounds (4 V/m). I am a proponent of standardized measures of EMFs using the linear scale of electric field strength in Volts/meter (V/m) due to the expected positive effect on public messaging.
People cannot easily track with all of the different types of radiofrequency power densities (e.g., milliWatts per square-meter) and people also cannot easily comprehend the power law of distance for power density. For these two main reasons, it is expected that always reporting V/m will lead to better public awareness. The top exposure group here had a median exposure of about 3.5 V/m.
That level (below even the municipal exposure limit for sensitive places) already proved toxic.
Lol. Lmao, even
Musk is clearly not on the science on this one. Driving a car with lots of electronics, blue tooth, etc. might not the best thing for your health and that of your children as well, considering this gives a considerable EMF load on its occupants. On July 8, 2025, Musk posted:
“Your phone is fine. It’s not going to cause DNA damage. You can sleep easy at night.”
This was in response to the question, “If someone says, is my cell phone going to cause brain cancer?”. He aimed to reassure users there’s no cause for alarm.
X (formerly Twitter)
Additionally, Musk made a similar dismissive remark during an appearance on The Joe Rogan Experience. He joked:
“If I had a helmet of cell phones strapped around my head and around my nuts, I would not worry.”
This was meant to mock the concerns over radiofrequency (RF) radiation risks"