As a former US Army Ranger, I have questioned in other comments how a 30.06 round traveling at over 2,000 fps did not pass through Charlie's neck as the ME has stated. The mass of that round traveling at more than the twice the speed of sound should have almost decapitated poor Charlie. Had it passed through his neck it could have killed someone else. I used to teach the NRA Safe Hunter course, and one of the things we taught was "Where will that bullet go if you miss?" Make sure of your backstop.
I am also a Christian and after prayerfully considering this event, I believe we witnessed a miracle and the hand of God keeping that bullet from killing others.
I also believe God spared President Trump's life at Butler, PA. Crooks fired eight 5.56 rounds from his AR-15 and killed one man and injured two others before a Secret Service sniper killed him.
Those who aren't believers may be asking that if we witnessed miracles, why was President Trump's life spared and Charlie killed? Doesn't seem fair, does it? Certainly not by earthly standards. But Christians know that God has His purposes, and can see how both those events have worked to His glory - just look at the religious revival taking place right now, not just in America but around the world.
Charlie's widow Erika was leaning on Jesus and drawing strength from Him as she forgave Robinson. Non-believers don't understand how she could have forgiven the killer of her husband but it's simple. If you want God to forgive you for your sins, then you must forgive others for theirs. On the cross, Jesus asked His heavenly father to forgive those who were killing Him. If you call yourself a Christian, then that's how you follow Christ. Not just in words, but in actions
God is good and all good things come from Him. Much good has already come from Charlie's being martyred. When have you ever heard high level US government officials mentioning Jesus and His Gospel publically. God is returning the United States to "One nation under God". The question is not do you believe in God. The question many should be asking is "Can I afford NOT to believe in God."
I am going to continue to make this unpopular statement: It is unAmerican to convict Tyler Robinson in the court of public opinion. Even if Mrs Kirk wanted to display Christlike forgiveness it was inappropriate prior to an actual conviction. It strikes me as just doubling and tripling down on the one “sanctioned” theory of the crime — a lone gunman with private sexual motives — actually by both “right and left”. I remain highly skeptical, as a conservative Christian, I’ll add.
I agree. Because a very sympathetic figure, ( and very deservedly so) the grief stricken widow has called out Tyler Robinson as the murderer to millions of likewise grieving citizens, this really smacks of Psyops. Bigtime. I think it is fair to say at this point, a fair trail for the young man is now virtually impossible.
And while I am so very sad and distraught over this brutal killing, it smacks of the Kennedy assassination.
And the Turning Points memorial? While a few of the speakers were excellent ( Tulsi and RFKJr) and it was beyond wonderful to see the turnout, the service I thought on the whole was tasteless, including vapid remarks by DJT and his son. The fireworks going off? That’s for political rallies not memorial services. It all rubbed me as so wrong. Who vetted Mrs. Kirks remarks ?
My sentiments EXACTLY. And I mean EXACTLY. I only watched parts of it. But I will say, Tucker got in his sly dissent whether people understood it that way or not
Well, I said “I agree” with the initial criticism. I’ve only added my personal take since the shooter’s name wasn’t mentioned. You take it to mean Tyler, I take it to mean whoever the assassin was.
I think everyone thinks that the meaning was Tyler, so you can consider me an “outlier".
So, I’ve gone back and looked at the clip, she says “This young man”. That pretty much nails it — with or without a name and with or without my personal take, which looks more like what I wish she would have said and that’s wrong. The original poster is right, she should not have done it.
I will be interested in further comments from her regarding the shooter.
That is the ultimate spy novel twist. Now I want to be very careful not to slander this woman, however she is going to speak on Charlie’s podcast and I am rather expecting her to try to put to rest the “I didn’t kill Charlie” BBN/bribery issue. Depending on what she says, it could be a betrayal of Kirk’s publicly expressed concerns.
Ths crack-bang-interval analysis says the gun was 30 yards away, not 150. That's really close to the stage. Where?
More evidence that Tyler Robinson was not the shooter, but just the patsy.
Quote: Smartski@2Smartski·Sep 17
Acoustic analysis confirms shooter was near ground-level, ~70-90ft away — not a rooftop. Crack–bang intervals across all recordings: 0.08–0.14s = 70–90 ft distance (speed of sound @ 82°F = 1141 ft/s) Closest audio clip shows total crack/bang overlap, impact clear = <100 ft https://x.com/EmeraldRobinson/status/1969054789376901189
"I am also a Christian and after prayerfully considering this event, I believe we witnessed a miracle and the hand of God keeping that bullet from killing others."
That is absurd. But 'God' hated Kirk and had him die???
Yes, the same way the incarnate God-man died a gruesome death at the hands of the Romans and so did his early followers. So today that tiny Jewish sect is a worldwide faith. Funny how that works
Truly incredible how God can turn evil into good. Somebody at the funeral quoted a verse (12,34 of somebook in the New Testmont) about a single wheat seed falling (and dying) yet multiples of life came from that one death.
Bringing good from evil, nobody but God can do it as well.
Everyone's physical body dies. An all-powerful God would not regard the death of a physical body as significant in the way an an atheist and materialist does. Therefore, your equating of physical death to an act of hate is predictable. This is the simple reality of believers and non-believers, the grateful and the ingrates.
There is also the possibility it was an old round, or a dud (ish) round. While manufacturing is in general very precise things can and will go wrong. 🤷♀️
I suspect it was a non-jacketed hollowpoint fragmentation round, custom loaded, so as to transmit all of the energy into the target and destroy the projectile in that energy transfer.
Custom loading is comon amongst hunters and enthusiasts.
It glanced of the titanium sapi plate he wore near the upper edge, tumbled, struck his neck at the carotid, hooked in behind that muscle group and impacted his cervical vertebrae at C3-4, stopping there. That’s what high velocity projectiles do.
Army Ranger apparently hasn’t seen a .30 cal deflected by twigs, as they so often do.
YES, YES, this is a video that I described later in these Comments that shows tan-clothes man purportedly using the flat gun against Charlie. There is also a larger, more focused and up-close, almost identical video somewhere out there (sorry, I didn't save it), that I describe later in these Comments. Please also see my Comment further down.
Jennifer, was it on rense.com? That's the one I saw. It's similiar to this one but only about 9 seconds long. I'm 77 yrs old and have seen these psyops so many times before in my life. I never believe what the government puts out there. This time is no different. It's a very sad situation. Blessings!!
Please remember that as Christians we believe that 1) God has given us free will to choose good or evil ( otherwise there is no such thing as love because without free will there is no love) and 2) Satan is the ruler of this world and will be until the second coming. But the Bible teaches our God works all things to the good for those who love the Lord. It doesn’t teach exactly how, why or when . Unfortunately, it looks to me that in this relentless war by Satan on God’s creation, that sadly at this point in time, Turning Points has been captured.
As another commenter stated in another Substack, there were two people on a cross on either side of Jesus. One asked for forgiveness and was taken up to Paradise. The other was not. Jesus forgave the adulterer and told her to go, and sin no more. I, as a Christian, believe that forgiveness requires confession and repentance. If the perpetrator is not interested in your forgiveness, don’t allow hate for that person to consume you. God will, ultimately judge that person. It reminds me of the parable about the man who was forgiven of a debt, but when someone else was indebted to him, he did not forgive. We are to forgive those who trespass against us as we would want our trespasses to be forgiven. This is not blind forgiveness.
I too am a Christian, but an old lady. I believe Jesus is my Savior. I have seen miracles in my life. And I firmly know what the gospel says is true: absent from the body means present with the Lord. But unfortunately I have been through many “conspiracy” theories in my long life that turned out to be true. They have all been orchestrated by the CIA or CIA/Mossad. The most recent Covid debacle killed and maimed millions of innocent civilians worldwide wide and maimed our young troops with illegally forced medical experiments. I do not trust in my government and that includes the present ruling oligarchs. Turning Points USA looks like they are now controlled as is most of our government. I trust only in Jesus who redeemed me with his sacrifice on the cross.
Sounds like a message designed for Charlie's main constituency. Smells of psyop and coverup. Interesting that more than one individual have been propogating the same, almost identical message. It appears that the perps believe Charlie's followers to be gullible and naive, and unfortunately, if they believe this explanation of a miracle, they would be right.
The Counter Revolution has now created a Counter Revival to join it. This is going to be big. Like Steven the first martyr praying for his murderers, Charlie has planted a seed that will be YUUGE. This is a mass harvesting event. Keep looking up; we're close. And remember, we're the King's Kids.
Considering that so many people are finding this story hard to believe (including myself), I think it would be a good idea to release the autopsy photos showing that there was no exit wound.
Came first from the camera mounted behind Kirk when examined by TP/USA, then shared with Candace Owens. Alex Jones has now talked to the same TP/USA source. That source talked to the ER surgeon and forwarded the surgeon's analysis to Jones and probably Owens. Surgeon claims the bullet deflected downward off Kirk's spine. Difficult to believe if the round was actually a 30-06 (which can sometimes pierce an engine block, even if the bullet isn't armor piercing). But still, an ER surgeon's report isn't an autopsy.
As I recall, in the initial press conference on the day of the assassination, the Parkland doctors called JFK's throat wound an entry wound. They were later pressed by the Bethesda autopsy team not to repeat that assessment.
A custom lead, non-jacketed hollowpoint fragmentation round could have been loaded and used, and it was from very close, 30 yards, somewhere in the crowd,or one of those big bushes to Charlie's left.
More evidence that Tyler Robinson was not the shooter, but just the patsy.
Quote: Smartski@2Smartski·Sep 17
Acoustic analysis confirms shooter was near ground-level, ~70-90ft away — not a rooftop. Crack–bang intervals across all recordings: 0.08–0.14s = 70–90 ft distance (speed of sound @ 82°F = 1141 ft/s) Closest audio clip shows total crack/bang overlap, impact clear = <100 ft https://x.com/EmeraldRobinson/status/1969054789376901189
Saw two gun experts dispute the official story. They said that purported gun would have done far more damage. They say he wore no body armor. They think he was shot from the right behind his ear and the other wound IS the exit wound.
You are so right about the loss of trust. The major side effect of such a loss is the spawning of all manner of conspiracy theories in very prolific quantities. That is what we are seeing in nearly all newsworthy events. What does one do when experience says that the official narrative is at least partially if not totally false, or at best it is incomplete? The powers that be that have complained about misinformation have brought it on themselves.
1. Why wasn't there a ambulance on site for that large contentious event?
2. Why didn't they call 911? Instead they carried him to a SUV and drove him...glad there wasn't traffic!
3. Not a single drop of blood on the ground in the path around the SUV... nor on his shoes.
4. Tyler didn't have a rifle with him jumping off the roof... Nor did he toss it to the ground before climbing down. And that text exchange was FAKE
5. The supposed bullet I believe came from the left side of stage (if you're facing Charlie...slightly elevated...you can see a flash of light when he's shot...
6. THIS WHOLE EVENT JUST BROUGHT MILLIONS OF VOTERS TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!
Candace Owens saw the video footage from the camera behind Charlie and said there was "no gore" ie no blood. I suppose it is possible that she may simply not have seen a small entry wound depending on where it hit. My current theory matches yours, and explains why hand signals might be required. Those could have coordinated the shooters so that the nearby small caliber weapon sound was masked by the exactly timed decoy rifle shot. I am quite sure that if the claimed weapon and cartridge wasthe actual weapon used to murder Charlie, the damage to his head and neck would have been much more catastrophic. They say the bullet was found within his body. Maybe so. But we cannot believe anything they are saying.
There is a theory that the bullet struck the edge of the body armor, deforming and deflecting upward. That might explain the relatively large entry wound and the lack of an exit wound. I’m not saying it’s correct, but it sounds plausible.
If you find the video clip of Charlie tossing MAGA hats to the crowd before he talked, you can see his body moving, muscle and fat, under his white cotton t-shirt. No body armor apparent.
His wife said in the New York Times interview that he wasn’t wearing body armor and pictures of the back of his t-shirt right before. do not evidence he was wearing any. My husband surmises the round may have been old, the powder old or underweight (it happens) or was a “dud” (for a 30-06) power wise. Stranger things have happened.
Close up assassin with the bullet hitting the left clavicle and being deflected upwards to penetrate the jugular. X-ray of Charles torso would confirm. Which makes sense if it was from a trajectory lower than his shoulder.
The murder site was never taped off or even investigated. In fact, it was immediately contaminated. Both high definition cameras were removed in under five minutes. The tent and stage were being broken down 10 minutes after the shot. The entire crime scene was gone within two hours, and the site was fully erased—demolished, rebuilt, and reopened to foot traffic—in less than a week. Even a rookie cop knows this is not how you handle a crime scene, especially when it is one of the highest profile assassinations in decades and they STILL HAVEN'T FOUND THE BULLET!!
Quite often, I'm amazed at John's body of knowledge. Though, he seems to know way too much for any individual and that comes across a foolish arrogance... A bit of a follow-up to Lowell's comment...
To wit, John's statement:
A 150-grain, .30-06 bullet's energy at 150 yards from the muzzle varies by ammunition, but a common hunting cartridge has an estimated value of approximately 1,800-2,000 foot-pounds (with the bullet traveling at about 2500 feet per second). In other words, the .30 caliber (.30 inch diameter) metal projectile struck his neck with sufficient kinetic energy to move a 2,000 pound mass a linear distance of one foot.
A response from one of the LLMs:
Evaluation of the .30-06 Bullet Energy Statement
The statement demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of physics concepts, specifically confusing kinetic energy with work capacity.
The ballistics data is reasonably accurate.
The Fundamental Physics Error
The critical flaw lies in the statement: "sufficient kinetic energy to move a 2,000 pound mass a linear distance of one foot."
Kinetic Energy vs. Work - Different Concepts, Same Units
Kinetic Energy (what the bullet possesses):
• Definition: Energy of motion = ½mv²
• Units: foot-pounds (ft-lbs)
• Nature: Energy stored in a moving object
Work (what's needed to move something):
• Definition: Force applied through distance = F × d
• Units: foot-pounds (ft-lbs) - same unit, completely different concept!
• To lift 2,000 lbs by 1 foot requires 2,000 ft-lbs of work
Why the Equivalence is Wrong
Unit Confusion: Both kinetic energy and mechanical work use foot-pounds, but they represent entirely different physical quantities. The foot-pound as an energy unit measures "the energy transferred upon applying a force of one pound-force through a linear displacement of one foot", not the capacity to lift specific weights.
Energy Transfer Efficiency: Bullet impacts are incredibly inefficient at converting kinetic energy to useful mechanical work. Most energy is lost to:
• Deformation of bullet and target
• Heat generation
• Sound production
• Tissue damage
Physical Reality Check: Even with perfect efficiency (impossible in reality), the bullet's ~2,000 ft-lbs could theoretically lift 2,000 pounds exactly 1 foot. With realistic efficiency (~10%), it could lift 2,000 pounds only about 1.2 inches.
The Correct Physics Understanding
The statement conflates energy with work capacity. While both use the same units, kinetic energy doesn't directly translate to lifting ability. The work-energy theorem states that work equals the change in kinetic energy, but this doesn't mean kinetic energy can be directly converted to mechanical work like lifting.
A bullet's kinetic energy represents its capacity to do damage through rapid deceleration and energy transfer upon impact, not its ability to perform mechanical work like lifting objects against gravity.
Conclusion: While the ballistics numbers are accurate, the physical interpretation demonstrates a poor understanding of fundamental physics concepts - specifically the difference between kinetic energy and mechanical work capacity.
John, you don't need to comment on everything in the world. Too many of your posts come across as "click bait" or "influencer-itis" or hubris...
The following pointers indicate - to me at least - that we the public have been sold a very big lie.
1. The red liquid from his neck came gushing in one constant 2-second stream, belying the fact that a pumping heart would have sent real blood in a series of bursts
2. He held onto the microphone in his left hand for nearly 2 seconds. Any AI search for the likelihood of this will come up negative. He should have dropped any object immediately.
3. The rush to contaminate the crime scene by disposing of everything there and quickly paving over the area where the police could have found bullet fragments / real or fake blood is criminally outrageous
4. The subsequent drivel about Charlie Kirk possessing bones that stop bullets is the icing on the toxic cake
Given the above, it's now sensible to assume that the jury can only be out on whether CK is alive or dead.
"The trouble our Republic is facing now is that so many of us no longer trust our federal and state authorities to tell us the truth. "
how one can still trust anyone in medical field AFTER having millions of dying with WHITE CLOTS generated after the covid genetically modifying injections and NO ONE HEARS ABOUT IT, except for VERY FEW truthful embalmers???
Take another field: GEOENGINEERING with the most recent hearing about it:
John, you beg the question: are all those mercilessly slaughtered by the covid shot , shot to death in an equally heinous, or more heinous, fashion than Charl ie? Both are utter and complete innocents, however much Charlie knew his risks whereas the poor dupes who took the shot simply believed, or were compelled to such a degree to overcome a rational doubt.
Is anyone able to say what those hand signals meant? Are they universal? I don't notice any hand signals in any other video at these university events of Charlies?
John Leake— I always appreciate your insight as a professional crime writer.
About SADS. It so happens that this weekend found me transcribing a couple of videos on SADS, one from 2021 and another from 2022. I personally know someone, previously healthy, who one sunny day planked on the sidewalk, dead. Fully boosted, yes.
About the heart. What has been well-documented is the damage the covid injections can do to the heart. But don't forget those white clots (fibrinaloid castings)— and who knows what else. Without autopsies, and reliable reports from those autopsies, we're all a bit lost in the woods of speculation. As you say, "The trouble our Republic is facing now is that so many of us no longer trust our federal and state authorities to tell us the truth."
As a former US Army Ranger, I have questioned in other comments how a 30.06 round traveling at over 2,000 fps did not pass through Charlie's neck as the ME has stated. The mass of that round traveling at more than the twice the speed of sound should have almost decapitated poor Charlie. Had it passed through his neck it could have killed someone else. I used to teach the NRA Safe Hunter course, and one of the things we taught was "Where will that bullet go if you miss?" Make sure of your backstop.
I am also a Christian and after prayerfully considering this event, I believe we witnessed a miracle and the hand of God keeping that bullet from killing others.
I also believe God spared President Trump's life at Butler, PA. Crooks fired eight 5.56 rounds from his AR-15 and killed one man and injured two others before a Secret Service sniper killed him.
Those who aren't believers may be asking that if we witnessed miracles, why was President Trump's life spared and Charlie killed? Doesn't seem fair, does it? Certainly not by earthly standards. But Christians know that God has His purposes, and can see how both those events have worked to His glory - just look at the religious revival taking place right now, not just in America but around the world.
Charlie's widow Erika was leaning on Jesus and drawing strength from Him as she forgave Robinson. Non-believers don't understand how she could have forgiven the killer of her husband but it's simple. If you want God to forgive you for your sins, then you must forgive others for theirs. On the cross, Jesus asked His heavenly father to forgive those who were killing Him. If you call yourself a Christian, then that's how you follow Christ. Not just in words, but in actions
God is good and all good things come from Him. Much good has already come from Charlie's being martyred. When have you ever heard high level US government officials mentioning Jesus and His Gospel publically. God is returning the United States to "One nation under God". The question is not do you believe in God. The question many should be asking is "Can I afford NOT to believe in God."
I am going to continue to make this unpopular statement: It is unAmerican to convict Tyler Robinson in the court of public opinion. Even if Mrs Kirk wanted to display Christlike forgiveness it was inappropriate prior to an actual conviction. It strikes me as just doubling and tripling down on the one “sanctioned” theory of the crime — a lone gunman with private sexual motives — actually by both “right and left”. I remain highly skeptical, as a conservative Christian, I’ll add.
She forgave the patsy. That's easier, particularly if you have been told.
https://youtu.be/fhRZ8ZFN6Ds?si=eUogqnyR7vo6Svk8
I agree. Because a very sympathetic figure, ( and very deservedly so) the grief stricken widow has called out Tyler Robinson as the murderer to millions of likewise grieving citizens, this really smacks of Psyops. Bigtime. I think it is fair to say at this point, a fair trail for the young man is now virtually impossible.
And while I am so very sad and distraught over this brutal killing, it smacks of the Kennedy assassination.
And the Turning Points memorial? While a few of the speakers were excellent ( Tulsi and RFKJr) and it was beyond wonderful to see the turnout, the service I thought on the whole was tasteless, including vapid remarks by DJT and his son. The fireworks going off? That’s for political rallies not memorial services. It all rubbed me as so wrong. Who vetted Mrs. Kirks remarks ?
My sentiments EXACTLY. And I mean EXACTLY. I only watched parts of it. But I will say, Tucker got in his sly dissent whether people understood it that way or not
I agree, but did she name the shooter? I guess it was implied but I (Personally) took it as forgiveness for whoever shot her husband.
She said “this” man. Not whoever or the person who. Or whoever did this. I understood that to mean Tyler Robinson.
Well, I said “I agree” with the initial criticism. I’ve only added my personal take since the shooter’s name wasn’t mentioned. You take it to mean Tyler, I take it to mean whoever the assassin was.
I think everyone thinks that the meaning was Tyler, so you can consider me an “outlier".
So, I’ve gone back and looked at the clip, she says “This young man”. That pretty much nails it — with or without a name and with or without my personal take, which looks more like what I wish she would have said and that’s wrong. The original poster is right, she should not have done it.
I will be interested in further comments from her regarding the shooter.
https://youtu.be/fhRZ8ZFN6Ds?si=eUogqnyR7vo6Svk8
I read the range was 140 yards and there was a scope.
"I am going to continue to make this unpopular statement: It is unAmerican to convict Tyler Robinson in the court of public opinion."
Well done for saying this. I endorse your opinion,
This event has all the hallmarks of a deep state fake.
100%. Plus, she would NEVER forgive a well orchestrated assassination by Israel, unless, she is herself, an agent.
That is the ultimate spy novel twist. Now I want to be very careful not to slander this woman, however she is going to speak on Charlie’s podcast and I am rather expecting her to try to put to rest the “I didn’t kill Charlie” BBN/bribery issue. Depending on what she says, it could be a betrayal of Kirk’s publicly expressed concerns.
Here is a 15 kg autommatic sentry device, which would be easier to conceal and quickly remove. https://www.twz.com/35031/this-portable-remote-weapon-turret-is-like-contra-and-call-of-duty-video-games-come-to-life#:
Ths crack-bang-interval analysis says the gun was 30 yards away, not 150. That's really close to the stage. Where?
More evidence that Tyler Robinson was not the shooter, but just the patsy.
Quote: Smartski@2Smartski·Sep 17
Acoustic analysis confirms shooter was near ground-level, ~70-90ft away — not a rooftop. Crack–bang intervals across all recordings: 0.08–0.14s = 70–90 ft distance (speed of sound @ 82°F = 1141 ft/s) Closest audio clip shows total crack/bang overlap, impact clear = <100 ft https://x.com/EmeraldRobinson/status/1969054789376901189
https://youtu.be/fhRZ8ZFN6Ds?si=eUogqnyR7vo6Svk8
"I am also a Christian and after prayerfully considering this event, I believe we witnessed a miracle and the hand of God keeping that bullet from killing others."
That is absurd. But 'God' hated Kirk and had him die???
Yes, the same way the incarnate God-man died a gruesome death at the hands of the Romans and so did his early followers. So today that tiny Jewish sect is a worldwide faith. Funny how that works
https://youtu.be/fhRZ8ZFN6Ds?si=eUogqnyR7vo6Svk8
Truly incredible how God can turn evil into good. Somebody at the funeral quoted a verse (12,34 of somebook in the New Testmont) about a single wheat seed falling (and dying) yet multiples of life came from that one death.
Bringing good from evil, nobody but God can do it as well.
https://youtu.be/fhRZ8ZFN6Ds?si=eUogqnyR7vo6Svk8
Everyone's physical body dies. An all-powerful God would not regard the death of a physical body as significant in the way an an atheist and materialist does. Therefore, your equating of physical death to an act of hate is predictable. This is the simple reality of believers and non-believers, the grateful and the ingrates.
There is also the possibility it was an old round, or a dud (ish) round. While manufacturing is in general very precise things can and will go wrong. 🤷♀️
I suspect it was a non-jacketed hollowpoint fragmentation round, custom loaded, so as to transmit all of the energy into the target and destroy the projectile in that energy transfer.
Custom loading is comon amongst hunters and enthusiasts.
https://youtu.be/fhRZ8ZFN6Ds?si=eUogqnyR7vo6Svk8
It glanced of the titanium sapi plate he wore near the upper edge, tumbled, struck his neck at the carotid, hooked in behind that muscle group and impacted his cervical vertebrae at C3-4, stopping there. That’s what high velocity projectiles do.
Army Ranger apparently hasn’t seen a .30 cal deflected by twigs, as they so often do.
No plate worn.
You can see it jump. Paramount Tactical went frame by frame.
https://youtu.be/fhRZ8ZFN6Ds?si=eUogqnyR7vo6Svk8
As President Trump said....that the bullet for Charlie was meant for all of us.
Times 2 as it so narrowly missed Trump at Butler.
And Charles Kirk now became a softer open target sacrifice lamb.
Trump ALLOWED this. His entire FBI is in on the coverup
Eventually this will be opened wider and shall be revealed.
The best of the worst things, often take way too much time.
https://youtu.be/fhRZ8ZFN6Ds?si=eUogqnyR7vo6Svk8
YES, YES, this is a video that I described later in these Comments that shows tan-clothes man purportedly using the flat gun against Charlie. There is also a larger, more focused and up-close, almost identical video somewhere out there (sorry, I didn't save it), that I describe later in these Comments. Please also see my Comment further down.
Jennifer, was it on rense.com? That's the one I saw. It's similiar to this one but only about 9 seconds long. I'm 77 yrs old and have seen these psyops so many times before in my life. I never believe what the government puts out there. This time is no different. It's a very sad situation. Blessings!!
Thank you!
https://youtu.be/fhRZ8ZFN6Ds?si=eUogqnyR7vo6Svk8
Please remember that as Christians we believe that 1) God has given us free will to choose good or evil ( otherwise there is no such thing as love because without free will there is no love) and 2) Satan is the ruler of this world and will be until the second coming. But the Bible teaches our God works all things to the good for those who love the Lord. It doesn’t teach exactly how, why or when . Unfortunately, it looks to me that in this relentless war by Satan on God’s creation, that sadly at this point in time, Turning Points has been captured.
As another commenter stated in another Substack, there were two people on a cross on either side of Jesus. One asked for forgiveness and was taken up to Paradise. The other was not. Jesus forgave the adulterer and told her to go, and sin no more. I, as a Christian, believe that forgiveness requires confession and repentance. If the perpetrator is not interested in your forgiveness, don’t allow hate for that person to consume you. God will, ultimately judge that person. It reminds me of the parable about the man who was forgiven of a debt, but when someone else was indebted to him, he did not forgive. We are to forgive those who trespass against us as we would want our trespasses to be forgiven. This is not blind forgiveness.
I too am a Christian, but an old lady. I believe Jesus is my Savior. I have seen miracles in my life. And I firmly know what the gospel says is true: absent from the body means present with the Lord. But unfortunately I have been through many “conspiracy” theories in my long life that turned out to be true. They have all been orchestrated by the CIA or CIA/Mossad. The most recent Covid debacle killed and maimed millions of innocent civilians worldwide wide and maimed our young troops with illegally forced medical experiments. I do not trust in my government and that includes the present ruling oligarchs. Turning Points USA looks like they are now controlled as is most of our government. I trust only in Jesus who redeemed me with his sacrifice on the cross.
Could be a miracle or more of a show by the beast system that we currentlyhave to deal with…when befriending the world, that is
Sounds like a message designed for Charlie's main constituency. Smells of psyop and coverup. Interesting that more than one individual have been propogating the same, almost identical message. It appears that the perps believe Charlie's followers to be gullible and naive, and unfortunately, if they believe this explanation of a miracle, they would be right.
Your words spoke to me! All things are possible through Christ!
Beautiful 🙏🏻
The Counter Revolution has now created a Counter Revival to join it. This is going to be big. Like Steven the first martyr praying for his murderers, Charlie has planted a seed that will be YUUGE. This is a mass harvesting event. Keep looking up; we're close. And remember, we're the King's Kids.
Considering that so many people are finding this story hard to believe (including myself), I think it would be a good idea to release the autopsy photos showing that there was no exit wound.
Is there any evidence that an autopsy was done?
My understanding is that the story that there was no exit wound came from the doctor who did the autopsy.
Came first from the camera mounted behind Kirk when examined by TP/USA, then shared with Candace Owens. Alex Jones has now talked to the same TP/USA source. That source talked to the ER surgeon and forwarded the surgeon's analysis to Jones and probably Owens. Surgeon claims the bullet deflected downward off Kirk's spine. Difficult to believe if the round was actually a 30-06 (which can sometimes pierce an engine block, even if the bullet isn't armor piercing). But still, an ER surgeon's report isn't an autopsy.
The same one that reported on JFK?
https://youtu.be/fhRZ8ZFN6Ds?si=eUogqnyR7vo6Svk8
As I recall, in the initial press conference on the day of the assassination, the Parkland doctors called JFK's throat wound an entry wound. They were later pressed by the Bethesda autopsy team not to repeat that assessment.
They'd need a autopsy for criminal prosecution, I think
Get in line - still waiting for JFKs autopsy report.
A custom lead, non-jacketed hollowpoint fragmentation round could have been loaded and used, and it was from very close, 30 yards, somewhere in the crowd,or one of those big bushes to Charlie's left.
More evidence that Tyler Robinson was not the shooter, but just the patsy.
Quote: Smartski@2Smartski·Sep 17
Acoustic analysis confirms shooter was near ground-level, ~70-90ft away — not a rooftop. Crack–bang intervals across all recordings: 0.08–0.14s = 70–90 ft distance (speed of sound @ 82°F = 1141 ft/s) Closest audio clip shows total crack/bang overlap, impact clear = <100 ft https://x.com/EmeraldRobinson/status/1969054789376901189
https://youtu.be/fhRZ8ZFN6Ds?si=eUogqnyR7vo6Svk8
. . . understatement.
https://youtu.be/fhRZ8ZFN6Ds?si=eUogqnyR7vo6Svk8
Saw two gun experts dispute the official story. They said that purported gun would have done far more damage. They say he wore no body armor. They think he was shot from the right behind his ear and the other wound IS the exit wound.
And where is the autopsy report???
Two wounds, one we saw, the other we didn't.
Low power, close range, security 'detail' took him out!
https://youtu.be/fhRZ8ZFN6Ds?si=eUogqnyR7vo6Svk8
You are so right about the loss of trust. The major side effect of such a loss is the spawning of all manner of conspiracy theories in very prolific quantities. That is what we are seeing in nearly all newsworthy events. What does one do when experience says that the official narrative is at least partially if not totally false, or at best it is incomplete? The powers that be that have complained about misinformation have brought it on themselves.
https://youtu.be/fhRZ8ZFN6Ds?si=eUogqnyR7vo6Svk8
1. Why wasn't there a ambulance on site for that large contentious event?
2. Why didn't they call 911? Instead they carried him to a SUV and drove him...glad there wasn't traffic!
3. Not a single drop of blood on the ground in the path around the SUV... nor on his shoes.
4. Tyler didn't have a rifle with him jumping off the roof... Nor did he toss it to the ground before climbing down. And that text exchange was FAKE
5. The supposed bullet I believe came from the left side of stage (if you're facing Charlie...slightly elevated...you can see a flash of light when he's shot...
6. THIS WHOLE EVENT JUST BROUGHT MILLIONS OF VOTERS TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!
7. We are ALL Charlie's now!!!
https://youtu.be/fhRZ8ZFN6Ds?si=eUogqnyR7vo6Svk8
Candace Owens saw the video footage from the camera behind Charlie and said there was "no gore" ie no blood. I suppose it is possible that she may simply not have seen a small entry wound depending on where it hit. My current theory matches yours, and explains why hand signals might be required. Those could have coordinated the shooters so that the nearby small caliber weapon sound was masked by the exactly timed decoy rifle shot. I am quite sure that if the claimed weapon and cartridge wasthe actual weapon used to murder Charlie, the damage to his head and neck would have been much more catastrophic. They say the bullet was found within his body. Maybe so. But we cannot believe anything they are saying.
YESSSSS!
https://youtu.be/fhRZ8ZFN6Ds?si=eUogqnyR7vo6Svk8
There is a theory that the bullet struck the edge of the body armor, deforming and deflecting upward. That might explain the relatively large entry wound and the lack of an exit wound. I’m not saying it’s correct, but it sounds plausible.
If you find the video clip of Charlie tossing MAGA hats to the crowd before he talked, you can see his body moving, muscle and fat, under his white cotton t-shirt. No body armor apparent.
His wife said in the New York Times interview that he wasn’t wearing body armor and pictures of the back of his t-shirt right before. do not evidence he was wearing any. My husband surmises the round may have been old, the powder old or underweight (it happens) or was a “dud” (for a 30-06) power wise. Stranger things have happened.
Could be a custom hollow point fragmentation load. People do custom load cartridges.
https://youtu.be/fhRZ8ZFN6Ds?si=eUogqnyR7vo6Svk8
Stranger things DID happen!
Yes, to no body armor.
No armor worn
https://youtu.be/fhRZ8ZFN6Ds?si=eUogqnyR7vo6Svk8
Close up assassin with the bullet hitting the left clavicle and being deflected upwards to penetrate the jugular. X-ray of Charles torso would confirm. Which makes sense if it was from a trajectory lower than his shoulder.
video I saw clearly showed his head bob forward indicating a hit below it and from FRONT.
Both sides! Watch.
https://youtu.be/fhRZ8ZFN6Ds?si=eUogqnyR7vo6Svk8
Don't be deceived in multiple theories.
https://youtu.be/fhRZ8ZFN6Ds?si=eUogqnyR7vo6Svk8
Can’t access because restricted mode is on. Do I have to subscribe to YouTube? Your view Plain and simple deranged kid?
I suspect the problem is not "that medical examiners are not diligently investigating" - rather that they are not honestly reporting.
https://youtu.be/fhRZ8ZFN6Ds?si=eUogqnyR7vo6Svk8
This;
https://x.com/RealPJGlassey/status/1969248552842117285
The murder site was never taped off or even investigated. In fact, it was immediately contaminated. Both high definition cameras were removed in under five minutes. The tent and stage were being broken down 10 minutes after the shot. The entire crime scene was gone within two hours, and the site was fully erased—demolished, rebuilt, and reopened to foot traffic—in less than a week. Even a rookie cop knows this is not how you handle a crime scene, especially when it is one of the highest profile assassinations in decades and they STILL HAVEN'T FOUND THE BULLET!!
Quite often, I'm amazed at John's body of knowledge. Though, he seems to know way too much for any individual and that comes across a foolish arrogance... A bit of a follow-up to Lowell's comment...
To wit, John's statement:
A 150-grain, .30-06 bullet's energy at 150 yards from the muzzle varies by ammunition, but a common hunting cartridge has an estimated value of approximately 1,800-2,000 foot-pounds (with the bullet traveling at about 2500 feet per second). In other words, the .30 caliber (.30 inch diameter) metal projectile struck his neck with sufficient kinetic energy to move a 2,000 pound mass a linear distance of one foot.
A response from one of the LLMs:
Evaluation of the .30-06 Bullet Energy Statement
The statement demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of physics concepts, specifically confusing kinetic energy with work capacity.
The ballistics data is reasonably accurate.
The Fundamental Physics Error
The critical flaw lies in the statement: "sufficient kinetic energy to move a 2,000 pound mass a linear distance of one foot."
Kinetic Energy vs. Work - Different Concepts, Same Units
Kinetic Energy (what the bullet possesses):
• Definition: Energy of motion = ½mv²
• Units: foot-pounds (ft-lbs)
• Nature: Energy stored in a moving object
Work (what's needed to move something):
• Definition: Force applied through distance = F × d
• Units: foot-pounds (ft-lbs) - same unit, completely different concept!
• To lift 2,000 lbs by 1 foot requires 2,000 ft-lbs of work
Why the Equivalence is Wrong
Unit Confusion: Both kinetic energy and mechanical work use foot-pounds, but they represent entirely different physical quantities. The foot-pound as an energy unit measures "the energy transferred upon applying a force of one pound-force through a linear displacement of one foot", not the capacity to lift specific weights.
Energy Transfer Efficiency: Bullet impacts are incredibly inefficient at converting kinetic energy to useful mechanical work. Most energy is lost to:
• Deformation of bullet and target
• Heat generation
• Sound production
• Tissue damage
Physical Reality Check: Even with perfect efficiency (impossible in reality), the bullet's ~2,000 ft-lbs could theoretically lift 2,000 pounds exactly 1 foot. With realistic efficiency (~10%), it could lift 2,000 pounds only about 1.2 inches.
The Correct Physics Understanding
The statement conflates energy with work capacity. While both use the same units, kinetic energy doesn't directly translate to lifting ability. The work-energy theorem states that work equals the change in kinetic energy, but this doesn't mean kinetic energy can be directly converted to mechanical work like lifting.
A bullet's kinetic energy represents its capacity to do damage through rapid deceleration and energy transfer upon impact, not its ability to perform mechanical work like lifting objects against gravity.
Conclusion: While the ballistics numbers are accurate, the physical interpretation demonstrates a poor understanding of fundamental physics concepts - specifically the difference between kinetic energy and mechanical work capacity.
John, you don't need to comment on everything in the world. Too many of your posts come across as "click bait" or "influencer-itis" or hubris...
The following pointers indicate - to me at least - that we the public have been sold a very big lie.
1. The red liquid from his neck came gushing in one constant 2-second stream, belying the fact that a pumping heart would have sent real blood in a series of bursts
2. He held onto the microphone in his left hand for nearly 2 seconds. Any AI search for the likelihood of this will come up negative. He should have dropped any object immediately.
3. The rush to contaminate the crime scene by disposing of everything there and quickly paving over the area where the police could have found bullet fragments / real or fake blood is criminally outrageous
4. The subsequent drivel about Charlie Kirk possessing bones that stop bullets is the icing on the toxic cake
Given the above, it's now sensible to assume that the jury can only be out on whether CK is alive or dead.
This is the most IMPORTANT:
"The trouble our Republic is facing now is that so many of us no longer trust our federal and state authorities to tell us the truth. "
how one can still trust anyone in medical field AFTER having millions of dying with WHITE CLOTS generated after the covid genetically modifying injections and NO ONE HEARS ABOUT IT, except for VERY FEW truthful embalmers???
Take another field: GEOENGINEERING with the most recent hearing about it:
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/events/geoengineering-report/mtg-hearing-political-theater-geoengineering-report/
it is ALL ABOUT a great THEATER, LIES, lethal ones, like the covid crimes...
https://youtu.be/fhRZ8ZFN6Ds?si=eUogqnyR7vo6Svk8
John, you beg the question: are all those mercilessly slaughtered by the covid shot , shot to death in an equally heinous, or more heinous, fashion than Charl ie? Both are utter and complete innocents, however much Charlie knew his risks whereas the poor dupes who took the shot simply believed, or were compelled to such a degree to overcome a rational doubt.
I am dumbfounded by the inhumanity of both.
https://youtu.be/fhRZ8ZFN6Ds?si=eUogqnyR7vo6Svk8
on the other hand, I would offer that:
YOUR inference of John's article "beg the question". . .
Is anyone able to say what those hand signals meant? Are they universal? I don't notice any hand signals in any other video at these university events of Charlies?
John Leake— I always appreciate your insight as a professional crime writer.
About SADS. It so happens that this weekend found me transcribing a couple of videos on SADS, one from 2021 and another from 2022. I personally know someone, previously healthy, who one sunny day planked on the sidewalk, dead. Fully boosted, yes.
About the heart. What has been well-documented is the damage the covid injections can do to the heart. But don't forget those white clots (fibrinaloid castings)— and who knows what else. Without autopsies, and reliable reports from those autopsies, we're all a bit lost in the woods of speculation. As you say, "The trouble our Republic is facing now is that so many of us no longer trust our federal and state authorities to tell us the truth."
They have NEVER told the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth!
The father of lies is running the world.
https://youtu.be/fhRZ8ZFN6Ds?si=eUogqnyR7vo6Svk8