You will be targeted, called names, and slandered if you do not adhere to the government narrative. Moreover, the trolls have invaded the Substack comments sections as they have everywhere else. They are usually recognizable by their adjectives (ridiculous, looney, et al) and their utter surprise that you could believe such conspiratorial nonesense. It's usually a sign that your writing has become significant when they show up. Anyway, I am sure you already know all of this. Keep telling the truth, you are appreciated.
Think back. Most assassinations of our presidents and key politicians have been attributed to young males in their early 20s.
Is it just by chance that they knew where to go and be in the right position to assassinate the individual?. in my mind it is managed and manipulation of young impressionable men that are still finding their way in life. Susceptible to hypnotic sessions..
Thank you for your thoughts on the Kirk assassination. What's your view on the claims by documentary film maker John Hankey, who thinks that POTUS Trump faked the assassination attempt on himself at Butler PA and murdered Corey Comperatore? ( Trump in the Crosshairs? Murder in Butler PA | https://youtu.be/rq2QFvWFUC0?si=uiCkhYmzom96n_gu )
Hankey claims that the tractor in front of the stage meant that Trump was never in the trajectory of a bullet, although Corey was.
Consider what's known about Thomas Crooks. Was he an autistic patsy, and easy to hypnotize? ( Those resistant to 'love hormone' may also be easier to hypnotize | Nature https://share.google/66nbtnUhVqJvGHHWN)
A very well construed article about an individual's perspective and the need for scrutiny in truth. I would agree that American's in general should always hold a candle to the truth. After all, was our Republic not founded on the necessary basis on an individual's rights and the freedom/liberty those rights should embody? Also true, in my opinion, is staying loyal to the basic principles of our founding. If someone is uncomfortable or unwilling to answer legitimate questions, particularly those who hold any authority in public service, then there is certainly room for skepticism. Political speak and legalese are definitely not synonymous with truth. Without truth, there can never be real justice. I truly know little about Charlie's assassination. The event was beyond tragic because he was making real progress in helping to enlighten younger generations with Christianity, healthy and spirited debate, conservative values, and common sense. He was uniting young people and reigniting those fires of liberty that have been glossed over far too long by complacency and ignorance. Did those things have any connection with his murder? I do not know. But I will say gifted people who make connections as he did with large groups of young people have a storied history of being silenced. That alone convinces me to stay interested and hope that justice is truly served with the truth. Charlie will be missed and his memory is best served in continuing to pursue those inalienable rights for which he stood so well. God has his soul, we have his legacy. Thank you for a great article. May God continue to bless you and yours. God help US and God bless America.
Well, I'll tell ya, in all my years I ain't never heard, seen nor smelt an issue that was so dangerous it couldn't be talked about. Hell yeah! I'm for debating anything. Rhode Island says yea! - Stephen Hopkins in 1776
From the first time I saw this video I questioned the official narrative of the murder. If the defense does not bring all of your questionable points into discussion than I can only assume the defense has been bought off as part of a coverup for protecting the real murderers.
Thank you, John. I appreciate the principles by which you govern your life. And there is a cost we all face for choosing truth over a government's narrative. This was seen during the Covid period. Any person that has a conscience cannot be made to do anything against themselves. But people make choices out of their own self interest or because they are afraid or both and compromise themselves and then feel victimized because of the choice they made.
What you wrote reminds me of a quote written in 1903 by the author, Ellen White, where she said, "The greatest want of the world is the want of men—men who will not be bought or sold, men who in their inmost souls are true and honest, men who do not fear to call sin by its right name, men whose conscience is as true to duty as the needle to the pole, men who will stand for the right though the heavens fall."
I agree 100% with your assessment. I do not trust the official narrative and I feel that there are too many questions about the physical evidence. It feels like an Op to me.
I think we need to wait for the trial to see all the evidence. I understand images of the bullet fragments were presented during the preliminary hearing. If you get hit by a bullet traveling beyond the speed of sound, do you think the energy at contact would cause the tee shirt to flutter? Let’s see what is presented at trial.
I could imagine a shock wave rippling through his t-shirt -- what strikes me as odd is that it billows up in the direction of the wound apparently before the wound appears, as though it was acted upon by gas ejecting from a source under the t-shirt. My point is that the defense should examine this closely and try to ascertain what happened to the device visible under his shirt in the video.
How about his security grabbing the chair he was sitting in and got up and removed the tape from the security camera and put it in his pocket. He took the evidence. Aside from that, the arena where his funeral was held, was booked a few months in advance.
My work gets maligned sometimes, in my Substack post comments. Or the work of those I cite. Often though the people attacking us do not have even an example they can use. They make sweeping assumptions or unsubstantiated judgements and expect I will just blindly agree. I don't play that game either.
You will be targeted, called names, and slandered if you do not adhere to the government narrative. Moreover, the trolls have invaded the Substack comments sections as they have everywhere else. They are usually recognizable by their adjectives (ridiculous, looney, et al) and their utter surprise that you could believe such conspiratorial nonesense. It's usually a sign that your writing has become significant when they show up. Anyway, I am sure you already know all of this. Keep telling the truth, you are appreciated.
Absolutely agree. Sticks and stones....we can handle it!
Think back. Most assassinations of our presidents and key politicians have been attributed to young males in their early 20s.
Is it just by chance that they knew where to go and be in the right position to assassinate the individual?. in my mind it is managed and manipulation of young impressionable men that are still finding their way in life. Susceptible to hypnotic sessions..
Thank you for your thoughts on the Kirk assassination. What's your view on the claims by documentary film maker John Hankey, who thinks that POTUS Trump faked the assassination attempt on himself at Butler PA and murdered Corey Comperatore? ( Trump in the Crosshairs? Murder in Butler PA | https://youtu.be/rq2QFvWFUC0?si=uiCkhYmzom96n_gu )
Hankey claims that the tractor in front of the stage meant that Trump was never in the trajectory of a bullet, although Corey was.
Consider what's known about Thomas Crooks. Was he an autistic patsy, and easy to hypnotize? ( Those resistant to 'love hormone' may also be easier to hypnotize | Nature https://share.google/66nbtnUhVqJvGHHWN)
MANY HAVE SHOWN Trums stuff was staged check out Mike Huggins
https://michaelhuggins50.substack.com/p/dr-faucis-fake-government-hearing?utm_source=substack&publication_id=1051764&post_id=209254506&utm_medium=email&utm_content=share&utm_campaign=email-share&t
Thanks for sharing.
God Bless you John! Stay True!
Thank you for this clarity. I am in agreement on the distrust for the powers that be. Understood.
A very well construed article about an individual's perspective and the need for scrutiny in truth. I would agree that American's in general should always hold a candle to the truth. After all, was our Republic not founded on the necessary basis on an individual's rights and the freedom/liberty those rights should embody? Also true, in my opinion, is staying loyal to the basic principles of our founding. If someone is uncomfortable or unwilling to answer legitimate questions, particularly those who hold any authority in public service, then there is certainly room for skepticism. Political speak and legalese are definitely not synonymous with truth. Without truth, there can never be real justice. I truly know little about Charlie's assassination. The event was beyond tragic because he was making real progress in helping to enlighten younger generations with Christianity, healthy and spirited debate, conservative values, and common sense. He was uniting young people and reigniting those fires of liberty that have been glossed over far too long by complacency and ignorance. Did those things have any connection with his murder? I do not know. But I will say gifted people who make connections as he did with large groups of young people have a storied history of being silenced. That alone convinces me to stay interested and hope that justice is truly served with the truth. Charlie will be missed and his memory is best served in continuing to pursue those inalienable rights for which he stood so well. God has his soul, we have his legacy. Thank you for a great article. May God continue to bless you and yours. God help US and God bless America.
This brings to mind one of my favorite quotes:
Well, I'll tell ya, in all my years I ain't never heard, seen nor smelt an issue that was so dangerous it couldn't be talked about. Hell yeah! I'm for debating anything. Rhode Island says yea! - Stephen Hopkins in 1776
From the first time I saw this video I questioned the official narrative of the murder. If the defense does not bring all of your questionable points into discussion than I can only assume the defense has been bought off as part of a coverup for protecting the real murderers.
Thank you, John. I appreciate the principles by which you govern your life. And there is a cost we all face for choosing truth over a government's narrative. This was seen during the Covid period. Any person that has a conscience cannot be made to do anything against themselves. But people make choices out of their own self interest or because they are afraid or both and compromise themselves and then feel victimized because of the choice they made.
What you wrote reminds me of a quote written in 1903 by the author, Ellen White, where she said, "The greatest want of the world is the want of men—men who will not be bought or sold, men who in their inmost souls are true and honest, men who do not fear to call sin by its right name, men whose conscience is as true to duty as the needle to the pole, men who will stand for the right though the heavens fall."
Already missing from public affairs in 1903!
Amen!
Right on, John. It's best to be a cult of one. 🤣
Fair!
I'm a "rogue bovine" too, John. ;-)
I agree 100% with your assessment. I do not trust the official narrative and I feel that there are too many questions about the physical evidence. It feels like an Op to me.
I think we need to wait for the trial to see all the evidence. I understand images of the bullet fragments were presented during the preliminary hearing. If you get hit by a bullet traveling beyond the speed of sound, do you think the energy at contact would cause the tee shirt to flutter? Let’s see what is presented at trial.
I could imagine a shock wave rippling through his t-shirt -- what strikes me as odd is that it billows up in the direction of the wound apparently before the wound appears, as though it was acted upon by gas ejecting from a source under the t-shirt. My point is that the defense should examine this closely and try to ascertain what happened to the device visible under his shirt in the video.
How about his security grabbing the chair he was sitting in and got up and removed the tape from the security camera and put it in his pocket. He took the evidence. Aside from that, the arena where his funeral was held, was booked a few months in advance.
Appreciate all the work you do. Blessings!!
how do we know they are the real bullet fragments?
Define "all the evidence". Are you referring to that offered by the state?
Hmm...no big deal, but meant to reply to Maria, not Lori.
My work gets maligned sometimes, in my Substack post comments. Or the work of those I cite. Often though the people attacking us do not have even an example they can use. They make sweeping assumptions or unsubstantiated judgements and expect I will just blindly agree. I don't play that game either.
You asked questions in your previous post that need to be shared with Tyler Robinson's defense team.
Thank you, John! We appreciate that you always ask appropriate questions and carefully consider whatever you write about.