"The word vaccine refers to various technologies for intervening in the complex biology of the body to induce immunity to various pathogens."
That technical terms have a single meaning - monosemous - is an absolutely fundamental necessity of science. Unique causes cannot be specified, nor can unique observables be predicted, if terms are ambiguous in meaning.
A vaccine has always been a direct immunogen. A material that in and of itself induces an immune response against a disease organism. An antigen.
An mRNA drug is not a direct immunogen. It is not in and of itself an antigen.
Combining immunogenic agents (vaccines) and mRNA as "various technologies for intervening in the complex biology of the body to induce immunity to various pathogens" ambiguates a distinction that should be absolutely clear.
'Not to worry, Ms. Smith," says the physician, mRNA-filled syringe in hand. 'We're just giving you and your children a technology for intervening in the complex biology of the body to induce immunity to circulating pathogens. They've been in regular use for over 100 years. Fot adults and well-baby care.'
Ambiguating meaning allows passing over critical information in silence. It is to mislead.
There are already many smarmy self-interested pseudo-authorities ready, eager, and able to promote their dangerous ew technologies under a comforting umbrella of fuzzing its identity under classical terms.
It's tempting to give in, perhaps. It's easy to give in, certainly. Doing so avoids conflict.
But hold the line of distinction between a vaccine and an mRNA product. Science demands it. Honesty demands it. Informed consent demands it. Safety demands it.
mRNA products are not vaccines. They're not merely, "technologies for intervening in the complex biology of the body to induce immunity to various pathogens."
They're technologies that intervene in the complex biology of the body, forcing it to make and express foreign proteins in whatever tissue they invade.
They are dangerous inflammogens.
That fact should never be hidden under fuzzy self-serving feel-good re-definitions.
Over the past 4 years a tragic irony has emerged: What was marketed "for the greater good" has hurt and killed people. A consequence is that the U. S. public has developed distrust in the government and in our allopathic medicine. Data presented to the public have been manipulated and fraudulent. I believe that a growing number of citizens now understand why our country is the sickest on the planet despite taking more medicine, undergoing more standard procedures, and paying more for treatment. This tragedy -- with the sacrifice of 1 or 2 generations of children who suffer neurological damage or who have been diagnosed with disorders which weren't in the DSM when I was in grad school and believe "there's something wrong with my brain" -- should ultimately fuel a healthier medical system.
Mosby's 7th edition (renowned medical dictionary) was on my daily reading list for many years. Two weeks BEFORE the change in definition of "vaccine" was announced, I was pointing out THE FACT that these gene therapy products DID NOT MEET THE STANDARD, ACCEPTED DEFINITION OF "VACCINE". Obviously...someone lied...at a magnitude never before seen. Will Mosby's retract and revise their long standing medical/scientific definition now, or will the fake claim MADE on record now be corrected. Covid 19 "vaccines" ARE NOT real "vaccines". Children are being harmed for profit. Investors in these companies should take a moral stand and withdraw their funds FROM THE MARKET permanently...and invest in something useful and helpful...like the Wellness Company.
Risks are part of life, the management of growing older and wiser.
There are many varieties of "RISK".
There are calculated risk factoids in general treated medical health and daily existence.
The Covid Jab Theater was already labeled by law as "UNAVOIDABLY UNSAFE".
Your "Risk" factors were stripped from you and replaced by fear porn never before seen.
This was an intelligence test the magnitude of which challenged your very mind and body.
Personal Choice became illegal and outlawed. .GOV showed it's ugly intentions against us.
We must never forget that they declared war on a human population. Not the Virus makers.
Hopefully, I will PASS the IQ test next time.
I failed to understand the complexity, the nuance, the gravity, and the terminal ramifications on that first go. Too late?
Oh, well SHIT@!
"The word vaccine refers to various technologies for intervening in the complex biology of the body to induce immunity to various pathogens."
That technical terms have a single meaning - monosemous - is an absolutely fundamental necessity of science. Unique causes cannot be specified, nor can unique observables be predicted, if terms are ambiguous in meaning.
A vaccine has always been a direct immunogen. A material that in and of itself induces an immune response against a disease organism. An antigen.
An mRNA drug is not a direct immunogen. It is not in and of itself an antigen.
Combining immunogenic agents (vaccines) and mRNA as "various technologies for intervening in the complex biology of the body to induce immunity to various pathogens" ambiguates a distinction that should be absolutely clear.
'Not to worry, Ms. Smith," says the physician, mRNA-filled syringe in hand. 'We're just giving you and your children a technology for intervening in the complex biology of the body to induce immunity to circulating pathogens. They've been in regular use for over 100 years. Fot adults and well-baby care.'
Ambiguating meaning allows passing over critical information in silence. It is to mislead.
There are already many smarmy self-interested pseudo-authorities ready, eager, and able to promote their dangerous ew technologies under a comforting umbrella of fuzzing its identity under classical terms.
It's tempting to give in, perhaps. It's easy to give in, certainly. Doing so avoids conflict.
But hold the line of distinction between a vaccine and an mRNA product. Science demands it. Honesty demands it. Informed consent demands it. Safety demands it.
mRNA products are not vaccines. They're not merely, "technologies for intervening in the complex biology of the body to induce immunity to various pathogens."
They're technologies that intervene in the complex biology of the body, forcing it to make and express foreign proteins in whatever tissue they invade.
They are dangerous inflammogens.
That fact should never be hidden under fuzzy self-serving feel-good re-definitions.
Over the past 4 years a tragic irony has emerged: What was marketed "for the greater good" has hurt and killed people. A consequence is that the U. S. public has developed distrust in the government and in our allopathic medicine. Data presented to the public have been manipulated and fraudulent. I believe that a growing number of citizens now understand why our country is the sickest on the planet despite taking more medicine, undergoing more standard procedures, and paying more for treatment. This tragedy -- with the sacrifice of 1 or 2 generations of children who suffer neurological damage or who have been diagnosed with disorders which weren't in the DSM when I was in grad school and believe "there's something wrong with my brain" -- should ultimately fuel a healthier medical system.
Mosby's 7th edition (renowned medical dictionary) was on my daily reading list for many years. Two weeks BEFORE the change in definition of "vaccine" was announced, I was pointing out THE FACT that these gene therapy products DID NOT MEET THE STANDARD, ACCEPTED DEFINITION OF "VACCINE". Obviously...someone lied...at a magnitude never before seen. Will Mosby's retract and revise their long standing medical/scientific definition now, or will the fake claim MADE on record now be corrected. Covid 19 "vaccines" ARE NOT real "vaccines". Children are being harmed for profit. Investors in these companies should take a moral stand and withdraw their funds FROM THE MARKET permanently...and invest in something useful and helpful...like the Wellness Company.
No