Acute reaction to vaccines immediately followed by regression into autism has been rigorously documented thousands of times and cannot be attributed to “survey bias.”
I’ve noticed that there is autism propaganda woven into TV shows. They’re portraying autistic persons as the most amazing, attractive, high-functioning geniuses. And trying to normalize autism. One example: the British series “Astrid”. Also many other examples, always portraying the autistic individual in this way. Of course, this all started with the film “Rain Man”. It’s probably happening with new films also, but I don’t watch any new movies any more, as they’re all crap.
No, really. What is the genesis of the "specialty"?
Pediatricians are vaccine sellers. They have legitimate use as normal physicians tending to humans, but largely--today anyway--they exist to mark birthdays with mileage markers and vaccines.
Find an office that does not have a written policy: no vaccination, no service. Criminal, when one gets down to it: vaccine makers apparently have cash incentives to pediatricians, for no one would turn away a paying client from a business opportunity unless the payoff exceeded the client's marginal value.
In such case, WHY would a vaccine-aligned pediatrician EVER open his ears to challenge, unless he had a conscience. But, if that, he would have dumped vaccine cartel membership long, long ago.
Suspect that pediatrician business as of today is at risk of major litigation for blanket denial of service for incompatible vaccine compliance by parents.
Maybe the McCullough Foundation or Steve could collect and do a compilation of videos of autistic children before and after vaccination and send to FDA, CDC, RFK, NIH, Trump...surely. parents today have such videos.
John as a true crime guy why isn’t a trial by jury scenario used on the pharmaceutical industry who is gas lighting the world. If a defendant can be sent to the gas chamber based on circumstantial evidence why not pharma. At what point does the preponderance of evidence equal a conviction?
Anecdotal evidence becomes a straw man for science to hold out as a defense. If I know five people who take the same bear trail and they all come back bitten and clawed up by bears I won’t go down that trail. And I don’t blame the trail for all the bear caused injuries even though I didn’t actually see the bear. The trail didn’t cause the injuries. Anecdotal evidence is enough for me and the local authorities to close the trail. No gold standard study is required by anyone.
Pharma and Science hide behind anecdotal evidence as a means of obtaining funding and maintaining authority over common sense. Every other standard of recognition of danger is meaningless.
At what point will anecdotal evidence be seen as a spectrum and assigned a grade that gives it value and a use comparable to the gold standard scientific evidence. At some point the preponderance of evidence should put the onus on industry to prove its conclusions beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury of non experts. Gas Lighting is not a Gold Standard and a jury would expose the fallacy of the gold standard in everyday life. We don’t live in a test tube or a lab.
Thank you and Steve you both have my love and respect for all you do for my family, friends and myself. The world owes you a huge debt of gratitude. We need you both more than ever.
Seems counterproductive for gates to be supposedly stopping malaria with his mosquitoes when he wants to depopulate the planet. He like his father wants less of "us"
It's F***ing insane! This On-going murderous crime wave makes my blood boil (and loose "civility" as righteous anger mounts) Going forward, and with all that can be easily learned about the harms of VAXXines, I'm tempted to feel nearly as angry at any parent vaccinating their child as I do at the heartless bastards in medical and pharmaceutical professions committing these massacres. Parents need to own some responsibility--despite the system set up so comprehensively to fool them into participating in the profound harm to their own offspring. All those innocent defenseless babies being assaulted, going through such pain and destruction of their future and very lives. It's an absolutely disgusting disgrace--and Hell needs be paid by those most truly responsible.
It truly is a crime.
I’ve noticed that there is autism propaganda woven into TV shows. They’re portraying autistic persons as the most amazing, attractive, high-functioning geniuses. And trying to normalize autism. One example: the British series “Astrid”. Also many other examples, always portraying the autistic individual in this way. Of course, this all started with the film “Rain Man”. It’s probably happening with new films also, but I don’t watch any new movies any more, as they’re all crap.
Thanks for all you do.
Great that you're highlighting Steve's survey results. Keep doing what you're doing.
What is a pediatrician?
No, really. What is the genesis of the "specialty"?
Pediatricians are vaccine sellers. They have legitimate use as normal physicians tending to humans, but largely--today anyway--they exist to mark birthdays with mileage markers and vaccines.
Find an office that does not have a written policy: no vaccination, no service. Criminal, when one gets down to it: vaccine makers apparently have cash incentives to pediatricians, for no one would turn away a paying client from a business opportunity unless the payoff exceeded the client's marginal value.
In such case, WHY would a vaccine-aligned pediatrician EVER open his ears to challenge, unless he had a conscience. But, if that, he would have dumped vaccine cartel membership long, long ago.
Suspect that pediatrician business as of today is at risk of major litigation for blanket denial of service for incompatible vaccine compliance by parents.
Maybe the McCullough Foundation or Steve could collect and do a compilation of videos of autistic children before and after vaccination and send to FDA, CDC, RFK, NIH, Trump...surely. parents today have such videos.
Thank you John and Steve.
John as a true crime guy why isn’t a trial by jury scenario used on the pharmaceutical industry who is gas lighting the world. If a defendant can be sent to the gas chamber based on circumstantial evidence why not pharma. At what point does the preponderance of evidence equal a conviction?
Anecdotal evidence becomes a straw man for science to hold out as a defense. If I know five people who take the same bear trail and they all come back bitten and clawed up by bears I won’t go down that trail. And I don’t blame the trail for all the bear caused injuries even though I didn’t actually see the bear. The trail didn’t cause the injuries. Anecdotal evidence is enough for me and the local authorities to close the trail. No gold standard study is required by anyone.
Pharma and Science hide behind anecdotal evidence as a means of obtaining funding and maintaining authority over common sense. Every other standard of recognition of danger is meaningless.
At what point will anecdotal evidence be seen as a spectrum and assigned a grade that gives it value and a use comparable to the gold standard scientific evidence. At some point the preponderance of evidence should put the onus on industry to prove its conclusions beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury of non experts. Gas Lighting is not a Gold Standard and a jury would expose the fallacy of the gold standard in everyday life. We don’t live in a test tube or a lab.
Thank you and Steve you both have my love and respect for all you do for my family, friends and myself. The world owes you a huge debt of gratitude. We need you both more than ever.
Lee Kelley
Seems counterproductive for gates to be supposedly stopping malaria with his mosquitoes when he wants to depopulate the planet. He like his father wants less of "us"
It's the vector that's important. It can be re-purposed....
It's F***ing insane! This On-going murderous crime wave makes my blood boil (and loose "civility" as righteous anger mounts) Going forward, and with all that can be easily learned about the harms of VAXXines, I'm tempted to feel nearly as angry at any parent vaccinating their child as I do at the heartless bastards in medical and pharmaceutical professions committing these massacres. Parents need to own some responsibility--despite the system set up so comprehensively to fool them into participating in the profound harm to their own offspring. All those innocent defenseless babies being assaulted, going through such pain and destruction of their future and very lives. It's an absolutely disgusting disgrace--and Hell needs be paid by those most truly responsible.