"Newspeak" is used in George Orwell's dystopian novel 1984. Written in 1948, this book, with its authoritarian predictions or warnings, is especially relevant today. I highly recommend reading it even if "Big Brother is Watching" as he no doubt is here.
That was a book we read in senior year of high school and in 2020 right after the “election”.. got myself another copy and read it again..I knew what they would try..demratz never have an original thought.
Gaslight was a thriller set in Victorian times in England where a man tries to make his wife believe she is going insane by dimming the gas lights (before electric light became common) by shutting down the flow of gas from time to time. When she said the lights had dimmed he told her that was not the case. Happily she is saved at the end,
When I was looking at all the difference scenarios of gaslighting I came across this information. Perfect example. How god awful to be married to a manipulative person.
Gaslight were used on streets and in homes before electric lighting became available. Gasligting means; manipulate (someone) using psychological methods into questioning their own sanity or powers of reasoning.
Gaslighting is an excellent term, and it can be used by anybody.
It simply means resetting some everyday event in a way that tends to imply its opposite; ie everything you thought you knew and understood suddenly becomes much more vague and uncertain and capable of being seen in a different light altogether.
Hence the "gaslight."
It is always used pejoratively, but it can also be used to throw something which is received wisdom into a completely different light - I enjoy doing it with regard to things which are almost universally believed in, like "gravity," which as I can show in a moment of inspired gaslighting, is a completely ridiculous idea, and one which should have been abandoned as soon as Newton thought of it.
"gravity," which as I can show in a moment of inspired gaslighting, is a completely ridiculous idea"~Tim Webb
Webb is galighting the forum with this pseudoscience bullshit about gravity. Gravity has to do with the mass of two bodies in space; the gravitational pull between two objects is directly proportional to their masses.
Here's a breakdown of how gravity works, from the classical Newtonian view to the modern understanding from Einstein. Newtonian gravity (Gravity as a force) Sir Isaac Newton described gravity as a force of attraction between any two objects with mass. The strength of this force is determined by two factors: The masses of the objects: Objects with more mass have a stronger gravitational pull. The Earth has a stronger gravitational field than the Moon because it is far more massive.The distance between the objects: The gravitational force weakens with distance following an inverse-square law, meaning that if you double the distance, the force becomes one-quarter as strong. Newton's formula for the gravitational force (\(F\)) between two objects is:\(F=G\frac{m_{1}m_{2}}{r^{2}}\)Where: \(G\) is the gravitational constant.\(m_{1}\) and \(m_{2}\) are the masses of the two objects.\(r\) is the distance between the centers of the two masses. Einstein's general relativity (Gravity as curved spacetime) Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity reframed our understanding of gravity, moving beyond Newton's description of it as a mysterious "action at a distance". Gravity is the curvature of spacetime: According to this theory, mass and energy cause spacetime to curve. We experience the effects of this curvature as gravity.A "bowling ball on a trampoline" analogy: A common analogy is a bowling ball sitting on a stretched-out trampoline.The flat, unstretched trampoline represents empty, "flat" spacetime.The bowling ball, a massive object, creates a curved dimple in the trampoline sheet.If you roll a marble nearby, it will follow the curvature created by the bowling ball and roll toward it, not because it is being "pulled," but because it is following the most direct path along the curved surface. "Mass differentials" and gravitational anomalies While gravity doesn't arise from a difference in mass, you might be thinking of local gravitational variations, sometimes called "gravity anomalies". The Earth's gravitational pull is not perfectly uniform across its surface.Slight variations in the density of material beneath the surface—for example, a dense mountain range versus a deep ocean trench—can be measured with sensitive instruments.In this context, the difference in the amount of mass in a given volume (its density) does cause a slight difference in the gravitational pull at that location.
However, this is not the fundamental cause of gravity itself. The baseline force of gravity comes from the total mass of the object, like Earth, and the idea of "mass differential gravity" is more relevant to measuring small, localized variations in a larger gravitational field.
This reminds me of the guy a couple of years back, trying to see if the Earth is really round instead of a flat planet. He was smart enough to make a rocket device that launched him very high, except the parachute landing system was not as advanced and failed. I wonder what his last thoughts were?
Hah! Phil I have debated many 'Flat Earthers" it is astonishing how many beliive this bullshit! Communication satellites are what makes it possible to link to the Internet. Just that fact alone destroys all their goofy arguments.
That's always the way with gaslighting - you don't know it's being done if it's done subtly!
Wm. Casey was an ex-director of the CIA, and he is known for having said, "When everything the American people believe is false, then our job will be done."
So there's a lot of gaslighting that's been sent your way during your lifetime.
Alas, it's not democrat vs republican, we are all one people, and those are two wings of the same captured government vulture terrorizing us and picking us clean. There are only liberal vs independent vs conservative values. Here is those liberal values in action (they are victims who've been lead down into a very black dungeon - they've been brainwashed by advanced political psychological warfare and manipulation - and we've got to find a way to get them back to reality or we will all be divided and conquered without them firing a shot - we will end up shooting one another for them):
Here is an impassioned blistering plea about democrat compassion from a legal immigrant:
Not long after I came to America, I was exposed to the narrative that the Democrat Party was the party of the little guy and the only party with genuine care and compassion for the average American. Fortunately, because I grew up under a dictatorship, I could not be easily fooled by socioeconomic shackles masquerading as compassionate public policy. The truth is there is no compassion like Democrat compassion. It is the kind of compassion that lets people shoot illicit drugs into their body with the government's assistance. It is the kind of compassion that sees assisted suicide as a moral virtue. Democrat compassion is the kind of compassion that lets you rob the innocent in hardworking businesses in your neighborhood and walk out with impunity with no fear of prosecution.
Democrat compassion is the kind of compassion that tells vulnerable women it is their right to abort and sacrifice their unborn children on the perverted altar of female empowerment and convenience. Democrat compassion is the kind of compassion that tells children they were born in the wrong body and encourages and subsidizes their mutilation. Democrat compassion is the kind of compassion that lets boys unfairly compete against girls and take their records, their opportunities, and their scholarships, and invade their private spaces turning back decades of hard-fought gains. https://old.bitchute.com/video/km6W0evMlQQ5 [4:37mins]
Sabina Speilrein "I must admit that I greatly fear that my friend [Jung], who planned to mention my idea (of archetypes in our collective unconscious, about death-rebirth) in his article in July, saying that I have rights of priority, may simply borrow the whole development of the idea, because he now wants to refer to it as early as January. … How could I esteem a person who stole my ideas, who was not my friend but a petty, scheming rival?" Jung was a serial cheater who forced his family to include his mistress into their home. Emma, Jung's wife was wealthy and refined, Jung was uncouth, if she divorced him, he could choose to leave her without any of her assets that she brought to the marriage. We need to have a balanced view on patriarchy; its aspects of bravery, innovation, cruelty and how it can manifest in destructive subjugation of others. Fortunately, times have changed and will continue to do so.
This observation is explained by the saying, "The exception proves the rule," as Jung and his kind are by no means to be conflated with the majority of men, who, morality aside, have done, and continue to do, all the things the OP mentioned.
One wonders why his wife, if "wealthy and refined," chose to cohabit with a man so obviously her moral inferior, although wealth and refinement are not generally thought to exclude the possibility of infidelity, and/or uncouthness in private.
Perhaps she was driven by her emotions, not by her logic, which is the besetting sin of most women.
But I have major reservations about your statement, "The times have changed."
They are very much what they have always been, and will continue to be.
People married young back then, it was the culture, it takes a long time to get to know someone. Unfortunately, pornography is so rampant today that I am compelled to disagree with your opinion on the sexual morality of the majority. I wish the ideal was true, but it is not.
But sexual morality is as under strain amongst women as it is amongst men, so it would be wrong to blame "the patriarchy" for this situation - females have embraced the new normal enthusiastically, as with the OnlyFans phenomenon.
I was putting sexual morality under the umbrella for both genders if you refer back to my comment, majority points to the word 'people' not simply men. You missed my point in my first comment on patriarchy. The 'patriarchal system' at that time, held that if Emma for sound reasons divorced her husband, she would lose control of her own money. That is in the past though, society has moved on, and it will change again as industry and economy drive cultural norms, and we are now entering the age of robotics and AI.
You started off by decrying Jung's sexual immorality, and contrasted it with his wife's "wealth and refinement," so no obvious acknowledgement of the sexual immorality of both sexes, which you are now attesting to.
The first usage of the word "majority" was from me, and referred to men exclusively, so when you use the word later, the average reader would assume that you too are referring to men only, especially as you never used the word "people", as you are now stating, but rather, "someone, " by which again the average reader would assume you are using the pronoun to refer to Jung.
Now the patriarchal system at the time definitely favoured men, as women were thought to be too "hysterical" to order their own affairs ( the word refers to the female womb, which was thought, rightly or wrongly, to be the seat of their emotions ) but it would be reasonable to ask if that possibly unfair system has now inadvertently brought about the "No Fault Divorce" situation, whereby a woman, for no obvious reason whatsoever, maybe just "incompatibility," can divorce her husband, take at least half of his property, together with a substantial yearly sum in maintenance whether for her alone, or for her and any children which it might be hoped survive this destruction of the family - so has a more matriarchal system delivered the utopian world that women had agitated for ever since they were first exposed to the destabilizing and destructive influence of those first feminists, all of whom seem to have similar-sounding and ethnically-related surnames?
So society may have "moved on," but what has it left behind in the dust - things which in retrospect, we probably would not have wished it to?
And given that divorces today ( but obviously, for the reasons you gave, not in the past ) are generally initiated by the female partner, with all the implications for the children, is it not at least strongly arguable that we ought never to have abandoned those principles which we had in the past?
In other words, maybe the tried-and-tested patriarchal model is the one we should have stuck to.
Anyone who thinks its the Democrats, or the Republicans, needs to hurry up and take the red pill. There is NO 2-party political system running America, there is only one party controlling America, and every other country on the planet. The llluminati, the 13 bloodlines that secretly run the World.
I have, in the past, always been in agreement with your commentary. I do take some offense in your ending statement about thanking the “patriarchy” the next time I need a plumber, etc. Having spent 25 years as a professional “handyma’am”, building bookcases, changing/repairing plumbing and electrical fixtures, hanging wallpaper, and repairing drywall, etc. I have rarely called on “the patriarchy” to fix anything and that includes my husband, who has other talents that do not include typical “manly” pursuits. Please do better. I know several other women who are way more handy than their male partners.
was TriTorch talking about 0% vs 100% . . . or was he talking about relative percentages (somewhere between 0%-100%) where the actual numbers depend on the specifics being discussed?
Their husbands just allow them to think it, so they can watch the game instead of putting up shelves, or whatever the latest thing is that she wants done.
I am by no means denigrating men or their incontrovertible contribution to family and the development of this country. Everyone has a responsibility to use their talents in ways that benefit themselves, their families and this nation. You, on the other hand, are denigrating women as being incapable of handling pursuits usually taken on by men and accusing them of being mere harpies who constantly harass men to do things for them.
But I don't think I ever said that women were incapable of doing these things; rather, that the majority have no talent for them.
As for them constantly harassing men to do things for them, the thing seems to be that they always want what they can't have, so they see this as a challenge, ie to harass the man until they get as many things as they can have, before moving on to the next thing they can't have.
It's a kind of madness that women, whether singly or en masse, are all too prone to.
I actually just shared it with full credit on Unreported Truths (Alex Berenson's substack) because that community would really love it (hope Alex isn't offended but my guess is he will enjoy it)
This is fabulous! But I am devil-sceptic. I don't think they will be able to cease this kind of verbal littering. They have little if any self-control. Gavin may be able to do it, in his desperation to appear to be a normal person, but his hands will continue to gesticulate madly. However, academia, the media and the freaks on the street will continue with the nonsense. It is as if they all have Tourette syndrome.
WW, No need to use the F-word here, you are demonstrating who you are - unhinged.
Never voted or was a Democrat. I want what is best for America and the American people, not the 1% Psychopaths. Dictator Trump and his Fascist Cabal is Far Right.
"Dictator Trump and his Fascist Cabal is Far Right."~Alberto Venezio, who hasn't the personal honor to capitalize his own name.
The term "fuck" is in common use in the English speaking world today ever since the George Carlin's skit; "Seven Dirty Words". "Fuck" is commonly used in modern movies. So using the term "fuck" harldly means that someone is unhinged.
So as I postulated you were indeed specking about Trump and his supporters . Now calling him a "dictator" and his supporters a "Fascist Cabal of the Far Right.
Now that sir is truly unhinged.
Trump and his supporters are U.S Nationalists. He and we support the US Constitution and admire the beautiful eloquence of the Declaration of Independence.
We grasp that our inalienable rights to Liberty are not granted by government but by the Creator. We have been opposed to all the bullshit this article speaks to; the Neo-Marxist LGBTQ nonsense, Diversity Equity Inclusion (DEI), the absurdity that men can become pregnant, that there is no distinction between the 2 genders. That so-called "trans athletes" should be allowed to patricipate in women's sports.
You disingenuously claim that you are not a Democrat...you obviously did not vote for Trump, so you either voted for that cackling bitch Kamala, or you didn't vote. Your intencity in this forum suggests that you are lying that you did in fact vote for the Democrat nominee.
There is much in you that demonstrates your disingenuous rhetorical sophistry and lack of candor.
It would be wise of you to not challenge me again with your obvious bullshit. It is not going well for you whether you realize it or not.
You need help. I never voted Republican or Democrat in over 4 decades, I only ever voted for Perot to avoid the Clinton/Bush I gutting of the US manufacturing industry and involvement in Foreign Wars. You are fooled by the Uniparty and you spout BS!
I have no fear of you, Trump or anyone else and you are a Coward to Threaten online. You dish it out by the truck load but can't take any kind of a pushback - because your entire ideology is a house of cards as is your boy Trump the Traitor.
Far Left is Communism and Far Right is Fascism and they do the same awful things to the people. Did you not see a Clown Like Biden drive voters to a Clown like Trump. Go back in your basement.
Your boy Traitor Trump pushed the Bioweapon Jabs on us too!
Here were your words Coward:
"It would be wise of you to not challenge me again with your obvious bullshit. It is not going well for you whether you realize it or not."
"Newspeak" is used in George Orwell's dystopian novel 1984. Written in 1948, this book, with its authoritarian predictions or warnings, is especially relevant today. I highly recommend reading it even if "Big Brother is Watching" as he no doubt is here.
That was a book we read in senior year of high school and in 2020 right after the “election”.. got myself another copy and read it again..I knew what they would try..demratz never have an original thought.
I got my family and friends to read it during last couple of years.
Add Aldus Huxleys Brave New World to your library as well!!
for those who don't want to read, there are at least two good movies, one or maybe both used to be available on youtube.
Sandy is reluctant at the moment to admit it, but will eventually, that 2 + 2 = 5.
made me laugh. Sandy will eventually learn to love Big Brother.
:))
Splended summary of the lunatic Leftist Democrats.
\\][//
Agree 💯 It's hysterical that they can't see the irony of self censorship. 😂 They can go F themselves.
You forgot gaslighting. I can't seem to remember what that means. Great list!
Gaslight was a thriller set in Victorian times in England where a man tries to make his wife believe she is going insane by dimming the gas lights (before electric light became common) by shutting down the flow of gas from time to time. When she said the lights had dimmed he told her that was not the case. Happily she is saved at the end,
My first ex husband gaslit me often. I didn’t know the term at the time, but I told people he would make me question the color of the sky!
When I was looking at all the difference scenarios of gaslighting I came across this information. Perfect example. How god awful to be married to a manipulative person.
Nadine,
Gaslight were used on streets and in homes before electric lighting became available. Gasligting means; manipulate (someone) using psychological methods into questioning their own sanity or powers of reasoning.
\\][//
Gaslighting is an excellent term, and it can be used by anybody.
It simply means resetting some everyday event in a way that tends to imply its opposite; ie everything you thought you knew and understood suddenly becomes much more vague and uncertain and capable of being seen in a different light altogether.
Hence the "gaslight."
It is always used pejoratively, but it can also be used to throw something which is received wisdom into a completely different light - I enjoy doing it with regard to things which are almost universally believed in, like "gravity," which as I can show in a moment of inspired gaslighting, is a completely ridiculous idea, and one which should have been abandoned as soon as Newton thought of it.
"gravity," which as I can show in a moment of inspired gaslighting, is a completely ridiculous idea"~Tim Webb
Webb is galighting the forum with this pseudoscience bullshit about gravity. Gravity has to do with the mass of two bodies in space; the gravitational pull between two objects is directly proportional to their masses.
Here's a breakdown of how gravity works, from the classical Newtonian view to the modern understanding from Einstein. Newtonian gravity (Gravity as a force) Sir Isaac Newton described gravity as a force of attraction between any two objects with mass. The strength of this force is determined by two factors: The masses of the objects: Objects with more mass have a stronger gravitational pull. The Earth has a stronger gravitational field than the Moon because it is far more massive.The distance between the objects: The gravitational force weakens with distance following an inverse-square law, meaning that if you double the distance, the force becomes one-quarter as strong. Newton's formula for the gravitational force (\(F\)) between two objects is:\(F=G\frac{m_{1}m_{2}}{r^{2}}\)Where: \(G\) is the gravitational constant.\(m_{1}\) and \(m_{2}\) are the masses of the two objects.\(r\) is the distance between the centers of the two masses. Einstein's general relativity (Gravity as curved spacetime) Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity reframed our understanding of gravity, moving beyond Newton's description of it as a mysterious "action at a distance". Gravity is the curvature of spacetime: According to this theory, mass and energy cause spacetime to curve. We experience the effects of this curvature as gravity.A "bowling ball on a trampoline" analogy: A common analogy is a bowling ball sitting on a stretched-out trampoline.The flat, unstretched trampoline represents empty, "flat" spacetime.The bowling ball, a massive object, creates a curved dimple in the trampoline sheet.If you roll a marble nearby, it will follow the curvature created by the bowling ball and roll toward it, not because it is being "pulled," but because it is following the most direct path along the curved surface. "Mass differentials" and gravitational anomalies While gravity doesn't arise from a difference in mass, you might be thinking of local gravitational variations, sometimes called "gravity anomalies". The Earth's gravitational pull is not perfectly uniform across its surface.Slight variations in the density of material beneath the surface—for example, a dense mountain range versus a deep ocean trench—can be measured with sensitive instruments.In this context, the difference in the amount of mass in a given volume (its density) does cause a slight difference in the gravitational pull at that location.
However, this is not the fundamental cause of gravity itself. The baseline force of gravity comes from the total mass of the object, like Earth, and the idea of "mass differential gravity" is more relevant to measuring small, localized variations in a larger gravitational field.
\\][//
This reminds me of the guy a couple of years back, trying to see if the Earth is really round instead of a flat planet. He was smart enough to make a rocket device that launched him very high, except the parachute landing system was not as advanced and failed. I wonder what his last thoughts were?
Hah! Phil I have debated many 'Flat Earthers" it is astonishing how many beliive this bullshit! Communication satellites are what makes it possible to link to the Internet. Just that fact alone destroys all their goofy arguments.
\\][//
They call "Satellites" , " Satt-a-loons"( high altitude balloons; space is fake too),.so don't expect them to admit it..🙄
Thank you. I just looked it up on line. Your definition is much better.
I don't come in contact to anyone that gaslights me except the media.
That's always the way with gaslighting - you don't know it's being done if it's done subtly!
Wm. Casey was an ex-director of the CIA, and he is known for having said, "When everything the American people believe is false, then our job will be done."
So there's a lot of gaslighting that's been sent your way during your lifetime.
But gravity is not one of them.
Alas, it's not democrat vs republican, we are all one people, and those are two wings of the same captured government vulture terrorizing us and picking us clean. There are only liberal vs independent vs conservative values. Here is those liberal values in action (they are victims who've been lead down into a very black dungeon - they've been brainwashed by advanced political psychological warfare and manipulation - and we've got to find a way to get them back to reality or we will all be divided and conquered without them firing a shot - we will end up shooting one another for them):
Here is an impassioned blistering plea about democrat compassion from a legal immigrant:
Not long after I came to America, I was exposed to the narrative that the Democrat Party was the party of the little guy and the only party with genuine care and compassion for the average American. Fortunately, because I grew up under a dictatorship, I could not be easily fooled by socioeconomic shackles masquerading as compassionate public policy. The truth is there is no compassion like Democrat compassion. It is the kind of compassion that lets people shoot illicit drugs into their body with the government's assistance. It is the kind of compassion that sees assisted suicide as a moral virtue. Democrat compassion is the kind of compassion that lets you rob the innocent in hardworking businesses in your neighborhood and walk out with impunity with no fear of prosecution.
Democrat compassion is the kind of compassion that tells vulnerable women it is their right to abort and sacrifice their unborn children on the perverted altar of female empowerment and convenience. Democrat compassion is the kind of compassion that tells children they were born in the wrong body and encourages and subsidizes their mutilation. Democrat compassion is the kind of compassion that lets boys unfairly compete against girls and take their records, their opportunities, and their scholarships, and invade their private spaces turning back decades of hard-fought gains. https://old.bitchute.com/video/km6W0evMlQQ5 [4:37mins]
Here are solution to bring us back together because if we don't do this we will all perish like fools: https://tritorch.substack.com/p/united-we-stand-divided-we-fall
A friend calls the uniparty DeRP.
Sabina Speilrein "I must admit that I greatly fear that my friend [Jung], who planned to mention my idea (of archetypes in our collective unconscious, about death-rebirth) in his article in July, saying that I have rights of priority, may simply borrow the whole development of the idea, because he now wants to refer to it as early as January. … How could I esteem a person who stole my ideas, who was not my friend but a petty, scheming rival?" Jung was a serial cheater who forced his family to include his mistress into their home. Emma, Jung's wife was wealthy and refined, Jung was uncouth, if she divorced him, he could choose to leave her without any of her assets that she brought to the marriage. We need to have a balanced view on patriarchy; its aspects of bravery, innovation, cruelty and how it can manifest in destructive subjugation of others. Fortunately, times have changed and will continue to do so.
This observation is explained by the saying, "The exception proves the rule," as Jung and his kind are by no means to be conflated with the majority of men, who, morality aside, have done, and continue to do, all the things the OP mentioned.
One wonders why his wife, if "wealthy and refined," chose to cohabit with a man so obviously her moral inferior, although wealth and refinement are not generally thought to exclude the possibility of infidelity, and/or uncouthness in private.
Perhaps she was driven by her emotions, not by her logic, which is the besetting sin of most women.
But I have major reservations about your statement, "The times have changed."
They are very much what they have always been, and will continue to be.
People married young back then, it was the culture, it takes a long time to get to know someone. Unfortunately, pornography is so rampant today that I am compelled to disagree with your opinion on the sexual morality of the majority. I wish the ideal was true, but it is not.
Your first point is a good one.
But sexual morality is as under strain amongst women as it is amongst men, so it would be wrong to blame "the patriarchy" for this situation - females have embraced the new normal enthusiastically, as with the OnlyFans phenomenon.
I was putting sexual morality under the umbrella for both genders if you refer back to my comment, majority points to the word 'people' not simply men. You missed my point in my first comment on patriarchy. The 'patriarchal system' at that time, held that if Emma for sound reasons divorced her husband, she would lose control of her own money. That is in the past though, society has moved on, and it will change again as industry and economy drive cultural norms, and we are now entering the age of robotics and AI.
You started off by decrying Jung's sexual immorality, and contrasted it with his wife's "wealth and refinement," so no obvious acknowledgement of the sexual immorality of both sexes, which you are now attesting to.
The first usage of the word "majority" was from me, and referred to men exclusively, so when you use the word later, the average reader would assume that you too are referring to men only, especially as you never used the word "people", as you are now stating, but rather, "someone, " by which again the average reader would assume you are using the pronoun to refer to Jung.
Now the patriarchal system at the time definitely favoured men, as women were thought to be too "hysterical" to order their own affairs ( the word refers to the female womb, which was thought, rightly or wrongly, to be the seat of their emotions ) but it would be reasonable to ask if that possibly unfair system has now inadvertently brought about the "No Fault Divorce" situation, whereby a woman, for no obvious reason whatsoever, maybe just "incompatibility," can divorce her husband, take at least half of his property, together with a substantial yearly sum in maintenance whether for her alone, or for her and any children which it might be hoped survive this destruction of the family - so has a more matriarchal system delivered the utopian world that women had agitated for ever since they were first exposed to the destabilizing and destructive influence of those first feminists, all of whom seem to have similar-sounding and ethnically-related surnames?
So society may have "moved on," but what has it left behind in the dust - things which in retrospect, we probably would not have wished it to?
And given that divorces today ( but obviously, for the reasons you gave, not in the past ) are generally initiated by the female partner, with all the implications for the children, is it not at least strongly arguable that we ought never to have abandoned those principles which we had in the past?
In other words, maybe the tried-and-tested patriarchal model is the one we should have stuck to.
The only constant is change.
❤️❤️❤️this!
Excellent Work..!
Anyone who thinks its the Democrats, or the Republicans, needs to hurry up and take the red pill. There is NO 2-party political system running America, there is only one party controlling America, and every other country on the planet. The llluminati, the 13 bloodlines that secretly run the World.
Take the red pill.
I have, in the past, always been in agreement with your commentary. I do take some offense in your ending statement about thanking the “patriarchy” the next time I need a plumber, etc. Having spent 25 years as a professional “handyma’am”, building bookcases, changing/repairing plumbing and electrical fixtures, hanging wallpaper, and repairing drywall, etc. I have rarely called on “the patriarchy” to fix anything and that includes my husband, who has other talents that do not include typical “manly” pursuits. Please do better. I know several other women who are way more handy than their male partners.
was TriTorch talking about 0% vs 100% . . . or was he talking about relative percentages (somewhere between 0%-100%) where the actual numbers depend on the specifics being discussed?
In their eyes, no doubt.
Their husbands just allow them to think it, so they can watch the game instead of putting up shelves, or whatever the latest thing is that she wants done.
I am by no means denigrating men or their incontrovertible contribution to family and the development of this country. Everyone has a responsibility to use their talents in ways that benefit themselves, their families and this nation. You, on the other hand, are denigrating women as being incapable of handling pursuits usually taken on by men and accusing them of being mere harpies who constantly harass men to do things for them.
Sometimes, the truth has to be told.
But I don't think I ever said that women were incapable of doing these things; rather, that the majority have no talent for them.
As for them constantly harassing men to do things for them, the thing seems to be that they always want what they can't have, so they see this as a challenge, ie to harass the man until they get as many things as they can have, before moving on to the next thing they can't have.
It's a kind of madness that women, whether singly or en masse, are all too prone to.
Generalizations will always get you into trouble. All I can say is that I have never been, nor will I ever be one of those women.
my Wife is pretty good at putting stuff together, better than I am. You have said your piece well and with grace. I salute you.
Love love love this and planning to share share share it
I actually just shared it with full credit on Unreported Truths (Alex Berenson's substack) because that community would really love it (hope Alex isn't offended but my guess is he will enjoy it)
Wheres Mitch McConnell
Arrest Bill Barr for treason
This is fabulous! But I am devil-sceptic. I don't think they will be able to cease this kind of verbal littering. They have little if any self-control. Gavin may be able to do it, in his desperation to appear to be a normal person, but his hands will continue to gesticulate madly. However, academia, the media and the freaks on the street will continue with the nonsense. It is as if they all have Tourette syndrome.
Excellent! Thank you!
What a minute...did A/i okay all this?
True. The Far Right needs one too!
So Venozio, Just what the fuck do you mean by the "Far Right"?
They are the very ones that oppose these neo-Marxist maniacs that this article is berating.
Are YOU one of them? Are you a demented Democrat?!?!?
\\][//
WW, No need to use the F-word here, you are demonstrating who you are - unhinged.
Never voted or was a Democrat. I want what is best for America and the American people, not the 1% Psychopaths. Dictator Trump and his Fascist Cabal is Far Right.
"Dictator Trump and his Fascist Cabal is Far Right."~Alberto Venezio, who hasn't the personal honor to capitalize his own name.
The term "fuck" is in common use in the English speaking world today ever since the George Carlin's skit; "Seven Dirty Words". "Fuck" is commonly used in modern movies. So using the term "fuck" harldly means that someone is unhinged.
So as I postulated you were indeed specking about Trump and his supporters . Now calling him a "dictator" and his supporters a "Fascist Cabal of the Far Right.
Now that sir is truly unhinged.
Trump and his supporters are U.S Nationalists. He and we support the US Constitution and admire the beautiful eloquence of the Declaration of Independence.
We grasp that our inalienable rights to Liberty are not granted by government but by the Creator. We have been opposed to all the bullshit this article speaks to; the Neo-Marxist LGBTQ nonsense, Diversity Equity Inclusion (DEI), the absurdity that men can become pregnant, that there is no distinction between the 2 genders. That so-called "trans athletes" should be allowed to patricipate in women's sports.
You disingenuously claim that you are not a Democrat...you obviously did not vote for Trump, so you either voted for that cackling bitch Kamala, or you didn't vote. Your intencity in this forum suggests that you are lying that you did in fact vote for the Democrat nominee.
There is much in you that demonstrates your disingenuous rhetorical sophistry and lack of candor.
It would be wise of you to not challenge me again with your obvious bullshit. It is not going well for you whether you realize it or not.
\\][//
You need help. I never voted Republican or Democrat in over 4 decades, I only ever voted for Perot to avoid the Clinton/Bush I gutting of the US manufacturing industry and involvement in Foreign Wars. You are fooled by the Uniparty and you spout BS!
I have no fear of you, Trump or anyone else and you are a Coward to Threaten online. You dish it out by the truck load but can't take any kind of a pushback - because your entire ideology is a house of cards as is your boy Trump the Traitor.
Hey Venesio,
I have not threatened you in anyway whatsoever you fucking fool!
There is no "Uniparty" The Trump conservative are as different from the Marxist Democrats as day and night, as up and down, as right and wrong.
The "Uniparty" is a meme invented by the leftist Democrats to hide behind, which is exactly what you are doing on this thread here and now.
If you are afraid of my language don't provoke me with any more of your delusional bullshit.
\\][//
Far Left is Communism and Far Right is Fascism and they do the same awful things to the people. Did you not see a Clown Like Biden drive voters to a Clown like Trump. Go back in your basement.
Your boy Traitor Trump pushed the Bioweapon Jabs on us too!
Here were your words Coward:
"It would be wise of you to not challenge me again with your obvious bullshit. It is not going well for you whether you realize it or not."