Thanks for showing this video!! It is strange that from the moment Charlie grasps the microphone with both hands and even shortly before that, all the way to the moment of the shot, he CLOSES HIS BOTH EYES..., thus this crazy thought, as if he waited for something... VERY STRANGE!
From the first moment of the guy with dark glasses on the left, jumping on Charlie and the following surrounding other guys doing the same, it appears as if they hide everything what happened afterwards... So similar to Butler's 'incident'...
There were USED gloves in the door pocket in the van Charlie was transported away from scene, which were not there before he was transported to the event. The fact that the entire scenery was REPAVED the following weekend kind of indicates that ALL RESIDUES from the used explosive had to be removed. It was clear to me that the 'SECURITY' TEAM guides this entire murder. That's why Harpole sues Candace right now...
Yes! One of the things I noticed pretty quickly, was that it appeared to me that Charlie was preparing himself by closing his eyes, and making his posture slightly rigid. Some videos show this better than others, especially when enlarged. I didn't know about the used gloves in the door pocket.
I think that it's possible that Charlies audio recording device triggered a squib. Perhaps a hologram was involved, Robinson is a patsy, there was no crime scene, the court case is a sham, and other stuff that I mentioned in another reply. I'm thinking that CHARLIE KIRK isn't dead. I'm very hopeful of that. His positions regarding the Epstein files, and Israel were maybe too hot to handle, so he was put into protection. I do think that Charlie was likely pursued by the CIA when he was in college, and young and very passionate about some of his positions. He may have begun to question some of his initial political, relationship/social, and religious positions.
Baron Coleman on the Real Baron Podcast has also been investigating this case. He has similar thoughts as Mr. Leake. It is so informative and entertaining! I highly recommend it!
I believe, after following for months the numerous people analyzing and investigating Charlie's assassination, that whatever device exploded under Charlie's shirt, it failed to perform in the way they expected. I think the explosion was intended to pierce directly into the center of Charlie's chest, causing profuse bleeding, which would then make it appear that he'd been shot in the chest by the 30.06 rifle. Instead, the shaped charge (if that's what it was), didn't explode the way they intended, and created a neck wound (which they found difficult to explain afterward).
Charlie, I was told, typically wore black shirts to these campus events. At UVU, he was suddenly wearing a custom white Carhartt one they had made for him; in my thinking, that was to more fully display the expected "massive 30.06 rifle wound" and its profuse resultant bleeding.
If you know all the facts, it should be obvious to anyone with half a brain that it was an exploding device that killed Charlie, not a bullet. Baron Coleman, Candice Owens, and many others searching for the truth have gathered and shown loads of evidence that proves this. You need to catch up to their uncovered facts. Israel wanted him dead, and his new israeli security team were the ones who placed the exploding device disguised as a microphone on him. I was preparing to go over all lies from the investigation but don't have an hour to give. Just watch shows 32 thru 36 of The Real Matrix Show on Rumble.com. Link provided Rumble.com/c/c-7844818
George Webb is an essential investigator on this and several other major areas of massive import, as well. Despite his recent passion for making AI "music video" to convey his content ,of which I'm not a particualr fan. (My ears are allergic to AI music, and I like my analyses delivered, i.e., received, in the trqaditional oral and written format--but that's just me. You can still access George's excellent reporting despite his penchant for the AI music vids) If your missing out on GW, your missing a lot.
It wasn't overwhelming. It included Lance Twiggs not being 100% sure that was Tyler on video, the bullet fragments not matching the gun, the police body cam "battery dying" just before he found the critical roof screwdriver even though he had just started his shift (and he never mentioned the screwdriver in radio coms), the would-be shooter forgetting which pantsleg was supposed to have the rifle barrel in it and inadvertently bending both legs on video; video having inexplicably missing minutes without explanation; and "Tyler" being seen on video wearing no less than 6 different outfits. If they didn't have Lance claiming he confessed in person to him, I'm not sure this would even go to trial.
A semester on a college campus will teach that it is virtually IMPOSSIBLE for Tyler’s grandad’s antique 30.06 did this damage?
ANYONE with cursory knowledge of firearms knows with certainty that Tyler’s weapon is not the murder weapon.
And anyone with an IQ greater than 80 who doesn’t know the difference between a palm gun and a rifle could be shown in few minutes that Tyler didn’t take the shot.
I have a master’s in math from a prestigious university and experience as a teacher.
You don’t need ONE DAY in college, much less a semester to know the purported murder weapon does not match the accusation.
Nice try on sending an innocent patsy to his death.
PS A person doesn’t need a day of university to know it is indecent to scapegoat an innocent young man.
What is your sorry excuse for being so cruel? Not enough university instruction in human decency?
Wasn't aimed at me, but didn't seem personal. Your belief in the mountain of evidence is shared and promoted largely by people connected to TP/USA, the U.S. government, and/or Israel. But for those without any special interest in the case, the more you look at the evidence, the more holes you see (though not a rifle). Claims by influencers that Erika invited to the last session of the prelim that they could see Robinson pull the trigger are laughably false. The video quality (wide angle lens, 150 yards away) is so bad that you can't even see a weapon. One former Green Beret says he knows a hundred or more former and current operators and no more than 1% believe the official story. Robert O'Neill, the SEAL widely credited with killing Bin Laden, says he's shot many men at close range, has never seen anything like the movement of Kirk's shirt or his rectangular entry wound, and doesn't believe the official story. A good non-emotional source on the case is the Baron Coleman Podcast. He's a 150-plus episodes in, but just did a 3.5-hour interview with Julian Dorey that might be a good summary of what he's covered (I'll probably watch it this evening). It's at:
Jason Goodman also showed video with two frames showing a bullet approaching Charlie’s neck from behind, while someone else showed video of the back window of the closest vehicle, a van, raising open while the “shot” was heard, while another video shows the silhouette of a man inside holding a rifle with a suppression device. I have seen photos of splinters of black glass and black plastic claimed to be on the carpet of the SUV that transported Charlie to the hospital. If you don’t accept that there were multiple people there involved, you are either ignorant and naive, or involved in the obvious cover-up. I could go on with what John Cullen has presented and Stew Peters, too.
Lee Harvey Oswald did not kill anyone, but at least 3 mafia hitmen did and there were a lot more there ready as well.
Please stop spreading rumors and conspiracy theories. You have no knowledge and these ideas are malicious and incredibly damaging. There is no real or credible evidence of this supposition or any of the ideas you are spreading.
I watched most of the pre trial hearing a few weeks ago. Most of you appearantly did not and persist with delusional and uninformed theories. Or apparently you are getting your information only from people like Candace or influenced by Candace.
Having watched, perhaps you could share the evidence that convinces you of the government case.
One highlight for me was the door cam that caught what was supposedly Robinson's Dodge (no license plate or Flock report) around midnight on 9/10, supposedly as he tried to retrieve the rifle. Under cross, SBI lead investigator Hull was forced to admit that the owner of the door cam reported the Dodge was driven by a bald man and carried three passengers. When the defense attorney asked Hull if he'd mentioned that in his testimony, Hull's said crisply in his English(?) accent, "I did not." In other words, the lead investigator in this huge case admitted lying by omission.
exactly the point, since there are no answers to these and many other questions you are left to speculate with what makes sense. If our law enforcement agencies were truly transparent you wouldn't have to worry.
The "Jesse on fire" podcast has been asking these questions and many more since right after Charlie Kirk's murder. Like you, he doesn't come to conclusions but he tries to look from every different angle and deeply dissect possibilities. He employs many videos in slow motion or stopped motion and charts and you might want to look at some of his podcasts . The world lost such a great man. One of the few who truly believed in dialogue and love to solve problems.
Any theory is better than a 30.06 round.
agreed
The most technical and extensive analysis of the Rode mic killing Charlie is found here. https://followtheepicenter.com/ Quite convincing.
Convinced
Thanks for showing this video!! It is strange that from the moment Charlie grasps the microphone with both hands and even shortly before that, all the way to the moment of the shot, he CLOSES HIS BOTH EYES..., thus this crazy thought, as if he waited for something... VERY STRANGE!
From the first moment of the guy with dark glasses on the left, jumping on Charlie and the following surrounding other guys doing the same, it appears as if they hide everything what happened afterwards... So similar to Butler's 'incident'...
There were USED gloves in the door pocket in the van Charlie was transported away from scene, which were not there before he was transported to the event. The fact that the entire scenery was REPAVED the following weekend kind of indicates that ALL RESIDUES from the used explosive had to be removed. It was clear to me that the 'SECURITY' TEAM guides this entire murder. That's why Harpole sues Candace right now...
Yes! One of the things I noticed pretty quickly, was that it appeared to me that Charlie was preparing himself by closing his eyes, and making his posture slightly rigid. Some videos show this better than others, especially when enlarged. I didn't know about the used gloves in the door pocket.
I think that it's possible that Charlies audio recording device triggered a squib. Perhaps a hologram was involved, Robinson is a patsy, there was no crime scene, the court case is a sham, and other stuff that I mentioned in another reply. I'm thinking that CHARLIE KIRK isn't dead. I'm very hopeful of that. His positions regarding the Epstein files, and Israel were maybe too hot to handle, so he was put into protection. I do think that Charlie was likely pursued by the CIA when he was in college, and young and very passionate about some of his positions. He may have begun to question some of his initial political, relationship/social, and religious positions.
Baron Coleman on the Real Baron Podcast has also been investigating this case. He has similar thoughts as Mr. Leake. It is so informative and entertaining! I highly recommend it!
I believe, after following for months the numerous people analyzing and investigating Charlie's assassination, that whatever device exploded under Charlie's shirt, it failed to perform in the way they expected. I think the explosion was intended to pierce directly into the center of Charlie's chest, causing profuse bleeding, which would then make it appear that he'd been shot in the chest by the 30.06 rifle. Instead, the shaped charge (if that's what it was), didn't explode the way they intended, and created a neck wound (which they found difficult to explain afterward).
Charlie, I was told, typically wore black shirts to these campus events. At UVU, he was suddenly wearing a custom white Carhartt one they had made for him; in my thinking, that was to more fully display the expected "massive 30.06 rifle wound" and its profuse resultant bleeding.
does Peter McCollough agree with posting this level of conspiracy thinking? Gee, I thought he was more grounded than this.
Do you perceive Dr. McCullough to be a man who blindly accepts the assurances of government agencies?
insults? Really bot breath?
Did you bother to review the information?
If you know all the facts, it should be obvious to anyone with half a brain that it was an exploding device that killed Charlie, not a bullet. Baron Coleman, Candice Owens, and many others searching for the truth have gathered and shown loads of evidence that proves this. You need to catch up to their uncovered facts. Israel wanted him dead, and his new israeli security team were the ones who placed the exploding device disguised as a microphone on him. I was preparing to go over all lies from the investigation but don't have an hour to give. Just watch shows 32 thru 36 of The Real Matrix Show on Rumble.com. Link provided Rumble.com/c/c-7844818
George Webb is an essential investigator on this and several other major areas of massive import, as well. Despite his recent passion for making AI "music video" to convey his content ,of which I'm not a particualr fan. (My ears are allergic to AI music, and I like my analyses delivered, i.e., received, in the trqaditional oral and written format--but that's just me. You can still access George's excellent reporting despite his penchant for the AI music vids) If your missing out on GW, your missing a lot.
Evidence at pretrial is overwhelming.....yet those promoting conspiracies STILL ABOUND.
GO spend a semester on a college campus!!!!!!!!!
FULL STOP.
It wasn't overwhelming. It included Lance Twiggs not being 100% sure that was Tyler on video, the bullet fragments not matching the gun, the police body cam "battery dying" just before he found the critical roof screwdriver even though he had just started his shift (and he never mentioned the screwdriver in radio coms), the would-be shooter forgetting which pantsleg was supposed to have the rifle barrel in it and inadvertently bending both legs on video; video having inexplicably missing minutes without explanation; and "Tyler" being seen on video wearing no less than 6 different outfits. If they didn't have Lance claiming he confessed in person to him, I'm not sure this would even go to trial.
The evidence has a HUGE hole in it...no identifiable bullet or bullet fragments.
"Faith, Hope, Life" change your user name to 'full blindness and death' or maybe better 'brainless hope'
A semester on a college campus will teach that it is virtually IMPOSSIBLE for Tyler’s grandad’s antique 30.06 did this damage?
ANYONE with cursory knowledge of firearms knows with certainty that Tyler’s weapon is not the murder weapon.
And anyone with an IQ greater than 80 who doesn’t know the difference between a palm gun and a rifle could be shown in few minutes that Tyler didn’t take the shot.
I have a master’s in math from a prestigious university and experience as a teacher.
You don’t need ONE DAY in college, much less a semester to know the purported murder weapon does not match the accusation.
Nice try on sending an innocent patsy to his death.
PS A person doesn’t need a day of university to know it is indecent to scapegoat an innocent young man.
What is your sorry excuse for being so cruel? Not enough university instruction in human decency?
Exit wound. ???? FULL STOP
I assume you are not an attorney, or you would understand evidence better.
🤣🤣
That wasn’t meant to be personal.
Sorry.
Wasn't aimed at me, but didn't seem personal. Your belief in the mountain of evidence is shared and promoted largely by people connected to TP/USA, the U.S. government, and/or Israel. But for those without any special interest in the case, the more you look at the evidence, the more holes you see (though not a rifle). Claims by influencers that Erika invited to the last session of the prelim that they could see Robinson pull the trigger are laughably false. The video quality (wide angle lens, 150 yards away) is so bad that you can't even see a weapon. One former Green Beret says he knows a hundred or more former and current operators and no more than 1% believe the official story. Robert O'Neill, the SEAL widely credited with killing Bin Laden, says he's shot many men at close range, has never seen anything like the movement of Kirk's shirt or his rectangular entry wound, and doesn't believe the official story. A good non-emotional source on the case is the Baron Coleman Podcast. He's a 150-plus episodes in, but just did a 3.5-hour interview with Julian Dorey that might be a good summary of what he's covered (I'll probably watch it this evening). It's at:
https://www.youtube.com/@realbaronpodcast
Mine wasn't either.
Excellent and sturdy analysis.
The most important aspect of Charlie Kirk’s assassination is that it was Israel.
Every conversation should include this otherwise we are simply distracting people from the most important aspect of the truth.
Jason Goodman also showed video with two frames showing a bullet approaching Charlie’s neck from behind, while someone else showed video of the back window of the closest vehicle, a van, raising open while the “shot” was heard, while another video shows the silhouette of a man inside holding a rifle with a suppression device. I have seen photos of splinters of black glass and black plastic claimed to be on the carpet of the SUV that transported Charlie to the hospital. If you don’t accept that there were multiple people there involved, you are either ignorant and naive, or involved in the obvious cover-up. I could go on with what John Cullen has presented and Stew Peters, too.
Lee Harvey Oswald did not kill anyone, but at least 3 mafia hitmen did and there were a lot more there ready as well.
The most important thing is to call their current charges around Tyler Robinson what it is.
Absurd.
Please stop spreading rumors and conspiracy theories. You have no knowledge and these ideas are malicious and incredibly damaging. There is no real or credible evidence of this supposition or any of the ideas you are spreading.
And you know this how? Maybe link to a source?
I watched most of the pre trial hearing a few weeks ago. Most of you appearantly did not and persist with delusional and uninformed theories. Or apparently you are getting your information only from people like Candace or influenced by Candace.
Having watched, perhaps you could share the evidence that convinces you of the government case.
One highlight for me was the door cam that caught what was supposedly Robinson's Dodge (no license plate or Flock report) around midnight on 9/10, supposedly as he tried to retrieve the rifle. Under cross, SBI lead investigator Hull was forced to admit that the owner of the door cam reported the Dodge was driven by a bald man and carried three passengers. When the defense attorney asked Hull if he'd mentioned that in his testimony, Hull's said crisply in his English(?) accent, "I did not." In other words, the lead investigator in this huge case admitted lying by omission.
exactly the point, since there are no answers to these and many other questions you are left to speculate with what makes sense. If our law enforcement agencies were truly transparent you wouldn't have to worry.
I appreciate your courage and honesty in covering this.
Do prosecutors tend to answer questions truthfully?
Prosecutors are lawyers, and lawyers are liars.
The "Jesse on fire" podcast has been asking these questions and many more since right after Charlie Kirk's murder. Like you, he doesn't come to conclusions but he tries to look from every different angle and deeply dissect possibilities. He employs many videos in slow motion or stopped motion and charts and you might want to look at some of his podcasts . The world lost such a great man. One of the few who truly believed in dialogue and love to solve problems.