Bulleyes! One bullet hit the jugular right on. That means it was close up and executed well. Only fragments means the bullet was designed to fragment. Nothing was left to chance.
Did CK see his killer the seconds before he was shot? I think so. A glimmer of recognition and he raised the mike in an attempt to protect himself. My reaction. Rifle..no way. Drone or one shot pistol palmed. Expert marksman.
The website is super. Jon Bray's newest interview with Stew Peters is a great way to get a detailed but digestible summary of what Jon displays in detail at his website. https://rumble.com/v7doije-destroyed-jon-bray-dismantles-the-official-kirk-autopsy-report.html What John Leake can learn from the interview is: Charlie was dead instantly, so the further questions about treatment etc do not apply. The neck wound is clearly explained by Jon Bray.
Totally brilliant, the truth at last. its like JFK 1963 again, I hope this is not making you a target for the CIA, they usually silence the truth, like they did with JFK witness's, people disappeared and were found in the trunks of cars, buried in the desert.
Thanks for showing this video!! It is strange that from the moment Charlie grasps the microphone with both hands and even shortly before that, all the way to the moment of the shot, he CLOSES HIS BOTH EYES..., thus this crazy thought, as if he waited for something... VERY STRANGE!
From the first moment of the guy with dark glasses on the left, jumping on Charlie and the following surrounding other guys doing the same, it appears as if they hide everything what happened afterwards... So similar to Butler's 'incident'...
There were USED gloves in the door pocket in the van Charlie was transported away from scene, which were not there before he was transported to the event. The fact that the entire scenery was REPAVED the following weekend kind of indicates that ALL RESIDUES from the used explosive had to be removed. It was clear to me that the 'SECURITY' TEAM guides this entire murder. That's why Harpole sues Candace right now...
Yes! One of the things I noticed pretty quickly, was that it appeared to me that Charlie was preparing himself by closing his eyes, and making his posture slightly rigid. Some videos show this better than others, especially when enlarged. I didn't know about the used gloves in the door pocket.
I think that it's possible that Charlies audio recording device triggered a squib. Perhaps a hologram was involved, Robinson is a patsy, there was no crime scene, the court case is a sham, and other stuff that I mentioned in another reply. I'm thinking that CHARLIE KIRK isn't dead. I'm very hopeful of that. His positions regarding the Epstein files, and Israel were maybe too hot to handle, so he was put into protection. I do think that Charlie was likely pursued by the CIA when he was in college, and young and very passionate about some of his positions. He may have begun to question some of his initial political, relationship/social, and religious positions.
Right, and he is putting his wife and two children through hell for, what, exactly? The “patsy” was first ID’d by his own parents, confessed to his boyfriend and their friends in their chat room thing, his DNA is on the roof etc etc. Why would he do that? Have any of you seen the actual evidence? Read the autopsy report? All this speculation does nothing but taint the jury pool.
Well, I was told that I was a stupid nutcase for believing that the covid shots were dangerous, and that I was to be avoided, because I wasn't "vaccinated". I stuck to my guns, refusing to get genetic material injected, which ends up inserting itself into our DNA. And now Fauchi is appearing before congress, and information is readily available in terms of cardiovascular, miscarriage, and neurological problems related to the shots. My brother died after his second covid shot. I'm a retired RN, and covid was a very uncomfortable wake up call for me.
Since then, I've become aware that wars exist to rich men get richer, and to cause distraction for the the real stuff going on behind the scenes. People disappear (scientists- there's a lot of info on this). Food manufacturers lie and cheat in terms of what is being inserted into our food, farmland is being purchased, seeds are patented, and huge "data" centers are being built all over the world. What happened to climate change? The water and electric use by these behemoth structures will be astronomical. Flock cameras are an additional surveillance tool. So, getting back to Charlie Kirk- I've worked ICU and ER's. The large caliber bullet wounds that I've seen did not respond like Charlie Kirk's did. No medical help was allowed, and he was put in a private car, and the scene was quickly cleaned up. I believe that his life was in danger, and he chose to live. If I thought my life was in danger, I would likely say and do lots of stuff that I normally would not. The world is a psyop, and I'm finally just seeing it for what it really is. I choose to question everything, and to live in reality. I lived in enough unreality white being parented by a covert narcissist mother.
But what would he have been preparing himself for by closing his eyes and posture rigid? It is not like he was suiciding himself or knew what was going to happen unless you are thinking this was a show, he is alive and he knew the time when he put his hands down that it was about to happen???
I think this was a psyop. We live in a world run by psychopaths and I feel that so much history that I learned and thought was truthful, was not. This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong, but I think that Charlie knew that he would be killed if he didn't cooperate. I think he was mentally preparing himself for a squib to be "zapped". He did NOT go rigid enough after the "hit", and his legs should have gone straight .Instead his knees went inward. I've seen decorticate posturing and it does not resemble Charlie's response. I don't think that Charlie evolved into exactly who we think he was/is, but I had the utmost respect for him. I think he realized that he could no longer navigate what our world has become.
I respectfully do not think this was a psyop. Did you see Craig's comment above and the link he provided. Very informative and convincing. You may want to take a look-30 minutes long and takes you step by step. Worth the 30 minutes. I do not believe he would have given up and left his kids not being able to navigate. He had the strength from God in him.
Craigs comment and link below.
The most technical and extensive analysis of the Rode mic killing Charlie is found here. https://followtheepicenter.com/ Quite convincing.
Lori, how is it not a psyop if the 30.06 gun did not kill him? I think it's entirely possible that a cartridge actuated device (or an explosive squib) was used, and this was what could have caused the gas seen under Charlie's shirt. Do you think it's safe if I download the epicenter video?
A 30-06 bullet has a minimum of 2500 ft lbs of energy at that range. A punch from a young Mike Tyson would hit the body with 800-900 ft lbs of energy. The impact of the bullet would have made him wince and close his eyes.
I believe, after following for months the numerous people analyzing and investigating Charlie's assassination, that whatever device exploded under Charlie's shirt, it failed to perform in the way they expected. I think the explosion was intended to pierce directly into the center of Charlie's chest, causing profuse bleeding, which would then make it appear that he'd been shot in the chest by the 30.06 rifle. Instead, the shaped charge (if that's what it was), didn't explode the way they intended, and created a neck wound (which they found difficult to explain afterward).
Charlie, I was told, typically wore black shirts to these campus events. At UVU, he was suddenly wearing a custom white Carhartt one they had made for him; in my thinking, that was to more fully display the expected "massive 30.06 rifle wound" and its profuse resultant bleeding.
unfortunately this particular thread does not allow us to post photos or I would show you the screenshots from the conversations, but those are all over the Internet so you’ll have to find them yourself, but #Charliekirk said that he thought Israel was going to assassinate him for turning against them, and No Longer taking their bribe money
For those allergic to the "Israel involvement" narrative, keep in mind it refers to a "rogue element" of said entity, no matter how large, major, and powerful said rogue element may be. Just as in the JFK murder/coup d'etat. In other words, a considerable portion of the population/citizenry at large are innocent and effectively victims or captives when such "rogue" elements take "executive action".
Baron Coleman on the Real Baron Podcast has also been investigating this case. He has similar thoughts as Mr. Leake. It is so informative and entertaining! I highly recommend it!
maybe you should ask him yourself since you are on his staff. I think persuing things like this is an exercise in futility and looking for evil in the wrong place when it has clearly presented itself.
Um, he was one of the few early doctors to question the whole covid narrative. If I want to get to the "truth of the matter", give me a conspiracy theorist any day. I followed Dr. McCullough, Dr. Jessica Rose, Dr. John Campbell (it took John awhile, but he eventually accepted that the covid narrative was false). Also, Dr. Mike Yeadon, and doctors who signed the Great Barrington declaration. As a retired nurse, my world was quite shaken by what I had believed to be true. Now, I no longer believe much of what I see and read.
Nah, he even believes in viruses, but in regsrds to the fake killing, I partixularly like the 1970’s bigfoot photi of the perp, on a modern day college campus with modern day 4k security cams.
It wasn't overwhelming. It included Lance Twiggs not being 100% sure that was Tyler on video, the bullet fragments not matching the gun, the police body cam "battery dying" just before he found the critical roof screwdriver even though he had just started his shift (and he never mentioned the screwdriver in radio coms), the would-be shooter forgetting which pantsleg was supposed to have the rifle barrel in it and inadvertently bending both legs on video; video having inexplicably missing minutes without explanation; and "Tyler" being seen on video wearing no less than 6 different outfits. If they didn't have Lance claiming he confessed in person to him, I'm not sure this would even go to trial.
The screwdriver that was "found" is not the type required to disassemble the "murder weapon" according to James McNeil of Seal Team 6 who took out Bin Laden.
I can’t understand you. Do you really think that a university education will help a person understand the ballistics of a 30.06??!! It is virtually IMPOSSIBLE for Tyler’s grandad’s antique 30.06 to do damage that we see.
ANYONE with cursory knowledge of firearms knows with certainty that Tyler’s weapon is not the murder weapon.
And anyone with an IQ greater than 80 who doesn’t know the difference between a palm gun and a rifle could be shown in few minutes that Tyler weapon didn’t make the kill shot.
I have a master’s in math from a prestigious university and experience as a teacher.
You don’t need ONE DAY in college, much less a semester to know the purported murder weapon does not match up the accusation.
Nice try on sending an innocent patsy to his death.
PS A person doesn’t need a day of university to know it is indecent to scapegoat an innocent young man.
What is your sorry excuse for being so cruel? Not enough university instruction in human decency?
Nobody special - just an typical juror………… who actually listened to the evidence produced in the court room and review by firearms and law enforcement who understood guns and bullets very well. Your worst nightmare I guess. Have a great day!
Wasn't aimed at me, but didn't seem personal. Your belief in the mountain of evidence is shared and promoted largely by people connected to TP/USA, the U.S. government, and/or Israel. But for those without any special interest in the case, the more you look at the evidence, the more holes you see (though not a rifle). Claims by influencers that Erika invited to the last session of the prelim that they could see Robinson pull the trigger are laughably false. The video quality (wide angle lens, 150 yards away) is so bad that you can't even see a weapon. One former Green Beret says he knows a hundred or more former and current operators and no more than 1% believe the official story. Robert O'Neill, the SEAL widely credited with killing Bin Laden, says he's shot many men at close range, has never seen anything like the movement of Kirk's shirt or his rectangular entry wound, and doesn't believe the official story. A good non-emotional source on the case is the Baron Coleman Podcast. He's a 150-plus episodes in, but just did a 3.5-hour interview with Julian Dorey that might be a good summary of what he's covered (I'll probably watch it this evening). It's at:
George Webb reveals the holes in the narrative, AND the limitted hangout artists. Why do people miss this, and seem like they're participateing in a Jr. high school popularity poll?
John, my mind goes to the explosive pagers, too. Netanyahu gifted Trump with a golden pager to commemorate that attack, but perhaps it was also a subtle threat that any of Trump's family or friends could be next. Trump started playing ball with Netanyahu right after Charlie's death. I don't know what to think; only that the truth is likely not what we're being fed.
Jason Goodman also showed video with two frames showing a bullet approaching Charlie’s neck from behind, while someone else showed video of the back window of the closest vehicle, a van, raising open while the “shot” was heard, while another video shows the silhouette of a man inside holding a rifle with a suppression device. I have seen photos of splinters of black glass and black plastic claimed to be on the carpet of the SUV that transported Charlie to the hospital. If you don’t accept that there were multiple people there involved, you are either ignorant and naive, or involved in the obvious cover-up. I could go on with what John Cullen has presented and Stew Peters, too.
Lee Harvey Oswald did not kill anyone, but at least 3 mafia hitmen did and there were a lot more there ready as well.
You bring up a lot of good points, but do you realize that Jason Goodman is a very disreputable character who most likely steals and recycles his material from original sources? So, referencing him jepardizes the validity of the points unfortunately (or purposefully).
If you know all the facts, it should be obvious to anyone with half a brain that it was an exploding device that killed Charlie, not a bullet. Baron Coleman, Candice Owens, and many others searching for the truth have gathered and shown loads of evidence that proves this. You need to catch up to their uncovered facts. Israel wanted him dead, and his new israeli security team were the ones who placed the exploding device disguised as a microphone on him. I was preparing to go over all lies from the investigation but don't have an hour to give. Just watch shows 32 thru 36 of The Real Matrix Show on Rumble.com. Link provided Rumble.com/c/c-7844818
George Webb is an essential investigator on this and several other major areas of massive import, as well. Despite his recent passion for making AI "music video" to convey his content, of which I'm not a particular fan. (My ears are allergic to AI music, and I like my analyses delivered, i.e., received, in the traditional oral and written format--but that's just me. You can still access George's excellent reporting despite his penchant for the AI music vids) If your missing out on GW, your missing a lot.
Please stop spreading rumors and conspiracy theories. You have no knowledge and these ideas are malicious and incredibly damaging. There is no real or credible evidence of this supposition or any of the ideas you are spreading.
I watched most of the pre trial hearing a few weeks ago. Most of you appearantly did not and persist with delusional and uninformed theories. Or apparently you are getting your information only from people like Candace or influenced by Candace.
Having watched, perhaps you could share the evidence that convinces you of the government case.
One highlight for me was the door cam that caught what was supposedly Robinson's Dodge (no license plate or Flock report) around midnight on 9/10, supposedly as he tried to retrieve the rifle. Under cross, SBI lead investigator Hull was forced to admit that the owner of the door cam reported the Dodge was driven by a bald man and carried three passengers. When the defense attorney asked Hull if he'd mentioned that in his testimony, Hull's said crisply in his English(?) accent, "I did not." In other words, the lead investigator in this huge case admitted lying by omission.
It is IDIOTIC to buy the theory that Grandpa’s 30.06 is the murder weapon.
Actually let me correct that. It is not just idiotic to buy that Tyler’s grandpa’s gun is the murder weapon, anyone who buys that should be relieved of all government licenses ( drivers, hunting, teaching certificates, etc.) On the grounds they are severely mentally impaired. Or perhaps they are paid off, in which case they get to keep their guns and continue to drive…
exactly the point, since there are no answers to these and many other questions you are left to speculate with what makes sense. If our law enforcement agencies were truly transparent you wouldn't have to worry.
The "Jesse on fire" podcast has been asking these questions and many more since right after Charlie Kirk's murder. Like you, he doesn't come to conclusions but he tries to look from every different angle and deeply dissect possibilities. He employs many videos in slow motion or stopped motion and charts and you might want to look at some of his podcasts . The world lost such a great man. One of the few who truly believed in dialogue and love to solve problems.
Warning, Jesse is wild, outrageous, and high intensity. He covers lots and lots of different issues. But for the really important things like Charlie Kirk he looks at every single viewpoint he can think of whether it appears crazy or not. One day he will put forth a disturbing idea but provide evidence for it. The next day he might do a 180 and provide the same amount of evidence on that viewpoint. I think we all need to look at every side of every issue if possible to make an informed decision. That's what took us down the wrong road during covid. No questions were allowed. No one was allowed to disagree. You simply had to swallow what was being fed to you. Ditto for political parties. I have many grandchildren and I constantly encourage them to ask questions. If something is confusing or doesn't seem right to them I want them to learn to ask. I want them to develop a healthy curiosity and critical thinking.
It is Jon Bray’s contention that the neck wound was caused by the accidental incursion and rejection of the microphone battery, and the the form of the corner of the circuit board can be seen in his t shirt. He goes through the medical examiner’s report and explains why 7 of 9 damages to Charlie Kirk’s body fit the explosion directed into his chest cavity and both of his lungs and heart.
Any theory is better than a 30.06 round.
Bulleyes! One bullet hit the jugular right on. That means it was close up and executed well. Only fragments means the bullet was designed to fragment. Nothing was left to chance.
Did CK see his killer the seconds before he was shot? I think so. A glimmer of recognition and he raised the mike in an attempt to protect himself. My reaction. Rifle..no way. Drone or one shot pistol palmed. Expert marksman.
I agree, Thomas.
Lucky shot! No way.
Guess you don't hunt, huh?
So..what does that mean? What is your view? A amateur with a rifle did it?
Lucky shot
agreed
The most technical and extensive analysis of the Rode mic killing Charlie is found here. https://followtheepicenter.com/ Quite convincing.
100% Craig. Great website for detailed truth.
Convinced
very convincing.
Very interesting! Thank you, Craig B., for the link!
The website is super. Jon Bray's newest interview with Stew Peters is a great way to get a detailed but digestible summary of what Jon displays in detail at his website. https://rumble.com/v7doije-destroyed-jon-bray-dismantles-the-official-kirk-autopsy-report.html What John Leake can learn from the interview is: Charlie was dead instantly, so the further questions about treatment etc do not apply. The neck wound is clearly explained by Jon Bray.
Totally brilliant, the truth at last. its like JFK 1963 again, I hope this is not making you a target for the CIA, they usually silence the truth, like they did with JFK witness's, people disappeared and were found in the trunks of cars, buried in the desert.
Unbelievable amount of info in this thread. Thanks for posting
Very convincing. Thank you for sharing that link.
Thanks for showing this video!! It is strange that from the moment Charlie grasps the microphone with both hands and even shortly before that, all the way to the moment of the shot, he CLOSES HIS BOTH EYES..., thus this crazy thought, as if he waited for something... VERY STRANGE!
From the first moment of the guy with dark glasses on the left, jumping on Charlie and the following surrounding other guys doing the same, it appears as if they hide everything what happened afterwards... So similar to Butler's 'incident'...
There were USED gloves in the door pocket in the van Charlie was transported away from scene, which were not there before he was transported to the event. The fact that the entire scenery was REPAVED the following weekend kind of indicates that ALL RESIDUES from the used explosive had to be removed. It was clear to me that the 'SECURITY' TEAM guides this entire murder. That's why Harpole sues Candace right now...
Yes! One of the things I noticed pretty quickly, was that it appeared to me that Charlie was preparing himself by closing his eyes, and making his posture slightly rigid. Some videos show this better than others, especially when enlarged. I didn't know about the used gloves in the door pocket.
I think that it's possible that Charlies audio recording device triggered a squib. Perhaps a hologram was involved, Robinson is a patsy, there was no crime scene, the court case is a sham, and other stuff that I mentioned in another reply. I'm thinking that CHARLIE KIRK isn't dead. I'm very hopeful of that. His positions regarding the Epstein files, and Israel were maybe too hot to handle, so he was put into protection. I do think that Charlie was likely pursued by the CIA when he was in college, and young and very passionate about some of his positions. He may have begun to question some of his initial political, relationship/social, and religious positions.
Right, and he is putting his wife and two children through hell for, what, exactly? The “patsy” was first ID’d by his own parents, confessed to his boyfriend and their friends in their chat room thing, his DNA is on the roof etc etc. Why would he do that? Have any of you seen the actual evidence? Read the autopsy report? All this speculation does nothing but taint the jury pool.
what makes you think he was ID’d by his parents ? Because the media said so ?
This is such nonsense ‼️
Well, I was told that I was a stupid nutcase for believing that the covid shots were dangerous, and that I was to be avoided, because I wasn't "vaccinated". I stuck to my guns, refusing to get genetic material injected, which ends up inserting itself into our DNA. And now Fauchi is appearing before congress, and information is readily available in terms of cardiovascular, miscarriage, and neurological problems related to the shots. My brother died after his second covid shot. I'm a retired RN, and covid was a very uncomfortable wake up call for me.
Since then, I've become aware that wars exist to rich men get richer, and to cause distraction for the the real stuff going on behind the scenes. People disappear (scientists- there's a lot of info on this). Food manufacturers lie and cheat in terms of what is being inserted into our food, farmland is being purchased, seeds are patented, and huge "data" centers are being built all over the world. What happened to climate change? The water and electric use by these behemoth structures will be astronomical. Flock cameras are an additional surveillance tool. So, getting back to Charlie Kirk- I've worked ICU and ER's. The large caliber bullet wounds that I've seen did not respond like Charlie Kirk's did. No medical help was allowed, and he was put in a private car, and the scene was quickly cleaned up. I believe that his life was in danger, and he chose to live. If I thought my life was in danger, I would likely say and do lots of stuff that I normally would not. The world is a psyop, and I'm finally just seeing it for what it really is. I choose to question everything, and to live in reality. I lived in enough unreality white being parented by a covert narcissist mother.
But what would he have been preparing himself for by closing his eyes and posture rigid? It is not like he was suiciding himself or knew what was going to happen unless you are thinking this was a show, he is alive and he knew the time when he put his hands down that it was about to happen???
I think this was a psyop. We live in a world run by psychopaths and I feel that so much history that I learned and thought was truthful, was not. This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong, but I think that Charlie knew that he would be killed if he didn't cooperate. I think he was mentally preparing himself for a squib to be "zapped". He did NOT go rigid enough after the "hit", and his legs should have gone straight .Instead his knees went inward. I've seen decorticate posturing and it does not resemble Charlie's response. I don't think that Charlie evolved into exactly who we think he was/is, but I had the utmost respect for him. I think he realized that he could no longer navigate what our world has become.
I respectfully do not think this was a psyop. Did you see Craig's comment above and the link he provided. Very informative and convincing. You may want to take a look-30 minutes long and takes you step by step. Worth the 30 minutes. I do not believe he would have given up and left his kids not being able to navigate. He had the strength from God in him.
Craigs comment and link below.
The most technical and extensive analysis of the Rode mic killing Charlie is found here. https://followtheepicenter.com/ Quite convincing.
Lori, how is it not a psyop if the 30.06 gun did not kill him? I think it's entirely possible that a cartridge actuated device (or an explosive squib) was used, and this was what could have caused the gas seen under Charlie's shirt. Do you think it's safe if I download the epicenter video?
We will just have to disagree and that is ok. Yes, the video is safe. I downloaded it with no issues.
A 30-06 bullet has a minimum of 2500 ft lbs of energy at that range. A punch from a young Mike Tyson would hit the body with 800-900 ft lbs of energy. The impact of the bullet would have made him wince and close his eyes.
I believe, after following for months the numerous people analyzing and investigating Charlie's assassination, that whatever device exploded under Charlie's shirt, it failed to perform in the way they expected. I think the explosion was intended to pierce directly into the center of Charlie's chest, causing profuse bleeding, which would then make it appear that he'd been shot in the chest by the 30.06 rifle. Instead, the shaped charge (if that's what it was), didn't explode the way they intended, and created a neck wound (which they found difficult to explain afterward).
Charlie, I was told, typically wore black shirts to these campus events. At UVU, he was suddenly wearing a custom white Carhartt one they had made for him; in my thinking, that was to more fully display the expected "massive 30.06 rifle wound" and its profuse resultant bleeding.
The most important aspect of Charlie Kirk’s assassination is that it was Israel.
Every conversation should include this otherwise we are simply distracting people from the most important aspect of the truth.
You state that as fact. What proof do you have?! Or “receipts” as Candace likes to say…🤦🏻♀️
unfortunately this particular thread does not allow us to post photos or I would show you the screenshots from the conversations, but those are all over the Internet so you’ll have to find them yourself, but #Charliekirk said that he thought Israel was going to assassinate him for turning against them, and No Longer taking their bribe money
https://x.com/harrisonhsmith/status/1967389264066564290?s=46&t=zqWNYNLiZiB92R8DfH7aGg
https://x.com/thegrayzonenews/status/1966556093879890052?s=46&t=zqWNYNLiZiB92R8DfH7aGg
https://youtu.be/ZC8RuK4lPBk?si=9R7y5GaJZNCNxqS1
https://x.com/partisangirl/status/1965904134676389970?s=46&t=zqWNYNLiZiB92R8DfH7aGg
https://youtube.com/shorts/HLIwVzzZ3X4?si=D88hK5D3YqCI8aLE
https://x.com/heirofascania/status/1968481877452284152?s=46&t=zqWNYNLiZiB92R8DfH7aGg
For those allergic to the "Israel involvement" narrative, keep in mind it refers to a "rogue element" of said entity, no matter how large, major, and powerful said rogue element may be. Just as in the JFK murder/coup d'etat. In other words, a considerable portion of the population/citizenry at large are innocent and effectively victims or captives when such "rogue" elements take "executive action".
Baron Coleman on the Real Baron Podcast has also been investigating this case. He has similar thoughts as Mr. Leake. It is so informative and entertaining! I highly recommend it!
does Peter McCollough agree with posting this level of conspiracy thinking? Gee, I thought he was more grounded than this.
Do you perceive Dr. McCullough to be a man who blindly accepts the assurances of government agencies?
So, now NO government agencies, including local law enforcement can be trusted? None?
Very appropriate questions raised by an experienced true crime author.
Very appropriate questions raised by an experienced true crime author.
maybe you should ask him yourself since you are on his staff. I think persuing things like this is an exercise in futility and looking for evil in the wrong place when it has clearly presented itself.
Wake up dude
insults? Really bot breath?
Intelligent men and women who understand ballistics find problems with the narrative.
🎯. I love the fact that a 30.06 round stayed in his spindly neck as to not hurt anyone else around!
Did you bother to review the information?
No. I dont think this is good use of time reviewing this kind of speculative. Nothing like this is remotely true.
Incredible that your brain exists
Let it be so stated.
Um, he was one of the few early doctors to question the whole covid narrative. If I want to get to the "truth of the matter", give me a conspiracy theorist any day. I followed Dr. McCullough, Dr. Jessica Rose, Dr. John Campbell (it took John awhile, but he eventually accepted that the covid narrative was false). Also, Dr. Mike Yeadon, and doctors who signed the Great Barrington declaration. As a retired nurse, my world was quite shaken by what I had believed to be true. Now, I no longer believe much of what I see and read.
Nah, he even believes in viruses, but in regsrds to the fake killing, I partixularly like the 1970’s bigfoot photi of the perp, on a modern day college campus with modern day 4k security cams.
The most important thing is to call their current charges around Tyler Robinson what it is.
Absurd.
Evidence at pretrial is overwhelming.....yet those promoting conspiracies STILL ABOUND.
GO spend a semester on a college campus!!!!!!!!!
FULL STOP.
It wasn't overwhelming. It included Lance Twiggs not being 100% sure that was Tyler on video, the bullet fragments not matching the gun, the police body cam "battery dying" just before he found the critical roof screwdriver even though he had just started his shift (and he never mentioned the screwdriver in radio coms), the would-be shooter forgetting which pantsleg was supposed to have the rifle barrel in it and inadvertently bending both legs on video; video having inexplicably missing minutes without explanation; and "Tyler" being seen on video wearing no less than 6 different outfits. If they didn't have Lance claiming he confessed in person to him, I'm not sure this would even go to trial.
The screwdriver that was "found" is not the type required to disassemble the "murder weapon" according to James McNeil of Seal Team 6 who took out Bin Laden.
I can’t understand you. Do you really think that a university education will help a person understand the ballistics of a 30.06??!! It is virtually IMPOSSIBLE for Tyler’s grandad’s antique 30.06 to do damage that we see.
ANYONE with cursory knowledge of firearms knows with certainty that Tyler’s weapon is not the murder weapon.
And anyone with an IQ greater than 80 who doesn’t know the difference between a palm gun and a rifle could be shown in few minutes that Tyler weapon didn’t make the kill shot.
I have a master’s in math from a prestigious university and experience as a teacher.
You don’t need ONE DAY in college, much less a semester to know the purported murder weapon does not match up the accusation.
Nice try on sending an innocent patsy to his death.
PS A person doesn’t need a day of university to know it is indecent to scapegoat an innocent young man.
What is your sorry excuse for being so cruel? Not enough university instruction in human decency?
"Faith, Hope, Life" change your user name to 'full blindness and death' or maybe better 'brainless hope'
The evidence has a HUGE hole in it...no identifiable bullet or bullet fragments.
There are bullet fragments.
You need to work on your reading comprehension, you seem not to understand the word 'identifiable'. Do I need to define that for you?
Exit wound. ???? FULL STOP
I assume you are not an attorney, or you would understand evidence better.
Nobody special - just an typical juror………… who actually listened to the evidence produced in the court room and review by firearms and law enforcement who understood guns and bullets very well. Your worst nightmare I guess. Have a great day!
A nightmare, indeed, but not because you understand, rather because you can be convinced of anything.
based on all the hate my comment has received - I think the opposite is true.
You say you are a juror, which if true is a problem for you and the case.
Apologies.
I should have included the word - HYPOTHETICAL.
The problem is - you can scream at me all you want.
You can live in whatever delusions you want.
You are fueled by utter hatred and that - breaks my heart.
In the court room - all your hate and abuse can't touch the jurors.
How will you silence their voices?
Why have a trial or hear from the defense? The prosecution's narrative settles it.
If you spend a semester listening to college students - you’ll understand a lot more about who they are and what they think.
🤣🤣
That wasn’t meant to be personal.
Sorry.
Wasn't aimed at me, but didn't seem personal. Your belief in the mountain of evidence is shared and promoted largely by people connected to TP/USA, the U.S. government, and/or Israel. But for those without any special interest in the case, the more you look at the evidence, the more holes you see (though not a rifle). Claims by influencers that Erika invited to the last session of the prelim that they could see Robinson pull the trigger are laughably false. The video quality (wide angle lens, 150 yards away) is so bad that you can't even see a weapon. One former Green Beret says he knows a hundred or more former and current operators and no more than 1% believe the official story. Robert O'Neill, the SEAL widely credited with killing Bin Laden, says he's shot many men at close range, has never seen anything like the movement of Kirk's shirt or his rectangular entry wound, and doesn't believe the official story. A good non-emotional source on the case is the Baron Coleman Podcast. He's a 150-plus episodes in, but just did a 3.5-hour interview with Julian Dorey that might be a good summary of what he's covered (I'll probably watch it this evening). It's at:
https://www.youtube.com/@realbaronpodcast
George Webb reveals the holes in the narrative, AND the limitted hangout artists. Why do people miss this, and seem like they're participateing in a Jr. high school popularity poll?
Mine wasn't either.
John, my mind goes to the explosive pagers, too. Netanyahu gifted Trump with a golden pager to commemorate that attack, but perhaps it was also a subtle threat that any of Trump's family or friends could be next. Trump started playing ball with Netanyahu right after Charlie's death. I don't know what to think; only that the truth is likely not what we're being fed.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/06/middleeast/netanyahu-trump-golden-pager-intl
Jason Goodman also showed video with two frames showing a bullet approaching Charlie’s neck from behind, while someone else showed video of the back window of the closest vehicle, a van, raising open while the “shot” was heard, while another video shows the silhouette of a man inside holding a rifle with a suppression device. I have seen photos of splinters of black glass and black plastic claimed to be on the carpet of the SUV that transported Charlie to the hospital. If you don’t accept that there were multiple people there involved, you are either ignorant and naive, or involved in the obvious cover-up. I could go on with what John Cullen has presented and Stew Peters, too.
Lee Harvey Oswald did not kill anyone, but at least 3 mafia hitmen did and there were a lot more there ready as well.
You bring up a lot of good points, but do you realize that Jason Goodman is a very disreputable character who most likely steals and recycles his material from original sources? So, referencing him jepardizes the validity of the points unfortunately (or purposefully).
If you know all the facts, it should be obvious to anyone with half a brain that it was an exploding device that killed Charlie, not a bullet. Baron Coleman, Candice Owens, and many others searching for the truth have gathered and shown loads of evidence that proves this. You need to catch up to their uncovered facts. Israel wanted him dead, and his new israeli security team were the ones who placed the exploding device disguised as a microphone on him. I was preparing to go over all lies from the investigation but don't have an hour to give. Just watch shows 32 thru 36 of The Real Matrix Show on Rumble.com. Link provided Rumble.com/c/c-7844818
George Webb is an essential investigator on this and several other major areas of massive import, as well. Despite his recent passion for making AI "music video" to convey his content, of which I'm not a particular fan. (My ears are allergic to AI music, and I like my analyses delivered, i.e., received, in the traditional oral and written format--but that's just me. You can still access George's excellent reporting despite his penchant for the AI music vids) If your missing out on GW, your missing a lot.
I'm aware of George and seen his stuff.
Not at all surprised. I mention for those readers unaware of George.
Please stop spreading rumors and conspiracy theories. You have no knowledge and these ideas are malicious and incredibly damaging. There is no real or credible evidence of this supposition or any of the ideas you are spreading.
And it’s not malicious to frame an innocent young man who is in danger of being killed?
Now that is pure malice.
And you know this how? Maybe link to a source?
I watched most of the pre trial hearing a few weeks ago. Most of you appearantly did not and persist with delusional and uninformed theories. Or apparently you are getting your information only from people like Candace or influenced by Candace.
Having watched, perhaps you could share the evidence that convinces you of the government case.
One highlight for me was the door cam that caught what was supposedly Robinson's Dodge (no license plate or Flock report) around midnight on 9/10, supposedly as he tried to retrieve the rifle. Under cross, SBI lead investigator Hull was forced to admit that the owner of the door cam reported the Dodge was driven by a bald man and carried three passengers. When the defense attorney asked Hull if he'd mentioned that in his testimony, Hull's said crisply in his English(?) accent, "I did not." In other words, the lead investigator in this huge case admitted lying by omission.
Candace isn’t “influencing”
It is IDIOTIC to buy the theory that Grandpa’s 30.06 is the murder weapon.
Actually let me correct that. It is not just idiotic to buy that Tyler’s grandpa’s gun is the murder weapon, anyone who buys that should be relieved of all government licenses ( drivers, hunting, teaching certificates, etc.) On the grounds they are severely mentally impaired. Or perhaps they are paid off, in which case they get to keep their guns and continue to drive…
Carol, this video is walks through well organized evidence, with video from 4 sources
https://followtheepicenter.com/
Please don't tell me THE OFFICIAL STORY is true!
exactly the point, since there are no answers to these and many other questions you are left to speculate with what makes sense. If our law enforcement agencies were truly transparent you wouldn't have to worry.
There is something wrong with you.
The "Jesse on fire" podcast has been asking these questions and many more since right after Charlie Kirk's murder. Like you, he doesn't come to conclusions but he tries to look from every different angle and deeply dissect possibilities. He employs many videos in slow motion or stopped motion and charts and you might want to look at some of his podcasts . The world lost such a great man. One of the few who truly believed in dialogue and love to solve problems.
Warning, Jesse is wild, outrageous, and high intensity. He covers lots and lots of different issues. But for the really important things like Charlie Kirk he looks at every single viewpoint he can think of whether it appears crazy or not. One day he will put forth a disturbing idea but provide evidence for it. The next day he might do a 180 and provide the same amount of evidence on that viewpoint. I think we all need to look at every side of every issue if possible to make an informed decision. That's what took us down the wrong road during covid. No questions were allowed. No one was allowed to disagree. You simply had to swallow what was being fed to you. Ditto for political parties. I have many grandchildren and I constantly encourage them to ask questions. If something is confusing or doesn't seem right to them I want them to learn to ask. I want them to develop a healthy curiosity and critical thinking.
It is Jon Bray’s contention that the neck wound was caused by the accidental incursion and rejection of the microphone battery, and the the form of the corner of the circuit board can be seen in his t shirt. He goes through the medical examiner’s report and explains why 7 of 9 damages to Charlie Kirk’s body fit the explosion directed into his chest cavity and both of his lungs and heart.
I appreciate your courage and honesty in covering this.