When you encounter someone who still denies that mRNA is a problem ask them these two questions: How do you shut off the production of mRNA once the body starts making it? The answer you get will be either "it shuts itself off", "you don't need to" or "I don't know".
Regardless of the answer you then ask the follow-up, "What happens if it doesn't shut off and the body keeps making spike protein for a very long time?"
The answers aren't important. You aren't looking for a debate. You simply need to place the idea into skeptics' heads that the possibility of a problem is real. They should ask questions.
Now, from what I've seen the hard-core, cognitively dissonanced (hey, if "dissed" can make it into the dictionary...) will invent any number of ways to cope ("the body just destroys it, no problem" or "the cells that make it die off very quickly" or whatever pharma talking point they've scooped up this week). In many ways, society was already in a lot of trouble far before America unleashed the lab-grown covid and its population-reducing cancer reagent clot shot onto the general public.
The RNA sequence of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 does not contain a stopper codon, meaning that once it enters a cell, it will continue to be produced until the cell runs out of resources and dies.
It was just this sort of issue that put me off mRNA in the first place, along with reading about "off target" effects and auto immune. To put it another way, if you throw a wrench in a complex clockwork, to knock a fly off one of the gears, what are the chances that the wrench, falling into the clockwork, will produce a greater unintended harm than the intended benefit? And our genetics, immune system and physiology are magnitudes more complex than any clockwork.
It's the basic precautionary principle writ large whenever messing with our basic genetic code, for any perceived benefit but the most dire, critical condition.
So unless Covid was plague with a 90% death rate, which it manifestly wasn't, the potential for unintended, severe and long term harm from novel, genome altering therapy could never have been justified.
Exactly. They can't shut it off and every single person makes a different amount for a different length of time from different types of cells all over the body. The entire thing is, as Mr. Leake correctly compares, a Frankenstein experiment.
I'm glad most of the jabbees at least quit shedding much of it after 2 weeks or so. Why did they even go out in public, esp. to social get-togethers, while still actively shedding? This was a nightmare in December 2022 and January 2023. (I don't recall which shot or booster was then prevalent.) Irresponsible, and most of them claim no awareness they were shedding. RIP! to the dearly departed who did their "civic duty".
I'm not sure at that point in time most people were even aware of such a thing as shedding. In fact, I highly doubt they are aware even now. Who would have told them about it? Certainly not the "news." Not their doctor. Most took the shot out of fear (and for good reason considering the all-out psyop) and are now probably too scared to even look at anything that isn't reassuring them "Don't worry, it's fiiiiiiine."
It's one thing to tell them and another for them to believe it. One thing's for sure, though: Vaccine sales are way, way down. People just don't trust big pharma anymore. I hope a new craze of getting in shape and eating healthy will sweep the world. That's the best way to fight back against the physical and mental abuse that government and pharma have inflicted upon everyone.
Just my opinion only but...I recently had a dental appointment--cleaning only. Both the dentist and technician were new to me because my old dentist office--owned by the same conglomerate--closed. I was sent to this "sister office" who now has my records. The day after I felt horrible. My nose ran. I felt achey. I felt blasted like almost numb. It took 2-3 days to return my body to normal. I did not in any way feel ill before the appointment. I think people continue to shed...perhaps not as much as immediately after injection, but I'm now extremely wary of close interaction as I was with teeth being cleaned. I continue to remain almost 100% isolated with the exception of talking to a neighbor now and then...so it's easy for me to pinpoint causes.
Aside from knowledge of turbo-cancer, all doctors know how fast some cancers can metasticize. They know how important it is to have a fast biopsy and fast removal of the mass. I've found that even doctors in the US have little to no say in operating room availability. I'm in Washington State. Both times that I had cancer (kidney and breast) that needed excision, I contacted cancer departments in medical centers in Oregon, Colorado, Minnesota, Ohio, Louisiana, and Texas for quick surgery availability. Ultimately, I chose The Cleveland Clinic, Ohio and MD Anderson, Texas, paying only the price of an airline ticket out of pocket. As John Leake said, sometimes you need to take matters into your own hands and call around. None of the cancer departments I phoned had any reluctance telling me how far out their operating room availability was.
Dr. William Makis md. reports daily on ivermectin and/or fenbendazole treatments.
He claims these drugs are effective in approximately 70% of cancer patients within four to five months. He also claims they can be used in combination with conventional cancer treatments.
Many believe Dr Patrick Soon-Shiong to be "controlled opposition," a belief confirmed by his recent push of the paper that implicated Covid-19 infection (not the mRNA vaccine) in the rise of breast cancers, which to anyone who understands the difference between uridine (in C-19 spike) versus much longer lasting N1 Methyl pseudo uridine, in the mRNA vaccines, is at best highly questionable.
But his statement that toxic chemotherapy treatments are a flawed approach to combating cancer is closer to the target.
The uridine is in the viral mRNA, but not in the spike proteins, which the viral mRNA codes for. The pseudo uridine is the the Modified messenger RNA, mmRNA which comes from the so called "vaccine" and for which someone got a nobel prize since it made the modified mRNA last a lot longer.
It's Karikó Katalin.Someone commented that she was knowledgeable about RNA experiments but had little medical knowledge.
◎The Karolinska Institutet in Sweden, which selects the Nobel Prize, receives research funding from the Bill Gates Foundation, Fauci's NIH, and the Department of Defense.
Here too, Bill Gates was lurking behind the scenes.
That Tucker interview was some time back and I watched it then, for a while until I couldn't. I don't remember the particulars, but I was not at all impressed by Soon-Shiong. He did not strike me as a useful advocate for the truth about what's going on at all. The opposite actually.
I watched this interview with Tucker a couple of weeks ago and highly recommend. How outrageous and disgusting that so many doctors these days are willing to completely abandon their hippocratic oath to make a few dollars. I haven’t seen a doctor in several years and I don’t intend to unless it’s some sort of emergency.
Exactly my thoght nat homicide service thry just tried to kill my 90yr old husband in the interests of Pain management with daily oxycodone, and more Prn before physio plus 8 paracetamol a day after a fall wrenched his Leg muscle. He was only in pain when they picked up his leg to move it off the bed prior to walking. NO PAIN WALKING. STaNDING Or SITTinG i said to the 5 brick wall consultants over his 10 day stay in hospital. Not sure why they couldnt have consulted their computers. Home on Monday and no longer a Zombie by Thursday on only 2 paracetamol a day to help him sleep through.
A disgrace he was headed for lack of capacity. I had to prove i was his attorney in LP A , had i not he would have been kept in, lost capacity to make clear decisions and ebbed away. The carer i got to help at home said she agreed, left there he would have died. Homicide absolutely.
I heard the same thing. I have no idea if it is true. Back in the day I would dismiss it right away, now after what we have been through I am not so sure.
Dr. Nixon from Australia first confirmed nanotech in dental anesthetics. A simple search (not Google) will provide details. He also has a substack. Others confirmed his findings.
It's true.All of it.All anesthetics, not just dental.Dr Ana Maria Mihalcea used to analyze all that on dark microscopy and proved it.She's no longer active on here but her work is still on substack.
As children and teens of the late 20th Century, we were taught to fear "Nazis" and "1984."
Based on experience of the 21st Century, I would (along with Frankenstein) point to The Island of Dr. Moreau and Brave New World as central, cautionary tales for our time.
Hubris (married to technology) may be more dangerous now than intentional tyranny.
John, naturalnews.com and related brighteon.com by Mike Adams have an extensive body of work about natural treatments and cures for different types of cancers. Also, your friend might want to look into some of the extensive writings by retired British doctor and prolific author Vernon Coleman at vernoncoleman.com.
Your suggestion to not wait to do required surgery is correct. I have a Canadian ladyfriend customer who was diagnosed with cancer and I suggested she go wherever in the world had the best treatment. She could afford it and went to Germany and they cured her quickly.
An athletic nephew developed testicular cancer and the doctors here told him to get his affairs in order. He said phooey on that and scoured the internet to find the best treatment centre and ended up going to the US for treatment. Cost $300K at the time plus a 40K tuneup a couple of years later but he is still with us.
We've seen it before. Over. And over. And over. Remember, Communist China's "expert" arrogance led to massive famine, people killing people, being killed just trying to eat after the "expert's" solution to low crop yields made entire crops disappear. Totalitarianism kills like no other form of government.
Paved With Good Intentions: Mao Tse-Tung’s “Four Pests” Disaster
Government interventions to control the natural microbial world can only end in disaster. Man is not God. Men who think themselves gods lack humility and lack respect for the natural world. And those type of men who populate the political class and academia will arrogantly believe their mass murders are "for the greater good" in their social engineering breaking of eggs to make omelets.
New York Times Statement About 1932 Pulitzer Prize Awarded to Walter Duranty
Yes, turbo cancer is one thing…..but socialized medicine is also another issue. You will normally wait much longer on the NHS for any surgery. And you will also normally not be able to get a second opinion. All ‘consultants (specialists) can only be seen through a referral from your GP. While it is all well and good to have ‘free’ medical care, I remember learning that medical care has 3 options: quality, availability and cost. But you can only have 2 of them. If you want immediate availability and good quality, it will have a high cost. If you want low/no cost and quick availability you sacrifice the medical quality you receive.
The National Homicide Service is designed exactly as intended.
When you encounter someone who still denies that mRNA is a problem ask them these two questions: How do you shut off the production of mRNA once the body starts making it? The answer you get will be either "it shuts itself off", "you don't need to" or "I don't know".
Regardless of the answer you then ask the follow-up, "What happens if it doesn't shut off and the body keeps making spike protein for a very long time?"
The answers aren't important. You aren't looking for a debate. You simply need to place the idea into skeptics' heads that the possibility of a problem is real. They should ask questions.
Now, from what I've seen the hard-core, cognitively dissonanced (hey, if "dissed" can make it into the dictionary...) will invent any number of ways to cope ("the body just destroys it, no problem" or "the cells that make it die off very quickly" or whatever pharma talking point they've scooped up this week). In many ways, society was already in a lot of trouble far before America unleashed the lab-grown covid and its population-reducing cancer reagent clot shot onto the general public.
The RNA sequence of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 does not contain a stopper codon, meaning that once it enters a cell, it will continue to be produced until the cell runs out of resources and dies.
It was just this sort of issue that put me off mRNA in the first place, along with reading about "off target" effects and auto immune. To put it another way, if you throw a wrench in a complex clockwork, to knock a fly off one of the gears, what are the chances that the wrench, falling into the clockwork, will produce a greater unintended harm than the intended benefit? And our genetics, immune system and physiology are magnitudes more complex than any clockwork.
It's the basic precautionary principle writ large whenever messing with our basic genetic code, for any perceived benefit but the most dire, critical condition.
So unless Covid was plague with a 90% death rate, which it manifestly wasn't, the potential for unintended, severe and long term harm from novel, genome altering therapy could never have been justified.
If it not shut off, and the body keep making spike protein for a very long time, you'll need to eat pineapple or other proteases for a very long time.
Exactly. They can't shut it off and every single person makes a different amount for a different length of time from different types of cells all over the body. The entire thing is, as Mr. Leake correctly compares, a Frankenstein experiment.
I'm glad most of the jabbees at least quit shedding much of it after 2 weeks or so. Why did they even go out in public, esp. to social get-togethers, while still actively shedding? This was a nightmare in December 2022 and January 2023. (I don't recall which shot or booster was then prevalent.) Irresponsible, and most of them claim no awareness they were shedding. RIP! to the dearly departed who did their "civic duty".
I'm not sure at that point in time most people were even aware of such a thing as shedding. In fact, I highly doubt they are aware even now. Who would have told them about it? Certainly not the "news." Not their doctor. Most took the shot out of fear (and for good reason considering the all-out psyop) and are now probably too scared to even look at anything that isn't reassuring them "Don't worry, it's fiiiiiiine."
I told them; after many Substack writers informed me about it. I experienced it quite personally. Yeah, some "civic duty"!
It's one thing to tell them and another for them to believe it. One thing's for sure, though: Vaccine sales are way, way down. People just don't trust big pharma anymore. I hope a new craze of getting in shape and eating healthy will sweep the world. That's the best way to fight back against the physical and mental abuse that government and pharma have inflicted upon everyone.
Just my opinion only but...I recently had a dental appointment--cleaning only. Both the dentist and technician were new to me because my old dentist office--owned by the same conglomerate--closed. I was sent to this "sister office" who now has my records. The day after I felt horrible. My nose ran. I felt achey. I felt blasted like almost numb. It took 2-3 days to return my body to normal. I did not in any way feel ill before the appointment. I think people continue to shed...perhaps not as much as immediately after injection, but I'm now extremely wary of close interaction as I was with teeth being cleaned. I continue to remain almost 100% isolated with the exception of talking to a neighbor now and then...so it's easy for me to pinpoint causes.
Aside from knowledge of turbo-cancer, all doctors know how fast some cancers can metasticize. They know how important it is to have a fast biopsy and fast removal of the mass. I've found that even doctors in the US have little to no say in operating room availability. I'm in Washington State. Both times that I had cancer (kidney and breast) that needed excision, I contacted cancer departments in medical centers in Oregon, Colorado, Minnesota, Ohio, Louisiana, and Texas for quick surgery availability. Ultimately, I chose The Cleveland Clinic, Ohio and MD Anderson, Texas, paying only the price of an airline ticket out of pocket. As John Leake said, sometimes you need to take matters into your own hands and call around. None of the cancer departments I phoned had any reluctance telling me how far out their operating room availability was.
Dr. William Makis md. reports daily on ivermectin and/or fenbendazole treatments.
He claims these drugs are effective in approximately 70% of cancer patients within four to five months. He also claims they can be used in combination with conventional cancer treatments.
https://makismd.substack.com/p/fenbendazole-and-cancer-part-2-treating
https://makismd.substack.com/p/ivermectin-articles-and-protocols?publication_id=1385328
https://justusrhope.substack.com/archive?sort=new
https://robertyoho.substack.com/p/274-repost-fenbendazole-cures-many
https://search.brave.com/search?q=ivermectin+kills+10+different+cancer+cells+nih+pub&source=web
Spare a thought for UK freedom of expression
A thought isn’t going to help.
Many believe Dr Patrick Soon-Shiong to be "controlled opposition," a belief confirmed by his recent push of the paper that implicated Covid-19 infection (not the mRNA vaccine) in the rise of breast cancers, which to anyone who understands the difference between uridine (in C-19 spike) versus much longer lasting N1 Methyl pseudo uridine, in the mRNA vaccines, is at best highly questionable.
But his statement that toxic chemotherapy treatments are a flawed approach to combating cancer is closer to the target.
The uridine is in the viral mRNA, but not in the spike proteins, which the viral mRNA codes for. The pseudo uridine is the the Modified messenger RNA, mmRNA which comes from the so called "vaccine" and for which someone got a nobel prize since it made the modified mRNA last a lot longer.
It's Karikó Katalin.Someone commented that she was knowledgeable about RNA experiments but had little medical knowledge.
◎The Karolinska Institutet in Sweden, which selects the Nobel Prize, receives research funding from the Bill Gates Foundation, Fauci's NIH, and the Department of Defense.
Here too, Bill Gates was lurking behind the scenes.
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants/2020/09/inv019352
https://ki.se/en
That Tucker interview was some time back and I watched it then, for a while until I couldn't. I don't remember the particulars, but I was not at all impressed by Soon-Shiong. He did not strike me as a useful advocate for the truth about what's going on at all. The opposite actually.
I watched this interview with Tucker a couple of weeks ago and highly recommend. How outrageous and disgusting that so many doctors these days are willing to completely abandon their hippocratic oath to make a few dollars. I haven’t seen a doctor in several years and I don’t intend to unless it’s some sort of emergency.
Exactly my thoght nat homicide service thry just tried to kill my 90yr old husband in the interests of Pain management with daily oxycodone, and more Prn before physio plus 8 paracetamol a day after a fall wrenched his Leg muscle. He was only in pain when they picked up his leg to move it off the bed prior to walking. NO PAIN WALKING. STaNDING Or SITTinG i said to the 5 brick wall consultants over his 10 day stay in hospital. Not sure why they couldnt have consulted their computers. Home on Monday and no longer a Zombie by Thursday on only 2 paracetamol a day to help him sleep through.
A disgrace he was headed for lack of capacity. I had to prove i was his attorney in LP A , had i not he would have been kept in, lost capacity to make clear decisions and ebbed away. The carer i got to help at home said she agreed, left there he would have died. Homicide absolutely.
Paracetamol is hepatotoxic. Ibuprofen is safer.
the toxic effects are dose related. Ibuprofen is safer for the liver but hard on the kidneys. Again, effects are dose related.
This is the type of anecdote that John Campbell might be interested in relaying
As I recall from a previous interview with that doctor, he also believes that Covid-19, even a "mild case" causes cancer. I don't trust him.
It is said that a single injection (0.5 times) produces 500 to 10,000 times more spike protein antigen than a natural infection.
What's more, because it is produced by culturing E. coli, it contains the highly toxic endotoxin.
Both are believed to be carcinogenic.
Anyone can see that even natural infection can be slightly carcinogenic, but it is not as carcinogenic as vaccination.
And the injections have additional harmful ingredients like cancer promoter SV40 and aluminum.
When you look at existing vaccines for children and adults, even though they are clear, it seems like sewage would be more beneficial.
I recently have heard and I don’t if there is any truth to it, anesthesia may also be contaminated with mRNA in dentistry and also insulin, lamasil?
I heard the same thing. I have no idea if it is true. Back in the day I would dismiss it right away, now after what we have been through I am not so sure.
Dr. Nixon from Australia first confirmed nanotech in dental anesthetics. A simple search (not Google) will provide details. He also has a substack. Others confirmed his findings.
It's true.All of it.All anesthetics, not just dental.Dr Ana Maria Mihalcea used to analyze all that on dark microscopy and proved it.She's no longer active on here but her work is still on substack.
Thanks for the 'info'. It's always good to be on the alert. So, if I ever any type of anesthesia, I know the questions to ask!
... if I ever "need" any type of anesthesia ...
As children and teens of the late 20th Century, we were taught to fear "Nazis" and "1984."
Based on experience of the 21st Century, I would (along with Frankenstein) point to The Island of Dr. Moreau and Brave New World as central, cautionary tales for our time.
Hubris (married to technology) may be more dangerous now than intentional tyranny.
John, naturalnews.com and related brighteon.com by Mike Adams have an extensive body of work about natural treatments and cures for different types of cancers. Also, your friend might want to look into some of the extensive writings by retired British doctor and prolific author Vernon Coleman at vernoncoleman.com.
The website Chrisbeatcancer.com is very good.
The only Godsend is 30% of the vials were Saline 🥲
Your suggestion to not wait to do required surgery is correct. I have a Canadian ladyfriend customer who was diagnosed with cancer and I suggested she go wherever in the world had the best treatment. She could afford it and went to Germany and they cured her quickly.
An athletic nephew developed testicular cancer and the doctors here told him to get his affairs in order. He said phooey on that and scoured the internet to find the best treatment centre and ended up going to the US for treatment. Cost $300K at the time plus a 40K tuneup a couple of years later but he is still with us.
We've seen it before. Over. And over. And over. Remember, Communist China's "expert" arrogance led to massive famine, people killing people, being killed just trying to eat after the "expert's" solution to low crop yields made entire crops disappear. Totalitarianism kills like no other form of government.
Paved With Good Intentions: Mao Tse-Tung’s “Four Pests” Disaster
Discover Magazine, February 26, 2014
https://www.discovermagazine.com/health/paved-with-good-intentions-mao-tse-tungs-four-pests-disaster
China’s deadly science lesson: How an ill-conceived campaign against sparrows contributed to one of the worst famines in history
SAGE Journals, September 10, 2018
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0306422018800259
The Four Pests Campaign: How Killing Sparrows Led to Famine in China
A-Z Animals, March 14, 2024
https://a-z-animals.com/articles/the-four-pests-campaign-how-killing-sparrows-led-to-famine-in-china/
China’s Worst Self-Inflicted Environmental Disaster: The Campaign to Wipe Out the Common Sparrow
Gizmodo, July 18, 2012
https://gizmodo.com/china-s-worst-self-inflicted-environmental-disaster-th-5927112
It's not a coincidence that Totalitarian forms of government have the highest Democide (Death by Government) body counts of all. It's not even close:
Chart:
https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/DBG.TAB1.6.GIF
Death by Government RJ Rummel, 1994
https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NOTE1.HTM
Government interventions to control the natural microbial world can only end in disaster. Man is not God. Men who think themselves gods lack humility and lack respect for the natural world. And those type of men who populate the political class and academia will arrogantly believe their mass murders are "for the greater good" in their social engineering breaking of eggs to make omelets.
New York Times Statement About 1932 Pulitzer Prize Awarded to Walter Duranty
https://archive.ph/gzlZs
Yes, turbo cancer is one thing…..but socialized medicine is also another issue. You will normally wait much longer on the NHS for any surgery. And you will also normally not be able to get a second opinion. All ‘consultants (specialists) can only be seen through a referral from your GP. While it is all well and good to have ‘free’ medical care, I remember learning that medical care has 3 options: quality, availability and cost. But you can only have 2 of them. If you want immediate availability and good quality, it will have a high cost. If you want low/no cost and quick availability you sacrifice the medical quality you receive.